Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
4526339
label
Industrial Relations Group, Davenport College, Grand Rapids, MI, November 20, 1970
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
4526339
contentType
document
title
Industrial Relations Group, Davenport College, Grand Rapids, MI, November 20, 1970
collections
Gerald R. Ford Congressional Papers
Speeches
subjects
Legislation
Unemployment
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
4526339
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1970-11-30
month
11
year
1970
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1970-11-01
month
11
year
1970
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
53635a1ee504f1d9
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box D30, folder "Industrial Relations Group, Davenport College, Grand Rapids, MI, November 20, 1970" of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. The Council donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. MR. FORD 11/20/70 maffice Copy SPEECH BEFORE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS GROUP, DAVENPORT COLLEGE Congressman Gerald R. Ford today hailed the Unemployemnt Compensation Amendment of 1970 as a "major legislative achievement of the 91st Congress." Speaking before the Grand Rapids Industrial Relations Group at Davenport College, Ford noted that the new unemployment compensation law gives coverage to an additional 4,750,000 jobs. This, he said, is the largest single increase in coverage since the Workman's compensation program was started 35 years ago. The new law, Ford said, eliminates the two chief complaints leveled against state administration of unemployment compensation. The new statute prohibits States from denying Workman's Compensation to persons taking approved job training and declares that compensation shall not be denied or reduced if a person filed his claim in another state. Ford also pointed to other significant provisions in the new legislation - establishment of an unemployment compensation research program, federal grants to train unemployment compensation personnel, and a federal advisory commission on unemployment compensation to review the entire program and make recommendations to the Congress. To provide for the expanded coverage under the new law, employer contri- butions will be increased by 1/10th of 1% to a new rate of .5%. The base to which the new rate is applied will be increased on January 1, 1972 to $4,000 from the present base of $3,500/ Ford also reviewed the status of other legislation in the Labor-Management field still pending in the 92st Congress. The Administration's Manpower Training Bill has passed the Senate and will be the first order of business in the House when Congress reconvenes. It is scheduled for November 17. This is a bipartisan bill and should encounter no difficulties, Ford Said. FORD & LIBRARY GERALD Digitized from Box D30 of The Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library The status of Occupational Safety legislation ès the same in the House and the Senate. Virtually identical bills have been reported out by House and Senate Labor Committees, and administration substitutes for these committee bills will be offered on the House and Senate floors. The Senate will take up the legistation immediately upon reconvening. The House will act after disposing of the Manpower Training Bill. Under the Committee bills the Secretary of Labor would set the safety standards, order inspections, conduct hearings, issue orders, and take appeals into court. Under the Administration substitute, a special committee would set the safety stamdards. This Committee, appointed by the President, must be made up of experts in the fields of safety and health. The Secretary of Labor would Investigate complaints. If his inspectors find violations, hearings would be conducted before an independent committee, different in membership from the Committee which set the standards. The Secretary could appeal the findings of this committee to the course. Industry favors the Committee approach, as provided by the Administration Bill; Labor favors granting complete authority to the Secretary of Labor. Ford said there almost certainly will be no further action this year on Fair Employment Practices legislation. He pointed out that although the legislation has passed the Senate, the House bill has not yet been granted a rule for the consideration of it on the House floor. The basic disagreement over Fair Employment Practices legislation is over methods of enforcement. However, objectives of the competing bills are the same. An administration bill would give the equal employment opportunity commission expanded powers but would require the committee to go into court for enforcement of its ruling. FORD is LIBRARY The Senate approved bill would transform the E.E.O.C. into a quasi-judicial body which would issue cease and desist orders. Ford said there is no movement on legislation to supplant the National Labor Relations Board with Labor Courts. He said however, that the complexion of the Board is tending to become more conservative with the appointment of a new chairman, Edward Miller and the pending appointment of a new member, Ralph Kennedy. There are no developments in the area of "right to work", Ford added. He said there currently is no push on the part of the unions for the repeal of Section 14-B of the Taft-Hartley Act, which leaves the union shop question to the States. NOTE TO MR. FORD: The Press Release data on this statement will cmit all references to the NLRB and right to work, also the detail with regard to the new Unemployment Compensation Law. GERALD