Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
16618472
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2PSF! Germany: Dodd 1933-35
THE PROBLEM OF REVISION
The position of authority and detachment
which LORD GREY of FALLODON holds in British
public life gives peculiar importance to his rare
political ulterances, especially when they cover
the field of foreign affairs, in which his own
great reputation was made. It may be hoped
therefore that the words which he used "about
Germany in his speech to the Liberal Council
yesterday will be understood in that country to
be representative of the greater part of public
opinion in Great Britain, and will be studied
and pondered not only by the German Govern-
ment but also by the German public, from whom
so much salutary truth is nowadays carefully
concealed. He spoke of the considerable good
will for the German Republic which had been
built up gradually in this country during the last
decade, how violently that feeling had been
shocked during the last few weeks, and
how rapidly sympathy had been trans-
formed into mistrust. He summed up the
cause of that mistrust in a single phrase. The
feeling has grown, apparently throughout
Germany," he said, that might is right and
that all means are legitimate." He was re-
ferring to the measures which the Nazi Govern-
ment has taken for the nationalization" of
Germany internally. But clearly he felt, as so
many others have regretfully come to believe
during these weeks of Counter-Revolution,"
that there has been no real change of heart in
Germany since 1914; and that the same abomin-
able philosophy of force, now being exultantly
applied at home, would once more be intro-
duced into the conduct of foreign polic
Germany
in
do
so.
Fortunal
ine or the world she is not. he
great security for peace at the resent
moment, LOKO GREY said munuy) den
Germany is not armed and not in a position to
go to war."
It is a terrible indictment: and, if it were the
whole truth, it would imply that no other chance
of peace lay before Europe than that Germany
should be indefinitely intimidated by the
possession of superior force by other countries,
and particularly by her neighbours. After the
experience of the last ten years it would not be
sufficient to wait for the restoration of a
moderate Government in Berlin. For what
guarantee could there be that another Counter-
Revolution" might not make an end of it,
and once more drill the country into armed
nationalism ? Germany is what her racial
characteristics and her geographical position
make her. There is no present prospect of a
return of the liberalism which LORD GREY says
the world needs and in any case other countries
have to deal with the German Government of
the day. There might conceivably be cases of
a Government which palpably did not repre-
sent the country. But that is not true of the
Hitler Government. Whatever its methods and
however bitterly its opponents may resent its
triumph, it has assuredly a far more enthusiastic
and far wider support among the German people
than any of its predecessors of recent years.
That nothing succeeds like success is parti-
cularly true among a people so strongly imbued
with the herd instinct as the Germans ; and
hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, have
been converted to the Nazi leader since his
advent to power. Germany at the moment is
HERR HITLER.
BEST AVAILABLE COPY.
It cannot be said that in regard to foreign
affairs the present CHANCELLOR has made
speeches or committed acts which can properly
cause umbrage abroad. Some of his lieutenants
have indeed made foolish threats and used
obnoxious phrases. The Vice-Chancellor,
HERR VON PAPEN, for instance, in his statement
to LORD NEWTON two days ago, coolly remarked
that the prevailing economic chaos was due to
the political and economic insanity of the
peace settlements." He believed that to be the
*conclusion to which the world had come." The
world has come to no such conclusion; and the
longer he and his colleagues encourage their
countrymen to imagine that the world outside
is longing to reverse the decisions of a politi-
"cally and economically insane" treaty the
more difficult they will render the prospect of
its reconsideration and possible modification. In
point of fact the view that the Treaty of
Versailles was an unjust and vindictive instru-
ment was held, outside Germany, only by com-
paratively small groups of intellectuals and
pacificists of precisely that mentality which,
inside Germany, the Nazi movement has
violently suppressed. Moderate opinion in this
country, at any rate, considers that the Peace
Treaties were on the whole justly and con-
siderately framed, and that their territorial
provisions correspond closely to racial dis-
tribution in Europe. It is, however, realized
that certain clauses, and in a minor degree, some
of the territorial arrangements, have pressed
hardly upon the vanquished countries; and it
is known that in particular the German people
have never really accepted at heart a peace
which their representatives were not allowed to
negotiate. Some modifications have already
been made. It may be judged wise and equitable
to make others. The question of Treaty revision
has been brought into the forefront of European
affairs. It can never now be got rid of merely
by a policy of repression. The issue must be
Lindon
THE TIMES SATURDAY APRIL 29
fairly faced. Are any of the present grievances
of Germany legitimate ? Is there any reason
why Germany should not be asked to state her
claims ? It is just as important to decide which
are impossible as to decide which may be
justified. And it would do much to clear the
atmosphere if the Governments which have
taken the lead in this matter could issue an
unambiguous statement that no drastic re-
fashioning of the map of Europe is even
remotely intended.
The problem of revision was dealt with at
great length a few days ago by the Foreign
Minister of Czechoslovakia, DR. BENESH, whose
long occupation of one of the key positions in
Central Europe gives him a special claim to be
heard. He said that those who had raised the
question of revision deserved gratitude, Nobody
imagined that for an indefinite period the van-
quished countries ought to be left in the position
of chastened and inferior adversaries." The
object of the Peace Treaties, he said, was to
establish a new order in Europe, in which there
was DO temptation to a war of revenge. He
insisted that the real problem before Europe
was to decide where the process of
evolution, already begun, should stop-
which was the point where we will con-
" sider the equilibrium between the two camps
" to be definitely established." Small adjust-
ments of frontier might be possible, he declared,
only if no outside pressure were brought to bear
upon those who were called upon to make sacri-
fices, if the changes were made in an atmosphere
of tranquillity and after several years of calm
collaboration between the nations affected; and
if the sacrifices were accompanied by equitable
compensations. This is the language of states-
manship; and it was appreciated as such in
Hungary. But the reception of DR. BENESH'S
speech in Germany only showed how extrava-
gant are the hopes entertained there and how
wild are the ideas of how they can best be
realized. An authoritative statement from those
who raised the issue of revision is desirable to
lispel needless alarm on the one side and false
opes on the other.
PSF i Ilodd
cort
October 13.1933
Wordd
Dear Mr. Persident:
Cefter the long delay in
my official recognition here, The engage
m lests for public a ppearances fried mh
& title. Bct. 5, I spoke before Currican
Society here on the Dilemma in the nited
states and October 12, Columbus
day, I used the oceasion to point ont
the huzzards of arbitrary and nimority
government under the subject of
Economic Nationalism Since same
criticism has been cabled back by
same of The Hearst press people
and Thinking, therefore, that same
unbarrassing interpret at in.
may have been put out at home I
taxing The liberty of enclosing verbation
copies. In case you do wer set time to
rest yourself by reading cas s have the
habit of doing), I hope you will look over
these pages.
I was informed beforehand that
members of the F oreign and Economic
ministries would be presentioned an
sequently, & granped subjects of my
discussion so that all industrial countries
might have clue attention. I also endersored
to be absolutely non-partison as between
countring, fiving Jormany a little less
implied criticisms than any ocher. the
result was in both cases extraortinary
approval of Germans present, as also of
am own business people. Co fies of
nes were supplied to German as well as
our own press. Gs the seand address
has to be attended by Dr von Schacht and others of The
Reichabanx and 7 oreign office, I subsidied mes,
to comusellor here (very strongly (motokol) and he
agreed that no me my where could reasonably
take offerse. and would add that im Schacht publicly
agreed and applanded extravagantly and are other
present. I have never noted more manimous
approval. nearly all the press here Cexcept extrame nazi
organ which ignored ocasion) gave fair and favorable
winnent next day. my interpretation of this s that
are liberal Gormany is with us- and more than half
of Germany in a heart liberal.
Paron so long a story. In ease state Department
protokol people make complaint, I wish you to know
that it was my purpose to put forward in best
way possible American ideals as you, Wieson, Lim.
caler and Jefferson interpreted Them. It is ruy
view that Europe, especially eastern Surope, needs to
have lumarican primciples put before their peoples as
eated fees file are in the main with res, only chey
clearly as possible - the educated and even anadm-
are for bidd in to say anything
This has been the handest day , have yet had
here. The Kanzler and The cabruat have been in
out come. I hope Gerruary in entering Imera fract.
session mearly are say. you probably K now the
Junns Sincerely Reciam E. Dodd
PSF; Bodd
Address delivered by Ambassador William E.
Dodd at American Club Dinner, Hotel Espla-
ande, Berlin, October 5,1933.
THE DILEMMA IN THE UNITED STATES
There has hardly been a parallel in modern
history to the dileman which all industrial
nations are now seeking to resedy, and this
fact, as woll as the absorbing interest of us
all say justify a brief diagnosis this ovening.
The United States bee acme advantages which
other peoples have not; it labors under some
difficulties which hardly exist elsewhere.
1.
There is no thousand-year foud between the United
States and any powerful rival; and there are vast stretches
of cheap lands for the unexployed who have the energy to
go to them. And for more than a hundred years our popula-
tion has beca more mobile than that of any other country.
Yet it any be doubted whether sconomic recovery there will
be casier than is Germany, for the circumstances are peou-
liar. To understand $bese, I venture a brief survey of
European-Assrican relations: The real significance of the
discovery of America for Europe was free 800000 to vast,
new areas and the exploitation of enorsous mineral deposits.
In all the war-produced crises of the past, the sore ambi-
tious of the starving Europeans migrated at great risk in
hundred-ton boats to the now land. The breakdown of agratian
foudalism in the seventeenth and eightsenth conturies re-
leased even greater numbers of "underdogs" for American
development. The North American part of the now world thue
becase
- a -
became a sort of *paradise* for the arbitious and unemployed:
there overy froeman who could pay Nie way noross the Atlantic
had fifty to a hundred acree of wild land crowded with gase,
for bis tomporary support; and the still greater number of
indestured servants who crossed the ocean were likewise
guaranteed free homesteads at the end of their terms of
service. Nor vas it possible for European overlords of
America to deny their emigrating folk that personal liberty
which all rational ⑉ derand. Lave and regulations restrain-
ing men's freedom simply could not be enforced. Here vas
a great soral force in all western coonomic life till free
lands is the United States were exhausted in 1893. The ab-
sence of this factor is a basic cause of the unprecedented
disaster which DOW surrounds us all,
IL
Another and a stranger influence operates now to
theart offorts at recovery overywhere. Since 1870 the sense
of personal independence on the part of the nasses of uroan
folk has declined. Amazing inventions and the changing tastes
and desires of NOD have set now standards. One sust live is
a city now to be a decent oitizen. Be loves the roar and
racket of the factory, the crowded street and the baseball
field; be must look at the movie screens as often as possi-
bie, and ride on the crowded trolley on Sunday to
ate the misfortune of bie degenerate cousin who still labore
on the land. The city worker prefere ao attic in a crowded,
filthy "West or East Side* to the independence of a country
hose
- oz win Lan
suare 04931 (LOSSE
& to
- a -
home with family, forest and animals about his. The daily
paper and the radio hardly suffice. The idea that the
ownership of & stretch of land makes one free and even
aristocratic hardly exists anywhere. For a thousand years
ownership of land vas a title to distinction. And since
half the people of the United States and three-fourths of
those of Germany live in the city, most of whom would
rather beg their bread on the streets than carn 11 on the
land, President Roosevelt and Chancellor Hitler have a
second and basic hostile force to deal with, There is no
scre free land and few people would take 11 if there were.
or equal importance is the strange practice of
all nations in barring their gates against imsigrants and
foreign goods. One of the causes of this attitude these
last dooades is the natural jualousy of organized labor
overywhere, especially in the United States. The leadors
of organized workers think of applying the sace privilege
for thomselves and their supportore that the directors of
great corporations have demanded for thosselves - monopolise
of the profits of the greater industries. Organized labor
demands a dollar an hour for urban workers, while its
leaders are quite content that the country worker receives
only a dollar a day.
This demand of organized labor, supported by
organized business, has resulted in industrial states olos-
ing their doors to imaigrants and to outside goods. These
working people forget that immigrante from all the more
advanced nations invariably take their savings with them,
put these savings to work in the new country and thus help
not
curreny
E
person 4159
- 4 -
set the mills to going. Although as immigrant on a small
fars might reduce the home dowand for foodstuffs, he would
increase the domand for industrial goods, and this increased
dewand for urban goods causes a growing consumption of fars
products in the cities. The issigrant of past spechs who
abandoned bio country and took bis savings to a now land
reduced unemployment at hose, added to stemmship and rail-
way activity on his way west, sot up now demands for 1a-
ported goods in the new habitat and thus helped all parties
to recovery from historic depressions: 1819-1846, 1873-1877.
At the present mozent all industrial countries are clossi
to imaigrants and heavily taxed against freedom of travel.
How difficult it is to cross international borders today!
with lands unavailable, unacceptable, and the movement of
population almost probibited, the present depression is
NOTO fixed than those following the Napolsonic, the Civil
and the Franco-Prussian wars.
Two other unprecedented licitations to worldwide
recovery are obvious: 1. The industrialisation of England,
the United States, Germany and France has been paralled with
a most extraordinary application of machines to production.
This has, during recent decades, released hundrede of
thousands of workers per year. Even in 1928-29 there were
two million unemployed in the United States. 2. Since 1870
ODO effect of machine production and urban conditions of
life has been a declining birth rate, while acre and better
physicians have prolonged the average of life so that poo-
ple a20 no longer advised to take chloroferm at sixty. There
are four tizes so many people over sixty years of age as
formerly;
200400 ade reserved
the eyts Income
not no 27770 20
- a -
formerly; and they show no disposition to get out of the
way of their younger fellows. The best authorities on
social statistics say that in 1970 the populations of all
industrial countries will begine to decline, if present
influences continue; and there will be increasing numbers
of unemployed and of decrepit folk who pay doctors good
fees to keep then alive.
Finally, under modern individual and corporate
freedom, sen have built vast canal systems at a ocst of
billions of the popular savings. These canala were promptly
paralled by railroads which took away their traffic -
withose the Erie and the Pennsylvania canal systems. Than
the railroads were in large measure antiquated by motor
cars, buses and trucks; and now the flying machine receives
vast governmental grants for taking the mails away from the
railroads which also receive heavy subventions not to let
the flyers have their pouches. Moreover, the railroads
focussed their traffic in a few great centres; they did this
contrary to popular opinion. This increased the value of
urban land a hundredfold. The effects of these and other
influences centered all great industry and world finance in
the same favored cities; and railway, bank and other dir-
eators of the industrial age, masters of world centres,
assumed airs of ancient conarobs and raised
almost beyond normal vision, which & visit to Now York will
amply reveal. The result was the sale of something like a
hundred billions of railway, industrial and skyscraper stock
to & misguided public - securities which had no substantial
basis of real property. The earning power of the ------ was
wholly
Card
- 5 -
shelly unequal to the payment of promised dividends. The
people of the United States thus carried an unbearable
load of worthless, fraudulent debt in 1920. I suspect
other industrial peoples bore sisilar burdens. And oven
more aeasing, American industrialists raised import duties
in 1922 and again in 1930 to levels which almost closed
their markets to the outside world. And having barred in-
ports, they loaned Europeans and Latin Americans billions
of dollars so they could buy American exports. They would
ruin other peoples and then lend the ruined peoples money
to buy goods and put more bad securities on their own nar-
ket!
There had never been anything like this in all
known history. The collapse of 1929 was predicted and
warned against by the most eminent economic and historical
authorities overywhere. Governmental authorities gave no
heed.
It was the end of the ora. The free lands of
three conturies were gone; the right of peoples to sigrate
from country to country was abolished; there was no longer
a seablance of free trade; and when outstanding statement
sought to associate all the differing peoples in a 00-
operative oconomic life and abolish ware as the causes of
the greatest disastere, there were great outeries of opposi-
tion, All the old co-operative forces were gone and nobody
was willing to introduce new ones.
III.
After four years of unprecedented distross; after
Sasuel
beokye oz 715 Date
Visa I
- 7 -
Samuel Insull's two-billion-dollar holding company 001-
lapsed and he had hastened away on & flying machine; when
other vast corporation values shrunk from three-fourths
to nine-tenths of former values, millions of seall inves-
tors *020 in desparate straits, there Came a national
eloction. It gave unprocedented sajorities in nearly all
the States to Franklin Recsovelt - a leader of the party
of Thomas Jefferson which had cose baok to life at a sost
critical moment. That could be done?
The Federal Constitution is a balanced instrument
of most limited powers, and all executive functions are
subject to legislative and judicial approval. Only is time
of var say a President take prompt and decisive action.
Lingoln violated the Constitution to save the Union, and
Wilson sometimes transcended his powers for the obvious
comuon good, though actual violations of the fundamental
law were not a part of his practice. Night non interpret
the events of March 1933 as warlike?
In the chaotic situation, with banks closing their
doors everywhere, President Roosevelt acted as if be were
in a state of var. Re declared a bank holiday and bastened
the assemblying of congress. Excitement was overywhere as
great as in 1917. Senators and Representatives recognized
the urge of the hour; out they also felt the pull of the
American Legion and the pressure of local demands. It was
a situation which legislators are apt to convert into an
ispasse, witness the panicky times of Andrew Jackson and
Grover Cleveland when all Presidential action was defented.
But Roosevelt had converted his long struggle for recovering
are
yourse
- 8 -
his health into a ton-year study of history and oconomics.
He had learned how sen behaved in past orises.
He hold conferences with the greater committees
of both housee of Congress; be consulted exports on sub-
joots on which expert opinion was needful; he coaxed somi-
hostile nowepaper folk to delay their opposition; and be
postponed appointments to ten thousand offices in which
more politicians were interested. It was a human picture,
& Jefferson urging Southerners to abolish slavery, lest
they thomsolves be abolished; a Wilson urging voz to end
var. And Roosevelt vas successful. A banking las was snacted
which gave the Federal Government powers which cust paralyse
all state systems. A control over the issue of securities
was enacted which would probably have prevented the depres-
sion if applied in 1921-20. The farmers of the Yest were
told in legal form how such wheat they sight plant; and
cotton growere were ordered to plow up ten million acree
of the 1933 crop. If railroads were to operate, their cana-
gera must submit to orders from the White House. The whole
economic life of the country was taken in hand upon mandates
voted by both houses of Congress. There had never been any-
thing like it before, but DOCO way to recovery sust be
sought, else even greater catastrophe than that of 1929
night come. It vas not revolution as sen are prone to say. It
was a popular expension of governmental powers beyond all con-
stitutional grants; and nearly all men everywhere hope the
President may succeed. If he 1. able to put half the unemploy-
4d back to work; if the now banking law and corporation control
yield half the desired results, the cause of democracy and per-
sonal liberty say survive the onslaughte of our times.
---
Enclosure No. 1
Address delivered by Ambassador
William E. Dodd at Luncheon of
American Chamber of Commerce in
Germany, Berlin, October 12,1933.
ECONOMIC NATIONALISM
In times of great stress men are too apt to abandon
too much of their past social devices and venture too far
upon unchartered courses. And the consequence has always
been reaction, sometimes disaster. With the breakdown of
the old Roman democracy after the enormous success of the
Punic Wars, great group leaders contending for personal and
group advantages brought the Republic to the verge of ool-
lapse. Then a Caesar rose, asserted autooratic powers and
for a time stabilized society. The great fact BO appealed
to Gibbon that he wrote the masterpiece of all historical
work. He overlooked or under-emphasized the cruelties and
the outside exploitation of his golden empire. I allude
to this because human governmental and economic combina-
tions have always appeared under a few patterns and both
philosophers and politicians waver and hesitate between
the models offered in & Cato, a Gracohus or a Julius Cae-
sar and the ideals which these figures oonnote. There are
not many forms of human association - though many new names
have been invented from time to time. Half-educated states-
men today swing violently away from the ideal purpose of
the first Gracchus and think they find salvation for their
troubled fellows in the afbitrary modes of the man who
fell an easy victim to the cheap devices of the lewd Cleo-
patra. They forget that the Gracchus democracy failed upon
the
- a -
the narrowest of margine and the Caesars suooseded only
for a short moment as measured by the test of history.
II.
As in anoient timos, 80 in modern. When the Spanish
dumping of shiploads of South American gold and silver per
year into the medieval complex of economic Europe, and
prices, wages and currency values got as much out of all
control as they are today, men cast about wildly for remod-
10s, There has rarely been more chaotic times in human history
than those of the hundred years which followed the discovery
of America and the religious reforms of Martin Luther. No
nation's existence was half secure; no sconomic class rested
upon a sure foundation; peasants wandered aimlessly about
their countries, starving by the hundrede of thousands; and
city proletarians were everywhere ready to turn pirates upon
the seas or mercenary soldiers upon the land. When Queen
Elizabeth died in 1603 England was confronted with imminent
chaos, and forty-five years later France was in even worse
plight, though victorious in the Thirty Years' Nar. No must
not think our generation is the only one that has suffered
from violent economic and social disruptions. The Puritan
fathers thought to re-distribute the benefits of government
and make England a model land; the Fronde ricters of France
and Paris thought to anticipate the revolution of 1789.
III.
Out of these chaotic eras there came two try-outs
of
not a
eye DOLLO
- 3 -
of economic nationalism, applied by autocratio methods.
The first system was worked out by the marvelous little
group of statesmen that surrounded Charles II. In 1660-1673
the aged Earl of Clarendon, a politician and a master histor-
ian, aided by the unscrupulous Duke of Buckingham, the canny
Lord Arlington and the profiteer Duke of Albemarle, worked
out a marvelous system which was to save England and fit all
the trans-Atlantic colonies into a water-tight system. It
was unlawful to ship a pound of gold out of the country. No
foreign goods were to be imported except upon a sort of quota
system. A monopoly market was created for sugar, tobacco and
ship timber, produced in the colonies. All "quota" imports
from the colonies were taxed at two to four times their
producers' value to enable the government to Agnore public
opinion and collect taxes without the consent of the peo-
ple. Merchants and manufacturers were authorized to sell
their goods to the public at prices fixed by themselves.
And surplus products were to be dumped upon the continen-
tal market at half the prices paid at home. It was a nar-
velously perfect scheme under which workere on the land
were to have no return at all for their labor, landlords
somewhat more and industrialists and traders princely pro-
fits. His Majesty, Charles II, was to be autocratio master
of the system and make war upon Holland, the one rival and
free-trade advocate which might upset the scheme.
But no scheme has ever worked well more than a
decade or two without popular support, and when the King
had beaten Holland in 1674 and annexed all strategic
points in North America, the crafty Earl of Shaftsbury,
counselled
1PA trans
of coopos
- 4 -
counselled by the canny John Locke, moved into the slums
of London, organized groups of shouting, hurrahing fol-
lowers, gained control of a parliament which could not
longer be postponed and brought the cheap autocrat's
life to a miserable end in 1684; and the long subdued
lower middle classes of the country united with the new
aristooracy and made the unloved William III of Holland
King of England. All the larger cities and more develop-
ed shires, supported by the angry colonies from Maesachu-
setts to South Carolina, shouted loud hurrahe. It was the
"glorious revolution," hardly a score of lives lost in the
process! All the strenuous decrees of Charles II became
dead letters which no one seriously heeded. Seventy years
later when George III tried to revemp the system, the
colonies revolted and started a world commotion which
lasted thirty years. Stuart economic nationalism had
failed.
IV,
The English had hardly launched their scheme
before John Baptiste Colbert, master statesman about
Louis XIV, contrived a better system for the perfect
government of France. Son of a mere trader of Rheims,
he invented a pedigree which proved himself to be of
noble birth, and he managed to get it to the snobbish
young monarch. That was enough. He was granted despotic
powers. He dispossessed hundrede of great families of
newly rich folk, handed their properties over to the
Crown, condemned thousands to death because they resisted
him,
of poop
- 5 -
his, and so re-adjusted taxes that Louis henceforth had
income enough to wage war when he would, and, at the
same time, pension every promising leader or emerging
writer, not excluding scores in Germany and Spain. The
recalcitrant landed aristocracy was everywhere subdued,
parliaments were not allowed to assemble, while the now-
rich and all the talent of the time were allowed to bask
in the sunshine of the royal presence. The young monarch
rose to unparalleled eminence in Europe and Colbert applied
by decree an import-export system like that of England.
Nothing could come in except upon approval and the payment
of high tariffs. Every surplus, except gold, must go out
at whatever prices could be obtained. A third class like
that of England aross. Monopoly privileges prevailed every-
where. A countryman who objected to aristocratic hunters
running over his ripe wheat fields was simply shot like a
pheasant or a partridge. France was wonderfully organized
from the top-like Augustus Caesar's reorganized Rome. There
was not a popular assembly in a hundred and forty years,
and terrorizing wars were the order of the time 1666-7,
1672-6, 1683-7, 1690-97, 1701-13. France was perfectly
pyramided at home and on the continent. The glamor of Ver-
sailles was seen and imitated all over Germany, while
thousands of men rotted in French prisons because they had
ventured to protest; and peasant farmers reached so low an
estate that, like North American Indians, they lived off
roots and herbs or died unwept along the roadside, as they
do today in & great minority government of our time.
It was the economic nationalism which "had saved
France
- 6 -
France after the chaotic days of Masarin." However, it
collapsed in 1789 with a crash and & thunder which rever-
berated for a score of years all over the world. Thus the
best laid schemes of Bourbon autocrate failed as dismally
as that of their Stuart cousins. Governments from the top
fail as often as those from the bottom; and every great
failure brings a sad social reaction, thousands and mil-
lions of helpless men laying down their lives in the un-
happy process. Why may not statesmen study the past and
avoid such catastrophes?
L
When Napoleon I came to his end in 1815, a great
world congress had set everything to rights in Vienna and
told everybody how to behave for a hundred years; but
soon came the accustomed chaos in victorious as well as
defeated countries. From 1818 to 1846 there was depression;
here and there, overywhere, as now the markete of Europe,
except for cotton, were dead for young America, and
Europe was distracted by debte and new revolutions. Would
mankind never learn the effects of wars?
In far-off Kentucky a lean, lanky, half-educated
but clever orator, Henry Clay, worked out in 1823 another
economic nationalism. He would bar the ports of the United
States against cheap but excellent European goods, asso-
ciate all Latin-American peoples with those of his own
country, create huge markets by building cities, roadways
and canals and leave the builders of the new industry and
the new-old banking system the utmost freedom in exploiting
their
- 7 -
their fellows. It was an unconscious imitation of the
English and the French systems of the seventeenth century -
the fussy, cantankerous John Randolph was about the only
member of Congress who know enough of history to give
Clay's so-called "American system" its proper European
name. Clay fought long and hard, always dreaming of the
Presidency for himself, Daniel Webster and the unscrupu-
lous bank president, Nicholas Biddle, his ablest lieuten-
ants. He was defeated by the rising cotton kingdom in the
South and it was left to the troubled Abraham Lincoln, in
the midst of a great var, 1881-64, to grant industrialists
and bankers all that the dead Clay had promised them. The
economic nationalism which Benjamin Franklin and George
Mason had feared and warned Washington against was now
firmly fixed on "free American soil" and its success was
far greater than that of Clarendon or Colbert. England,
France and Germany had, after long debates, adopted in the
main the Adam Smith philosophy on which the Americans had
gone to war in 1776. That is, Europe had adopted the ideals
of Young America and opened their markets in order to
sell their growing industrial output to the far corners
of the world. The United States had adopted the attitude
of Europe in 1776 and closed their vast domestic market
while they sold billions of dollars worth of foodstuffs
to England, France and Germany. There had never been any-
thing like it in all history. England and Germany developed
more in fifty years than either of them had developed in
the preceding five hundred years. It was the machine age,
and populations increased faster than machines. Cyrus
McCormick
reast edd
ENETTER
stade
- 8 -
MoCormick, & Virginia inventor, showed American farmers
how to grow wheat at thirty cents a bushel and produce
meat at two cents a pound. And American farmers, aided by
free land and new machines, drove British and German farmers
out of business and orowded them on to emigrant boats bound
for the farms of the great West. "Everybody was getting rich."
But the masters of industry, of railroads and banks
managed to pooket nearly all the profits and there came a
depression and an outory which all but enabled the young 7.
J. Bryan to work a revolution in 1896. He failed on a nar-
row margin through bribed votes, and the system was sus-
tained in wobbly estate till Europe went to war in 1914 as
France had done in 1805. The outcome all the world knows.
The marvelous American system seemed successful when it was
not, and the Presidents of 1921-28 with their optimistic
Secretary of the Treasury thought it a sort of millennium
which must rapidly cover the earth. To this dream a later
President added the prophesy that poverty, the curse of
mankind, would be abolished when he took his seat in the
mansion on Pennsylvania Avenue!
VI.
But the collapse came in 1939; it was almost as
terrible as that of 1789 in Paris. The hopeful, buoyant
United States now fell into the economic chaos into which
the great war had thrust all the states of Europe. The
unemployed outnumbered the dead and wounded of the recent
struggle. In place of Hoover's universal and everlasting
prosperity, there was threat of universal poverty. The
American
por 10 DE
ROCOZPTO
- 9 -
American economic nationalism the dangers of which
Franklin and Mason had foreseen in 1787, had run its
course - as had the schemes of Clarendon and Colbert.
In conclusion one may safely say that it would
be no sin if statesmen learned enough of history to rea-
lize that no system which implies control of society by
privilege seekers has ever ended in any other way than
collapse. The wisest of all American statesmen insisted
all his life that the way to develop the ideal social
order was to leave every man the utmost freedom of ini-
tiative and action and always to forbid any man or group
of men to profiteer at the expense of others. May we not
reasonably expect of statesmen of today a sufficient
knowledge of the blunders of the past to realize that if
western civilization is to survive, they must find a way
to avoid the crime and the terrific disasters of war; they
must learn how to develop in a friendly spirit the resources
of undeveloped regions of the world; they must lower, not
raise, the barriers against the migration of surplus popu-
lations; and they must facilitate, and not defeat, the
interchange of surplus goods - with these rational changes
of international procedure, a higher culture might easily
be carried to the masses of men everywhere; without these,
another war and chaos.
Note
The material in this letter
also a appears'm Hombassadar
Ilodd's Iliary, pp 90-91, pub. 1941,
Harcount, Brace.
PSF: Dodd
of
plu
Berlin, November 27,1933.
Confiductial
Dear Mr. President:
I am preparing a somewhat careful
analysis of the ruling trio here with a view to more
accurate understanding in the State Department as to
the situation. As I can not get the report off in
today's pouch, I am taking the liberty of summarizing
it to you.
Your remark in your letter of the 13th
about the eight percent of the world's population de-
feating ninety-two percent in their peaceful objectives
leads me to think that you might possibly profit from
this summary.
The Hitler regime is composed of three
rather inexperienced and very dogmatic persons, all of
whom have been more or less connected with murderous
undertakings in the last eight or ten years. It is a
combination of men who represent different groups of
the present German majority (not an actual majority).
Hitler, now about 45, was an orphan at 13, went through
the war without promotion or decorations, 80 much wor-
shipped here, and who had very curious experiences in
Munich between 1919 and 1923. He is romantic-minded,
half-informed about great historical figures in Germany,
and he was for a number of years a strict imitator of
Mussolini. He rose to power by organizing elements in
Germany which were partly unemployed and wholly indig-
nant because Germany had not won the great war. His
devices are the devices which men set up in ancient
Rome, namely, his flag and salute. He has definitely
said on a number of occasions that a people survives
by fighting and dies through peaceful policies. His
influence is and has been wholly belligerent. The last
six
The President,
The White House,
Washington, D.C.
- a -
six or eight months he has made many, many announcements
of peaceful purpose, and at the time being, and I think
he is perfectly sincere and is consequently willing to
negotiate with France. However, in the back of his mind
is the old German idea of dominating Europe through war-
fare.
Hitler's first lieutenant is Joseph Goebbels,
some ten years younger, a miniature figure who was not
engaged in the war but who imbibed the bitterness against
France and the rest of the world during that long struggle.
After the war he engaged in organizing belligerent groups
in western Germany and took every possible occasion to
challenge the old Socialist regime which submitted to the
Treaty of Versailles. He joined Hitler and made constant
declarations that the German people, once united, would
domineer the world. While Hitler is a fair orator as German
oratory goes, Goebbels is a past master. He makes a point
of stirring animosities and hatreds whenever there is
opportunity, and he has combined all the newspaper, radio,
publications and art activities of Germany into one vast
propaganda machine. Through these agencies he is bent upon
forcing all Germans into one solid phalanx. He is far
cleverer than Hitler, much more belligerent, and, I am
told, always refuses to have contacts with foreigners.
The third member of this triumvirate is Hermann
Goering, about forty, who comes from South Germany, and
who was involved, as Goebbels also, in the early Putsch
movement in Munich; was a fugitive from justice for some
months while Hitler was in jail, and became intensely
violent against all democratic and socialist groups. His
wife died as a result of exposure while they were both
fugitives from justice. The liberal-socialist government
issued pardons for Hitler and Goering about the same time
and they recommenced their belligerent agitations about
1926-27. While Goebbels represents something approaching
a communistic body of German opinion (mobilized against
official Communism), Goering represents a more aristocratic
and Prussian Germanism. He is not without support amonget
the larger business interests. He had & marvelous exper-
ience during the war as an aviator and became as intensely
war-like as either Goebbels or Hitler. He is the Prussian
Minister President, and has mobilized all the old Prussian
extremists
- 3 -
expremists and militarists on behalf of the existing
regime.
You have, therefore, a unique triumvirate. Hitler,
less educated, more romantic, with a semi-criminal record;
Goebbels and Goering, both Doctors of Philosophy, both
animated by intense class and foreign hatreds and both
willing to resort to most ruthless arbitrary methods. Each
of the three has a body of support necessary for the main-
tenance of the present regime. They do not love each other,
but in order to maintain their power, they have to sit down
together. I do not think there has ever been in modern
history such a unique group. There was such a group in
ancient Rome, and you probably recall what happened. You
may see, therefore, something of the problem you have to
deal with, and also some of the reasons why a man of my
background might be doubtful of any early success.
Sincerely yours,
William E.D.dd
PSF: i Dodd
P. Barl
Dodd folder
December 23, 1933
Dear Ken. President:
Perhaps you won't
object to a belated new years
greeting from This centre of arbi-
have fovernment. you must know
you have our ardens good wishas. you
have already done a great work; beet
it's gives to take more chan form
years to a uply your system and os
usual leadership in in seriously handicapped,
perhaps necessarity on the whole, by
fired elections. Key proplesy is hat
you will have no difficulty object on that
score. If you go not I hope you
will recaste State Department
groupings a little. There are clienes
who jespardize the service by far-
uring rich personal friends and Rins.
folk. wa are suffering from such a
rulning here son. I would like to
Knne you had given a reandate
to the Secretary to stop facoritions
and if necessary re-assign persons
who make Trouble. In my judg.
ment new recruits should not
be taken in nhon any but bases
of out merit; till the perhaps present new service form people Rept
can be arranged according to mer,
it; and after chis let same of the
higher posts so to very best service
new, with new blood at critical
centres. this might over.come
present social strut misance. & am
not ophosed to normal social contacts,
but against reasing sunselves redice
Lous minitating Louisxis I believe
budget might be reduced by one-fourth
and Serice improved.
as to present statms of German-French
amament negotiax uns, I want to
say: 9 do not fall for English propositions
without consideration. They made unwise
commitments in FarEast from which
leaders - at least the ambassador here-
wish to escape. the french are stand-
ing too strabormly against are concessions
to Germany. - especially Herrist. strangely
the Eurnan foreign Secretary expresses
great concern oven clauger of Japaness
attack upon Russia.
about January 7 to 10 English
will be making tentative proposition
to you. my analysis is that if jou wood
set English aud French together and
put Through present Term year pact
tied on to similar pact for far East,
you might do what own great friend,
Wiesm, failed do: actmally stare
world on road to peaceful negotiations
in place of and no 1 6 to war. you can
purhaps Gims Barah, Johnson and Me adoo
to agree if they understand insurance
United in Far qast
If you ean not get actual agreements
from England and France, Italy, Ber
many, Poland and Russia, autocratic
powers, will milte on French-Balkan
frohlens and leave For East to ms
alone. Change of Gerenan attitude as
to Polard and Russia is abidens here.
If This sort oza fact is agreed to, it
wait be pake gue very long. Perhaps
9 am wronsi but smah is my nucture
judgement- nor am I N
"British"
fours Sincerely
William E. Dodd
PSF: Germany Dodd
Feby. 8, 1934
Dear His President:
the daily and tlmost hourly
conferences and calls due to the presence of
hunerican, English and Swise Bond deligations
caused me to overlook the opportunity optiming
our congratulations on the accasion 75your
5'24d birthday. Bmt you numst know That
, am now, as I have long been, grateful
as a citizen and " co. wother to you for
what you are and the mainmental wom
you have Ime This last Jean. If there
is a moment of time to spare let me
drawell for a moment on same point,
3 comm concom
The Forman Inionce and Economics authorities
here are nm and hare been quite aware of the
wrong involved Their milnings. I have had'seltos"
with all responsible parties. Schacht finally he-
clared me that he had never favored the
discriminations. There are really two groups
princtioning here: one = composed of 7 oreign of
fice, Reichsbark and
the ather of The curins combination of Nitter, forms
and Goabbels who hardly know hire in am inter-
national opinion to recorm with. The President
stands alouf, but he is fully conseions of in-
Trantional trends and casts his influence the
right way, as & think, when decisions are left
to him- as happens suite often mm.
In in of above facts, 9 ful that the Bond
matter was decided as were as we couldhave
hoped for. One thing went " long way: four
armand personal unitude which was prouphly
However, th 6% and 7% in Twest
rates which our new form bankers fixed are
regarded here as for too high; and one tariff rates
Branking for aut 1930 state are of regarded thrugs: all as largely other countries responsible having
initated other
I am enclosing A dipping from Paris Fribure
just to show you how four sujgestims is are taken
m this side. It is my opinion that The onlyneal
solution to our economic Lilenma, is, 4 shon Trans-
for of some millions of people from the industrial
centres, artificially brief nf by too protection tar
iff, and corporate railway miscom centration. We
forgot Inferson's dicture that no man The or grant
must be allowed to proference and now profit
eens, as well as the rest ogus, are paging the penalty.
However, it is n no easy job to trues for nuclling
and missadureated city for to amall farms are
ab out the country. you can to it by Regrees and
as perially after you earry the election 71934
as for will. and you rumt also
carry the election 77936. that will frutt Jan
where Jefferson was in 1808-06 when he attaccad
in very cantions way two great trablems: The preten.
sions of the courts [marshace] which were almoady lined
up for commercial privilege and The slavocracy,
suddenly grown purerful, due to 30c cotton. He delayed
his great tusk till he hed all purve; but were he was
cle feated [reasons never mad, clear in Our history].
she neasons were new, was in Europetrapolean at Ans-
terlits] and the of Democrats in the south who
should have agreed grotual abolition! One The
greatest of betwn, every state but Two behins Thin, was
defeated in one of the greatest and wisest Imores!
you will say: Why so discouraging? I replythat
under am unique system Presidents of the greatest
sincerely and highest talents have lost in Thengih
and 7th yeans: Inferson and wreson; Jackson Lincoln
and Cheveland never able to carry Thin purposes.
you have what Inferson had : perfect confidence of
The masses. you have who more difficult problem,
nobod, in are history a more difficult one. The Krited
States must stabilize on fair economic basis; it
mumt then become a world Gaten. If you can
redistribute propulation. open world markets, put
all hanks under control and then show Emrope
from to stop barbarism Than, you will have won the
gratitude of the ages. I think you can to it, if me
was break, mt and you ruanaje nyt two clee
tions wishes successfully. Pandm so long a story. all good
Junes Sincerely William E. Dodd
Dear 90 THEMTRASSE
2H7 TO some
-
If the President wishes further
information, I think State Department
could give it.
Please let Auto people know I
want to see proper person about a
car.
wm E Dodd
11
[11934 ?]
The Pooposed Erman Commission
5
about The 20th of February Dr Schacht
of The Suman national Bank, dictator of German finance came
to see me and bared The situation of his country in a way
which businean Band representatives had not learned-
though They learned runch.
Schacht said There was Then [and a cabinet crisis
about The subject was narronly avert] a trem dans pressure
for going of the fold standard for Trade purposes; but
That he would never assent because of The different sitn-
ation there from that in the nuited States. I inferred that
he would resign if the policy were changed.
2
But in The hope of carrying m snecessfully through the
spring, he proposed a saleme for temporary staying of
Band stmation while Bermany waved greatly increase cotton
purchases from ms and make deals [thmght to be Indiable] to
sell industrial output in Latin america. I submitted
his scheme to state Department. His fear then, and
will greater when D left Berlin, was That Eerman
balance, would set worse before The middle of april
when another Bord conference is to meet. The hope of
improving the sitmation was promised in the passage of the Presidents
3
mandate for tariff u-adjustruents- daily watched in Sumary
Schucht simply wished Smoh improving prospects with sos
as would enable him to avoid further defauers at the Conference
in april.
about march /, the German Foreign office assidne
to talk user possibility of a Commission to Washington
for the purpose of readjusting trade agreements. 9
tras thed the Commission was about to be appoints)
and 8 was asked what I thought of the individuals
suggested. It looked to be a 800d committee, no harty
or personal chiefs- simply first class me who, 9 thought,
4
want make food impression in Washington BMT 9 at mee
afrised delay in sending them. They were to have sailed
march 9. my advice was to wait till Congress acted
and a eable be sent from the State Departm ent, further
had heen advising wichout special reference -6 this paint
it or from their This was agreed to and sre-
partid to Washington There were further unversations and
I appointed set agricultural atdachi Steene to
maxing acquaintance with proposed commission
members and also to SAMDY carions commercial inter-
ests and difficulties so that, in case of need, he might
5
be called to washington to assist in nejotiat ins
when they be f an.
Saturday night March 10, German J reig n
Secretary, on new ath, was et mg house and 2e-
part 10 that he had been authorized by the Chan
celler to send commission Whenever washington was
mady- - he afain discussed personnel. He also revealed
unsiderable auxiety lest helay might precipitate
economic trouble to in Fermany shough not close
friends, he and Schacht were of the same mind
2was certain, therefore, that the Serman authorities
6
here marinous unanirmous in the view that a great deal Replads
on negotions of new Suman american trade relations;
and 9 promission neurath to to what I could to expedite
matters
my suggestion would,therefore, be to expedite
Gumar matter as som as possible, for it is highly
important to have the Commission arean here before
Bow conference meets in Berlin the fact of
negotiations being under way and txt existence
of friendly economic relations which could be ad.
vartised in sumary would have great influence in
7
revenuing confidence and avoiding Corn plate default on
interest payments. In mg judgment a suspension
of payments in Miric would & most harmful
here and the fail nre of At commercial improvements
with Ms wants certainly make may I Ialways a daugerons
day in sermany] more eritical.
We must not accume that Schacht is willing
he defands. 206 is not. Ne wishes to shm us that Ser-
many is not another Trance. are thoughtful Serman,
indicate same attitude. They are amoine to please no.
8
The Germans to wish lower Rates of interest; and
our Baurer delegate, agree that 6 and , % is
too high for bonds teed on our markets when few
hunerian securities hay more than K % these Days.
There are other points involved; but these are
the main ones. If we ean aet prompt by and in
conciliatory spirit we may save both people,
from great lasses. 9 had a long take with Wither
on march 7 and he is deeply interested
The Proposed German Commission
About the 20th of February, Dr. Schacht of the German National
Bank, dictator of German finance, came to see me and bared the situation
of his country in a way which American bond representatives had not
learned, though they learned much.
Schacht said there was then (and a cabinet crisis about the
subject was narrowly avert) a tremendous pressure for going off the gold
standard for trade purposes; but that he would never assent because of
the different situation there from that in the United States. I inferred
that he would resign if the policy were changed. But in the hope of
carrying on successfully through the spring, he proposed a scheme for
temporary staying of bond situation while Germany would greatly increase
cotton purchases from us and make deals (thought to be probable) to sell
industrial output in Latin America. I submitted his scheme to State
Department. His fear then, and even greater when I left Berlin, was
that German balances would get worse before the middle of April when
another bond conference is to meet. The hope of improving the situation
was promised in the passage of the President's mandate for tariff re-
adjustments-daily watched in Germany. Schacht simply wished such
improving prospects with us as would enable him to av_oid further defaults
at the Conference in April.
About March 1, the German Foreign Office asked me to talk over
possibility of a Commission to Washington for the purpose of readjusting
trade agreements. I was told that the Commission was about to be appointed
and I was asked what I thought of the individuals suggested. It looked
to be a good committee, no party or personal chiefs, simply first class
men, who I thought would make good impression in Washington. But I at
once advised delay in sending them. They were to have sailed March 9.
My advice was to wait till Congress acted and a cable be sent from the
State Department or from their Ambassador. This was agreed to and I
reported to Washington. There were further conversations and I set
Agricultural Attache Steere(?) to making acquaintance with proposed
commission members and also to study various commercial interests and
difficulties so that, in case of need, he might be called to Washington
to assist in negotiations when they begin.
- 2 -
Saturday night, March 10, German Foreign Secretary, von Neurath, was
at my house and reported that he had been authorized by the Chancellor to
send Commission whenever Washington was ready -- he again discussed personnel.
He also revealed considerable anxiety lest delay might precipitate economic
trouble in Germany. Though not close friends, he and Schacht were of the
same mind. I was certain, therefore, that the German authorities were
unanimous in the view that a great deal depends on negotiations of new
German-American trade relations; and I promised von Neurath to do what I
could to expedite matters.
My suggestion would, therefore, be to expedite German matter as soon
as possible, for it is highly important to have the Commission over here
before Bond conference meets in Berlin. The fact of negotiations being
under way and existence of friendly economic relations which could be
advertised in Germany would have great influence in renewing confidence and
in avoiding complete default on interest payments. In my judgment a
suspension of payments in April would be most harmful here and the failure
of commercial improvements with us would certainly make May 1 (always a
dangerous day in Germany) more critical.
We must not assume that Schacht is willing to default. He is not.
He wishes to show us that Germany is not another France. All thoughtful
Germans indicate same attitude. They are anxious to please us. The Germans
do wish lower rates of interest; and our Banker delegates agree that 6 and 7%
is too high for bonds on our markets when few American securities pay more
than 4% these days.
There are other points involved; but these are the main ones. If we
can act promptly and in conciliatory spirit we may save both peoples from
great losses. I had a long talk with Hitler on March 7 and he is deeply
interested.
PSF: 900
Boad
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
June 16, 1934.
Dear Mr. President:
I enclose for your information copy of a telegram
which I am sending to Ambassador Dodd in Berlin, regard-
ing the recent debt action taken by Germany.
During the negotiations between representatives
of the American bondholders and the German officials
over the past few weeks at Berlin, we have made suitable
representations on various occasions in support of the
rights of our nationals and especially in the matter
of any possible discrimination against them. This I
did again in conversation with the German Ambassador
here, both some days ago and as late as yesterday.
Faithfully yours,
Enclosure:
Correctful
Copy of telegram.
The President,
The White House.
COPY
June 16, 1934.
AMEMBASSY
BERLIN (GERMANY)
Please take the earliest occasion to see Von
Neurath or a ranking official in the Foreign Office
and state orally that you have been instructed by your
Government to protest energetically and formally against
the recent summary independent action of Germany in
respect to her external debts, which seriously affects
our Government and its nationals. The American Govern-
ment takes occasion to express its strongest regret
that new losses are thereby imposed on American citizens,
and that debtor-creditor relationships have been further
impaired.
I purpose to inform the press on Monday of the
general tenor of the foregoing.
In regard to the question of discrimination against
American investors that has been brought to the front
by the developments mentioned in your 112, of June 16,
please state to the German Government that this Govern-
ment would view with disapproval any and all develop-
ments in this situation under which its investors
receive
- 2 -
receive poorer treatment than investors of other
countries, and would be called upon to protest any such
disorimination. The spectacle of having not only to
accept losses but to perceive payments to investors of
other nationalities at their expense would arouse
immediate resentment among the numerous American investors.
As regards further statements of Foreign Office
transmitted in your 112, if the German Government wishes
to put forward proposals for an agreed on reduction of
interest on its external indebtedness, this Government
is convinced that the Council of Foreign Bondholders,
which has been representing the American holders of
German securities, would give consideration to such
proposals.
PSF: Dodd
show to F.
tile nill
ju new
-
June 28, 1934
my dear telm. Roosevelt:
Though 9 have never
had the pleasure and honor of meeting
you, I am glad learn that for are
taking a cacation in Europe and ho pe
for may be able to visit Eurnary
before you ret wm. In case you
should come this way I trust
you will let ms know a line
beforehard so That all of
may be at home, and abe
to reuden whatever assistance we can.
President Roosevelt was at me time
a
student in Sermany and This
fact, besides all the other interest.
ing circumstances, may appeal to Jrn.
) hard harthy say to you that your
son has had Uhr most difficult
tusk that ever confronted a President
and 9 think I right when )
say he has met his order with
the finest pirit possible and
has already stumm that he will
be more than successful.
Partmalis Gream into your time.
yours lincerely
Milliam E. Dodd
PSF:IIodd
Berlin, November 5,1934.
Dear Judge Moore:
We are sending with this pouch
a. special report (despatch No. 1417, October 26)
which has to do with the general military and
militaristic situation here. I thought that I
might summarize a little of my own observations
80 that you might speak to the Secretary about
it and perhaps save some of his time.
On October 26 I had a conver-
sation with Dr. Schacht. He raised the point
once more of treaty negotiations. I said to him:
you know the drift of public opinion in the
United States still runs strong; and now we
have a church issue here which is already
bringing further critical, if not hostile,
reactions at home. I might say that a number
of people, both Americans and Germans, have
expressed this view to me personally. Schacht
at once said that he realized what a great
blunder was being made in the church matter,
that he and von Neurath had on several occasions
urged upon the Chancellor a more rational policy.
He then turned to me and said: "I want to make
an appointment with the Chancellor for you to
speak with him. He is 80 completely surrounded
by Partei people that I think you ought to tell
him very frankly what outside opinion is. It
might have good effect.' I replied that I could
not intermeddle in German domestic affairs, but
Schacht showed considerable uneasiness. I men-
tion this to you because it shows BO clearly
the attitude of a great minority in Germany.
The
The Honorable
R. Walton Moore,
Assistant Secretary of State,
Washington, D.C.
- a -
The majority, however, 1s, as I judge, entirely
committed to the philosophy of complete German
unity in every direction and of war as soon 8.8
that unity is attained, war primarily against
France.
The next day my son and I drove by
way of Wittenberg, Leipzig and Nuremberg to
Constance, and on Sunday and Monday returned
through Stuttgart, Erfurt, Bitterfeld and Leip-
zig to Berlin. We observed things as closely
as we could, and had conversations at several
points. In almost every city or town there was
marching, either of Hitler Jugend or of SS and
SA men in uniform. In Bayreuth, marching and
singing kept me awake nearly all the night.
A year ago I had driven over a part
of this area, and most of the smokestacks showed
that nothing was being done. This time almost
every smokestack showed great activity, especially
in Bitterfeld, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and Erfurt.
These are not the great industrial centers, but
from everything I could learn there is great
preparation for war. Just what they manufacture
in these districts I cannot say, but the activity
seemed as great as it was in Chicago in 1928/29.
We have learned from Consular reports that in
some places they are making poison gas and explo-
sives in great quantities. The Consul in Dresden
reported November lst 1,000 airplanes in that
district.
The following conversation at Hechingen
on Sunday, October 28, illustrates what the pub-
lic thinks is going on. We had luncheon at a
hotel there, and on the wall next to my table
was a poster which I asked the hotel-keeper to
give me a copy of. You will see from this map
just what lies behind the intensive military
preparation.
- 3 -
preparation. While we were eating, at least 2,000
Hitler Jugend marched past the hotel door. They were
singing the usual songe, one of which starts
"Siegreich wollen wir Frankreich schlagen. This
song was formerly forbidden. It is now heard every-
where, at least I have reports that it is sung here
in Berlin when the troops are marching. When the hotel
man handed me the picture, I said: "Are all of you
learning to fly, as Goring suggests?" He replied:
"A very great many. We have twenty expert flyers
in this town (9,000 population), and they have reg-
istered 2,000 flyers in Stuttgart (capital, as you
know, of Wärttemberg). I said to him: "Well, that
would make a good many flyers for the whole of Ger-
many." He replied: "Yes, all the big business men
want war, and the little men are opposed. I don't
know what will happen.' This man did not know who
I was, as nobody else knew during the whole trip,
but he showed his natural reactions and was not a
little concerned. I merely mention this as illus-
trative of the feeling that is frequently reflected
in conversations but which is never indicated in
any public manner. It is fairly certain that nearly
all the population is being held under the strictest
control, and as I said above, the object is to put
France out of business.
The result of all this, if allowed tc go
through, will of course mean annexations and pre-
dominance of the whole of Europe. I am not saying
this is certain, only all the contemporary evidence
points that way. I need hardly take more of your
time.
Sincerely yours,
William E. Dodd
Enclosures.
Das Deutfche Dolk muß ein
Dolk non fliegern merden.
-
Anmeldungen und Openden nimmt die
fliegerortsgruppe Hechingen
Adolf Hitler-Plats 17
entgegen
helft der deutfchen Luftfahrt,
dann helft ihr Deutfchland!
Werdet Mitglied des Deutschen Luftsportverbandes!
PSF:Ilodd
European, (s)
Wodd (2) fill
ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
November 20, 1934.
Dear Mr. President:
You may perhaps find of some interest the
enclosures, which please do not go to the trouble
of having returned to me.
Dr. Dodd's letter presents a rather dark
picture of what is going on in Germany. His
proposed historical address points out, as he
is much in the habit of doing, what a hard task
it has been from ancient times until now to assure
the mass of the people a fair measure of the good
things of life.
In accordance with your suggestion, I have
talked at some length with Mr. Steinhardt and
shall have some further talk with Mr. Long and
am discussing with the Foreign Personnel Board
methods that may be employed for improving our
Service abroad.
With great respect and warm best wishes
for you always, I am
Yours very sincerely,
Enclosures:
Letter from Am-
bassador Dodd and
copy of speech.
The President
The White House.
[PSF, Dadit]
Enclosures to
letter to the President
from Assistant Secretary
R. Walton Moore.
Ps Fi Vodd
address befasse 1934. so bede. be D. C.1 two DR William 2.Dudd a
THE EMERGENCE OF THE FIRST SOCIAL
ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES.
was
I
27,
There have been two conscious or unconscious
social orders in the United States, where another great
crisis is now forcing men to re-examine the philosophies
of their predecessors. The first of these began with the
Stuart Restoration and ended in 1865; the second emerged
slowly between 1823 and 1861, took definite economic form
in 1865, and reached the a.cme of its power, if not its
end, in 1929. There are many serious thinkers in the
American intellectual realm today who feel that a third
social order is slowly emerging, that democracy is going
to be tried at last on a national scale. Hence it may
not be out of order to describe and assess the first
phase of the old Plantation life which began when the
Clarendon Code was applied to England, assumed a more
dogmatic and arbitrary character soon after a clever
New Englander showed the South Carolinians how to make
a thousand bales of cotton grow where one had grown
before, and came to its tragic end when Robert E. Lee
surrendered at Appomattox.
- a -
If one would understand the making of the social
and cultural life of the Old South, he must study the
troubled Europe from which our model-setting ancestors
came during the seventeenth century. There the ware
for religious liberties were paralelled by the economic
and social disasters due to the incoming shiploads of
gold and silver from Central and South America. And
while wars created artificial markets that suddenly col-
lapsed, and the discovery of vast stores of the precious
metals upset the value standards of the time, the rapid
growth of English industry and drastic changes in agri-
cultural life added to the social chaos from which hundreds
of thousands of the more ambitious unemployed of western
Europe escaped to the stormy islands of the West Indies
or the dangerous forests of North America. The common
man of the Stuart and Bourbon absolutiems was in a worse
plight in 1607 and 1660 than his successor of our day;
and it was the common man of the seventeenth century
who set the patterns of life for which most Americans
1.
and most western Europeans sadly contend today.
II,
During the first fifty years of British dis-
1. Eden, Sir Frederick: The State of the Poor, in three
volumes published in 1797, gives ample information.
- 3 -
coveries and settlements in North America, Bacon and
Coke, Hooker and Sandys, Hampden and Milton, Lilburne
and Baxter, Hobbes and Looke argued, wrote, quarrelled
and fought over every principle of religion, self-
government and personal freedom known to mankind.
Although newspapers were already in existence, forty
thousand pamphlets circulated among the English people
during the first half of the seventeenth century. Rarely
has there ever appeared in so short a period so many
men of high intellectual ability and moral integrity . -
never quite 80 many ready to die for their ideals. Even
the illiterate of the mid-seventeenth century must have
known a good deal about the everlasting problem of
equitable government.
From the turmoil of Stuart England there came
hundreds of entrepreneurs who hoped to build on the
protected peninsulars and islands of the North American
mainland ducal and manorial estates like those which
had been the models in European economic and social
life for five hundred years. When all Europe took to
smoking and chewing tobacco, when sugar came to be of
common use about 1650, the opportunities of grand-scale
- 4 -
agriculture were most appealing to the more ambitious
emigrants. However, it was not easy to persuade unem-
ployed folk more numerous in proportion and more help-
less then than now - to migrate to and become workers
on the proposed manorial estates. Storms and strange
diseases caused the death of one-fourth of all those
who ventured to cross the Atlantic in hundred to two
hundred ton ships; and more than a fourth of those
who settled in Virginia and Maryland died within two
years. Thus it was only the bravest and most self-
respecting of the unemployed who yielded to the per-
suasions of entrepreneurs and ship captains to migrate
to North America.
The terms on which the poorer freemen and
the unemployed of England agreed to cross the dangerous
Atlantic were vital elements in the makeup of the early
North American character. Most men and women who went
to the Chesapeake Bay country between 1620 and 1660
stipulated that they would take the risks and become
indentured servants for five or six years only on defi-
nite terms. And entrepreneurs who controlled vast
areas of land, like the second Lord Baltimore or the
lesser Claibornes and Willoughbys of Virginia, were
glad to meet these demands. They paid six pounds each
- 5 -
for transportation of servants to their new destinations
and signed contracts in which they promised intentured
workers, at the expiration of their terms, & traot of
land, a new suit of clothes, a heifer, two pigs, fire-
arms and the simpler farm implements. These were basic
conditions upon which the majority of white people
became citizens of the North American oolonies from
Maine to Georgia. Nor can these people be regarded as
poor ne'er-do-wells, as so many historians have seemed
1.
to think.
With these guarantees in black and white, the
would-be manor lords of Virginia and Maryland were
sure to meet with difficulties. Indentured servants
were crowded into little cabine on their masters'
estates; but with vast stretches of Indian lands not
far away, these workers were not disposed to become
submissive serfs. If treatment was rough, pressure
too great, and marriage among the servants punished
too severely, they ran away to the frontier where
they could hunt and fish for a living and buy lands
1. Clark, G.N.: The Later Stuarts, 1660-1714, p.35,
shows that in a population of 5,500,520 there were
1,400,000 with incomes of £6 to nothing a year. From
other evidence I am of the opinion that there wasnearly a
million unemployed after 1661, except in war time.
- 6 -
from the Indians for bagatelles; and such great numbers
of servants did run away that more laws were enacted
on that than any other subject during a period of thirty
years. But the laws could not be enforced effectively
where half the population sympathized with the runaways;
nor were the punishments of runaways 80 severe as the
law prescribed when vestrymen of the churches and jus-
1.
tices of the courts were often ex-servants. Thus the
plantation areas were unruly democracies.
Nor was this all. The Chesapeake Bay lands
did not produce good tobacco more than five or six
years in succession, save perhaps on limited river
fronts. Consequently, permanent attachment of less
ambitious workers to the soil was not possible. Plan-
tations were always moving and changing. The masters
of a few great estates lived in fair sized houses on
river banks during the second half of the seventeenth
century; but a far greater number of planters were
constantly migrating westward or southward. Moreover,
the downward trend of prices, except in the short
period of uncontrolled British trade, 1642-1660, made
1. Hening, William Waller: The Statutes at Large of
all the Laws of Virginia, II., especially for the
years 1660-1670.
- 7 -
the entrepreneur's and the manor lord's status quite
uncertain. The guarantee of lands and freedoms to
indentured servants defeated the formation of the
stratified social order which was thought necessary.
Although there was the appearance of religious dis-
cipline and control in Virginia, it was only an
1.
appearance. People were not compelled to attend
church. The Bishop of London might name pastors to
vacancies, but the salaries and terms of service
depended on local vestries popularly elected. Every-
body was required by church decrees to bury their
dead in consecrated ground; yet many if not most land-
owners buried deceased members of their families in
their gardens or on cherished hilltops. And, although
the Prayer Book of James II's time was supposed to
express every man's creed, quite a third of Virginia
church members were dissenters or deists at heart.
Thus prospective homesteads for all who wished them,
the right to eleot assemblies and freedom of religious
beliefs and conduct, that is, self-guided democracies,
1. Wertenbaker, Thomas J.: Patrician and Plebian in
Virginia, 1910, gives & good account of social classes
in Virginia during the 17th century.
- 8 -
defeated all efforts before 1660 to set up a landed
social order reflective of the reactionary ideals
of the well-to-do. However, when the clever Edward
Hyde and George Menck manuevered Charles II back to
his father's throne, one more grand effort was made.
III.
There has rarely been a group of leaders who
80 seriously shifted the course of modern history as
did the little clique who surrounded Charles II from
the summer of 1660 to the autumn of 1667. Only three
of them, Edward Hyde, Earl of Clarendon after the
Restoration, Ashley Cooper, Earl of Shaftesbury
after 1673, and John Lord Berkeley, brother of the
Virginia Governor, were of high aristocratio stock.
The others were self-made men who knew even better
than Clarendon and Shaftesbury the art of personal
aggrandizement: George Monok, Earl of Albemarle,
Henry Bennet, Earl of Arlington, Sir George Carteret,
one-time pirate and the "richest man in England," Sir
George Downing of Harvard College, and two merchants,
1.
Martin Noell and Thomas Povey. Nearly all of these
1. Burnet, Thomas; Bishop of Salisbury: History of His
Own Time, 1818, Vol.I, Book II, gives contemporary
appraisale of these characters. The Dictionary of
National Biography (British) gives corrective facts.
- 9 -
were members of the Privy Council and thus guided the
policy of the Crown; these controlling members of the
Council were also the masters of His Majesty's famous
Board of Trade and Plantations which worked out the
new British colonial and commercial programme; they
likewise dominated both the East India Company and
the new African Slave Trade corporation, in which
the Duke of York and the King's "devoted" sister,
the Duchess of Orleans, were heavy stockholders.
Every important political and economic interest of
Restoration England was thus under the control of
eight intimates of His Majesty who were "interlocking"
1.
directors of one political and three commercial boards.
Their purposes were clearly revealed in the
Clarendon Code of 1662-65, which decreed a complete
surrender of all dissenters to the State Church, dis-
missed at a single stroke twelve hundred olergymen,
cast such men as John Bunyan and Richard Baxter into
prison and sometimes executed groups of religious or
political opponents who refused to surrender. If
1. Andrews, Charles M.: British Committees, Commissions
and Councils of Trate and Plantations, 1622-1675, -
1908, gives valuable information on this subject.
- 10 -
church folk held private meetings, they were expelled
from the country and subject to execution if they
returned. The next items of the control programme
were included in the Navigation Acts of 1660 and 1663:
according to these, all British commerce was subjected
to the strictest regulation. No ship could sail the seas
unless two-thirds of its crew were British sailors. No
sugar or tobacco from any of the plantations might be
sold to other than English merchants, who demanded and
enjoyed a. monopoly of the home market; and His Majesty
laid taxes on these colonial imports two to four times
as high as the returns paid the original producers.
French wines and silks might not go to any American
colonists except through English hands; and no Dutch
slave ship might enter plantation harbors. No one was
allowed to take money out of England, except a few
travelers; and no colonials might buy or sell commodi-
ties to French or Spanish neighbors, who paid them in
silver or gold. In 1662 the African Slave Company began
its efforts to drive the Dutch slave traders off the
1.
West Coast of Africa. And to complete the process and
1. Beer, George Louis: The Old Colonial System, 1660-1754,
Vol. I, gives full account of laws of trade and navigation.
- 11 -
avoid domestic interference, the House of Commons,
composed of the King's friends, was to be adjourned
from session to session and no elections were to be
permitted except to fill vacancies, and these were
to be carefully managed. To defeat Dutch interference,
a pact was made with the emerging Louis XIV, kinsman
of Charles II, and treaties were negotiated with
Spain and Portugal which gave England control of the
entrance to the Mediterranean, ownership of Bombay
and free access to Latin American ports. Would the
elaborate programme succeed and all the settlements
of New England, the South, and the West Indies be
brought into complete subordination?
IV
Sir William Berkeley, most eminent of all
the plantation governors, was in London from the
early summer of 1661 till the autumn of 1662, in-
structed and highly paid by his people to resist
all commercial restraints upon the tobacco planters.
He lived with his elder brother, Lord John, and
could hardly escape the influence of another brother,
- 13 -
Lord Charles, or ignore the confidential relations
of three other kinsmen of the same name with the
Catholic
Duke of York and the aging^ Queen Mother, Henrietta
Maria. Before he departed he received a gift of
£2,000 from the King and was made one of the eight
lords proprietors of the vast territory between Vir-
ginia and Florida, the other leading proprietors
being Lord John Berkeley, Albemarle, Carteret, Clar-
endon and Shaftesbury. The domain was to be divided
into 48,000-acre tracts, each presided over by a
Landgraf of ducal rank who was to subdivide his
domain into manors of 12,000 acres each. Sir William,
who already owned tracts of land in the region, was
made temporary supervisor and authorized to appoint
a governor of the dissenter settlement soon to be
known as Albemarle. About a year after Sir William's
return, Lord John Berkeley was made joint overlord
of New Jersey, with Sir George Carteret as his part-
ner. Two years before the South Carolina settlement
was made, Thomas Lord Culpeper and two or three
other favorites of the governing clique were granted
- 13 -
the six-million-aore area between the Rappahannook
and the Potomac rivers. In 1673 Culpeper was promised
the governorship and made feudal lord of Virginia. As
the joyous Berkeley returned to his post on the James
River, Charles Calvert, eldest son of the second Lord
Baltimore and Governor of Maryland, was already trying
to cure the persistent democracy of the Maryland pali-
tinate. Thus the democratic settlements from the Hud-
son to the St. Johns rivers were to be feudalized and
fitted into the marvellous structure which Clarendon
and his fellows had organized.
But the Navigation Act policy had reduced
the price of tobacco from two-pence to a half-penny
the pound. This half-penny tobacco was matched by a
similar decline in the price of sugar all over the
West Indies, where twenty years of free trade had
given all the mainland colonists high-priced markets
for their minor products, including meats, lumber
and barrel staves. The Restoration, the repudiated
debts of the Cromwell régime and the drastic commer-
cial controls produced a terrible depression in
Relations
belongs_to