Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Source Description

This file contains material relating to U.S. v. Burdick; Federalist Papers; "Behind the Nixon Pardon," The Nation.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
1126648
label
Nixon Pardon - Legal Precedents
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
1126648
contentType
document
title
Nixon Pardon - Legal Precedents
description
This file contains material relating to U.S. v. Burdick; Federalist Papers; "Behind the Nixon Pardon," The Nation.
collections
Benton L. Becker Papers
General Subject Files
subjects
Nixon, Richard M. (Richard Milhous), 1913-1994
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
1126648
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1979-12-31
year
1979
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1974-01-01
year
1974
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
53bae9fa2dd928b2
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box 2, folder "Nixon Pardon - Legal Precedents" of the Benton L. Becker Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Benton Becker donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. OCT. TERM. 300. 0 V WRIT of Certiorari to the United (236 GEORGE U. BURDICK, Plff. in Err., S. 73) "Woodrow Wilson, President of the Unit- States Circuit Court of Appeals for the attached." This certificate was one of ten States of America, to all to whom these issued to provide for the payment for ballot V. Eighth Circuit to review a judgment which machines, and the Constitution of the state UNITED STATES. presents shall come, Greeting: affirmed a judgment of the Circuit Court for "Whereas George Burdick, an editor of the the District of Colorado in favor of plain- authorized provision for payment in such PARDON ($ OF Ac- New York Tribune, has declined to testify tiff in an action upon a municipal certificate case "by the issuance of interest-bearing of indebtedness. Affirmed. bonds, certificates of indebtedness, or other CEPTANCE. 1. A pardon from the President, to be before a Federal grand jury now in session in the southern district of New York, in 31 See same case below, 118 C. C. A. 256, obligations, which shall be a charge upon effective, must be accepted by the person to a proceeding entitled, 'United States V. John 200 Fed. 28. such city, city and county, or town; such whom it is tendered. bonds, certificates, or other obligations may [Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Pardon, Cent. Doe and Richard Roe,' as to the sources of The facts are stated in the opinion. be made payable at such time or times, not Dig. $$ 10, 14, 15: Dec. Dig. $ 8.*) the information which he had in the New Messrs. Charles R. Brock, William H. WITNESSES (§ 303*) PRIVILEGE EFFECT York Tribune office, or in his possession, or Ferguson, -I. N. Stevens, Milton Smith, exceeding ten years from the date of issue, OF REJECTED PARDON. under his control at the time he sent Henry Charles S. Thomas, and William H. Bryant as may be determined, but shall not be is. 2. The tender of a pardon from the D. Kingsbury, a reporter on the said New for petitioner. sued or sold at less than par." Art. 7, $ President does not destroy the privilege of witness against self-crimination, but he York Tribune, to write an article which Messrs. John Maxey Zane, Charles W. as amended November 6, 1906. A statute appeared in the said New York Tribune in Waterman, and Charles F. Morse for re- in like words previously had been passed, to reject the pardon and refuse to tes- may tify on the ground that his testimony may its issue of December 31st, 1913, headed, spondent. be effective if the amendment to the Con- stitution should be adopted, as it was. have an incriminating effect. 'Glove Makers' Geins May Be Customs Size,' Cent. Dig. §§ 1049, 1050: Dec. Dig. [Ed. Note-For other cases. SEP on the ground that it would tend to in- Laws of 1905, chap. 101, § 6. See Rev. Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opin- criminate him to answer the questions; and, ion of the court: Stat. 100S, § 2342. The defense that we are considering is that the foregoing words [No. 471.] "Whereas, the United States attorney for This is an action brought by the respond- the southern district of New York desires did not warrant making the certificates of indebtedness negotiable, relying especially Argued December 16, 1914. Decided Jan- to use the said George Burdick as a witness ent upon a certificate of indebtedness and an interest coupon attached to the same, uary 25, 1915. before the said grand jury in the said pro- upon Brenham V. German-American Bank, against the petitioner. There was a verdict ceeding for the purpose of determining and judgment for the plaintiff and the cir- 144 U. S. 173, 36 L. ed. 390, 12 Sup. I N ERROR to the District Court of the whether any employee of the Treasury De- Ct. Rep. 559. But the argument seems cuit court of appeals affirmed the judgment. United States for the Southern District partment at the *customhouse, New York to us to need no extended answer. The of New York to review a judgment for con- city, has been betraying information that 118 C. C. A. 256, 200 Fed. 28. The plain- power to issue certificates of indebtedness tempt for refusing to testify before the came to such person in an official capacity; tiff held the instrument by indorsement, or bonds is given in terms, and*it is con-* and was found to have purchased it in grand jury. Reversed, with directions to and, templated that these instruments may be dismiss the proceedings and discharge the "Whereas, it is believed that the said good faith before maturity, but the defend- sold to raise money for the purpose named. ant denied the authority to issue the cer- plaintiff in error from custody. George Burdick will again refuse to testify But, however narrowly we may construe the See same case below, 211 Fed. 492. in the said proceeding on the ground that tificate in negotiable form, and sought to power of municipal corporations in this re- The facts are stated in the opinion. his testimony might tend to incriminate raise the question by its third defense, spect, when they are authorized to raise Messrs. Henry A. Wise and Henry W. which set up failure of consideration. There money by the sale of bonds we must take it Sackett for plaintiff in error. himself; "Now, therefore, be it known, that I, was a demurrer to this defense, which was that they are authorized to put the bonds in Solicitor General Davis for defendant in Woodrow Wilson, President of the United sustained by the circuit court, and the trial the form that would be almost a necessary States of America, in consideration of the error. took place upon the other issues. The cir- condition to obtaining a purchaser,-the premises, divers other good and sufficient cuit court of appeals declined to consider usual form in which municipal bonds are Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opin- reasons me thereunto moving, do hereby the correctness of this ruling because no put upon the market. Gunnison County ion of the court: grant unto the said George Burdick a full exception was taken to it. But*no excep- V. E. H. Rollins & Sons, 173 U. S. 255, 276, Error to review a judgment for contempt and unconditional pardon for all offenses tion or bill of exceptions is necessary to 43 L. ed. 6S9, 608, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 390. against Burdick upon presentment of the against the United States which he, the said open a question of law already apparent What is true about bonds is true about Federal grand jury for*refusing to answer George Burdick, has committed or may have certificates of indebtedness. Indeed, it is certain questions put to him in an investi- committed, or taken part in, in connection on the record, and there is nothing in the difficult to see any distinction between the gation then pending before the grand jury with the securing, writing about, or assist- record that indicates a waiver of the defend- into alleged custom frauds in violation of ing in the publication of the information so ant's rights. Therefore we must consider two as they are commonly known to the §§ 37 and 39 of the Criminal Code of the incorporated in the aforementioned article, the merits of the defense. Nalle V. Oyster, business world. The essence of each is that 230 U. S. 165, 57 L. ed. 1439, 33 Sup. Ct. United States [35 Stat. at L. 1096, chap. and in connection with any other article, Rep. 1043. they contain a promise under the seal of 321, Comp. Stat. 1913, §§ 10201, 10203]. matter, or thing concerning which he may The certificate recites the allowance of a the corporation, to pay a certain sum to Burdick first appeared before the grand be interrogated in the said grand jury pro- claim for ballot machines by the board of order or to bearer. We are of opinion that jury and refused to answer questions as to ceeding, thereby absolving him from the con- the board of county commissioners was auth- the directions he gave and the sources of his sequences of every such criminal act. county commissioners of the city and orized to issue certificates in the negotiable Information concerning certain articles in "In testimony whereof, I have hereunto county of Denver, and goes on, "the board form. Carter County V. Sinton, 120 U. S. the New York Tribune regarding the frauds signed my name and caused the seal of the of county commissioners being authorized 517, 525, 30 L. ed. 701, 703, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. under investigation. He is the city editor Department of Justice to be affixed. Done thereto by the laws of the state of Colorado, act of 1905, hereby issues its certificate of 650; Gelpcke V. Dubuque, 1 Wall. 175, 203, of that paper. He declined to answer, claim- at the city of Washington this fourteenth 17 L. ed. 520, 524; Cadillac V. Woonsocket ing upon his oath, that his answers might day of February, in the year of our Lord indebtedness for the said sum, and will in Inst. for Sav. 7 C. C. A. 574, 16 U. S. App. tend to criminate him. Thereupon he was One Thousand Nine Hundred and Fourteen, one (1) year pay to the order of the Fed- 545, 58 Fed. 935, 937; Ashley V. Presque remanded to appear at a later day, and and of the Independence of the United eral Ballot Machine Company the sum of Isle County, S C. C. A. 455, 16 U. S. App. upon 03 appearing he was handed a pardon States the One Hundred and Thirty-eighth." $11,250, with interest on this sum, from 656, 709, 60 Fed. 55, 67; D'Esterre V. Brook- which he was told had been obtained for He declined to accept the pardon or an- the date hereof, at the rate of 5 per cent lyn, 90 Fed. 5S6, 590; Dill. Mun. Corp. 5th him upon the strength of his testimony be- swer questions as to the sources of his per annum; the said interest payable semi- ed. § SS2. fore the other grand jury. The following information, or whether he furnished cer- annually, as per two (2) coupons. tain reporters information, giving the rea- GERALD Digitized from Box 2 of the Benton Becker Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 268 35 SUPREME COURT REPORTER. OcT. TERM, BURDICK V. UNITED STATES. 269 1914. son, as before, that the answers might tend to criminate him. He was presented by the which were for obstructing the mail and eurately the response of the court to it. quences of even greater disgrace than those grand jury to the district court for con- others for robbing the mail and putting the The response was complete and considered from which it purports to relieve. Circum- tempt, and adjudged guilty thereof and to life of the carrier in jeopardy. They were the contention in two aspects: (1) a par- stances may be made to bring innocence pay a fine of $500, with leave, however, to convicted on one of the latter indictments, don as the act of the President, the official under the penalties of the law. If so purge himself by testifying fully as to the sentenced to death, and Porter was executed act under the Constitution; and (2) the brought, escape by *confession of guilt im-? sources of the information sought of him, in pursuance of the sentence. President attitude and right of the person to whom plied in the acceptance of a pardon may be "and in event of his refusal or failure to 80 Jackson pardoned Wilson, the pardon re- it is tendered. Of the former it was said rejected,-preferring to be the victim of the answer, a+commitment may issue in addition citing that it was for the crime for which that the power had been "exercised from law rather than its acknowledged trans- until he shall so comply," the court decid- he had been sentenced to suffer death, re- time immemorial by the executive of that gressor,-preferring death even to such cer- ing that the President has power to pardon mitting such penalty with the express stipu- nation [England], whose language is our tain infamy. This, at least theoretically, for a crime of which the individual has not lation that the pardon should not extend to language, and to whose judicial institutions is a right, and a right is often best tested been convicted and which he does not admit, any judgment which might be had or ob- ours bear a close resemblance; we adopt in its extreme. "It may be supposed," the and that acceptance is not necessary to tained against him in any other case or their principles respecting the operation court said in United States V. Wilson, "that toll the privilege against incrimination. cases then pending before the court for other and effect of a pardon, and look into their no being condemned to death would reject Burdick again appeared before the grand offenses wherewith he might stand charged. books for the rules prescribing the manner a pardon; but the rule must be the same jury, again was questioned as before, again To another of the indictments Wilson in which it is to be used by the person who in capital cases and in misdemeanors. A refused to accept the pardon, and again withdrew his plea of not guilty and pleaded would avail himself of it." From that pardon may be conditional; and the condi- refused to answer upon the same grounds as guilty. Upon being arraigned for sentence source of authority and principle the court tion may be more objectionable than the before. A final order of commitment was the court suggested the propriety of inquir- deduced and declared this conclusion: "A punishment inflicted by the judgment." then made and entered, and he was com- ing as to the effect of the pardon, "although pardon is an act of grace, proceeding from The case would seem to need no further mitted to the custody of the United States alleged to relate to a conviction on another the power intrusted with the execution of comment, and we have quoted from it not indictment." Wilson was asked if he wished *90 the laws, which exempts the individual on only for its authority, but for its argument. marshal until he should purge himself of to avail himself of the pardon, to which he whom it is bestowed from the punishment It demonstrates by both the necessity of contempt, or until the further order of the court. This writ of error was then allowed. answered in person that "he had nothing to the law inflicts for a crime he has com- the acceptance of a pardon to its legal ef- The question in the case is the effect of say, and that he did not wish in any manner mitted. It is the private [italics ours] ficacy, and the court did not hesitate in the unaccepted pardon. The Solicitor Gen- to avail himself, in order to avoid sentence though official act of the executive magis- decision, as we have seen, whatever the al- eral, in his discussion of the question, fol- in this particular case, of the pardon re- trate, delivered to the individual for whose ternative of acceptance,-whether it be ferred to." lowing the division of the district court, con- benefit it is intended." In emphasis of the death or lesser penalty. The contrast shows tends (1) that the President has power to The judges were opposed in opinion and official act and its functional deficiency if the right of the individual against the exer- pardon an offense before admission or con- certified to this court for decision two not accepted by him to whom it is tendered, cise of executive power not solicited by him viction of it, and (2) the acceptance of the propositions which were argued by the dis- it was said: "A private deed, not com- nor accepted by him. pardon is not necessary to its complete trict attorney of the United States, with municated to him, whatever may be its The principles declared in United States exculpating effect. The conclusion is hence one only of which we are concerned. It was character, whether a pardon or release, is V. Wilson have endured for years; no case deduced that the pardon removed from Bur- as follows: "2. That the prisoner can, un- totally unknown and cannot be acted on." has reversed or modified them. In Ex parte dick all danger of accusation or conviction der this conviction, derive no advantage Turning, then, to the other side, that is, Wells, 18 How. 307, 310, 15 L. ed. 421, 423, of crime, and that, therefore, the answers from the pardon, without bringing the same the effect of a pardon on him to whom it this court said: "It was with the fullest to the questions put to him could not tend judicially before the court by plea, motion, is offered, and completing its description knowledge of the law upon the subject of to or accomplish his incrimination. or otherwise." There was no appearance and expressing the condition of its consum- pardons and the philosophy of government Plaintiff in error counters the contention for Wilson. Attorney General Taney (af- mation, this was said: "A pardon is a deed, in its bearing upon the Constitution when this court instructed Chief Justice Mar- and conclusion with directly opposing ones, terwards chief justice of this court) argued to the validity of which delivery is essential, and makes other contentions which attack the case on behalf of the United States. and delivery is not complete without accept- shall" to declare the doctrine of that case. the sufficiency of the pardon as immunity The burden of his argument was that a ance. It may then be rejected by the person And in Com. V. Lockwood it was said by and the power of the President to grant a pardon, to be effective, must be accepted. to whom it is tendered; and if it be re- Mr. Justice Gray, speaking for the supreme pardon for an offense not precedently estab- The proposition was necessary to be estab- jected, we have discovered no power in a judicial court of Massachusetts, he then lished nor confessed nor defined. lished, as his contention was that a plea court to force it on him." being a member of that court, it is within The discussion of counsel is as broad as of the pardon was necessary to arrest the That a pardon by its mere issue has au- the election of a defendant "whether he their contentions. Our consideration may sentence upon Wilson. And he said, speak- tomatic effect resistless by him to whom it will avail himself of a pardon from the ex- be more limited. In our view of the case it ing of the pardon, "It is a grant to him is tendered, forcing upon him by mere ex- ecutive (be the pardon absolute or condi- is not material to decide whether the par- [Wilson]; it is his property; and he may ecutive power whatever consequences it may tional) 109 Mass. 323, 339, 12 Am. Rep. doning power may be exercised before con- accept it or not, as he pleases; and, fur- have or however he may regard it, which 699. The whole discussion of the learned viction. We may, however, refer to some ther: "It is insisted that unless he pleads seems to be the contention of the govern- justice will repay a reference. He cites and aspects of the contentions of plaintiff in it, or in some way claims its benefit, there- ment in the case at bar, was rejected by the *reviews the cases with the same accurate* error, although the case may be brought to by denoting his acceptance of the proffered court with particularity and emphasis. The and masterful consideration that distin- the narrow question, Is the acceptance of a grace, the court cannot notice it, nor allow decision is unmistakable. A pardon was guished all of his judicial work, and the pardon necessary? We are relieved from it to prevent them from passing sentence. denominated as the "private" act, the "pri- proposition declared was one of the con- The whole current of authority establishes vate deed," of the executive magistrate, and clusions deduced. much discussion of it by United States V. Wilson, 7 Pet. 150, 8 L. ed. 640. Indeed, this principle." The authorities were cited the denomination was advisedly selected to United States V. Wilson, however, is at- all of the principles upon which its solution and it was declared that "the necessity of mark the incompleteness of the act or deed tempted to be removed as authority by the pleading it, or claiming it in some other contention that it dealt with conditional depends were there considered and the facts without its acceptance. of the case gave them a peculiar and in- manner, grows out of the nature of the Indeed, the grace of a pardon, though pardons, and that, besides, a witness can- teresting application. grant. He must accept it." good its intention. may be only in pretense not apprehend from his testimony a con- There There can be no "abt, therefore. of the in as having purpose viction of guilt. which conviction he him- 270 is SUPREME COURT REPORTER. ly to to him, when he himself has the power Ocr. TERM, 1914. UNITED STATES V. HOLTE. 271 prevent it by accepting the immunity tribunals. We do not dwell further individual or the judgment of the judicial offered him. In support of the contentions 95 U. S. 149, 153, 24 L. ed. 442, 443, said Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opin- there is an intimation of analogy between the ground we have stated. the attack. We prefer to place the case on on that "the distinction between them is one ion of the court: rather of philological interest than of legal pardon and amnesty, cases are cited, and This writ of error was argued and sub- certain statutes of the United States importance." This is so as to their ultimate mitted at the same time as Burdick V. Unit- (2) May plaintiff in error, having the adduced whereby immunity was imposed are in effect, but there are incidental differences ed States, just decided [236 U. S. 79, 59 L. means of immunity at hand, that is, the certain instances, and under its unsolicited pardon the of the President, refuse to testify of importance. They*are of different char- ed. -, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 267]. Its purpose is acter and have different purposes. The one protection testimony has been exacted ground that his testimony may have on to review a judgment for contempt against against the claim of privilege asserted witnesses. There is plausibility in the con- by incriminating effect? A superficial consid- an overlooks offense; the other remits punish- Curtin upon presentment of the Federal but eration might dictate a negative answer, ment. The first is usually addressed to grand jury for refusing to answer certain tentions; it disappears upon reflection. Let the answer would confound rights which crimes against the sovereignty of the state, questions in the same occeding considered us consider the contentions in their order: are distinct and independent. to political offenses, forgiveness being in the Burdick Case in regard to a certain (1) To hold that the principle of United It is to be borne in mind that the power deemed more expedient for the public wel- article published in the New York Tribune. States V. Wilson was expressed only as to of the President under the Constitution to fare than prosecution and punishment. The Curtin is a reporter on that paper. He conditional pardons would be to assert that grant pardons and the right of a witness second condones infractions of the peace of declined to answer the questions, on the the language and illustrations which were must be kept in accommodation. Both have the state. Amnesty is usually general, ad- ground that the answers would tend to in- sanction in the Constitution, and it should, dressed to classes or even communities used to emphasize the principle announced criminate him. At a subsequent hearing a were meant only to destroy it. Besides, the therefore, be the anxiety of the law to = legislative act, or under legislation, consti- pardon issued by the President was offered pardon passed on was not conditional. It tutional or statutory,-the act of the su- him (it was the same in substance as that place. In this as in other conflicts between preserve leave to each*its proper was limited in that-and only in that-it preme magistrate. There may or may not offered Burdick), and he was again ques- was confined to the crime for which the de- personal rights and the powers of govern- be distinct acts of acceptance. If other tioned. He declined to receive the pardon fendant had been convicted and for which ment, technical-even nice-distinctions are rights are dependent upon it and are assert- or to answer the questions, on the same he had been sentenced to suffer death. This ed, there is affirmative evidence of accept- the proper to be regarded. Granting, then, that ground as before. He was, on presentment was its emphasis and distinction. Other pardon was legally issued and was suf- ance. Examples are afforded in United of the grand jury, adjudged guilty *con- charges were pending against him, and it ficient for immunity, it was Burdick's right States V. Klein. 13 Wall. 128, 20 L. ed. 519; tempt, fined as Burdick was, with the same was expressed that the*pardon should not to refuse it, as we have seen; and it, there- "Armstrong's Foundry, 6 Wall. 766, 18 L. leave to purge himself of the contempt, the extend to them. But such would have been fore, not becoming effective, his right under ed. 882; Carlisle V. United States, 16 Wall. court deciding that the pardon was valid its effect without expression. And we may the Constitution to decline to testify 147, 21 L. ed. 426. See also Knote V. and sufficient for immunity. Upon Curtin say that it had more precision than the mained to be asserted; and the reasons for re- United States, supra. If there be no other again refusing to answer, the judgment was pardon in the pending case. Wilson had his action were personal. It is true we rights, its only purpose is to stay the move- made absolute and he was committed to have said (Brown V. Walker, 161 U. S. 601, ment of the law. Its function is exercised been indicted for a specific statutory crime, the custody of the United States marshal. It was to the crime 80 defined and estab- 605, 40 L. ed. 822, S24, 5 Inters. Com. Rep. when it overlooks the offense and the of- convicted, and sentenced to suffer death. It will be observed, therefore, the case is 309, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 644) that the law fender, leaving both in oblivion. almost identical in its facts with the Bur- lished that the pardon was directed. In regards only mere penal consequences, and Judgment reversed, with directions to dis- dick Case and exactly the same in principle. the case at bar nothing is defined. There not "the personal disgrace or opprobrium miss the proceedings in contempt, and dis- On the authority of that case, therefore, the is no identity of the offenses pardoned, and attaching to the exposure" of crime, but charge Burdick from custody. judgment is reversed and the case remanded, no other clue to ascertain them but the in- certainly such consequence may influence with instruction to dismiss the proceedings formation incorporated in an article in the assertion or relinquishment of a right. Mr. Justice McReynolds took no part in contempt and discharge Curtin from This consideration is not out of place in the in the consideration and decision of this newspaper. And not that entirely, for ab- a custody. solution is declared for whatever crimes case at bar. If it be objected that the sen- may have been committed or taken part in sitiveness of Burdick was extreme because Mr. Justice McReynolds took no part "in connection with any other article, mat- his refusal to answer was itself an impli- (236 U. S. 96) in the consideration and decision of this ter, or thing concerning which he [Burdick] cation of crime, we answer, not necessarily WILLIAM L. CURTIN, Piff. in Err., case. V. may be interrogated." in fact, not at all in theory of law. It UNITED STATES. It is hence contended by Burdick that the supposed only a possibility of a charge of (236 U. S. 140) pardon is illegal for the absence of specifica- crime, and interposed protection against the This case is governed by the decision in UNITED STATES, Plff. in Err., V. tion,not reciting the offenses upon which charge, and, reaching beyond it, against Burdick V. United States, ante, 267. it is intended to operate; worthless, there- furnishing what might be urged or used as CLARA HOLTE. fore, as immunity. To support the conten- evidence to support it. [No 472.] CONSPIRACY (§ 28*) - AGAINST UNITED tion cases are cited. It is asserted, besides, This brings us to the differences between STATES WHITE SLAVE TRAFFIC GUILT that the pardon is void as being outside of legislative immunity and a pardon. They Argued December 16, 1914. Decided Jan- OF WOMAN. the power of the President under the Con- are substantial. The latter carries an im- uary 25, 1015. A woman may conspire "to commit an offense against the United States" within stitution of the United States, because it it. putation of guilt: acceptance a confession of N ERROR to the District Court of the the meaning of the provision of the Crimin- was issued before accusation, or conviction The former has no such imputation or United States for the Southern District al Code of March 4, 1909 (35 Stat. at L. or admission of an offense. This, it is in- confession. It is tantamount to the silence 1090, chap. 321, Comp. Stat. 1913, § 10, sisted, is precluded by the constitutional of the witness. It is noncommittal. It is of New York to review a judgment for con- 201), § 37. although the object of the con- provision which gives power only "to grant the unobtrusive act of the law given protec- tempt for refusing to testify before the spiracy is her own transportation in inter- reprieves and pardons for offenses against tion against a sinister use of his testimony, grand jury. Reversed, with directions to state commerce for purposes of prostitution, the United States," and it is argued, in not like a pardon. requiring him to confess dismiss the proceedings and discharge the contrary to the white slave act of June 25, effect, that not in the imagination or pur- plaintiff in error from custody. 1010 (36 Stat. at L. 825, chap. 395, Comp. it. his guilt in order to avoid a conviction of See same case below, 211 Fed. 402. Stat. 1913, § 8812). pose of executive magistracy can an "offense against the United States" be It is of little service to assert or dens The facts are stated in the opinion. [Ed. Note-For other cases, she Conspiracy, Cent. Dig. $$ 40. 41; Dec. Dig. I 28.°] Mesers. Henry A. Wise and Henry W. IN- 628.1 THE FEDERALIST NUMBER 74 ing the propriety of his conduct in the public opinion. A direct and categorical negative has something in the appearance of it that of expounding the laws. It is peculiarly dangerous to place more harsh, and more apt to irritate, than the mere suggestion them in a situation to be either corrupted or influenced by the Executive. PUBLIUS of argumentative objections to be approved or disapproved by those to whom they are addressed. In proportion as it would be less apt to offend, it would be more apt to be exercised; and for this very reason, it may in practice be found more effectual. It is to be hoped that it will not often happen that improper views HAMILTON will govern so large a proportion as two thirds of both branches of THE MILITARY AND PARDONING POWERS OF THE PRESIDENT the legislature at the same time; and this, too, in spite of the counterposing weight of the Executive. It is at any rate far less To the People of the State of New York: probable that this should be the case, than that such views should THE President of the United States is to be "commander-in-chief taint the resolutions and conduct of a bare majority. A power of the army and navy of the United States, and of the militia of of this nature in the Executive, will often have a silent and unper- the several States when called into the actual service of the United ceived, though forcible, operation. When men, engaged in un- States." The propriety of this provision is so evident in itself, and justifiable pursuits, are aware that obstructions may come from it is, at the same time, so consonant to the precedents of the State a quarter which they cannot control, they will often be restrained constitutions in general, that little need be said to explain or by the bare apprehension of opposition, from doing what they enforce it. Even those of them which have, in other respects, would with eagerness rush into, if no such external impediments coupled the chief magistrate with a council, have for the most were to be feared. part concentrated the military authority in him alone. Of all This qualified negative, as has been elsewhere remarked is in the cares or concerns of government, the direction of war most this State vested in a council, consisting of the governor, with the peculiarly demands those qualities which distinguish the exer- chancellor and judges of the Supreme Court, or any two of them. cise of power by a single hand. The direction of war implies the It has been freely employed upon a variety of occasions, and fre- direction of the common strength; and the power of directing quently with success. And its utility has become so apparent, that and employing the common strength, forms a usual and essential persons who, in compiling the Constitution, were violent opposers part in the definition of the executive authority. of it, have from experience become its declared admirers. "The President may require the opinion, in writing, of the I have in another place remarked, that the convention, in the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any formation of this part of their plan, had departed from the model subject relating to the duties of their respective officers." This of the constitution of this State, in favor of that of Massachu- I consider as a mere redundancy in the plan, as the right for setts. Two strong reasons may be imagined for this preference. which it provides would result of itself from the office. One is that the judges, who are to be the interpreters of the law, He is also to be authorized to grant "reprieves and pardons might receive an improper bias, from having given, a previous for offences against the United States, except in cases of impeach- opinion in their revisionary capacities; the other is that by ment." Humanity and good policy conspire to dictate, that the being often associated with the Executive, they might be induced benign prerogative of pardoning should be as little as possible to embark too far in the political views of that magistrate, and fettered or embarrassed. The criminal code of every country par- thus a dangerous combination might by degrees be cemented takes so much of necessary severity, that without an easy access between the executive and judiciary departments. It is impossible to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear to keep the judges too distinct from every other avocation than a countenance too sanguinary and cruel. As the sense of responsi- Mr. Abraham Yates, a warm opponent of the plan of the convention, is of this bility is always strongest, in proportion as it is undivided, it may number.- PUBLIUS be inferred that a single man would be most ready to attend to 472 473 galleg 08 THE FEDERALIST NUMBER 75 the force of those motives which might plead for a mitigation of party, they might often be found obstinate and inexorable, wher the rigor of the law, and least apt to yield to considerations which policy demanded a conduct of forbearance and clemency. Bu were calculated to shelter a fit object of its vengeance. The reflec- the principal argument for reposing the power of pardoning ir tion that the fate of a fellow-creature depended on his sole fiat, this case to the Chief Magistrate is this: in seasons of insurrec would naturally inspire scrupulousness and caution; the dread tion or rebellion, there are often critical moments, when a well of being accused of weakness or connivance, would beget equal timed offer of pardon to the insurgents or rebels may restore the circumspection, though of a different kind. On the other hand, tranquillity of the commonwealth; and which, if suffered to pas as men generally derive confidence from their numbers, they unimproved, it may never be possible afterwards to recall. The might often encourage each other in an act of obduracy, and might dilatory process of convening the legislature, or one of its branches be less sensible to the apprehension of suspicion or censure for for the purpose of obtaining its sanction to the measure, would an injudicious or affected clemency. On these accounts, one man frequently be the occasion of letting slip the golden opportunity appears to be a more eligible dispenser of the mercy of govern- The loss of a week, a day, an hour, may sometimes be fatal. I ment, than a body of men. it should be observed, that a discretionary power, with a view to The expediency of vesting the power of pardoning in the such contingencies, might be occasionally conferred upon the President has, if I mistake not, been only contested in relation to President, it may be answered in the first place, that it is question the crime of treason. This, it has been urged, ought to have de- able, whether, in a limited Constitution, that power could be pended upon the assent of one, or both, of the branches of the delegated by law; and in the second place, that it would generally legislative body. I shall not deny that there are strong reasons be impolitic beforehand to take any step which might hold ou to be assigned for requiring in this particular the concurrence of the prospect of impunity. A proceeding of this kind, out of the that body, or of a part of it. As treason is a crime levelled at the usual course, would be likely to be construed into an argument O immediate being of the society, when the laws have once ascer- timidity or of weakness, and would have a tendency to embolder tained the guilt of the offender, there seems a fitness in referring guilt. PUBLIUS the expediency of an act of mercy towards him to the judgment of the legislature. And this ought the rather to be the case, as the supposition of the connivance of the Chief Magistrate-ought 75 not to be entirely excluded. But there are also strong objections HAMILTON to such a plan. It is not to be doubted, that a single man of pru- THE PRESIDENT AND THE TREATY POWER dence and good sense is better fitted, in delicate conjunctures, to balance the motives which may plead for and against the remis- sion of the punishment, than any numerous body whatever. It To the People of the State of New York: deserves particular attention, that treason will often be con- THE President is to have power, "by and with the advice ano nected with seditions which embrace a large proportion of the consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two-thirds o community; as lately happened in Massachusetts. In every such the senators present concur." case, we might expect to see the representation of the people Though this provision has been assailed, on different grounds tainted with the same spirit which had given birth to the offence. with no small degree of vehemence, I scruple not to declare m` And when parties were pretty equally matched, the secret sympa- firm persuasion, that it is one of the best digested and mos thy of the friends and favorers of the condemned person, avail- unexceptionable parts of the plan. One ground of objection i ing itself of the good-nature and weakness of others, might fre- the trite topic of the intermixture of powers; some contendin; quently bestow impunity where the terror of an example was that the President ought alone to possess the power of making necessary. On the other hand, when the sedition had proceeded treaties; others, that it ought to have been exclusively deposite from causes which had inflamed the resentments of the major in the Senate. Another source of objection is derived from th THE FEDERALIST NUMBER 69 have a Licutenant-Governor, chosen by the people at large, who impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or presides in the Senate, and is the constitutional substitute for the other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and Governor, in casualties similar to those which would authorize would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the the Vice-President to exercise the authorities and discharge the ordinary course of law. The person of the king of Great Britain duties of the President. PUBLIUS is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be sub- jected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. In 69 3.3 this delicate and important circumstance of personal responsi- HAMILTON bility, the President of Confederated America would stand upon COMPARISON OF THE PRESIDENT WITH OTHER EXECUTIVES no better ground than a governor of New York, and upon worse ground than the governors of Maryland and Delaware. To the People of the State of New York: The President of the United States is to have power to return a bill, which shall have passed the two branches of the legislature, I PROCEED now to trace the real characters of the proposed Execu- for reconsideration; and the bill so returned is to become a law, tive, as they are marked out in the plan of the convention. This if, upon that reconsideration, it be approved by two thirds of both will serve to place in a strong light the unfairness of the repre- houses. The king of Great Britain, on his part, has an absolute sentations which have been made in regard to it. negative upon the acts of the two houses of Parliament. The dis- The first thing which strikes our attention is, that the executive use of that power for a considerable time past does not affect the authority, with few exceptions, is to be vested in a single magis- reality of its existence; and is to be ascribed wholly to the crown's trate. This will scarcely, however, be considered as a point upon having found the means of substituting influence to authority, which any comparison can be grounded; for if, in this particular, or the art of gaining a majority in one or the other of the two there be a resemblance to the king of Great Britain, there is not houses, to the necessity of exerting a prerogative which could less a resemblance to the Grand Seignior, to the khan of Tartary, seldom be exerted without hazarding some degree of national to the Man of the Seven Mountains, or to the governor of New agitation. The qualified negative of the President differs widely York. from this absolute negative of the British sovereign; and tallies That magistrate is to be elected for four years; and is to be exactly with the revisionary authority of the council of revision reëligible as often as the people of the United States shall think of this State, of which the governor is a constituent part. In this him worthy of their confidence. In these circumstances there is a respect the power of the President would exceed that of the total dissimilitude between him and a king of Great Britain, who governor of New York, because the former would possess, singly, in an hereditary monarch, possessing the crown as a patrimony what the latter shares with the chancellor and judges; but it would descendible to his heirs forever; but there is a close analogy be precisely the same with that of the governor of Massachusetts, between him and a governor of New York, who is elected for whose constitution, as to this article, seems to have been the three years, and is reëligible without limitation or intermission. original from which the convention have copied. If we consider how much less time would be requisité for estab- The President is to be the "commander-in-chief of the army lishing a dangerous influence in a single State, than for, establish- and navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several ing a like influence throughout the United States, we must con- States, when called into the actual service of the United States. clude that a duration of four years for the Chief Magistrate of the He is to have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offences Union is a degree of permanency far less to be dreaded in that against the United States, except in cases of impeachment; to office, than a duration of three years for a corresponding office in recommend to the consideration of Congress such measures as a single State. he shall judge necessary and expedient; to convene, on extraordi- The President of the United States would be liable to be nary occasions, both houses of the legislature, or either of them, 444 445 THE FEDERALIST NUMBER 69 and, in case of disagreement between them with respect to the of the President, in respect to pardons, would extend to all cases, time of adjournment, to adjourn them to such time as he shall except those of impeachment. The governor of New York may think proper; to take care that the laws be faithfully executed; pardon in all cases, even in those of impeachment, except for and to commission all officers of the United States." In most of treason and murder. Is not the power of the governor, in this these particulars, the power of the President will resemble equally article, on a calculation of political consequences, greater than that of the king of Great Britain and of the governor of New York. that of the President? All conspiracies and plots against the gov- The most material points of difference are these: - First. The ernment, which have not been matured into actual treason, may President will have only the occasional command of such part of be screened from punishment of every kind, by the interposition the militia of the nation as by legislative provision may be called of the prerogative of pardoning. If a governor of New York, there- into the actual service of the Union. The king of Great Britain fore, should be at the head of any such conspiracy, until the design and the governor of New York have at all times the entire com- had been ripened into actual hostility he could insure his accom- mand of all the militia within their several jurisdictions. In this plices and adherents an entire impunity. A President of the article, therefore, the power of the President would be inferior to Union, on the other hand, though he may even pardon treason, that of either the monarch or the governor. Second. The Presi- when prosecuted in the ordinary course of law, could shelter no dent is to be commander-in-chief of the army and navy of the offender, in any degree, from the effects of impeachment and con- United States. In this respect his authority would be nominally viction. Would not the prospect of a total indemnity for all the the same with that of the king of Great Britain, but in substance preliminary steps be a greater temptation to undertake and per- much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the severe in an enterprise against the public liberty, than the mere supreme command and direction of the military and naval forces, prospect of an exemption from death and confiscation, if the final as first General and admiral of the Confederacy; while that of the execution of the design, upon an actual appeal to arms, should British king extends to the declaring of war and to the raising miscarry? Would this last expectation have any influence at all, and regulating of fleets and armies, - all which, by the Constitu- when the probability was computed, that the person who was to tion under consideration, would appertain to the legislature.* afford that exemption might himself be involved in the conse- The governor of New York, on the other hand, is by the constitu- quences of the measure, and might be incapacitated by his agency tion of the State vested only with the command of its militia and in it from affording the desired impunity? The better to judge navy. But the constitutions of several of the States expressly declare of this matter, it will be necessary to recollect, that, by the pro- their governors to be commanders-in-chief, as well of the army as posed Constitution, the offence of treason is limited "to levying navy; and it may well be a question, whether those of New Hamp- war upon the United States, and adhering to their enemies, giving shire and Massachusetts, in particular, do not, in this instance, them aid and comfort"; and that by the laws of New York it is confer larger powers upon their respective governors, than could confined within similar bounds. Fourth. The President can only be claimed by a President of the United States. Third. The power adjourn the national legislature in the single case of disagreement about the time of adjournment. The British monarch may pro- A writer in a Pennsylvania paper, under the signature of TAMONY, has asserted rogue or even dissolve the Parliament. The governor of New York that the king of Great Britain owes his prerogative as commander-in-chief to an annual mutiny bill. The truth is, on the contrary, that his prerogative, in this may also prorogue the legislature of this State for a limited time; respect, is immemorial, and was only disputed, "contrary to all reason and prece- a power which, in certain situations, may be employed to very dent," as Blackstone, vol. i., page 262, expresses it, by the Long Parliament of important purposes. Charles I.; but by the statute the 13th of Charles II., chap. 6, it was declared to be in the king alone, for that the sole supreme government and command of the The President is to have power, with the advice and consent militia within his Majesty's realms and dominions, and of all forces by sea and of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the senators land, and of all forts and places of strength, EVER WAS AND IS the undoubted right present concur. The king of Great Britain is the sole and absolute of his Majesty and his royal predecessors, kings and queens of England, and that both or either house of Parliament cannot nor ought to pretend to the same. representative of the nation in all foreign transactions. He can PUBLIUS of his own accord make treaties of peace, commerce, alliance, and 446 447 THE FEDERALIST NUMBER 69 of every other description. It has been insinuated, that his au- thority in this respect is not conclusive, and that his conventions of the Senate, to appoint ambassadors and other public ministers, with foreign powers are subject to the revision, and stand in need judges of the Supreme Court, and in general all officers of the of the ratification, of Parliament. But I believe this doctrine was United States established by law, and whose appointments are never heard of, until it was broached upon the present occasion. not otherwise provided for by the Constitution. The king of Every jurist * of that kingdom, and every other man acquainted Great Britain is emphatically and truly styled the fountain of with its Constitution, knows, as an established fact, that the pre- honor. He not only appoints to all offices, but can create offices. rogative of making treaties exists in the crown in its utmost plen- He can confer titles of nobility at pleasure; and has the disposal titude; and that the compacts entered into by the royal authority of an immense number of church preferments. There is evidently have the most complete legal validity and perfection, independent a great inferiority in the power of the President, in this particular, of any other sanction. The Parliament, it is true, is sometimes to that of the British king; nor is it equal to that of the governor seen employing itself in altering the existing laws to conform them of New York, if we are to interpret the meaning of the constitution to the stipulations in a new treaty; and this may have possibly of the State by the practice which has obtained under it. The given birth to the imagination, that its coöperation was necessary power of appointment is with us lodged in a council, composed of to the obligatory efficacy of the treaty. But this parliamentary the governor and four members of the Senate, chosen by the As- interposition proceeds from a different cause: from the necessity sembly. The governor claims, and has frequently exercised, the of adjusting a most artificial and intricate system of revenue and right of nomination, and is entitled to a casting vote in the ap- commercial laws, to the changes made in them by the operation pointment. If he really has the right of nominating, his authority of the treaty; and of adapting new provisions and precautions to is in this respect equal to that of the President, and exceeds it in the new state of things, to keep the machine from running into the article of the casting vote. In the national government, if the disorder. In this respect, therefore, there is no comparison between Senate should be divided, no appointment could be made; in the the intended power of the President and the actual power of the government of New York, if the council should be divided, the British sovereign. The one can perform alone what the other can governor can turn the scale, and confirm his own nomination.* do only with the concurrence of a branch of the legislature. It If we compare the publicity which must necessarily attend the must be admitted, that, in this instance, the power of the federal mode of appointment by the President and an entire branch of Executive would exceed that of any State Executive. But this arises the national legislature, with the privacy in the mode of appoint- naturally from the sovereign power which relates to treaties. If ment by the governor of New York, closeted in a secret apartment the Confederacy were to be dissolved, it would become a question with at most four, and frequently with only two persons; and if whether the Executives of the several States were not solely in- we at the same time consider how much more easy it must be to vested with that delicate and important prerogative. influence the small number of which a council of appointment consists, than the considerable number of which the national The President is also to be authorized to receive ambassadors and other public ministers. This, though it has been a rich theme Senate would consist, we cannot hesitate to pronounce that the of declamation, is more a matter of dignity than of authority. It power of the chief magistrate of this State, in the disposition of is a circumstance which will be without consequence in the ad- offices, must, in practice, be greatly superior to that of the Chief Magistrate of the Union. ministration of the government; and it was far more convenient that it should be arranged in this manner, than that there should Hence it appears that, except as to the concurrent authority be a necessity of convening the legislature, or one of its branches, of the President in the article of treaties, it would be difficult to upon every arrival of a foreign minister, though it were merely Candor, however, demands an acknowledgment that I do not think the claim to take the place of a departed predecessor. of the governor to a right of nomination well founded. Yet it is always justi- fiable to reason from the practice of a government, till its propriety has been The President is to nominate, and, with the advice and consent constitutionally questioned. And independent of this claim, when we take into view Vide Blackstone's "Commentaries," vol. i., p. 257. PUBLIUS the other considerations, and pursue them through all their consequences, we shall be inclined to draw much the same conclusion. - PUBLIUS 448 440 THE FEDERALIST NUMBER 70 determine whether that magistrate would in the aggregate, possess 70 more or less power than the Governor of New York. And it appears HAMILTON yet more unequivocally, that there is no pretence for the parallel which has been attempted between him and the king of Great ADVANTAGES OF A SINGLE EXECUTIVE Britain. But to render the contrast in this respect still more strik- ing, it may be of use to throw the principal circumstances of To the People of the State of New York: dissimilitude into a closer group. The President of the United States would be an officer elected THERE is an idea, which is not without its advocates, that a viga by the people for four years; the king of Great Britain is a per- orous Executive is inconsistent with the genius of republicar petual and hereditary prince. The one would be amenable to government. The enlightened well-wishers to this species of gove personal punishment and disgrace; the person of the other is ernment must at least hope that the supposition is destitute of sacred and inviolable. The one would have a qualified negative foundation; since they can never admit its truth, without at the upon the acts of the legislative body; the other has an absolute same time admitting the condemnation of their own principles negative. The one would have a right to command the military Energy in the Executive is a leading character in the definition and naval forces of the nation; the other, in addition to this right, of good government. It is essential to the protection of the come possesses that of declaring war, and of raising and regulating fleets munity against foreign attacks; it is not less essential to the steadi and armies by his own authority. The one would have a concurrent administration of the laws; to the protection of property agains power with a branch of the legislature in the formation of treaties; those irregular and high-handed combinations which sometime the other is the sole possessor of the power of making treaties. The interrupt the ordinary course of justice; to the security of libert one would have a like concurrent authority in appointing offices; against the enterprises and assaults of ambition, of faction, and of the other is the sole author of all appointments. The one can anarchy. Every man the least conversant in Roman story, know confer no privileges whatever: the other can make denizens of how often that republic was obliged to take refuge in the absolute aliens, noblemen of commoners: can erect corporations with all power of a single man, under the formidable title of Dictator, al the rights incident to corporate bodies. The one can prescribe no well against the intrigues of ambitious individuals who aspired rules concerning the commerce or currency of the nation; the to the tyranny, and the seditions of whole classes of the com other is in several respects the arbiter of commerce, and in this munity whose conduct threatened the existence of all government capacity can establish markets and fairs, can regulate weights and as against the invasions of external enemies who menaced the measures, can lay embargoes for a limited time, can coin money, conquest and destruction of Rome. can authorize or prohibit the circulation of foreign coin. The There can be no need, however, to multiply arguments of one has no particle of spiritual jurisdiction; the other is the examples on this head. A feeble Executive implies a feeble execut supreme head and governor of the national church! What answer tion of the government. A feeble execution is but another phrase shall we give to those who would persuade us that things so unlike for a bad execution; and a government ill executed, whatever il resemble each other? The same that ought to be given to those who may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government. tell us that a government, the whole power of which would be in Taking it for granted, therefore, that all men of sense will the hands of the elective and periodical servants of the people, is agree in the necessity of an energetic Executive, it will only res an aristocracy, a monarchy, and a despotism. PUBLIUS main to inquire, what are the ingredients which constitute this energy? How far can they be combined with those other singredients which constitute safety in the republican sense? And how far does this combination characterize the plan which has been reported by the convention? The ingredients which constitute energy in the Executive are 450 451 Some items in this folder were not digitized because it contains copyrighted materials. Please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library for access to these materials. TUESDAY, APRIL 3 1979 YAGS JUT 7209 XXOY A31 How Haig paved the way for Nixon' S pardon By Richard Gooding Gerald Ford reveals for the first time in his forth- What Ford thought coming memoirs that Gen. Alexander Haig raised the idea of a presidential par- of Kissinger, Rocky, don a week before Nixon resigned from the presi-/ dency. Reagan and Co. According to The Nation The Nation. 7. 1979 $1 THE FORD MEMOIRS GLOBAL MONOPOLY BEHIND THE MONEY GAMES NIXON PARDON BELL ABOVE NATIONS PLAY THE LAW In his memoirs, A Time to Heal, which WILLIAM K. TABB Harper & Row will publish in late May or Aryeh Neier early June, former President Gerald R. The international economy these days is Ford says that the idea of giving a blanket best understood as a complex game of pardon to Richard M. Nixon was raised be- chicken. The name of this global game is fore Nixon resigned from the Presidency PRICES international capitalism, and the way it is by Gen. Alexander Haig, who was then the EXPLODE played hasn't changed all that much over White House chief of staff. the last couple of centuries. Yet the playing Ford also writes that, but for a misun- Robert field looks more confused than usual. In the derstanding, he might have selected Ron- Lekachman immortal words of Bud Abbott and Lou ald Reagan as his 1976 running mate, that Costello, "Who's on first?" It indeed is diffi- Washington lawyer Edward Bennett Wil- cult to tell the players without a score card, liams, a Democrat, was his choice for head of or what they're doing without a rule book. the Central Intelligence Agency, that Nixon There are mixed teams of shifting mem- was the one who first proposed Nelson RELIGION bership. The main players are nations, Rockefeller for Vice President, and that he bankers, corporations, political parties and regretted his "cowardice" in allowing Rock- AND THE trade unions. Each will form alliances with efeller to remove himself from Vice Presi- REV. MOON other players for temporary goals. To the dential contention. Ford also describes his spectator the action of the playing field is often prickly relations with Henry Kis- Irving Louis confusing. And, of course, it is really not a singer. Horowitz game. This year is, after all, the golden an- The Nation obtained the 655-page type- niversary of the 1929 Great Depression. Ri- script before publication. Advance excerpts valries like these in the past have resulted from the book will appear in Time in mid- in trade wars, not to mention world wars. April and in The Reader's Digest thereaf- INFLATION IN The biggest gamesters are trying to win ter. Although the initial print order has not by convincing everybody else that the game been decided, the figure is tentatively set at THE STREETS is really quite stupid and everyone should 50,000; it could change, depending upon Fred J. Cook stop playing. These sophisticated players the public reaction to the serialization. are the global corporations. Their game is Ford's account of the Nixon pardon con- free trade and, as their weaker competitors tains significant new detail on the negotia- complain, they really want to play by their tions and considerations that surrounded ow rules. it. According to Ford's version, the subject 'ZOOT SUIT' In Europe a once-again expansionist was first broached to him by General Haig STORY Germany plays a new version of the on August 1, 1974, a week before Nixon re- balance-of-power game, calling for a new signed. General Haig revealed that the Carey European money unit and a European newly transcribed White House tapes were McWilliams Monetary Fund. This is, in effect, an end- the equivalent of the "smoking gun" and run. around the United States-controlled that Ford should prepare himself to be- International Monetary Fund. Yet the Ger- come President. mans are in turn imposing the I.M.F. rules Ford was deeply hurt by Haig's revela- of the game on their weaker European (Continued on Page 363) (Continued on Page 369)