Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
1553393
label
March 10, 1976 - Ford, Kissinger
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
1553393
contentType
document
title
March 10, 1976 - Ford, Kissinger
collections
Memoranda of Conversations (Nixon and Ford Administrations)
Ford Administration Memoranda of Conversations
subjects
Department of State. 9/1789-
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
1553393
coverageEndDate
day
10
logicalDate
1976-03-10
month
3
year
1976
coverageStartDate
day
10
logicalDate
1976-03-10
month
3
year
1976
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
54323b5ff1392e5d
ocrText
File scanned from the National Security Adviser's Memoranda of Conversation Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON SECRET/NODIS/XGDS MEMORANDUM OF CONVERSATION PARTICIPANTS: President Ford Dr. Henry A. Kissinger, Secretary of State Brent Scowcroft, Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, March 10, 1976 9:30 - 10:00 a.m. PLACE: The Private Study Kissinger: Maybe Brent should call Dinitz. We expect an answer by Friday. I told him you would quote comparative figures, using our intelligence estimates if necessary. President: I read your speech. It was too long for me. But I don't think it is too tough. Bob [Hartmann] has given me a draft for Chicago which is 75% Defense which is designed to show I am not a Johnny-come- lately to the idea we need strong defenses. DECLASIFIED E.O. 12958, SEC. NSC MEMO, STATE GUIDELINES Stah Review 3/12/04 [More discussion about the speech.] Kissinger: I have some thoughts on personnel. First, I think I ought to pick someone from inside so someone doesn't have to learn the job for NARA DATE 6/19/04 these few months. The best ones substantively would be Rogers, and Habib. If that is a problem, the next best would be Robinson. Or we could go with Maw. Or David Bruce. President: What does the number two man do? Kissinger: He administers the Department, sees Ambassadors, focuses on the areas the Secretary doesn't. President: What does number three do? BY CLASSIFIED BY BRENT SCOWCROFT EXEMPT FROM GENERAL DECLASSIFICATION SEGRET/NODIS/XGDS SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 11652 EXEMPTION CATEGORY 5 (b) (1,3) AUTOMATICALLY DECLASSIFIED ON Imp. to det. SECRET/NODIS/XGDS 2. Kissinger: He generally coordinates the substance of the Bureaus. Habib would be good there -- or Rogers, except he isn't a Foreign Service Officer. President: My only problem with Rogers is political. Acting for you over here I think would create a tension which wouldn't be there with Robinson. I am speaking very cordially. Kissinger: It is a shame. Rogers would be the best. President: Here is one to think about -- - Zarb thinks his job is about done. Kissinger: He doesn't know enough to be Deputy. President: I agree. Kissinger: I could think about Assistant for Latin America. President: How about Robinson, and Rogers to replace him? Kissinger: I don't know what your thinking about the Middle East trip is. President: I thought we were putting it off. Kissinger: Yes, I think it's not a good idea before UNDOF. Maybe not before the election. President: What about the Sheehan article? Kissinger: I said if the material had been dumped, it was totally unauthorized. SECRET/NODIS/XGDS 2 P/K 10 mar 76 k magh Bent should call Dinity. We expect an ansure by Firday. That you anm gines congration prgins, with estriation of writing P Irent your speech. It was too long An me but I dritchink it is too tough. Both has given me a draft which is 75 % define which is Darginat show I an ant Johnny enve buth (ure discussion about openh) K On personnel. int I think daughts pick miche from in in to sourcove dvesn't have to learne job for these from muths, The but substantively would by Rogers, Hubith, If that is a pun, nbt hest unle be Osme can't w w/ mom Or Daniel Burd. P what chres < # 2 do? K. that Advisister & Dept, yes anbersoires, presses or axers c sing docount. P What dues #3do K He gerally C subtance of Habith countrible yeard there a Rogers, except he but FSO. P my only from as/ Royers is polatical. a time for your or hire I thin and evention tension which committent he three w/ Roberson & speaking my K IT is a thome. Rogers would her but P Here is one to think almit- Zanh thinks his job is about done. K He dont here energy to he disputy. P Saper K 2 cm rl think about asst for hatmin america. P How acht Rohnson R Rogers to replaction DECLASSIRED E.O. 12958, SEC. 3.5 NSC MeMo, 11/24/03, STATE DEPT. GUIDELINES state Review 3/12/04 BY 10 NARA, DATE 6/18/04 GERALD THANA K I don't hum what you Christing about M F. try is P Jeht we whe pritting it off. K yes, It th not and lofer UKCOOF. Wayhe not impore electron P what short Sheehom antile K I sond if to had have drawned what K goad you P. FORD GERALD