1 img
This file contains:
From Price to Haldeman RE: his gratitude for sending along the Connally speech for Mutual radio, with the request that he read it carefully. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 9/21/1972
From Price Jr. RE: an attached sample speech written so superbly that the President requests that the writing staff read it as a good example of a well done political speech. 1 pg. [Subject: White House Staff] [Memo], 9/21/1972
From Connally to Mutual Broadcasting System RE:the cause of being a Democrat for Nixon. 8 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Other Document], no date
From Haldeman to Price RE: John Connally's hard-hitting speech to be given on Mutual Radio. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 9/16/1972
RE: A speech by Bakshian for Connally to give to Mutual Broadcasting radio. 7 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Other Document], 8/30/1972
RE: inaccurate nationwide and New York ratings for both Connally and McGovern. Author unknown. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Report], no date
From Higby to Strachan RE: the possibility of getting Teeter to do an updated election analysis. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/26/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the effectiveness of Tom Kuchel in doing some radio and television spots for Nixon in California. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/19/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the need to mention in the attack meeting not to have anybody speak of trying to run up a record vote or a landslide or a record mandate. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/19/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: a plan to send a Presidential wire to all chairman and state/local reelect committees to increase their efforts. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/17/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the need to find out whether or not they have a candidate in Boggs' district. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/17/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the status on the New York Overnights for the half-hour documentary on McGovern, the situation on the poll plan, and the status of the poll. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/16/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: a copy of the last results of the national poll concerning issues. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/13/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the need for a revised list of the states they worry about being too close. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/13/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the need for a revised list of states in terms of concentrating surrogates, etc. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/13/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the need for another Blunt Poll and Rhode Island poll. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/13/1927
From Higby to Strachan RE: the need to prepare an advertisement pointing out that McGovern would like the United States to sell out on Vietnam. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/13/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the supposed confusion of the Chotiner/Ehrlichman/McGovern contributor situation. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/12/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the status of the endorsement letters to candidates needed by Monday. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/12/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: Ehrlichman's memorandum entitled "The South: Politics and Issues" concerning poll data of all of the southern states. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/12/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the confusion over Haldeman's input on the advertising decision before going to MacGregor. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/12/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: whether or not Teeter fouled up the miscellaneous state polls. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/9/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the locations of where the "Welcome McGovern" advertisements will run over the weekend. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/9/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the "Get Out the Vote Telegrams" and the Congressional endorsement letters not being sent out until they undergo some sort of approval. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/6/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: a close race in Massachusetts and the proposition for a "Welcoming George" credibility advertisement in every major city that McGovern appears in. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: their need to be ready to attack once McGovern's Vietnam address is given. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: a complete schedule of future fieldwork between this date and the election. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the plan to drop several questions from the weekend poll and replace them with a whole Teeter series on corruption. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the question as to where the updated Senate Race sheet is. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: Teeter's bad decision to poll California right away. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: unacceptable advertising that is to be pulled out of the attack group in that it has nothing to do with composition. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: their updated list of outstanding projects to be completed. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the need to obtain a copy of McGovern's Vietnam policy speech. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: thoughts on how the White House is to be set up on election night. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the Senatorial and Gubernatorial information receive from the rolling wave polls of Teeter. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: his alterations in regards to the polls during Strachan's absence. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/3/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: decent attached documents that should be sent to the November Group for evaluation. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/3/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the need to selfevaluate their commercials, Five-minute spots, documentaries, etc. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/3/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the useless lackluster quality of their recent poll data. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/3/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the possibility showing some originality and think of ideas for bettering their advertisements. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/3/1972
From Higby to Snyder RE: the urgent need to see the New York Overnight ratings between this date and the election. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/2/1972
From Higby to Strachan RE: the need to send certificates to all the dinner chairmen that the President has not yet called. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/2/1972
From Higby to Teeter RE: the question as to why they seem to be going up in their key states but down in the nation based on recent Gallup and Harris data. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/5/1972
From Higby to Ziegler RE: the need to arrange the production of some columns to analyze what the election means. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/9/1972
#26145409