Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
4525635
label
University Press Club of Michigan, November 11, 1949
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
4525635
contentType
document
title
University Press Club of Michigan, November 11, 1949
collections
Gerald R. Ford Congressional Papers
Speeches
subjects
Press
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
4525635
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1949-11-30
month
11
year
1949
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1949-11-01
month
11
year
1949
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
84ec7f595e269155
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box D13, folder "University Press Club of Michigan, November 11, 1949" of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. The Council donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box D13 of The Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library UNIVERSITY PRESS CLUB OF MICHIGAN Speech by Rep. Gerald R. Ford, Jr. Friday, November 11, 1949 THE FOURTH ESTATE IN MODERN POLITICS Mr. Hoyhow, honored guests, and members of the University Press Club, I feel highly honored for the opportunity to speak at this luncheon during the thirty-second annual meeting of the University Press Club of Michigan. Recently I read several lines of imaginary dialogue which seem most apropos. They go as follows: "Man said to the Universe, 'Sir, I exist.' "The Universe replied, 'That fact has not created within me a sense of obligation. This imaginary dialogue between man and the universe very nearly sums up the dilemma in which we find ourselves today. Yes, our civilization does exist but we, as a part of that civilization, would be foolhardy to assume that our way of life - 1 - GERALD FORD LIBRARY will continue to exist unless we solve the multitudinous problems that confront us and those problems are more than a little staggering from whatever appraisal we make. Those who are concerned and who do think of the possible consequences and who are capable of acting, have the greatest responsibility since Noah at the time of the great flood. Noah faced a world about to be engulfed by water--we face an equally terrifying phenomena, a world about to be engulfed by atomic disaster. It is perfectly obvious to everyone except the most impractical of dreamers that there is no simple solution to the challenges of our generation. The myriad of problems calls for steady nerves, cool heads, unrelenting courage and above all else an awareness of the TRUTH in its purest meaning. We need the unvarnished, the undiluted truth of the facts as they exist. The truth of reality is a prime requisite in the dynamic days ahead. There is no room for premeditated or careless inaccuracies, - 2 - GERALD FORD LIBRART nor should we foster or condone charlatanism. There's no room for bare-faced sensationalism or P. T. Barnum pettifogging. With each step we take in the era ahead we must be aware that we march with the appalling knowledge that misrepresentation of the truth means likely disaster. Our course must be guided by and tied to the truth. If we have the facts our day-to-day course will be unerring. If we do have the facts we can depend on the judgment of our citizens. On whom does the burden rest most heavily for the guidance of humanity in this crucial hour? On the college professor or the education profession generally? The research expert? Is this a task for the clergy? Yes, a part of this burden unquestionably rests with our academic and spiritual leaders. But, they cannot carry the burden alone. Frankly, the strength of the forces at work is too great for even the best-intentioned educators and clergymen. - 3 - FORD & LIBRARY GERALD Next, shall we say that the politician will give us the requisite help. I would like to think that young men like myself with the aid of mellower leaders would be the answer to our problem but it is a fact, not necessarily derogatory either, that the politician, no matter how forthright his motives, is to some degree the weather vane of public opinion. It is our job to do what the majority thinks fitting and proper. We would be usurping the representative posts to which we were elected if we made our own judgments decisive in complete disregard of our constituents' wishes. Under our form of government we are bound by the expressed will of the people, the real question, what will the "will of the people" be? Thus, in the final analysis we inevitably come to the conclusion that the gravest responsibility rests with the day-to-day makers of public opinion and in this category I put the owners, who editors, and reporters who by subtle indirection or by straight- - 4 - FORD i LIBRARY GERALD forward news reporting make the news which in turn makes public opinion. Gentlemen, you and your associates are the real key to the dilemma of modern politics. In the exercise of your daily business, not necessarily in the wooks preceding an election, you determine to a large extent the course of things to come--be it war, peace, fascism, democracy. You are the hub of the big wheel that takes us toward our destiny. In all sincerity I am flattered to have this opportunity to discuss these matters with you. "The Fourth Estate in Modern Politics." Gentlemen, you are politics. Perhaps some in the audience may question this statement. Is it really true? Those here who write daily editorials undoubtedly in the past on some occasions, have dispaired at public indifference to your expressions of scholarly opinion. It can be shown, and is admitted by most, that the last presidential campaign was won despite the editorial policies of most newspapers. - 5 - FORD & LIBRARY GERALD Perhaps our voters were misled by certain forces but the real question is yet unanswered: What produced this totally unexpected result? Thousands of words have been written and spoken on the subject but most of the attempted explanations fail to analyze the real reason for the election of Mr. Truman. In my estimation the answer is not as paradoxical as one might think. The best answer is a true understanding of the medium in which you gentlemen work every day. It is unfortunate but true that editorials are not as influential as they should be. A recent personal experience has rather conclusively proved the point to me that a well-written editorial fails to catch the eye of the general public, whereas a news story on the first page strikes home. Early in this past session of the 81st Congress I voted for a new immigration bill that had the full support of the authorities in the field, including the State Department and the - 6 - FRALE 8080 Immigration and Naturalization Service. Representative Walter Judd, one of the foremost Far Eastern authorities, had initially fostered this proposal which aimed at eliminating racial discrimination in our quota system and truly equalizing quotas for all peoples. The bill incidentally increased the Japanese quota from 100 to 185 annually. Within the past month a candidate in the Democratic Congressional primary in September, 1948 has been distributing printed match folders throughout the Fifth district informing the citizens that I voted to increase Japanese immigration by 85%. One of the Grand Rapids newspapers contacted me and wanted the full story. I gave them the facts and a front page story appeared with a good picture of Representative Judd, who happened to be in Grand Rapids to speak before the Michigan Educational Association. The following day the paper carried an excellent editorial on the same question. - 7 - FORD i LIBRARY GERALD Within the past several weeks a number of citizens have written commenting on the deceptive literature being distributed by this particular individual and in most instances the writers have enclosed a copy of the front page news story, not the editorial, despite the fact that the editorial, in reality, gave the true facts more lucidly. This experience is the best evidence that a news story can directly affect public opinion. In the aforementioned illustration both the editorial and the news item related the identical facts without deviation, but if one had been different from the other, the news story would have been controlling to a large degree. The true barometer of public opinion is news, daily news, "slant 7 givin The news its tone, its color. The insinuations that may be commonplace are most influential. From time to time I have been thoroughly amused by the inconsistencies that exist between the facts as stated on the - 8 - FORD & LIBRARY GERALD editorial pages and the overtones implied on the same paper within news columns or simple headlines as they are written by the reporters down the line. An example might be an editorial entitled "Profits Make Progress" while in the same issue these headlines might counteract the effect of the editorial. These headlines are as follows: "General Motors Shows Greatest Income in History," and "Housing Conditions in City Revealed to be Barbaric. 11 These inconsistencies, although completely fortuitious, nevertheless seem to make a partial mockery of the seriously thought- out editorial, which is supposed to guide readers to a better under- standing of a certain way of life or a political issue. These contrasts collide with each other head-on like two express freights on the same rails. Regardless of the merits of the particular ideological viewpoint of either the editorial or the news column, the fact is that they clash glaringly. The public, more strongly inclined to believe that which - 9 - FORD & LIBRARY GERALD is presented as news, if we can believe what took place in November, 1948, comes to a conclusion just the reverse of what the editorial sought to explain with careful precision. The editor has per- mitted himself to be sabotaged or circumvented, either directly or by mere chance, by his own copy boy, SO to speak. The editor's thoughtful consideration may as well have been spent in more enjoyable pursuits. I thoroughly appreciate that there is an almost sacred tradition in the newspaper business from the top to the bottom that "news is news" and that it must not be tampered with for the sake of any personal or political point of view. To this long- standing doctrine I heartily subscribe and certainly I hope that it will never be otherwise. The deviations or the inconsistencies that seem to arise do not come from editorial quarters, nor from bosses who sit up nights plotting to maintain a certain point of view. It has been - 10 - FRALD my observation that more frequently the situation arises from the ardent headline writer who inadvertantly or otherwise may slant his story. How many times have you gentlemen had this happen in your own experiences? I recently experienced a case that may be in point. Several weeks ago, shortly after returning to the district from the first session of the 81st Congress, I was contacted concerning the recent coal strike. It was vividly brought to my attention that there was a serious coal shortage for home consumption in our part of Michigan. After an appraisal of the situation in detail I telegraphed President Truman, telling him of the factual situation do all he could for to hasten a peaceful and urging that he do what he could for the benefit of all concerned. settlene The headline that night read "Ford Urges Truman Act, Sends President Plea to end coal Strike.' " No one can avoid the conclusion from this headline that my sympathies were in no way tolerant to the coal miners side of - 11 - FORD & LIBRARY GERALD Surely the argument It would appear from this headline that I have no sympathy with some of the requests of the coal miners in their long struggle for equitable pay and working conditions. I would guess that the public felt that Ford wanted the coal strike ended with punitive measures against the men in the pits. This kind of indirect editorializing or fact making has become more and more frequent as newspapers have increased in size and administrative complexity. Is the answer better generalship by the owners and managers, or is it a greater realization on the part of the newsmen that their part in the day-to-day operation of the paper is of vital importance. I appreciate that authority must be delegated to the men in the news room and the men in the news field should rightfully assume the responsibility so delegated. However, in the production line of news coverage and reporting, on many occasions there may originate a personal point of viewor slanting. The individual touch may originate on the spot where the news is - 13 - FORD & LIBRARY GERALD recorded, it may come in the communication of the story through the wire services, or it may get the slant with the headline writer who puts on the final touch at the last moment. This process of news shading is often the direct result of employes' personal philosophy of government. At a time when extremely we need the truth and the facts ) it may be dangerous to have a n disguised point of view set forth as pure news. Can we say it is likewise dangerous to have a slant to our editorials? No, because to a greater degree the public knows the political leanings of the newspaper management. With that previous knowledge and information the reading public can properly balance the pros and cons, and no subtle harm is accomplished. The popular thing nowadays on the editorial page is to have the local editorial column plus several syndicated columns by outside experts and analysts with widely divergent points of - 13 - FORD & LIBRARY GERALD We are all cognegant of the trends in some quarters to rely on sensationalism to boot ancutation. 20 that good sense or can we say "For a dollar gained a world is lost". FORD i LIBRARY GERALD view on political matters. Such a policy is sound and in the best American newspaper tradition of fair play to all concerned. The reading of such slanted columns in fact is desirable as as long an equitable distribution of doses is applied. a In conclusion let me reiterate the need and necessity for the Fourth Estate in Modern Politics, but let me also emphasize the urgency for the exposure of the truth in the news by the Fourth Estate. The day-to-day craftsmanship in putting a newspaper together must be maintained at the highest possible level or the consequences to us all may well be disastrous. I am confident that if our news is untarnished, if we get the truth, the good judgment of the people will not be in error. The Fourth Estate inthrige has that solemn responsibility of real accuracy in modern politics. FORD & LIBRARY GERALD UNIVERSITY PRESS CLUB OF MICHIGAN Speech by Rep. Gerald R. Ford, Jr. Friday, November 11, 1949 THE FOURTH ESTATE IN MODERN POLITICS Mr. Hoyhow, honored guests, and members of the University Press Club, I feel highly honored for the opportunity to speak at this luncheon during the thirty-second annual meeting of the University Press Club of Michigan. Recently I read several lines of imaginary dialogue which seem most apropos. They go as follows: "Man said to the Universe, 'Sir, I exist.' "The Universe replied, "That fact has not created within me a sense of obligation." This imaginary dialogue between man and the universe very nearly sums up the dilemma in which we find ourselves today. Yes, our civilization does exist but we, as a part of that civilisation, would be foolhardy to assume that our way of life - 1 - FORD i LIBRARY GERALD will continue to exist unless we solve the multitudinous problems that confront us and those problems are more than a little staggering from whatever appraisal we make. Those who are concerned and who do think of the possible consequences and who are capable of acting, have the greatest responsibility since Noah at the time of the great flood. Noah faced a world about to be engulfed by water--we face an equally terrifying phenomena, 8 world about to be engulfed by atomic disaster. It is perfectly obvious to everyone except the most impractical of dreamers that there is no simple solution to the challenges of our generation. The myriad of problems calls for steady nerves, cool heads, unrelenting courage and above all else an awareness of the TRUTH in its purest meaning. We need the unvarnished, the undiluted truth of the facts as they exist. The truth of reality is a prime requisite in the dynamic days ahead. There is no room for premeditated or careless inaccuracies, - 2 - FORD i LIBRARY GERALD nor should we foster or condone charlatanism. There's no room for bare-faced sensationalism or P. T. Barnum pettifogging. With each step we take in the era ahead we must be aware that we march with the appalling knowledge that misrepresentation of the truth means likely disaster. Our course must be guided by and tied to the truth. If we have the facts our day-to-day course will be unerring. If we do have the facts we can depend on the judgment of our citizens. On whom does the burden rest most heavily for the guidance of humanity in this crucial hour? On the college professor or the education profession generally? The research expert? Is this a task for the clergy? Yes, a part of this burden unquestionably rests with our academic and spiritual leaders. But, they cannot carry the burden alone. Frankly, the strength of the forces at work is too great for even the best-intentioned educators and clergymen. - 3 - FORD & LIBRARY GERALD Next, shall we say that the politician will give us the requisite help. I would like to think that young men like myself with the aid of mellower leaders would be the answer to our problem but it is a fact, not necessarily derogatory either, that the politician, no matter how forthright his motives, is to some degree the weather vane of public opinion. It is our job to do what the majority thinks fitting and proper. We would be usurping the representative posts to which we were elected if we made our own judgments decisive in complete disregard of our constituents' wishes. Under our form of government we are bound by the expressed will of the people, the real question, what will the "will of the people" be? Thus, in the final analysis we inevitably come to the conclusion that the gravest responsibility rests with the day-to-day makers of public opinion and in this category I put the owners, editors, and reporters who by subtle indirection or by straight- - 4 - GERALD FORD LIBRARY forward news reporting make the news which in turn makes public opinion. Gentlemen, you and your associates are the real key to the dilemma of modern politics. In the exercise of your daily business, not necessarily in the weeks preceding an election, you determine to a large extent the course of things to come-be it war, peace, fascism, democracy. You are the hub of the big wheel that takes us toward our destiny. In all sincerity I am flattered to have this opportunity to discuss these matters with you. "The Fourth Estate in Modern Politics." Gentlemen, you are politics. Perhaps some in the audience may question this statement. Is it really true? Those here who write daily editorials undoubtedly in the past on some occasions, have dispaired at public indifference to your expressions of scholarly opinion. It can be shown, and is admitted by most, that the last presidential campaign was won despite the editorial policies of most newspapers. - 5 - GERALD R.FORD LIBRARY Perhaps our voters were misled by certain forces but the real question is yet unanswered: What produced this totally unexpected result? Thousands of words have been written and spoken on the subject but most of the attempted explanations fail to analyze the real reason for the election of Mr. Truman. In my estimation the answer is not as paradoxical as one might think. The best answer is a true understanding of the medium in which you gentlemen work every day. It is unfortunate but true that editorials are not as influential as they should be. A recent personal experience has rather conclusively proved the point to me that a well-written editorial fails to catch the eye of the general public, whereas a news story on the first page strikes home. Early in this past session of the 81st Congress I voted for a new immigration bill that had the full support of the authorities in the field, including the State Department and the - 6 - FORD i LIBRARY GERALD Immigration and Naturalization Service. Representative Walter Judd, one of the foremost Far Eastern authorities, had initially fostered this proposal which aimed at eliminating racial discrimination in our quota system and truly equalizing quotas for all peoples. The bill incidentally increased the Japanese quota from 100 to 185 annually. Within the past month a candidate in the Democratic Congressional primary in September, 1948 has been distributing printed match folders throughout the Fifth district informing the citizens that I voted to increase Japanese immigration by 85% One of the Grand Rapids newspapers contacted me and wanted the full story I gave them the facts and a front page story appeared with a good picture of Representative Judd, who happened to be in Grand Rapids to speak before the Michigan Educational Association. The following day the paper carried an excellent editorial on the same question. - 7 - FORD i LIBRARY GERALD Within the past several weeks a number of citizens have written commenting on the deceptive literature being distributed by this particular individual and in most instances the writers have enclosed a copy of the front page news story, not the editorial, despite the fact that the editorial, in reality, gave the true facts more lucidly. This experience is the best evidence that a news story can directly affect public opinion. In the aforementioned illustration both the editorial and the news item related the identical facts without deviation, but if one had been different from the other, the news story would have been controlling to a large degree. The true barometer of public opinion is news, daily news, its tone, its color. The insinuations that may be commonplace are most influential. From time to time I have been thoroughly amused by the inconsistencies that exist between the facts as stated on the FORD i LIBRARY GERALD - 8 - editorial pages and the overtones implied on the same paper within news columns or simple headlines as they are written by the reporters down the line. An example might be an editorial entitled "Profits Make Progress" while in the same issue these headlines might counteract the effect of the editorial. These headlines are as follows: "General Motors Shows Greatest Income in History," and "Housing Conditions in City Revealed to be Barbaric." These inconsistencies, although completely fortuitious, nevertheless seen to make a partial mockery of the seriously thought- out editorial, which is supposed to guide readers to a better under- standing of a certain way of life or a political issue. These contrasts collide with each other head-on like two express freights on the same rails. Regardless of the merits of the particular ideological viewpoint of either the editorial or the news column, the fact is that they clash glaringly. The public, more strongly inclined to believe that which - 9 - FORD 2 LIBRARY GERALD is presented as news, if we can believe what took place in November, 1948, comes to a conclusion just the reverse of what the editorial sought to explain with careful precision. The editor has per- mitted himself to be sabotaged or circumvented, either directly or by mere chance, by his own copy boy, so to speck. The editor's thoughtful consideration may as well have been spent in more enjoyable pursuits. I thoroughly appreciate that there is an almost sacred tradition in the newspaper business from the top to the bottom that "news is news" and that it must not be tampered with for the sake of any personal or political point of view. To this long- standing doctrine I heartily subscribe and certainly I hope that it will never be otherwise. The deviations or the inconsistencies that seem to arise do not come from editorial quarters, nor from bosses who sit up nights plotting to maintain a certain point of view. It has been - 10 - FORD i LIBRARY GERALD my observation that more frequently the situation arises from the ardent headline writer who inadvertantly or otherwise may slant his story. How many times have you gentlemen had this happen in your own experiences? I recently experienced a case that may. be in point. Several weeks ago, shortly after returning to the district from the first session of the 81st Congress, I was contacted concerning the recent coal strike. It was vividly brought to my attention that there was a serious coal shortage for home consumption in our part of Michigan. After an appraisal of the situation in detail I telegraphed President Truman, telling him of the factual situation and urging that he do what he could for the benefit of all concerned. The headline that night read "Ford Urges Truman Act, Sends President Plea to end coal Strike." No one can avoid the conclusion from this headline that my sympathies were in no way tolerant to the coal miners' side of - 11 - FORD i LIBRARY GERALD the argument. It would appear from this headline that I have no sympathy with some of the requests of the coal miners in their long struggle for equitable pay and working conditions. I would guess that the public felt that Ford wanted the coal strike ended with punitive measures against the men in the pits. This kind of indirect editorializing or fact making has become more and more frequent as newspapers have increased in size and administrative complexity. Is the answer better generalship by the owners and managers, or is it a greater realization on the part of the newsmen that their part in the day-to-day operation of the paper is of vital importance. I appreciate that authority must be delegated to the men in the news room and the men in the news field should rightfully assume the responsibility so delegated. However, in the production line of news coverage and reporting, on many occasions there may originate a personal point of viewor slanting. The individual touch may originate on the spot where the news is - 13 - FORD i LIBRARY GERALD recorded, it may come in the communication of the story through the wire services, or it may get the slant with the headline writer who puts on the final touch at the last moment. This process of news shading is often the direct result of employes' personal philosophy of government. At a time when we need the truth and the facts it may be dangerous to have a disguised point of view set forth as pure news. Can we say 1t is likewise dangerous to have a slant to our editorials? No, because to a greater degree the public knows the political leanings of the newspaper management. With that previous knowledge and information the reading public can properly balance the pros and cons, and no subtle harm is accomplished. The popular thing nowadays on the editorial page is to have the local editorial column plus several syndicated columns by outside experts and analysts with widely divergent points of - 13 - GERALD FORD LIBRARY view on political matters. Such a policy is sound and in the best American newspaper tradition of fair play to all concerned. The reading of such slanted columns in fact is desirable as long as an equitable distribution of doses is applied. In conclusion let me reiterate the need and necessity for the Fourth Estate in Modern Politics, but let me also emphasize the urgency for the exposure of the truth in the news by the Fourth Estate. The day-to-day craftsmanship in putting a newspaper together must be maintained at the highest possible level or the consequences to us all may well be disastrous. I am confident that if our news is untarnished, if we get the truth, the good judgment of the people will not be in error. The Fourth Estate has that solemn responsibility of real accuracy in modern politics. RALO GERALD, FORD