Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
702295
label
H.R. 2712 / Chinese Students (1989) [2]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
702295
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
a5ea6b6c46f8cb0e
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s): foia Number: 1998-0004-F[1]; 2016-2614-F S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: George H.W. Bush Presidential Records Collection/Office of Origin: Chief of Staff, White House Office of Series: Sununu, John, Files Subseries: Issues Files OA/ID Number: 29144 Folder ID Number: 29144-006 Folder Title: H.R. 2712/Chinese Students (1989) [2] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 15 24 7 3 Office of the Attorney General Washington, B. @2053m 7 PM 1: 06 January 16, 1990 The President The White House Washington My dear Mr. President: On November 30, 1989, you directed me to take certain actions to improve the immigration status of nationals of the People's Republic of China ("PRC") currently in the United States. You requested that I report to you on the status of these actions. This letter sets forth the actions I have taken. In each instance, the action I have taken affords relief equivalent to, or greater than, the relief that would have been provided by H.R. 2712 (the "bill"). (I have attached copies of my letter to the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") of December 1, 1989, and INS' cable to its field offices of the same date, implementing your directives). 1. You directed that I provide PRC nationals with an irrevocable waiver, that they may exercise until January 1, 1994, of the foreign residence requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(e). I have waived this requirement for all PRC aliens present in the United States as of December 1, 1989. This waiver is irrevocable. Any such alien who makes a nonfrivolous application for adjustment or any change of status may avail himself of the waiver until January 1, 1994. This action provides adjustment relief equivalent to that provided by the bill. 2. You directed that I take steps to assure the continued lawful status of PRC aliens lawfully present in the United States on June 5, 1989. I have directed that PRC aliens who were in lawful status as of June 5, 1989, be considered to have maintained lawful status for the purposes of adjustment or change of nonimmigrant status. Again, this action provides relief equivalent to that provided by the bill. 3. You directed that I provide authorization for employment of PRC nationals present in the United States on June 5, 1989. I have directed that INS grant all PRC aliens who were present in the United States as of June 5, 1989, the necessary authorization to engage in employment. This action provides employment opportunities greater than those afforded by the bill, which would have granted employment authorization only to certain PRC aliens, i.e., Chinese students in the F, J, or M visa categories. 4. You directed that I provide notice of expiration of nonimmigrant status, rather than institution of deportation proceedings, to PRC aliens who are eligible for deferral of enforced departure and whose nonimmigrant status has expired. I have directed that any PRC aliens who are eligible for deferral of enforced departure and whose authorized period of stay has expired be given notice of expiration of nonimmigrant status. This notice will be nonadversarial in nature and will explain the options available. This action provides for notification equivalent to that required by the bill. 5. Finally, you directed that I provide for enhanced consideration under the immigration laws for individuals from any country who express a fear of persecution upon return to their country related to that country's policy of forced abortion or sterilization. I have directed that, with respect to all applications for asylum, withholding of deportation, and refugee status, careful consideration be given to applicants expressing fear of persecution related to family planning policies of forced abortion or sterilization. If an applicant establishes that the applicant has refused to abort or to be sterilized, he or she will be considered to have established a well-founded fear of persecution. All other factors that may contribute to a determination of eligibility for asylum, withholding of deportation, and refugee status, will also be given additional weight. These actions provide broader relief to persons fearing coercive family planning policies than that provided by the bill, which extended only to PRC aliens. Draft regulations to implement this directive, effective upon publication, will be available within a week. In addition to these measures, INS has established an Outreach Program to assist PRC aliens in the United States. INS has held briefings and consultations with representatives of PRC student leaders, the National Association of Foreign Student Affairs, and private groups interested in the PRC, to inform them of available options. Many INS district offices have also arranged meetings with local Chinese community and educational - 2 - institutions. Each INS District Office has designated a point of contact specifically to assist PRC nationals under this program. INS field offices are also making every effort to expedite the processing of applications for benefits provided under the emergency relief measures. As of January 12, 1990, INS has granted work authorization to 2,779 PRC nationals; granted adjustment to permanent resident status for 87, with 108 cases still pending; authorized a change in temporary status for 225; and granted waivers of the foreign residence requirement of section 1182 (e). for 70. Initial results of the program indicate that these outreach efforts have been successful and that PRC aliens are aware of the available options and are filing applications. of course, I will continue to monitor developments to assure the success of your policy of providing necessary relief to PRC nationals present in the United States. Sincerely, Dick Thornburgh Attorney General - 3 - Office of the Attorney General Washington, B. C. 20530 December 1, 1989 Honorable Gene McNary Commissioner Immigration and Naturalization Service 7100 Chester Arthur Building 425 Eye Street Washington, D.C. 20536 Dear Commissioner: I am writing to you with regard to an issue of great concern to the President and this Department: the status of Chinese nationals who, as of June 5, 1989, were present in the United States ("Chinese aliens"). In order to eliminate any concern about their status and to make clear that they are entitled to remain in the United States, I am directing the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to undertake the following steps. First, I have received a favorable recommendation from the United States Information Agency that I waive the two-year foreign residency requirement found in 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (e) for Chinese aliens who, as of June 5, 1989, were present in the United States. I have determined that the admission of these aliens into the United States is in the public interest. Therefore, I hereby waive the two-year residency requirement for any such alien. These waivers are irrevocable and may be exercised until January 1, 1994 by any such alien who makes a nonfrivolous application for adjustment or any change of status. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(e). Second, I direct that Chinese aliens who were in lawful status as of June 5, 1989 shall be considered to have maintained lawful status for purposes of adjustment of status or change of nonimmigrant status. Third, INS shall grant all Chinese aliens the necessary authorization to engage in employment. Fourth, any Chinese aliens who are eligible for deferral of enforced departure and whose authorized period of stay has expired shall be given a notice of expiration of nonimmigrant status. Such notice shall be nonadversarial in nature and shall contain an explanation of the options available to such aliens pursuant to my directives and those of INS. Finally, with respect to the adjudication of all applica- tions to the Executive Branch for asylum, withholding of deportation, or refugee status, careful consideration shall now be given to such an applicant who expresses a fear of persecution upon return to their country related to that country's family planning policy of forced abortion or coerced sterilization. If the applicant establishes that such an applicant has refused to abort or be sterilized, then the applicant will now be considered to have established a well-founded fear of persecution on the basis of political opinion. 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a) (42). All other factors (such as overt political activities, membership in an ethnic or religious minority, and family background and history) which may contribute to a determination that an applicant is eligible for asylum, withholding of deportation, or refugee status, are also to be given additional weight. INS shall, in consultation with the Executive Office for Immigration Review and the Department of State, issue any necessary implementing regulations. Sincerely, Dick Thornburgh Attorney General CC: David L. Milhollan Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet (George Bush Library) Document No. Subject/Title of Document Date Restriction Class. and Type 01. Memo From Sichan Siv to Ed Rogers 1/22/89 Re: New Information for Gov. Sununu's Meeting w/Chinese American Leaders (1 pp.) Collection: Record Group: Bush Presidential Records Office: Chief of Staff, White House Office of Series: Sununu, John, Files Open on Expiration of PRA Subseries: Issues Files (Document Follows) WHORM Cat.: By JP (NLGB) on 5/12/05 File Location: H.R. 2712/Chinese Students (1989) [2] Date Closed: 12/2/2004 OA/ID Number: 29144-006 FOIA/SYS Case #: 1998-0004-F[1] Appeal Case #: Re-review Case #: 2005-0426-S Appeal Disposition: P-2/P-5 Review Case #: Disposition Date: AR Case #: MR Case #: AR Disposition: MR Disposition: AR Disposition Date: MR Disposition Date: RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] P-1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA] (b)(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P-2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA] (b)(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an P-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA] agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or (b)(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] (b)(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P-5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] (b)(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] (b)(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of (b)(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] (b)(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information PRM. Removed as a personal record misfile. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON January 22, 1989 MEMORANDUM FOR ED ROGERS FROM: SICHAN SIV SUBJECT: NEW INFORMATION FOR GOV. SUNUNU'S MEETING WITH CHINESE AMERICAN LEADERS The following information could be useful for Gov. Sununu's meeting with Chinese American leaders this afternoon. Chinese Americans are divided on Pelosi bill. The number of people who support the President has drastically increased. There has been a massive letter and phone campaign in support of the President over the weekend. These are worth mentioning: - From 100 Chinese Americans in San Francisco to the President: YOUR POLICY HAS OUR FULL SUPPORT - From the 150 year old Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association to the Washington Post: WE STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT A DEFERRAL ON THE VOTE OVERRIDE WILL PROVIDE THE NECESSARY TIME TO ARRIVE AT A SOLUTION THAT WILL SERVE OUR NATIONAL INTEREST AS WELL AS THE CHINESE STUDENTS - From Taiwan born Prof. Y. T. Lee of UC-Berkeley (1986 Nobel Prize winner) to the Washington Post: I AGREE MORE WITH BUSH ON CHINA - From three Washington-based Chinese organizations to the Washington Post: THE PRESIDENT HAS ACTED IN THE LONG TERM INTEREST OF AMERICA. WE URGE CONGRESS NOT TO OVERRIDE THE PRESIDENTIAL DECISION TO WITHHOLD APPROVAL OF HR 2712 I believe the support will continue to increase, if the President could approve the extension of work authorization beyond June 1990. The deferral of the veto override would be extremely helpful for us to get more support to sustain the veto. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON PROSPECTIVE ATTENDEES BRIEFING ON H.R. 2712 WITH CHINESE AMERICAN LEADERS JANUARY 22, 1990 -- 5 P.M. ROOM 180, OLD EXECUTIVE GRANT MOY, JR. General Counsel Government Printing Office 275-2757 ALFRED HONG (New York) Chairman; Chinese American Citizen Alliance New York State Heritage Council Chinese American Republican Club - Queens, New York Chinese American Republican Nationality Federation 718-454-1697 BARRY TIEN (New Jersey) Director New Jersey Asian American Political Coalition 718-463-0011 REV. MAN-KING TSO Baptist Church, Georgetown 333-7212 289-3611 REV. JONATHAN LIU Chinese Bible Church 460-4963 924-4855 CAROL CHEN Producer, Chinese Program Channel 26 TV (Maryland) Member, School Board, Montgomery County, Maryland 230-0674 JULIE RAO President Asian American Congressional Forum Special Assistant to the Commissioner Federal Food & Drug Administration 485-0009 I-CHUAN CHEN Director, International Relations, United Technology International Corp. 785-7403 DR. SAM LIN Deputy Assistant to the Surgeon General Department of Health and Human Services 443-6670 ED MOY Director Pre-paid Health Care Insurance Department of Health and Human Services Former member, Central Committee Wisconsin Republican Party 245-0811 DANIEL HO Chairman Department of Computer Information and Mathematics Southeastern University 488-8162 JAMES WHANG, Ph.D. President AEPCO, Inc. (Over 500 employees) 670-6770 PATRICK SUNG Attorney Mobil Oil Company Chairman, Maryland Chapter National Republican Asian Assembly 849-7730 MIMI TSE Vice President Chinese American Music Society Vice President Creative Associate International Inc. 229-2198 ROBERT KWOK, MD President Chinese American Music Society 262-0330 EUGENE Y. HSI Chairman Organization of Chinese American - Baltimore Chief Executive Officer Transviron Inc. 301-321-6961 ELEANOR WANG Member, Central Committee Baltimore Republican Committee 301-363-7558, 301-655-7373 HOMER CHEN Lt. Governor Toastmaster Club 962-1342 DR. GRACE SHU (Pennsylvania) Assistant Treasurer National Republican Heritage Council 717-322-0228 JOHN T. CHEN, Ph.D. President Chinese Cultural & Community Services Center, Inc. Senior Researcher Nuclear Regulatory Commission 492-7000 HEO-PEH LEE, Ph.D. (New York) Chairman Chinese American Political Action Association of Metropolitan New York Chairman, Board Of Director Shie-Jie Enterprise CHONG-PIN LIN, Ph.D. Associate Director China Study Program American Enterprise Institute 862-5865 ROBERT HSUEH (Texas) National Co-Chairman National Republican Asian Assembly Immigration Attorney 214-991-5367 CHI WANG, Ph.D. Professor of History Georgetown University 707-5423 IGNATIUS TSAO, Ph.D. Professor State University of New York - Oneonta (607) 431-3553 NELSON F. L. LEE Vice President Quan Gdong Benevolent Association HUN J. GOON Vice President Chew Long Association Member of the Board Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association LAWRENCE T. TOM President Chew Long Association Member of the Board Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association YEN-DEN A. CHAN Secretary Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association DR. JOHN YOUNG Professor of History Seton Hall University Secretary Chinese Language Teacher's Association VERN JARVIS Deputy Director, Public Affairs Immigration and Naturalization Service BILL COOK Immigration and Naturalization Service JIM PULEO Immigration and Naturalization Service Office of the Attorney General Washington, B. 7 74 1: 06 January 16, 1990 The President The White House Washington My dear Mr. President: On November 30, 1989, you directed me to take certain actions to improve the immigration status of nationals of the People's Republic of China ("PRC") currently in the United States. You requested that I report to you on the status of these actions. This letter sets forth the actions I have taken. In each instance, the action I have taken affords relief equivalent to, or greater than, the relief that would have been provided by H.R. 2712 (the "bill"). (I have attached copies of my letter to the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") of December 1, 1989, and INS' cable to its field offices of the same date, implementing your directives). 1. You directed that I provide PRC nationals with an irrevocable waiver, that they may exercise until January 1, 1994, of the foreign residence requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (e). I have waived this requirement for all PRC aliens present in the United States as of December 1, 1989. This waiver is irrevocable. Any such alien who makes a nonfrivolous application for adjustment or any change of status may avail himself of the waiver until January 1, 1994. This action provides adjustment relief equivalent to that provided by the bill. 2. You directed that I take steps to assure the continued lawful status of PRC aliens lawfully present in the United States on June 5, 1989. I have directed that PRC aliens who were in lawful status as of June 5, 1989, be considered to have maintained lawful status for the purposes of adjustment or change of nonimmigrant status. Again, this action provides relief equivalent to that provided by the bill. 3. You directed that I provide authorization for employment of PRC nationals present in the United States on June 5, 1989. I have directed that INS grant all PRC aliens who were present in the United States as of June 5, 1989, the necessary authorization to engage in employment. This action provides employment opportunities greater than those afforded by the bill, which would have granted employment authorization only to certain PRC aliens, i.e., Chinese students in the F, J, or M visa categories. 4. You directed that I provide notice of expiration of nonimmigrant status, rather than institution of deportation proceedings, to PRC aliens who are eligible for deferral of enforced departure and whose nonimmigrant status has expired. I have directed that any PRC aliens who are eligible for deferral of enforced departure and whose authorized period of stay has expired be given notice of expiration of nonimmigrant status. This notice will be nonadversarial in nature and will explain the options available. This action provides for notification equivalent to that required by the bill. 5. Finally, you directed that I provide for enhanced consideration under the immigration laws for individuals from any country who express a fear of persecution upon return to their country related to that country's policy of forced abortion or sterilization. I have directed that, with respect to all applications for asylum, withholding of deportation, and refugee status, careful consideration be given to applicants expressing fear of persecution related to family planning policies of forced abortion or sterilization. If an applicant establishes that the applicant has refused to abort or to be sterilized, he or she will be considered to have established a well-founded fear of persecution. All other factors that may contribute to a determination of eligibility for asylum, withholding of deportation, and refugee status, will also be given additional weight. These actions provide broader relief to persons fearing coercive family planning policies than that provided by the bill, which extended only to PRC aliens. Draft regulations to implement this directive, effective upon publication, will be available within a week. In addition to these measures, INS has established an Outreach Program to assist PRC aliens in the United States. INS has held briefings and consultations with representatives of PRC student leaders, the National Association of Foreign Student Affairs, and private groups interested in the PRC, to inform them of available options. Many INS district offices have also arranged meetings with local Chinese community and educational - 2 - institutions. Each INS District Office has designated a point of contact specifically to assist PRC nationals under this program. INS field offices are also making every effort to expedite the processing of applications for benefits provided under the emergency relief measures. As of January 12, 1990, INS has granted work authorization to 2,779 PRC nationals; granted adjustment to permanent resident status for 87, with 108 cases still pending; authorized a change in temporary status for 225; and granted waivers of the foreign residence requirement of section 1182 (e) for 70. Initial results of the program indicate that these outreach efforts have been successful and that PRC aliens are aware of the available options and are filing applications. of course, I will continue to monitor developments to assure the success of your policy of providing necessary relief to PRC nationals present in the United States. Sincerely Dick Thornburgh Attorney General - 3 - Office of the Attorney General Bashington, B. C. 20530 December 1, 1989 Honorable Gene McNary Commissioner Immigration and Naturalization Service 7100 Chester Arthur Building 425 Eye Street Washington, D.C. 20536 Dear Commissioner: I am writing to you with regard to an issue of great concern to the President and this Department: the status of Chinese nationals who, as of June 5, 1989, were present in the United States ("Chinese aliens"). In order to eliminate any concern about their status and to make clear that they are entitled to remain in the United States, I am directing the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to undertake the following steps. First, I have received a favorable recommendation from the United States Information Agency that I waive the two-year foreign residency requirement found in 8 U.S.C. § 1182 1182(e) (e) for Chinese aliens who, as of June 5, 1989, were present in the United States. I have determined that the admission of these aliens into the United States is in the public interest. Therefore, I hereby waive the two-year residency requirement for any such alien. These waivers are irrevocable and may be exercised until January 1, 1994 by any such alien who makes a nonfrivolous application for adjustment or any change of status. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(e). Second, I direct that Chinese aliens who were in lawful status as of June 5, 1989 shall be considered to have maintained lawful status for purposes of adjustment of status or change of nonimmigrant status. Third, INS shall grant all Chinese aliens the necessary authorization to engage in employment. Fourth, any Chinese aliens who are eligible for deferral of enforced departure and whose authorized period of stay has expired shall be given a notice of expiration of nonimmigrant status. Such notice shall be nonadversarial in nature and shall contain an explanation of the options available to such aliens pursuant to my directives and those of INS. Finally, with respect to the adjudication of all applica- tions to the Executive Branch for asylum, withholding of deportation, or refugee status, careful consideration shall now be given to such an applicant who expresses a fear of persecution upon return to their country related to that country's family planning policy of forced abortion or coerced sterilization. If the applicant establishes that such an applicant has refused to abort or be sterilized, then the applicant will now be considered to have established a well-founded fear of persecution on the basis of political opinion. 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a) (42). All other factors (such as overt political activities, membership in an ethnic or religious minority, and family background and history) which may contribute to a determination that an applicant is eligible for asylum, withholding of deportation, or refugee status, are also to be given additional weight. INS shall, in consultation with the Executive Office for Immigration Review and the Department of State, issue any necessary implementing regulations. Sincerely, Dick Thornburgh Attorney General cc: David L. Milhollan STATES PUBLIC DIPLOMACY IN CHINA A report OF the UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION on public DIPLOMACY THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release November 30, 1989 STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT On the 6th of June, following the tragic events in China, I took action to guard against the chance that any Chinese student would be forcibly returned to face possible persecution. Today I re-emphasize my commitment -- as I have told Chinese students in America, and as I have told Congress -- to never allow any action that would force the return of Chinese students if their lives or liberty are at risk. Because of this firm commitment, I am supportive of the humanitarian principles underlying H.R. 2712. For these same humanitarian reasons, I have today taken administrative action that will offer the same protections as those provided for in H.R. 2712. I have instructed the Attorney General to take the steps necessary to extend administratively to all Chinese students in the United States the same benefits that H.R. 2712 would have extended. In addition, I have exercised my authority to provide opportunity for employment to a wider class of Chinese aliens than the bill would have required. And -- going further than the bill's provisions concerning asylum cases arising in connection with China's family policies -- I have also instructed the Attorney General to ensure that this provision is implemented administratively and in such a way as to offer this protection to all foreign nationals, regardless of their country of origin. Because these administrative steps make it unnecessary, I have at the same time disapproved H.R. 2712. My Administration has opposed Congressional micromanagement of foreign policy. Such legislation puts America in a straightjacket and can render us incapable of responding to changing circumstances. H.R. 2712 is inconsistent with this policy. The Chinese students should know that this is not a temporary action. America will always stand with them, and with freedom-loving adhere men and women around the world. I will always # # # Extended Page 1.1 B6 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 29. 1989 DAVID LAVENTHOL, Publisher and Chief Executive Officer RICHARD T. SCHLOSBERG ПІ, President and Chief Operating Officer SHELBY COFFEY III, Editor and Executive Vice President DONALD H. CLARK, Executive Vice President, Marketing Nos Angeles Times JAMES D. BOSWELL, Vice President, Employee and Public Relations A Times Mirrer Newspaper JEFFREY S. HALL, Vice President Publishers LAWRENCE M. HIGBY, Vice President HARRISON GRAY OTIS, 1882-1917 WILLIAM A. NIRSE, Vice President and General Counsel HARRY CHANDLER, 1917-1944 NORMAN CHANDLER, 1944-1960 GEORGE COTLIAR, Managing Editor OTIS CHANDLER, 1960-1980 ToM JOHNSON, 1980-1989 THOMAS PLATE, Editor of the Editorial Pages Chairman, 1989 FRANK DEL OLMO, Deputy Editor of the Editorial Pages A Matter ofHonor If President George Bush vetoes a measure that spokesmen also argue that if they are compelled to would halt the forced repatriation of more than go home, those among the Chinese students who 30,000 Chinese students now living in the United survive and prosper will constitute a future bloc of States, his Administration doubtless will defend his pro-American sentiment. Such calculation may be action as realistic. In fact, it will be dishonorable. characterized by some as Realpolitik; others with a It also will be pointless, since both the House and clearer eye will see it as moral squalor. Senate passed the bill by margins more than In the Middle Ages, Europe's churches were sufficient to override a presidential veto. While the places of inviolable sanctuary for the persecuted. Administration seems to believe that it can deny As the cathedral of democracy, the United States the implications of last June's massacre of peaceful has provided similar refuge for those courageous pro-democracy demonstrators in Tian An Men enough to act in defense of human rights. Over the Square and put Sino-American relations back on a past two centuries, this Republic has sheltered business-as-usual footing, Congress harbors no Poles victimized by czarist usurpation and Irish such delusions. Fenians struggling under the yoke of British Speaking on the House floor last week, Demo- imperialism, visionary Zionists and Hungarian crat Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco, author of the freedom-fighters, early Korean opponents of Japa- bill to allow the Chinese students to remain here nese militarism and the first champions of Czecho- after their visas expire in June, was clear on the slovak freedom. fate that awaits them if they are forced to return Now, Congress wishes to extend the American home: "We can be certain," she said, "that most of people's protective hand of friendship to young these students will be subject to repression." people who have risked their very lives in the In the Administration's view, this chilling fact cause of Chinese freedom. If the Bush Administra- must be discounted in the interest of maintaining tion puts its power in the way of that altogether open Sino-American relations. Privately, its decent gesture, it will incur lasting shame. 11. 30. 88 11:44AM %ARENT FOX P O 2 Burlington Free Press November 30, 1989 wy steprather, raped and otherw increasing the income tax rate. molested the little girl. Stephar was not only aware of what he pened, she encouraged her o Help Chinese students daughter to cooperate. Because her husband was the Army and the crime occurr P resident George Bush appears ready to abandon American in military housing, both we support for basic human rights in exchange for improving tried in federal district court U.S. relations with the tyrants in Beijing who massacred Kentucky. their own people just six months ago in Tiananmen Square. The husband pleaded guil White House spokesmen have said Bush may veto B bill that and was sentenced to 20 years swould provide four-year visa extensions for Chinese students in the prison. United States. The measure, which passed the House unanimously Stephanie was found guilty and the Senate on a voice vote, also waives a requirement that the aiding and abetting her husba students return home before getting new visas, and received an eight-year Be A visit to China could mean imprisonment or execution for tence. students who spoke out in support of pro-democracy demonstrations The child, of course, was tak For most, returning home will likely mean permanently losing their from her and placed with fost freedom to live and study outside China. parents. The White House claims that a visa clemency program Bush But the story doesn't end ther offered provides all the opportunity the students need to wait out After serving about thr the crackdown in China. But that program ends in June 1990. Few years of her sentence, Siephan students have applied for the waiver, no doubt not wanting to risk was paroled. But her legal difi repercussions from their government for delaying their scheduled culties didn't end with her parole return dates. Stephanie is not a citizen this country. She is German. SI The United States can do little to help Chinese who live under met the degenerate while he W the rule of Beijing's dictators. But we can, and must, help people stationed in Germany. They me who are visiting America and are afraid to go home. Their lives, ried and she and her daughte and American commitment to human rights in all countries, is far came here with him. more vital to U.S. interests than rebuilding relations with a regime Because she isn't a citizen, at that murders its people. could be deported. The immigr tion laws say that If an alien Forum convicted of R crime involvin "moral turpitude" within fiv years of coming bere, the alle Bus stop action more in-depth coverage of labor can get the boot. issues throughout the city, state There has been a reference in Bo the immigration authoritie and country and to work quickly decided that there was somethin your paper to the unsafe bus stop towards a contract resolution with at Surie Wilson Road. reprebensible about allowing one its own employees. The public can be assured that LEN SCHMIDT COTA has taken immediate action Starksboro to (change the location of its bus Insurance stop. As a temporary measure, Yankee support patrons who used to board or That the Salvadoran army WASHINGTON - Consume disembark at Suste Wilson Road killed six American priests is not will be required to walk to the bus advocates are taking scissors 1 too surprising. After all it was stop at the east entrance of Fort only a few years ago that they the vell of mystery and complex Ethan Allen. The town of Essex raped and killed four American ty that shrouds the insurance 1 will maintain 8 walkway from the nuns, and only a while before that dustry, and the industry is in but stop to Susle Wilson Road and they assassinated their own arch- panic, keep It clear in the winter. The bishop. Five decades ago they That panic surfaced at a E bus will not stop at Susie Wilson massacred 25,000 Indians that cest Insurance convention the Road. they lured into & city square. And A permanent solution is being turned into a vicious pro-Industr betwixt and between they have assessed with the town of Essex. rally when John Crosby, vice pre murdored countless of their own Alternatives will be evaluated to ident of the National Associatic civilians. see how we can provide better They are now what they al- of Independent Insurers, took th service that will be safe and ac- ways have been, ruthless fasciats podium. In a carefully crafte commindating. The change will be who enjoy nothing better than analogy, he suggested that propa built Into our schedule at a future butchering helpless people. It is ganda espoused by consume date and the public will be noti- obvious that they are also cow- groups "parallels Hitler" and the fied. ards and have no soldier's valor deception of the Third Reich. The safety of our patrons is or stomach for fighting, or they Important to us. We hope that the Crosby jumped on the consun would have dislodged the rebels sedurity of the new stop will be or advocates who criticize th from their capitol. worth the inconvenience of walk- What is surprising and disgust- insurance industry for taking bi ing to the shopping centers in that ing is that we continue to arm and profits. "Ralph Nader wants or visinity. teals Persian ruge off our floors, h 11. 30. 89 10:4SAM *ARENT FOX P 0 2 WILLIAM LOES, President and Publisher, 1946-1981 NACKEY 5. LOSS, President and Publisher Where the Spirit of the Lord Is, There Is Liberty II CORINTHIANS 3:17 "There is nothing so powerful as truth" DANIEL WEBSTER Sign It, Mr. President! Perhaps there was more than Students Association at Harvard meets the eye to President George University, Zhexi Lro, pointed out in Bush's seemingly inexplicable reti- at letter sent Tuesday to The Union cence dramatically to proclaim East Leader: Germany's momentous opening of the What is at stake is the very Berlin Wall as a victory for freedom survival of the Chinese student and decades-old U.S. policy. Perhaps pro democracy movement in the U.S. the President's reluctance involved The Chinese government has more than his personal style, more silenced the voice of democracy in than his proclaimed desire not to Tinanmen Square by violence. Now it appear to be gloating as the Malta attempts to silence the voice of conference with Soviet leader Mik- democracy for China in the U.S. by hail Gorbachev approached. Intimidation." Perhaps, just perhaps, Bush Will the President himself be sensed that it would be poor form to Intimidated? It would appear that he already has been. While he has acted, through his administration's Extend- ed Deferred Departure Program, to assure the Chinese students that they won't be deported until next June 5th. he knows full well - or has every reason to know - that few Chinese students have been naive enough to apply for EDD's "protection." In the words of the student leaders of IFCSS "Once a student enters the pro- gram, there is no way out and they will be deported to China in June PRESIDENT BUSH 1990. Students entering the EDD be perceived as extolling the extraor- program offend the Chinese govern- dinary flowering of democracy and ment and they will be marked as freedom in Eastern Europe even as he traitors; for these reasons, students was preparing to slam the door of will not apply. Many would rather go freedom in the face of 40,000 Chinese underground than face the conse- students studying In the United quences of political persecution upon States -slam it. that is, for fear of their return to China. This is not a uffending the Butchers of Tiananmen bill of immigration, but a bill of Square. human rights. 11. 30. 89 10 46AM *ARENT FOX SO 07 10.30 UNION LEHDER NEWSROOM 6035680386 F.99 p.2 Even Yas the encouraging news And who opposes this bill? Cer- came in from Berlin. administration tainly not Congress. Certainly not the representatives were passing the people of the United States. No. H.R. word that the President was prepar- 2712 is opposed by the State Depart- ing to veto (or pocket veto) the ment, which fears that its enactment Emergency Chinese Immigration Re- would hamper offorts to restore llef Act of 1989, which would waive Sino-American relations to their the requirement that Chinese stu- pre-June levels and. of immediate dents and scholars here on visas must concern, anticipates that the Chinese return to their home country for a government would react to the Presi- minimum of two years. And now that dent's signature by suspending edu- both houses of Congress have passed cational exchange programs! the measure without a single dissent- Well, Beijing's attitude toward ing vote, passed it with bipartisan and Sino-American relations can be seen liberal and conservative support that in its suspension last June of the ranged from Massachusetts' Senator Fulbright program under which Edward Kennedy to New Hamp- American scholars study in China and shire's Senator Gordon Humphrey, by its move to reduce to a trickle the the moment of Presidential decision number of Chinese scholars who have is at hand. been able to leave China under the WIII Bush consign these students, Exchange Visitor Program. More- united under the umbrella of the over, warned 28 U.S. senators (not Independent Federation of Chinese Including New Hampshire's Warren Students and Scholars, officially de- Rudman) in a November 22nd letter wignated a "counterrevolutionary" or- to the President: ganization by the Chinese govern- It is clear that the Chinese ment. to a future that is at best government will send here only the uncertain, at worst life-threatening, most ideologically tested and rell or will he resist efforts of Chinese able' students for the oreseable diplomats to intimidate them here in future, and, should Beijing decide in this land of the free by signing H.R. the future to restore the ulbright 2712 into law? (See also Cal Thomas' program, there is no doubt that our timely column elsewhere on this scholars would be subjected to far page. -Editors) greater scrutiny than they were before The President knows that these the Tianaumen massucre." students are "criminals" in the eyes of Will the President stand with the the Beijing regime. He knows that students who played such a vital role Xiang Cunyl, vice chairman of the in the pro-democracy movement in Judiciary Committee of the National China? Or will he aid and abet the People's Congress of China, only campaign of intimidation that Chil recently announced that Chinese nese authorities have waged against citizens who committed "counterreu- them by vetoing (or pocket vetoing) olutionary crinte" in foreign countries this bill? will be punished when, their visas We anticipate the latter. We pray expired, they return to China. we are wrong. As the chairman of the Chinese Jim Finnegan p.3 Page Classified 1 AUTOMOTIVE EMPLOYMENT INSTRUCTIONS PERSONALS Playing Checkers With Chinese Students' Lives By CAL THOMAS In a letter to President Bush, a drove them to such visible opposition to F PRESIDENT BUSH fails to. confition of libera' and conservativo. the Communist regime in Beijing. Now sign the Emergency Chinese senators, including Kennedy and Wil- they feel threatened by the very Immigration Relief Act by Dec. liam Armstrong (H-Colo.), wrote: "Our country which serves as their model for 2. as many as 32,000 of the 40,000 first priority must be to stand with the freedom. Chinese students in the United students who are here and have played Lianchao tells me, "We have no plans States may be forced to return home such a significant role in the pro-demoe- to stay here forever only until things beginning next June. There. they could racy movement in China." get better in China. We want to go back face punishment for their support of the Recently I had dinner with some eventually." pro democracy movement that erupted Chinese students who attend the Uni- Zhang Yiquan, a 32-year-old physics versity of Maryland One, who asked student, who is married and has a last spring. Some administration officials oppose that his name not be used, told me, "If I darighter, thinks China will open up am foreed to go back, ] could be sent to a eventually. "In June, I thought il the bill because labor camp and required to make shouldn't be longer than two years, he they say it would prevent other Chi- confessions. My impression is that they says. "Now 1 think it will be no longer nese students from know exactly what I have been doing than 10 years." here. One erabassy official told me of As Sen. Kennedy nated during the coming here. But debate on the bill, "These students and this is preposter- some very private details involving my Tamily at home, including arguments scholars are living representatives of ous. China suspend- al its participation family members had concerning wheth- the dream for democracy in China. Bol this dream could be dashed in an in the Fulbright er I should marry my wife. I look part in the pro democracy demonstrations in instant if they are required to return scholarship pro- gram in June, and Washington. I saw them taking my against their will. At best, they may join those Chinese democratic leaders who the number of Chi- picture." are in the human rights underground. nese scholars allowed to leave the Thirty-three-year-old Lianchao Han At worst, they could well join their country under the Exchange Visitor of Beijing is a law student. "When I was Tianammen colleagues in artyrdom." Program has slowed to a trickle. And, as at Yale Law School I was contacted by The. United States is protecting Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) ar- an official from the. Chinese Embassy astrophysicist Fang 1.i Zhi and his S gued during the floor debate, "only the who came to New Haven and asked for family in the American Embassy in most ideologically tested and 'reliable' my passport; which I gave to him," be Beijing President Bush has told me students" will be allowed out for the said. Lianchao helped build the Ameri- they can stay as long as there is a threat foreseeable Inture anyway 0 can replica of the Goddess of Democrá to their safety. If we canoffer safe haven Many of these Chinese students in cy statue" erected: last spring in to one family in Beljing, we ought to America are converts to democracy Tiananmen Square. He wears"a sweat grant similar protéction to 32,000 from doctrinaire communism. IS they shirt with the words, "We have a dream, students already in America. If we do admire the ideals of demacracy, why Freedom, Democracy, China, China, not, then these students, and their 00 should our democratic government put China" friends and relatives at home, have a them back in the clotches of a system The students told me they were right to conclude that democracy is a that would embrace them like Venus! convinced they would return to a free, sham and that those who died in flytraps? or at least freez, China, and that is what Tiananmen Square were fools. MANCHESTER RAILROADED A4 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1989 ra 50 DAILY@NEWS 220 E. 42d St. New York, N.Y. 10017 JAMES HOGE, Publisher and President JAMES P: WILLSE, Editor MICHAEL PAKENHAM, Editorial Rage Editor Don't betray the Chinese students L YING UNSIGNED ON PRESIDENT BUSH'S desk is a bill that could save hundreds, perhaps thousands, of lives and yield a major contribution to America's pool of brainpower. It passed the House by a vote of 403 to 0 with the Senate going along by voice vote. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the measure - U.S. terms: But the Communist warlords.of Beijing don'tlike it, Not a bit. And there is talk that Bush may give in to their pressure and veto. That would be tragic. The bill would affect the 40,000 Chinese citizens who are in the U.S. today by virtue of student visas. Such visas are issued for fixed periods of time: Under existing law, when one expires the person holding it must go home for at least two years before applying for another U.S. visa, student or otherwise. That makes a good deal of sense for the U.S. and for students' home countries. Under normal circumstances. These are not normal circumstances for Chinese students. The bloodbath at Tiananmen Square on June 4 made that very clear. The Chinese government's position is that dissent- ing students deserve to be shot, imprisoned indefinitely or ex- iled to labor camps - without due process or hope. The whole world saw that played out, and heard wonderful stories of cour- age and horrible ones of repression - a lot of that through con- tacts made by the students this legislation seeks to protect. It would simply give the Chinese students four years more to live in the U.S., at which time they could apply for additional visas without returning to China. The majority of them are studying scientific or technical subjects. Those are skills and knowledge that are in very short supply in U.S. industry, educa- tion and government. The majority of the students would be very high risks in today's police state in China. Why would Bush veto such a bill? Simply because the Chi- nese are demanding that he do so - and threatening to chill other relations with the U.S. if he fails them. To give in to such blackmail would be pitiful. To allow Ameri- can due process to force thousands of Chinese back to a terrify- ing fate would be outrageous. The bill must become law. New York Post THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 30 1989 Don't force students back to China On Tuesday, a delegation of Chinese a government that has just massacred students studying in America pre- thousands of its best and brightest sented the White House with an urgent young people students whose only request. They asked President Bush to "crime" was peaceful protest aimed at sign a bill which both houses of Con- democratization? gress passed last week by overwhelm- Chinese embassy officials in this margins country have reportedly been harass- The bill would allow the 40,000 Chi- ing Chinese students active in the nese students currently in the United democracy movement - threatening States to extend their student visas - reprisals against them and their fami- SO that they won't be be forced to return lies, If the Bush administration de to China when the visas expire. In light prives these students of legal grounds of the massacre at Tiananmen Square to remain here, it will implicitly assist last spring, and the ongoing repression the Chinese government in this policy in China, the bill makes a great deal of of intimidation. sense. Indeed, America's strategic interests Unfortunately, President Bush is require us to take a long view: China's threatening either to veto the measure future probably lies with those univer- outright, or tolignore it, thus killing it sity students - in China, here and else- by pocket veto. where - who yearn to oust the Marxist Apparently, the State Department is gerontocracy in Beijing In the long recommending such a course, claiming run, fruitful ties between China and the that the legislation will offend the Chi- United States rest on our relationship nese government, and put further ex- with the students. Cultivating an ami- change programs at risk: cable relationship with the aging ideo- Beijing, having crushed the student logues who are now forcing students opposition movement inside China, is throughout China to undergo Orwellian doubtless eager to get its hands on stu- 're-education" programs is both un- dents who are keeping the flame alive seemly and - in terms of long-term in the United States. For China's cur- American interests - unwise. rent rulers, the students are both valu- Finally, it is clear that most of the able intellectual capital and - SO long Chinese students now in the United as they are free - a political threat. States are a highly talented and moti- On humanitarian grounds alone, it vated group - many have advanced would be wrong for the President to training in science and engineering. If veto this legislation - the fate of the worst comes to worst in China and the students compelled to return may well repression continues, many of these be grim. Our failure to afford them ref- students could and would - as immi- age would amount to delivering them grants - make a valuable contribution into the hands of regime inclined to to American life, just as have hundreds do them harm. of thousands of refugees from oppres Moreover, what strategic interests sion throughout American history. call on America to endeavor to appease We urge the President to sign the bill THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON November 30, 1989 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY As you know, I wish to improve the immigration status of nationals of the People's Republic of China currently in the United States. At my direction, a number of measures already have been taken to accomplish this. I now direct you to take further action, pursuant to your authorities under law, including the Immigration and Nationality Act, to provide, to persons covered by the Attorney General's June 6th order deferring the enforced departure for nationals of China: 1. irrevocable waiver of the 2-year home country residence requirement which may be exercised until January 1, 1994; 2. assurance of continued lawful immigration status for individuals who were lawfully in the United States on June 5, 1989; 3. authorization for employment of Chinese nationals present in the United States on June 5, 1989; and 4. notice of expiration of nonimmigrant status, rather than institution of deportation proceedings, for individuals eligible for deferral of enforced departure whose nonimmigrant status has expired. In addition, I direct that you provide for enhanced consideration under the immigration laws for individuals from any country who express a fear of persecution upon return to their country related to that country's family planning policy of forced abortion or coerced sterilization. 2 These further actions will provide effectively the same protection for nationals of China as would H.R. 2712 as presented to me on November 21, 1989. These measures should be taken today, November 30, 1989. I request that you report to me on the status of your actions under this memorandum within 45 days. 11. 30. 89 11:44AM *ARENT FOX P 0 3 The News and Courier ARTHUR M. WILCOX. Editor Founded Jan. 10, 1803 MICHAEL J. BONAFIELD, Associate Editor ROBERT J. cox. Assistant Editor CHARLESTON, S.C. THURSDAY. NOVEMBER 30, 1989 PAGE 14-A When Peking demands, say no resident Bush has to be a contortionist students currently studying in the United P in his policy on China - maintaining States would find themselves in jail, possibly close ties with Peking while admon- facing execution or, at the very least, "re- ishing the communist gerontocracy for its education" if they were forced to return to murderous suppression of democracy. China, as Peking wishes. The line between a normal diplomatic re- It is suspicious that the Peking regime is lationship and the limits and conditions that demanding that the president veto the act. Washington has been insisting upon in its And that is one very good reason for Mr. Bush dealings with Peking is easily blurred. Rich- to refuse to give in to such a demand, and ard Nixon achieved exactly the right balance ignore those diplomats in the State Depart- during his recent visit to China. He didn't ment who appear to be suffering from that mince words in letting his old friends know professional disease known as "elientitis." that they will not be allowed to get away with Those afflicted with it tend to put the inter- the massacre of students that ended the Pe- ests of the country to which they are assigned king Spring in a welter of bloodshed. But he ahead of those of the United States. made it equally clear that the United States President Bush should either sign the values its relationship with China. Henry Kis- Emergency Chinese Immigration Relief Act singer, however, failed to impress upon the without delay or make it clear that the Unit- Sumn Chinese leadership the importance that the ed States will remain a haven for those stu- American people - and, to a lesser extent, dents whose lives would be in danger if they the U.S. government - places on the basic were forced to return. To please the diplo- Gorba rights of every individual to express himself mats who want to make their clients happy, freely and go about his lawful business with- he should suggest an easy and painless way By George F. W out official interference. for the old men of Peking to solve the prob- WASHINGTON - It is in the blurred area between the State lem. All they need do is heed the students, believes that he at Department's wish to improve relations with who were speaking for the people of China, bachev have a Peking and the American's people's desire to and give democracy a chance. The reforms ground rule: No su Gorbachev might see rule of law and, eventually, democracy in sought by the pro-democracy movement a gigantic diplore China, that several thousand Chinese stu- would benefit the Chinese people - at the cause of his envelo| dents who are studying in the United States relatively minor cost of causing the genon- sis, which is the are caught. The Chinese authorities are de- tology some slight discomfort. President exhaustion of human socialism. manding that President Bush veto an act of Bush could sugar the pill when he spurns the A Warsaw joke: Congress that would have allowed the stu- Chinese government's demand that the sto- lutions to Poland's dents to stay in this country until such time dents be sent home, by telling Deng Xiaoping one rational. the < as it is safe for them to return. It is estimated and company that the future these days isn't The rational one I that as many as 32,000 of the 40,000 Chinese red. The future is democracy. Crestochowa appel lion. The miraculo Poles become indu An unethical business The damage soci social vigor is just understood. Bush what Gorbachey T he conviction of a man for knowingly deficiency virus in the man's blood was de- Perestroika will fa selling his tainted blood to a plasma tected. and the plasma destroyed. he did not society the with in North Charleston raises a expose anyone else the the risk of contacting modernization. So subs 4th Replacement for Paragraph on Page 2 I have under current law sufficient authority to provide the necessary relief for Chinese students and others who fear returning to China in the near future. I will continue to exercise this authority vigorously, and the protection accorded under this authority will not be revocable. Manchester NH WILLIAM LOES, President and Publisher, 1946-1981 NACKEY S. LOSS, President and Publisher Union Leader Where the Spirit of the Lord Is, There Is Liberty ILCORINTRIANS 11/30/89 'There is nothing so powerful as truth" DANIEL WEBSTER Sign It, Mr. President! Perhaps there was more than Students Association at Harvard meets the eye to President George University, Zhexi Lin, pointed out In Bush's seemingly inexplicable reti- a letter sent Tuesday to The Union cence dramatically to proclaim East Leader: Cermany's momentous opening of the "What is at stake is the very Berlin Wall as a victory for freedom survival of the Chinese student and decades-old U.S. policy. Perhaps pro-democracy movement in the U.S. the President's reluctance Involved The Chinese government has more than his personal style, more silenced the voice of democracy in than his proclaimed desire not to Tinanmen Square by violence. Now It appear to be gloating as the Malta attempts to silence the voice of conference with Soviet leader Mik- democracy for China in the U.S. by hail Gorbachev approached. intimidation." Perhaps, just perhaps, Bush Will the President himself be sensed that It would be poor form to Intimidated? It would appear that he already has been. While be has acted, through his administration's Extend- ed Deferred Departure Program, to assure the Chinese students that they won't be deported until next June 5th, he knows full well - or has every reason to know - that few Chinese students have been naive enough to apply for EDD's "protection." In the words. of the student leaders of IFCSS: Once a student enters the pro- gram, there is no way out and they will be deported to China in June PRESIDENT BUSH 1990. Students entering the EDD be perceived as extolling the extraor- program offend the Chinese govern- dinary flowering of democracy and ment and they will be marked as freedom in Eastern Europe even as he traitors; for these reasons, students was preparing to stant the door of will not apply. Many would rather go freedom in the face of 40,000 Chinese underground than face the conse- students studying in the United quences of political persecution upon States -slam It. that is, for fear of their return to China This is not a offending the Butchers of Tlananmen bill of immigration. but n bill of Square. human rights. contenues on p. 2 11. 30 89 09:58AM *ARENT FOX P.94 so = 10.50 UNION LEADER NEWSROOM Replacement for Paragraph on Page 2 I have under current law sufficient authority to provide the necessary relief for Chinese students and others who fear returning to China in the near future. I will continue to exercise this authority vigorously, and the protection accorded under this authority will not be revocable. there LIST OF PARTICIPANTS FOR THE MEETING WITH CHINESE STUDENT LEADERS November 30, 1989 Liu, Yong Chuan (Mr.) Previously studied at Beijing University. Presently enrolled at Stanford University, pursuing a Ph.D. in Sociology. Mr. Liu is the President of the Independent Federation of Chinese Students and Scholars in the United States (IFCSS). The IFCSS was founded in Chicago in July 1989. About 500 Chinese students and scholars from 202 U.S. Universities were present at their first Congress Han, Lian Chao (Mr.) Previously studied at the Foreign Affairs College of Beijing. Has completed a Master of Law at Yale University. Zhao, Haiqing (Dr.) Previously studied at Beijing University. Presently enrolled at Harvard University, pursuing a Post Doctorate degree in Biochemistry. Huang, Yuangeng (Mr.) Previously studied at Transportation University in Shanghai. Presently enrolled at the University of Maryland, pursuing a Ph.D. in Computer Science. Wides, Burton Lawyer for the Chinese students. Presently affiliated with the Washington, D.C., law firm of Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin & Kahn. u/30 - 10:00 MEMORANDUM OF DISAPPROVAL In light of the all-encompassing action I have taken today, I am withholding my approval of H.R. 2712, the "Emergency Chinese Immigration Relief Act of 1989." My action today makes H.R. 2712 wholly unnecessary. I share the objectives of the overwhelming majority in Congress who passed this legislation. Within hours of the events of Tiananmen Square in June, I ordered the Attorney General to ensure that no nationals from the People's Republic of China be deported against their will, and no such nationals have been deported. Since June, my Administration has taken numerous additional and substantive actions to further guarantee this objective. Today I am extending and broadening these measures to provide additional protections. I am directing the Attorney General, the Secretary of State, and the Director of the United States Information Agency to provide additional protections to persons covered by the Attorney General's June 6th order deferring the enforced departure for nationals of China. These protections will include: (1) waiver of the two-year home country residence requirement; (2) assurance of continued lawful immigration status for individuals who were lawfully in the United States on June 5, 1989; (3) authorization for employment of such persons; and (4) notice of expiration of nonimmigrant status, rather than institution of deportation proceedings, for individuals eligible for deferral of enforced departure whose nonimmigrant status has expired. In addition, I have directed that enhanced consideration be provided under the immigration laws for individuals who express a from any country fear of persecution upon return to their country related to that country's family planning policy of forced abortion or coerced sterilization. These further actions will provide effectively the same protection for nationals of China as would H.R. 2712 as presented to me on November 21, 1989. My action today provides complete assurance that the United States will provide to Chinese nationals here the protection they deserve. It has always been my view, and it is my policy as President, that the United States shall not return any person to a country where he or she faces persecution. I have under current law sufficient authority to provide the necessary relief for Chinese students and others who fear returning to China in the near future. I will continue to exercise vigorously this authority. Maintaining flexibility in administering our productive student and scholar exchange program with China is important. As many as 80,000 Chinese have studied and conducted research in the United States since these exchanges began. I want to see these exchanges continue because it is in the national interest of the United States to promote the exchange of technical skills and democratic ideals between Chinese and Americans. It is my hope that by acting administratively, we will help foster the continuation of these programs. My actions today accomplish the laudable objectives of Congress in passing H.R. 2712 while preserving my ability to manage foreign relations. I believe that China will return to the policy of greater freedom pursued before June 3rd. I further believe that the Chinese visitors would wish to return to China in those circumstances. It would be the goal of my Administration to ensure that the knowledge and experience gained by the Chinese visitors temporarily in our country be applied to help create a freer and more prosperous China. The adjournment of Congress has prevented my return of H.R. 2712 within the meaning of Article I, section 7, clause 2 of the Constitution. Accordingly, my withholding of approval from the bill precludes its becoming law. The Pocket Veto Case, 279 U.S. 655 (1929). Because of the questions raised in opinions issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, I am sending H.R. 2712 with my objections to the Clerk of the House. MEMORANDUM OF DISAPPROVAL In light of the all-encompassing actions I have taken in June and again today, I am withholding my approval of H.R. 2712, the "Emergency Chinese Immigration Relief Act of 1989. " These actions make H.R. 2712 wholly unnecessary. I share the objectives of the overwhelming majority in the Congress who passed this legislation. Within hours of the events of Tiananmen Square in June, I ordered the Attorney General to ensure that no nationals from the People's Republic of China be deported against their will, and no such nationals have been deported. Since June, my Administration has taken numerous additional and substantive actions to further guarantee this objective. Today I am extending and broadening these measures to provide the same protections as H.R. 2712. I am directing the Attorney General, the Secretary of State, and the Director of the United States Information Agency to provide additional protections to persons covered by the Attorney General's June 6th order deferring the enforced departure for nationals of China. These protections will include: (1) irrevocable waiver of the 2-year home country residence requirement which may be exercised until January 1, 1994; (2) assurance of continued lawful immigration status for individuals who were lawfully in the United States on June 5, 1989; (3) authori- zation for employment of Chinese nationals present in the United States on June 5, 1989; and (4) notice of expiration of nonimmigrant status, rather than institution of deportation proceedings, for individuals eligible for deferral of enforced departure whose nonimmigrant status has expired. In addition, I have directed that enhanced consideration be provided under the immigration laws for individuals from any country who express a fear of persecution upon return to their country related to that country's family planning policy of forced abortion or coerced sterilization. 2 These further actions will provide effectively the same protection as would H.R. 2712 as presented to me on November 21, 1989. Indeed, I am exercising my authority to provide opportunity for employment to a wider class of Chinese aliens than the statute would have required. My action today provides complete assurance that the United States will provide to Chinese nationals here the protection they deserve. It has always been my view, and it is my policy as President, that the United States shall not return any person to a country where he or she faces persecution. I have under current law sufficient authority to provide the necessary relief for Chinese students and others who fear returning to China in the near future. I will continue to exercise vigorously this authority. Waivers granted under this authority will not be revoked. Maintaining flexibility in administering our productive student and scholar exchange program with China is important. As many as 80,000 Chinese have studied and conducted research in the United States since these exchanges began. I want to see these exchanges continue because it is in the national interest of the United States to promote the exchange of technical skills and ideas between Chinese and Americans. It is my hope that by acting administratively, we will help foster the continuation of these programs. My actions today accomplish the laudable objectives of the Congress in passing H.R. 2712 while preserving my ability to manage foreign relations. I would note that, with respect to individuals expressing a fear of persecution related to their country's family planning policies, my actions today provide greater protection than would H.R. 2712 by extending such protection worldwide rather than just to Chinese nationals. 3 I deplore the violence and repression employed in the Tiananmen events. I believe that China, as its leaders state, will return to the policy of greater reform pursued before June 3. I further believe that the Chinese visitors would wish to return to China in those circumstances, in which case I would hope that the knowledge and experience gained by the Chinese visitors temporarily in our country be applied to help promote China's reforms and modernization. The adjournment of the Congress has prevented my return of H.R. 2712 within the meaning of Article I, section 7, clause 2 of the Constitution. Accordingly, my withholding of approval from the bill precludes its becoming law. The Pocket Veto Case, 279 U.S. 655 (1929). Because of the questions raised in opinions issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, I am sending H.R. 2712 with my objections to the Clerk of the House of Representatives. THE WHITE HOUSE, November 30, 1989. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON November 28, 1989 TO: CHIEF OF STAFF FROM: JAMES W. CICCONI Assistant to the President and Deputy to the Chief of Staff Attached is the Congressional letter on the Chinese student bill. Also enclosed is the memo you asked me to write on pocket veto Catch-22. give Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet (George Bush Library) Document No. Subject/Title of Document Date Restriction Class. and Type 02. Memo From Jim Cicconi to John Sununu 11/28/89 P/5 Re: Disapproval of H.R. 2712: Immigration Relief for Chinese Students (1 pp.) Collection: Record Group: Bush Presidential Records Office: Chief of Staff, White House Office of Open on Expiration of PRA Series: Sununu, John, Files (Document Follows) Subseries: Issues Files By If (NLGB) on 5/12/05 WHORM Cat.: File Location: H.R. 2712/Chinese Students (1989) [2] Date Closed: 12/2/2004 OA/ID Number: 29144-006 FOIA/SYS Case #: 1998-0004-F[1] Appeal Case #: Re-review Case #: 2005-0426-S Appeal Disposition: & P-2/P-5 Review Case #: Disposition Date: AR Case #: MR Case #: AR Disposition: MR Disposition: AR Disposition Date: MR Disposition Date: RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] P-1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA] (b)(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P-2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA] (b)(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an P-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA] agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or (b)(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] (b)(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P-5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] (b)(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] (b)(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of (b)(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] (b)(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information PRM. Removed as a personal record misfile. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON November 28, 1989 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF FROM: Jim Cicconi SUBJECT: Disapproval of H.R. 2712: Immigration Relief for Chinese Students In your conversations with the President on whether to sign or veto the bill extending the stay of Chinese students, there is an added point you should weigh carefully. This relates to the pocket veto. In short, to protect the President's prerogative to pocket veto bills when Congress is not in session, we have maintained that a return of the bill (i.e. a normal veto) is not possible since there is no agent of the Congress empowered to accept it when they are not meeting. Congress, of course, disputes this view; we have, however, acted consistent with it so far. Our quandary is this: if we pocket veto the bill, it is more open to challenge by private plaintiffs (as opposed to Congress). This is not ideal for a test case. It will also keep alive a politically volatile issue throughout the court challenge. Finally, if we lose, the bill becomes law. If, on the other hand, we do a regular return veto (or a hybrid of pocket and return) we will badly undercut our argument for sustaining any future test of the pocket veto since, by returning a bill when Congress is out, we implicitly agree that Congress has an agent in town empowered to receive measures on its behalf. I realize that I'm presenting you with a series of bad choices if we do a regular return veto, we undercut our assertion of a pocket veto power, and would quite possibly be overridden when Congress returns in January. And if we pocket veto the bill, it will be challenged in court on less than favorable (for us) legal grounds, with attendant and lengthy press criticism during the case. Obviously, we will do our best whatever the President decides, but I thought you should be aware of the problems. Boyden and I have discussed the above, and he concurs. Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet (George Bush Library) Document No. Subject/Title of Document Date Restriction Class. and Type 03. Memo From Fred McClure to POTUS 11/28/89 P/S Re: H.R. 2712: Emergency Chinese Immigration Relief Act of 1989 (1 pp.) Collection: Record Group: Bush Presidential Records Office: Chief of Staff, White House Office of Open on Expiration of PRA Series: Sununu, John, Files (Document Follows) Subseries: Issues Files By SP (NLGB) on 12/12/07 WHORM Cat.: File Location: H.R. 2712/Chinese Students (1989) [2] Date Closed: 12/2/2004 OA/ID Number: 29144-006 FOIA/SYS Case #: 1998-0004-F[1] Appeal Case #: Re-review-Case #: 2005-0426-S Appeal Disposition: P-2/P-5 Review Case #: Disposition Date: AR Case #: MR Case #: AR Disposition: MR Disposition: AR Disposition Date: MR Disposition Date: RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] P-1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA] (b)(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P-2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA] (b)(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an P-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA] agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or (b)(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] (b)(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P-5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]. (b)(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] (b)(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of (b)(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] (b)(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information PRM. Removed as a personal record misfile. THE PRESIDENT HAS SEEN THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON November 28, 1989 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT 1989 NOV 28 PM 7: 07 FROM: FREDERICK D. McCLURE SUBJECT: > H.R. 2712; Emergency Chinese Immigration Relief Act of 1989 This evening we received by hand delivery the attached letter concerning H.R. 2712, the Emergency Chinese Immigration Relief Act of 1989, signed by 55 Senators. You will note the bipartisan nature of the signatories. This measure is one of those in which we noted during floor consideration that the Administration opposed the measure's enactment. The letter was originated by Senators Bill Armstrong (R-CO) and Ted Kennedy (D-MA). Kennedy is chairman of the Immigration Subcommittee. Armstrong is the only member of the Republican leadership who signed the letter. The Senate Majority Leader, George Mitchell, is also a signatory. Senator Alan Simpson (R-WY), ranking member of the Immigration Subcommittee, made a very strong floor statement in opposition to the bill. I decided to forward the letter to you, particularly given the philosophical mix represented by the signers. Attachment United States Senate WASHINGTON, DC 20510 November 28, 1989 The President The White House Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: We are writing to urge you to support Chinese students in America in their struggle for democracy in China by signing into law the "Emergency Chinese Immigration Relief Act of 1989.' Today's extraordinary flowering of democracy in Eastern Europe reminds us of a similar movement just a few months ago in China, but which was brutally suppressed. This bill adopted by Congress provides new hope to a beleaguered democratic effort for freedom in China by protecting its most effective representatives -- the Chinese students in America. Yet, with every day that passes, more and more students fall into unlawful status through the expiration of their visas. And while you have acted to assure them they will not be deported before June 5, 1990, they live in constant fear that whatever they say or do in America today will bring punishment should they be required to return after that date. Our bill also establishes for the first time in our law that asylum is available to victims of China's "one couple, one child" policies. You vetoed one bill over U.N. population funding for China; you should support this bill which protects the victims of that same policy. However, your representatives have indicated that this important measure may be subject to a veto or pocket veto. It is significant that the primary opposition to the bill comes not from the United States, but from the Chinese government -- the very government that ordered the troops into Tiananmen Square in June. Mr. President, your representatives have articulated three reasons for a veto. First, they claim that the Chinese government may suspend educational exchange programs if this bill is enacted. We ask you not to be intimidated by cynical threats made in Beijing. China has already suspended the Fulbright program in June, under which our scholars go there, and only a handful of Chinese scholars have been able to leave China under the Exchange Visitor Program in the past few months. It is clear that the Chinese government will send here only the most ideologically tested and "reliable" students for the foreseeable future, and, should Beijing decide in the future to restore the Fulbright program, there is no doubt that our - 2 - scholars would be subjected to far greater scrutiny than they were before the Tiananmen massacre. Second, your representatives state that the bill would hamper efforts to restore Sino-American relations to their I pre-June levels. Our first priority must be to stand with the students who are here and have played such a significant role in the pro-democracy movement in China. The very fact that so many of the students here have been harrassed by officials of their own embassy for their pro-democracy activities suggests their vulnerability if returned to China, and this bill addresses that vulnerability in concrete, legislative terms. Finally, your representatives state that this bill is not needed because the Attorney General has already acted to defer any departures until next June But, Mr. President, this is only a few months away. Students are already concerned about their fate after that time, and have scaled down their pro-democracy activities as that deadline approaches. Many even fear that to participate in the Attorney General's deferred departure program becomes an act of rebellion against the Chinese government, and marks them for retribution once that program is ended and they are required to return. This bill provides them with the security they need to plan their lives and pursue their dreams of a more democratic future in China. Mr. President, we understand your desire to strike the proper balance between maintaining ties with Beijing and being faithful to those who promote democracy. We urge you not to aid the campaign of intimidation and harassment that the Chinese authorities have waged against these students by vetoing this bill. Just as you have celebrated the courage of the peoples of Eastern Europe in their recent democratic successes, we ask only that you support the students of China in their continuing struggle. With respect and best wishes, Sincerely, William L. Armstrong Edward M. Kennedy shade J Slade Gorton Paul Simon 95 orgs Mitchell George J. Mitchell - 3 - Air Braic Quentin N. Burdick John John Glenn Slenn Andell ford Herb Kohl Wendell H. Ford Herbert Kohl Mikh male Mitch McConnell Rudy Boschwitz Ohnis G. Halch Orrin G. Hatch Bill Am Bradley Body Tempanford Terry Sanford Pete Wilson Chis Dodn Christopher J. Dodd RoberT 6. Robert C. Byrd Byrd Boel Claims Dennis De Concinio Brock Adams Dennis DeConcini hiy Roh Knira Mark O. Hatfield Robert W. Kasten, Jr. Vimothy Timothy E. Wirth k', Wuth Daniel Patrick Moynihan - 4 - Gordon J. Humphrey Joseph /or/Side Dan Dan Coats Coats Walcolm Malcolm Wallop Wallop & like Joseph I. Lieberman for Donald W. Pipe Riegle, Jr. Dave Developmenting Durenberger Dhu M.Cain John McCain Chri Rit Bond stopher S. Bond John Heinz Alan Cranston Alan Cranston this Ernest Holling Hollings Steve Symons the John Steve F. Symms 1. Kerry they Dale Bangen Dale Bumpers Phil Framm Phil Gramm all Specte Claim P.. Arlen Specter Claiborne Pell Patel Leahy Patrick J. Leahy Conrad Burns - 5 - Carl Frank Carl Levin R. Lautenberg Lening Paul Paul a J. James S. Sarbanes Exon Sarbanes Zom Harkin Worndbayor Tom Harkin David Pryor Howard M. Metzenbaum Daniel K. Inouye Layd Lloyd Bentsen Beaton JeeP William S. Cohen Jim James A. Miclure McClure Jesse Jesse Helms Helms