Memorandum, "Summary of New Omnibus Immigration and Naturalization Bill"
Images (4)
Document
| id |
id
295025070
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 4SUMMARY OF NAV
OMNIBUS IMMIGRATION AND NATUR/LIZATION BILL
The proposed new omnibus immigration and naturalization bill (New Omnibus
Bill) would moderniz the quota system by basing quotas on the 1950 census (thus
increasing the total quota), would provide greater flexibility in the operation
of the quota system by allowing the pooling of unused quotas, and would eliminate
racial discrimination. It would admit to this country additional classes of
deserving aliens without regard to quota restrictions and would establish a
system of preferences, based on national need and family reunion, for most cuota
immigrants while at the same time reserving a portion of each quota for self-
initiated imigration. The New Omnibus Pill would assure adequate review of
denial of visas and denial of admission to this country and would make the
licCarran-Velter Administrative Procedure Act applicable to deportation cases. It
would provide adequate protection against subversive and other undesirable
aliens without resorting to abusable and repressive restrictions.
In these provisions and in other vital matters of substance the New
Omnibus Bill differs from S. 2550, recently reported by the Senate Judiciary
Committee. The two bills correspond in general form, and in making many technical
changes involved in codifying existing immigration and naturalization laws.
The following summary of the major provisions of the I Jew Omnibus Bill
emphasizes the principal changes that would be made in existing law and the
most important differences between the New Omnibus Bill and S. 2550.
1. Non-quota status: The New Omnibus Bill would add several new classes of
non-quota immigrants to those of existing law. Recognizing
the desirability of reuniting families, the bill would exempt the immigrant
parents of citizens from quota limitations. Other classes deserving special
consideration to which non-quota status would be accorded are orphans entering
the country for adoption and immigrants who have served honorably in the armed
forces. "xisting laws grant non-quota status to immigrants born in Canada or
in independent countries in Latin America but deny such status to immigrants
born in colonies or dependent areas in the Western Hemisphere. The New Omnibus
Bill would correct this obvious inequity. Furthermore, S. 2550 would reguire
professors, who are now admitted as non-quota immigrants, to enter under quota
restrictions. S. 2550 places unnecessary restrictions even on the time=honored
non-quota status of religious ministers. The New Omnibus Bill would strengthen
the provisions of existing law in regard to both ministers and professors.
2. Quotas: While adhering to the principle of establishing a ceiling on
inmigration and while retaining the national origins quota system
as the basis for the initial allocation of quotas, the New Omnibus Bill would
make a number of much-needed improvements in the operation of the quota system.
By providing for the use of the 1950 census as the basis for calculating
quotas, rather than basing quotas on the 1920 census as would S. 2550, the New
Omnibus Bill would take into account increases in population and changes in the
composition of the population which have taken place in the last thirty years.
The New Omnibus Bill would amend existing law so as to eliminate
racially discriminatory features remaining from the Oriental Exclusion Act
the features which have been so bitterly resented throughout Asia. S. 2550,
too, purports to eliminate racial discrimination, but, instead, merely disguises
it in a new form. In S. 2550 certain Oriental nations are given, for the first
time, minimum quotas of 100 and the right to naturalization. But in place of
outright exclusion, there is substituted the novel concept of an "Asia-Pacific
Triangle" with a total limit of immigration from this area, and a mortgage
against quotas in this area for all immigrants, wherever born, who can trace as
much as 50% of their ancestry back to this area, however remotely.
The New Omnibus Bill abjures not only this new form of racial discrimin-
ation but all other racial discrimination existing in present law. Thus, the New
Omnibus Bill rejects the intolerable exclusion of American Negroes from the census
for purposes of establishing quotas, an exclusion provided in the Immigration Act
of 1924 and proposed to be perpetuated in S. 2550.
Also the New Omnibus Bill would grant equal non-quota status to all nations
and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere, avoiding the further racially
discriminating feature of S. 2550 which limits to 100 the possible immigrants
from colonies, even those within the western hemisphere; this feature of S. 2550
discriminates especially against the natives of Jamaica, Trinidad, and other
Caribbean dependencies. (present law gives these latter nationals the equivalent
of non-quota status by charging immigrants from these dependencies against the
quotas of the mother countries).
Relations
belongs_to