Ask the Scholar

Page 8 of 17
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 8

OCR

5/15/54: Reel 4, Track 2, Page 8 such motive in mind when he insituted that proceeding==quite different ones- I think that the fact that the thing had been started might well have been helpful in the event that having been started, it could have been called off something on proper grounds, and it made these fellows interested in doing/wirat they might otherwise not have done. MR. NITZE: Well, I think that as long as there was a chance that this was going to be done, they wanted in on it; they probably wouldn't have liked to have the thing happen at all. But if it was going to happen, I think they all wanted in on it. discussion MR. ACHESON: We had a very amusing-not amusing, it was pretty one afternoon when we got the Attorney General, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of War, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, all into the-mand talked about getting these companies into this thing, and they is Us a RT. would have to have some lind of dispensation. And Emerglick was fighting very strongly against any kind of a dispensation at all with the anti- trust laws. And we pointed out that if we couldn't solve this thing and it seemed the only way you could solve it was to get the American companies in a way which to come in/ must violate the anti-trust law, unless they had some suxt labor on this. It was just insoluble; you couldn't possibly deal with it. And the country might go to hell; the Russians would take it over, and Emerglick said that he didn' 't think that that had any bearing on the national interest of the United States, which was to enforce the anti-trust laws. And Brad said, "Well, it'11 have a good deal of effect on the national interest of the United States, because if you move the Soviet power from where it is all the way down through Irm to the Persian Gulf, the whole burden of defense and the whole rearrangement of the strategic plans of the United States are going to be pretty fast. " And Energlick listened to this and said, "General Bradley, I don't agree with you. And to my great surprise, Brad just said, "oh, don't you?"

Page data

Page
8
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
f3ad6def1b24dc19
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75852048
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75852048",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852048",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 5, Track 2",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852048",
    "collections": [
        "Dean Acheson Papers",
        "Princeton Seminars Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-08-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-08-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-08-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 17,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75852048",
    "label": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 5, Track 2",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852048"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75852048",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852048",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 5, Track 2",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852048",
    "collections": [
        "Dean Acheson Papers",
        "Princeton Seminars Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-08-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-08-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-08-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 17,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75852048",
    "naId": 75852048,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 15,
            "logicalDate": "1954-05-15",
            "month": 5,
            "year": 1954
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 8,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722169-08-08.jpg",
    "mediaId": "f3ad6def1b24dc19",
    "ocrText": "5/15/54: Reel 4, Track 2, Page 8\nsuch motive in mind when he insituted that proceeding==quite different ones-\nI think that the fact that the thing had been started might well have been\nhelpful in the event that having been started, it could have been called off\nsomething\non proper grounds, and it made these fellows interested in doing/wirat they\nmight otherwise not have done.\nMR. NITZE:\nWell, I think that as long as there was a chance that this was going to be\ndone, they wanted in on it; they probably wouldn't have liked to have the\nthing happen at all. But if it was going to happen, I think they all wanted\nin on it.\ndiscussion\nMR. ACHESON:\nWe had a very amusing-not amusing, it was pretty one\nafternoon when we got the Attorney General, the Secretary of the Treasury,\nthe Secretary of War, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, all\ninto the-mand talked about getting these companies into this thing, and they\nis Us a RT.\nwould have to have some lind of dispensation. And Emerglick was fighting\nvery strongly against any kind of a dispensation at all with the anti-\ntrust laws. And we pointed out that if we couldn't solve this thing and\nit seemed the only way you could solve it was to get the American companies\nin a way which\nto come in/ must violate the anti-trust law, unless they had some suxt\nlabor on this. It was just insoluble; you couldn't possibly deal with it.\nAnd the country might go to hell; the Russians would take it over, and\nEmerglick said that he didn' 't think that that had any bearing on the national\ninterest of the United States, which was to enforce the anti-trust laws.\nAnd Brad said, \"Well, it'11 have a good deal of effect on the national\ninterest of the United States, because if you move the Soviet power from\nwhere it is all the way down through Irm to the Persian Gulf, the whole\nburden of defense and the whole rearrangement of the strategic plans of\nthe United States are going to be pretty fast. \" And Energlick listened to\nthis and said, \"General Bradley, I don't agree with you. And to my great\nsurprise, Brad just said, \"oh, don't you?\""
}