Ask the Scholar
Page 9 of 12
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
3/14/54: Reel 7, :ack 2, Page 9
A
in France, while this weakness of government from the point of view of
making decisions has been true for a long time, there has been no change
in the highly centralized bureaucracy of administrative control. There-
fore there is a very distinct difference in France between government,
in the sense of making national decisions, and administration, which is
centralized bureaucracy. Bureaucracy gets in everybody's hair. It is so
omnipresent that dealing with it is through corruption and evasion, which
has become very far-reaching It is said in France that, while governments
change, ministers do not; therefore there is more stability in France
than appears to be the case. This I think is not a correct analysis. It
is true, for instance, that Bidault and Schuman have been in the Foreign
Office-one or the other of them-since 1946; but this does not mean that
in
there is any greater capacity/fox dealing with the central problem, in
had
making the central decision. And while I think Schuman, XR a period of
most brilliant leadership in international affairs, it was a leadership
that had no roots, either in the French people or in the parliamentary
group, so that when you came to the point of making the last, ultimate
difficult decision, what happened? Schuman had to leave, because he was
WAN
the fellow associated kyxx with the EDC, and you had to have somebody
who was as much like him as possible, party-wise and otherwise, except
N
U.S.
who was not committed to it as deeply, and that was Bidault. I should
think that it is fair to say-I don' it know about this, but I would gather
this from Mr. Furness's monograph, that in certain ministries where admini-
stration is more important than basic decisions, such as agriculture,
there has been more continuity, by the result of a minister's staying
there through successive governments. I do not think that the continua-
creates
tion of individual ministers increases administrative power or/makex any
greater ability to make decisions. Now, this brings us to the question-
is there anything that can be done about this? I don it know whether
there is anything that can be done about it, and x what I a.m proposing
Page data
- Page
- 9
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 803158da2e251a9d
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75851930
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75851930",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851930",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 7, Track 2",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851930",
"collections": [
"Dean Acheson Papers",
"Princeton Seminars Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722168-14-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722168-14-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722168-14-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 12,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75851930",
"label": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 7, Track 2",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851930"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75851930",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851930",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 7, Track 2",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851930",
"collections": [
"Dean Acheson Papers",
"Princeton Seminars Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722168-14-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722168-14-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722168-14-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 12,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75851930",
"naId": 75851930,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 14,
"logicalDate": "1954-03-14",
"month": 3,
"year": 1954
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 9,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722168-14-09.jpg",
"mediaId": "803158da2e251a9d",
"ocrText": "3/14/54: Reel 7, :ack 2, Page 9\nA\nin France, while this weakness of government from the point of view of\nmaking decisions has been true for a long time, there has been no change\nin the highly centralized bureaucracy of administrative control. There-\nfore there is a very distinct difference in France between government,\nin the sense of making national decisions, and administration, which is\ncentralized bureaucracy. Bureaucracy gets in everybody's hair. It is so\nomnipresent that dealing with it is through corruption and evasion, which\nhas become very far-reaching It is said in France that, while governments\nchange, ministers do not; therefore there is more stability in France\nthan appears to be the case. This I think is not a correct analysis. It\nis true, for instance, that Bidault and Schuman have been in the Foreign\nOffice-one or the other of them-since 1946; but this does not mean that\nin\nthere is any greater capacity/fox dealing with the central problem, in\nhad\nmaking the central decision. And while I think Schuman, XR a period of\nmost brilliant leadership in international affairs, it was a leadership\nthat had no roots, either in the French people or in the parliamentary\ngroup, so that when you came to the point of making the last, ultimate\ndifficult decision, what happened? Schuman had to leave, because he was\nWAN\nthe fellow associated kyxx with the EDC, and you had to have somebody\nwho was as much like him as possible, party-wise and otherwise, except\nN\nU.S.\nwho was not committed to it as deeply, and that was Bidault. I should\nthink that it is fair to say-I don' it know about this, but I would gather\nthis from Mr. Furness's monograph, that in certain ministries where admini-\nstration is more important than basic decisions, such as agriculture,\nthere has been more continuity, by the result of a minister's staying\nthere through successive governments. I do not think that the continua-\ncreates\ntion of individual ministers increases administrative power or/makex any\ngreater ability to make decisions. Now, this brings us to the question-\nis there anything that can be done about this? I don it know whether\nthere is anything that can be done about it, and x what I a.m proposing"
}