Statement by President Eisenhower at Paris Summit
This press release contains the transcript of President Eisenhower's statement at the Paris Summit in which he addressed Soviet Premier Krushchev's demands pertaining to the recently downed American U-2 spy plane.
Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
72736300
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 16, 1960
James C. Hagerty, Press Secretary to President Eisenhower
THE WHITE HOUSE
(Paris, France)
STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT EISENHOWER
Having been informed yesterday by General de Gaulle and Prime
Minister Macmillan of the position which Mr. Khrushchav has taken
in regard to this conference during his calle yesterday morning on
theme I gave most careful thought as to how this matter should best
be handled, Having in mind the grea$ importance of this conference
and the hopes that thepeoples of all the world have reposed in this
meeting, I concluded that in the circumstances it was best to see if at
todays private meeting any possibility existed through the exercise of
reason and restraint to dispose of this matter of the overflights,
which would have permitted the conference to go forward.
I was under no illusion as to the probability of success of any such
approach but I felt that in view of the great responsibility resting on me
as President of the United States this effort should be made.
In this I received the strongest support of my colleagues President
de Gaulle and Prime Minister Macmillan. Accordingly, at this morning's
private session, despite the violence and inaccuracy of Mr. Khrushchev's
statements, I replied to him on the following terms:
I had previously been informed of the sense of the statement just
read by Premier Khrushchev.
In my statement of May 11th and in the statement of Secretary Herter
of May 9th, the position of the United States was made clear with respect
to the distasteful necessity of espionage activities in a world where nations
distrust each other's intentions. We pointed out that these activities had
no aggressive intent but rather were to assure the safety of the United
States and the free world against surprise attack by a power which boasts
of its ability to devastate the United States and other countries by
missiles armed with atomic warheads. As is well known, not only the
United States but most other countries are constantly the targets of
elaborate and/persistent espionage of the Soviet Union.
There is in the Soviet statement an evident misapprehension on one
key point. It alleges that the United States has, through official statements,
threatened continued overflights. The importance of this alleged threat
was emphasized and repeated by Mr. Khrushchev. The United States has
made no such threat. Neither I nor my government has intended any.
The actual statements go no further than to say that the United States
will not shirk its responsibility to safeguard against surprise attack.
more
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to