Memorandum of Conversation with Secretary of State Dean Acheson, Ambassador of Great Britain Sir Oliver Franks, and George Perkins
Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
183391211
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2S/S
s
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
ARCHIVES 'NATIONAL RECORDS AND 671
322
SERVICE*
DECLASSIFIED
E. O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and S(D) or (E)
Memorandum of Conversation
Dept. of State letter, Aug. 9, 1973
By NLT- HC , NARS Date 4.29.66
DATE: December 14, 1949
SUBJECT:
Proposed Bilaterals Under MAP
Confidential
PARTICIPANTS:
Sir Oliver Franks, The British Ambassador
Mr. Dean Acheson, The Secretary of State
Mr. George W. Perkins, Assistant Secretary of State
for European Affairs
COPIES TO:
s, U, G, S/MDA, EUR, BNA, American Embassy, London.
-1493
Sir Oliver stated that the British Cabinet was deeply
concerned about the proposed bilaterals in connection with
the Military Assistance Program. He explained that since
the war the United Kingdom had made substantial contributions
to the defense of other European countries, the total running
to approximately 1400 million, nore than half of which was in
the form of gifts, loans, or sales at greatly reduced prices.
In addition, they were proposing to continue such expenditures
at the rate of about 140 million a year for the next two years.
They felt that they had done and were doing all that they
could do in assisting other countries. He stated that the
British Government had originally misunderstood the amount of
assistance which would be available to the United Kingdom
under the Military Assistance Program and that this was now
reduced to B-29 airplanes (which some part of the British air
force is not too keen to have)* and about $25 million worth of
machine tools. This was far less than they had expected and
did not make a substantial contribution to their preparedness
program.
He stated that there were two difficulties presented in
the bilaterals which he wished to enumerate: (1) the provision
in Article I, paragraph 4, of the proposed bilateral covering
the transfer
*Material in parentheses is additional comment
not contained in conversation.
confidential
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to