Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Source Description
This file contains the text of speech given by People's Republic of China's foreign minister, attacking US and Soviet Union foreign policy.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
1553801
label
People's Republic of China (8)
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
1553801
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
People's Republic of China (8)
description
This file contains the text of speech given by People's Republic of China's foreign minister, attacking US and Soviet Union foreign policy.
citationUrl
collections
Presidential Country Files for East Asia and the Pacific (Ford Administration)
East Asia and Pacific Country Files
subjects
China
Soviet Union
thumbnailUrl
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
1553801
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1975-09-30
month
9
year
1975
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1975-09-01
month
9
year
1975
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
61406352fd3eb351
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box 13, folder "People's Republic of China (8)" of
the Presidential Country Files for East Asia and the Pacific at the Gerald R. Ford
Presidential Library.
Copyright Notice
The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of
photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. The Council donated to the United
States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections.
Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public
domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to
remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid
copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.
Digitized from Box 13 of Presidential Country Files for East Asia and the Pacific at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library
PRESIDENT HAS SEE
6419
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
MEETING WITH THE DELEGATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC
AND TECHNICAL ASSOCIATION FROM THE
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
Saturday, September 27, 1975
9:30 a. m. (15 minutes)
The Cabinet Room
From: Henry A. Kissinger
Bo
I. PURPOSE
To underline the importance you attach to our relations with the
People's Republic of China, and to lay the groundwork for your
own visit to Peking later this year.
II.
BACKGROUND, PARTICIPANTS & PRESS ARRANGEMENTS
A. Background: This delegation from China's Scientific and
Technical Association is the most senior scientific group
from the PRC to visit the U.S. This exchange tour is being
hosted by the National Academy of Sciences' Committee on
Scholarly Communication with the PRC, a 'facilitating organi-
zation" which assists the government in the development of
scientific exchanges with the Chinese.
B. Participants: A 14-man scientific delegation led by Dr. Chou
Pei-yuan, Vice Chairman of the Scientific and Technical
Association and Vice Chairman of the Revolutionary Committee
of Peking University; PRC Liaison Office Chief Huang Chen;
Dr. Philip Handler, President of the National Academy of
Sciences; Dr. Frank Press and Anne Keatley, respectively
Chairman and Staff Director of the Committee on Scholarly
Communication with the PRC; General Scowcroft. (See Tab A
for a complete list of attendees.)
C. Press Arrangements: Press photo session. Meeting to be
announced.
FORD : GERALD LIBRARY
2
III.
TALKING POINTS
1. I am pleased to welcome Dr. Chou P'ei-yuan (pronounced
JOE PAY-YWAN) and the other members of the Scientific
and Technical Association from the People's Republic of
China. You are a distinguished group, and we take some
pride in the fact that a number of you studied in the U.S.
Dr. Chou, I believe, went to the University of Chicago,
Stanford, and Cal Tech. Dr. Tseng (pronounced DZENG)
and I are even schoolmates. I understand he was a Rackham
Fellow at Michigan between 1939 and 1943.
2. The scientific exchange program between China and the U.S.
is an important part of our efforts to build normal and con-
structive ties. We believe there is much we can contribute
to each other on a mutual basis in such exchanges, and that
in the process mutual understanding will be increased. At
the same time, we know China stresses national development
on the basis of self-reliance. We believe a strong, developing,
and independent China is in the interest of a more secure
world.
3. I note that members of this delegation will be lecturing in the
U.S. on such topics as aerodynamics, environmental protec-
tion, nuclear physics, astronomy, and oceanology. I believe
it is a positive development that our exchange program is
moving to greater substantive contact. It would be a good thing
if we could promote cooperative research projects and longer-
term visits of our scientists.
4. I look forward to visiting your country later this year. As
Secretary Kissinger stressed in his U.N. speech earlier this
week, we attach the greatest importance to the new relation-
ship between our two countries. This should be a relationship
of growing vitality. And I think it is important to advance the
ties between us on the basis of strict implementation of the
Shanghai Communique.
5.
When you return to China I hope you will convey my personel
regards to your leaders: to Chairman Mao and Premier Chou
En-lai. I look forward to meeting with them later this year.
R.
FORD
LIBRARY
3
6. I understand you will be visiting universities and research
institutions from Maryland to California during your month
in the U.S. I know you will receive a friendly reception from
the American people that reflects their warm feelings for the
people of China.
7. You will be touring the White House shortly. Before you
leave, let me express appreciation to your host organization,
the Committee on Scholarly Communication with the PRC, and
to its leaders Philip Handler, Frank Press, and Anne Keatley,
for their hard work on behalf of scientific exchanges between
our two countries. You are making an important contribution
to normalization of U.S. - PRC relations.
FORD R. 07V839 LIBRARY
Presidential Meeting, Saturday, September 27, 1975 at 9:45 a. m. with the
Scientific and Technical Association Delegation from the
People's Republic of China
Scientific and Technical Delegation
U.S. Government Officials
Chou Pei-yuan, Leader
Secretary Henry A. Kissinger
Tseng Cheng-kuei, Deputy Leader
General Brent Scowcroft
Chuang Feng-kan
Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Ting Hou-chang
State William Hitchcock
Huang Yung-wei
Richard H. Solomon (NSC)
Chang Ho-chi
Cheng Tsung-shuang
Tsien Hao
Yen Tun-shih
Liu Tung-sheng
Liu Ching-yi
Chi Ming-hou
Hsia Kan-yuan
Chu Yung-hang
PRC Liaison Office Officials who will also accompany
Ambassador Huang Chen
Tsien Ta-yung
Shen Jo-yun
National Academy of Science's Committee on Scholarly Communication with
the People's Republic of China (host organization)
Philip Handler, President, National Academy of Sciences
Frank Press, Chairman, Committee on Scholarly Communication
Albert Feuerwerker, Vice Chairman, Committee on Scholarly Communication
Anne Keatley, Staff Director, Committee on Scholarly Communication
Alexander DeAngelis, Interpreter
Department of State Security Personnel
Glenn Rankin
Michael McShane
R.
GERALD
FORD
Mit
MEMORANDUM
6419
que
NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
ACTION
September 25, 1975
MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARY KISSINGER
FROM:
Richard H. Solomon RUS
SUBJECT:
Talker for the President's Meeting with the Chinese
Scientific and Technical Association
The President has agreed to meet with the Scientific and Technical
delegation from the People's Republic of China on Saturday,
September 27 at 9: 45 a.m. Consistent with our handling of the
President's recent meeting with the PRC trade group, I will invite
PRCLO Chief Huang Chen and one or two aides to attend the session.
As well, Dr. Philip Handler, President of the National Academy of
Sciences, and Dr. Frank Press and Anne Keatley -- respectively
Chairman and Staff Director of the host organization, the National
Academy of Sciences' Committee on Scholarly Communication with
the PRC --- will attend. I plan to take notes at the session.
At Tab I is a talker for the President's meeting with this delegation.
RECOMMENDATION:
That you forward the talker at Tab I to the President.
R.
GERAL
FORD
LISEARY
S/S 7518892
6419
Ann-on
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Washington, D.C. 20520
September 25, 1975
MEMORANDUM FOR LIEUTENANT GENERAL BRENT SCOWCROFT
THE WHITE HOUSE
Subject: Presidential Appointment with a
Delegation from the China (PRC)
Scientific and Technical Association
Attached is a briefing memorandum for the
President for his upcoming appointment with the
delegation from the China Scientific and Technical
Association of the People's Republic of China.
The date and time of the appointment are being arranged
by the NSC staff.
C. arth Bad
for
George S. Springsteen
Executive Secretary
GENATO R. FORD
MEMORANDUM FOR:
THE PRESIDENT
SUBJECT:
Your Appointment with a Delegation
From the China Scientific and
Technical Association (CSTA)
I. PURPOSE
Your appointment with the Delegation from the
China Scientific and Technical Association (CSTA)
is intended to signify to the leadership of the
People's Republic of China (PRC) and the American
public the importance which the US Government attaches
to the US-PRC Cultural Exchange program. It is also
hoped that this high-level gesture will convince the
Chinese to expand and enrich the exchanges.
II. BACKGROUND
The Committee on Scholarly Communications with
the People's Republic of China (CSC) is a private
committee, which has managed the US role in the
scientific and scholarly exchanges with the PRC
since that program was launched by the Shanghai
Communique of February 1972. The CSC's counterpart
on the Chinese side has been the CSTA. Capping a
three year effort by the American committee, the CSTA
this year agreed to send a high-level delegation for
a one month visit to the US from September 25 -
October 25, 1975. This delegation is the highest
level PRC scientific group to visit the US since
the reopening of contacts in 1972; it is led by one
of China's top intellectuals and vice-Chairman of
the CSTA, CHOU Pei-yuan.
Since 1972, the US-PRC exchange program has
consisted of short study tours to the respective
countries by 36 delegations of American and Chinese
scientists and scholars. Although American intellectuals
generally praise the program for successfully reopening
communications with Chinese counterparts, after 25
years without contact, they wish to expand and enrich
R.
GERALD
FORD
LIBRARY
-2-
the exchanges beyond what has been described as
"scholarly tourism", and we support their wish.
American scholars look forward to student exchanges,
cooperative research projects, and longer-term stays
in each other's countries. The CSC intends to broach
these ideas with the CSTA Delegation during the
upcoming visit. We are not hopeful, however, that
the Chinese will be receptive at this time.
III.
TALKING POINTS
-- It is my pleasure to welcome Chairman
CHOU Pei-yuan and other members of the
delegation and express appreciation for
the important role the Scientific and
Technical Association has played in the
successful scholarly exchanges which have
taken place between our two countries in
the past four years.
-- The United States highly values these exchanges
in terms of developing contacts between
important segments of our two societies and-
also in enhancing understanding and mutual
respect between our two peoples.
-- These exchanges are an important manifestation
of the developing relationship between our
governments and peoples, which was launched
with the Shanghai Communique of 1972. They
foster an atmosphere conducive to the
achievement of our common objective of
normalizing relations.
-- I would like to congratulate both the
Scientific and Technical Association and
its American host, the Committee on Schol-
arly Communication with the People's Republic
of China, for developing a fine cooperative
relationship which has formed the basis
for the success of the exchange program.
R.
FORD
GERALD
LIBRARY
-3-
-- I would hope that we can build upon the
achievements of the past in expanding and
enriching exchanges in the future, and look
forward to seeing increasing numbers of
Chinese and American scientists and scholars,
not only visiting each other's countries,
but doing cooperative study and research.
-- I would like to wish you all a successful
tour of the United States.
GERALD R. FORD LIBRATTA
-4-
IV.
PARTICIPANTS
CSTA Delegation
Chou P'ei-yuan
Chou (pronounced joe) Pei-yuan is leader of the delegation
and vice-chairman of the CSTA. He is an American-
trained theoretical physicist and one of China's top
intellectuals.
Tseng Ch'eng-k'uei
Tseng (pronounced tsung) Ch'eng-kuei is deputy leader
of the delegation and a world-renowned expert on the
study of algae. He is a top leader in the Institute
of Oceanography of the Chinese Academy of Science.
Chu Yung-hang
Deputy Director, Foreign Affairs Bureau, Scientific
and Technical Association of the People's Republic
of China.
Chuang Feng-kan
Council Member, Chinese Society of Aeronautics and
Astronautics; Professor, Peking Institute of
Aeronautics.
Yen Tun-shih
Deputy Director - Institute of Petroleum and Chemical
Engineering;
- Ministry of Petroleum and Chemical
Industries.
Liu Tung-sheng
Division Head - Kweiyang Institute of Geochemistry
Academia Sinica.
GENATO R. FORD
-5-
Ting Hou-chang
Divison Responsible Member - Institute of Physics
Academia Sinica.
Liu Ching-yi
Council Member, Chinese Chemical Society
Division Responsible Member - Institute of Environmental
Chemistry
Academia Sinica.
Chi Ming-hou
Division Responsible Member - Institute of Oceanology
Academia Sinica.
Huang Yung-wei
Division Responsible Member - Peking Observatory
Academia Sinica.
Chang Ho-chi
Head of Research Group - Nanking Tzu Chin Shan Observatory
Academia Sinica.
Cheng Tsung-shuang
Scientific Worker - Institute of Physics
Academia Sinica.
Hsia Kan-yuan
Scientific Worker - South China Sea Institute of Oceanology
Academia Sinica.
R.
GERALD
FORD
Tsien Hao
Staff Member, Foreign Affairs Bureau
Scientific and Technical Association of the People's
Republic of China.
REWRITE 6419
MEETING WITH THE DELEGATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC
AND TECHNICAL ASSOCIATION FROM THE
PEOPLE'S RERUBLIC OF CHINA
Saturday, September 27, 1975
9:45 a. m. (15 minutes)
The Cabinet Room
From: Henry A. Kissinger
L PURPOSE
To underline the importance you attach to our relations with the
People's Republic of China, and to lay the groundwork for your
own visit to Peking later this year.
IL BACKGROUND, PARTICIPANTS & PRESS ARRANGEMENTS
A. Background: This delegation from China's Scientific and
Technical Association is the most senior scientific group
from the PRC to visit the U.S. This exchange tour is being
hosted by the National Academy of Sciences' Committee on
Scholarly Communication with the PRC, a 'facilitating organi-
sation" which assists the government in the development of
scientific exchanges with the Chinese.
B. Participants: A 14-man scientific delegation led by Dr. Chou
Pei-yuan, Vice Chairman of the Scientific and Technical
Association and Vice Chairman of the Revolutionary Committee
of Peking University; PRC Liaison Office Chief Huang Chen:
Dr. Philip Handler, President of the National Academy of
Sciences; Dr. Frank Press and Anne Keatley, respectively
Chairman and Staff Director of the Committee on Scholarly
Communication with the PRC; General Scowcroft. (See Tab A
for a complete list of attendees.)
C. Press Arrangements: Press photo session. Meeting to be
announced.
LIGRARY GERALD ? FORD
Rewrtn:GenS:ms:9/26/75
6419
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
MEETING WITH THE DELEGATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC
AND TECHNICAL ASSOCIATION FROM THE
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
Saturday, September 27, 1975
9:45 a. m. (15 minutes)
The Cabinet Room
From: Henry A. Kissinger
I.
PURPOSE
To underline the importance you attach to our relations with the
People's Republic of China, and to lay the groundwork for your
own visit to Peking later this year.
II.
BACKGROUND, PARTICIPANTS & PRESS ARRANGEMENTS
A. Background: This delegation from China's Scientific and
Technical Association is the most senior scientific group
from the PRC to visit the U.S. This exchange tour is being
hosted by the National Academy of Sciences' Committee on
Scholarly Communication with the PRC, a "facilitating organi-
zation" which assists the government in the development of
scientific exchanges with the Chinese.
B. Participants: A 14-man scientific delegation led by Dr. Chou
Pei-yuan, Vice Chairman of the Scientific and Technical
Association and Vice Chairman of the Revolutionary Committee
of Peking University; PRC Liaison Office Chief Huang Chen;
BS
Secretary Kissinger; Deputy Assistant Secretary of State
William Hitchcock; Dr. Philip Handler, President of the
National Academy of Sciences; Dr. Frank Press and Anne Keatley,
respectively Chairman and Staff Director of the Committee on
Scholarly Communication with the PRC. (See Tab A for a complete
list of the attendees.)
C. Press Arrangements: Press photo session. Meeting to be
announced.
LIBRARY GERALD R. FORD
DOC
RECD
OG NBR
INITIAL ACTION o
NSC CORRESPONDENCE PROFILE
Lolon
MO
DA
MO
DA
HR
9
25
14
7506419
REFERENCE:
CIRCLE AS APPROPRIATE
TO: PRES
FROM: KINSINGER,H
S/S
UNCLAS LOG IN/OUT
KISSINGER X
SOURCE/CLASS/DESCRIPTION
COLBY, W
OTHER
LOU
NO FORN
NODIS
SCOWCROET
SCHLESINGER,
J
C
EYES ONLY EXDIS
SUBJECT: DAVIS Oather ST EX SEC the listor who China TS S SENSITIVE CODEWORD
left
27 975
9.45 A.m.
INTERNAL ROUTING AND DISTRIBUTION
REC
ACTION REQUIRED
ACTION
INFO.
ADVANCE Polonor CYS TO THAK/SCOWCROFT
CY
FOR
MEMO FOR HAK
(
)
STAFF SECRETARY
MEMO FOR PRES
(
)
REPLY FOR
FAR EAST
(
)
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
APPROPRIATE ACTION
(
)
DISTRIBUTION/INITIAL ACTION ASGMT
MID EAST / NO. AFRICA / so. ASIA
MEMO
TO
(
)
EUROPE / CANADA
RECOMMENDATIONS
-
)
LATIN AMERICA
JOINT MEMO
(
)
UNITED NATIONS
REFER TO
FOR:
(
)
ECONOMIC
ANY ACTION NECESSARY?
(
)
SCIENTIFIC
CONCURRENCE
(
)
PROGRAM ANALYSIS
DUE DATE:
NSC PLANNING
COMMENTS: (INCLUDING SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS)
CONGRESSIONAL
OCEANS POLICY
INTELLIGENCE
DATE
FROM
TO
$
9/25
Lak
Jalker SUBSEQUENT ACTION REQUIRED he (OR AKEN): (9-26) CY
TO
X
9/30
NSCLS
C
Noted by Pres
SUBSEQUENT ROUTING/ACTIONS
9/25
addton/ Recd state memo 7518892
R. FORD
GERALD
DISPATCH
CY RQMTS: SEE ABOVE PLUS:
MICROFILM & FILE RQMTS:
NSC/S DISP INSTR
NOTIFY
& DATE
BY
OCTSEPS ID:
BY
SPECIAL DISPOSITION:
27 1975
SF
CROSS REF W/ 7506207
SUSPENSE CY ATTACHED: yes
OPEN 19TH THE
HP
NS
FOLDER:
CLOSE
EP
PA
DY
(
NSC 75-22
575-600
)
UNCLAS
ZCZCCDS263
00 WTE3
DE WTE 5532 2711400
0 281419Z SEP 75
FM THE SITUATION ROOM
TO CAMP DAVID; MILAIDE FOR THE PRESIDENT
ZEM
UNCLAS WH51893
MR4
TO:
THE PRESIDENT
FROM:
GENERAL SCOWCROFT
1. FOLLOWING IS FULL TEXT OF SPEECH DELIVERED BY
PRC FOREIGN MINISTER CHIAO KUAN-HUA TO THE 30TH
GENERAL ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 26, 1975.
QUOTE MR. PRESIDENT,
PROFOUND CHANGES HAVE TAKEN PLACE IN THE INTERNATIONAL
SITUATION SINCE THE 29TH SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
GENERAL ASSEMBLY. A SERIOUS CAPITALIST ECONOMIC CRISIS PLAGUES
MOST PARTS OF THE WORLD. ALL THE BASIC CONTRADICTIONS IN THE
WORLD ARE FURTHER SHARPENING. THE TREND OF REVOLUTION BYTHE
PEOPLE OF THE WORLD IS ACTIVELY DEVELOPING. THE ASIAN, AFRICAN
AND LATIN AMERICAN PEOPLES HAVE ADVANCED VALIANTLY AND WON A
SERIES OF SIGNIFICANT VICTORIES IN THEIR STRUGGLE AGAINST
COLONIALISM, IMPERIALISM AND HEGEMONISM. ON THE OTHER HAND,
THE CONTENTION BETWEEN THE TWO SUPERPOWERS FOR WORLD HEGEMONY
HAS BECOME MORE AND MORE INTENSE. THE WHOLE WORLD IS IN GREATER
TURBULENCE AND UNREST. RHETORIC ABOUT DETENTE CANNOT COVER
UP THE STARK REALITY. THE DANGER OF WAR IS VISIBLY GROWING.
FIRST OF ALL, IT SHOULD BE POINTED OUT THAT THE GREAT VICTORY
OF THE THREE INDOCHINESE PEOPLES HAS SHAKEN THE WORLD. THE
CAMOBIDAN AND VIETNAMESE PEOPLES HAVE THOROUGHLY DEFEATED U.S.
IMPERIALISM AND ITS LACKEYS, THUS MAKING AN IMPORTANT CONTRI-
BUTION TO THE ANTI-IMPERIALIST CAUSE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE
WORLD AND GREATLY INSPIRING ALL OPPRESSED NATIONS AND OPPRESS-
ED PEOPLE. THEIR VICTORY IS A BRILLIANT EXAMPLE SHOWING
THAT A WEAK NATION CAN DEFEAT A STRONG, AND A SMALL NATION
CAN DEFEAT A BIG.
THE PEOPLES OF ASIA ARE STRONGLY AGAINST SUPERPOWER
INTERFERENCE AND CONTROL AND AGAINST THE ATTEMPT OF ANY COUN-
TRY TO SEEK HEGEMONY IN ANY PART OF ASIA. THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN
COUNTRIES WANT THEIR REGION TO BECOME A ZONE OF PEACE, FREEDOM
AND NEUTRALITY, FREE FROM ANY FORM OR MANNER OF INTERFERENCE
BY OUTSIDE POWERS. THIS POSITION OF THEIRS HAS WON THE RECOG-
R.
FORD
NITION AND RESPECT OF AN INCREASING NUMBER OF COUNTRIES. THE
STRUGGLE OF THE SOUTH ASIAN PEOPLES AGAINST EXPANSIONISM AND
GERALD
HEGEMONISM HAS MADE NEW PROGRESS. IN WEST ASIA, LONG-STANDING
LISEARY
DISPUTES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED BY THE COUNTRIES CONCERNED WHICH
EXCLUDED FOREIGN INFLUENCE AND CONDUCTED CONSULTATIONS ON AN
END OF PAGE 01
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
EQUAL FOOTING, THUS CREATING FAVOURABLE CONDITIONS FOR FRIENDLY
COOPERATION AMONG THE COUNTRIES IN THE REGION. THE GULF COUN-
TRIES ARE GETTING UNITED IN THE COMMON STRUGGLE AGAINST SUPER-
POWER INFILTRATION AND CONTROL.
IN AFRICA, MOZAMBIQUE, CAPE VERDE, SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE
AND THE COMOROS HAVE ACHIEVED INDEPENDENCE ONE AFTER ANOTHER.
THIS IS THE RESULT OF THEIR PERSISTENCE IN PROTRACTED STRUGGLES,
PARTICULARLY IN PROTRACTED ARMED STRUGGLES. THE STRUGGLE OF
THE PEOPLE OF ZIMBABWE, NAMIBIA AND AZANIA AGAINST RACISM AND
WHITE RULE IS DEVELOPING IN DEPTH. THE SITUATION ON THE AFRICAN
CONTINENT IS MOST ENCOURAGING.
THE STRUGGLE OF THE LATIN AMERICAN PEOPLES TO COMBAT
IMPERIALISM AND HEGEMONISM, SAFEGUARD STATE SOVEREIGNTY AND
DEFEND THEIR NATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCES AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS
AND INTERESTS HAS CONTINUED TO SURGE FORWARD. THEY HAVE REIN-
FORCED IN VARIOUS WAYS THEIR UNITY IN THE STRUGGLE.
FURTHERMORE, WE ARE PLEASED TO SEE THAT IN OCEANIA PAPUA
NEW GUINEA HAS ACHIEVED ITS NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE RECENTLY.
IN ORDER TO CHANGE THE OLD INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER
AND OPPOSE THE SHIFTING OF ECONOMIC CRISES, THE THIRD WORLD
COUNTRIES HAVE, IN PURSUANCE OF THE DECLARATION AND PROGRAMME
OF ACTION ADOPTED BY THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY AT ITS SIXTH
SPECIAL SESSION, ADVANCED MANY REASONABLE PROPOSALS AND WAGED
UNREMITTING STRUGGLES AT VARIOUS CONFERENCES AND ACHIEVED
MARKED SUCCESSES.
THE UNITY AND STRUGGLE OF THE THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES,
EXTENDING FROM THE POLITICAL TO THE ECONOMIC SPHERE, HAVE
USHERED IN A NEW STAGE IN THE REVOLUTIONARY CAUSE OF THE
PEOPLE OF THE WORLD AGAINST COLONIALISM, IMPERIALISM AND
HEGEMONISM.
THE COUNTRIES OF THE SECOND WORLD HAVE ALSO HEIGHTENED
THEIR STRUGGLE AGAINST SUPERPOWER AND PARTICULARLY SOCIAL-
IMPERIALIST CONTROL, INTERVENTION, SUBVERSION AND THREAT OF
FORCE. THE TREND AMONG THE WEST EUROPEAN COUNTRIES TO GET
UNITED AGAINST HEGEMONISM HAS CONTINUED TO GROW. THE SECOND
WORLD HAS INCREASED ITS DIALOGUE AND CONTACTS WITH THE THIRD
WORLD. SUCH COOPERATION WILL DOUBTLESS HAVE GOOD PROSPECTS
FOR DEVELOPMENT AS LONG AS IT IS BASED ON MUTUAL RESPECT FOR
SOVEREIGNTY AND EQUALITY.
THE CONTENTION BETWEEN THE TWO SUPERPOWERS, THE UNITED
STATES AND THE SOVIET UNION, EXTENDS TO ALL PARTS OF THE WORLD.
THEY ARE INTENSIFYING THEIR STRIFE IN EUROPE, THE MEDITER-
RANEAN, THE MIDDLE EAST, THE PERSIAN GULF, THE INDIAN OCEAN,
THE PACIFIC, THE ATLANTIC, ASIA, AFRICA AND LATIN AMERICA.
STRATEGICALLY, EUROPE IS THE FOCUS OF THEIR CONTENTION.
SOCIAL-IMPERIALISM IS MAKING A FEINT TO THE EAST WHILE ATTACKING
in
FORD
IN THE WEST. THIS WAS REVEALED, RATHER THAN COVERED UP, BY
THE CONFERENCE ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE. THE TWO
GERALD
SUPERPOWERS DO REACH SOME AGREEMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME, BUT
LISRARY
THESE ONLY ERECT A FACADE, BEHIND WHICH THEY ARE ENGAGED IN
END OF PAGE 02
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
BIGGER AND FIERCER CONTENTION.
TAKE FOR EXAMPLE THE AGREEMENT IN PRINCIPLE REACHED AT
THE U.S.-SOVIET SUMMIT MEETING LAST NOVEMBER ON THE LIMITATION
OF STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS. THIS AGREEMENT ONLY SETS A NUME-
RICAL LIMIT ON THE ARMS IN QUESTION, WHICH EXCEEDS THE AMOUNT
EACH SIDE POSSESSES AT THE MOMENT, WHILE QUALITATIVELY IT SETS
NO LIMIT AT ALL. IT IS EVIDENT, THEREFORE, THAT SUCH AN AGREE-
MENT SHOULD MORE APPROPRIATELY BE CALLED AN AGREEMENT ON STRA-
TEGIC ARMS EXPANSION RATHER THAN AN AGREEMENT ON STRATEGIC
ARMS LIMITATION. FACTS ARE AT HAND TO PROVE THIS. SINCE THE
SIGNING OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE UNITED STATES AND THE SOVIET
UNION HAVE BOTH STEPPED UP THEIR DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF
NEW-TYPE STRATEGIC ARMS, EACH TRYING HARD TO OVERPOWER THE
OTHER.
OF LATE, THE SOVIET UNION HAS MADE USE OF THE CONCLU-
SION OF THE EUROPEAN SECURITY CONFERENCE TO TURN OUT MUCH
PROPAGANDA ALLEGING THAT DETENTE HAS PROGRESSED TO A NEW STAGE.
THIS IS SHEER DECEPTIVE TALK. WE ARE AWARE OF THE EAGER DESIRE
FOR SECURITY ON THE PART OF THE MANY SMALL AND MEDIUM COUNTRIES
WHICH PARTICIPATED IN THAT CONFERENCE. WE ARE ALSO AWARE
THAT THEY HAVE NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT ITS AGREEMENTS WHICH HAVE NO
BINDING FORCE. WHAT SECURITY, LET ALONE DETENTE, IS THERE TO
SPEAK OF WHEN EUROPE REMAINS IN THE PROLONGED STATE OF TENSE
ARMED CONFRONTATION? WHILE CHANTING "PEACE AND SECURITY"
IN THE CONFERENCE HALL, THE SOVIET UNION MADE MOVES TO AGGRA-
VATE TENSION OUTSIDE. IT NOT ONLY CONCENTRATED MASSIVE MILITARY
FORCES AND CARRIED OUT UNBRIDLED PROVOCATIONS IN THE SEAS OF
NORTHERN EUROPE AND THE MEDITERRANEAN, BUT ALSO BRAZENLY
STRETCHED ITS TENTACLES TO THE IBERIAN PENINSULA. SUCH DEEDS
OF EXPANSION COUPLED WITH WORDS OF DETENTE ARE A HUGE MOCKERY
OF THE EUROPEAN SECURITY CONFERENCE. FROM ITS INCEPTION WE
CONSIDERED THE EUROPEAN SECURITY CONFERENCE A EUROPEAN INSE-
CURITY CONFERENCE. NOW THAT THIS CONFERENCE HAS ENDED, IS
THERE GREATER SECURITY IN EUROPE? IN OUR VIEW, NO. IT HAS
NOT ALTERED THE BASIC SITUATION IN EUROPE IN THE LEAST. IF
ONE SHOULD BE SO NAIVE AS TO BELIEVE IN THE SOVIET PROPAGANDA,
THAT WOULD BE DANGEROUS INDEED.
THE SOVIET LEADERSHIP HANKERS AFTER A SO-CALLED "ASIAN
COLLECTIVE SECURITY SYSTEM." NOW THAT THE EUROPEAN SECURITY
CONFERENCE HAS BEEN A SUCCESS, AS THEY SAY, WE ASIAN COUNTRIES
SHOULD LEARN FROM ITS EXAMPLE. WHAT A BRIGHT IDEA! THE SITUA-
TION IN ASIA, HOWEVER, IS DIFFERENT FROM THAT IN EUROPE. IT
WAS ONLY A SHORT WHILE AGO THAT A SUPERPOWER WAS DRIVEN OUT
OF INDOCHINA. SO THE PURPOSE OF THE SOVIET UNION IS NOT THE
PRESERVATION OF ASIAN SECURITY; RATHER IT IS TO "FILL THE
VACUUM" AND AT THE SAME TIME DIVERT WORLD ATTENTION TO ASIA
=
FORD
TO COVER UP THE FACTTHAT EUROPE IS THE FOCUS OF ITS STRATEGY.
AS FOR THE PRINCIPLE OF THE INVIOLABILITY OF EXISTING FRONTIERS
THAT WAS STRESSED AT THE EUROPEAN SECURITY CONFERENCE, WHAT
GERALD
LISAARY
IMPLICATIONS WOULD IT HAVE IN ASIA? IS IT THAT THE SOVIET
END OF PAGE 03
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
UNION WANTS US TO RECOGNIZE AS LEGAL ITS OCCUPATION OF THE
TERRITORIES OF SOME ASIAN COUNTRIES WHILE AT THE SAME TIME
ALLOWING IT TO RESERVE THE RIGHT TO SUPPORT ONE ASIAN COUNTRY
IN VIOLATING THE EXISTING FRONTIERS OF ANOTHER, AS IT DID IN
1971? TO PUT IT BLUNTLY, THE IDEA OF A SO-CALLED "ASIAN
COLLECIIVE SECURITY SYSTEM" PEDDLED BY THE SOVIET LEADERSHIP
IS DESIGNED TO FACILITATE ITS CONTENTION WITH THE OTHER SUPER-
POWER FOR HEGEMONY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION AND SERVES AS
A MEANS BY WHICH IT SEEKS TO DIVIDE AND CONTROL THE ASIAN
COUNTRIES. BUT THE ASIAN COUNTRIES, WHICH WON THEIR INDEPEN-
DENCE AFTER PROTRACTED STRUGGLES, KNOW WELL THAT IN ORDER TO
BE MASTERS OF THEIR OWN HOUSE THEY MUST NEVER "LET THE TIGER
IN THROUGH THE BACK DOOR WHILE REPULSING THE WOLF THROUGH THE
FRONT GATE." CHINA'S ATTITUDE TOWARDS THIS STUFF OF "ASIAN
COLLECTIVE SECURITY SYSTEM" IS CLEAR-CUT: FIRST, WE ARE AGAINST
IT; SECOND, WE DESPISE IT.
AS LENIN POINTED OUT TIME AND AGAIN, IMPERIALISM MEANS
WAR. SO LONG AS IMPERIALISM AND SOCIAL-IMPERIALISM EXIST,
WAR IS INEVITABLE. THE CONTENT OF IMPERIALIST POLITICS IS
WORLD DOMINATION, AND THE CONTINUATION OF THIS POLITICS IS
IMPERIALIST WAR. SINCE BOTH SUPERPOWERS ARE AFTER WORLD
DOMINATION, THE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN THEM IS IRRECONCILABLE;
ONE EITHER OVERPOWERS THE OTHER, OR IS OVERPOWERED. THE
SO-CALLED "BALANCE OF POWER," EVEN IF IT EXISTS, IS ONLY A
TRANSIENT AND SUPERFICIAL ONE. IT WILL NOT DO TO DEPEND ON
A "BALANCE OF POWER" OR A SO-CALLED "BALANCE OF TERROR" FOR
MAINTAINING PEACE. KHRUSHCHOV'S BRAINCHILD THAT PEACEFUL
COEXISTENCE IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE IN THIS NUCLEAR AGE IS
A HYPOCRITICAL LIE. IF THE SOVIET UNION TOOK THIS STUFF
SERIOUSLY, WHY SHOULD IT FRANTICALLY DEVELOP CONVENTIONAL ARMED
FORCES IN ADDITION TO ENERGETICALLY DEVELOPING NUCLEAR ARMS,
AND MAINTAIN AN OFFENSIVE POSTURE FAR EXCEEDING ITS DEFENCE
NEEDS? WITH THE SUPERPOWRRS CONTENDING SO FIERCELY AND
EXPANDING THEIR ARMAMENTS so MADLY, THEY ARE BOUND TO GO TO
WAR AGAINST EACH OTHER SOME DAY. THIS IS INDEPENDENT OF MAN'S
WILL. THE SUPERPOWERS ARE THE SOURCE OF A NEW WORLD WAR, AND
THE DANGER OF WAR COMES MAINLY FROM THE WILDLY AMBITIOUS SOCIAL-
IMPERIALISM. THE FREQUENT MEETINGS BETWEEN THE SUPERPOWERS
AND THEIR PROFUSE TALK ABOUT DETENTE PRECISELY PROVE THAT
THERE IS NO DETENTE, LET ALONE LASTING PEACE, IN THIS WORLD.
WHAT CHARACTERIZES THE CURRENT WORLD SITUATION IS DECIDEDLY
NOT AN IRREVERSIBLE PROCESS OF DETENTE BUT THE APPROACHING
DANGER OF A NEW WORLD WAR.
WE HOPE THAT THE PEOPLE OF ALL COUNTRIES WILL HEIGHTEN
THEIR VIGILANCE AND GET PREPARED AGAINST THE GROWING DANGER
FORD
OF A NEW WORLD WAR. IT IS BETTER TO BE PREPARED THAN UNPREPARED.
WITHOUT PREPARATIONS ONE WILL SUFFER. THE SUPERPOWERS LOOK
STRONG BUT ARE INWARDLY WEAK AND VERY ISOLATED. THE MORE EVILS
LIBRARY
THEY DO, THE MORE THOROUGHLY THEY WILL REVEAL THEIR TRUE FEA-
TURES, AND THE STRONGER THE RESISTANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE
END OF PAGE 04
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
WORLD WILL BECOME. AT PRESENT, THE FACTORS FOR BOTH REVOLU-
TION AND WAR ARE INCREASING ON A WORLD SCALE. WHETHER WAR
GIVES RISE TO REVOLUTION OR REVOLUTION PREVENTS WAR, IN EITHER
CASE THE INTERNATIONAL SITUATION WILL DEVELOP IN A DIRECTION
FAVOURABLE TO THE PEOPLE. AND THE FUTURE OF THE WORLD WILL
BE BRIGHT.
MR. PRESIDENT,
NUMEROUS QUESTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE CURRENT
SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY. THE CHINESE DELEGATION WOULD
LIKE TO STATE OUR VIEWS ON SOME OF THEM.
I. THE QUESTION OF OPPOSING COLONIALISM
THE PAST YEAR WAS A YEAR IN WHICH THE AFRICAN PEOPLE
CONTINUED TO WIN IMPORTANT VICTORIES IN THEIR STRUGGLE FOR
NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE AND LIBERATION. WITH THE COLLAPSE OF
THE PORTUGUESE COLONIAL SYSTEM AND THE GLORIOUS BIRTH OF A
NUMBER OF NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES, THE AFRICAN NATIONAL LIBE-
RATION MOVEMENT HAS ADVANCED TO A NEW STAGE, AND THE LAST
STRONGHOLDS OF COLONIALISM IN SOUTHERN AFRICA ARE ASSAILED
FROM ALL SIDES BY THE MULTITUDE OF AFRICAN PEOPLE AND COUNTRIES
PERSISTING IN STRUGGLE.
BUT EVEN BEFORE OLD-LINE COLONIALISM DIES OUT, THE TWO
SUPERPOWERS HAVE ALREADY STEPPED IN. THEUNITED STATES HAS
LONG SUPPORTED COLONIAL RULE IN AFRICA, AND SOUTHERN AFRICA
IN PARTICULAR. THE SOVIET UNION, FLAUNTING THE BANNER OF
"SOCIALISM," HAS INFILTRATED INTO THE AFRICAN NATIONAL LIBE-
RATION MOVEMENT TO SOW DISCORD AND STIR UP TROUBLE IN AN
ATTEMPT TO BRING THE MOVEMENT WITHIN ITS SOCIAL-IMPERIALIST ORBIT.
ALL REVOLUTIONARY PEOPLE OF THE WORLD ARE SADDENED BY THE
CIVIL WAR IN ANGOLA. DIFFERENCES WITHIN A NATIONAL LIBERATION
MOVEMENT ARE SOMETHING NORMAL. THE CORRECT ATTITUDE IS TO
ENCOURAGE UNITY IN THEIR COMMON STRUGGLE TO COMBAT THE ENEMY
AND DRIVE OUT THE COLONIALISTS. THAT IS WHY THE ORGANIZATION
OF AFRICAN UNITY HAS RECOGNIZED AND SUPPORTED ALL THE THREE
LIBERATION ORGANIZATIONS IN ANGOLA ENGAGED IN ARMED STRUGGLE
AND HAS MADE TIRELESS EFFORTS TO PROMOTE UNITY IN THE
ANGOLAN NATIONAL LIBERATION MOVEMENT. BUT THE SOVIET LEADER-
SHIP WHICH CONSIDERS ITSELF AS THE PATRON OF THE NATIONAL LIBE-
RATION MOVEMENT DISREGARDS THE AGREEMENT REACHED AMONG THE THREE
ANGOLAN ORGANIZATIONS ON UNITY AGAINST THE ENEMY AND HAS, THROUGH
ITS PROPAGANDA MEDIA, IDENTIFIED ONE ORGANIZATION AS REVOLU-
TIONARY AND CENSURED ANOTHER AS REACTIONARY IN A DELIBERATE
ATTEMPT TO CREATE DIVISION. FURTHERMORE, IT HAS SENT LARGE
QUANTITIES OF ARMS, INCLUDING HEAVY ARMS, TO ONE OF THE ANGOLAN
ORGANIZATIONS. THAT WAS HOW THE CIVIL WAR WAS PROVOKED IN
ANGOLA. THE OTHER SUPERPOWER, ON ITS PART, HAS NOT LAGGED
BEHIND. THE SITUATION IN ANGOLA IS BECOMING EVER MORE
i
FORD
COMPLICATED.
FROM THE VERY BEGINNING CHINA HAS GIVEN HER SUPPORT TO
GERALD
THE NATIONAL LIBERATION MOVEMENT IN ANGOLA. WE GAVE MILITARY
LIBRARY
AID TO ALL THREE ANGOLAN LIBERATION ORGANIZATIONS TO HELP THEM
END OF PAGE 05
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
FIGHT PORTUGUESE COLONIALISM. BEING AWARE OF THEIR DIFFERENCES,
WE HAVE ALL ALONG URGED THEM TO UNITE AGAINST THE ENEMY. AFTER
THE AGREEMENT ON INDEPENDENCE WAS REACHED BETWEEN THE
ANGOLAN NATIONAL LIBERATION MOVEMENT AND PORTUGAL, WE STOPPED
GIVING NEW MILITARY AID TO THE THREE ANGOLAN ORGANIZATIONS.
SUCH ARE THE FACTS, AND FACTS ARE MORE ELOQUENT THAN WORDS.
THE SOVIET SLANDERS AGAINST CHINA CAN IN NO WAY COVER UP THE
TRUTH; INSTEAD, THEY SERVE TO LAY BARE THE TRUE FEATURES OF
THE SOVIET UNION.
THE CIVIL WAR IN ANGOLA INSTIGATED BY THE SOVIET UNION
IS A BAD THING, BUT A GOOD THING TOO. IT IS GOOD PRECISELY
BECAUSE IT SERVES AS TEACHING MATERIAL BY NEGATIVE EXAMPLE.
ALL REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENTS ARE BOUND TO GO THROUGH TWISTS AND
TURNS. WE BELIEVE THAT THE BROAD MASSES OF THE ANGOLAN PEOPLE,
AFTER EXPERIENCING SETBACKS AND DETOURS, WILL CERTAINLY UPHOLD
UNITY, PERSIST IN STRUGGLE, FRUSTRATE THE SUPERPOWER AND PARTI-
CULARLY SOCIAL-IMPERIALIST SCHEMES AND ACHIEVE THEIR INDEPEN-
DENCE AND LIBERATION. THEIRTEMPORARY DIFFICULTIES AND SACRI-
FICES WILL NOT ONLY GREATLY ENHANCE THEIR OWN POLITICAL AWARENESS,
BUT PROVIDE A PROFOUND LESSON FOR THE LIBERATION MOVEMENTS OF
THE OPPRESSED NATIONS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
AS EXCELLENT SITUATION PREVAILS IN AFRICA. IT WAS
BECAUSE THE RACISTS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA WERE DRIVEN INTO A
CORNER THAT VORSTER OF SOUTH AFRICA PROPOSED "DIALOGUE" BETWEEN
THE MINORITY WHITE REGIME OF SOUTHERN RHODESIA AND THE ZIMBABWE
NATIONAL LIBERATION ORGANIZATIONS. THIS SIGNIFIES ONLY THE
WEAKNESS OF THE RACISTS AND NOT AT ALL THEIR STRENGTH. THROUGH
SUCH TACTICS THEY INTEND TO DISINTEGRATE THE NATIONAL LIBERA-
TION MOVEMENT AND TO PRESERVE THE REACTIONARY WHITE RULE.
THE RECENT CONFERENCE OF HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT OF THE
ORGANIZATION OF AFRICAN UNITY PENETRATINGLY STATED THAT "VORSTER'S
DETENTE MANOEUVRES ON RHODESIA ARE A TRANSPARENT TRICK TO FRUS-
TRATE MAJORITY RULE AND TO DISARM THE FREEDOM-FIGHTERS." THE
CONFERENCE STRESSED THE NECESSITY OF ARMED STRUGGLE, CALLED
ON THE ZIMBABWE PEOPLE TO IMMEDIATELY INTENSIFY THEIR ARMED
STRUGGLE AND EXPRESSED THE DETERMINATION TO FIGHT BY EVERY
MEANS POSSIBLE THE WHITE RACIST REGIMES UNTIL THEIR COMPLETE
ELIMINATION. WE WARMLY SUPPORT THIS CORRECT STAND. WE HAVE
ALWAYS ADVOCATED THE USE OF REVOLUTIONARY DUAL TACTICS AGAINST
THE RACTIONARIES' COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY DUAL TACTICS. ARMED
STRUGGLE IS FUNDAMENTAL; THE PEOPLE'S ARMED FORCES MUST BE
STRENGTHENED AND NOT WEAKENED, NEGOTIATIONS OR NO NEGOTIATIONS.
DEVIATIONS AND DETOURS MAY SOMETIMES OCCUR IN THE COMPLICATED
STRUGGLE AGAINST COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY DUAL TACTICS. BUT THE
PEOPLE WILL SUM UP THEIR EXPERIENCE, OVERCOME DIFFICULTIES
AND CONTINUE TO ADVANCE. THROUGH LONG AND TORTUOUS STRUGGLES
i
FORD
THE PEOPLE OF SOUTHERN AFRICA WILL EVENTUALLY WIN THE COMPLETE
LIBERATION OF THE AFRICAN CONTINENT.
GENALD
II. THE KOREAN QUESTION
LIBRARY
THE INDEPENDENT AND PEACEFUL REUNIFICATION OF KOREA
END OF PAGE 06
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
IS THE COMMON ASPIRATION OF THE ENTIRE KOREAN PEOPLE. OVER
THE YEARS THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA HAS
PUT FORWARD MANY REASONABLE PROPOSALS AND PROPOSITIONS FOR
THE PEACEFUL REUNIFICATION OF THE FATHERLAND. THANKS TO
ITS INITIATIVE, AN AGREEMENT WAS REACHED WITH THE SOUTH
KOREAN AUTHORITIES IN 1972 ON THE THREE PRINCIPLES FOR IN-
DEPENDENT AND PEACEFUL REUNIFICATION, WHICH WERE AFFIRMED
BY THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN 1973. HOWEVER, KOREA RE-
MAINS DIVIDED TODAY, BECAUSE THE PAK JUNG HI CLIQUE, SUPPORTED
BY THE UNITED STATES, HAS ABANDONED THESE PRINCIPLES AND SABO-
TAGED THE NORTH-SOUTH TALKS.
UNDER THE IMPACT OF THE GREAT VICTORY OF THE INDO-
CHINESE PEOPLES THIS YEAR, U.S. IMPERIALISM BECAME PANICKY.
IT ENDLESSLY REPEATED THE MYTH OF A SO-CALLED "THREAT
OF A SOUTHWARD INVASION FROM THE NORTH" CONCOCTED BY THE
PAK JUNG HI CLIQUE, DELIBERATELY PLAYED UP THE TENSION ON
THE KOREAN PENINSULA AND EVEN DECLARED THAT IT WOULD NOT
HESITATE TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS THERE. BACKED AND ABETTED
BY THE UNITED STATES, THE PAK JUNG HI CLIQUE PURSUED ITS POLICY
OF NATIONAL DIVISION WITH GREATER FRENZY, ISSUED A SUCCESSION
OF "EMERGENCY LAWS", DECLARED A STATE OF WAR AND INTENSIFIED
ITS SUPPRESSION OF THE PEOPLE IN SOUTH KOREA. IT LOOKED AS
IF A KOREAN WAR WERE TOUCH AND GO. AS A MATTER OF FACT, THAT
WAS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. IT IS NOW CLEAR THAT THE UNITED
STATES AND THE PAK JUNG HI CLIQUE HAVE ACTED IN THIS WAY MERELY
TO CREATE A PRETEXT AND DECEIVE THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD SO THAT
U.S. TROOPS MAY HANG ON IN SOUTH KOREA AND THE DIVISION OF
KOREA MAY BE PERPETUATED. IF THERE IS A DANGER OF WAR ON THE
KOREAN PENINSULA, IT CAN ONLY ORIGINATE FROM THE SOUTH KOREAN
AUTHORITIES THAT CONSTANTLY CLAMOUR FOR "REUNIFICATION BY
PREVAILING OVER COMMUNISM," AND ABSOLUTELY NOT FROM THE
DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA WHICH INSISTS ON INDE-
PENDENT AND PEACEFUL REUNIFICATION.
THE DRAFT RESOLUTION ON KOREA SUBMITTED BY THE UNITED
STATES, JAPAN AND OTHER COUNTRIES THIS YEAR CLAIMS A
"PREPAREDNESS" TO TERMINATE THE UNITED NATIONS COMMAND. BUT
THERE IS NO MENTION AT ALL OF THE WITHDRAWAL OF FOREIGN
TROOPS FROM SOUTH KOREA. OBVIOUSLY, ITS PURPOSE IS, UNDER THE
COVER OF TERMINATING THE U.N. COMMAND, TO LEGALIZE THE PRESENCE
OF U.S. TROOPS IN SOUTH KOREA AND CREATE "TWO KOREAS." THE
U.S. ATTEMPT TO THRUST THE PAK JUNG HI CLIQUE INTO THE UNITED
NATIONS IS PART OF THIS SCHEME. CLEARLY, SUCH A DRAFT RESOLUTION
CAN BY NO MEANS LEAD TO A PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF THE KOREAN
QUESTION, NO MATTER HOW NICELY IT IS WORDED. IT IS ABSOLUTELY
UNACCEPTABLE TO US.
WE HAVE CONSISTENTLY HELD THAT THE KOREAN QUESTION SHOULD
&
FORD
BE SETTLED BY THE KOREAN PEOPLE THEMSELVES FREE FROM ANY
OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE. THE DRAFT RESOLUTION ON KOREA SUB-
MITTED BY ALGERIA, CHINA AND OTHER COUNTRIES PROPOSES THAT
GERALD
LIBRARY
THE UNITED NATIONS COMMAND BE DISSOLVED AND ALL THE FOREIGN
END OF PAGE 07
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
TROOPS STATIONED IN SOUTH KOREA UNDER THE FLAG OF THE
UNITED NATIONS BE WITHDRAWN, AND THAT THE KOREAN ARMISTICE
AGREEMENT BE REPLACED WITH A PEACE AGREEMENT SIGNED BY THE
REAL PARTIES TO THE ARMISTICE AGREEMENT. IT ALSO PUTS FORWARD
A SERIES OF POSITIVE MEASURES TO REMOVE TENSION BETWEEN NORTH
AND SOUTH KOREA, PREVENT ARMED CONFLICTS AND PROMOTE THE
NORMALIZATION OF THE SITUATION. THIS PROPOSAL IS ENTIRELY
JUST AND REASONABLE. IT NOT ONLY MEETS THE EAGER DESIRE OF
THE ENTIRE KOREAN PEOPLE BUT IS CONDUCIVE TO THE FUNDAMENTAL
IMPROVEMENT OF THE SITUATION ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA AND IN
NORTHEAST ASIA.
THE UNITED NATIONS COMMAND MUST BE DISSOLVED. FROM
THE DAY OF ITS FORMATION IT HAS BEEN ILLEGAL AND A TOOL OF
U.S. AGGRESSION. IN FACT, IT HAS BECOME A U.S. COMMAND LONG
SINCE.
HOWEVER, THE DISSOLUTION OF THE U.N. COMMAND MUST BE
COUPLED WITH THE WITHDRAWAL OF ALL THE FOREIGN TROOPS FROM
SOUTH KOREA. FOR WHAT WOULD BE THE POINT OF MERELY CHANGING
THE NAME WHILE KEEPING EVERYTHING ELSE INTACT? CONTINUED
PRESENCE OF U.S. TROOPS IN SOUTH KOREA UNDER WHATEVER NAME
CONTRAVENES THE PRINCIPLES OF THE INDEPENDENT AND PEACEFUL
REUNIFICATION OF KOREA AND WILL ONLY AGGRAVATE THE TENSION
ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA. THE QUESTION OF WITHDRAWAL OF ALL
THE FOREIGN TROOPS FROM KOREA SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED AND
SETTLED WITHIN THREE MONTHS AFTER THE SIGNING OF THE KOREAN
ARMISTICE AGREEMENT. THIS HAS BEEN DEALYED FOR NO LESS THAN
TWENTY-TWO YEARS BECAUSE OF OBSTRUCTIONS PLACED BY SUCCESSIVE
AMERICAN ADMINISTRATIONS. AND SEVENTEEN YEARS HAVE PASSED SINCE
THE CHINESE PEOPLE'S VOLUNTEERS WITHDREW ON THEIR OWN
INITIATIVE FROM THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA TO
FACILITATE A PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF THE KOREAN QUESTION. NOW
THERE ARE NO FOREIGN TROOPS IN NORTH KOREA, BUT U.S. TROOPS
STILL HANG ON IN SOUTH KOREA. FOR HOW MUCH LONGER DOES THE
UNITED STATES INTEND TO PROLONG SUCH A STATE OF AFFAIRS?
KOREA CANNOT REMAIN FOREVER IN A STATE OF ARMISTICE.
THE U.S. REPRESENTATIVE'S IDEA FOR THE UNITED STATES AND THE
SOUTH KOREAN AUTHORITIES TO PROPOSE TO THE PARTIES OF THE
ARMISTICE THE CONVENING OF A CONFERENCE TO DISCUSS WAYS TO
PRESERVE THE ARMISTICE AGREEMENT IS OF NO AVAIL. THE KOREAN
ARMISTICE AGREEMENT HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE FOR 22 YEARS, AND
HOW MUCH LONGER WILL IT BE PRESERVED? MOREOVER, AS IS KNOWN
TO ALL, THE PARTIES OF THE KOREAN ARMISTICE AGREEMENT HAVE IN
FACT CHANGED A GREAT DEAL. THE CHINESE PEOPLE'S VOLUNTEERS
WITHDREW FROM KOREA LONG AGO. MOST COMPONENTS OF THE UNITED
NATIONS COMMAND HAVE DISPERSED AND EVAPORATED INTO THIN AIR.
FORD
SO HOW CAN SUCH A CONFERENCE BE CONVENED? AS FOR THE EXPLORA-
TION AT SUCH A CONFERENCE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF A LARGER CON-
FERENCE TO NEGOTIATE A MORE FUNDAMENTAL ARRANGEMENT, IS IT NOT
GERALD
LIBRARY
EVEN MORE IMPRACTICAL? AFTER THE ARMISTICE IN 1953, UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE ARMISTICE AGREEMENT A POLITICAL CONFERENCE
END OF PAGE 08
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
OF A HIGHER LEVEL SHOULD HAVE BEEN HELD TO SETTLE THE KOREAN
QUESTION. HOWEVER, OWING TO SABOTAGE BY THE UNITED STATES,
EVEN ITS PRELIMINARY TALKS FAILED TO PRODUCE ANY RESULT.
SUBSEQUENTLY IN 1954, THE KOREAN AND CHINESE SIDES MADE TREMENDOUS
EFFORTS IN GENEVA TO URGE THE CONVENING OF A POLITICAL CONFERENCE
OF A HIGHER LEVEL IN THE HOPE THAT A PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF
THE KOREAN QUESTION COULD BE REALIZED. AT THE TIME, THE U.S.
REPRESENTATIVE, STUBBORNLY AND ARBITRARILY CLINGING TO HIS
OWN COURSE, WENT SO FAR AS TO REFUSE TO REOPEN ANY DISCUSSIONS
ON THE KOREAN QUESTION IN THE FUTURE. THUS, THE UNITED STATES
SINGLEHANDEDLY SLAMMED THE DOOR TO A POLITICAL CONFERENCE ON
THE KOREAN QUESTION. IN THE ACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES AT PRESENT,
THE PRACTICAL WAY IS FOR THE REAL PARTIES TO THE KOREAN
ARMISTICE AGREEMENT TO NEGOTIATE AND SIGN A PEACE AGREEMENT TO
REPLACE THE ARMISTICE AGREEMENT. THE FACTS OVER THE PAST TWO
DECADES AND MORE PROVE THAT U.S. INTERFERENCE IN KOREA IS THE
ROOT CAUSE OF CONSTANT TENSIONS IN KOREA. THEREFORE, THE KEY
TO A PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF THE KOREAN QUESTION LIES IN THE
CONCLUSION OF A PEACE AGREEMENT TO REPLACE THE ARMISTICE
AGREEMENT AND IN THE WITHDRAWAL OF ALL U.S. TROOPS.
THE UNITED STATES ASSERTS THAT AS THERE IS NO NORMAL
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY BETWEEN NORTH AND SOUTH KOREA, THE
ARMISTICE AGREEMENT AND THE DEMILITARIZED ZONE STIPULATED THEREIN
ABSOLUTELY MUST NOT BE CHANGED. WE CANNOT ACCEPT THIS VIEW.
KOREA IS ONLY IN A STATE OF TEMPORARY DIVISION. BETWEEN NORTH
AND SOUTH KOREA THERE CAN BE NO NORMAL INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY
BUT ONLY A PROVISIONAL DEMARCATION LINE. SINCE BOTH NORTH
AND SOUTH KOREA HAVE AGREED ON THE MUTUAL NON-USE OF FORCE AND
ON REUNIFICATION BY PEACEFUL MEANS, WHY SHOULD IT BE IMPOSSIBLE
FOR SOME NECESSARY MEASURES TO BE AGREED ON TO SETTLE THIS
PROBLEM PENDING THE PEACEFUL REUNIFICATION? IT IS GROUNDLESS
TO ASSERT THAT A WAR WILL BREAK OUT IN KOREA IN THE ABSENCE
OF THE ARMISTICE AGREEMENT.
THE CHINESE DELEGATION MAINTAINS THAT THE DRAFT RESOLUTION
ON KOREA SPONSORED BY ALGERIA AND OTHER COUNTRIES IS ONE THAT
CAN SOLVE THE PROBLEM. WE HOPE THAT THE CURRENT SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY WILL SERIOUSLY CONSIDER AND ADOPT THIS
DRAFT RESOLUTION.
III. THE MIDDLE EAST QUESTION
SINCE THE OCTOBER WAR, THE MIDDLE EAST HAS REVERTED TO
A STATE OF "NO WAR, NO PEACE." THIS IS THE RESULT OF THE
FIERCE AND MANY-SIDED CONTENTION BETWEEN THE TWO SUPERPOWERS
CARRIED ON AGAINST THE WILL OF THE ARAB AND PALESTINIAN PEOPLES.
DURING THIS PERIOD, DISENGAGEMENT AGREEMENTS WERE
SIGNED BETWEEN EGYPT AND ISRAEL AND BETWEEN SYRIA AND ISRAEL.
FORD
RECENTLY, A SECOND DISENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY
EGYPT AND ISRAEL. NEVERTHELESS, THE MIDDLE EAST QUESTION IS
FAR FROM BEING SETTLED.
GERALD
LIBRARY
IT IS MAINLY THE TWO SUPERPOWERS THAT ARE TO BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS STATE OF AFFAIRS. IN THE TWO YEARS SINCE
END OF PAGE 09
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
THE OCTOBER WAR, ONE SUPERPOWER PROPOSED A "COMPREHENSIVE
SOLUTION" AND THE OTHER A "STEP-BY-STEP SOLUTION" OF THE MIDDLE
EAST QUESTION, EACH TRYING HARD TO BOOST ITSELF AND DENIGRATE
THE OTHER AND MASQUERADE AS A FRIEND OF THE ARAB AND PALESTI-
NIAN PEOPLES. IN FACT, WHILE THE UNITED STATES HAS NO INTEN-
TION OF BRINGING ABOUT A THOROUGH SETTLEMENT OF THE MIDDLES
EAST QUESTION, THE SOVIET UNION IS STILL LESS INCLINED TO DO
SO. IT MAY BE RECALLED THAT WHEN THE OCTOBER WAR IN THE MIDDLE
EAST WAS AT ITS MOST CRITICAL JUNCTURE AND THEREAFTER, THE
SOVIET UNION WITHHELD THE SHIPMENT OF ARMS ALREADY PROMISED
TO EGYPT AND EVEN PRESSED FOR THE REPAYMENT OF DEBTS. HOW
CAN ONE EXPECT SUCH A PERFIDIOUS COUNTRY TO SUPPORT IN EARNEST
THE ARAB PEOPLE IN THEIR JUST STRUGGLE FOR THE RECOVERY OF THE
LOST TERRITORIES AND THE RESTORATION OF THE PALESTINIAN NATIONAL
RIGHTS?
BOTH SUPERPOWERS HAVE THE NEED TO MAINTAIN A STATE OF
"NO WAR, NO PEACE" IN THE MIDDLE EAST -- BRIEF FIGHTING FOL-
LOWED BY A PERIOD OF TRUCE, WITH BOTH WAR AND PEACE KEPT UNDER
CONTROL. TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THIS STATE OF AFFAIRS, THEY
CONTEND FOR SPHERES OF INFLUENCE, PLACES OF STRATEGIC IMPOR-
TANCE AND OIL RESOURCES IN THE MIDDLE EAST. TAKING ADVANTAGE
OF THE SAME, THEY SELL MUNITIONS IN ORDER TO REAP FABULOUS
PROFITS AND ALLEVIATE THEIR OWN ECONOMIC DIFFICULTIES. AGAIN
TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THIS, THEY TEXT NEW WEAPONS IN PREPARA-
TION FOR A NEW WAR ON A LARGER SCALE. ALL THIS IS DONE AT
THE EXPENSE OF THE FUNDAMENTAL INTEVESTS OF THE PEOPLE IN
THE MIDDLE EAST.
COUNTLESS AGREEMENTS ON THE MIDDLE EAST HAVE BEEN REACHED
INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED NATIONS IN THE PAST TWENTY-ODD
YEARS. NOW, IN RETROSPECT, IS THERE ANY AGREEMENT THAT HAS
BEEN STRICTLY OBSERVED BY THE ISRAELI AGRESSORS, OR THAT HAS
BROUGHT ABOUT A BASIC CHANGE IN THE MIDDLE EAST SITUATION?
NONE, PRACTICALLY NONE. IN THE FINAL ANALYSIS, IT IS NOT
AGREEMENTS ON PAPER BUT THE STRUGGLE OF THE PEOPLE THAT WILL
DETERMINE THE FUTURE OF THE MIDDLE EAST. WHAT CALLS FOR CLOSE
ATTENTION AND VIGILANCE NOW IS THAT A SUPERPOWER IS TAKING
ADVANTAGE OF THE PRESENT SITUATION TO SOW DISCORD AND ATTEMPT TO
UNDERMINE ARAB UNITY. THE ARAB AND PALESTINAIAN PEOPLES MUST
NEVER BE TAKEN IN.
THE CHINESE PEOPLE HAVE CONSISTENTLY SUPPORTED THE ARAB
AND PALESTINAIAN PEOPLES IN THEIR JUST STRUGGLE AGAINST THE
ISRAELI AGGRESSORS AND HAVE ALL ALONG OPPOSED SUPERPOWER CONTEN-
TION IN THE MIDDLE EAST. WE BELIEVE THAT THE PALESTINIAN AND
ARAB PEOPLES WILL CONTINUE TO STRENGTHEN THEIR UNITY, PERSEVERE
IN STRUGGLE AND CARRY THEIR FIGHT AGAINST AGGRESSION AND HEGE-
FORD
MONISM THROUGH TO THE END.
IV. THE QUESTION OF DISARMAMENT
DISARMAMENT IS AN OLD QUESTION. AT A TIME WHEN THERE
GERALD
LIBRARY
IS A GROWING DANGER OF A NEW WORLD WAR, IT IS FULLY UNDERS-
TANDABLE THAT THE PEOPLE OF ALL COUNTRIES, AND THOSE OF THE
END OF PAGE 10
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
THIRD AND SECOND WORLD COUNTRIES IN PARTICULAR, SHOULD FEEL
MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS QUESTION. AFTER THE EUROPEAN SECURITY
CONFERENCE, THE SOVIET LEADERSHIP HAS BECOME PARTICULARLY CLA-
MOUROUS FOR "COMPLEMENTING POLITICAL DETENTE BY MILITARY DETENTE,"
PREACHING THAT THE MOST IMPORTANT TASK NOW IS GENERAL AND
COMPLTE DISARMAMENT. THIS IS MAKING POLITICAL PROFIT OUT OF
THE WELL-INTENTIONED DESIRE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD. IT
IS A CALCULATED FRAUD.
ANYONE HAVING RESPECT FOR REALITIES CAN SEE THAT IN
EUROPE THERE IS NO POLITICAL DETENTE AT ALL BUT A FIERCE AND
ALL-SIDED CONTENTION BETWEEN THE TWO SUPERPOWERS. IMMEDIATELY
AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE EUROPEAN SECURITY CONFERENCE THE
SOVIET UNION VIOLATED NORWAY'S AIRSPACE. IS THIS NOT ANOTHER
PROOF THAT THE SO-CALLED DETENTE IS JUST EMPTY TALK? TO ADVOCATE
IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES THE EXPANDING, DEVELOPING IN DEPTH AND
SPREADING OF DETENTE CAN ONLY MAKE PEOPLE LAUGH THEIR HEADS OFF.
EXPLOITING THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES' KEEN DESIRE TO
DEVELOP THEIR NATIONAL ECONOMIES, THE SOVIET UNION RECENTLY
HHAS AGAIN TRUMPETED ITS PROPOSAL FOR A 10 PER CENT REDUCTION
OF THE MILITARY BUDGETS OF THE FIVE PERMANENT MEMBERS OF THE
SECURITY COUNCIL AND THE USE OF PART OF THE FUNDS THUS SAVED
TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. THE SOVIET
UNION DEEMS THIS PROPOSAL ITS MASTERSTROKE, AND ITS REPRESEN-
TATIVES HAVE TRIED TO SELL IT TO US HERE FOR NO ONE KNOWS HOW
MANY TIMES. BUT so FAR HE HAS FAILED TO INFORM US JUST HOW
BIG THE REAL SOVIET MILITARY BUDGET IS. IT WOULD PROBABLY TAKE
SEVERAL YEARS TO GET THIS CLEAR. AND WHO KNOWS HOW MANY MORE
BEFORE MILITARY BUDGETS CAN TRULY BE REDUCED AS PROPOSED BY
THE SOVIET UNION? THIS MAGNIFICENT SOVIET PLAN, TO USE A
CHINESE SAYING, IS "TO DRAW A PIE TO SATISFY HUNGER." IF THE
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES WERE MADE TO WAIT FOR SUCH ASSISTANCE,
WOULDN'T THEY BE LEFT HELPLESS LIKE "THE STRANDED FISH WHICH
IS PROMISED WATER TO BE FETCHED FROM A DISTANT SEA?"
CHINA'S VIEWS ON DISARMAMENT ARE KNOWN TO ALL. WE ARE
FOR DISARMAMENT. BUT IS MUT BE GENUINE AND NOT PHONEY DISAR-
MAMENT. WE ARE AGAINST PHONEY DISARMEMENT, AND STILL MORE
AGAINST THE SOVIET ATTEMPT TO USE A DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE AS
A VEIL TO COVER UP THE TRUTH OF ITS ARMS EXPANSION AND WAR
PREPARATIONS. THE TWO SUPERPOWERS ARE QUICKENING THEIR PACE
TOWARDS A NEW WORLD WAR. AT THIS JUNCTURE, A DISARMAMENT CON-
FERENCE IN WHATEVER FORM WILL ONLY CREATE ILLUSIONS OF PEACE,
SERVE TO DECEIVE AND LULL THEPEOPLE OF THE WORLD AND BIND
THE HANDS OF THE NUMEROUS SMALL AND MEDIUM COUNTRIES. THIS
IS WHAT WE ARE FIRMLY AGAINST.
AS REGARDS A WORLD DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE, CHINA KEEPS
FORD
TO HER POSITION SET FORTH LONG AGO, NAMELY, IT MUST HAVE A
CLEAR AIM AND THE NECESSARY PRE-CONDITIONS. THECLEARAIM IS
THE COMPLETE PROHIBITION AND THOROUGH DESTRUCTION OF NUCLEAR
GERALD
WEAPONS, AND ABSOLUTELY NOT THE SO-CALLED LIMITATION OF STRA-
TEGIC ARMS. THE NECESSARY PRE-CONDITIONS ARE: ALL NUCLEAR
END OF PAGE 11
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
COUNTRIES, AND PARTICULARLY THE TWO NUCLEAR SUPERPOWERS, THE
SOVIET UNION AND THE UNITED STATES, MUST FIRST OF ALL UNDERTAKE
TO UNEQUIVOCAL OBLIGATION THAT THEY WILL NOT BE THE FIRST TO
USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS AT ANY TIME AND IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, AND
IN PARTICULAR WILL NOT USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS AGSINST NON-NUCLEAR
COUNTRIES AND NUCLEAR-FREE ZONES, AND THAT THEY MUST WITHDRAW
FROM ABROAD ALL THEIR ARMED FORCES, INCLUDING NUCLEAR-MISSILE
FORCES, AND DISMANTLE ALL THEIR MILITARY BASES, INCLUDING
NUCLEAR BASES, ON THE TERRITORIES OF OTHER COUNTRIES. BUT NOW
THE SUPERPOWERS EVEN REFUSE TO UNDERTAKE THE MINIMUM OBLIGA-
TION OF NOT USING NUCLEAR WEAPONS AGAINST THE NON-NUCLEAR COUN-
TRIES. HOW CAN IT BE SAID THAT CONDITIONS ARE RIPE FOR HOLDING
A WORLD DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE?
HISTORICAL EXPERIENCE MERITS ATTENTION. THE MORE THE
IMPERIALISTS DIFFUSE A SMOKESCREEN OF DISARMAMENT, THE BIGGER
IS THE DANGER OF WAR. BEFORE WORLD WAR II, A LARGE-SCALE
INTERNATIONAL DISARMEMENT CONFERENCE LASTING NEARLY THREE
YEARS WAS HELD UNDER THE SPONSORSHIP OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS
AFTER NEARLY SEVEN YEARS OF PREPARATION, AND HUNDREDS OF PRO-
POSALS AND SUGGESTIONS WERE DISCUSSED. BUT THE RESULTS? ARMS
EXPANSION INSTEAD OF DISARMAMENT, AND WAR INSTEAD OF PEACE.
THE ONLY EFFECT OF THAT CONFERENCE WAS TO PUT MANY COUNTRIES
OFF GUARD AND AS A RESULT, THEY WERE CAUGHT UNPREPARED BY THE
OUTBREAK OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR AND SUFFERED A GREAT DEAL.
WE HOLD THAT THE UNITED NATIONS SHOULD NOT REPEAT THE
MISTAKE OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS.
NEVERTHELESS, AS WAS EXPECTED, THE SOVIET UNION TABLED
AT THIS SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY A PROPOSAL FOR THE
"COMPLETE AND GENERAL PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPON TESTS."
THIS IS OLD WARE IN NEW WRAPPINGS AND ANOTHER OF ITS TRICKS
FOR MAINTAINING NUCLEAR MONOPOLY. CHINA'S STAND ON THIS QUES-
TION IS CLEAR TO ALL AND WE WILL NOT REPEAT IT. AS REGARDS
THE SOVIET PROPOSAL FOR THE PROHIBITION OF THE MANUFACTURE OF
WHAT IT CALLS NEW TYPES OF WEAPONS EVEN MORE FORMIDABLE THAN
NUCLEAR WEAPONS, ITS AIM IS NONE OTHER THAN TO DIVERT PEOPLE'S
ATTENTION FROM THE IMMEDIATE ISSUES BY TALKING ABOUT REMOTE
THINGS. LET IT BE DISCUSSED BY THOSE WHO ARE PREPARED TO
MANUFACTURE SUCH WEAPONS. THERE IS NO NEED TO BRING IT UP
HERE TO SCARE PEOPLE.
V. THE QUESTION OF DEVELOPMENT
SINCE THE SIXTH SPECIAL SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,
THE THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES HAVE WAGED EFFECTIVE STRUGGLES AND
PUT FORWARD A SERIES OF REASONABLE PROPOSALS AND IDEAS FOR
TRANSFORMING THE OLD INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER BASED ON
EXPLOITATION. THE OIL-EXPORTING COUNTRIES HAVE BRAVELY STOOD
:
FORD
UP TO SUPERPOWER INTIMIDATION AND THREATS, AND KEPT A FIRM
HOLD ON THEIR OIL RESOURCES AND THEIR RIGHT TO FIX OIL PRICES.
MANY COUNTRIES HAVE ADOPTED MEASURES AGAINST TRANSNATIONAL
GERALD
LIBRARY
CORPORATIONS TO REGAIN THEIR SOVEREIGN RIGHTS IN VARYING DEGREES.
VARIOUS ASSOCIATIONS OF RAW MATERIAL-PRODUCING COUNTRIES HAVE
END OF PAGE 12
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
BEEN SET UP ONE AFTER ANOTHER. THE THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES HAVE
PUT FORWARD A NUMBER OF PROPOSALS, SUCH AS THE INTEGRATED
PROGRAMME FOR COMMODITIES AND THE INDEXATION OF PRICES, FOR
THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE PRESENT IRRATIONAL INTERNATIONAL
ECONOMIC ORDER. THE SITUATION OF THE STRUGGLE IN THE ECONOMIC
FIELD AGAINST COLONIALISM, IMPERIALISM AND HEGEMONISM IS
EXCELLENT.
THERE ARE TWO CONFLICTING POSITIONS ON THE QUESTION OF
DEVELOPMENT. THE POSITION TAKEN BY THE THIRD WORLD IS FOR
MAINTAINING INDEPENDENCE AND SELF-RELAINCE, TRANSFORMING THE
OLD ECONOMIC ORDER OF EXPLOITATION OF THE THIRD WORLD BY A
FEW BIG POWERS AND ESTABLISHING A NEW ECONOMIC ORDER ON THE
PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGNTY, EQUALITY AND MUTUAL BENEFIT. THE
OTHER POSITION, TAKEN BY THE SUPERPOWERS, STRESSES "INTERDEPEND-
ENCE" OR "INTERNATIONAL DIVISION OF LABOUR" BETWEEN THE
EXPLOITING AND THE EXPLOITED COUNTRIES IN AN ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE
THE OLD ECONOMIC ORDER. ARE THE INDUSTRIALLY DEVELOPED COUN-
TRIES AND THE RAW MATERIAL-PRODUCING COUNTRIES INTERDEPENDENT?
YES, THEY ARE. THIS INTERDEPENDENCE HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE EVER
SINCE THE EMERGENCE OF A SINGLE WORLD MARKET. THE POINT IS
WHAT KIND OF INTERDEPENDENCE. IT MAY BE SAID THAT THERE IS
AN INTERDEPENDENCE BETWEEN THE HORSE AND ITS RIDER. BUT, WE
ALL KNOW IT IS THE HORSE THAT TAKES THE BURDEN AND NOT THE
RIDER. AS FOR "INTERNATIONAL DIVISION OF LABOUR," IT IS IN
ESSENCE ONE AND THE SAME AS "INTERDEPENDENCE." WITH THE EMERGENCE
OF COLONIALISM AND IMPERIALISM, A NEW INTERNATIONAL DIVISION
OF LABOUR SPRANG UP IN THE WORLD THAT CONVERTED ONE PART
OF THE GLOBE INTO A CHIEFLY AGRICULTURAL FIELD OF PRODUCTION
SERVING THE OTHER PART WHICH WAS A CHIEFLY INDUSTRIAL FIELD.
BUT TO CALL SUCH COSMOPOLITAN EXPLOITATION INTERNATIONALISM
IS AN IDEA THAT COULD ONLY BE ENGENDERED IN THE BRAINS OF THE
SOCIAL-IMPERIALISTS. WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS EXPLOITATION IN
THE EXISTING INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS AND WHETHER OR
NOT AN END SHOULD BE PUT TO SUCH EXPLOITATION -- THIS IS A REAL
PROBLEM OF GREAT IMPORTANCE TODAY.
TOWARDS THE DEMAND OF THE THIRD WORLD FOR TRANSFORMING
THE OLD INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER, TWO DIFFERING ATTITUDES
ARE ADOPTED BY DIFFERENT INDUSTRIALLY DEVELOPED COUNTRIES.
ONE IS DIALOGUE, AND THE OTHER CONFRONTATION. SINCE THE USE
OF OIL AS A WEAPON BY THE OIL-EXPORTING COUNTRIES, ONE SUPER-
POWER HAS KEPT HURLING ABUSES AND WAVING THE BIG STICK AT THEM
AND EVEN THREATENED THEM WITH ARMED INTERVENTION IN AN ATTEMPT
TO COERCE THEM INTO SUBMISSION. THE OTHER SUPERPOWER HAS
CHIMED IN, SAYING THAT OIL PRICES SHOULD NOT BE RAISED UNILAT-
ERALLY AND ASSERTING THREATENINGLY THAT THE AGGRAVATION OF THE
FORD
OIL PROBLEM MAY CAUSE A NEW FLARE-UP OF INTERNATIONAL TENSIONS.
BOTH TAKE AN OUT-AND-OUT IMPERIALIST ATTITUDE. WE ARE FIRMLY
AGAINST THIS ATTITUDE. FACTS SHOW THAT THIS ATTITUDE,
GERALD
LIBRARY
FAR FROM SUBDUING THE OIL-EXPORTING COUNTRIES, ONLY STIMU-
LATED THEM TO CLOSER UNITY AND HARDENED THEIR FIGHTING WILL.
END OF PAGE 13
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
WE ARE IN FAVOUR OF DIALOGUE. IN THE PAST YEAR AND MORE, MANY
SECOND WORLD COUNTRIES HAVE FREQUENTLY TRIED DIALOGUE WITH A
NUMBER OF THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES, AND SOME OF TTHESE ATTEMPTS
HAVE YIELDED POSITIVE RESULTS. TIES BETWEEN THE SECOND WORLD
AND THE THIRD WORLD HAVE BEEN STRENGTHENED. THIS IS A GOOD
PHENOMENON IN THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LIFE OF TODAY.
IN THE FACE OF THE WORSENING CAPITALIST ECONOMIC CRISIS
AND THE SHIFTING OF CRISES BY INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES, THE
THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES HAVE ADVANCED SUCH PROPOSALS AS THE
INTEGRATED PROGRAMME FOR COMMODITIES, THE INDEXATION OF PRICES
AND THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTI-
TUTIONS IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THEIR TRADE TERMS AND DEVELOP
THEIR NATIONAL ECONOMIES. THESE ARE ENTIRELY JUSTIFIABLE AND
ARE MINIMUM DEMANDS. BUT THEY HAVE MET WITH OPPOSITION FROM
A FEW MAJOR INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES. FOR THEY CONSTITUTE A
VIOLATION OF THE SO-CALLED FREE MARKET SYSTEM, WHICH IS ALLE-
GEDLY SACRED AND INVIOLABLE. INSTEAD, THOSE INDUSTRIALIZED
COUNTRIES HAVE PUT FORWARD A SERIES OF CONCRETE PROPOSALS
ALLEGEDLY DESIGNED TO "PROMOTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT." AS A
MATTER OF FACT, THE SO-CALLED FREE MARKET OF TODAY HAS NEVER
BEEN FREE EVER SINCE THE EMERGENCE OF MONOPOLY CAPITAL.
THIS MARKET IS FREE ONLY FOR MONOPOLY CAPITAL AND THE INDUSTRIAL
POWERS AND NOT FOR THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. IN THE SIXTIES,
FOR EXAMPLE, THE PRICES OF OIL AND MANY OTHER RAW MATERIALS
WERE KEPT SO LOW. WAS THAT DETERMINED BY SUPPLY AND DEMAND?
NO, IT WAS DETERMINED ARBITRARILY, OR "FREELY", IF YOU LIKE,
BY BIG MONOPOLY CAPITAL. TO TRANSFORM THE OLD INTERNATIONAL
ECONOMIC ORDER, IT IS IMPERATIVE TO TOUCH THIS FREE MARKET
SYSTEM OF GAINING PROFITS AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS. OTHERWISE,
NO MATTER HOW MANY CONCRETE PROPOSALS THE SUPERPOWERS MAY
SUBMIT OR HOW MUCH MONEY THEY MAY PROMISE, THESE IN ESSENCE
ARE NOTHING BUT A KIND OF ALMS AND RELIEF WHICH CAN AT BEST
TEMPORARILY MITIGATE A LITTLE THE DIFFICULTIES OF THE DEVELOP-
ING COUNTRIES BUT WILL NOT HELP THEM SHAKE OFF EXPLOITATION
AND CONTROL. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THEIR POVERTY WILL STILL BE
THERE. THE GAP BETWEEN THE POOR AND RICH COUNTRIES WILL KEEP
WIDENING.
THE OIL WEAPON HAS OPENED UP NEW VISTAS FOR THE ANTI-
COLONIALIST, ANTI-IMPERIALIST AND ANTI-HEGEMONIC STRUGGLE IN
THE ECONOMIC FIELD. THE KEY TO THE VICTORIES OF THE OIL
STRUGGLE LIES IN UPHOLDING UNITY AND DARING TO TOUCH WHAT THE
INDUSTRIAL POWERS REGARD AS SACRED AND INVIOLABLE. ALL RAW
MATERIAL-PRODUCING COUNTRIES SHOULD GET ORGANIZED AND FIGHT
FORD
IN DEFENCE OF THEIR PROPER INTERESTS. SOME PEOPLE ACCUSE
OPEC OF BEING A MONOPOLY ORGANIZATION, A CARTEL. WHY DON'T
THEY STOP AND THINK THAT CARTELS, TRUSTS AND TRANSNATIONAL
GERALD
LIBRARY
CORPORATIONS WERE INVENTIONS OF THE INDISTRIAL POWERS AND
THAT TO DATE THEY STILL WEIGHT DOWN HEAVILY ON THE
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. ARE WE TO TOLERATE THE INJUSTICE
OF THE MAGISTRATES BEING ALLOWED TO BURN DOWN HOUSES WHILE
END OF PAGE 14
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
THE COMMON PEOPLE ARE FORBIDDEN TO USE FIRE EVEN TO LIGHT
LAMPS? ALL THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES SHOULD UNITE MORE
CLOSELY. IT IS TRUE THAT AMONG THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
SOME ARE IN THE GREATEST NEED. OTHER COUNTRIES SHOULD GIVE
THEM MORE HELP, AND THEY HAVE ALREADY BEGUN TO DO SO.
THE NEEDIEST AND OTHER DEVELOPING COUNTRIES SHARE COMMON
EXPERIENCES AND FACE COMMON TASKS. TO CALL THE NEEDIEST
COUNTRIES THE "FOURTH WORLD" IS GROUNDLESS OR ILL-
INTENTIONED. THERE ARE NO SAVIOURS IN THE WORLD. TO
DEVELOP THAT NATIONAL ECONOMY, A COUNTRY MUST PERSIST IN
INDEPENDENCE AND SELF-RELIANCE. POLITICAL INDEPENDENCE
IS NOT WON EASILY, SO IT IS ESSENTIAL TO GIVE PLAY TO STATE
SOVEREIGNTY TO ELIMINATE GRADUALLY BUT FIRMLY THE FORCES OF
IMPERIALISM AND ALL FORCES OF COLONIALISM AND NEO-
COLONIALISM. THE OLD INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER WAS
EVOLVED OVER CENTURIES OF COLONIALIST AND IMPERIALIST
PLUNDER AND EXPLOITATION. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO THOROUGHLY
CHANGE IT AT ONE STROKE. THE SEVENTH SPECIAL SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IS A CONTINUATION OF THE STRUGGLE
OF THE SIXTH SPECIAL SESSION. THE STRUGGLE AGAINST EXPLOITATION
WILL BE A LONG ONE. UNITED AS ONE AND PERSISTING IN OUR
EFFORTS, WE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES WILL SURELY ATTAIN OUR GOAL.
MR. PRESIDENT,
BEFORE CONCLUDING MY SPEECH, I WOULD LIKE TO STATE BRIEFLY
OUR OPINIONS ON THE REVIEW OF THE UN.N. CHARTER. WE
ARE IN FAVOUR OF REVIEWING THE CHARTER AND MAKING THE NECESSARY
AMENDMENTS. NOTHING IN THE WORLD IS IMMUTABLE. THE SITUATION
WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED NATIONS HAS CHANGED, AND IT IS
ONLY NATURAL THAT THE CHARTER SHOULD BE AMENDED ACCORDINGLY
SO AS TO SUIT THE CHANGED SITUATION. THIS IS COMMON SENSE.
BASING THEMSELVES ON THE PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES OF THE
CHARTER, MANY COUNTRIES HAVE PUT FORWARD VIEWS IN PRINCIPLE
ON THE REVISION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE CHARTER, SUCH
AS EXPANDING THE POWER OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, RESTRICTING
THE POWER OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL, CHANGING THE COMPOSITION
OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL, LIMITING OR ABOLISHING THE VETO
RIGHT OF THE STATES PERMANENT MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY
COUNCIL. WE THINK THAT THESEVIEWS DESERVE SERIOUS
CONSIDERATION. SINCE THE U.N. CHARTER WAS DRAWN UP BY MAN,
WHY CAN'T IT BE REVISED BY MAN? BUT THE SUPERPOWERS ARE
GREATLY UPSET BY THE CHANGED SITUATION WITHIN THE UNITED
NATIONS. ONE SUPER-POWER DESCRIBES THE DEMOCRATIC VOTING
IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AS A "TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY." THE OTHER
GOES FURTHER; AT THE MERE MENTION OF THE PHASE "REVIEW OF THE
U.N. CHARTER," IT FLIES INTO A RAGE AND BREAKS INTO ABUSE,
FORD & LIBRARY 07VH39
CALLING PEOPLE IN FAVOUR OF REVIEWING THE CHARTER "REACTIONARY
FORCES." IT MORTALLY FEARS THAT IT MIGHT BE DEPRIVED OF ITS
PRIVILEGE TO ABUSE THE VETO POWER. WE WOULD ADVISE THIS
"NATURAL ALLOY OF THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES" TO CALM
DOWN A BIT AND NOT GET SO EXASPERATED. IT YOU ARE SURE THAT YOU
END OF PAGE 15
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
HAVE THE TRUTH, WHY ARE YOU SO AFRAID OF DISSENTING VIEWS?
A REVIEW OF THE U.N. CHARTER IS THE GENERAL TREND AND POPULAR
DEMAND. WE BELIEVE THAT A RATIONAL SOLUTION ACCEPTABLE
TO ALL CAN BE FOUND SO LONG AS THE NATIONS, BIG AND SMALL,
CARRY ON PATIENT CONSULTATIONS AND REPEATED DISCUSSIONS
ON THE BASIS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY FOR ALL.
IF ANYONE STILL RESORTS TO DELIBERATE OBSTRUCTIONS, THAT
CAN ONLY HELP PEOPLE SEE MORE CLEARLY WHO ARE CHAMPIONS OF
THE SPECIAL PRIVILEGES OF THE MINORITY. THEREFORE, WE
SUBMIT THAT THE WORK OF THE REVIEW OF THE CHARTER
SHOULD BE CONTINUED.
THANK YOU, MR. PRESIDENT.
KISSINGER
7513
5532
UNCLAS
FORD i GERALD LIBRARY
NNNN
3a
7519209
6525
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
September 29, 1975
SECRET/NODIS
MEMORANDUM FOR: THE PRESIDENT
From:
Henry A. Kissinger HK
Subject:
PRC Foreign Minister Ch'iao Kuan-hua's
UNGA Speech
Foreign Minister Ch'iao Kuan-hua's September 26
speech to the United Nations General Assembly took a
tough line against the US. Although as usual the
Soviets were the targets for some of his more biting
criticism, this time we were more equally attacked
than in the past. He pulled no punches when attacking
the US generally and specifically, such as Korea and
the Middle East. If taken at face value, the speech
would suggest more strongly than most PRC statements
that the US and the PRC have few if any common
interests.
In addition to what he said on particular issues,
some expected, some not, what is perturbing is the
cumulative effect of his criticism of the US.
--- The two superpowers are blamed for most of
the world's problems; because of their contention,
"they are bound to go to war against each other some
day. " Both superpowers "are after world domination."
However, he did say that "the danger of war comes
mainly from the wildly ambitious social imperialism."
-- "The more evils they (the superpowers) do, the
more thoroughly they will reveal their true features
"
-- The US "has not lagged behind" the Soviets
in stimulating civil war in Angola. However, this is
all he says about us and the Soviets are attacked at
length.
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12958, SEC. 3.5
State leirew
&
FORD
SECRET/NODIS
STATE DEPT, GUIDELINES' 9/27/02
XGDS-3
BY
HR NARA, DATE 2/3/03
GERALD
LIBRARY
SECRET/NODIS
-2-
-- "US interference in Korea is the root cause
of constant tensions in Korea." Recent US proposals
on the Korea question are designed to legalize the
presence of US troops in South Korea and to perpetuate
the division of Korea. The US Draft Resolution is
completely unacceptable. While not being so explicit
in rejecting our conference proposal, he is highly
negative on that as well. The call for withdrawal of
US forces is more categorical than in the past.
-- In the Middle East, the US proposes a "step-
by-step solution" and the Soviets a "comprehensive
solution." Both try to "masquerade as a friend of
the Arab and Palestinian people." The US has no
intention of bringing about a thorough settlement of
the Middle East question (the Soviet Union is even
less inclined.) Like the Soviet Union, the US
prefers a "no war, no peace" situation. There are
specific cracks against our negotiating efforts: the
"struggle of the people" not "agreements on paper"
will determine the future. A "superpower is taking
advantage of the present situation to SOW discord and
attempt to undermine Arab unity."
-- Regarding the world economic order, the US
stresses "interdependence" in order to preserve the
old order. "Since the use of oil as a weapon by the
oil-exporting countries, one superpower has kept
hurling abuses and waving the big stick at them and
even threatened them with armed intervention
"
Ch'iao closely ties China to the Third World struggle.
Even when abbreviated like this it is a for-
midable litany, beyond the "empty cannons" we have
been exposed to in the past.
We can only speculate about why the Chinese
leaders decided to take such a hard line against the
US. Some possibilities:
-- They may assume, on the basis of past experience,
that we will roll with the punch and not let such
speeches affect our basic relationship.
SECRET/NODIS
FORD is LIBRARY
SECRET/NODIS
-3-
-- Peking probably judges (from debates in this
country, slippage on SALT and Brezhnev visit, etc.)
that we are having troubles with Moscow and that
this reduces our leverage on the Chinese.
-- In addition, they calculate generally that we
are on the strategic defensive and are less able to
conduct a coherent and effective foreign policy.
-- For reasons related to PRC leadership tensions
and policy debates, even those Chinese leaders who
support the rapprochement with the US feel it is
necessary to protect their flanks.
-- They have probably concluded that the
President's trip is unlikely to result in a break-
through on the Taiwan issue and are therefore not
particularly worried about the effect of a speech
like this on our attitude on that issue.
-- In any event, the speech reflects one aspect
of PRC strategy in dealing with US: the PRC is not
going to adjust its views to accommodate the US, so
the US must do the accommodating.
None of these explanations is fully satisfactory
in itself. The PRC motivation is probably an amalgam
of all of them.
SECRET/NODIS
FORD
3b
DOC
RECD
oc NBR
NSC CORRESPONDENCE PROFILE
MO
DA
MO
DA
HR
9
29
7506525
Solomon INITIAL ACTION o
92419
REFERENCE:
CIRCLE AS APPROPRIATE
TO: PRES
x
X
FROM: KISSINGER, H
S/S
UNCLAS LOG IN/OUT
SOURCE/CLASS/DESCRIPTION
KISSINGER
COLBY, W
OTHER
LOU
NO FORN
NODIS
SCOWCROFT
R
SCHLESINGER, J
C
EYES ONLY EXDIS
DAVIS
ST EX SEC
S
CODEWORD
TS
SENSITIVE
SUBJECT: Summary of speech by PRC fomin Ch'cao
Kuan-hua at UNGA on Sept 26 re attacks
on INTERNAL Us ROUTING & AND Vssr DISTRIBUTION ACTION form INFO. REC Johny ACTION REQUIRED
CY
ADVANCE CYS TO HAK COWCROFT
FOR
MEMO FOR HAK
(
)
STAFF SECRETARY
MEMO FOR PRES
(
x
)
FAR EAST
Solomon
x
REPLY FOR
(
)
APPROPRIATE ACTION
(
)
DISTRIBUTION/INITIAL ACTION ASGMT
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
MID EAST / NO. AFRICA / so. ASIA
MEMO
TO
(
)
RECOMMENDATIONS
(
)
EUROPE / CANADA
JOINT MEMO
-
LATIN AMERICA
)
REFER TO
FOR:
(
)
UNITED NATIONS
ECONOMIC
ANY ACTION NECESSARY?
(
-
SCIENTIFIC
CONCURRENCE.
)
PROGRAM ANALYSIS
DUE DATE:
NSC PLANNING
10/10
COMMENTS: (INCLUDING SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS)
CONGRESSIONAL
OCEANS POLICY
INTELLIGENCE
DATE
FROM
TO
S
SUBSEQUENT ACTION REQUIRED (OR TAKEN):
CY TO
10/8
Puts
N3C/S
ODE PER SoLomoN
SUBSEQUENT ROUTING/ACTIONS
FORD is 077839 LIBRARY
DISPATCH
CY RQMTS: SEE ABOVE PLUS:
MICROFILM & FILE RQMTS:
NSC/S DISP INSTR
NOTIFY
& DATE
BY
M/F'D
OCT 10 BY 13/5
SPECIAL DISPOSITION:
CRT ID:
SA
SF
CRO REF W/
OPEN MAK
HP
NS
SUSPENSE CY ATTACHED:
x
FOLDER:
CLOSE MJT
WH
EP
PA
DY
( NSC 75-22
575-600
)