Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
193225514
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2+
TION
September 3, 1952
264
- <<
NSC Meeting
Council Action on NSC 135/1
At the Council meeting this afternoon, the President
directed the approval of the recommendations in NSC, (135/1
and the creation of an ad hoc group composed of State,
Defense and DMS to carry out the studies recommended
in Paragraph 9 (a) of the paper. The paper itself was
referred back to the Senior Staff for certain editorial
changes and for an addition referred to below.
I left with Mr. Lovett and Mr. Lay copies of the proposed
directive which Mr. Lay will go over and issue in due course
if upon study Mr. Lovett through Mr. Noyes finds no objection
to the wording. I informed Mr. Lay that Mr. Harriman agreed.
In regard to substance, the NSRB view put forward by
Mr. Gorrie and answered by Mr. Lovett resulted in no action.
Mr. Gorrie became satisfied that everything was being done
which could reasonably be expected along the lines of his
request. Some of the matters to which Defense will direct
the attention of the Senior Staff, as mentioned by Mr. Lovett,
were as follows:
Paragraph 1 - Reference to the fundamental purpose, as
stated in 68, and the three specifications (a), (b) and (c)
were criticized because they ought to indicate that a primary
objective of U.S. policy was the maintenance of peace.
The next passage mentioned was the last paragraph of 9(b).
Mr. Lovett pointed out that the object of the draftsman was
commendable but the statement as written seemed somewhat
absurd. The last paragraph mentioned by Mr. Lovett was
Paragraph 15, which to him carried the connotation that we
regretted the inability to fix the date for the opening of the
preventive war. Defense may have other suggestions also.
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
State Dept. Guideline, June 12, 1979
By NLT- HC
PROJECT NLT NARS, 79-15 Date 6.6.60
-
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to