Memorandum of Conversation with Secretary of State Dean Acheson, the Minister of External Affairs and Commonwealth Relations of Pakistan, the Secretary General of the Government of Pakistan, and T. Eliot Weil
Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
183391307
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2The Secretary
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
ma'o files
CONF IDENTIAL
680
Memorandum of Conversation
103
DATE: January 6, 1950
8
SUBJECT:
The Kashmir Controversy
PARTICIPANTS:
The Secretary
Sir Mohammed Zafrullah Khan, Pakistan Minister of External
Affairs and Commonwealth Relations
Mr. Mohammed Ali, Secretary General, Government of Pakistan
Mr. T. Eliot Weil, SOA
COPIES TO:
NEA
UNA
USUN
DRN
CIA
AMEMBASSIES - Karachi, New Delhi, Kabul, London.
SOA
1-1493
Sir Zafrullah, accompanied by Mr. Mohammed Ali, called on me at 2:30 p.m.
Sir Zafrullah said the Kashmir question had again become "stuck" at the UN;
that General McNaughton had made an effort to settle the matter, and that while
Pakistan had in effect accepted his proposals, the Indians had offered amendments
which were to all intents and purposes a rejection of these proposals. Sir Zafrullah
said he questioned whether General McNaughton would be willing to continue efforts
at mediation unless the new Security Council gave him a speci: fic directive.
Sir Zafrullah said he had come, "almost desperately", to seek advice and
guidance. He said the people of Pakistan were becoming increasingly impatient over
failure to settle the Kashmir controversy and he did not know how much longer they
would control this impatience.
I asked Sir Zafrullah for his views as to how a solution might be found. Sir
Zafrullah replied that the framework already existed; that the resolutions of
August 13, 1948, and January 5, 1949, had been accepted by both Governments, and
that it was now merely a question of implementing these; but that the Indien Govern-
ment was unwilling to accept conditions which would allow the Plebiscite Administrator
to take over. He said continued delay in settling the controversy was in some ways
embarrassing to both countries, but that on the whole it was probably advantageous
to India. He said it would be impossible to reach an equitable settlement merely
by
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
State Dept. Quideline June 12, 1979
RECORSS
p.p.cous von.
SERVICES
By NLT- NC
NATS, Date 11-15-12
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to