Ask the Scholar
Page 4 of 15
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
2/13/54, Reel 5, Track 1, Pa
4
wit thPannikhar, in which he said that if our air force were used in China
that Russian air force would intervene. I think he went beyond that, even.
DR. JESSUP:
In just thumbing through George Kennan's notes hyere, there seems to be a
might have
good deal about his continuous study of what the Fussians/had in mind, question
whe ther it would be useful to have negotiations -
DR. OPPENHEIMER: He was involved in this.
DR. JESSUP:
with them. That was one of the things Webb asked him to consider and he
apparently discussed it with you. His narrative is very much broken here,
He was away from July to December, and then was down just for a few days.
DR. OPPENHEIMER: It was December, I think, when he went to Washington to discuss this
question.
DR. JESSUP:
That's right. That was the time he wrote that memorandum, that was when he
talked withWEbb and Webb asked him specifically to consider whether it would
be useful to have a direct approach to the Russians with a view to bringing
a A
to
about a cease-fire in Korea. Then that was when he wrote the memorandum that
U.S. GOM
you read as to our general attitude and there was an analysis of an editorial
in PRAVDA which had been broadcast in English to the United States sixteen
times in 24 hours, which by its language seemed quite possibly to have been
written by Stalin himself. George summarizes the gist of that as in effect
saying "You had your chance to settle this business at a reasonable point;
you did not do it. What possible motive could you have had for going further
unless it was the thought of making war on communist China?" And then
it
ends, there is a note here "Passage not completed". It goes on with some
technical discussion about beachhead and talk with Marshall and so on, and
something about the Indian delegate talking with Woo, the Chinese Communist
representative
delegate at the U.N. about a cease-fire, and the narrative breaks off.
MR. JOHNSON:
When was it that tre began pressing for a sanction for the declaration of
Chinese Communists were aggressors and a [?] sanction -- That came in
January, as I reeall. Had it come by this time yet?
Page data
- Page
- 4
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- dd8c09f5c7979fb3
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75851401
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75851401",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851401",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 5, Track 1",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851401",
"collections": [
"Dean Acheson Papers",
"Princeton Seminars Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722166-02-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722166-02-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722166-02-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 15,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75851401",
"label": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 5, Track 1",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851401"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75851401",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851401",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 5, Track 1",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851401",
"collections": [
"Dean Acheson Papers",
"Princeton Seminars Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722166-02-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722166-02-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722166-02-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 15,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851401",
"naId": 75851401,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 13,
"logicalDate": "1954-02-13",
"month": 2,
"year": 1954
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 4,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722166-02-04.jpg",
"mediaId": "dd8c09f5c7979fb3",
"ocrText": "2/13/54, Reel 5, Track 1, Pa\n4\nwit thPannikhar, in which he said that if our air force were used in China\nthat Russian air force would intervene. I think he went beyond that, even.\nDR. JESSUP:\nIn just thumbing through George Kennan's notes hyere, there seems to be a\nmight have\ngood deal about his continuous study of what the Fussians/had in mind, question\nwhe ther it would be useful to have negotiations -\nDR. OPPENHEIMER: He was involved in this.\nDR. JESSUP:\nwith them. That was one of the things Webb asked him to consider and he\napparently discussed it with you. His narrative is very much broken here,\nHe was away from July to December, and then was down just for a few days.\nDR. OPPENHEIMER: It was December, I think, when he went to Washington to discuss this\nquestion.\nDR. JESSUP:\nThat's right. That was the time he wrote that memorandum, that was when he\ntalked withWEbb and Webb asked him specifically to consider whether it would\nbe useful to have a direct approach to the Russians with a view to bringing\na A\nto\nabout a cease-fire in Korea. Then that was when he wrote the memorandum that\nU.S. GOM\nyou read as to our general attitude and there was an analysis of an editorial\nin PRAVDA which had been broadcast in English to the United States sixteen\ntimes in 24 hours, which by its language seemed quite possibly to have been\nwritten by Stalin himself. George summarizes the gist of that as in effect\nsaying \"You had your chance to settle this business at a reasonable point;\nyou did not do it. What possible motive could you have had for going further\nunless it was the thought of making war on communist China?\" And then\nit\nends, there is a note here \"Passage not completed\". It goes on with some\ntechnical discussion about beachhead and talk with Marshall and so on, and\nsomething about the Indian delegate talking with Woo, the Chinese Communist\nrepresentative\ndelegate at the U.N. about a cease-fire, and the narrative breaks off.\nMR. JOHNSON:\nWhen was it that tre began pressing for a sanction for the declaration of\nChinese Communists were aggressors and a [?] sanction -- That came in\nJanuary, as I reeall. Had it come by this time yet?"
}