Ask the Scholar

Page 5 of 14
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 5

OCR

5/15/548 Reel 3, Track 2, Page 5 exactly any hopes of bringing them together, without/saying who was responsible for their being so far apart. MR. NITZE: What we did with Mossie was to go back to Mossie and say that--the price we had never gotten clear on price with Mossie, and we put the whole musknu K emphasis on the business of price and asked to meet with his whole oil Board that and delegation. This meeting with the oil Commission/he had with him was after Us. we had gotten the turn-down from the British. MR. McGHEE: That's right; but we didn't tell him. We thought we'd just continue his education as long as we could. MR. NITZE: But Mossie knew exactly what we were doing and why we were doing it; ** he knew perfectly clearly we had made a proposition to the British and had gotten turned down and that we were covering our tracks. MR. McGHEE: He knew with great dignity; he knew he'd lost and why, although he didn't question kim us too ruch when we tried to put it off on price. Of course we never told him that the British weren't interested in discussing it with ** him and told us to send him home, which is basically what they did. But he understood when he was beaten and took it with great dignity. The-it's very interesting, though, his reactions net to the thing was--Paul and I would go over and over these technical considerations and show him that he had absolutely no hope of getting any more for his oil than the prices we mentioned ertainly not what he wanted-and how dependent he was on foreign oil-the international oil companies for his market. And he said, "No, you don't understand; this is a political issue." He'd never admit that this was an economic problem; ine failed to understand that it was a political problem. At the end, I don't think we had any assurance, even if the Briti sh had been willing, that we could have negotiated a satisfactory deal. of course we were disappointed because we would have liked to have been able to try, and we were never in a position to press him, because we never knew where we stood with the British. If we had

Page data

Page
5
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
2d6a4a1f0c54a37a
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75852016
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75852016",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 3, Track 2",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016",
    "collections": [
        "Dean Acheson Papers",
        "Princeton Seminars Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 14,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75852016",
    "label": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 3, Track 2",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75852016",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 3, Track 2",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016",
    "collections": [
        "Dean Acheson Papers",
        "Princeton Seminars Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 14,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852016",
    "naId": 75852016,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 15,
            "logicalDate": "1954-05-15",
            "month": 5,
            "year": 1954
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 5,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-06-05.jpg",
    "mediaId": "2d6a4a1f0c54a37a",
    "ocrText": "5/15/548 Reel 3, Track 2, Page 5\nexactly\nany hopes of bringing them together, without/saying who was responsible\nfor their being so far apart.\nMR. NITZE:\nWhat we did with Mossie was to go back to Mossie and say that--the price\nwe had never gotten clear on price with Mossie, and we put the whole musknu\nK\nemphasis on the business of price and asked to meet with his whole oil\nBoard that\nand\ndelegation. This meeting with the oil Commission/he had with him was after\nUs.\nwe had gotten the turn-down from the British.\nMR. McGHEE:\nThat's right; but we didn't tell him. We thought we'd just continue his\neducation as long as we could.\nMR. NITZE:\nBut Mossie knew exactly what we were doing and why we were doing it; ** he\nknew perfectly clearly\nwe had made a proposition to the British and had\ngotten turned down and that we were covering our tracks.\nMR. McGHEE:\nHe knew with great dignity; he knew he'd lost and why, although he didn't\nquestion kim us too ruch when we tried to put it off on price. Of course\nwe never told him that the British weren't interested in discussing it\nwith ** him and told us to send him home, which is basically what they did.\nBut he understood when he was beaten and took it with great dignity.\nThe-it's very interesting, though, his reactions net to the thing was--Paul\nand I would go over and over these technical considerations and show him\nthat he had absolutely no hope of getting any more for his oil than the\nprices we mentioned ertainly not what he wanted-and how dependent he\nwas on foreign oil-the international oil companies for his market. And\nhe said, \"No, you don't understand; this is a political issue.\" He'd never\nadmit that this was an economic problem; ine failed to understand that it\nwas a political problem. At the end, I don't think we had any assurance,\neven if the Briti sh had been willing, that we could have negotiated a\nsatisfactory deal. of course we were disappointed because we would have\nliked to have been able to try, and we were never in a position to press\nhim, because we never knew where we stood with the British. If we had"
}