Letter from William Loeb, Jr. to E. A. Hitchcock

This item is a letter regarding a statement made by the Osage Indian Agent, Frank Frantz about the Osage Oil royalty. Also included is a letter regarding the lease of land with the Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company.

Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 7
Page 5. adjacent oil fields and feel that they are making good bargains or they would not take these leases. Now, the question is, what percentage of royalty is the parent company justly entitled to in addition to the large cash bonuses received, acting purely in the capacity of agent, and what percentage is the tribe entitled to as the owner of the land? Royalties paid in other developed fields vary to such an extent, ranging from 1/10 to 1/6 and even 1/4 to 1/2 in exceptional cases, that it is hard to arrive at the average royalty paid, except by deductions based upon reliable information obtained from practical oil men. In no instance have I been able to learn of a lower royalty than 1/10 being paid, and in addition to the royalty exacted, in every instance, a cash bonus is paid to the owner of the land often equal to, and in many cases far in excess of the actual surface value of the land. In talking over the matter of royalty with a large number of the most extensive oil operators in the country, I find that they are practically agreed that the average royalty paid to the land owners over the entire country is one-eighth, in addition to the cash bonuses exacted. It is claimed by the parent company that the cost of product- ion is greater here than in any of the older oil fields. This is un- true, in that it is misleading. It is true that the cost of develop- ment is some greater than in many of the older fields, but the production is so much greater that it more than offsets any difference in the cost of development. It is also claimed by the parent company in support of their argument that the grade of oil produced in this field is much