Memorandum of Conversation with Secretary of State Dean Acheson and Secretary of Agriculture Charles Brannan
Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
193226187
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3CONFIDENTIA
December 29, 1952
384
404
s/s
Following the Cabinet meeting on December 23, the Secretary
discussed with Secretary of Agriculture Brannan the proposed
new dairy import restrictions which were the subject of a
memorandum dated December 19 to the Secretary from
Mr. Linder. The substance of the conversation was that
Secretary Brannan was not inclined to go along with our
recommendation that Agriculture delay indefinitely its action
in announcing additional dairy import restrictions under
Section 104 of the Defense Production Act. However, Secre-
tary Brannan did agree to put off the proposed action until
after Christmas. He would see what effect the holiday pur-
chasing had on the domestic butter market before taking action.
Secretary Brannan explained that the law required support
of milk, but that in order to carry it out, it is necessary for the
Agriculture Department to purchase products into which milk
goes, such as butter, cheese, dried milk, etc. He stated that,
for example, butter and dried milk may both be used in the
manufacture of icecream in varying proportions, depending
upon the formula of a particular manufacturer. Therefore, the
importation of one item in the dairyfield has an effect similar
to the importation of another item in the same group.
The Secretary suggested that it might be desirable to let
the succeeding Administration announce the restrictions and
be prepared to face the criticism which may result as the im-
pact of the restrictions reaches into various economic fields.
Secretary Brannan said, in his view, that delaying the action
would produce the opposite effect. He said that Section 104 might
become mandatory and a permanent part of the import and
tariff picture. He thought that the repercussions which would
occur domestically and the retaliations which might be put into
effect by other countries almost immediately might militate
for the greatest good in the long run since it would show all
segments of agriculture that in toto they would suffer from
DECLASSIFIED
supporting
E. O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and S(D) or (E)
Dept. of State letter, 10.26.26
NLT- HV. NARS Date 11-30-76
COHIDDENTIAL
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to