Ask the Scholar

{
    "localId": "475282978",
    "label": "National Right to Work Committee (2)",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/475282978"
}

{
    "id": "475282978",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/475282978",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "National Right to Work Committee (2)",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/475282978",
    "collections": [
        "John C. Vickerman Files (Ford Administration)",
        "John Vickerman's Meetings and Briefings Files"
    ],
    "subjects": [
        "Right to labor",
        "Labor unions",
        "Civil service",
        "White House briefings"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0166/645344/475282978.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0166/645344/475282978.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0166/645344/475282978.pdf",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/475282978",
    "naId": 475282978,
    "coverageEndDate": {
        "logicalDate": "1975-10-31",
        "month": 10,
        "year": 1975
    },
    "coverageStartDate": {
        "logicalDate": "1975-01-01",
        "month": 1,
        "year": 1975
    },
    "languages": [
        "English"
    ],
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}

{
    "seq": 1,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0166/645344/475282978.pdf",
    "mediaId": "578dd81b8f0f6dd5",
    "ocrText": "The original documents are located in Box 19, folder \"National Right to Work\nCommittee (2)\" of the John C. Vickerman Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.\nCopyright Notice\nThe copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of\nphotocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United\nStates of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections.\nWorks prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public\ndomain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to\nremain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid\ncopyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.\nSome items in this folder were not digitized because it contains copyrighted\nmaterials. Please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library for access to\nthese materials.\nTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL\nApril 22, 1975\ncounsel and a former U.S. attorney, Whit-\n20-Year Fight\nney North Seymour Jr., on the right-to-work\nside.\nLast week one explosive Issue in the case\nRight-to-Work Drive:\nwas decided by the Supreme Court in the\nunions' favor. Mr. Rauh had demanded dis-\nA Friend to Workers\nclosure of a sampling of the names of the\nfoundation's financial backers; he said he\nneeded the names to prove his charge that\nOr a Menace to Them?\nthe foundation mainly funnels employers'\nmoney into suits by their employes against\ntheir unions-a practice barred by federal\nlabor law. A lower court ordered disclosure\nTen Big Unions Say Menace,\nof 190 names, and the foundation appealed,\nSeek to Curtail 2 Groups\nsaying disclosure would have a \"chilling ef.\nfect\" on future donors.\nIn Federal Court Action\nMay Risk Jail for Contempt\nBut the Supreme Court refused to stay\nthe order, and it will take effect by the end\nLiberty Bell and Prof. Petro\nof next week. Foundation officials are con-\nsidering putting themselves purposely in\ncontempt of court, risking jail sentences, so\nBy WALTER S. MOSSBERG\nthat they can start a new round of appeals\nStaff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL\ndesigned to avoid disclosure of the names.\nARLINGTON, Va. - In a shiny new\n\"If the word starts getting around that\nglass-and-steel office building here in the\nby sending a contribution in here, your\nWashington suburbs, 60 people-armed with\nname's going to go on a list at the union\ncomputers, press releases and $3.5 million a\nhall,\" Mr. Larson says, \"it could make it\nyear--work every day to drive George\nvery hard to raise funds.\"\nMeany wild.\nConservative politicians and commenta-\nThey form the spearhead of something\ntors have rallied to the right-to-work groups'\ncalled the \"Right-to-Work\" movement,\ncause, likening the situation to a 1950s case\nlargely consisting of two closely linked\ninvolving the state of Alabama. In that case\ngroups, the National Right to Work Commit-\nAlabama was barred from obtaining a list\nfee and the National Right to Work Legal\nof contributors to the NAACP Legal Defense\nDefense Foundation.\nand Educational Fund, on the ground that\nThe two organizations, which share office\nobtaining it would subject the fund's sup-\nspace in the building, spend their time\nporters to possible retaliation from anti-civil\nlobbying in Congress and the press against\nrights forces. Columnist William F. Buckley\nprograms and policies prized by organized\nJr. recently charged that Mr. Rauh's do.\nlabor, and helping individual workers sue\nmand for the names \"once again jeopar.\ntheir unions on various grounds. Each\ndizes his reputation as a true friend of civil\nmonth, they turn out dozens of brochures,\nliberty.\"\nfilms and other items that refer to labor\nIllustrious defenders of the right-to-work\nleaders as \"union czars,\" \"arrogant dicta-\ngroups were a lot harder to come by in 1955\nfors\" and \"elite rulers.\"\nwhen some businessmen and disgruntled\nIn return, unions fire harsh words at the\nrailroad workers formed the National Right\ncommittee and foundation. Last year's\nto Work Committee to oppose the concept of\nUnited Auto Workers convention unani-\nthe union shop: such a contract provision\nmously condemned the groups as \"the tip of\nrequires all employes to join the union\nthe ultra-right iceberg\" and \"the advance\npicked by a majority as bargaining agent.\nmen of neo-fascism.\" The delegates pledged\n(Unions favor such provisions as a way to\nto \"fight against these sinister forces whose\nguarantee their bargaining strength and\nAMERICA\ndesign is to destroy the free labor move-\nguard against \"free riders\" who otherwise\nment.\"\nwould get union services without paying\n\"We're Not Against Unions\"\ndues. The committee views them as compel-\nling some workers to join the union who oth-\nThat is strong stuff indeed. especially\nerwise wouldn't do so.)\nwhen it describes a nonprofit movement\nthat claims as its sole purpose the protec-\nSought State Laws\ntion of the right of workers to choose freely\nThe group's plan was to get more states\nwhether to join unions. \"We're not against\nto pass laws banning the union shop. a step\nunions at all,\" contends Reed Larson, top\npermitted by section 14b of the Taft-Hartley\noperating officer of both the committee and\nAct of 1947. In 1958 the right-to-work cause\nthe foundation, merely against \"compul-\nwas encouraged when a drive supported by\nsory\" membership.\nbusiness groups placed the union-shop issue\nHis contention now is being tested in\non the ballot in six states. But only one of\nthe states, Kansas, voted to ban the union\ncourt. For after 20 years of conflict with the\nshop. To try to salvage the cause, the com-\nright-to-work groups, 10 big unions are suing\nmittee called in Mr. Larson, a Kansas\nthem. The unions-led by the UAW, the Ma-\nright-to-work activist, to take over its then\nchinists, and the State, County and Munici-\ntiny operation.\npal Employes-allege violations of federal\nA lanky. balding former electrical engl.\nlabor laws. They seck 8 sharp curtailment\nneer. the 52-year-old Kansan has led the\nof the groups' legal-aid activities and a for-\nmal declaration that they are primarily an-\ncommittee out of hard times and obscurity.\nUsing sophisticated fund-raising techniques,\nfiunion campaigners.\nhe has broadened its roster of contributors\nThe suit, now in its early stages In fed-\nand beefed up its lobbying operations.\neral court in Washington, promises to be\nTwo of the biggest developments since\ndramatic. It features longtime civil-rights\nactivist Joseph L, Rauh Jr. as the unions'\nPlease Turn to Page 22, Column X\nR\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nGERAL\nWASHINGTON\nLIBRARA AFOX\nTO: John Uncherman\nFROM: DONALD A. WEBSTER\nI seem to recall\nto Call Hugh Newton\nthat you were going\nat Marsh's request.\nthere taking a look\nat his request -\nother imput from him.\nDo you have any\nCoved you let me know\nbefore you leave- ww\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nDATE 3/25/75\nTO: Don webster\nFROM: WAYNE H. VALIS\nFor your information\nPer our conversation\nOther:\nrecondendations For your\nrecommended\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMarch 19, 1975\nMEMO FOR:\nWB\nFROM:\nWV WN\nSUBJECT:\nEnclosed Materials\nPerhaps Vickerman or Webster should\nSEPART R. FORD\narrange a meeting between the National\nRight to Work Committee briefing team\nand appropriate White House staffers on\nCIRRABY\nthe subject of unionism and the expansion\nof union member rights.\ntalk h Por about about -\nsee who Le this é B\nNational Right To Work Committee\nA COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS\nHEADQUARTERS AT THE NATION'S CAPITAL\nMarch 10, 1975\nMr. William Baroody\nSEAL\nOffice of the President\nThe White House\nINSURANCE\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nDear Mr. Baroody:\nRuss Rourk says you will handle this one.\nI am sure you saw the two latest Star articles on public employee\nunionism. You may have missed the resolution by the Governors\nConference (unanimous approval).\nIn addition, a number of members spent two hours last week on the\nfloor of the Senate discussing compulsory sector bargaining laws.\nAttached is a copy of the CR containing their remarks.\nWe look forward to providing some important input to the White\nHouse on this issue.\nSincerely,\nHugh C. Newton\nDirector of Information\nattachments\nHCN: 1h\n_WTB has seen\nWASHINGTON D.C. HEADQUARTERS: 8316 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD (U.S. 50) SUITE 600\nFAIRFAX, VIRGINIA 22030\nTEL. (703) 573-8550\n\"Americans must have the right but not be compelled to join labor unions\"\n456-1414\nFebruary 25, 1975\nMr. John 0. Marsh Jr.\nCounselor to the President\nThe White House\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nDear John:\nDespite the phone call (which I really didn't arrange!), I do\nappreciate your taking a few minutes to talk with me following\nyour talk at last week's Labor Relations luncheon group meeting.\nAs I mentioned, I do hope you will find the time to meet with several\nkey people on the subject of public employee bargaining legislation\n(more appropriately described by noted Labor Law Professor, Dr. Sylvester\nPetro, as compulsory public sector bargaining laws).\nWhile what I am talking about here may not be as immediately important\nas the \"energy crisis, a growing body of Americans believe that the\nsingle most destructive element in today's economic and political\naffairs is the monopoly power of giant labor unions, fostered and\nprotected by special privilege legislation.\nLast fall's election results furthered the possibility of extending\nsuch a destructive element in the private field to the public employment\nfield. Evidence of this can be seen in the front page, 8-column\narticle in the Star last month.\nWhat I have in mind is a briefing team composed of Dr. Petro, Reed\nLarson of the National Right to Work Committee and David Denholm of\nPublic Service Research Council. I am confident that the dialogue\nopened up by such a briefing will make a substantial contribution\nto a better public understanding of the fundamental issues involved\nin so-called public employee collective bargaining labor legislation.\nBy the way, the growth of that understanding should be helped\nconsiderably by a pending Senate floor discussion by several U.S.\nSenators on the meaning and ramifications of the enactment of compulsory\nsector bargaining laws.\nMr. John O. Marsh, Jr.\nFebruary 25, 1975\nPage Two\nI look forward to hearing from you and working with your Russ Rourk\nin setting up this session.\nSincerely,\nHugh C. Newton\nP.S. By the way, that daughter I mentioned who lives in Harrisonburg\nis the goddaughter of a fellow W & L'er -- Gil Bocetti, the football\nstar. Gil now runs his own substantial title insurance company in\nChapel Hill, North Carolina.\nenclosures\nHCN: 1h\ncc: Reed Larson, Andy Hare, National Right to Work Committee\nCB, RL,\nSTATE OF MARYLAND\nEXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT\nANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 21404\nMAR 4 - P.M.\nMARVIN MANDEL\nMarch 3, -1975\nGOVERNOR\nMr. Reed Larson\nNational Right to Work Committee\n8316 Arlington Boulevard\nSuite 600\nFairfax, Virginia 22030\nDear Mr. Larson:\nThis will acknowledge receipt of your recent\nletter in which you let me know of your organization's\nfeelings about public employee bargaining legislation.\nI am taking the liberty of enclosing a copy of\na resolution that was adopted unanimously by the\nNational Governors' Conference during its recent\nWinter Meeting in Washington, D. C. The resolution,\nin my view, accurately reflects the feelings of Governors\nand of the states on this sensitive issue.\nSincerely,\nManyMandel\nGovernor\nPUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELATIONS\nThe United States Congress is considering legislation which\nwould provide to State and local government employees the right to\norganize and collectively bargain. This legislation would substan-\ntially replace individual state laws and procedures which now regu-\nlate these activities with a uniform federal law.\nThe National Governors' Conference opposes federal inter-\nvention in this area. It is the belief of the Nation's Governors that\nmatters relating to the employees of State and local governments\nare within the sole jurisdiction of these units and are not properly\nthe subject of federal legislation.\nThe National Governors' Conference, in adopting this state-\nment, takes no position on the principle of collective bargaining\nfor public employees but states its firm commitment to the view\nthat this is an area which should be left to the discretion of the\nseveral States.\nRESOLUTION BY:\nCommittee on Executive Management and Fiscal Affairs\nNational Governors' Conference\nAdopted - February 20, 1975\nTHE WASHINGTON STAR\nMarch 3, 1975\nPublic Service Union's Ranks,\nPower Grow During Hard Times\nBy John Fialka\nIn June, according to the latest\nWashington Star Staff Writer\nrumors, the city might abolish the en-\nworkers worked for local, state or\nNEW YORK- Dominic Mastrota,\ntire Department of Purchasing.\nfederal governments. Today the\n\"It is a cold type of thing,\" com-\nratio is one in six.\na senior typewriter repairman, will\nnever forget it.\nplains Mastrota.\nThe governmental growth during\nWhat Mastrota and his fellow\nthe last 15 years has been focused al-\nThere he was, sitting in storehouse\nworkers went through is a kind of\nmost entirely in the state and local\nB-53 of the New York Department of\npsychodrama likely to be played\nsector. While the federal government\nFirst of Two Articles\nacross the nation this year as dozens\nhas enlarged slightly, from 2.2 mil-\nof big cities and state governments\nlion to 2.7 million workers, state and\nPurchasing, in the shadow of the\ndiscover the public sector can no\nlocal governments have exploded,\nBrooklyn Bridge, working away as\nlonger afford to live in the style to\njumping from 6 million to 12 million\nhe has for the past 22 years. Three\nwhich it has become accustomed.\nworkers the fastest growing labor\nsector in the country.\nguys wearing business suits suddenly\nInflation and soaring energy bills\nwalked in and announced that the\nhave become the irresistible force,\nThese are the teachers demanded\ncity was going to abolish the entire\nforcing mayors in New York, New-\nfor the war baby boom and the post-\ntypewriter repair unit. Mastrota and\nark, Phoenix, Chicago, Cleveland,\nSputnik era; the extra social work-\nAtlanta and a host of other cities to\ners, policemen and other public serv-\nhis 12 co-workers were to be perma-\nnently laid off.\nplan layoffs. Governors in Wisconsin,\nices demanded by a society that sud-\nRhode Island, Minnesota, New Jer-\ndenly became socially conscious in\nthe 1960's.\nNever mind the 25,000 typewriters\nsey, Massachusetts and Connecticut,\namong others, are also seeking ways\nBut the crashing economy of the\nthe men used to repair: The city was\nto prune state payrolls.\n'70s has placed all this in a harsher\ngoing to contract out the repair work\nreality for local governments as\nor maybe just throw away the ma-\nwell as the man in the street. In New\nchines when they broke down. The\nYork, as elsewhere, the administra-\ncity's budget was in terrible shape,\nWhat makes it all the more com-\ntors reached for the scalpel - a\nMastrota was told, and the jobs had\nplex is that here, as well as else-\ngauntlet not ignored by the AFSCME\nto be cut.\nwhere, the budget cutters come up\nleadership which knows a bread-and-\nUnbelievable. Nobody had threat-\nagainst a seemingly immovable nh-\nbutter challenge when it sees one.\nened to lay off a permanent city em-\nject: the organized politicized public\nThe result has been a confrontation\nploye since Mayor Fiorello LaGuard-\nworker union.\nof giant interests, an exercise in old-\nia tried it during the Depression.\nNowhere is the struggle more\nfashioned muscle-flexing, traditional\nEven he didn't succeed. The city's\nclearly defined than in New York, the\nemotionalism, sophisticated and com-\npayroll grew during his tenure.\nlargest bastion of the American\nplex negotiation. AFSCME, an in-\nFederation of State, County and\ntense mix of rough and tumble trade\nMASTROTA'S feeling that, some-\nMunicipal Employes (AFSCME), the\nunionism and modern-day communi-\nhow, it couldn't be happening was\nnation's largest union of public em-\ncations awareness, moved quickly\nfinally sunk by a pink slip that ar-\nployees: A giant union in a giant city\nand, in the process, demonstrated\nrived in the following day's mail. His\nwith giant problems.\nwhy the union has become a major\nforce nationwide.\nlast day of work was to be Dec. 20.\nBut then, strange things began to\nAFSCME has emerged in the last\nOn. Nov. 22, Mayor Abraham\nhappen.\n15 years to become the fifth largest\nBeame stunned the city by announc-\nAt the last minute, on Dec. 19, the\nmember of the AFL-CIO, with close\ning that he had discovered the city\ncity revoked the dismissal. But the\nto 700,000 members. In an era when\nwould have a $430 million budget\njubilation in storehouse B-53 was\nthe proportion of unionized workers\ndeficit and that 510 permanent city\njobs would have to be sacrificed.\nshortlived, for on Jan. 15 the re-\namong the nation's work force has\nVic Gotbaum, director of AFSC-\npair unit again received pink slips.\nbeen declining, AFSCME has been\nThis time the last day would be Jan.\nsigning up new members at the al-\nME's 110,000 member New York City\nunit, expressed outrage. Beame's\n31.\nmost unheard of rate of 1,000 every\nplan, he charged, called for the\nMastrota had knots in his stomach.\nweek.\n\"death of the city.\" If he had any-\nOne fellow repairman spent the\nOne of the reasons for this growth\nthing to say about it, not one perma-\nweekend vomiting. The strain was al-\nmost unbearable. On Jan. 29 the\nis that the United States is slowly\nnent worker was going to be cut. Got-\ncity again revoked the layoffs, at\nbecoming a nation of bureaucrats. In\nbaum, as it developed, had\nleast until June.\n1960, one out of every nine non-farm\nconsiderable to say about it. The lay-\noffs were canceled.\nTHE WASHINGTON STAR\nMarch 3, 1975\nNot Afraid to Raise Hell\nWurf Puts Emphasis on Organizing\nTo hear Jerry Wurf tell it, the mus-\nber of AFL-CIO unions for failing to\ncle in the U.S. labor movement was\norganize new workers. \"That's not\nbuilt by mavericks, men who knew\nhow alliances are made. That's not\nhow to organize and who were not\nhow friends are made,\" confided one\nafraid to raise hell in the political\nof Wurf's several enemies on the\narena.\ncouncil. \"He should keep that stuff\nWurf, 55, is the driving force be-\nwithin the family.\"\nhind the phenomenal growth of the\nAmerican Federation of State, Coun-\nHe has attacked the AFL-CIO's\nty and Municipal Employes. As the\nleader, George Meany, for using\nunion's president, Wurf may either\n\"draconian measures\" to keep the\nbe among the last of the old breed or\nAFL-CIO neutral during the 1972'\nthe precurser of a new generation of\npresidential bid of Sen. George\nlabor mavericks, depending upon\nMcGovern, and has also criticized\nTHE WASHINGTON STAR\nMarch 4, 1975\nOrganizing Illinois, a Case Study\nin Exercising Union Power\nmay happen soon in other state capi-\nBy John Fialka\nin from Washington by\ntals if one of the nation's fastest\nWashington Star Staff Writer\nAFSCME to direct the\ngrowing unions, the American Feder-\noperation.\nSPRINGFIELD, Ill.-This city, like\nation of State, County and Municipal\nmost capital cities, has long become\nEmployes (AFSCME) has its way.\nWilson, 42, like many\nAFSCME operatives, is a\ninured to the sound of people ranting\nWith 700,000 members and 1,000 a\ndisciple of the late Walter\nweek signing up, AFSCME ranks as\nReuther, former head of the\nSecond of Two Articles\none of the largest unions, in the na-\nUnited Auto Workers, and\ntion in terms of raw numbers. But its\nperhaps the last romantic\nstrength and influence are felt in\nfigure in the maturing U.S.\nand marching in the streets, trying to\nwider terms and, more and more, it\nlabor movement.\nsell one special interest or another to\ncan indeed be expected to have its\nFor Wilson, running a\nthe state legislature.\nway.\nunion is not a job, it is a\nLast fall a decidedly different\nWhile the growth has been phe-\nmission. And organizing is\ndemonstration took place. Prison\nnomenal, harnessing the growth into\nnot just another chore, it is\nguards from Joliet, mental health\nunions has never been easy. State\nmore like a cult, a thing to\nworkers from facilities in rural down-\nand local governments have always\nbe pursued relentlessly at\nstate areas, social workers from\nbeen shadow areas of the labor move\nwhatever cost.\nChicago's inner city and data proc-\nment, areas where there were\nIt is the potential that ex-\nessing clerks from the nearby squat,\nfew if any laws protecting the perqui-\ncites Wilson. \"There are\nglassy office buildings poured out of a\nsites of union power: collective bar-\nthousands and thousands of\nfleet of buses-some 2,000 strong.\ngaining, dues checkoff, the agency\nnew workers out there,\nThey were the people who run the\nshop and the right to strike.\nwaiting to be organized. It's\nbureaucratic machinery. They were\nIn some states where there are now\njust like the CIO in the\nabout to prove to the legislature that\nsuch laws, AFSCME has set up col-\nthirties,\" he exults.\nthey had become familiar with the\nlective bargaining anyway. The labor\nWilson automatically\nstate's political machinery as well.\ncontracts are de facto and the strikes\nthinks in terms attracting\nThe shouting, the marching, the\nthat sometimes lead up to them have\nthe press, holding demon-\nplacards, the packed galleries were\nlater been declared illegal.\nstrations, starting political\nreally icing on the cake. The home-\nThe union's activity in Illinois con-\naction, finding some\nwork had been done. Nearly every\nstitutes a significant case study in\ndramatic new issue that\nmember of the Illinois house of repre-\nthe development and expansion of\nwould galvanize the atten-\nsentatives had been buttonholed in\ntion of those about to be\nhis home district.\nlabor power in an inhospitable envi-\norganized.\nronment.\nBy the end of the day the House had\nIn some areas, as in\nvoted 124 to 5 to override the gover-\nThe turning point was the fulfilling\norganizing prison guards,\nof a campaign pledge in 1973 by the\nnor's veto blocking a bill to give each\nthe old issues had been\nvictor in the gubernatorial race, Dan\nof the state's 60,000- employes a\ndoing pretty well. Steve\nWalker, a Democrat. Walker signed\nthumping $100 a month pay raise.\nCulen, another former UAW\nan executive order making Illinois\nA few months ago, this would have\nmember, explains that sign-\nthe 17th state to allow state employes\nbeen only a dream. To think that one\ning up guards is not much\ncould marshal a politically-powered\nsome form of collective bargaining,\ndifferent than signing up\nunion out of the diverse, complacent,\nWalker had been backed by\nassembly line workers:\nAFSCME.\ngenerally conservative and some-\n\"You deal in the same\ntimes patronage-riddled ranks of\nbasic principle: The Boss is\nTHE SIGNING opened the way for\nstate employes here was, as one state\na sonofabitch. Right?\"\na full scale organizing campaign.\nlegislator put it, \"mind boggling.\"\nBut Wilson felt he had to\nTwo of the union's councils, a total of\ndo something more to reach\n15,000 workers, were merged into one\nBUT THE DREAM hit the streets\nthe huge army of clerks\nunit and Richard Wilson was brought\nwho often seemed to be im-\nhere on Nov. 20. And the same scene\nCongressional Record\nUnited States\nof America\nPROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE\n94th\nCONGRESS, FIRST SESSION\nVol. 121\nWASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MARCH 6, 1975\nNo. 36\nSenate\nThe Senate met at 12 noon and was\nThe ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-\nDepartment claimed yesterday that the\ncalled to order by Hon. GARY W. HART,\npore. Without objection, it is so ordered.\nAugust 1973 halt of U.S. bombing in\na Senator from the State of Color\nCambodia, which Congress ordered-and\nI did not vote for that particular pro-\nPRA'\nThe Chaplain, the\nL. R. Elson, D.D., O.\nprayer:\nHear the words\nProverbs:\nKeep thy heart\nfor out of it are t\nProverbs 4: 23.\no Lord, our God, k\nwith the divine spirit\nOn March 6, eight U.S. Senators, led by\nwork better for the N\nformer Salt Lake City mayor Jake Garn, held\ning kingdom. Amen.\na lengthy colloquy on proposed compulsory\npublic sector \"bargaining\" legislation. We\nAPPOINTMENT OF\nDENT PRO\nfeel their remarks deserve your attention,\nThe PRESIDING (\neven though the colloquy received little,\nwill please read a CO\nif any, media coverage. (See next page.)\nSenate from the Pr\n(Mr. EASTLAND).\nThe legislative clei\n-- Reed Larson\nletter:\nExecutive Vice President\nPRESIDE\nNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK\nWashington\nTo the Senate:\nCOMMITTEE\nBeing temporarily al\non official duties, I a\nHART, a Senator from\nto perform the duties i\nabsence.\nJAI\nPt\nMr. GARY W. HART thereupon took\nvents no a UNC\npuone uiseussion U1 Potroy\nthe chair as Acting President pro\nresumed the consideration of legislative\nsues relating to Indochina. And blames-\nbusiness.\ntempore.\nmanship will not help to build a coop-\nerative working relationship between\nAID TO CAMBODIA\nCongress and the executive branch on\nTHE JOURNAL\nforeign policy matters. The question is\nMr. MANSFIELD. Mr. President, on\nMr. MANSFIELD. Mr. President, I ask\nnot who lost Cambodia, if the present\nFebruary 25, in a letter to the Speaker\nunanimous consent that the reading of\ngovernment falls, but who got us into\nof the House, the President said that \"an\nthe Journal of the proceedings of\nCambodia, for what purpose and what\nindependent Cambodia cannot survive\"\nWednesday, March 5, 1975, be dispensed\nits cost in men, money, refugees, and\nwithout the supplemental aid he re-\nwith.\ndestruction has been.\nquested and posed the question: \"Are we\nThe ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-\nto deliberately abandon a small country\npore. Without objection, it is so ordered.\nin the midst of its life and death\nORDER OF BUSINESS\nstruggle?\" The day before, Assistant Sec-\nCOMMITTEE MEETINGS DURING.\nretary of State Philip Habib told a Sen-\nThe ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-\nSENATE SESSION\nate Foreign Relations Subcommittee that\npore. Under the previous order. the Chair\nonly if the aid requested was provided\nrecognizes the Senator from Michigan.\nMr. MANSFIELD. Mr. President, I ask\ncan \"that nation survive.\" Now Secretary\n(The remarks made by Mr. GRIFFIN\nunanimous consent that all committees\nHabib has made a \"summary of negoti-\nat this point appear in today's RECORD\nmay be authorized to meet during the\nating efforts on Cambodia\" available to\nunder Statements on Introduced Bills\nsession of the Senate today.\nthe Congress and the media. The State\nand Joint Resolutions.)\nS 3181\nMarch 6, 1975\nCONGRESSIONAL RECOR\n3182\nCONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE\nMarch 6, 1975\nemployees, compulsory arbitration and\nare rights inuring to each cit\nORDER OF BUSINESS\nof any of the sovereign functions and\ncent years in Philadelphia, Baltimore,\nthe role of individual freedom in an or-\nzens have the right to associate\npowers of government to a private, inde-\nAlbuquerque and dozens of other major\nderly society.\nadvocate their special interest\nThe ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-\npendent organization not subject to pub-\ncities.\nThis discussion will also define the dis-\nernment. It is something ent\npore. Under the previous order, the Sen-\nto grant any one interest group\nlic control and rarely subject to public\nFurther, the majority of economists\ntinctions between the public sector and\nator from Utah is recognized for not to\nand access to the decision-maki\nscrutiny?\nrecognize the power of labor unions to\nthe private sector. The public and the\nexceed 15 minutes.\nThe answer can be found in the enor-\nforce up wages and costs year after year\nprivate sectors are as different as night\nIt is our hope that the disc\nMr. GARN. Mr. President, I ask unani-\nmous growth of employment in Federal,\nwithout corresponding advances in pro-\nand day. And, a fundamental problem\nwill generate a serious nat\nmous consent that a member of my staff,\nState, and local governments. The Bu-\nductivity. This monopoly element, as we\nlies in the fact that private sector models\nabout compulsory public-sec\nDaniel Wall, may have the privilege of\nreau of Labor Statistics estimates that\nhave recently seen first hand, is a prime\nare being applied to the public sector\ning laws and governmental S\nthe floor during the colloquy this\npublic employment has grown faster\ncause of inflation.\nwhere they are not appropriate. By defi-\nwould like to suggest that tl\nmorning.\nthan any other sector of the economy.\nMoreover, it is widespread knowledge\nnition collective bargaining suggests a\npeople and their representa\nThe ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-\nThere are now some 14 million govern-\nthat many candidates and elected offi-\nparity of powers which is essential to the\nhard look at the validity\no\npore. Without objection, it is so ordered.\nment workers-three million Federal em-\ncials have depended on contributions\nbargaining process. In the public sector\nthat sanctions compulsory\nployees and 11 million State, county, and\nfrom labor organizations. Many newly\nthis parity is nonexistent. Management\nfor one, intend to introduc\nGOVERNMENTAL SOVEREIGNTY OR\nmunicipal employees-and their number\nelected Members of Congress are in-\nin the private sector is granted a greater\nto protect this country agair\nCOMPULSORY PUBLIC SECTOR\nis growing by leaps and bounds. Public\ndebted to organized labor for their finan-\ndegree of economic leverage than its\nadoption of compulsory publi\nBARGAINING\nemployment unions, having discovered\ncial backing that helped them win elec-\ncounterpart in the public sector. Because\ngaining laws, and I urge m\nthat government unionism holds the\ntions. All unions including public em-\nof market restraints, it is possible for an\nto support it.\nMr. GARN. Mr. President, in a letter\nmost lucrative potential of all, are the\nployee unions are out for political con-\nemployee of private industry to negotiate\nI want to make it clear th\nto L. L. Stewart, president of the Na-\nfastest growing and best organized labor\ntrol. Yet, the implications of political\nhimself out of a job. However, because\nopposed to voluntary unior\ntional Federation of Federal Employees,\nunions in the country. From 1951 to 1972,\npower in the hands of the public sector\ngovernment supplies essential services\nright of individual public\ne\nPresident Franklin Roosevelt said:\ngovernment work forces grew by 151 per-\nare far more threatening than for other\nfor the public, it is not possible for him\norganize and join unions if t1\nmilitant tactics have no place in the\ncent, payrolls by 596 percent, union mem-\nunions.\nto \"lock out\" the employees or go out of\nBut I am a great believer in\nfunctions of any organization of government\nbership by 130 percent, and strikes by\nAnd of course there is the funda-\nbusiness.\nfree people to decide wheth\nemployees. A strike of public employees\npublic employees by 1,000 percent. And,\nmental question of whether employees\nThe most fundamental question we\nto do that or not. I am also\nmanifests nothing less than an intent on\nI might add that one need not be a\nshould be forced to relinquish their bar-\nwill address in this dialog is whether\nliever in the right of the Sta\ntheir part to obstruct the operation of gov-\nernment until their demands are satisfied.\nPhiladelphia lawyer to realize the cost of\ngaining rights to unions which they do\ngovernment sovereignty can survive in\nwhether they shall have\nSuch action, looking toward the paralysis of\nthese strikes to the taxpayer both in\nnot want.\nthe wake of compulsory public-sector\nunionism or not.\ngovernment by those who have sworn to\nterms of higher taxes and in terms of\nContrary to the evidence, a wide range\nbargaining. Noted law professor Dr. Syl-\nI am not proposing or\nsupport it, is unthinkable and intolerable.\ndisruption to the community.\nof proposals will be presented for our\nvester Petro states:\npropose national right-to\nFor 200 years Americans have recog-\nTherefore, it is hardly unexpected\nconsideration based on the hypothesis\nThere is an absolute and ineradicable in-\nThere are only 14 States tha\nnized and fought for the representative,\nthat Americans have begun to take a\nthat compulsory collective bargaining for\ncompatibility between government sovereign-\nthat is their right, to make su\nordered, and sovereign government that\ncloser look and active interest in labor\ngovernment employees \"safeguards the\nty and compulsory public-sector bargain-\non their own. They should\nrelations of State, local, and Federal\npublic interest and contributes to the\ning, an incompatibility which must neces-\ndated by the Senate or by\nPresident Roosevelt stood for in his\nstatement. Yet forces are mounting\nGovernments. And, as a result, several\neffective conduct of public business.\"\nsarily weaken if not ultimately destroy ef-\nefforts to oppose their will\nfective governing power and the integrity of\nwhich threaten this Government and the\nStates and legislatures have passed leg-\nDespite the profound differences between\nlocal governments of this C\ngovernment vis a vis the general citizenry,\nelements which support it. I refer to the\nislation governing labor relations of pub-\nthe public and private sectors, there are\nformer mayor, I could not\nsince the necessary consequence of according\ndrive to carry compulsory bargaining\nlic employees. What have we reaped from\nthose who approve extension to the pub-\npublic-employee unions exclusive bargaining\nintrusion into my ability\neven deeper into the public sector. The\nthis activity? Where has it left us and\nlic sector of the same kind of compulsory\nstatus is to encourage among government\nadministrative officer of a\no\nwhere will it take us?\ncollective bargaining legislation which\nemployees a tendency to repose their loyal-\nsuch decisions, and be held\nbattle cry has reached Capitol Hill, and\nas all of us in Congress know, a serious\nLegislators have usually been persuad-\nhas been operative in the private sector\nties primarily in the units which they have\nto the citizens of my city for\ned to adopt the \"orderly process\" of\nfor some 40 years.\nbeen induced to believe are their protago-\nsions.\nlegislative drive will soon be underway to\nnists.\nThe ACTING PRESIDEN\nenact compulsory bargaining laws-laws\ncollective bargaining from the private\nWhen the Federal Government sanc-\nthat any objective analysis will show to\nsector. The enactment of such laws are\ntion was given to exclusive union repre-\nObviously, what we need asked and\npore. The Senator's 15 m\nbe violently incompatible with a sover-\nusually justified in the name of peace and\nanswered is whether the government-\nexpired.\nsentation and compulsory unionism in\neign, responsible government.\ntranquility. Union supporters assure the\nby its nature, a monopoly and the pro-\nMr. GARN. I ask unanim\nprivate employment for private industry\nThe key ingredients we will doubtless\npublic employee/employer conjugal bliss\nin 1935-through the National Labor\ntector of all citizens' rights and liberties,\nthat Elizabeth Yee be accord\nsee in forthcoming public sector collec-\nand reduced \"industrial strife.\" Yet the\nRelations Act-it thereby extended to a\nhas the authority legally or morally, to\nleges of the floor during th\ntive bargaining legislation are:\nfacts support the contrary.\nprivate organization-a union-the pow-\ntransfer any of its functions to a private,\nof the discussion on this sub\nThe ACTING PRESIDEN\nFirst. Federal imposition of compul-\nVirtually every \"solution\" has created\ner of government.\nindependent organization. When public\npore. Without objection, it is\nsory public sector bargaining on all gov-\nmore unionization problems than have\nBut several public employee legislative\nofficials acting under authority granted\nbeen solved. Conflicts, unrest and illegal\nto them by other public officials, give un-\nUnder the previous order,\nernments-in other words, the law would\nproposals would go far beyond NLRA.\nstrikes continue to mount. Moreover, the\nBills suggested by the American Federa-\nion organizers the right to say who will\nfrom South Carolina is re\nforce a sovereign government to negoti-\nate as an equal with a private organiza-\nconcessions employees are not able to\ntion of State, County, and Municipal Em-\nperform public service and how those\nnot to exceed 15 minutes.\ntion-in this case, a labor union.\nget at the bargaining table they fre-\nployees and the National Education As-\nservices will be performed, do not we\nMr. THURMOND. Mr. P1\nquently try to get from the legislatures.\nsociation would force a wide aggregation\nhave a situation in which the authority\ncolleagues here today will\nSecond. Monopoly bargaining privi-\nleges-that is, individual public em-\nThe solutions, for the most part, often\nof union power and special privilege on\nof government has been divested from\nquestion of whether the Fede\nployees would be compelled to accept un-\ndo nothing more than merely add to the\nevery government unit in the country\nthe public?\nment should impose upon th\ntheir political subdivisions\nwanted union officials as their \"exclusive\npower and privileges of union organizers,\noutside of the Federal Government.\nUnwelcome as it may be in many quar-\ncompulsory public sector co\nrepresentatives\" in dealing with their\nThe prohibition of public employees\nAmong a long list of special privileges\nters, and unrealistic as it may seem in\ngaining. More broadly, we\nown government employer.\nfrom striking is based on a sound premise\nthese proposals would: grant monopoly\nothers, the proper labor relations policy\nsidering whether it is in\nThird. Compulsory membership where\nwhich recognizes their unique position\nstatus to a union without secret ballot\nfor any government might well be one\npublic interest and is sound\nall public employees, including those who\nand potential ability to paralyze the com-\nelections, authorize strikes of public em-\nwhich rejects collective bargaining in\nfor any government to be\no\ndo not want the alleged \"services\" of the\nmunity by a strike action. However, the\nployees, permit union officials to engage\nevery form.\nrecognize and bargain with\nunion, will have to join or pay money to\nrecord shows that officials of public em-\nin coercive acts, authorize and approve\nLast September, the U.S. District Court\nI believe that in considera\nthe union-or lose their right to work for\nployee unions openly flout laws which\nfull compulsory union membership and\nfor the Middle District of North Caro-\nissue, we must pay careful\ntheir own government.\nstand as obstacles to their quest to take\nobligate every State, political subdivi-\nlina held constitutional a State law\nthe question of the effect\nIt is my purpose and that of several of\nover control of public services-openly\nsion, town, city, county, borough, district,\nwhich declared contracts between gov-\nsystem of compulsory barga\nmy colleagues to take a careful look today\nflout them and then brag about their\nschool board, board of regents, public or\nernment and unions in that State to be\nat a wide range of legislative proposals\nillegal actions. Seldom has this resulted\nquasi-public corporation or any other en-\nhave on the sovereignty of\nvoid. In its decision the Court said:\nIn this area, I would like\ncovering public employees. We contend\nin any significant legal penalty, however,\ntity which is tax supported to abide by\nto the extent that public employees\nthat these proposals, if enacted, will se-\nbecause of fear on the part of public\nits provisions and to obey the decisions of\nsider what sovereignty\ngain power through recognition and collec-\nwhether it can exist where\nverely damage the public interest. Our\nofficials that strong punishment will be\na national public employment relations\ntive bargaining, other interest groups with\nquality of life will be diminished through\ncommission.\nis forced to submit itself and\nmet with even more intensive retaliation.\na right to a voice in the running of the\nthe wanton disregard of the individual\nIn New York City a few years ago, offi-\nToday's discussion will look into all\ngovernment may be left out of vital political\nmaking processes to the\ncials of public employee unions convinc-\naspects of these various legislative pro-\ndecisions. Thus, the granting of collective\ntable. I hope that at the co\nrights of millions of Americans. And, the\nfree spirit of democracy will be crushed\ningly proved that they can put a major\nbargaining rights to public employees in-\nthese remarks, it will be o\nposals as well as the development of a\nvolves important matters fundamental to\nthat governmental sovereig\nby those who seek to compromise it.\nU.S. metropolis out of business whenever\nnew spoils system through public em-\nour democratic form of government. The set-\nsolutely essential and that\nWhat has led us to the point where we\nthey choose to do so. What happened in\nployee political action, the rights of State\nting of goals and making policy decisions\ncan actually seriously discuss the transfer\nNew York City has also happened in re-\nand municipal governments and their\nmetrically opposed to any sys\n3184\nCONGRESSIONAL\nMarch 6, 1975\nMarch 6, 1975\nCONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE\nment\nthe right to refrain is just as basic\nstand what is happening. They are the\nposite and would take th\nto employ and keep in our employment\neverything in our power to resist any\nMayors to heel-with or without a law-\nand precious as the right to join, and the\nones that have made the decisions as to\ning the summer. So it en\nraised new doubts that the general welfare\nthe very best employees. In order to do\nattempts to institute a system of com-\nCommission supports this position.\nwould benefit from a Federal mandate to\nwhat to be done in their particular\nance our work force.\npulsory public sector collective bargain-\nSome authorities contend that State legis-\nthis, we must keep ever mindful that the\nstrengthen civil service unions.\nStates, particular localities.\nloved it. As I said, it was\ntotal compensation of our employees and\ning at any level of Government. I do not\nlation should not include language that gives\nMr. President, I think it would be\n85 percent of the empl\ndoubt for a moment that the future of\nOn November 11 the New York Daily\nemployees the option of not joining an em-\ntheir working conditions must be com-\nployee organization. They point out that the\nhighly irresponsible for us to take an\nwork in that manner. It\nparable with those in the private sec-\nour system of government depends on it.\nNews editorialized as follows:\nStates should not mandate the \"choice\" pro-\naction that is contrary to their best in-\npayers some money.\nThe ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-\nThe 94th Congress must screw up its\ntor.\nvision since it would preclude employer and\nterest.\nNow, because Congress\nNow we come to the last and most\npore. Under. the previous order, the Sen-\ncourage and take a firm stand against such\nreckless labor adventuring. Government\nemployee representatives from negotiating\nI yield the floor, Mr. President.\nfluence of the national\ncrucial difference between public and pri-\nator from Arizona is recognized for not\nworkers are entitled to representation and\nunion and closed shop agreements. The pref-\nThe ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-\ntions, has decided to ig\nvate employment. That is the very nature\nto exceed 15 minutes.\nbargaining. But strikes against the public\nerable approach, according to this argument\npore. Under the previous order, the Sen-\nmayors and Governors\nof Government itself. The ruling prin-\nshould be taboo-period. And that goes also\nis for the State laws to remain silent on this\nUNIONIZATION OF FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, AND\nator from Nevada is recognized for not\nbecause I do not suppo\nciple of action in the private sector is\nfor compulsory union membership. We simply\nmatter, thereby providing a greater degree\nMUNICIPAL EMPOLYEES\nto exceed 15 minutes.\nmuch political power,\ncannot afford these callous, indefensible\nof flexibility for public agencies and em-\nfree contract. That is, every action that\nMr. FANNIN. Mr. President, I com-\nthreats to the health, safety and economy\nployee organizations to arrive at agreements\nMr. McCLURE. Mr. President, I ask\nthose rules and said th\ntakes place between free individuals in a\nmend my colleagues, the Senator from\ntailored to fit their own special circum-\nunanimous consent that the time allotted\ngrant compensatory time\nof the nation Nor should civil service workers\nfree society is done by mutual agree-\nSouth Carolina and the very able and\nstances.\nto the Senator from Nevada under the\ngrant it during the wee\nbe compelled to pay tribute to unions to hold\nment. This is true in employment, in\ndistinguished Senator from Utah; the\nThe Commission believes these contentions\njobs won on merit.\nspecial order be allotted to the Senator\novertime was incurred,\npurchase, in all of our obligations. How-\nSenator from South Carolina, who served\nignore the fact that in the public service\nfrom Utah (Mr. GARN).\nweek, or you have to pa\never, the ruling principle of action in\nMr. President, I think that illustrates\nthe right to join an employee organization\nwith distinction as Governor, and who\nThe ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-\ntime and a half.\nexactly what we are discussing today.\nmust be accompanied by the right not to\nGovernment is force. Government is\nhas great knowledge in the field which\npore. Without objection, it is so ordered.\nThat is an imposition\nThese people are proud public serv-\njoin. When the right to join becomes a duty,\ngovernment only because it and it alone\nhe is discussing, and who has worked with\nobviously freedom of choice becomes merely\nMr. GARN. Mr. President, I wish to\nmillion dollars of cost on\nhas the power to rule by compulsion.\nthe employees both at the State and the\nants. They want to hold their jobs on\nthe basis of their merit, their work, they\na\ncatchword.\namplify my previous remarks with some\ngovernment.\nThis is the way it must be because only\nlocal levels. I am very pleased to follow\nThe union shop and the closed shop may\nspecific examples of the effect of laws\nCongress in their great\nthrough compulsion can Government\nwant to go forward, they want to earn\nhim in discussing this subject, so impor-\nor may not be appropriate for various crafts\npassed by Congress that are not nearly\nrevenue sharing. Salt La\ninsure the ordered, peaceful society upon\ntant to all the people of America, and\na right to go forward.\nand trade portions of private industry. But\nas severe as the matter we are condemn-\n$4 million in revenue sl\nwhich all other segments of society de-\nMr. President, today public employees\nmy colleague from Utah, the former\ngiven the size of many governmental juris-\ning today, that being mandatory collec-\nof the imposition of\nt\nin 34 of the 50 States are shielded from\ndictions and agencies the diversity of em-\npend for their existence.\nmayor of Salt Lake City, that great city\ntive bargaining and binding arbitration,\nStandards Act, Congress\ncompulsory unionism by constitutional\nployee skills, and the intense competition\nThis is the crux of the question, can\nand the effect these laws have had on the\nthat stands as a symbol of good govern-\nmillion of it away. But me\nprovisions, laws and executive orders.\nbetween and among public employee orga-\nany government exist as government\nment in this country of ours, and who\nThose States are Alabama, Arizona,\nnizations, this arrangement is wholly un-\ncities and States of this country. I refer\nit has taken away the rig\nonce it has lost its sovereignty Further-\nperformed admirably as its mayor, and\nArkansas, California, Connecticut, Dela-\nsuitable in the public service.\nspecifically to the imposition of the Fair\nmayor and a city counci\nmore, can any government retain\nwho is now a U.S. Senator. We are proud\nLabor Standards Act upon municipal and\nsions in their own comn\nsovereignty when it must submit im-\nware, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas,\nA similar view of impropriety of com-\nthat we have him with us, with his knowl-\nState and county governments of this\nown sovereign communit\nportant decisions of public policy to col-\nLouisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi,\npulsory unionism in the Federal serv-\nedge of the affairs of municipalities that\ncountry last year, despite the position of\naccountable to the voter\nlective-bargaining negotiations with\nMissouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hamp-\nice was expressed 13 years ago by then-\nthe National League of Cities Board of\nmunity for their actions.\nhas proven to be very helpful to us,\nshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New\nSecretary of Labor Arthur Goldberg. He\nhaving had recent experience in these\nDirectors representing 15,000 cities across\ngiveth and they taketh a\nunions?\nThe answers to these questions are\nYork, North Carolina, North Dakota,\nspoke out in defense of prohibition\nparticular fields, because we are in a\nthis country, despite the fact that the\nnet of a half million doll\nsimple and clear, because of the very\nOhio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode\nagainst the union shop and the closed\nperiod of changing times, some better\nGovernors' Conference took a similar po-\nWell, we were ignoreo\nnature of unions and collective bargain-\nIsland, South Carolina, South Dakota,\nshop in Executive Order 10988, issued\nand some otherwise. However, we know\nsition in opposition to the Congress of\nlistened to by the Con\nTexas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, and\nby the late President John F. Kennedy\ning.\nthat there are different issues that face\nthe United States imposing the Fair\ngroup of labor leaders\nA collective-bargaining relationship-\nWyoming.\nto authorize collective bargaining in the\nLabor Standards Act and the provisions\nmore effect on the outco\nour municipalities today than, perhaps,\nMr. President, the people of these\nFederal service.\nany and every collective bargaining re-\nwhen some of us served in our particular\nof it on local government, despite the\nposition of the Fair Labo\nStates have afforded their friends and\nlationship-depends on establishing an\nAddressing members of the American\nfact that we testified opposed to it-\nthan the representative\nStates several years ago.\nadversary relationship between em-\nneighbors that work for their govern-\nFederation of Government Employees,\nMr. President, Congress is now con-\nMayor Tom Bradley of Los Angeles and\ncities in this country. S\nployer and employee. Unions, in order\nments this protection that is so vital to\nSecretary Goldberg said:\nI, he being a Democrat, I being a Re-\ntake it to court. We did,\nfronted by demands from union spokes-\nto win and hold the loyalty of their\ntheir State and the future of their par-\nI know you will agree with me that the\npublican-despite the fact that the Na-\nceived an injuction, a re\nmen to sanction the forced unionization\nmembers, must demand more than the\nticular communities, and certainly vital\nunion shop and closed shop are inappro-\nof the 14½ million individuals employed\ntional League of Cities Board of Direc-\nfrom the imposition of\nto this great Nation of ours.\npriate to the Federal government. And be-\nemployer is willing to offer. If a union\ntors representing 15,000 cities, both lib-\ngoing to find out wheth\nby the States, local jurisdictions, and the\nObviously, the safeguards now en-\ncause of this, there is a larger responsibility\nwere to accept only what the employer\nfor enlightment on the part of the govern-\nerals and conservatives, Republicans and\nof the United States ha\nFederal Government. These incredible\noffered, it would serve no useful purpose\njoyed by civil servants in those States\ndemands were dramatized last Novem-\nwould be eliminated by a new Federal law\nment union. In your own organization you\nDemocrats, came back and testified be-\ntional right to impose tl\nfor its members and soon it would have\nber 6 by the first meeting of the AFL-\nhave to win acceptance by your own conduct,\nfore House and Senate committees in\nlocally elected officials of\nno members. So unions by virtue of their\nauthorizing the forced unionization of\nCIO's new Public Employees Department.\nyour own action, your own wisdom, your own\nopposition, so that a very united bipar-\nThe Governors Confer\ncitizens employed by the States and their\nvery nature and to preserve their ex-\nThat meeting was featured by an address\nresponsibility, and your own achieve-\ntisan, nonpartisan effort opposed this,\ning the National League\nistence, must make demands. The only\npolitical subdivisions.\nments so you have an opportunity to\nnevertheless it was imposed upon the\nU.S. Conference of Mayo\nby the labor federation's president,\ninstrument that unions have at their dis-\nMr. President, the erection of barriers\nbring into your organization people who\ncities of this country at a tremendous\nI wish to add that I ho\nGeorge Meany, who said:\nagainst involuntary union membership\ncome in because they want to come in and\nposal to support their demands is the\ncost to the taxpayers of this country. I\npeople will wake up to\nCertainly, it's against the law to strike the\nin the public sector was strongly recom-\nwho will participate, therefore, in the full\nwithdrawal of the services of their mem-\ncivil service, but it's AFL-CIO policy to ig-\nactivity of your organization.\nuse my own city as an example.\ndone, to demonstrate th\nbers-the strike. The strike is, even when\nmended by the Advisory Commission on\nIt will require us to pay time and a\nsome people in the labo\nnore those laws.\nIntergovernmental Relations. In March\nit is peaceful, the use of force. It can-\nNow, Mr. President, that was Secre-\nhalf to firemen for sleeping. There will\nimpose their will, despite\nNow, just imagine that.\n1970, that distinguished bipartisan body\nnot be defined or construed any other\ntary Goldberg addressing this Govern-\nbe no additional firemen, no better qual-\nthe elected representativ\nway. No government can call itself\nMr. President, I was appalled by the\npublished its recommendations dealing\nment employees' organization, so this\nity of fire service, and just in my rela-\ntry.\nsovereign if it permits the use of force\nirresponsibility of that statement.\nwith employer-employee relations in the\nis not a partisan issue, this an issue\ntively small city a cost of $3 million a\nI wish to report to the\nto enforce demands against it. We can\nMr. Meany advised our 14½ million\npublic sector.\nof righteousness, this is an issue of\nyear to the local taxpayers for nothing.\ning held this week with\nsee from this that there can be no true\ncivil servants to \"quit working for the\nMr. President, it is advantageous for us\nfreedom.\nThere is an additional half million dol-\nsional Cities Conference\ncollective bargaining without strikes and\nguy who's kicking you around.\" Is that\nto recall that this Commission was\nSignificantly, the ban on forced union-\nlars because of rules that are involved\nCollective Bargaining\nthere can be no true government with\nnot a fine way to address these people?\ncreated by the Congress in 1959. Its mem-\nism in the Federal service has been\nwith telling us how to run our personnel\n1975, 2 p.m. to 4:30 p.m\nYou stop the job. You shut it down. You\nbers represent the general public and the\nmaintained by President Kennedy's\nmanagement system.\nnational Ballroom Eas\nstrikes.\nThis is the essential question we must\ntake the consequences, and you fight. And if\nlegislative and executive branches of\nthree successors. A similar prohibition\nI will put in a specific example here.\nHilton Hotel, Washingto\nthe guy happens to be the mayor of a city\nFederal, State, and local governments.\nface. Are we to have sovereign govern-\nwas incorporated by the Congress in the\nor the governor of a state, it doesn't make\nMost people know that in Salt Lake City\nI refer to a memorar\nThe Commission overseees the operation\nment, or are we to have public sector\nPostal Reorganization Act of 1970.\nyou have very distinct seasons. You have\nto me from Commiss\na damn bit of difference.\ncollective bargaining? We cannot have\nof our federal system with its division of\nMr. President, if we permit ourselves to\nhard winters and warm summers. So our\nPhillips, Jr., of Salt Lake\nboth. I am confident that the vast ma-\nThat is the end of the quote, that par-\npowers, and it submits carefully studied\nbe stampeded on the issue of authorizing\npark department employees would work\nThis concerns the Cong\njority of the American people will agree\nticular quote. I think that is a shameful\nrecommendations relating to improve-\ninvoluntary unionism in the public sec-\na lot of overtime on the parks and golf\nshop on Collective Barga\nquote.\nment of the system.\ntor, exposing 14½ million public em-\ncourses during the summer and build up\ning the League of Citie\nwith this position.\nFor us, my colleagues, the question is\nIt was reassuring to note that Mr.\nIn their 1970 report members of the\nployees to union coercion, then the\novertime, I might add this was on a vol-\nthe Washington Hilton\nequally simple. We must decide whether\nMeany was censured on the editorial\nAdvisory Commission on Intergovern-\nAmerican people will recognize clearly\nuntary basis. They enjoyed taking that\nPresent were: Robert\nwe as the elected representatives of the\npage of the New York Times. That news-\nmental Relations declared:\nthat the Congress merits their contempt.\ncompensatory time off in the middle of\nor, Tulsa, presiding; Rol\npeople are going to continue to run our\npaper is influential. I do not always agree\nWhile recognition of the right to mem-\nMr. President, we should listen to the\nthe winter when they were not needed.\neral Counsel, House Su\nGovernment, or whether we are going to\nwith it, but it observed in its edition of\nbership is fundamental, of equal importance\nvoice of the American people. We should\nThey would take 5 or 6 weeks off at a\nLabor of the House Com\nturn it over to a relative handful of pro-\nNovember 10:\nis the principle that no public employee\ntake the actions by the people that are\ntime and enjoy the long periods. The\ncation and Labor; and\nThe accent Mr. Meany chose to put on\nshould be required or coerced into joining\nfessional union organizers.\nclose to the scene of activity, to under-\nmilitant action to bring Governors and\nan organization as a condition of employ-\nsnow removal crews would do the op-\nAssociate Counsel, Senat\nI am firmly convinced that we must do\n3186\nCONGRESSIONAL\nMarch 6, 1975\nMarch 6, 1975\nCONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SE\nLabor and Public Welfare, representing\njor concern has to be the question of\n\"hypocritical\" those who believe strikes\nWe, as legislators, have a responsibil-\nMr. President, I find it disturbing\nity to our constituents to see that public\nread predictions in the newspapers th\nDonald Elisburg.\nstrikes.\ncan be prevented through the enactment\nI want the arrogance of this statement\nThe undesirability of public sector\nof legislation which obligates govern-\nsafety is maintained and that Govern-\nthis Congress will soon enact what is d\nstrikes and the reasons for this are obvi-\nment to bargain with unions.\nment services continue uninterrupted. To\nscribed as \"a new Federal law grantir\nto be carefully noted in the RECORD:\nous to all of us. One needs only to look\nfulfill this responsibility, we must oppose\ncollective bargaining rights\" to the mo\nLabor leaders have echoed this and,\nIn the introductory remarks, both Mr.\nas their actions demonstrate, have shown\nthe injection of compulsory public sec-\nthan 11 million employees of the N\nMoss and Mr. Sape advised those present\nat the havoc wrought by these strikes-\nthat regardless of what the Supreme Court's\na total lack of regard for the law and\ntor collective bargaining into our society.\ntion's States, counties, cities and towr\nsuch as those in San Francisco and Bal-\nDuring the current session numero\ndecision was on the suit brought by the\nsociety by engaging in illegal strikes.\nSUMMARY\ntimore-to realize their danger.\nbills have been introduced here for t)\nLeague of Cities contesting the right of Con-\nIn Baltimore-police, prison guards,\nGeorge Meany, speaking at the founding\nFaced with increasing union demands\npurpose of mandating collective bargai\ngress to interfere with the employment prac-\nand sanitation workers on strike at the\nconvention of the AFL-CIO's new Public\nfor compulsory public sector collective\ning at all levels of government. Su\ntices of the cities and counties of this coun-\nsame time. The result: Garbage piled in\nEmployee Department, said:\nbargaining, a major concern has to be\ntry, it was their opinion that Congress would\nlegislation was submitted to the 93d Co\nmove ahead to impose such regulations on\nthe streets; individuals attempting to\nIf you just quit working for the guy who's\nthe question of public sector strikes.\ngress and to several of its predecesso:\ntake their own garbage to the dumps\nkicking you around. And if that guy happens\nthe cities and counties.\nThe undesirability of public sector\nBut somehow, we are seeing stea\nAfter questions by those present, Mr. Moss\nharassed and physically threatened by\nto be the mayor of the city or the Governor\nstrikes and the reasons for this are ob-\ngenerated behind them.\nand Mr. Sape stated Congress could very\nstrikers, in one instance fired upon-an\nof a State, it doesn't make a damn bit of\nvious.\ndifference.\nI recognize that this legislation h\nwell make collective bargaining and the right\nuprising of inmates at the city prison\nWe have been unable to prevent them.\nbeen the subject of public hearings co\nto strike a condition of getting a federal\nsubdued only with the assistance of non-\nActual experience with public sector\nExperts on labor relations and union\nducted by committees and subcommitte\ngrant.\nrebellious inmates-looting and arson\ncollective bargaining further verifies\nleaders have declared them unavoidable.\nof the Senate and House of Represent\nThat is really something, when em-\nerupt within hours after the police walk\nthis. The State of Michigan, for exam-\nActual experience has echoed this. Strike\ntives.\nployees of the Senate and the House of\noff the job, resulting in millions of dol-\nple, enacted public sector bargaining\nbans and penalties have been ineffectual.\nIt would be a grave mistake, in n\nRepresentatives of the United States are\nlars of property damage and at least one\nlegislation in 1965. In the 7 years prior\nThe reason for public sector strikes is\nview, for the Federal Government to a\ntelling mayors of this country that even\ndeath. And the national president of the\nto this, they had experienced one strike.\npublic sector collective bargaining. The\ntempt to dictate to the States and the\nif we win a suit in the Supreme Court\nunion threatens Governor Mandel that\nIn the 3 years that immediately followed,\nrational course is to oppose compulsory\npolitical subdivisions with respect\nof the United States declaring the very\nBaltimore City would burn to the ground\nthere were 103 illegal strikes. In fact, a\npublic sector collective bargaining.\ntheir own employees.\nact of the Congress to be unconstitu-\nunless their demands were met.\nstatistical compilation of all States\nMr. President, I was very much in-\nIf a given State bargains, or refus\ntional, that Congress will go ahead and\nIn San Francisco-the city crippled by\nshows an average of 1.92 strikes per\nterested in the observations of the dis-\nto bargain, with its own civil servan\nstuff it down our throats anyway.\na massive strike of its employees. Public\nState per year before the enactment of\ntinguished junior Senator from Utah.\nthat is the State's business and not t\nMr. Moss and Mr. Sape were extremely\ntransportation shut down-schools ex-\ncompulsory collective-bargaining legisla-\nHere is a man who has had firsthand ex-\nbusiness of the Federal Government.\narrogant and in essence said that we\nperiencing 25 percent attendance and on\ntion and 6.58 strikes per State per year\nperience in the managing of a great city.\nIf a given State grants monopoly ba\ncould do nothing to stop it and had just\na half-day schedule-San Francisco\nthereafter.\nHe is a man who knows what he is talk-\ngaining privileges to labor unions con\nas well sit back, relax, and enjoy it.\nGeneral Hospital operating on an emer-\nLet me repeat those figures: The aver-\ning about. He is a man who has experi-\nprised of its own employees, or withhol\nI submit that it is time the American\ngency-only basis, all but 150 critically ill\nage statistical compilation of all States\nenced firsthand what some of the laws\nsuch privileges, that is the State's bus\npeople awakened to what is being im-\npatients moved to other locations-over\nprior to the enactment of this legislation\nthat are passed by Congress can do to a\nness and not the business of the Feder\nposed upon them. If they want to have\n100 million gallons of raw sewage a day\nwas 1.92, and after the enactment of\ncity in America. I am a believer in the\nGovernment.\nGovernment close to the people, if they\nbeing pumped into the bay. After the\ncompulsory collective-bargaining legisla-\nright of people to join unions. I am well\nIf a given State either prohibits\nwant their local mayor and city council,\nsettlement, a local labor leader tells the\ntion, that figure rose to 6.58 per State\naware, as every interested American must\nsanctions the mandatory unionization\ncounty commissioners, Governors, and\nstrikers:\nper year thereafter.\nbe that unions have moved the standard\nState workers who do not want to\nlegislators able to be anything but local\nI want to compliment you on the way you\nLegislated strike bans have proven in-\nof living and the welfare of workers for-\nrepresented by labor unions, that al\nstooges for the Federal Government, then\nmounted your picket lines-the way you kept\neffectual, as have penalties for illegal\nward in a very marked fashion in this\nis the State's business and not the bu\nwe cannot tolerate further extension of\nthis city in turmoil until our demands were\nstrikes. The vast majority of public\ncountry in the last 100 years.\nness of the Federal Government.\nthe power of the Federal Government\nmet.\nsector strikes have been and continue to\nI think the words of the distinguished\nIf a given State decides to permit er\ninto the internal affairs of local and\nOne would think that something real-\nbe illegal. The penalties against both the\njunior Senator from Utah and others\nployees of the State and its political su\nState government. We cannot tolerate a\nly terrific had been accomplished, with-\nunion and the individuals striking have\nhere today who have talked on this sub-\ndivisions to engage in strikes, that, to\nbill that imposes mandatory collective\nout ever giving a thought to the havoc\nrarely been enforced, even in those\nject ought to be listened to by every\nis the State's business and not the bu\nbargaining and binding arbitration on\nand the pain and suffering that resulted\nStates where the law has been written\nMember of this body. They ought to be\nness of the Federal Government.\nthe cities and counties of this country.\nSO as to make these penalties automatic\nread by every Member of the other body,\nfrom this illegal strike.\nSeveral proposals now pending in\nWe need to work to repeal the imposi-\nand mandatory. Prime among the rea-\nand before we pass legislation that guar-\nThe scene has been repeated arcoss\nCongress would compel all of the\ntion of the Fair Labor Standards Act\nsons for this has been the tendency to\nantees public employees the right to\nthe country: a firemen's strike in Albu-\nStates and their political subdivisions\nwhich interferes with the sovereign right\ninclude in the \"negotiated\" settlement\nstrike, we had better see what we are\nquerque that resulted in residents at-\nof a mayor or a Governor to administer\ndoing. I hope that this Congress will act\nrecognize and bargain with unions p\nof a strike a clause granting amnesty to\ntempting to put out fires with garden\nporting to represent their employe\nthe affairs of his own city or State.\nthe strikers and their union.\nresponsibly in this area and not take a\nhoses; a prolonged teacher strike in Wis-\nThese proposals would also extend n\nThe simple fact is that collective bar-\nstep that, some say, would be a step for-\nI yield back the remainder of my time.\nconsin that led to deep divisions and out-\nnopoly bargaining privileges to rec\ngaining and strikes are inseparable. Pub-\nward, but, in fact, would be a very sad,\nThe ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-\nbreaks of violence within the community;\nnized unions. They would legalize\nlic sector unions are going to strike when\nstep backward for America.\npore. Under the previous order, the Sen-\na recent bus strike in Washington that,\nThis is a great country. The rights of\npractice of requiring workers on pub\nand where they feel like it.\nator from Wyoming is recognized for not\nas reported in the Washington Post, most\npayrolls to pay dues or fees to lal\nThe recent trend has been to give up\nindividuals are protected here as they are\nto exceed 15 minutes.\nadversely affected low-income individ-\nunions as a condition of employme\nthe fight altogether and legalize public\nnowhere else on Earth.\nMr. HANSEN. Mr. President, I have\nuals that relied on the buses to get jobs\nAnd the measures to which I refer wo\nsector strikes, much to the delight of the\nI yield the floor.\nconsistently supported efforts to require\nfar from their homes; a recent case in\nunions. The State of Pennsylvania un-\nMr. McCLURE. Mr. President.\nput the Federal Government's stamp-\nprivate sector unions to conduct a secret\nNew York City where the leadership of\ndertook such a course of action in 1971,\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr.\napproval on strikes by State, county,\na\nballot vote among their members before\nthe firefighter's union called a strike\nmunicipal employees-including put\nand in 1972 had the dubious honor of\nFORD). Under the previous order, the Sen-\ncalling a strike. I have also supported\nafter the membership had voted against\nschoolteachers.\nleading the Nation in the number of pub-\nator from Idaho (Mr. MCCLURE) is rec-\nefforts to require that each new offer\nit.\nlic sector strikes.\nognized for not to exceed 15 minutes.\nThe very fact that serious conside\nfrom management be voted on by the\nAs a rule, have we been able to prevent\nThe point being conveniently ignored\nMr. McCLURE. Mr. President, I ask\ntion is likely to be accorded-in fact\nmembership. I believe that these meas-\nthese work stoppages? Experience shows\nby the proponents of compulsory public\nunanimous consent that the order of ap-\nbeing accorded-these proposals ill\nures are necessary to instill the greatest\nthat we have not. Learned opinion holds\nsector collective bargaining is that pub-\npearance between Mr. BUCKLEY and my-\ntrates how far we have strayed from\namount of democracy into union affairs.\nthat under a system of compulsory public\nlic sector collective bargaining is the rea-\nself be reversed and that he be recognized\nprinciples which guided the Natio\nUnder this system, a strike could not be\nsector collective bargaining these strikes\nson for public sector strikes. This fact is\nat this time.\nFounding Fathers.\ncalled unless a majority of members de-\nare, in fact, unavoidable.\ninescapable. A union must satisfy its\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER. Without\nThe men who established our form\nsired it, and union leaders would not\nExperts in the field of labor relations\nmembership. To do this, that union must\nobjection, it is so ordered. The Senator\ngovernment sought to diffuse sovere\nbe allowed to reject management offers\nhave reached this conclusion. Theodore\nmake demands. This establishes the ad-\nfrom New York is recognized.\npower. George Washington said:\nwithout first consulting the member-\nH. Kheel, the well-known arbitrator, has\nversary relationship that unions thrive\nMr. BUCKLEY. I thank the distin-\nGovernment is like fire, a dangerous\nship. This would go a long way toward\nsaid that \"collective bargaining and\non. To maintain this adversary relation-\nguished Senator from Idaho.\nvant and a fearful master.\nplacing control of their own affairs back\nstrikes are like siamese twins.\" Robert\nship and insure the success of their de-\nMr. President, I wish to address, in my\nStudents of our country's history\nin the hands of the workers instead of a\nHillman, former labor commissioner for\nmands, the union must show a willing-\nremarks, one aspect of this discussion,\nremember that ratification by the Sta\nfew union leaders.\nthe city of Baltimore, at a conference on\nness to strike, for the strike is their\nnamely, whether or not the Federal Gov-\nof our Constitution was assured only\nMr. President, in the public sector we\npublic sector labor relations held this\nequalizer. The establishment of a will-\nernment has any authority or any right\nadoption of the first 10 amendments\nare faced with increasing union demands\npast December at the University of Mary-\ningness to strike necessitates actually\nto intervene in what is basically the busi-\nthat document. Throughout our natio\nfor a federally mandated system of\nland said, \"collective bargaining means\ngoing on strike when the situation de-\nness of the States and their political\nlife those amendments have been po\ncompulsory collective bargaining. A ma-\nstrikes.\" He further characterized as\nmands it.\nsubdivisions.\nlarly known as the \"Bill of Rights\"\n3188\nCONGRESSIONAL\nMarch 6, 1975\nMarch 6, 1975\nCONGRESSIONAL RECORD\nconducting a 1-year study of employer-\nEmployee Relations,\" and reads as\non this concept of government and the\nIt is important to stress here again\nunanimous consent that the orde\nemployee relations in the public sector.\nfollows:\ngoverned.\nthat government, by definition, is unique.\nthe quorum call be rescinded.\nIn unmistakable language, the Commis-\nThe United States Congress is considering\nYet, I am afraid, we have wandered far\nIt is a uniquely privileged and powerful\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER. W\nsion's report expressed vigorous opposi-\nlegislation which would provide to State and\nastray in the field of labor relations law;\nmonopoly, whose very existence is de-\nobjection, it is so ordered.\ntion to:\nlocal government employees the right to\nand, if we are careless in our actions to\nrived from the consent of the governed.\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER.\nAny Federal effort to mandate a collective\norganize and collectively bargain. This leg-\ncome, we might not only jeopardize the\nAs the distinguished scholar Russell\nthe previous order, the Chair wil\nbargaining, meet and confer, or any other\nislation would substantially replace indi-\nfreedoms we are supposed to protect, we\nKirk wrote last year in Education\nognize the Senator from North Ca\nlabor-relations system for the employees of\nvidual state laws and porcedures which now\nregulate these activities with a uniform fed-\nmight even jeopardize the Government\nmagazine:\n(Mr. HELMS)\nState and local jurisdictions or for any sector\neral law.\nitself.\nBy its nature, government is a monopoly.\nMr. HELMS. Mr. President,\nthereof. Little would be left of the Federal\nThe National Governors' Conference\nAs we have already noted, union pro-\nIn any community nowadays, ordinarily,\nunanimous consent that I will be al\nprinciple of divided powers were such legis-\nopposes federal intervention in this area. It\nfessionals are trying to build a case for\nthere exists but one police force, one fire de-\nto yield 2 minutes of my time to th\nlation enacted. No interpretation of the com-\nmerce power, of the State as proprietor, or of\nis the belief of the Nation's Governors that\nFederal legislation affecting labor rela-\npartment, one department of sanitation, one\ntinguished Senator from Nebrask:\nmatters relating to the employees of State\ntions in the public sector-in the Federal\npost office system one apparatus for the\nthe \"general welfare\" clause can, in our opin-\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER. W:\nand local governments are within the sole\ncollection of revenue and the disbursing of\nion, serve as a legitimate constitutional basis\nGovernment, as well as every State,\npublic funds.\nobjection, it is so ordered.\nfor this kind of drastic infringement upon\njurisdiction of these units and are not prop-\ncounty and borough across the country.\nerly the subject of federal legislation.\nIf the people employed in such a monopoly\nMr. CURTIS. I thank my distingu\nthe basic authority of the States and locali-\nties as governments in a federal system.\nThe National Governors' Conference, in\nThey will undoubtedly attempt to sell\nare subject to the will of officers in a union,\nfriend.\nadopting this statement, takes no position on\nthese proposals to us in the name of lib-\nin some emergency the authority of govern-\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER.\nMr. President, it is germane to observe\nthe principle of collective bargaining for\nerty and worker rights.\nment might be defied successfully by the\nChair might inform the Senator\nthat agencies of the Federal Government\npublic employees but states its firm commit-\nThey will discuss the right to join a\nmen who dominate the union.\nNorth Carolina that the quorum ca\nare not yet obligated by law to engage in\nment to the view that this is an area which\nunion-and it must be noted here that\nThen he warned, even the most essen-\ntaken from his time of 15 minutes\nbargaining with their employees. Under\nshould be left to the discretion of the several\nthat is a right already protected by the\ntial public services, including the ordi-\nMr. HELMS. Very well.\nStates.\nthe prevailing circumstances, imposition\nU.S. Constitution-and various other\nnary enforcement of law and keeping of\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER. The\nby the Congress of such an obligation on\nMr. President, I know it has become\nclaimed rights, such as the \"right\" of\nthe peace-\nator from Nebraska.\nthe States and their political subdivi-\nunfashionable in this body to suggest\nGovernment employees to strike against\nWould depend upon the mood and the am-\nMr. CURTIS. Mr. President, I W\nsions would be anomalous-not to say\nthat there are any constitutional limita-\ntheir Government.\nbitions of the people controlling the union.\njoin with the distinguished Senator\ngratuitous.\ntions remaining to Federal action. The\nBut they will ignore other rights,\nThe real government might be the union\nUtah and others in calling attent\ncourts have cooperated in a gradual ex-\nrights which may not seem too import-\nitself.\nThe failure or refusal of the Congress\nthe Senate the problems involved in\nto apply a labor relations law to its own\npansion of the commerce clause, so that\nant to them, but which in one way or an-\nHarsh words, but not unrealistic if we\nefforts for unionization of Govern\nagencies and departments and their em-\nit bears no conceivable relationship to\nother affect all of us. While it is true that\nfall into the trap of granting to public\nemployees at all levels of Governme\nployees was not overlooked by the Ad-\nwhat our founders intended, and the\neach person has a different focus and\nsector union officials monopoly control of\nWithin the last day or two, ther\nvisory Commission on Intergovernmental\nsame thing has been said about the gen-\nperspective on his own and the Nation's\nthe public sector workforce through the\nan account that appeared in the V\nRelations. Its report concluded:\neral welfare clause. And although each\nneeds, there are some insights common\nconcession of monopoly representation\nington Star concerning what has\nIn the absence of overwhelming evidence\none of us is sworn to defend the Consti-\nto all. Everyone will agree that the pro-\nprivileges and compulsory union shop\npened in the State of Illinois.\nof the unwillingness or inability of State and\ntution, I believe we ought to remind\ntection of his freedom is basic to all other\ntaxing powers, coupled with the right to\nI believe in the right of people t\nlocal governments to act, the Federal Gov-\nourselves once in a while as to what is\npropositions. Most people see that the\nstrike in those unions.\nthe union, I do not think that shou\nernment should refrain from preemptive ac-\nin the Constitution.\nbest way to protect their own freedom is\nIf we grant them monopoly status, we\ninterfered with. I do not believe\ntion. Such evidence clearly is lacking at\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER. The time\nto insist on the protection of freedom for\nhave, as Dr. Kirk has eloquently pointed\nprinciple of compulsory unionism\npresent. States and localities have developed\nof the Senator from New York has ex-\nothers.\nout, in effect, created a system of dual\nby coercion or by a matter of law.\nand are developing their own response to the\npired. Under the previous order, the Sen-\nFor many, the most precious freedom\ngovernments-one legitimate, appointed\nI also wish to point out that the\nchallenge of employee militancy, especially\nator from Idaho (Mr. MCCLURE) is\nteacher militancy. Given the nature of this\nof those guaranteed by the Constitution\nby the authority of the people, and the\ncertain essential services of Govern\nchallenge, experimentation and flexibility are\nrecognized.\nis that of religion. They insist that with-\nother a de facto government, account-\nwhich by their very nature call for\nneeded, not a standardized, Federal, pre-\nMr. McCLURE. Mr. President, let me\nout it any adherence to freedom in other\nable to no one except possibly the politi-\nstraint.\nemptive approach\nbegin by expressing my commendation\nforms is folly. Representatives of several\ncal system it feeds on.\nSo, whatever might be our att\nThe Federal Government clearly has an in-\nto those who have already spoken,\nreligious groups have come to me ex-\nThe citizen taxpayer, subject to abuse\ntoward strikes involving nongovern\nterest in the development of stable and\nparticularly to the freshman Senator\nplaining that compulsory unionism\nby both governments, could exercise\ntal activities, I am of the opinion t\nequitable labor-management relations at the\nfrom Utah (Mr. GARN), the former mayor\nwould force them to violate their relig-\nsome control over the one, but would be\nis not according to sound public\nother levels. This interest can be best served.\nof the great city of Salt Lake City, and\nious convictions. Because of this I offered\nvirtually powerless to control the\nthat these Government unions shou\nhowever, by avoiding actions that would ex-\nto the Senator from South Carolina (Mr.\nan amendment to the 1970 Postal Reor-\nmonopoly of the other.\nallowed to strike.\nacerbate these relations and by focusing on\nTHURMOND) for his comments, and also\nways and means of directly encouraging the\nganization Act providing that:\nAs union officials gain a bigger and\nWe will be faced with this proble\nto commend the additional comments by\nNo individual who is a member of a relig-\nmightier foothold, and are able to exer-\nreference to the postal service b\nestablishment of strong, innovative person-\nnel systems.\nthe Senators from Arizona, Wyoming,\nious sect or division thereof, the established\ncise more control over the selected gov-\nlong and I think it is important th\nand New York, who have just concluded.\nand traditional tenets or teachings of which\nernment, we could be faced with the\nlook at all of the problems involve\nThe Commission, whose members rep-\nMr. President, the nature of our dis-\noppose a requirement that a member of such\nactual day-to-day operation of vital gov-\nnot permit this to further deterior\nresent the public and the executive and\nsect or division join or financially support\ncussion here today brings to mind an\nernment services at the whimsy of a\nvery poorly administered and run 1\nlegislative branches of Federal, State and\nany labor organization as a condition of em-\nployment, if such individual pays to the\nunion bureaucracy.\nservice.\nenduring observation by the 17th cen-\nlocal governments, is a respected and\ntury philosopher, Baruch Spinoza, on\nGovernment is unique. Its function is\nIn saying that, I want to set the\npermanent bipartisan body. Among its\nTreasurer of the United States a sum equal\nthe role of government in a free society:\nto the initiation fees and periodic dues uni-\nto serve the cause of liberty. We cannot\nord straight, I am sure that ther\nmembers who fashioned the 1970 report\non employer-employee relations in the\nThe object of government is not to\nformly required as a condition of acquiring\nhave liberty and compulsory monopoly\njust countless honest and dedi\nchange men from rational beings into beasts\nand retaining membership in a labor orga-\nunions in control of the public service\npostal workers. Yet there is some\npublic sector were Senator MUSKIE of\nor puppets, but to enable them to develop\nnization which is representative of the em-\nworkforce, coupled with the right to\nwrong somewhere. Our Postal Se\nMaine, former Senator Ervin of North\ntheir minds and bodies in security, and to\nployee unless said individual and said labor\nstrike. The measure of any proposition\ncontinues to deteriorate.\nCarolina, the late Senator Karl E. Mundt\nemploy their reason unshackled in fact,\norganization mutually agree upon some\nmust be its impact upon a free people.\nI want to again commend the d\nof South Dakota, Congressman ULLMAN\nthe true aim of government is liberty.\nother condition of employment.\nIt would be ironic if we were to move\nguished Senator from Utah for t\nof Oregon, Congressman FOUNTAIN of\nThis philosophy quickly found its way\nThis amendment was accepted by the\ninto the bicentennial period by inaugu-\nthe lead in promoting thought on\nNorth Carolina, and the former Con-\ninto our own national law and discourse.\nHouse Committee on Post Office and\nrating a program so alien to all that our\nimportant subject.\ngresswoman from New Jersey, Mrs. Flor-\nIt is not a long step from Spinoza's\nCivil Service. Although the section to\nFounding Fathers fought for.\nI thank my distinguished friend\nence P. Dwyer.\nideal government to the Declaration of\nwhich it was amended was ultimately\nMr. President, I yield back the remain-\nNorth Carolina.\nMr. President, I appeal to my col-\nremoved from the bill for very different\nder of my time.\nI yield back the remainder of my\nleagues to heed the Commission's recom-\nIndependence, in which the Founding\nreasons, Congress made it clear that it\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER. Under\nNORTH CAROLINA'S SOLUTION\nmendation. We are bound by our oaths\nFathers wrote:\ndid not intend to undermine religious be-\nthe previous order, the Senator from\nto reject all legislation designed to com-\nThat all men are created equal, that\nMr. HELMS. Mr. President, we\nthey are endowed by their Creator with cer-\nliefs. It seems to me that those people\nNorth Carolina (Mr. HELMS) is recog-\njust heard it from our colleagues-\npel the States and localities to bargain\ntain unalienable Rights, that among these\nwho profess to believe in the separation\nnized.\nthe threat to the basic political in\nwith labor unions purporting to repre-\nare Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Hap-\nof church and state ought to be in the\nMr. MANSFIELD. Mr. President, I\ntions of the country posed by the\nsent their employees.\npiness-That to secure these Rights, Gov-\nforefront of this fight to prevent an in-\nsuggest the absence of a quorum on the\npulsory public-sector bargaining\nI might add, Mr. President, that only\nernments are instituted among Men, deriving\ncursion by the state into what is for\ntime of the Senator from North Carolina.\nposals being offered for our consi\n2 weeks ago, at the National Governors'\ntheir just Powers from the Consent of the\nsome a religious matter. This will give\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk\ntion.\nConference, the Committee on Executive\nGoverned.\nthose people a chance to show that what\nwill call the roll.\nWe have discussed here today, in\nManagement and Fiscal Affairs adopted\nOur society, our Constitution, and\nthey really believe in is a separation of\nThe assistant legislative clerk pro-\nticular what compulsory public S\nthe following resolution, which I shall\nsupposedly every law and statute enacted\nchurch and state-not a separation of\nceeded to call the roll.\nbargaining on all levels of Govern\nread in its entirety. It is headed \"Public\nby Congress in the past 200 years is built\nchurch and people.\nMr. McCLURE. Mr. President, I ask\nby Federal legislators would mean.\n3190\nCONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE\nMarch 6, 1975\nunion power in North Carolina. Yet it has\nworking and value, and I ask unanimous\nIn the instant case, plaintiffs request in-\nMarch 6, 1975\nCONGRESSI\nnot led to continuous struggles with\nconsent that the decision be printed in\njunctive and declaratory relief against the\npublic employee disputes and conflict.\nthe RECORD.\nstatute on the grounds that it operates to\nter into contracts with them. The Constitu-\nThe Stat\nAnd the statute has withstood challenges\nThere being no objection, the decision\nviolate their rights of freedom of associ-\ntion does not mandate that anyone, either\nchosen not\nation guaranteed by the First Amendment\nthe government or private parties, be com-\ntracts with\nin the courts.\nwas ordered to be printed in the RECORD,\nof the United States Constitution and of\npelled to talk to or contract with an orga-\nThat polic\nIn a September 1974 decision the U.S.\nas follows:\nequal protection and due process guaranteed\nnization. What Judge Craven wrote in Atkins,\nlightly, or\nDistrict Court for the middle district of\n[No. C-286-WS-72]\nby the Fourteenth Amendment. Jurisdiction\nsupra, at 1077, is controlling and bears re-\nanimus. T1\nNorth Carolina held constitutional this\nIN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE\nis premised upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 1343\npeating:\npublic emp\nNorth Carolina law which declares in-\nDISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, WINSTON-\nand 42 U.S.C. $ 1983. A three-judge court\n\"We find nothing unconstitutional in G.S.\ngaining W:\nvalid any contracts between a sovereign\nSALEM DIVISION\nhas been properly convened pursuant to 28\n95-98. It simply voids contracts between\ngreater int\nU.S.C. 2281 and 2284.\ngovernment and a union in that State.\nunits of government within North Carolina\nsociation c\nWinston-Salem/Forsyth County Unit of the\nThe court said, that-\nNorth Carolina Association of Educators,\nPlaintiff Winston-Salem/Forsyth County\nand labor unions and expresses the public\nfessor Sylv\nUnit of the North Carolina Association of\npolicy of North Carolina to be against such\nCompulsor\nTo the extent that public employees gain\nan unincorported association, and Jac-\nEducators is an unincorporated labor asso-\nqueline A. Ballentine, individually and on\ncollective barganing contracts. There is noth-\nWake Fore\npower through recognition and collective bar-\nciation representing professional employees,\ning in the United States Constitution which\nthoroughly\ngaining, other interest groups with a right\nbehalf of other similarly situated teachers\nincluding teachers and administrators. The\nentitles one to have a contract with another\nrecognition\nto a voice in the running of the government\nin the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County\nindividual plaintiff is a teacher in Forsyth\nwho does not want it. It is but a step further\nnizations\nmay be left out of vital political decisions.\nSchool System, Plaintiffs, v. A. Craig Phil-\nCounty and a member of the association. She\nto hold that the state may lawfully forbid\nin an artic\nThus, the granting of collective bargain-\nlips, State Superintendent of Public In-\nwishes to represent- all teachers in the\nsuch contracts with its instrumentalities.\nposition, P\ning rights to public employees involves im-\nstruction; Frank Crane, Commissioner of\nWinston-Salem/Forsyth County School Sys-\nThe solution, if there be one, from the view-\nous probler\nportant matters fundamental to our demo-\nLabor for the State of North Carolina; Rob-\ntem. The defendants are State officials, the\npoint of the firemen, is that labor unions\nlective barg\ncratic form of government. The setting of\nert B. Morgan, Attorney General of the\nWinston-Salem/Forsyth County School\nmay someday persuade state government of\navoided if\ngoals and making policy decisions are rights\nState of North Carolina; and John C. Kiger,\nBoard, the Forsyth County Board of Com-\nthe asserted value of collective bargaining\nSee Summe\ninuring to each citizen. All citizens have the\nOmeda Brewer, Eunice Burge, Richard\nmissioners, and the County of Forsyth.\nagreements, but this is a political matter and\nA Political\nright to associate in groups to advocate their\nJaneway, Mary Lauerman, William F.\nThe discontinuation of a salary supple-\ndoes not yield to judicial solution. The right\n1156 (1974\nspecial interests to the government. It is\nMaready, Alan R. Perry, Carol G. Thomp-\nment plan in 1972 supplied the irritant\nto a collective bargaining agreement, so firm-\ntive bargai\nsomething entirely different to grant any one\nson, As Members of the Winston-Salem/\nwhich caused plaintiffs to bring this action.\nly entrenched in American labor-manage-\nof the poli\ninterest group special status and access to\nForsyth County School Board, and the\nIn 1967, the school officials proposed the plan\nment relations, rests upon national legisla-\nsuch it car\nthe decision-making process.\nWinston-Salem/Forsyth County School\nwhereby the teachers in the Winston-Salem/\ntion and not upon the federal Constitution.\nlective bar\nBoard, and David W. Darr, Henry L. Crotts,\nForsyth County school district would receive\nThe State is within the powers reserved to it\nWhile he\nSimply put, the court made a very\nG. P. Swisher, Dr. W. L. Thompson, Jr., and\na portion of a school tax as part of their\nto refuse to enter into such agreements and\npublic sect\naffirmative statement of the rights of all\nLeonard Warner as Members of the For-\nsalary supplement. Since the supplement was\nso to declare by statute.\"\na chance t\ncitizens and groups of citizens to have\nsyth County Board of Commissioners, and\ntied to a county tax, it would increase along\nThe other cases considering the problem\nsion in disc\nequal access to their own Government.\nthe County of Forsyth, Defendants\nwith the tax base of the county. The school\nraised here have likewise rejected plaintiffs'\nmental bod\nWhile the North Carolina law puts a\nBefore Craven, Circuit Judge, Gordon,\nboard approved the plan. In 1972, the County\nargument. Newport News F.F.A. Loc. 794 V.\npermitting\nstatutory prohibition on recognition and\nChief Judge, and Ward, District Judge.\nCommissioners terminated the plan when\nCity of Newport News, Va., 339 F. Supp. 13\ngaining mi\nArgued July 12, 1974, decided Septem-\ncontract-making, it does not preclude\nthey adopted the final budget for the county.\n(E.D. Va. 1972); Hanover Tp. Fed. of Teach.\nof power be\nber 17, 1974.\nPlaintiffs admit that no one source can be\nL. 1954 V. Hanover Com. Sch. Corp., 457 F.2d\nstances, of\nrepresentatives of employee associations\nWilliam G. Pfefferkorn of Winston-Salem,\nblamed for the discontinuation of the plan.\n456 (7th Cir. 1972). While the First Amend-\nto effective\nfrom petitioning their government over\nNorth Carolina, for the plaintiff.\nThey say that the determination of local\nment may protect the right of plaintiffs to\ning situati\nconditions in the workplace. What it does\nEdwin M. Speas, Jr., Assistant Attorney\nschool salaries results from input by the\nassociate and advocate, not all of their as-\nthe public\npreclude is government granting monop-\nGeneral, North Carolina Department of Jus-\nState Board of Education and the local units\nsociational activities have the protection of\nrecognition\noly status to a particular union, trading\ntice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for defendants\ncomposed of the school board and county\nthat amendment. The State is not required\ninterest gr\naway its own sovereignty, and depriving\nA. Craig Phillips, Frank Crane, and Robert\ncommissioners. Plaintiffs suggest that one of\nto provide plaintiffs with a special forum in\nthe runnin\nB. Morgan; William F. Womble, Jr., of Wom-\nthe reasons for the termination of the salary\norder to advocate their views. It is under no\nout of vit\nindividual workers of their precious lib-\nble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-\nsupplement was the discovery of the statute,\nduty to provide a \"guarantee that a speech\ngranting O\nerty to deal with their own government.\nSalem, North Carolina, for Winston-Salem/\nN.C.G.S. 95-98, by the governmental officials\nwill persuade or that advocacy will be ef-\npublic emp\nA strict nonrecognition policy, such as\nForsyth County School Board; and P. Eu-\nbetween 1967 and 1969. Plaintiffs claim that\nfective.\" Hanover Tp. Fed. of Teach. L. 1954\nfundament\nexists in North Carolina, would prevent\ngene Price, Jr., County Attorney, Winston-\nupon this discovery, the school officials be-\nV. Hanover Com. Sch. Corp., supra, at 461.\nernment. T\nany compromise of necessary government\nSalem, North Carolina, for Forsyth County\ncame increasingly intransigent in their dis-\nPlaintiffs' reliance on Healy v. James, 408\npolicy deci\nsovereignty.\nBoard of Commissioners, and the County of\ncussions with the teachers' association. They\nU.E. 169, 92 S.Ct. 2338, 33 L.Ed.2d 266 (1972),\ncitizen. All\nSecond, as the court Sep-\nForsyth.\nwould like to blame a drop in their mem-\nin support of the request for reconsideration\nate in grou\ntember, it would keep the channels of\nOPINION OF THE COURT\nbership to their claimed growing ineffective-\nof Atkins is misplaced. Healy concerned a col-\ncial interes\nness in discussions with the school officials\nredress open to all employees-not just\nWard, District Judge:\nlege's denial of recognition to a student\nthing entir\nafter the purported discovery of N.C.G.S. 95-\nThis case presents a renewed attack on\ngroup. The Court held that the nonrecogni-\ninterest gre\nto a monopoly bargaining organization.\n98.\nNorth Carolina General Statute 95-98 which\ntion abridged the student group's First\nthe decisio\nThird, it would allow government ad-\nIn this case, there never was a signed con-\nAmendment rights. The college had denied\nSummers n\nministrators to create and conduct re-\nprovides that contracts between state gov-\ntract between the teachers' organization and\nsponsible, humane, and effective public\nernmental units and public employee labor\nthe group a formal meeting place, and the\n\"In the\nthe school board. Defendants suggest that\nuse of college bulletin boards and the col-\nagree at th\nemployee personnel policies-a responsi-\norganizations shall be void.¹ Previously, in\nplaintiffs lack standing because there is no\nlege newspaper. Significantly, it had granted\nsubjects of\nAtkins v. City of Charlotte, 296 F. Supp.\nbility which, when subject to adversary\ncontract which is rendered void by N.C.G.S.\n1068 (W.D.N.C. 1969), a three-judge court\nthose rights to other student groups. The\nployee unio\n95-98. We agree that the plantiffs never\ncourt noted that \"the group's possible ability\nthe same f\ncollective bargaining, is less imaginative,\nupheld the constitutionality of that statute\nhad a contract or agreement with the school.\nto exist outside the campus community does\ncisions show\nand less progressive.\nwhile declaring related sections to be uncon-\nHowever, we read that fact as the basis of\nThe attention of government admin-\nstitutional.2\nnot ameliorate significantly the disabilities\npolitical pr\ntheir complaint. They say that the school\nimposed by the President's action.\" (408 U.S.\nin a specia\nistrators would thereby be focused-as it\nrefuses to enter into a contract with them,\n1 N.C.G.S. 95-98 reads as follows:\nat 183, 33 LdEd.2d at 280). Thus the restric-\nprerogative\nshould be-on dealing effectively. with\nor even engage in meaningful discussion, be-\ntion in Healy, supra, directly affected the stu-\nbut the cit\n\"Contracts between units of government\nthe employees and their interests, rather\ncause of the statute. Viewed in this light,\ndent group's right of advocacy and ability to\nernmental\nand labor unions, trade unions or labor or-\nthan dealing with the union and its\nthe question before this court is not moot\nganizations concerning public employees de-\norganize in a situation where the college had\naway by an\nand plaintiffs have standing to litigate the\ninterests.\nclared to be illegal.-Any agreement, or con-\ngranted those rights to other groups. In the\n\"In legal\nissue.\npresent case the statute we are concerned\nthe private\nAmong the most important considera-\ntract, between the governing authority of\nPlaintiffs allege that the statute is un-\nany city, town, county, or other municipal-\nwith does not differentiate between public\ntions, however, is the fact that nonrec-\nconstitutional because of the detrimental\nity, or between any agency, unit, or instru-\nemployee labor associations, nor does it re-\nconcerning\nognition would prevent the abuses of\neffect it has on their ability to associate in a\nstrict in any material way the ability to\na teacher W\nmentality thereof, or between any agency,\nhuman liberty which has been created by\nlabor organization. They contend the statute\ninstrumentality, or institution of the State\norganize.\nshould ge\nrenders nugatory their right to associate\nat 434:\nthe National Labor Relations Act's \"ex-\nof North Carolina, and any labor union, trade\nsince it voids any contract obtained by the\nIn Healy, supra, the college's action ma-\n\"Whateve\nclusive recognition\" and compulsory\nunion, or labor organization, as bargaining\nassociation. Thus, they say, it becomes fruit-\nterially and discriminatorily affected the stu-\nit dealt wit\nunionism policies.\nagent for any public employees of such city,\nless for the organization to discuss matters\ndent group's right to speak and advocate.\nbody is un\ntown, county or other municipality, or agency\nHere the statute has no such effect. All that\nThe North Carolina experience seems\nwith the school, and the individual teachers\nfrom statut\nit does is to render void contracts between\nto be a good place to start. It shows that\nor instrumentality of government, is hereby\nin turn become disenchanted with their or-\nthe labor association and the State. As stated\nlabor repres\ndeclared to be against the public policy of\nthe States can handle the problem on\nganization.\nwas no occa\nthe State, illegal, unlawful, void and of no\npreviously, the First Amendment does not\ntheir own without Federal intervention. I\nAccepting those consequences as true, we\nthe court\ndi\neffect.\"\ncannot accept the premise that plaintiffs'\nguarantee that an organization's advocacy\nthis case, th\ncommend this law to my colleagues as\nThe statutes declared unconstitutional in\nalleged right of association requires that\nwill be effective; it only protects the right to\ninterfere W\nthe way to go in the States which they\nAtkins, supra, were N.C.G.S. 95-97, which\nspeak.³\nstate governmental units negotiate and en-\nthink and\nrepresent.\nprohibited fire fighting employees of a gov-\nning of tim\nernmental unit from becoming members of\nbargaining as one of its purposes, and\nIn Aurora Ed. Ass'n E. v. Board of Ed.,\ndifferent fro\nMr. President, the decision of the U.S.\nor from assisting a labor organization which\nN.C.G.S. 95-99, which provided a criminal\nEtc., Kane County, Ill., 490 F.2d 431 (7th\nseek to use\ndistrict court on the North Carolina\nwas affiliated with a national or interna-\npenalty for violation of the related sections\nCir. 1973), the court distinguished Hanover\nunion in as\nlaw, provides further insights into its\ntionl labor organization that had collective\nof the chapter.\nTp. Fed. of Teach L. 1954 v. Hanover Com.\n\"The Open\nSch. Corp., supra, from the issue before it\nCal.L.Rev. 3\nS 3192\nCONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE\nMarch 6, 1975\nDavid W. Darr, Henry L. Crotts, G. P.\neconomy, and the Arab boycott lists are\npractice of commerce as it has flourished in\nSwisher, Dr. W. L. Thompson, Jr., and\nnow backed up with massive economic\nthis country\";\nLeonard Warner as Members of the For-\nleverage. So it is an entirely new situa-\nWhereas the Export Administration Act of\nsyth County Board of Commissioners, and\n1969 declares \"it is the policy of the United\ntion, Mr. President, and I do not think\nthe County of Forsyth, Defendants\nStates to oppose restrictive trade prac-\nwe can afford to silently acquiesce to\ntices or boycotts fostered or imposed by for-\nORDER\nthese discriminatory tactics.\neign countries against other countries\nFor the reasons set forth in an Opinion of\nI was gratified by President Ford's\nfriendly to the United States\nand\nthe Court entered contemporaneously here-\nstrong reaction to this situation last\nWhereas acquiescence, by individuals, in-\nwith,\nIt is ordered that the relief requested by\nweek, and I commend him for it. But I\nstitutions, or nations, to such discrimi.iation\nthe plaintiffs in the prayer for relief be and\nthink we in the Senate also have a re-\nundermines international commerce and the\nthe same hereby is denied, and the action is\nsponsibility to face this issue, and to put\nfundamental rights of every American citi-\nzen: Now, therefore, be it\ndismissed.\nthe world on notice that the full force of\nResolved, That it is the sense of the Senate\nFor the Court:\nthis Government's influence will be used\nthat-\nHIRAM H. WARD,\nto unter discriminatory demands. If\n(1) Discrimination in international çom-\nU.S. District Judge.\naccept these economic strong-arm\nmerce against individuals or institutions on\nSEPTEMBER 17, 1974.\ntactics today, I predict we will face an\nreligious, racial, or ethnic grounds must not\nThe PRESIDING OFFICER. Under th\nuglier choice next month or next year-\nbe tolerated, and all Americans are urged not\nand the stakes wil be higher then.\nto cooperate in any way with such discrim-\nprevious order, the Senator from Perh-\ninatory practices.\nsylvania (Mr. SCHWEIKER) is nized\nThe Senate can make two responses to\n(2) Every individual or institution ap-\nfor not to exceed 15 minutes.\nblacklisting tactics, Mr. President: We\nproached to participate in any such discrim-\ncan condemn these tactics uncondition-\ninatory practice shoud be required to make\nally and urge individuals and institu-\na full report of such action to the appro-\nSENATE RESOLUTION 100SUB-\ntions to resist them, and we can prepare\npriate agency of the United States Govern-\nMISSION OF A RESOLUTION RE-\ndetailed legislative countermeasures.\nment. which should make this information a\nLATING TO DISCRIMINATION IN\nThe resolution we introduce today ac-\nmatter of public record.\nINTERNATIONAL COMMERCE\n(3) Appropriate agencies of the United\ncomplishes the former objective, and I\nStates Government should discourage such\n(Referred to the Committee on Com-\nhope the Senate moves promptly to con-\ndiscriminatory practices and review all forms\nmerce.)\nsider legislation in this area.\nof Government support, subsidy, or assist-\nMr. SCHWEIKER. Mr. President, on\nToday's resolution does not push us\nance to American companies which acquiesce\nbehalf of myself and Senator WILLIAMS,\ninto any precipitous action in the Mid-\nin such discrimination.\nand Senators ALLEN, BAYH, BEALL, BENT-\ndle East, and it allows sufficient flexibil-\n(4) The United States Government should\nSEN, CASE, CLARK, CRANSTON, DOMENICI,\nity so current diplomatic efforts are not\nexamine its relationships with countries\nwhich practice such discrimination, and the\nFONG, GARN, PHILIP A. HART, HARTKE,\nimpeded.\nPresident should advise the Congress as to\nHUMPHREY, LEAHY, MATHIAS, McGEE, Mc-\nBut it also suggest very clearly cer-\nany justification for continuing any foreign\nGOVERN, MONDALE, Moss, MUSKIE, NEL-\ntain legislative approaches which might\naid, sales of defense articles or services\nSON, PACKWOOD, PROXMIRE, RIBICOFF,\nbe considered if these tactics continue.\n(whether for cash or by credit, guarantee, or\nROTH, HUGH SCOTT, STAFFORD, STONE,\nFirst, individual Americans-and Ameri-\nany other means) or other assistance pro-\nTUNNEY, and WEICKER, I submit today a\ncan institutions-must be encouraged to\ngrams for the benefit of any country prac-\nsay \"no\" to discriminatory demands. One\nticing such discrimination.\nsense of the Senate resolution con-\nSEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall\ndemning blacklisting in international\nway to accomplish this is to insure that\ntransmit a copy of this resolution to the\ntrade.\nthose who take discriminatory actions\nPresident of the United States.\nIn recent weeks, it has become clear\nto obtain approval from the blacklisters\nthat Arab investors are using their vast\nimmediately forfeit all U.S. Government\nMr. SCHWEIKER. Mr. President, I\neconomic leverage to dictate the ethnic\nassistance from such agencies as the\nyield 5 minutes of my time to the dis-\ntinguished Senator from Florida (Mr.\ncomposition of international business in-\nCommerce Department, the Export-Im-\nstitutions. Two of Britain's most pres-\nport Bank and the Overseas Private In-\nSTONE), who is one of the sponsors of\ntigious investment banking houses N M\nvestment Corporation. This would give\nmy resolution.\nRothschild & Sons and\nCo., were excluded fr\nbond issue at the requ\nArab Foreign Bank an\neign Trading, Contrac\nment Co. Lazard Frer\nbanking institution ass\nard of Manhattan, wa\n$25 million bond issue\na company funded by E\nLebanon. And apparel\nU.S. companies have I\nthe Arab boycott list,\nhave even tried to ne\noff.\nThe' standard apolo\ning are that companie\ncannot be denied the 1\nwho they will do bu\nanyway, the Arabs h:\nboycott list for years. ]\nourselves, Mr. Presider\nFor additional copies and information write:\nnot simply a business\nTHE NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE\nmore. It is now an\nweapon, deployed to (\n8316 Arlington Boulevard\ncomposition of inter\nFAIRFAX, VIRGINIA 22030\nfirms.\nAnd while the Arabs\ntaining boycott lists fc\ncountries were never a\nket-until the oil mone\ndenly the Arab countr\nas the only flourishing\nM02, M03, M07, Mo8, Mll, M13, M14, K01, K02, Ko3\nReported\nUnion Campaign\nContributions\nto Members of\nThe House Education\nand Labor Committee\n94th Congress\nSERALD FORD\nResearch findings of the\nNational Right to Work Committee,\nMarch 1975.\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nREPORTED UNION CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON\nMichael Blouin\nActive Ballot Club\nEDUCATION AND LABOR, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 94TH CONGRESS\n(D-lowa)\n1775 K Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/1/74\n500.00\nSource: Clerk of the House\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher\n*Michael Blouin (D-lowa)\n$36,900 4\nWorkmen Comm on Pol. Ed.\n*Paul Simon (D-III.)\n$34,400\n4\n2800 Sheridan Road\nJohn Dent (D-Pa.)\n$29,275\n2,3,4\nChicago, IL 60657\n10/26/74\n100.00\n*Robert Cornell (D-Wis.)\n$29,175\n4\nFrank Thompson (D-N.J.)\n$26,300\n2,3,4\nCarpenters' Legislative Improv. Comm.\n*Ron Mottl (D-Ohio)\n$23,830\n4\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nLloyd Meeds (D-Wash.)\n$22,550\n2,4\nWashington, DC 20001\n10/10/74\n500.00\nPeter Peyser (R-N.Y.)\n$21,555\n4\nWilliam Clay (D-Mo.)\n$18,850\n2,3,4\nInt'l Union of Operating Engineers\nJohn Brademas (D-Ind.)\n$18,700\n2,4\nEngineers PAC\n*Ted Risenhoover (D-Ok.)\n$18,600\n4\n1125 17th St., N.W.\nWilliam Lehman (D-Fla.)\n$18,550 5\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/26/74\n250.00\n*Leo Zeferetti (D-N.Y.)\n$15,062\n4\nJames O'Hara (D-Mich.)\n$14,300\n2,4\nlowa State Council of Machinists & Aerospace\nPhillip Burton (D-Cal.)\n$13,050\n2,4\nWorkers - Voluntary Political Fund\nDominick Daniels (D-N.J.)\n$12,550\n2,3,4\n2000 Walker\n*George Miller (D-Cal.)\n$12,000 4\nDes Moines, lowa 50317\n10/31/74\n200.00\n*Tim Hall (D-III.)\n$11,150\n1,4\nWilliam Ford (D-Mich.)\n$10,650\n2,3,5\nLaborer's Political League\nMario Biaggi (D-N.Y.)\n$ 7,400\n2,3,4\n905 16th St., N.W.\nJoseph Gaydos (D-Pa.)\n$ 6,450\n2,4\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/31/74\n250.00\nIke Andrews (D-N.C.)\n$ 6,250\n*Edward Beard (D-R.I.)\n$ 5,350\n1,4\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nPatsy Mink (D-Hawaii)\n$ 3,560 2\nGeneral Fund\nRonald Sarasin (R-Conn.)\n$ 2,350\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\n10/28/74\n500.00\nShirley Chisholm (D-N.Y.)\n$ 2,125\n2,3,4\nWashington, DC 20036\n11/2/74\n1,000.00\nAI Quie (R-Minn.)\n$ 2,000\nAlphonzo Bell (R-Cal.)\n$ 1,900\nMarine Engineer Beneficial Assoc.\nMarvin Esch (R-M inn.)\n$ 1,900\nPolitical Action Account\nAugustus Hawkins (D-Cal.)\n$ 1,400 2\n17 Battery Place\nJohn Ashbrook (R-Ohio)\n$ 500\nNew York, NY 10004\n10/30/74\n1,000.00\n*Bill Goodling (R-Pa.)\n$ 500\nCarl Perkins (D-Ky.)\n$ 500\n2,3,4\nNational Education Assoc. PAC\nJohn Buchanan (R-Ala.)\nNone\n1201 16th St., N.W.\n10/30/74\n500.00\nJohn Erlenborn (R-III.)\nNone\nWashington, DC 20036\n11/1/74\n500.00\nEdwin Eshelman R-Pa.)\nNone\n*James Jeffords (R-Vt.)\nNone\nSheetmetal Workers PAL\n*Larry Pressler (R-S.D.)\nNone\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\n*Virginia Smith (R-Neb.)\nNone\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/19/74\n400.00\nTOTAL $429,632\nTransportation Political Ed. League\n* First term Congressman elected in 1974.\n14600 Detroit Ave.,\n1 Public statements indicate support of compulsory unionism in public sector.\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n10/28/74\n200.00\n2 Voted in 1970 against the Right to Work provision in the Postal Reorganization Act.\n3 Has sponsored legislation which would compel federal, U.S. postal service, or state, county and local\nUnited Assoc. of Journeymen & Apprentices\ngovernment employees to support unions in order to work for their own government.\nof the Plumbing & Pipefitting Indus.\n4 Received ten percent or more of total campaign contributions from union sources.\n901 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.\n5 Total campaign contributions not available on March 1, 1975.\nWashington, DC 20001\n10/31/74\n300.00\nUnited Auto Workers - CAP\n8000 E. Jefferson\nDetroit, MI 48214\n11/5/74\n500.00\n1\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nMichael Blouin\nUnited Steelworkers of America PAF\nMichael Blouin\nInt'l Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers\n(cont'd)\n5 Gateway Center\nPittsburgh, PA 15222\n10/30/74\n2,000.00\n(cont'd)\nPolitical League\n200 Maryland Ave., N.E.\nWashington, DC 20002\n9/27/74\n100.00\nVoluntary Fund-Indus. Union Dept.\n815 16th St., N.W.\nILGWU - Campaign Comm.\nWashington, DC\nillegible\n500.00\n1710 Broadway\nNew York, NY 10019\n9/11/74\n250.00\nPolitical Action League\nSheet Metal Workers Int'l Assoc.\nIronworkers Political Action League\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20061\nillegible\n200.00\nWashington, DC 20005\n10/3/74\n500.00\nTempo Fund-Amer. Federation of Musicians\nJDC-PACE (Jones, Dubuque & Clayton\n641 Lexington Ave.\nCounties)\nNew York, NY 10022\nnot given\n500.00\nUnion for Teachers\nSuite 108\nCedar Rapids Building & Trades Council\nAmerican Tower Building\nReference & Safety Book\n911 Locust St.\n5110 J. St., S.W.\nCubuque, lowa 52001\n9/21/74\n200.00\nCedar Rapids, lowa 52404\nnot given\n750.00\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nActive Ballot Club\nGeneral Fund\n1775 K Street, N.W.\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/28/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n9/28/74\n1,000.00\nAFL-CIO COPE\nNational Education Assoc. - PAL\n815 16th St., N.W.\n9/12/74\n1,000.00\n10/4/74\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n700.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n9/27/74\n1,000.00\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher\nNortheast lowa Political Action Comm for Ed.\nWorkmen of N.A. COPE\nElkader, lowa 52043\n10/8/74\n100.00\n2800 N. Sheridan Road\nChicago, IL 60657\n9/20/74\n400.00\nUAW Region Five CAP\n8000 E. Jefferson\n9/3/74\n2,500.00\nAmalgamated Political Ed Comm.\nDetroit, MI 48214\n10/11/74\n1,000.00\n15 Union Square\nNew York, NY 10003\n9/28/74\n300.00\nCarpenters' Legislative Improv. Comm.\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nCedar Rapids Building & Trade Council\nWashington, DC 20001\n10/10/74\n500.00\nReference & Safety Book\n5110 J St., SW\nAFL-CIO COPE\nCedar Rapids, Iowa 52404\n10/11/74\n500.00\n815 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/17/74\n300.00\nDRIVE Chapter 238\n5110 J St. S.W.\nComm. On Political Education\nCedar Rapids, lowa 52404\n10/11/74\n1,000.00\nSecond Congressional District of lowa\n708 Old Marion Road, N.E.\nInt'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers\nCedar Rapids, lowa 52402\n10/19/74\n500.00\nCOPE\n1125 15th St., N.W.\nILGWU - Campaign Committee\nWashington, DC 20005\n9/26/74\n100.00\n1710 Broadway\nNew York, NY 10019\n10/15/74\n150.00\nInt'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers\nLocal 1362 COPE\n370 Blairs Ferry Rd, N.E.\n10/1/74\n100.00\nLaborer's Political League\nCedar Rapids, lowa 52402\n10/12/74\n500.00\n905 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/15/74\n500.00\n3\n2\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nMichael Blouin\nAFL-CIO COPE\n(cont'd)\n815 16th Street\n7/31/74\n2,500.00\nPaul Simon\nPolitical Educational Fund of the Building\nWashington, DC 20006\n8/26/74\n1,500.00\n(D) Illinois\n& Construction Trades Department\n(cont'd)\n815 16th Street, N.W. Room 603\nIndustrial Union Dept.\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/6/74\n200.00\nc/o Jake Clayman\n815 16th St., N.W.\nMEBA Political Action Fund - Regular Acc't.\nWashington, DC\n8/7/74\n500.00\n17 Battery Place\nNew York, NY 10004\n11/12/74\n1,000.00\nIBEW - COPE\n1125 15th St., N.W.\nFreedman, Borowsky and Lorry-Counselors at Law\nWashington, DC 20005\n7/20/74\n200.00\nAFL-CIO Maritime Committee - Philadelphia, PA\n100 Indiana Avenue, N.W. - - Suite 301\nMachinists' Non-Partisan Pol League\nWashington, DC 20001\n11/14/74\n250.00\nGeneral Fund\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nCoal Miners Political Action Comm.\nWashington, DC 20036\n6/19/74\n2,000.00\nVoluntary Contribution Fund - UMW\n900 15th Street, N.W.\nMeat Cutters COPE\nWashington, DC 20005\n11/14/74\n500.00\nLocal P-3\n8/7/74\n150.00\nCedar Rapids, Iowa 52400\n8/23/74\n200.00\nCommittee on Political Education\nAFL-CIO\nAmerican Federation of Musicians\n815 16th Street, N.W.\n641 Lexington Ave.\nWashington, DC 20006\n1/16/74\n2,500.00\nNew York, NY 10022\n8/20/74\n500.00\nUnited Steelworkers of America\nRailway Clerks Political League\nPolitical Action Fund\n6300 River Road\nWashington, DC 20006\n2/12/74\n2,000.00\nRosemont, IL 60018\n8/2/74\n1,000.00\nUnited Steelworkers of America\nService Employees Int'l Union-COPE\nPolitical Action Fund\n900 17th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n1/30/74\n1,000.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n8/12/74\n250.00\nOil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Inter.\nSheet Metal Workers Int'l Assoc.\nDist. 7, P.O. Box 63, Marshall, ILL 62441\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\nWayne A. Turner, Rep., B. J. Schafer, Secy-Treas.\n2/28/74\n125.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n8/19/74\n200.00\nUAW V. Cap\nTransportation Pol Ed. League\n8000 East Jefferson\n15401 Detroit Ave.\nDetroit, Mich. 48214\n2/26/74\n500.00\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n8/9/74\n300.00\nUAW - CAP\nNational Education Assoc.\n8000 E. Jefferson\nPolitical Action Committee\nDetroit, MI\n7/11/74\n2,500.00\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n3/16/74\n1,000.00\nCedar Rapids Building & Trades Council\n5110 J St., S.W.\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nCedar Rapids, lowa 52404\n8/31/74\n750,00\n1300 Connecticut Avenue - Room 405\nWashington, DC 20036\n3/16/74\n250.00\nTotal\n$36,900.00\nSEIU COPE Fund\nPaul Simon\nEngineers Political Education Comm.\n900 17th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC\n4/11/74\n250.00\n(D) Illinois\n1125 17th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/28/74\n250.00\nNational Education Association\nInter. Ladies' Garment Workers Union\nPolitical Action Committee\n1710 Broadway\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\n11/5/74\n250.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n4/20/74\n1,000.00\nNew York, NY 10019\n4\n5\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nPaul Simon\nIBEW-COPE\nPaul Simon\nUnited Auto Workers V Cap\n(D) Illinois\n1125 15th Street, N.W.\n(D) Illinois\n8000 East Jefferson\n(cont'd)\nWashington, DC 20006\n5/20/74\n250.00\n(cont'd)\nDetroit, MI 48214\n10/4/74\n2,000.00\nSignalmen's Political League\nCommittee on Political Education, AFL-CIO\nC. M. Chamberlain, Pres.\n815 16th St., N.W.\n601 West Golf Road\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/8/74\n2,500.00\nMr. Prospect, ILL\n5/23/74\n200.00\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nIllinois Legislative Committee\nGeneral Fund - 1300 Connecticut Ave.\nBrotherhood of Railway and Airline Clerks\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/10/74\n500.00\n405 North Clark Avenue\nPalatine, III.\n3/16/74\n1,000.00\nPeople Qualified Contribution Comm.\nAFSCME\nTransportation Political Ed. League\nState Employees\n10/10/74\n250.00\n15401 Detroit Avenue\nCleveland, Ohio\n3/16/74\n500.00\nRailway Labor Executives Assoc.\nPolitical League-Railway Labor Building\nCommittee on Political Education\n400 First St., N.W.\nAFL-CIO\nWashington, DC 20001\n10/22/74\n200.00\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n1/16/74\n2,500.00\nAmalgamated Clothing Workers of America\nPolitical Action Committee\nUnited Steelworkers of America\n15 Union Square\nPolitical Action Fund\nNew York, NY 10003\n10/22/74\n300.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n2/12/74\n2,000.00\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen\nOil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Inter.\nof North America - COPE Acct.\nDistrict 7 - P.O. Box 68\n2800 North Sheridan Road\nMarshall, ILL 62441\n2/28/74\n125.00\nChicago, IL 60657\n10/22/74\n500.00\nOil, Chemical and Atomic Workers Inter.\nUAW V. Cap\nP.O. Box 68\n8000 E. Jefferson\nMarshall, IL 62411\n10/22/74\n400.00\nDetroit, MI 48214\n2/26/74\n500.00\nUnited Steelworkers of America\nBrotherhood of Railway & Airline Clerks\n212 State St. Building\n10816 South Wood St.\nGranite City, IL 62040\n10/22/74\n2,000.00\nChicago, ILL 60643\n9/18/74\n1,000.00\nHotel and Restaurant Employees & Bartenders\nCommunication Workers of America\nInternational Union - Voluntary Contributions\n1925 K St., N.W.\n120 East Fourth St. - 13th Floor\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/18/74\n500.00\nCincinnati, Ohio 45202\n10/23/74\n500.00\nUnited Steelworkers of America\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nPolitical Action Fund\n1300 Connecticut Ave.\n5 Gateway Center\nWashington, DC 20036\n8/28/74\n1,500.00\nPittsburgh, PA 15222\n9/20/74\n2,000.00\nTotal\n$34,400.00\nAction Committee For Rural Electrification\nBox 19066\nJohn Dent\nWashington, DC 20036\n9/25/74\n600.00\nLaborers Political League\n(D) Pennsylvania\n905 16th Street, N.W.\nRetail Clerks International Assn.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/30/74\n2,000.00\nActive Ballot Club\nMachinist Non-Partisan Pol. League\n1775 K St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/25/74\n500.00\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/30/74\n500.00\n7\n6\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nJohn Dent\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters\nJohn Dent\nIBEW-COPE\n(D) Pennsylvania\n& Butcher Workmen COPE\n(D) Pennsylvania\nJ.D. Keenan, Treas.\n(cont'd)\n2800 N. Sheridan Road\n(cont'd)\n1125 - 15th Street, N.W.\nChicago, ILL 60657\n10/30/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20005\n11/11/74\n300.00\nTransportation Workers Union\nMEBA, Pol. Action Fund\nPolitical Fund\nC. A. Black\n99 University Place\n17 Battery Place\nNew York, NY 10003\n10/30/74\n500.00\nNew York, NY\n11/27/74\n1,000.00\nUnited Auto Workers V CAP\nSheetmetal Workers, Intn'l.\n8000 E. Jefferson Street\nPAC, 1750 New York Ave., N.W.\nDetroit, Mich. 48214\n10/31/74\n200.00\nWashington, DC\n11/27/74\n750.00\nTransportation Political Education League\nMaintenance of Way, Political League\n14600 Detroit Ave.\nH. C. Crotty, Pres.\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n11/6/74\n500.00\n12050 Woodward Ave.\nDetroit, Mich. 48203\n10/18/74\n300.00\nNat'l. Education Assoc.\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nNMU-PLOW\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/6/74\n200.00\n346 West 17th Street\nNew York, NY 10011\n10/22/74\n500.00\nBricklayers Political Action Comm.\n815 15th Street, N.W.\nSeafarers Pol. Action Committee\nWashington, DC 20005\n11/6/74\n200.00\nGene Greene\n674 4th Ave.\nP.E.F. Bldg. & Construc. Trade PAC\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n3/26/74\n500.00\n815 16th Street, N.W. Room 603\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/6/74\n500.00\nEngineers Political Education Committee\nJ.C. Turner, Treas.\nPAC - Operating Engin.\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\nDist 3 - 300 Seco Road\nWashington, DC 20036\n5/30/74\n250.00\nMonroeville, Penna.\n11/6/74\n$ 175.00\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Committee\nMEBA PAC\nCharles E. Nichols, Dir. & Treas.\nC. A. Black\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\n17 Battery Place\nWashington, DC 20001\n6/3/74\n750.00\nNew York, NY\n11/7/74\n2,500.00\nMEBA Political Action Fund\nComm. of Pol. Ed. - AFL-CIO\nCharles A. Black\n815 16th Street, N.W.\n17 Battery Place\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/8/74\n150.00\nNew York, NY 10004\n6/4/74\n2,500.00\nUnited Steelworkers of America\nBrotherhood of Railway Carmen of\nPAF, Walter Burke\nUS & Canada - Charles W. Hauck\nWashington, DC\n11/8/74\n1,000.00\n4929 Main Street\nKansas City, MO 64112\n6/11/74\n300.00\nDRIVE, Political Fund\nF. E. Fitzsimmons, Director\nIBEW-COPE\n25 Louisiana Ave., N.W.\nJ. D. Keenan, Treas.\nWashington, DC 20001\n11/8/74\n1,000.00\n1125 15th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n6/12/74\n300.00\nEng. Political Ed. Committee\nJ.C. Turner, Treas.\nNat'l Education Assoc., PAC\n1125 17th Street\nRichard E. Maxwell\nWashington, DC 20036\n11/8/74\n250.00\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC\n6/14/74\n200.00\n8\n9\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nJohn Dent\nRailway Labor Exec. Assoc. Political Lge.\n(D) Pennsylvania\nC. M. McLutosh\nJohn Dent\nLaborer's Political League\n(cont'd)\n400 1st Street, N.W.\n(D) Pennsylvania\nW. V. Reed\nWashington, DC 20001\n6/17/74\n200.00\n(cont'd)\n905 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n7/24/74\n1,000.00\nS.E.I.U. Cope-Fund - PCC\nGeorge Hardy, Pres.\nSheet Metal Workers International Assoc.\n900 17th Street, N.W.\nPolitical Action League-Edward Carlaugh, Chm.\nWashington, DC 20006\n6/17/74\n300.00\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n7/15/74\n200.00\nTransportation Political Education League\nJ. R. Snyder, Nat'l Legal Dir.\nDRIVE Political Fund\n15401 Detroit Ave.\nF.E. Fitzsimmons, Dir.\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n6/13/74\n1,000.00\n25 Louisiana Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20001\n7/19/74\n1,500.00\nRailway Clerks Political League\nC. L. Dennis, Chairman\nComm. on Fed. Employee Political Ed.\n6300 River Road\nDennis Garrison, Secy.\nRosemont, ILL 60018\n6/19/74\n500.00\n1325 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n7/26/74\n200.00\nPainters & Allied Trades\nS. Frank Raftery, Chairman\nAmalgamated Political Education Comm.\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\nMurray H. Finley, Chm.\nWashington, DC 20006\n6/26/74\n$ 100.00\n15 Union Square\nNew York, NY 10003\n7/26/74\n250.00\nILGWU Campaign Committee\nLouis Stulberg\nFire Fighters COPE\n1710 Broadway\nW.H. McClennan, Pres.\nNew York, NY 10019\n6/25/74\n500.00\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n7/9/74\n300.00\nGraphic Arts International Union\nPolitical Cont. Comm.\nEngineers Political Education Comm.\nEdward V. Danshire - 1900 L St.\nJ. C. Turner, Treas.\nWashington, DC 20036\n6/25/74\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\n200.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n7/23/74\n250.00\nUnited Steelworkers of America\nComm. Workers of America COPE-PAC\nPolitical Action Fund\nLouis B. Knechts, Chm.\nWalter Burke, Treas.\n1925 K Street, N.W.\n5 Gateway Center\nPittsburgh, PA 15222\n1,000.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n7/30/74\n200.00\n6/7/74\nCommittee on Political Education\nCarpenters Leg. Imp. Comm.\nPA AFL-CIO, COPE\nC. E. Nichols, Director\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nMichael Johnson, Dir.\n101 Pine Street\nWashington, DC 20001\n8/6/74\n750.00\nHarrisburg, PA\n7/2/74\n1,000.00\nSeafarers Political Action Comm.\nIndustrial Union Dept. AFL-CIO\n675 4th Ave.\nJacob Claymore, Secy-Treas.\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n9/4/74\n500.00\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n7/3/74\n500.00\nComm. on Pol. Ed. AFL-CIO\nL. Kirkland Secy-Treas.\nPolitical Action Committee Education\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nConn. Union of Tele. Workers\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/11/74\n1,000.00\nJoseph E. LaChonce, Chm.\nHamden, CT 06518\n7/12/74\n100.00\nUAW-CAP Ray Ross, Dir.\n8000 E. Jefferson St.\nDetroit, MI 48214\n9/14/74\n300.00\n10\n11\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nJohn Dent\nCOPE-URCLPWA - Ike Gold\nRobert Cornell\nCOPE-AFL-CIO-\n(D) Pennsylvania\n87 So. High Street,\n(Cont'd)\n815 16th St., N.W.\n(cont'd)\nAkron, Ohio 44308\n10/3/74\n250.00\nWashington, DC\n7/5/74\n3,500.00\nAmerican Federation of Teachers-COPE\nCOPE, WISC, AFL-CIO\nRachelle Horowitz, Dir.\n6333 W. Blue Mound Rd.\n1012 14th Street, N.W.\nMilwaukee, WI\n8/11/74\n1,750.00\nWashington, DC 20005\n10/18/74\n250.00\nRailway Clerks Political League\nTotal\n$29,275.00\n6300 River Road\nRosemont, ILL\n8/23/74\n500.00\nRobert Cornell\nLocal 482 PEP Comm.\nIBEW-COPE\n(D) Wisconsin\nNeenah, Wisc.\n10/31/74\n$ 150.00\n1125 15th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n8/30/74\n150.00\nLocal 298 COPE\nGreen Bay, Wisc.\n10/31/74\n180.00\nWISC AFL-CIO COPE\n6333 W. Blue Mound Rd.\nBoilermakers AFL-CIO\nMilwaukee, WI\n8/30/74\n2,500.00\nLegislative Committe\nKewaunee, Wisc.\n10/31/74\n220.00\nUnited Paperworkers Political Education Prog.\n163 Horace Harding Expwy.\nLaborers Political League\nFlushing, NY\n9/4/74\n500.00\n905 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/31/74\n250.00\nUnited Steelworkers of America P&F\nWashington, 6, DC\n9/17/74\n1,000.00\nUnited Transportation Union, Wisconsin\nLegislative Board\nILGWU Campaign Committee\n735 Division St.\n1710 Broadway\nAltona, Wisconsin\n11/16/74\n300.00\nNew York, NY\n9/19/74\n250.00\nIronworkers Political Action League\nInd. Union Dept., Volunteer Fund\n1750 New York Ave.\n815 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n11/16/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC\n10/1/74\n500.00\nUnited Paperworkers Political Action Fund\nWisconsin Progressive Labor Committee\n163 Horace Harding Expressway\n3520 West Oklahoma Ave.\nFlushing, NY\n11/17/74\n415.00\nMilwaukee, WI\n10/1/74\n400.00\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nAction Comm. for Rural Electrification\n1300 Connecticut Ave.\n10/29/74\n1,000.00\nBox 19066\nWashington, DC\n11/16/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC\n10/4/74\n300.00\nAFL-CIO COPE\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\n815 16th St.,\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/29/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC\n10/10/74\n$ 1,000.00\nChicago Joint Board Political Action Comm.\nUAW-V, CAP\n333 So. Ashland Blvd.\n8000 E. Jefferson\nChicago, ILL\n10/29/74\n200.00\nDetroit, MI\n10/10/74\n3,000.00\nNEA Political Action Committee\nBrewery Workers - COPE\n1201 16th St., N.W.\n2189 North 48th St.\nWashington, DC\n10/31/74\n500.00\nMilwaukee, WI\n10/10/74\n300.00\nAmalgamated Political Education Comm.\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Comm.\n15 Union Square\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nNew York, 3, NY\n10/31/74\n300.00\nWashington, DC\n10/10/74\n500.00\n12\n13\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nRobert Cornell\nAFL-CIO COPE\nFrank Thompson\nDrive Political Fund\n(cont'd)\n815 16th St.\nWashington, DC\n10/19/74\n750.00\n(D) New Jersey\n25 Louisiana Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/26/74\n$ 500.00\nNEA Political Action Committee\n1201 16th St.\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Committee\nWashington, DC\n10/19/74\n500.00\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20001\n10/29/74\n300.00\nUAW V. CAP\nRetail Store Employees-Active Ballot Club\n8000 E. Jefferson\nof Local 1262\nDetroit, MI\n10/19/74\n1,250.00\n1389 Broad St.\nClifton, NJ 07013\n10/29/74\n250.00\nUnited Paperworkers Int'I-Political Action Prog.\n163 Horace Harding Expwy.\nUnited Steelworkers-PAC\nFlushing, NY\n10/19/74\n1,000.00\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/29/74\n500.00\nLaborers' Political League\n905 16th St. N.W.\nTWUA Political Fund\nWashington, DC\n10/19/74\n500.00\n99 University Place\nNew York, NY 10003\n10/30/74\n500.00\nRetail Clerks Int'l Ass'n-Active Ballot Club\n1775 K St.\n10/24/74\nEngineers Political Education Committee\nWashington, DC\n500.00\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/30/74\n250.00\nOCAW Political & Legislative\nBox 2812\nDenver, CO\n10/15/74\n300.00\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters, COPE\n2800 N. Sheridan Road\n10/30/74\n500.00\nAMCBW-COPE\nChicago, ILL 60657\n2800 Sheridan Rd. N.\nPolitical Education Fund\nChicago, ILL\n10/15/74\n250.00\nBuilding & Construction Trades Dept.\n8th District COPE\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nAppleton, WI\n10/19/74\n300.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/1/74\n400.00\nAFL-CIO Political Action Account\nSEIU Cope Fund\n843 E. South\n900 17th Street, N.W.\nAppleton, WI\n10/19/74\n300.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/1/74\n1,000.00\nNational PEOPLE Comm.\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nAFSCME - Box 6587\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n250.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n11/1/74\n500.00\n10/19/74\nCWA COPE\nILGWU Campaign Committee\n1925 K Street\n1710 Broadway\n250.00\nWashington, DC\n10/19/74\n750.00\nNew York, NY 10019\n11/1/74\nTransportation Political Education League\nHotel & Restaurant Employees TIP Fund\n15401 Detroit Ave.\n120 East Fourth Street\nCleveland, OHIO\n10/19/74\n300.00\nCincinnati, Ohio 45202\n11/1/74\n500.00\nWisconsin AFL-CIO COPE\nTransportation Political Education League\n6333 West Blue Mound Road\n14600 Detroit Ave.\nMilwaukee, WI\n10/24/74\n1,100.00\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n11/4/74\n300.00\nCOPE Convention\nBricklayers Action Committee\nGreen Bay, WI\n10/15/74\n260.00\n815 15th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n11/4/74\n200.00\nTotal\n$29,175.00\n14\n15\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nFrank Thompson\nActive Ballot Club\nFrank Thompson\nTransportation Political Education\n(D) New Jersey\n1775 K Street, N.W.\n(D) New Jersey\nLeague\n(cont'd)\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/6/74\n250.00\n(cont'd)\n15401 Detroit Avenue\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n2/4/74\n500.00\nCWA-COPE-PCC\n1925 K Street, N.W.\nCOPE-AFL-CIO\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/26/74\n250.00\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/15/74\n1,000.00\nSEIU COPE Fund\n900 17th Street, N.W.\nN.J. State Carpenters\nWashington, DC 20006\n5/14/74\n500.00\nNon-Partisan Political Comm.\nc/o James E. Moss\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\nLafayette, New Jersey 07848\n10/21/74\n300.00\n674 Fourth Avenue\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n5/20/74\n500.00\nCommittee on Federal Employees\nPolitical Education\nEngineers Political Education Committee\n1325 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n5/28/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n5/20/74\n250.00\nUnited Auto Workers V. CAP\nI.L.G.W.U. Campaign Committee\n8000 E. Jefferson\n1710 Broadway\nDetroit, Mich. 48214\n5/28/74\n500.00\nNew York, NY 10019\n5/22/74\n250.00\nLaborer's Political League\nMEBA Political Action Fund\n905 16th Street, N.W.\n17 Battery Place\nWashington, DC 20006\n5/28/74\n1,000.00\nNew York, NY 10004\n3/20/74\n2,000.00\nAmer. Federation of Teachers\nCOPE, AFL-CIO\nComm. on Political Ed. - Million Dollar Fund\n815 16th Street, N.W.\n1012 14th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n5/7/74\n2,500.00\nWashington, DC 20005\n6/3/74\n250.00\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\nNMU PLOW\n675 Fourth Ave.\n346 W. 17th Street,\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n9/13/74\n500.00\nNew York, NY 10011\n6/4/74\n500.00\nFire Fighters - COPE\nMEBA Pol. Action Fund\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\n17 Battery Place\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/30/74\n200.00\nNew York, NY 10004\n6/12/74\n1,500.00\nLaborer's Political League\nPeople Qualified Contrib. Comm.\n905 16th Street, N.W.\nAFSCME Box 6587\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/30/74\n2,000.00\nWashington, DC 20009\n6/14/74\n500.00\nIBEW-COPE\nSEIU COPE Fund\n1125 Fifteenth St., N.W.\n900 17th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n10/2/74\n$ 500.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n6/17/74\n1,000.00\nNational Education Ass'n PAC\nCarpenter's Legis. Imp. Comm.\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/4/74\n2,000.00\nWashington, DC 20001\n7/23/74\n600.00\nLocal 1199 Brotherhood Fund\nTotal\n$26,300.00\n310 W. 43rd Street\nNew York, NY 10033\n10/10/74\n500.00\nRon Mottl\nCOPE AFL-CIO\n(D) Ohio\nB. Kirkland Secy.\n815 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/29/74\n2,500.00\n16\n17\nANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nMottl\nCleveland Teachers Union #279\nRon Mottl\nREPEC Rural Electrification Pol.\nOhio\nCOPE Fund-J. O'Meara, Secy.\n(D) Ohio\nEducation Committee\nont'd)\n602 Engineers Bldg.\n(cont'd)\n155 E. Superior Street\nCleveland, Ohio 44114\n10/29/74\n250.00\nChicago, IL 60611\n4/18/74\n300.00\nLaborers Political League\nUAW V. CAP\nJ. Curran, Director\n8000 E. Jefferson\n905 16th St., N.W.\nDetroit, MI 48214\n4/18/74\n1,000.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/29/74\n500.00\nRetail Store Employees #880\nUAW V. CAP\nActive Ballot Club No. 1\nL. Woodcock, Treas.\n2828 Eudlic Ave.\n8000 E. Jefferson\nCleveland, Ohio 44113\n4/24/74\n120.00\nDetroit, MI 48214\n10/29/74\n1,000.00\nDistrict Council #78\nMachinist Non-Partisan Political League\nPeople Committee\nE. Glover, Chairman\n10/28/74\n500.00\n1925 St. Clair Avenue\n1300 Connecticut\nCleveland, Ohio 44114\n4/24/74\n100.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/28/74\n500.00\nMachinist Non-Partisan Pol. League\nPlumbing-Pipefitting U.A. Political Education\n1300 Connecticut Ave. Room 405\nCommittee-M. Ward, President\nWashington, DC 20036\n4/29/74\n500.00\n901 Massachusetts\nWashington, DC 20001\n10/25/74\n500,00\nCuyahoga-Medina Counties, UAW\nCommunity Action Council\nURCLWA COPE Fund Committee\n17250 Hunnel Road\nIke Gold, Treas.\nBrookpark, Ohio\n5/1/74\n120.00\n87 South High St.\nAkron, Ohio 44308\n10/25/74\n250.00\nLocal 1250 UAW\nPolitical Action\nBuilding Construction Political Education Fund\n17250 Hunnel Road\nR. Georgine, Secy.\nBrookpark, Ohio\n5/4/74\n120.00\n815 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/25/74\n200.00\nTransportation Political Ed. League\n15401 Detroit Ave.\n6/1/74\n500.00\nActive Ballot Club-1\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n7/8/74\n500.00\nRetail Store Employees No. 880\n2828 Euclid Avenue\nMachinists Non-Partisan\nCleveland, Ohio 44115\n10/29/74\n250.00\nPolitical League - General Fund\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nOCAW Volunteer Fund\nWashington, DC 20036\n7/5/74\n2,000.00\n499 Kenilworth\nBay Village, Ohio 44140\n10/29/74\n300.00\nFiremen-Oilers Political League\n200 Maryland'\nAmalgamated Meatcutters COPE\nWashington, DC 20002\n7/11/74\n200.00\n2800 N. Sheridan\nChicago, IL 60657\n10/29/74\n300.00\nSEIU COPE Fund\n900 17th St., N.W.\nOhio DRIVE\n4/16/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n6/28/74\n500.00\n2020 Carnegie Avenue\nCleveland, Ohio 44115\n4/16/74\n500.00\nIBEW COPE\n1125 15th Street\nCleveland AFL-CIO COPE\nWashington, DC 20005\n7/30/74\n150.00\nSuite 411 — Manger Hotel\nCleveland, Ohio 44114\n4/18/74\n120.00\nInternational Brotherhood-Painters Allied\nTrades\nWashington, DC\n7/23/74\n200.00\n19\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTION\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nRon Mottl\nOhio DRIVE\nRon Mottl\nRailway Labor Executives,\n(D) Ohio\nJ. Presser, Treas.\n(D) Ohio\n400 1st Street\n(cont'd)\n2020 Carnegie Ave.\n(cont'd)\nWashington, DC 20001\n8/13/74\n200.00\nCleveland, Ohio 44115\n9/24/74\n1,000.00\nHotel-Restaurant Employees\nBoilermakers-Blacksmiths Legislative\nEd. Comm.\nJ. Gibson, Treas.\n120 East 4th Street\nLEAP\nKansas City, Kansas\n8/7/74\n500.00\nCincinnati, Ohio 45202\n10/16/74\n500.00\nMolders Political Fund\nLocal - 1005\nA.J. Trizna, Pres.\nRefund-Hall Rent\n1225 E. McMillan St.\n5615 Chevrolet Blvd.\nParma, Ohio 44130\n3/18/74\n125.00\nCincinnati, Ohio 45206\n10/18/74\n200.00\nAmerican Fed. Teachers, COPE\nPainters District Council #6-COPE Fund\n1280 West 3rd Street\nR. Horowitz, Dir.\n100.00\n1012 14th St.\nCleveland, Ohio 44129\n4/8/74\nWashington, DC 20005\n10/18/74\n250.00\nAmalgamated Political Education Comm.\nUAW Local 1005\nM.H. Finley, Chairman\n5615 Chevrolet Blvd.\n15 Union Square\nNew York, NY 10003\n9/3/74\n300.00\nParma, Ohio 44130\n10/22/74\n275.00\nTotal\nSheet Metal Int. Assoc. #65\n$23,830.00\nPaul Ristau, Mgr.\n3515 Prospect Avenue\nLloyd Meeds\nNat'l Education Assoc. Political Action Comm.\nCleveland, Ohio 44115\n9/4/74\n200.00\n(D) Washington\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n11/4/74\n200.00\nIron Workers Pol. Action Comm.\nJohn Lyons, Pres.\nNat'l Education Assoc. Political Action Comm.\n1750 New York Ave.\nWashington, DC 20005\n9/5/74\n500.00\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n11/4/74\n1,100.00\nComm. on Political Education-AFL-CIO\nAction Comm. For Rural Electrification\nL. Kirkland, Treas.\nP.O. Box 19066\n815 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/12/74\n2,500.00\nWashington, DC\n11/4/74\n500.00\nCWA-COPE-PCC\nTransportation Political Education League\n15401 Detroit Avenue\nL.B. Knecht, Treas\nCleveland, oH 44107\n11/4/74\n300.00\n1925 K Street\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/6/74\n200.00\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\n675 Fourth Avenue\nActive Ballot Club\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n11/4/74\n500.00\nP. Hall, Secy.\nSuffridge Building\nWashington, DC\n9/18/74\n500.00\nNational PEOPLE Committee\nP.O. Box 6587\nILGWU, Campaign Comm.\nWashington, DC 20009\n11/4/74\n100.00\nL. Sutlberg, Chairman\nCommunications Political Action Committee\n1710 Broadway\nNew York, NY 10019\n9/18/74\n250.00\nP.O. Box 83 Ben Franklin Station\nWashington, DC 20044\n11/4/74\n100.00\nUAW V. Cap\nL. Woodcock, Treas.\nBoilermakers-Blacksmiths Legislative Education\n9/17/74\n1,000.00\n8000 W. Jefferson\nAction Program\nDetroit, MI 48214\n9/17/74\n1,000.00\n400 First Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20001\n11/4/74\n500.00\n20\n21\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nLloyd Meeds\nSailors Union of the Pacific\nLloyd Meeds\nPatrick Nilan\n(D) Washington\nAmerican Postal Workers Union\n(D) Washington\nSailors Political Fund\n(cont'd)\n(cont'd)\n450 Harrison Street\n817 14th Street, N.W.\nSan Francisco, CA\n11/8/74\n200.00\nWashington, DC\n1/21/74\n100.00\nAmalgamated Political Education Committee\nJoseph D. Keenan\n15 Union Square\nIBEW 1125 15th St., N.W.\nNew York, NY 10003\n11/8/74\n400.00\nWashington, DC 20005\n1/21/74\n200.00\nOCAW Political & Legislative League\nDave Sweeney, Political Director\n304 Freeway Cntr, Building\nDRIVE Political Fund\n25 Louisiana Avenue\n3605 Long Beach Blvd.\nLong Beach, CA 90807\n11/8/74\n300.00\nWashington, DC 20001\n1/22/74\n1,000.00\nCharles E. Nichols\nPolitical Educational Fund of the Building\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Committee\n& Construction Trades Department\n101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.\n815 16th Street, N.W. Room 603\nWashington, DC 20001\n1/25/74\n300.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/8/74\n$ 300.00\nA. H. Chesser\nIBEW COPE\nTransportation Political Education League\n1125 15th Street, N.W.\n15401 Detroit Avenue\nWashington, DC 20005\n11/6/74\n100.00\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n1/28/74\n500.00\nRailway Clerks Political League\nPhil Carlip\n6300 River Road\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\nRosemont, IL 60018\n11/6/74\n200.00\n674 Fourth Avenue\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n1/30/74\n500.00\nCommittee on Federal Employees\nPolitical Education\nC. L. Dennis, Chairman\nWashington, DC\n11/6/74\n100.00\nRailway Clerks Political League\n6300 River Road\nNMU - PLOW\nRosemont, IL 60018\n2/4/74\n400.00\n346 West 17th Street\nNew York, NY 10011\n11/4/74\n250.00\nJoe Davis, Chairman\nWashington State Committee on Political Ed.\nFire Fighters COPE\nState Branch AFL-CIO-COPE\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/4/74\n100.00\n2800 1st Avenue\nSeattle, WA 98121\n1/31/74\n1,000.00\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers Workmen\nof North America\nJ. C. Turner, Secy-Treas.\n2800 N. Sheridan Road\nEngineers Political Education Comm.\nChicago, IL 60657\n11/4/74\n400.00\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n2/6/74\n500.00\nActive Ballot Club\n1775 K Street, N.W.\nThomas C. Burkholder\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/11/74\n250.0\nOCAW Political & Legislative League\n203 West Holly\nUnited Steelworkers of America\nBellingham, WA 98225\n2/6/74\n100.00\n424 Evergreen Bldg.\n15 So. Grady Way\nMaintenance of Way Political League\nRenton, WA 98055\n11/18/74\n500.00\n12050 Woodward Avenue\nDetroit, MI\n2/11/74\n200.00\nEdward V. Donahue, Chairman\nPolitical Contributions Comm.\nCWA-COPE-PCC\nGraphic Arts International Union\n1925 K Street, N.W.\n1900 L Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n2/11/74\n100.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n1/21/74\n200.00\n22\n23\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nLloyd Meeds\nLouis Stulberg\nLloyd Meeds\nPeople Qualified Comm. (AFSCME)\n(D) Washington\nILGWU Campaign Committee\n(D) Washington\nP.O. Box 6587\n(cont'd)\n1710 Broadway\n(cont'd)\nWashington, DC 20009\n3/4/74\n200.00\nNew York, NY 10019\n2/14/74\n250.00\nLeonard Woodcock\nB.J. Shaefer\nUAW V. Cap.\nOCAW Political & Legislative League\n8000 E. Jefferson\nP.O. Box 2812\nDetroit, MI\n2/25/74\n500.00\nDenver, CO 80201\n2/14/74\n200.00\nGeneva M. Barnes, Acting Director\nCommittee on Fed. Employees Pol. Ed.\nLaborers Political League\n1325 Mass. Avenue, N.W.\n905 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC\n1/24/74\n$ 500.00\nWashington, DC\n2/25/74\n100.00\nMorris D. Langberg\nAmerican Federation of Teachers\nWashington, DC\n2/13/74\n100.00\nLocal 302 Voluntary Political Fund\nUnion of Operating Engineers\nWestern Ave. & Clay Streets\nWashington State Comm. Political Ed.\nSeattle, WA 98121\n2/19/74\n500.00\nState Branch AFL-CIO\n2800 1st Avenue\nSeattle, WA 98121\n2/19/74\n1,000.00\nJacob Clayman\nIndustrial Union Department Vol. Funds\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington Fed. of State Employees AFL-CIO\nWashington, DC 20006\n2/21/74\n250.00\n201 W. 5th Ave., Room 401\nOlympia, WA\n1/29/74\n200.00\nWashington State Machinist Non-Partisan\nPolitical League\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political Comm.\nSeattle, WA 98121\n3/13/74\n200.00\n1300 Connecticut Ave., Room 405\nWashington, DC\n1/31/74\n500.00\nNational Ed. Ass'n.-Pol. Activities Comm.\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nPainters and Allied Trades\nWashington, DC\n2/7/74\n100.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n3/6/74\n200.00\nWash. State Ass'n. of Electrical Workers\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\n674 4th Avenue\n1718 Melrose Ave.\nSeattle, WA 98122\n2/12/74\n200.00\nBrooklyn, NY\nmissing\n500.00\nMEBA Political Action Fund\nEverett Fire Fighters Local #350\n2801 Oakes\n17 Battery Place\nEverett, WA\n2/15/74\n100.00\nNew York, NY 10004\n8/29/74\n1,500.00\nNational Education Ass'n. Pol. Action Comm.\nAmalgamated Transit Union\nEverett, WA 98201\n2/14/74\n100.00\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n9/4/74\n500.00\nCOPE Volunteer Fund - AFL-CIO\nSeattle, WA\n2/15/74\n100.00\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Comm.\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20001\n10/9/74\n600.00\nWashington State Machinist Non-Partisan\nPolitical League\nWashington State Comm. on Pol. Ed.-AFL-CIO\n5527 Airport Way So.\nSeattle, WA 98108\n2/13/74\n200.00\n2800 First Ave., South\nSeattle, WA 98121\n9/9/74\n500.00\nSEIU COPE Fund\nAMF-TEMPO Political Cont. Comm.\n900 17th Street\nWashington, DC 20006\n2/15/74\n250.00\n220 Mount Pleasant Ave.\nNewark, NJ 07104\n9/19/74\n250.00\n24\n25\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nLloyd Meeds\nIndustrial Union Dept. Voluntary Funds\nPeter Peyser\nActive Ballot Club\n(D) Washington\n815 16th Street, N.W.\n(R) New York\nRetail Food Clerks Union Local 1500\n(cont'd)\nWashington, DC\n10/21/74\n$ 250.00\n(cont'd)\n221-10 Jamaica Ave.,\nQueens Village, NY 11428\n10/15/74\n500.00\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\n1300 Conn. Ave., N.W.\nAmerican Federation of Teachers COPE\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/21/74\n200.00\n1012 14th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n10/15/74\n250.00\nWashington State Labor Council AFL-CIO\n2800 First Ave., South\nVOTE/COPE\nSeattle, WA 98121\n10/21/74\n1,000.00\n150 State Street\nAlbany, NY 12207\n10/16/74\n4,280.00\nTotal\n$22,550.00\nCommittee on Political Education (AMCOPE)\nAmalgamated Meatcutters & Butcher Workmen\nPeter Peyser\nActive Ballot Club'\n2800 N. Sheridan Rd.\n(R) New York\n1775 K Street, N.W.\nChicago, IL 60657\n10/18/74\n400.00\nWashington, DC\n10/29/74\n1,000.00\nCOPE - Local 1-2, utility Workers Union of\nBuilding & Const. Trades Dept. Pol. Ed. Fund\nAmerica AFL-CIO\n815 16th St., N.W.\n386 Park Ave. South\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/29/74\n300.00\nNew York, NY 10016\n10/16/74\n200.00\nILGWU Campaign Committee\nAFL-CIO COPE\n1710 Broadway\n815 16th St., N.W.\nNew York, NY 10019\n10/29/74\n250.00\nWashington, DC\n10/16/74\n2,500.00\nLaborers' Political League\nCommunication Workers of America\n905 16th St., N.W.\nLocal 1103\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/29/74\n250.00\n791 Central Avenue\nScarsdale, NY 10583\n9/19/74\n500.00\nRailway Clerks Political League\n6300 River Road\nRosemont, IL 60018\n10/29/74\n300.00\nLaborers' Political League\n905 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/24/74\n500.00\nTransportation Workers of Greater NY\nPolitical Contribution Comm.\nLocal 100\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\nSPAD\n1980 Broadway\nNew York, NY 10023\n10/29/74\n500.00\n674 4th Avenue\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n6/1/74\n500.00\nPainters & Allied Trades-Pol. Action Together\nEngineers Political ED. Comm.\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\n1125 17th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n11/8/74\n300.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n6/14/74\n250.00\nAFL-CIO COPE\nSEIU COPE Fund\n815 16th St., N.W.\n900 17th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/25/74\n2,500.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n6/14/74\n250.00\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nNational Education Assoc. Pol. Action Comm.\nDistrict 15\n1201 16th St., N.W.\n7 East 15th Street\n10/25/74\n100.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n8/6/74\n2,000.00\nNew York, NY\nCarpenters' Legislative Improvement Comm.\nMachinist Non-Partisan Political League\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\n500.00\nWashington, DC\n8/15/74\n600.00\nWashington, DC\n10/25/74\n26\n27\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nPeter Peyser\nInt'l. Union of Operating Engineers'\n(R) New York\nWilliam Clay\nAmerican Federation of Teachers\n1360 Pleasantville Road\n(cont'd)\nBriarcliff Manor, NY 10510\n4/4/74\n1,000.00\n(D) Missouri\nCommittee on Political Education\n(cont'd)\nMillion Dollar Fund\nDRIVE Political Fund\nWashington, DC\n10/28/72\n100.00\n25 Louisiana Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20001\n4/4/74\nAcre Committee\n1,000.00\nSillie Ramsey, Tres.\nTroy, Missouri\n10/28/72\n100.00\nCarpenters Legislative Improv. Comm.\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20001\n4/9/74\n500.00\nIndustrial Union Dept.\nVoluntary Funds\nLocal 1177-Communications Workers of Amer.\nWashington, DC\n10/31/72\n1,000.00\n299 Broadway\nNew York, NY 10007\n5/1/74\n25.00\nActive Ballot Club\nWashington, DC\n10/31/72\n250.00\nIBEW-COPE\n1125 15th St., N.W.\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers\nWashington, DC\n5/1/74\n200.00\nWorkmen of North America\n2800 N. Sheridan Rd.\nRetail Clerks Union, Local 888\nChicago, ILL\n10/31/72\n500.00\n229 Park Avenue\nNew York, NY 10003\n5/14/74\n100.00\nRailway Clerks Political League\n6300 River Road\nTotal\n$21,555.00\nRosemont, ILL\n11/1/72\n200.00\nCWA Cope-Pcc\n1925 K Street, N.W.\nWilliam Clay\nTWVA Political Fund\nWashington, DC\n11/1/72\n250.00\n(D) Missouri\n99 University Place\nNew York, NY\n10/27/72\n250.00\nPolitical Action Fund, Mapes\n1644 Eleventh St., N.W.\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nWashington, DC\n11/1/72\n300.00\n1300 Connecticut Ave.\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/27/72\n500.00\nPeople Qualified Contributions Comm. AFSCME\nWashington, DC\n11/20/72\n750.00\nCommittee on Political Education - AFL-CIO\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nKen Worley\nWashington, DC\n10/28/72\n1,000.00\nUAW-Region 5\n130 S. Beniston Suite 308\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Committee\nSt. Louis, MO 63105\n7/17/74\n1,000.00\n101 Constitution Ave.\nWashington, DC\n10/28/72\n500.00\nI.L.G.W.U.\nCampaign Committee\nLaborers Political League\nFloyd Edmonds\n905 10th Street\n4031 N. Market\n7/24/74\n200.00\nWashington, DC\n10/28/72\n500.00\nSt. Louis, MO\nInternational Brotherhood, Electrical Workers\nCommittee - Political Education\nLocal #1\nAFL-CIO\n5850 Elizabeth Ave.\n815 16th St., N.W.\nSt. Louis, MO 63110\n10/28/72\n100.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n7/24/74\n2,000.00\nPolitical Education Fund, Building & Construction\nTeamsters Joint Council\nTrades Department\nNo. 13 D.R.I.V.E.\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nEdwin Dorsey\nWashington, DC\n10/28/72\n400.00\n300 S. Grand\n7/23/74\n300.00\nSt. Louis, MO\n28\n29\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nWilliam Clay\nNon-Partisan Transportation Action\nWilliam Clay\nHoward F. Dow-Machinists Non-\n(D) Missouri\nCommittee\n6/7/74\n100.00\n(D) Missouri\nPartisan Political League\n(cont'd)\n(cont'd)\n1300 Connecticut Ave.\nMissouri Action Committee\nWashington, DC 20036\n8/12/74\n500.00\nfor Rural Electrification (ACRE)\n6/9/74\n300.00\nVictoria Slopah-Machinists Non-Partisan\nLaborer's Political League\nPolitical League\n905 16th Street, N.W.\nDistrict #9\n8/12/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC\n6/10/74\n500.00\nSt. Louis, MO\nMEBA Political Fund\n17 Battery Place\nU.A. Political Education Committee\nNew York, NY 10004\n6/13/74\n1,000.00\nWashington, DC\n(United Association of Journeymen &\nCWA-COPE-PCC\nApprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting\nIndustry of the U.S. & Canada)\n10/25/74\n$ 250.00\n1925 K Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n6/14/74\n250.00\nPublic Affairs Council - Nat'l. Fed. of\nCWA-CAC\nFederal Employees\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/25/74\n50.00\n2334 Olive Street\nSt. Louis, MO 63103\n6/21/74\n250.00\nAmalgamated Transit Union\nNational Education Assn.-Political\nCommittee on Political Education\nAction Committee\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/25/74\n100.00\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n5/2/74\n500.00\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\nPolitical Action Fund NAPFE\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n10/25/74\n300.00\n1644 Eleventh Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20001\n5/7/74\n500.00\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters\n2800 N. Sheridan Road\nChicago, ILL 60657\n10/25/74\n400.00\nPeople Qualified Contribution\nCommittee (AFSCME)\nP.O. Box 6587\nBottlers, Local 1187\nWashington, DC 20009\n5/22/74\n500.00\nEducation Fund\n1611 South Broadway\nSt. Louis, MO 63104\n10/25/74\n50.00\nFire Fighters COPE\n905 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n5/31/74\n300.00\nBuilding & Trades Educational Fund\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/25/74\n300.00\nSeafarers Political Activity\nDonation; S.P.A.D.\nAmerican Postal Workers\n674 Fourth Avenue\n\"Political Action Fund\"\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n5/8/74\n500.00\n517 14th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n7/18/74\n250.00\nTotal\n$18,850.00\nAmalgamated Political Education Committee\n15 Union Square\nJohn Brademas\nUAW Community Action Voluntary Fund\nNew York, NY 10003\n6/1/74\n500.00\n(D) Indiana\n1125 15th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n10/30/74\n100.00\nTransportation Political Education League\n15401 Detroit Avenue\nILGWU Campaign Committee\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n6/1/74\n500.00\n1710 Broadway\nNew York, NY 10019\n10/30/74\n250.00\nEngineers Political Education Committee\n1125 Seventeenth St., N.W.\nTransportation Political Education League\nWashington, DC 20036\n6/1/74\n250.00\n14600 Detroit Avenue\nCleveland, OH 44107\n11/1/74\n300.00\n31\n30\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nJohn Brademas\nCommittee on Political Education (COPE)\nJohn Brademas\nNEA-PAC\n(D) Indiana\nAFL-CIO\n(D) Indiana\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\n(cont'd)\n815 16th Street, N.W.\n(cont'd)\nWashington, DC 20036\n11/1/74\n1,000.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n5/14/74\n2,000.00\nAmalgamated Political Education Committee\nPeople Qualified Contribution Committee\n15 Union Square\nAFSCME\nNew York, NY 10003\n11/4/74\n400.00\nP.O. Box 6587\nWashington, DC 20009\n5/16/74\n250.00\nCommunications Workers of America\nCOPE-PCC\nSEIU COPE Fund\n1925 K Street, N.W.\n900 17th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/1/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n5/20/74\n$ 250.00\nIndustrial Union Department\nTransportation Political Education League\nAFL-CIO-IUD Voluntary Funds\n15401 Detroit Avenue\n815 16th Street\nCleveland, OH 44107\n5/14/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/1/74\n200.00\nInternational Brotherhood of Painters\nDRIVE Political Fund\n& Allied Trades\n25 Louisiana Avenue, N.W.\nPolitical Action Together-Political Fund\nWashington, DC 20001\n11/8/74\n1,000.00\n1750 New York Avenue, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n5/21/74\n150.00\nMEBA Political Action Fund\n17 Battery Place\nCommittee on Federal Employees\nNew York, NY 10004\n11/4/74\n500.00\nPolitical Education\n1325 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 607\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nWashington, DC 20005\n5/16/74\n200.00\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 200036\n10/30/74\n500.00\nCarpenters' Legislative Improvement League\n101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.\nPolitical Educational Fund of the Building\nWashington, DC 20001\n5/8/74\n500.00\n& Construction Trades Department\nIBEW-COPE\n815 16th Street, N.W. Room 603\n1125 15th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/28/74\n300.00\nWashington, DC 20005\n5/6/74\n250.00\nTextile Workers Union of America\nAction Committee on Rural Electrification\nPolitical Fund\n(ACRE)\n99 University Place\nP.O. Box 19066\nNew York, NY 20003\n10/28/74\n250.00\nWashington, DC\n5/8/74\n500.00\nLaborers' Political League\nPolitical Fund Committee\n905 16th Street, N.W.\nAmerican Postal Workers Union\nWashington, DC 20006\n5/3/74\n500.00\n817 14th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n3/22/74\n200.00\nEngineers' Political Education Committee\n(EPEC)\nEngineers Political Education Committee (EPEC)\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n5/1/74\n250.00\nWashington, DC 20005\n3/7/74\n250.00\nPolitical Fund Committee\nIBEW-COPE\nAmerican Postal Workers Union\n1125 15th Street, N.W.\n817 14th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n3/1/74\n300.00\nWashington, DC 20005\n5/3/74\n200.00\nTEMPO Fund\nNational Education Association\nAmerican Federation of Musicians\nPolitical Action Committee\n641 Lexington Avenue\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nNew York, NY 10022\n8/30/74\n250.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n8/1/74\n400.00\n32\n33\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nJohn Brademas\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\n(D) Indiana\nSFAD\n(cont'd)\nTed Risenhoover\nDRIVE Political Fund Chapter 886\n675 Fourth Avenue\nDetroit, Michigan\n8/16/74\n750.00\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n(D) Oklahoma\n10/19/74\n500.00\n(cont'd)\nAction Committee for Rural Electrification\nNational Education Association\n(ACRE)\nPolitical Action Committee\nP.O. Box 19066\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/24/74\n400.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/22/74\n100.00\nOperating Engineers #627 Voluntary\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers\nPolitical Fund\nWorkmen of North America - COPE\n1315 S. 73rd East Ave.\n2800 North Sheridan Road\nChicago, IL 60657\nTulsa, OK 74112\n10/24/74\n500.00\n10/11/74\n300.00\nActive Ballot Club, Retail Clerks Inter.\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Comm.\n1775 K Street, N.W.\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\n10/24/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20006\nWashington, DC 20001\n9/5/74\n250.00\nCOPE AFL-CIO\nLaborers Political League\n815 16th Street, N.W.\n905 16th Street, N.W.\n10/24/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20006\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/11/74\n1,000.00\nUnited Steelworkers Political Action Fund\nTransportation Political Education League\n5 Gateway Center\n15401 Detroit Ave.\nCleveland, OH 44107\n10/24/74\n500.00\nPittsburgh, PA 15222\n9/18/74\n1,000.00\nUAW V Cap\nNational Education Association Political Action\n8000 East Jefferson\nComm.\nDetroit, MI 48214\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\n9/27/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/24/74\n500.00\nRailway Clerks Political League\n6300 River Road\nMEBA Political Action Fund Regular Acct.\nRosemont, IL 60018\n17 Battery Place\n4/8/74\n1,000.00\nNew York, NY 10004\n10/24/74\n500.00\nIndustrial Union Department Voluntary Fund\nAFL-CIO\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\n815 16th Street, N.W.\n(General Fund)\nWashington, DC 20006\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\n4/23/74\n500.00\n10/24/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20036\nLocal Union #364, Political Education Fund\n2405 E. Edison Road, P.O. Box 6128\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers Workmen\nSouth Bend, Indiana 46615\nof North America - COPE Acct.\n5/20/74\n400.00\n2800 North Sheridan Road\n200.00\nAFL-CIO Citizenship Fund\nChicago, IL 60657\n10/24/74\nElkhart County Labor Council\n317 W. Lexington\nUAW V Cap\nElkhart, Indiana 46514\n8000 E. Jefferson\n5/16/74\n350.00\n10/24/74\n200.00\nDetroit, MI 48214\nUAW V Cap\n8000 East Jefferson\nILGWU Campaign Committee\nDetroit, MI 48214\n1710 Broadway\n5/22/74\n550.00\nNew York, NY 10010\n10/24/74\n250.00\nTotal\n$18,700.00\nCommittee on Political Education AFL-CIO\nTed Risenhoover\nAFL-CIO\nPolitical Contribution Committee\n(D) Oklahoma\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/24/74\n2,000.00\nCOPE\nWashington, DC\n9/14/74\n3,250.00\n34\n35\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nTed Risenhoover\nWilliam Lehman\nSEIU COPE Fund\nU.A. Political Education Committee\n(D) Oklahoma\n(United Assoc. of Journeymen & Apprentices\n(D) Florida\n900 17th St., N.W.\n2/7/74\n500.00\n(cont'd)\nof the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry\n(cont'd)\nWashington, DC\nof the U.S. and Canada)\nEngineers Political Education Committee\nTulsa, OK\n11/16/74\n500.00\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\n8/5/74\n250.00\nWashington, DC\nActive Ballot Club\nWashington, DC\n11/16/74\n500.00\nPolitical Action Committee\nAmerican Postal Workers\nGWA Cope Fund\nWashington, DC\n817 14th St., N.W.\n50.00\n11/5/74\n300.00\n8/9/74\nWashington, DC\nUAW V. CAP\nTulsa, OK\nTransportation Political Education League\n12/9/74\n500.00\n15401 Detroit Ave.\n8/16/74\n500.00\nAction Comm. for R.E. (ACRE)\nCleveland, Ohio\nWashington, DC\n12/24/74\n750.00\nCarpenters Legislative Impv. Comm.\nLaborers Political League\n101 Constitution Ave.\n9/5/74\n400.00\n905 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20001\nWashington, DC 20006\n12/26/74\n$ 250.00\nIBEW Committee on Political Education\nCWA COPE PCC\n1125 15th St., N.W.\n9/5/74\n100.00\n1925 K Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\nWashington, DC 20006\n12/30/74\n1,000.00\nSWA Committee on Political Education\nMEBA Political Action Fund\n9125 K St., N.W.\n9/5/74\n1,000.00\n17 Battery Place\nWashington, DC 20006\nNew York, NY 10004\n12/30/74\n2,500.00\nRailway Clerks Political League\nCarpenters Legislative Comm.\n6300 River Road\n9/5/74\n1,000.00\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nRosemont, IL 60018\nWashington, DC 20001\n12/30/74\n500.00\nNational Education Assoc. Political\nDRIVE Political Action Fund\nAction Comm.\nDetroit, MI\n1201 16th St., N.W.\n9/16/74\n9/5/74\n500.00\n750.00\nWashington, DC 20036\nTotal\n$18,600.00\nTransportation Political Education League\n15401 Detroit Ave.\n9/5/74\n500.00\nWilliam Lehman\nCleveland, Ohio\nUAW V. CAP\n(D) Florida\n8000 E. Jefferson\nUAW V. CAP\nDetroit, MI 48214\n11/8/74\n500.00\n8000 E. Jefferson\n8/26/74\n1,000.00\nDetroit, MI\nAmerican Federation of Teachers\nCommittee on Political Education\nIBEW COPE Fund\n1012 14th St., N.W.\n1125 15th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/15/74\n8/26/74\n200.00\n250.00\nWashington, DC 20005\nFiremen & Oilers Political League Comm.\nSeafarers Political Activity Comm.\n200 Maryland Ave., N.E.\n675 Fourth Ave.\nWashington, DC\n8/26/74\n500.00\n10/24/74\n100.00\nBrooklyn, NY\nComm. on Political Education AFL-CIO\nIndustrial Union Dep. Volunteer Fund\n816 16th Street, N.W.\n815 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n1/25/74\n8/26/74\n500.00\n1,000.00\nWashington, DC\n37\n36\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nWilliam Lehman\nRural Electric Political Action Comm.\nWilliam Lehman\nPolitical Fund Comm. American Postal Workers\n(D) Florida\nP.O. Box 19066\n(D) Florida\n817 14th St., N.W.\n(cont'd)\n8/28/74\nWashington, DC\n9/25/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC\n500.00\n(cont'd)\nCarpenters Legislative Improv. Comm.\nIBEW COPE\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\n1125 15th St., N.W.\n9/25/74\n150.00\nWashington, DC\n8/29/74\nWashington, DC\n600.00\nLaborers Political League\nActive Ballot Club\n905 16th St., N.W.\n1775 K St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/3/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC\n9/17/74\n500.00\nMEBA Political Action Fund\nAmalgamated Political Education Comm.\n17 Battery Place\n15 Union Square\nNew York, NY\n10/3/74\n300.00\nNew York, NY 10004\n9/19/74\n1,000.00\nILGWU Campaign Committee\nIndustrial Union Dep. Voluntary Funds\n1710 Broadway\n815 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/3/74\n250.00\nNew York, NY 10019\n9/19/74\n250.00\nCOPE - TIGER\nUnited Steelworkers of America\n1809 Brickell Ave. CTA Towers\nPolitical Action Fund\nMiami, FL\n9/19/74\n2 Gateway Center\n50.00\nPittsburgh, PA 15222\n10/7/74\n1,000.00\nTransportation Political Education League\n15401 Detroit Ave.\nUAW V. CAP\nCleveland, Ohio\n9/20/74\n8000 E. Jefferson\n300.00\n500.00\nDetroit, MI 48214\n10/7/74\nHotel & Restaurant Employees TIP\n120 E 4th St.\nTotal\n$18,550.00\nCincinnati, Ohio\n9/20/74\n750.00\nCarpenters Legislative Improv. Comm.\nLeo Zeferetti\nSeafarer's Political Activity Fund\n100 Constitution Ave., N.W.\n(D) New York\n675 4th Ave.,\nWashington, DC\nBrooklyn, New York 11232\nNo Date\n1,000.00\n9/23/74\n300.00\nBoilermakers-Blacksmiths Legislative Education\nBrooklyn Longshoreman's Political Action\nAction Program LEAP\n(in kind\n& Educational Fund\n401 1st St., N.W.\ncont.)\n343 Court Street\nWashington, DC\n500.00\nBrooklyn, New York 11231\n10/25/74\n3,687.96\n9/23/74\nState & County Municipal - COPE\nCommunications Workers of Amer. Local 1109\n1155 15th St., N.W.\nCope Fund\nWashington, DC\n9/25/74\n250.00\n17 Neptune Avenue\n10/25/74\n300.00\nBrooklyn, NY\nCWA COPE PCC\n1925 K St., NW\nAFL-CIO Committee on Political Education\nWashington, DC\n9/25/74\n815 16th St., N.W.\n1,000.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/25/74\n3,000.00\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nLaborers Political League\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n905 16th St., N.W.\n9/25/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/28/74\n500.00\nLaborers Political League\nMachinist Non-Partisan Political Activity Fund\n905 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\n9/25/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/28/74\n300.00\n38\n39\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nAMOUNT\nPolitical Action Committee Fund, Painters\nJames O'Hara\nLeo Zeferetti\nDistrict, Council No. 22\nMEBA District Voluntary Action Fund\n50.00\n(D) Michigan\n(D) New York\n22655 South Chrysler Dr.\n9/30/74\n650 4th Ave.\n(cont'd)\n(cont'd)\nHazelPark, MI 48030\nBrooklyn, NY\n10/31/74\n1,500.00\nLakeshore Federation of Teachers\nRailway Clerks Political League\n200.00\n29103 Harper\n10/7/74\n6300 River Road\nSt. Clair Shores, MI 48080\nRosemont, IL 60018\n10/31/74\n300.00\nUAW V CAP\nRetail Clerks Union - Local #888\n10/7/74\n1,000.00\n8000 East Jefferson\nActive Ballot Club\nDetroit, MI 48214\n229 Park Ave.,\nNew York, NY\n11/22/74\n500.00\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nService Employees Int'l\nGeneral Fund\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\n150.00\n10/8/74\nUnion Cope Fund\n900 17th Street\nWashington, DC 20361\nWashington, DC\n11/1/74\n250.00\nSEIU COPE Fund\n250.00\n900 17th Street, N.W.\n6/13/74\nTransportation Workers Union-COPE Fund\nLocal 100\nWashington, DC 20006\n1980 Broadway\n10/28/74\nNational Education Assoc.\nNew York, NY 10023\n925.00\nPolitical Action Committee\n7/10/74\n500.00\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nBrooklyn Longshoremens Political Action and\nEducation Fund\nWashington, DC 20036\n343 Court St.\nIndustrial Union Dept. Voluntary Funds\nBrooklyn, NY 11231\n10/25/74\n300.00\n500.00\n815 16th St., N.W.\n5/6/74\nAFL-CIO Committee on Political Education\nWashington, DC 20006\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nCarpenters' Legislative Improvement\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/18/74\n2,500.00\nCommittee 101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\n7/26/74\n600.00\nTotal\n$15,062.96\nWashington, DC 20001\nMarine Engineers' Beneficial Assoc.\nJames O'Hara\nPolitical Education Fund of the Building\nPolitical Action Fund\n(D) Michigan\n& Construction Trades Dept.\n400 First St., N.W. - Suite 700\n8/2/74\n1,000.00\n815 16th St., N.W. - Suite 603\nWashington, DC 20001\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/29/74\n300.00\nSeafarers Political Activity\nRailway Clerks Political League\n675 Fourth Avenue\n9/27/74\n500.00\n6300 River Road\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\nRosemont, IL 60018\n10/29/74\n500.00\nPACE - Political Action for Cooperative\nBricklayer's Action Committee\n815 15th St., N.W.\nEffectiveness 888 17th St., N.W.- Suite 700\n9/30/74\n300.00\nWashington, DC 20005\n11/7/74\n200.00\nWashington, DC 20006\nCommittee on Political Education\nCommittee on Political Education - AFL-CIO\nAFL-CIO\n1034 North Washington Ave.\n10/1/74\n2,000.00\n815 16th St., N.W.\nLansing, MI 48906\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/12/74\n100.00\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen\nPolitical Action Committee, Int'l Union,\nof North America - COPE Acct.\n10/3/74\n500.00\nUnited Plant Guard Wkrs, of America\n2800 North Sheridan Road\nKelly Road, Roseville, MI 48066\n9/25/74\n250.00\nChicago, IL 60657\n41\n40\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nJames O'Hara\nAction Committee for Rural Electrification\nJames O'Hara\nGreater Detroit Building Trades Council\n(D) Michigan\nP.O. Box 70 - 319 North Lake St.\n(cont'd)\nBoyne City, MI 49712\n500.00\n(D) Michigan\n10800 Puritan\n10/7/74\n(cont'd)\nDetroit, MI\n10/15/74\n100.00\nNational Education Assoc. PAC\nUtica Education Association\n1201 Sixteenth St., N.W.\nPAC\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/7/74\n500.00\nUtica, MI\n10/16/74\n100.00\nAmerican Federation of Teachers\nRoseville Federation of Teachers COPE\nCommittee on Political Education\n17063 East Ten Mile Road\nMillion Dollar Fund\nEast Detroit, MI 48021\n10/31/74\n25.00\n1012 14th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n10/10/74\n250.00\nCentral Macomb Political Education Council\n37 Church Street\nLaborer's Political League\nMount Clemens, MI 48043\n11/14/74\n100.00\n8550 West Bryn Mawr Ave.\nChicago, IL 60631\n10/10/74\n1,000.00\nTotal\n$14,300.00\nNMU-PLOW - National Maritime Union\nPolitical & Legislative Organization on Watch\nPhillip Burton\nUnited Steel Workers, Political\n346 West 17th St.\n(D) California\nAction Committee\nNew York, NY 10011\n10/15/74\n500.00\n5 Gateway Center\nPittsburgh, PA 15222\n10/31/74\n200.00\nILGWU Campaign Committee\n1710 Broadway\nILGWU Campaign Committee\nNew York, NY 10019\n10/15/74\n250.00\n1710 Broadway\nNew York, NY 10019\n10/31/74\n200.00\nAmalgamated Political Education Committee\n15 Union Square\nCWA-COPE PCC\nNew York, NY 10003\n10/17/74\n400.00\n1925 K Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/31/74\n300.00\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Comm.\n101 Constitution Ave.\nHotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders\nWashington, DC 20001\n10/18/74\n300.00\nInt'l Union COPE - PAC\n120 E. 4th Street\nTextile Workers Union of America,\nCincinnati, Ohio 45202\n10/28/74\n500.00\nPolitical Fund\n99 University Place\nBuilding & Construction Trades Dept.\nNew York, NY 10003\n10/18/74\n250.00\nPAC Political Education Fund\n815 16th Street\nCWA-COPE-PCC\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/31/74\n400.00\n1925 K Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/21/74\n200.00\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen\nof North America - COPE\nActive Ballot Club\n2800 North Sheridan Road\n2550 West Grand Blvd.\n10/21/74\n500.00\nChicago, IL 60657\n11/1/74\n500.00\nDetroit, MI\nAFL-CIO COPE\nPort Huron Education Assoc. COPE\n815 16th Street, N.W.\n411 Quay'\nPort Huron, MI 48060\n150.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/6/74\n150.00\n10/21/74\nMM & P - PAF\nActive Ballot Club\n2550 West Grand Blvd.\n1910 Sunderland Place, N.W.\nDetroit, MI\n10/16/74\n250.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n12/12/74\n1,000.00\nCommittee on Federal Employee\nRomeo Ed. Assoc. - PAC\nPolitical Education\n11492 Crestline Drive\n1325 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.\nRomeo, MI 48060\n10/7/74\n25.00\nWashington, DC\nmissing\n250.00\n42\n43\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nPhilip Burton\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Committee\nPhilip Burton\nSupporters of Engineers #3 SELFEC\n(D) California\nUnited Brotherhood of Carpenters\n(D) California\nOperating Engineers Local #3\n(cont'd)\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\n(cont'd)\n474 Valencia St.\nWashington, DC 20001\n2/11/74\n500.00\nSan Francisco, CA 94103\n1/17/74\n500.00\nInt'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers\nSheet Metal Workers Int'l Union\n1125 15th Street, N.W.\nPolitical Action League\nWashington, DC 20005\n2/4/74\n250.00\n100 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n2/23/74\n500.00\nILGWU Campaign Committee\nInt'l Ladies Garment Workers Union\nPolitical Action Together\n1710 Broadway\nc/o Int'l Brotherhood of Painters\nNew York, NY 10019\n1/30/74\n250.00\n1750 New York Ave.\nWashington, DC 20006\n3/12/74\n500.00\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\n8130 Baldwin Street\nAmalgamated Political Education Comm.\nOakland, CA 94621\n2/15/74\n500.00\n15 Union Square\nNew York, NY 10003\n3/12/74\n400.00\nMaintenance of Way Political League\n12050 Woodward Ave.\nMEBA Political Action Fund\nDetroit, MI\n2/11/74\n250.00\n17 Battery Place\nNew York, NY 10004\n7/18/74\nPacific Coast Marine Firemen O.W. & W. Assn.\n1,000.00\nMarine Firemens Union\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Comm.\n240 2nd Street\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nSan Francisco, CA 94105\n1/30/74\n200.00\nWashington, DC 20001\n10/3/74\n600.00\nTEMPO Fund\nMarine Cooks & Stewards Voluntary Defense Fund\nAmerican Federation of Musicians\n350 Fremont Street\n641 Lexington Avenue\nSan Francisco, CA 94105\n10/24/74\nNew York, NY 10022\n2/20/74\n250.00\n150.00\nIBEW - COPE\nFighting Fund Comm. for NMU Members\n1125 15th St., N.W.\nNMU of America\nWashington, DC 20005\n10/24/74\n250.00\n36 7th Avenue\nNew York, NY 10011\n1/30/74\n500.00\nMoldors & Allied Workers Political Fund\n1225 E. McMillan St.\nOperating Engineers Political\nCincinnati, OH 45206\n10/24/74\n200.00\nEducation Committee\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\nTotal\n$13,050.00\nWashington, DC\n2/4/74\n500.00\nSPAD-Seafarers Int'l Union of N.A.\nDominick Daniels\nMachinist Non-Partisan League\n675 4th Avenue\n(D) New Jersey\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n2/20/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC\n11/1/74\n$ 250.00\nSIEU COPE Fund\nLetter Carriers' Fund\nService Employees Int'l Union\nc/o S. Rademacher\n900 17th Street, NW\n100 Indiana Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n2/11/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC\n11/1/74\n500.00\nUnited Auto Workers Voluntary CAP Fund\nUnited Steel Workers\n8000 E. Jefferson\nPolitical Action Fund\nDetroit, MI 48214\n2/20/74\n750.00\nWashington, DC\n12/16/74\n750.00\nTransportation Political Education League\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers'\nUnited Transportation Union\nWorkmen of North America-COPE acct.\n15401 Detroit Avenue\n2800 N. Sheridan Road,\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n2/11/74\n500.00\nChicago, IL 60657\n10/23/74\n500.00\n44\n45\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nDominick Daniels\nIndustrial Union Dept.\n(D) New Jersey\nVolunteer Funds\nDominick Daniels\nN. J. State Carpenters Non-Partisan\n(cont'd)\n815 16th Street, N.W.\n(D) New Jersey\nPolitical Committee\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/4/74\n500.00\n(cont'd)\nR.F.D. #1\nLafayette, NJ 87849\n10/13/74\n300.00\nCommunications Workers of America\nCommittee on Political Education\nRetail Store Employees Union\n355 Chestnut Street\nLocal 1262 Active Ballot Club General Fund\nUnion, NJ 07083\n4/29/74\n250.00\n1309 Broad Street\nClifton, NJ 07013\n10/23/74\n200.00\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\n674 Fourth Avenue\nUnited Steel Workers of America\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n4/29/74\n500.00\nPolitical Action Fund\nWashington, 6, DC\n10/23/74\n750.00\nEngineers Political Education Committee\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\nEducational and COPE Fund of Local 284\nWashington, DC 20036\n5/17/74\n250.00\nLaundry Workers, Cleaners & Dyers Union\n4/16/74\n50.00\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Committee\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nN. J. Teamsters Drive\nWashington, DC 20001\n5/28/74\n750.00\n591 Summit Avenue\nJersey City, NJ\n4/30/74\n750.00\nFire Fighters COPE\n905 16th Street, N.W.\nSeafarers Political Donation\nWashington, DC 20006\n6/7/74\n$ 300.00\n675 4th Ave.\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n9/25/74\n500.00\nPeople Qualified Contribution Comm.\nAFSCME\nCommittee on Political Education AFL-CIO\nP.O. Box 6587\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/11/74\n1,000.00\nWashington, DC 20009\n7/12/74\n200.00\nContribution in Kind-500 10c Stamps\nNational Federation of Federal Employees\nAmerican Postal Workers Union\nPublic Affairs Council\nPolitical Fund Committee\n1737 H Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/29/74\n50.00\n817 14th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n7/26/74\n50.00\nPolitical Education Fund of the Building\nMarine Engineers Beneficial Assn.\n& Construction Trades Dept.\nPolitical Action Fund\n815 16th Street, N.W. Room 603\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/30/74\n400.00\n17 Battery Place\nNew York, NY 10004\n8/16/74\n1,500.00\nSIEU COPE Fund\nRailway Clerks Political League\n900 17th Street\n6300 River Road\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/16/74\n250.00\nRosemont, IL 60018\n8/23/74\n500.00\nILGWU Campaign Comm\nTotal\n$12,550.00\n1710 Broadway\nNew York, NY 10019\n10/16/74\n250.00\nGeorge Miller\nOil Chemical Atomic Workers Political\nTWUA Political Fund\n(D) California\n& Legislative League-Voluntary Fund\n99 University Ave.\nDenver, Colorado\n10/28/74\n550.00\nNew York, NY\n10/24/74\n250.00\nUnited Steelworkers of America\nLaborers Political League\nPolitical Action Fund\n905 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20016\n9/27/74\n1,000.00\n5 Gateway Center\nPittsburg, CA 94565\n10/28/74\n500.00\n46\n47\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nGeorge Miller\nNational Education Assoc. Political\nGeorge Miller\nCWA COPE-PCC\n(D) California\nAction Comm.\n(D) California\n1925 K Street, N.W.\n(cont'd)\n1201 16th St., N.W.\n(cont'd)\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/1/74\n200.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n8/16/74\n500.00\nCommittee on Political Education AFL-CIO\nMEBA Political Action Fund\n815 16th St., N.W.\n17 Battery\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/1/74\n500.00\nNew York, NY 10004\n7/11/74\n250.00\nTransportation Political Education League\nCarpenters' Legislative Improvement Comm.\n14600 Detroit Ave.,\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n11/6/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20001\n8/6/74\n500.00\nCarpenters Political Action Fund\nTransportation Political Education League\n995 Market, St., Suite 1460\n15401 Detroit Ave.\nSan Francisco, CA 94103\n11/6/74\n200.00\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n7/29/74\n500.00\nActive Ballot Club-Retail Clerks Int'l Assoc.\nTotal\n$12,000.00\n1775 K Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n12/27/74\n500.00\nTim Hall\nUnited Transportation Union\n(D) Illinois\nc/o Thomas J. Duggan\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\n330 S. Wells St.\n675 4th Avenue\nChicago, IL 60606\n10/25/74\n300.00\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n9/11/74\n500.00\nILGWU Campaign Committee\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nc/o Morris Bialis, V.P.\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\n1710 Broadway\nWashington, DC 20036\n9/16/74\n1,000.00\nNew York, NY 10019\n10/28/74\n250.00\nUnited Auto Workers V. Cap\nBuilding & Construction Trades Dept,\n8000 E. Jefferson\nPolitical Education Fund\nDetroit, MI 48214\n10/10/74\n1,500.00\n815 16th St., N.W. Rm 603\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/25/74\n200.00\nService Employees Int'l Union-COPE Fund\n900 17th St., N.W.\nUAW V. CAP\n9/19/74\n1,000.00\n11/1/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20009\n8000 E. Jefferson\nDetroit, MI\n9/24/74\n1,800.00\nCommittee on Political Education COPE\n815 16th St., N.W.\nCWA COPE APCC\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/2/74\n2,000.00\n1925 K St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/4/74\n100.00\nLaborers Political League\n905 16th St., N.W.\nActive Ballot Club\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/10/74\n500.00\n1775 K. St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n8/23/74\n500.00\nNational Maritime Union-Political & Legislative\nOrganization on Watch\nUnited Steelworkers of America\n346 West 17th St.\nPolitical Action Fund\nNew York, NY 10011\n10/15/74\n250.00\nWashington, DC\n9/13/74\n500.00\nCWA COPE PCC\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\n1925 K Street, N.W.\nGeneral Fund\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/15/74\n300.00\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n9/30/74\n500.00\nInternational Ladies Garment Workers Union\nCampaign Committee\nCOPE AFL-CIO\n1710 Broadway\n815 16th St. N.W.\nNew York, NY 10019\n10/21/74\n250.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/16/74\n2,500.00\n49\n48\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nTim Hall\nService Employees Int'l Union AFL-CIO\n(D) Illinois\n509 South Wabash Ave.\nWilliam Ford\nCommittee on Federal Employees\n(cont'd)\nChicago, IL\n9/16/74\n250.00\n(D) Michigan\nPolitical Education\n(cont'd)\nWashington, DC\n8/15/74\n500.00\nCOPE AFL-CIO\n815 16th St., N.W.\nSheet Metal Workers' Int'l Assoc.\nWashington, DC 20006\n7/5/74\n2,500.00\nPolitical Action League\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\nUAW V. CAP\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/17/74\n300.00\n8000 E. Jefferson\nDetroit, MI 48214\n10/9/74\n500.00\nSEIU COPE Fund - PCC\n900 17th St., N.W.\nUnited Steelworkers of America\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/17/74\n500.00\nLewis Center\n615 East Michigan St.\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher\nMilwaukee, WI\n10/15/74\n500.00\nWorkmen of North America\n2800 N. Sheridan Rd.\nIBEW-COPE\nChicago, ILL 60657\n10/8/74\n500.00\n1125 15th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\n10/22/74\n250.00\nNat'l. Ed. Assoc. PAC\n1201 16th St., N.W.\nTotal\n$11,150.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/22/74\n200.00\nTextile Workers Union of America\nWilliam Ford\nCarpenters' Legislative Improvement Comm.\nAFL-CIO & CLC\n(D) Michigan\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\n99 University Place\nWashington, DC\n7/1/74\n750.00\nNew York, NY 10003\nSol Stetin, General President\nPatrick J. Nilars, Treas. Political Action\n10/22/74\n250.00\nFund American Postal Workers Union\nMichigan Doctors Political Action Comm.\n817 14th St., N.W.\nBox 769\nWashington, DC\n7/12/74\n250.00\nEast Lansing, MI\n7/12/74\n800.00\nC. M. McIntosh, Treas., Railway Labor\nJoseph D. Kennan, IBEW-COPE\nExecutives Assn. Political League\n1125 15th St., N.W.\n4/10/74\n200.00\n400 First St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20005\nWashington, DC\n7/12/74\n200.00\n7/17/74\n250.00\nHal C. Davis, Pres.\nTransportation Political Education League\n15401 Detroit Ave.\nAmerican Fed. of Musicians\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n641 Lexington Ave.\n7/18/74\n500.00\nNew York, NY\n7/12/74\n250.00\nAction Committee for Rural Electrification\nP.O. Box 19066\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation, SPAD\nWashington, DC\n674 Fourth Ave.\n7/18/74\n500.00\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n4/17/74\n500.00\nLaborers' Political League\n905 16th St., N.W. - 5th Floor\nEngineers Political Education Comm.\nWashington, DC 20006\n1125 17th St., N.W.\n10/14/74\n1,000.00\nWashington, DC\n5/28/74\n250.00\nMEBA Political Action Fund\n17 Battery Place\nILGWU\nNew York, NY 10004\n1710 Broadway\n7/26/74\n1,000.00\nNew York, NY 10019\n7/26/74\n200.00\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\n675 Fourth Ave.\nAmerican Federation of Teachers\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\nCommittee on Political Education\n8/22/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC\n8/15/74\n250.00\n50\n51\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nWilliam Ford\nAmerican Postal Workers Union\nMario Biaggi\nBrooklyn Longshoremans Political Action\n(D) Michigan\nDetroit Local - Suite 516\n(D) New York\n& Education Fund\n(cont'd)\n1200 Sixth Ave.\n(cont'd)\n143 Court St.\nDetroit, MI\n4/10/74\n300.00\nBrooklyn, NY\n9/27/74\n200.00\nMichigan Federation of Teachers\nNMU - PLOW\n14625 Greenfield\n346 W. 17th St.\nDetroit, MI\n4/10/74\n150.00\nNew York, NY 10011\n9/27/74\n100.00\nUAW V. CAP\nLocal 1-2 Utility Workers Union of Amer.\n8000 E. Jefferson\nCOPE\nDetroit, MI 48214\n4/18/74\n500.00\n386 Park Ave. So.\nNew York, NY\n9/25/74\n200.00\nTotal\n$10,650.00\nUFT - COPE\n260 Park Ave. So.\nMario Biaggi\nMEBA & AFL-CIO - Dist. #2\nNew York, NY\n10/2/74\n300.00\n(D) New York\nVoluntary Political Action Fund\n650 4th Ave.\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n11/5/74\n1,000.00\nThomas McGuire, Pres. & Bus. Mgr.\nLocal 15- 245 N. 14 St., NY, NY\n2780 University Ave.\nActive Ballot Club\nBronx, NY 10464\n9/20/74\n100.00\nRetail Clerks Union\n299 Park Ave.\nNew York, NY 10003\n11/5/74\n250.00\nJohn Tierney, Sec-Treas. Lathers Union\n2500 University Ave.\n1322 3rd Ave.\nBronx, NY\nNY, NY\n9/24/74\n100.00\nUnited Cement Masons Local 780\n178 E 85th Street\nBronx, NY\n11/20/74\n100.00\nSEIU COPE Fund\n900 17th St.\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/9/74\n250.00\nILGWU\nCampaign Committee\n1710 Broadway\nHotel & Rest. Employee Union\nNew York, NY 10019\n10/28/74\n200.00\n120 E. 4th St.\nNew York, NY\n9/15/74\n500.00\nInt'l Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Traders\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\nComm. on Federal Employers Political Education\nWashington, DC\n1/12/74\n500.00\n1325 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n9/15/74\n100.00\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\n674 4th Ave.\nNMU Political & Legislative Organization Watch\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n1/22/74\n500.00\n346 W. 17th St.\nNew York, NY\n10/15/74\n250.00\nEngineers Political Education Comm.\nTransportation Political Education League\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n6/18/74\n250.00\n15431 Detroit Ave.\nCleveland, Ohio\n10/3/74\n500.00\nRailways Clerks Political League\nTotal\n$ 7,400.00\n6300 River Road\nRosemont, IL 60018\n7/1/74\n500.00\nLaborers' Political League\nJoseph Gaydos\nPolitical Education Fund of the Building\n905 16th Street, N.W.\n(D) Pennsylvania\n& Construc. Trades Dept.\nWashington, DC 20006\n7/23/74\n500.00\n815 16th St., N.W. - Room 603\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/1/74\n300.00\nMEBA Political Action Fund\nActive Ballot Club\n17 Battery Place\nNew York, NY\n9/20/74\n1,000.00\n1775 K St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n12/4/74\n250.00\n52\n53\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nJoseph Gaydos\nMEBA Political Action Fund\nIke Andrews\nActive Ballot Club\n(D) Pennsylvania\n17 Battery Place\n(cont'd)\n1775 K St., N.W.\n(cont'd)\nNew York, NY 10004\n12/27/74\n1,000.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/5/74\n250.00\nUnited Auto Workers V. CAP\nTransportation Political Ed. League\n6000 E. Jefferson\n14600 Detroit Ave.\n11/1/74\n300.00\nDetroit, MI 48214\n9/23/74\n300.00\nCleveland, Ohio 44107\n11/5/74\n300.00\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen\nEngineers Political Ed. Comm.\nof N.A.\n1125 17th St., N.W.\n2800 N. Sheridan Road\nWashington, DC 20036\n11/1/74\n250.00\nChicago, IL 60657\n10/22/74\n300.00\nIBEW - COPE\nNMU-PLOW\nChicago, IL 60618\n11/1/74\n200.00\n326 W. 17th Street\nNew York, NY 10011\n10/22/74\n250.00\nIBEW Comm on Pol Education\n1125 15th St., N.W.\nTWUA Political Fund\nWashington, DC 20005\n10/24/74\n100.00\n99 University Place\nNew York, NY 10003\n10/22/74\n250.00\nNMU Political & Legislative Org. on Watch\n346 West 17th St.\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\nNew York, NY 10011\n10/24/74\n250.00\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/24/74\n250.00\nOCAW Political & Legislative League Vol.\nFund\nSeafarers Political Activity Donation\nP.O. Box 2812\n674 4th Avenue\n500.00\nDenver, Colorado 80201\n10/21/74\nBrooklyn, NY 11232\n3/25/74\n300.00\nPublic Employees Organized to Promote\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Comm.\nLegislative Equality\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nP.O. Box 6587\nWashington, DC 20001\n4/1/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20009\n10/17/74\n100.00\nLaborers Political League\nAction Comm. for Rural Electrification\n605 16th St., N.W.\nP.O. Box 19066\nWashington, DC 20006\n4/4/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC\nnot given\n500.00\nEngineers Political Education Comm.\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Comm.\n1125 17th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n5/20/74\n250.00\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20001\nnot given\n500.00\nUnited Steelworkers of America\nCommittee on Political Education AFL-CIO\n5 Gateway Center\nPittsburgh, PA 15222\n8/27/74\n1,500.00\n815 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\nnot given\n1,000.00\nILGWU Campaign Committee\nNational Education Assoc. PAC\n1710 Broadway\nNew York, NY 10019\n8/2/74\n300.00\n1201 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\nnot given\n1,000.00\nTotal\n$6,450.00\nTotal\n$ 6,250.00\nIke Andrews\nCarolinas DRIVE Chapter 1\n10/30/74\n500.00\n(D-North Carolina)\nGreensboro, NC\n11/26/74\n500.00\nEdward Beard\nActive Ballot Club\nSheet Metal Workers Int'l Assoc.\n(D-Rhode Island)\nSuffridge Bldg.\nPAL\nPatrick Hall - Secy Treas.\n1750 New York Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n11/9/74\n500.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/4/74\n200.00\n54\n55\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nEdward Beard\nBoilermakers Local #29\nPatsy Mink\nJack Kanno, UPW, Local 646\n(Cont'd)\nLEAP Committee\n(D) Hawaii\nAFSCME, AFL-CIO\nSamuel Cerino - James Dunne\n(cont'd)\n1426 N. School St.\nMassachusetts\n11/9/74\n100.00\nHonolulu, HA 96817\n11/6/74\n25.00\nAFL-CIO Comm. on Political Education\nJames T. Housewright, President\n815 16th St., N.W.\nActive Ballot Club, Retail Credit Int'l Assoc.\nWashington, DC\n10/25/74\n1,000.00\n1775 K Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/6/74\n250.00\nNational People Committee\nAFSCME\nPolitical Action Committee for Education\nP.O. Box 6587\n1649 Kalakua Avenue, Room 208\nWashington, DC 20009\n11/9/74\n250.00\nHonolulu, HA 96814\n9/18/74\n35.00\nService Employees Int'l Union\nJohn K. Cabral\nCOPE Fund PCC\n2305 S. Beretania\n900 17th St., N.W.\n(Nat'l Rep. Amer. Fed. Gov't. Emp.-AFL-CIO)\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/9/74\n200.00\nHonolulu, HA 96814\n2/4/74\n175.00\nMNU - PLOW\nHawaii Boilermakers Lodge 204, LEAP Fund\n346 West 17th Street\n555 Paiea Street\nNew York, NY 10011\n10/20/74\n250.00\nHonolulu, HA 96819\n2/8/74\n350.00\nTWVA Political Fund\nMarine Cooks & Stewards\n99 University Place\nVoluntary Defense Fund\nNew York 3, NY\n10/20/74\n250.00\n350 Fremont St.\nSan Francisco, CA 94105\n2/20/74\n70.00\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League\n1200 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\nCOPE-Intr. Brotherhood of Elec. Workers\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/20/74\n500.00\n1125 15th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC\n4/28/74\n105.00\nUAW V. CAP\nLeonard Woodcock\nHunter P. Wharton\n8000 E. Jefferson\nEngineers Political Education Committee\nDetroit, MI 45814\n10/21/74\n1,000.00\n1125 17th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n8/15/74\n250.00\nInternational Brotherhood of Painters &\nAllied Trades\nCommittee on Political Education\nMichael Silvestri\nAmalgamated Meat Cutter & Butcher\nWashington, DC 20000\n10/21/74\n1,000.00\nWorkmen of North America\n2800 N. Sheridan Road,\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen\nChicago, IL 60857\n10/1/74\n300.00\n2800 N. Sheridan Road\n(COPE Acc't)\nChicago, IL 60657\n10/22/74\n300.00\nCommittee on Political Education, AFL-CIO\n815 16th Street, N.W.\nTotal\n$ 5,350.00\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/15/74\n1,000.00\nTotal\n$ 3,560.00\nPatsy Mink\nWilliam J. Holayter, Director\n(D) Hawaii\nMachinist Non-Partisan Political League\nGeneral Fund\nRonald Sarasin\nCarpenters Legislative Improv. Comm.\n1300 Connecticut Ave., N.W.\n(R) Connecticut\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n11/6/74\n$ 500.00\nWashington, DC 20001\n8/22/74\n600.00\nUnited Steelworkers of America,\nIUOE Local Union 478\nPolitical Action Fund\n1965 Dixwell Ave.\n5 Gateway Center\nHamden, Conn. 06514\n5/17/74\n750.00\nPittsburgh, PA 15222\n11/6/74\n500.00\n56\n57\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nAlphonzo Bell\nActive Ballot Club\nRonald Sarasin\nMEBA Political Action Fund\n(R) California\nRetail Clerks Int'l - 1775 K St., N.W.\n(R) Connecticut\n17 Battery Place\n(cont'd)\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/1/74\n250.00\n(cont'd)\nNew York, NY\n9/24/74\n1,000.00\nLaborers Political League\nTotal\n$ 2,350.00\n905 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20006\n9/9/74\n500.00\nShirley Chisholm\nMachinists Non-Partisan Political League'\n(D-New York)\nDistrict 15\nCarpenters Legislative Improvement Comm.\n7 E. 15th Street\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nNew York, NY 10003\n11/1/74\n100.00\nWashington, DC 20001\n7/18/74\n600.00\nTransportation Workers Union-Local #100\nEngineers Political Education Committee\nPolitical Contributions Committee\n1125 Seventeenth St., N.W.\n1980 Broadway\nWashington, DC 20036\n5/14/74\n250.00\nNew York, NY 10023\n11/1/74\n925.00\nTotal\n$ 1,900.00\nRetail Store Employees Union Local 1262\nActive Ballot Club\n1389 Broad St.,\nMarvin Esch\nSchool Alliance Political Act. Comm.\nClifton, NJ 07013\n11/1/74\n200.00\n(R-Michigan)\n3847 Raleigh Drive\nOkemos, MI 48864\n10/17/74\n100.00\nActive Ballot Club of Retail Clerks Int'l\nSuffridge Building\nAnn Arbor Education Association-PAC\nWashington, DC\n11/4/74\n250.00\n2648 Finwick Court\nAnn Arbor, MI 48104\n10/23/74\n500.00\nAM Committee on Political Education,\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters\nNEA - PAC\n2800 N. Sheridan Road\n1201 16th St., N.W.\n10/16/74\n1,000.00\nChicago, IL 60657\n12/16/74\n400.00\nWashington, DC 20036\n9/20/74\n100.00\nEngineers Political Education Committee\nEastern 10 - MEA Political Action Council\n1125 17th St., N.W.\n106 East Main Street\nWashington, DC\n7/19/74\n250.00\nDundee, MI 48131\n10/25/74\n200.00\nTotal\n$ 2,125.00\nTotal\n$ 1,900.00\nAI Quie\nLaborers' Political League\n(R-Minnesota)\n905 16th St., N.W.\nAugustus Hawkins\nCarpenter's Legislative Improvement Committee\nWashington, DC 20006\n11/4/74\n500.00\n(D) California\n101 Constitution Ave., N.W.\nWashington, DC 20001\n5/10/74\n500.00\nNational Education Assoc. Pol. Act. Comm.\n1201 16th St., N.W.\nUnited Steelworkers of America PAC\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/22/74\n1,000.00\nWalter Burke, Secy-Treas.\n5 Gateway Center\nMEBA Political Action Fund\nPittsburgh, PA 15222\n11/8/74\n250.00\n17 Battery Place\nNew York, NY 10004\n10/14/74\n500.00\nPolitical Education Fund of the\nBuilding & Trades Dept.\nTotal\n$ 2,000.00\n815 16th St., N.W. - Room 603\nWashington, DC\n11/8/74\n300.00\nAlphonzo Bell\nPolitical Education Fund of the Building\nAmalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen\n(R) California\n& Trades Dept.\nof North America\n815 16th St., N.W. #603\n2800 North Sheridan Road\nWashington, DC 20006\n10/25/74\n300.00\nChicago, IL 60657\n10/11/74\n100.00\n58\n59\nCANDIDATE\nCONTRIBUTOR\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nAugustus Hawkins\nEngineers Political Education Comm.\n(D) California\nHunter Wharton, Gen. Pres.\n(cont'd)\n1121 17th, N.W.\nWashington, DC\n8/6/74\n250.00\nTotal\n$1,400.00\nJohn Ashbrook\nLaborers Political League\n(R-Ohio)\n905 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/17/74\n500.00\nTotal\n$ 500.00\nBill Goodling\nNational Education Association\n(R) Pennsylvania\nPolitical Action Committee\n1201 16th Street, N.W.\nWashington, DC 20036\n10/7/74\n500.00\nTotal\n$ 500.00\nCarl D. Perkins\nAFL-CIO\n(D) Kentucky\n815 16th St., N.W.\nWashington, DC\n10/24/74\n$ 500.00\nTotal\n$ 500.00\nJohn Buchanan\n(R) Alabama\nNo Union Contributions\nJohn Erlenborn\n(R) Illinois\nNo Union Contributions\nEdwin Eshelman\n(R) Pennsylvania\nNo Union Contributions\nJames Jeffords\n(R) Vermont\nNo Union Contributions\nLarry Pressler\n(R) South Dakota\nNo Union Contributions\nVirginia Smith\n(R) Nebraska\nNo Union Contributions\n60\nFor additional copies and information write:\nTHE NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE\n8316 Arlington Boulevard\nFairfax, Virginia 22030\n[4/7/75]\nto: john vickerman\nwhite house\nJohn, for your info re\nthe beiefing we are going\nto set up. ads also will\nbe running t uesday and\nwednesday on op ed\npage of star.\nGERALD\nR.\nFORD\nLIBRARY\nFrom\nHugh Newton\nC4\nMonday, April7,1975\nTHE WASHINGTON POST\n25 Country Clubs Share $638,00\nASSESS, From C1\nIf the club violates the\ncate for assessments and\nthe use value should be of\nEcker and so\nconsent order or refuses to\ntaxation. \"It's a form of sub-\nthe fair market figure, he\nislators from\nhas increased sharply, while\nenter into one, the attorney\nsidization.\"\nsaid.\nsupported a H\nthe \"use value\" has re-\ngeneral can issue a cease\nHe said the growing dis-\nThus, in Montgomery,\ngates bill at t\nmained virtually the same,\nand desist order to halt the\nparity between the \"fair\nwhen the 20 clubs now re-\nGeneral Assem\nthe tax benefits have soared.\ndiscrimination. Attorneys\nmarket value\" of the golf\nceiving the tax break signed\nthat would ha\ngeneral can revoke the tax\ncourse lands and the \"use\ntheir respective agreements,\nthat use assess\nIn Montgomery, for exam-\nexemption of clubs that\nvalue\" has resulted because\nmost of them in 1966, they\nleast 50 per ce)\nple, 18 clubs drew a $165,777\nbreak this order until the\nthe state law does not tell\npaid taxes on use assess.\nmarket value.\ntax break in 1970, according\nclubs comply with the law.\nassessors how to place a\nments that were an average\n\"I live in my\nto a study prepared for con-\n\"The country clubs have\nvalue on the \"use\" of fair-\nof 54.7 per cent of fair mar-\nassessment go\nbeen getting preferential\nways and putting greens.\nket value.\nsumer advocate Ralph\nEcker. \"Is a g\n(tax) treatment,\" says Frank\nNor does either the state\nHowever, current use as-\ndifferent?\nNader.\nEcker, a former Rockville\nlaw or the open-space agree-\nsessments only total 28.3 per\n\"I've talked\nBy 1975, however, 20 clubs\nmayor who now is the Mont-\nments signed by the clubs\ncent of 1975 fair market val-\nclub members ,\nare receiving the tax bene-\ngomery County public advo-\nstipulate what percentage\nues.\nopen space (u\ne $638,000 Maryland Tax Break\nse value should be of\nEcker and some state leg-\ngreat,\" says Ecker, \"but\nleast 50 per cent of the fair\nBetts said the count\nair market figure, he\nislators from Montgomery\nmany (nonmembers) say un-\nmarket value would result\nclub tax breaks are need\nsupported a House of Dele-\nder the circumstances they\nin higher dues for country\nand that clubs aid finan\nIS, in Montgomery,\ngates bill at the Maryland\ncan drive by (the clubs) and\nclub members, not all of\nally pressed local gover\nthe 20 clubs now re-\nGeneral Assembly this year\nthat's it\"-the only benefit\nwhom are rich.\nments because they m\ng the tax break signed\nthat would have required\nthey receive from the open\nBetts said it would be a\nimize \"the drain on oth\nrespective agreements,\nthat use assessments be at\nspace.\n\"very, very great hardship\nrecreational facilities,\" \\\nof them in 1966, they\nleast 50 per cent of the fair\nDavid E. Betts, an attor-\nto hit them all at once. I\n\"infinitesimal services,\" a\ntaxes on use assess-\nmarket value.\nney for the Montgomery\ndon't think it would be un-\nkeep open land from bei\nI that were an average\n\"I live in my house and its\nclubs, said it would be\nfair to bring it up to 50 per\ntransformed into housi\n7 per cent of fair mar-\nassessment goes up,\" says\n\"slightly ridiculous\" to set a\ncent, but don't do it tomor-\ndevelopments that requi\nlue.\nEcker. \"Is a golf club any\n50 per cent minimum with\nrow.\"\ncostly public services su\never\nents\nf 197\nar\nIS\n[4/8/75]\nLittle\nor an American supersonic\nd the SSTs been approved,\n) would have caused a 30\nA Half Billion\nase in skin cancer by 1990.\ne speed of the planes, it's\nwhich they travel, ex-\nKenneth J. Arrow of Har-\nere surprised to find that\nan aircraft industry had\nresearch on the matter.\nFor A Half Million!\nbasic problem as automo-\nbut up there in the strato-\ncally more dangerous. The\nrefutable.\"\ncists, economists, chemists\nHalf a billion dollars-that's the annual pot of\nin judgment of legislation which would grant addi-\nlogists who met at Woods\ngold at the end of the rainbow for Big Labor.\ntional powers and privileges to the people who\nfound that they were start-\nAnd at a cost of just $429,632 the investment\ngave all that money? Perhaps. But on the munici-\nitch on this most manifest-\nappears sound. The $429,632 went to the 1974 po-\npal level not long ago it was disclosed that unions\necological ills. The ozone,\nfrom the\na third of a million city employees pro\nes, of the Sierra Club,\nHouse Labor and Education Committee, according\nvided major financial help to elect the man who\nireaucrats and real estate\nto reports filed with the Clerk of the House. That\nhad a decisive voice in determining their benefits\nhalf million, by the way, is just the tip of the ice-\nand The New York Times said editorially, \"Whether\nberg-unreported \"in-kind\" union contributions to\nor not the law condones it, here is a real conflict\nblanket is both metaphor\nthese 33 Congressmen raises the actual total\nof interest.\"\nof the most profound sort.\nnearer to $5 million. But that's still a good buy for\nHow serious is the possibility of public sector\nbrothers never worried if\nunion professionals: half a billion for only $5 mil-\ncompulsory unionism legislation passing this Con-\nmitating Icarus but, more\nDelph\nentury later, the sun is hav-\nge in melting the wax feath-\nHawks's latitudes.\nct the ozone shield, the\ngue that a 10-year, $100 mil-\nn is needed to redesign jet\nreduce nitrous oxide emis-\nbe the aircraft companies\nand moan as did their\nbrethren in Detroit, but the\ncheap.\ntop layer of the ozone has\nted, then scientists need to\nhe plethora of aerosal cans,\nsprays are floating up to\none. The National Academy\npromises a sober, non-\neport on that next year.\nle, wait your turn.\nY JR.\nVictims\nman scruple. The history\nver so fond of talking about\nption\" that surrounded\nshek. There is no doubt that\nre is no doubt that he cavill-\na means of eliminating cor-\nis of New York City could\nwill to reduce the criminal\nNew York quite readily. All\nS that you shoot everybody\ntealing. It is quite literally\nThieu's toleration of cor-\nearned him the contempt of\nican peacocks of civic right-\nne wonders whether they\nadmired him more if he\norruption the way they deal\nrth Vietnam, or China?\nombination of ruthlessness\nity is powerful. Cortes\nh him to Mexico 508 soldiers,\n16 horses, 10 bronze guns, 4\nand 13 shotguns, and con-\nmpire of brave but easygo-\nThe North Vietnamese, day\nveloped an arms edge over\nVietnamese and calmly con-\nreat superhighways down\nrade the unlimited supply of\nered on them by Moscow and\nFor information write Research, National Right to Work Committee, 8316 Arlington Blvd., Fairfax, Va. 22030\nn as Congress slowly closed\ny observable sin committed\nthe leaders of the Third\nTHE NATIONAL\nRIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE\nFrance committed a dozen.\na special sort of callousness\nt a failure to develop the\nWASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS:\n8316 Arlington Boulevard . Fairfax, Virginia 22030\ntics appropriate to resisting\nhan merit life under Hitler,\nA national coalition of citizens from all walks of life\ne kind of life towards which\ndedicated to the belief that every American should have\nenamese are now headed.\nthe right, but should not be compelled to join or pay\nentitled to conclude that the\nmoney to labor organizations for the Right to Work.\nTuesday, April 8, 1975\nThe Washington Star\nA-13\nsmall society\nHoo BOY!IT'S THAT\nI LIKED\nTIM\nAGAIN-\nIT BETTER\nWHEN THE\nI\nRNAL\nAMERICAN\nVENUE\nTAXPAYER\nRVICE\nWASTHE\nWAS\nFORGOTTEN\nan\nMAN-\noct\n4-8\nBRICKMAN\nWashington Stor Syndicate. Inc.\nCROSBY S. NOYES\nBad Time for Rhetoric of U.S. Courage\nwould suppose, an awkward time\nLeave aside the thesis that the agony of\nNor will it be easy for the President to ig-\ng a major speech to the wor on\nVietnam is the result of our original sin in\nnore the arguments of his own secretary of\noreign policy. You can't help DD-\ntrying to help a small country defend itself\nstate of a strong causal relationship between\nrald Ford is up to the occasio\nagainst aggression. It is still the ruin of an\nthe disasters we have suffered in Asia and\nve been times in the past, to be\nenterprise that has cost the United States an\nour problems elsewhere.\nth\nti\nill\nt\nA Half Billion\nFor A Half Million!\n[4/9/75]\nWrite!\nask, \"May I check your\nhat the president has done\nA Half Billion\noney we have sent him is,\nbusiness.\ncare should be taken in\ne farewell properly. \"Sorry\n't stay longer\" may sound\neatist. At the same time,\nFor A Half Million! -Part\nk soon\" may appear, in most\n2\n:rly optimistic. A simply\net to write\" should generally\na U.S. Marine Corps Band\nfor the occasion, equal care\nOr Why Americans Have Lost Faith In Their Government\nevoted to the musical selec-\narewell songs, such as \"I'll\nWithout You Very Well,\"\net the wrong mood. A cheer-\nThe evidence has been overwhelming for many\ny tune, like \"So Long, It's\nYou can help by supporting the National Right\nto Know You,\" strikes a far\nyears that the American people need and want a\nto Work Committee, a nationwide coalition of near-\nable note.\nCongress that will curb rather than enlarge the\nly 100,000 concerned citizens from all walks of life\nor to maintain this cheery,\nimbience, the ambassador\nexcessive powers and privileges of top union offi-\nwho believe union membership should be volun-\nΓ, under any circumstances,\navailability of subsequent\nthe president is airborne.\nemergencies, the ambassa-\ner the departing president a\nthe Airport Bus Terminal.\nes, he should cite \"the rush\nto the airport\" - no matter\nur.\nthis directive will eliminate\nplaints by ambassadors in\nuch as the one referred to\nlanguage has no place in\ncables.\nProposal\nit of social justice\nAnother\nadvocating complacent ac-\nhigh rates of serious crime\npublic might eventually be-\ntraged that it will be willing\nincreasing infringements on\nberties and freedoms.'\ndy have disturbing evidence\nhard Nixon's cry for the res-\nthe death penalty for certain\nbeen taken up by a number\nslators.\nvartz, for all his supposed\nout civil liberties and free-\nI up his paper with a crime\nwhich, while not so bereft of\nss\" as the Banfield proposal\nhetto youth, is most certain-\ne.\nsays we ought to pay more\nthe fact that \"most crimes\ntted by young men in their\nventies. By the time a man\ne 40, his criminal career is\nover.\"\nproposes, then, that if an 18-\nbs a liquor store, statistical\nres that he be imprisoned\n), He argues:\nh it may seem at first glance\ncruel to imprison a convict-\nold rapist or armed robber\nthe statistical likelihood of\noffender committing at least\nal serious crime is so high it\n/ arguable that it is even\nto the potential victim of a\nviolent crime not to remove\nfrom society until the aging\nFor information write Research, National Right to Work Committee, 8316 Arlington Blvd., Fairfax, Va. 22030\nS diminished his criminal\nrging from prison at age 40,\nd offender would still be a\noung man and could expect\nle years available to him to\nife and pursue vocational or\nTHE NATIONAL\nRIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE\nWASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS:\n8316 Arlington Boulevard Fairfax, Virginia 22030\ndidn't say what leads him\nim that the \"aging process\"\nA national coalition of citizens from all walks of life\nars in prison would turn an\n18-year-old into a respon-\ndedicated to the belief that every American should have\niding 40-year-old.\nthe right, but should not be compelled to join or pay\n'ine \"cure\" is prob-\nmoney to labor organizations for the Right to Work.\nnce that\nan-\nWednesday, April 9, 1975\nThe Washington Star\nA-15\ne small society\nBUT I CAN GIVE YOU A THOUSAND\nI DON'T\nKNOW\nREASONS WHY IT WON'T WORK-\nWHAT\nPRESIDENT\nFORD\nHAS IN\nMIND\na\n4-9\nWashington Stor indicate, Inc.\nBRICKMAN\nSMITH HEMPSTONE\nAfter Vietnam: A Destiny Less Manifest\nthe end of the affair.\nwere refugees because they were fleeing\nillogical. Again, the problem - and the fail-\nalition in Laos governs at the whim\nfrom the American bombing, has yet to ex-\nure - was in execution. A withdrawal in the\nommuriete\nof\ntime i\nout a\nexists\nnder.\nina lies\nluding\ned thou\nn $150 I\nat end?\n$ the qi\nsible fc\nanoth\nfor us\nit that\nasant\nan com\nmunist\nake lit\ny make\nor the\ne possi\n: really\nwere f\ngoal: t\n'onda, 1\nA Half Billion\nFor A Half Million!-Par 2\nNational Right To Work Committee\nA COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS\nHEADQUARTERS AT THE NATION'S CAPITAL\nBERALD\nApril 15, 1975\nFORDS\nMr. John Vickerman\nOffice of the White House\n1600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW\nWashington, D.C.\nDear John:\nI have put down 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 28 as the date for\nour Right to Work briefing on public employee bargaining\nlegislation.\nA few days before the meeting, I will call to confirm the\nsession. We do hope that you will be able to arrange to\nhave several of the key Domestic Council people on hand. It\nseems to us that the administration should be especially concerned\nwith what is, we believe, the single most destructive element\nin today's economic and political affairs -- the monopoly power\nof giant labor unions, fostered and protected by special privilege\nlegislation. If that power is extended to public employees, we\nwill indeed be in deep trouble. And as I said earlier, we at\nthe Right to Work Committee feel that we need meaningful\ncommunication and understanding with the White House to avoid\na repeat of what happened in 1970 over postal reorganization and\nRight to Work.\nIt is too bad that we cannot fit into the schedule sooner but I\ndo appreciate the effort you have made. We look forward to\nmeeting with you and others at the White House in a friendly\nand cooperative give-and-take session on compulsory public\nemployee bargaining legislation.\nSincerely,\nHugh C. Newton\nDirector of Information\nHCN: 1h\nWASHINGTON D.C. HEADQUARTERS: 8316 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD (U.S. 50) SUITE 600\nFAIRFAX, VIRGINIA 22030\nTEL. (703) 573-8550\n\"Americans must have the right but not be compelled to join labor unions\"\nLYND May\nHUGH C. NEWTON AND ASSOCIATES\nWCB w\nPUBLIC RELATIONS\n618 SOUTH LEE STREET (OLD TOWNE) TELEPHONES: (703) 573-8555 (703) 549-5825\nALEXANDRIA. VIRGINIA 22314\n#\nApril 25, 1975\n102\n10 a.M.\nnator\n10 am\nJohn Reed\nMr. John Marsh\nconfirmed\nOffice of the White House\nDeenlop's office\n1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.\nWashington, D.C.\nDear John:\nAt your request, John Vickerman has set up a briefing for the National Right\nto Work Committee and some of the key and interested staffers of the domestic\ncouncil.\nYou may find the attached of interest. - two ads in the Washington Star on\nunion political spending and the front page feature on the National Committee\nand Foundation on its battle with \"Ten Big Unions.\"\nBest wishes and thanks.\nSincerely,\nHugh C. Newton\nHCN/sd\nEncl.\nCC: John Vickerman\nIf\nMEMORANDUM\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nFORD LIBRARY is GENALD\nMay 16, 1975\nMEMORANDUM FOR:\nROGER SEMERAD\nDOMESTIC COUNCIL\nJOHN READ\nEXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY OF LABOR\nFROM:\nJOHN C. VICKERMAN\nOFFICE OF PUBLIC LIAISON\nSUBJECT:\nMeeting with National Right To Work Committee\nThank you for agreeing to meet with the National Right to Work Committee\nat 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 28. We will hold the session in Room 102\nof the Old Executive Office Building -- this is Bill Baroody's Conference\nRoom.\nHugh C. Newton, Director of Information for the above Committee, and two\nor three other gentlemen interested in the question of federal employee\nunions have a presentation they would like to make, and there will\nprobably be some discussion afterwards. I would guess that the whole\nmeeting should last no longer than 45 minutes.\nThanks and see you then.\nCopy to:\nBill Baroody"
}