Ask the Scholar

Page 3 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 3

OCR

THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 18 May 1953 $ TRUMAN ARCHIVESAND U.S. SERVICE" LIBRARY Dear Dean: GOVERNMENT Thank you for your note of May 11th and for the copy of your letter to Mac. Mac has now sent me a copy of his answer to you. I have, not con- flicting, but other, comments to make. Here they are: First: to your alternatives between the chronological and systematic approach on one hand and the episodic and less formal on the other, you were right in thinking that my preferences would be for the latter; but I do not think episodic or chronological is the right characterization of what I had in mind, or what would most appeal to you. I think the word should be "thematic." I believe that this will avoid the very real danger of giving a partial and undocumented account of the history that you have lived and made. I am sure that the danger is great. I think it should also help to give structure and order to your recollections. Thus, it seems to me, not, perhaps, as a good example, but as a possibility, you might wish to talk of incidents which threw light on the relationship between the military departments on the one hand and the other agencies, particularly the Department of State, on the other. No such talk could possibly be exhaustive; but it can give a depth and vividness and a sense of reality to the subject because you have lived with it as few others have. Analogous examples come easily to my mind, but surely as easily and far more relevantly to yours. This brings me perhaps to my second point: I tried when I saw you at Sandy Spring not to make this undertaking appear too formidable; but it would be futile and perhaps a little wicked of me to suggest that it can be done without some reflection and some effort on your part. I have tried to find a form in which that effort would not be complicated by preoccupations of security, of discretion and of expediency; but the effort of formulation and understanding is, I am afraid, an integral part of any attempt to communicate even to an intimate and a qualified audience. I am sure that many of those of whom we spoke as possible auditors will be eager and often qualified to help you; but they can only help. The third point perhaps is this: in thinking over our talk it seemed to me that the number of people in the group that I first suggested--ten or twelve- may be a little too small--even the list we wrote down suggests that. If we agree that we need not reach all others and cannot reach all others who are con- cerned with the understanding of public affairs, or teach about them or help explain them, we ought to do a reasonably good job within the limits that we do have. I have thus found myself thinking of a group of fifteen or twenty people; that image may be helpful to you in finding your own way. There is still another point. I suppose because it began that way during our talk the time at the farm you will have been asking yourself whether this Mr. Dean Acheson -2- 18 May 1953 undertaking is primarily for your own sake, or for the sake of those who will meet with you. Unless it is for the sake of those who will meet with you, it cannot in any real sense be helpful to you. I am convinced that it would be, and that it would make a profound change in the way in which those who came to talk with you and to listen think about the realities of public affairs and international relations. Because I am sure of this, I am confi- dent that for you, too, it will be a rewarding, even if not effortless, undertaking. As one final point: I have myself no clear preference as to whether there should be a recording or a written record prepared by members of the group. If you would have no anxieties about the existence of a record, if its existence were in no way to inhibit you in freedom and candor, then it would surely be good. But like all the other judgments, this must be one which only you can make. It does seem to me that Mac's suggestion of a talk with a few of your friends could be a helpful way of seeing whether these notions have substance and value, or whether they will be dissipated by criticism. My own confidence can surely be no substitute for yours, although it will, I hope, keep you from too easily abandoning the undertaking. My love to Alice, and my love to you, Robert MAREY U.S. ARCHIVES 5. SERVICE" RECORDS NATIONAL TRUMAH MENT AND LIBRARY GOVERN Robert Oppenheimer Mr. Dean Acheson 2805 P Street, N. W. Washington, D. C.

Page data

Page
3
Source index
0
Type
document
Media ID
022578bf76a7d6f0
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75848028
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75848028",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75848028",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letter from J. Robert Oppenheimer to Dean Acheson",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75848028",
    "collections": [
        "Dean Acheson Papers",
        "Princeton Seminars Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722146-11-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722146-11-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722146-11-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75848028",
    "label": "Letter from J. Robert Oppenheimer to Dean Acheson",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75848028"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75848028",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75848028",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letter from J. Robert Oppenheimer to Dean Acheson",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75848028",
    "collections": [
        "Dean Acheson Papers",
        "Princeton Seminars Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722146-11-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722146-11-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722146-11-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75848028",
    "naId": 75848028,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 18,
            "logicalDate": "1953-05-18",
            "month": 5,
            "year": 1953
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 3,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722146-11.pdf",
    "mediaId": "022578bf76a7d6f0",
    "ocrText": "THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY\nPRINCETON, NEW JERSEY\nOFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR\n18 May 1953\n$\nTRUMAN\nARCHIVESAND\nU.S.\nSERVICE\"\nLIBRARY\nDear Dean:\nGOVERNMENT\nThank you for your note of May 11th and for the copy of your letter\nto Mac. Mac has now sent me a copy of his answer to you. I have, not con-\nflicting, but other, comments to make. Here they are:\nFirst: to your alternatives between the chronological and systematic\napproach on one hand and the episodic and less formal on the other, you were\nright in thinking that my preferences would be for the latter; but I do not\nthink episodic or chronological is the right characterization of what I had\nin mind, or what would most appeal to you. I think the word should be \"thematic.\"\nI believe that this will avoid the very real danger of giving a partial and\nundocumented account of the history that you have lived and made. I am sure\nthat the danger is great. I think it should also help to give structure and\norder to your recollections. Thus, it seems to me, not, perhaps, as a good\nexample, but as a possibility, you might wish to talk of incidents which threw\nlight on the relationship between the military departments on the one hand and\nthe other agencies, particularly the Department of State, on the other. No\nsuch talk could possibly be exhaustive; but it can give a depth and vividness\nand a sense of reality to the subject because you have lived with it as few\nothers have. Analogous examples come easily to my mind, but surely as easily\nand far more relevantly to yours.\nThis brings me perhaps to my second point: I tried when I saw you at Sandy\nSpring not to make this undertaking appear too formidable; but it would be futile\nand perhaps a little wicked of me to suggest that it can be done without some\nreflection and some effort on your part. I have tried to find a form in which\nthat effort would not be complicated by preoccupations of security, of discretion\nand of expediency; but the effort of formulation and understanding is, I am\nafraid, an integral part of any attempt to communicate even to an intimate and\na qualified audience. I am sure that many of those of whom we spoke as possible\nauditors will be eager and often qualified to help you; but they can only help.\nThe third point perhaps is this: in thinking over our talk it seemed to\nme that the number of people in the group that I first suggested--ten or twelve-\nmay be a little too small--even the list we wrote down suggests that. If we\nagree that we need not reach all others and cannot reach all others who are con-\ncerned with the understanding of public affairs, or teach about them or help\nexplain them, we ought to do a reasonably good job within the limits that we do\nhave. I have thus found myself thinking of a group of fifteen or twenty people;\nthat image may be helpful to you in finding your own way.\nThere is still another point. I suppose because it began that way during\nour talk the time at the farm you will have been asking yourself whether this\nMr. Dean Acheson\n-2-\n18 May 1953\nundertaking is primarily for your own sake, or for the sake of those who\nwill meet with you. Unless it is for the sake of those who will meet with\nyou, it cannot in any real sense be helpful to you. I am convinced that it\nwould be, and that it would make a profound change in the way in which those\nwho came to talk with you and to listen think about the realities of public\naffairs and international relations. Because I am sure of this, I am confi-\ndent that for you, too, it will be a rewarding, even if not effortless,\nundertaking.\nAs one final point: I have myself no clear preference as to whether\nthere should be a recording or a written record prepared by members of the\ngroup. If you would have no anxieties about the existence of a record, if its\nexistence were in no way to inhibit you in freedom and candor, then it would\nsurely be good. But like all the other judgments, this must be one which only\nyou can make.\nIt does seem to me that Mac's suggestion of a talk with a few of your\nfriends could be a helpful way of seeing whether these notions have substance and\nvalue, or whether they will be dissipated by criticism. My own confidence can\nsurely be no substitute for yours, although it will, I hope, keep you from too\neasily abandoning the undertaking.\nMy love to Alice, and my love to you,\nRobert\nMAREY U.S. ARCHIVES 5. SERVICE\" RECORDS NATIONAL TRUMAH MENT AND LIBRARY\nGOVERN\nRobert Oppenheimer\nMr. Dean Acheson\n2805 P Street, N. W.\nWashington, D. C."
}