Ask the Scholar
Page 262 of 363
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
9
Box 3 (continued)
Administration of Nationwide Productivity Drives
National
Regional
Governing
Industry, Labor,
Country
Ministerial
Center
Centers
Board
Universities, etc.
13. Turkey
Two ministries
OECEI
All regions
Inter-Ministerial
Management, labor,
marketing, person-
nel
14. United
Two ministries,
BPC
100+ local centers;
Board of Trade; Mo-
All sectors
Kingdom
Board of Trade
British Institute of
nopolies Commission;
Management, BPC,
National Research De-
NIFES, British Stan-
velopment Corp.; Dept.
dards, academic bodies
of Scientific and Indus-
trial Research
15. Spain
6 industrial regions
Board of Directors;
Federations of Em-
20-30 liaison council
ployers and Eco-
nomic Organiza-
tions; Japan Man-
agement Associates
16. Japan
Several govern-
JPC
All regions
Board of Directors 15;
All national groups
ment ministries
government
17. Taiwan
Several govern-
CDC
3
Labor, management
All industry and
ment ministries
societies, universities
distribution sectors
2.12
In smaller or less industrialized nations such as Austria, Norway, Sweden and Iceland,
Productivity programs and regional activities took place without the benefit of formal centralized Productivity
Centers. These countries concentrated on Productivity Team visits, on the use and dissemination of the
various U.S. Technical Assistance aids, and on seminars and training programs. Some countries, like Belgium
and Denmark, organized inclusive across-the-board programs aimed at all sectors, to cover management,
engineering, marketing, material handling, packaging and other areas important in productivity restructuring.
Germany followed the same course channeling its Productivity restructuring activities through its long
established RKW organization for the rationalization of industry. The German program was later enlarged
to operate through ten District groups.
2.13
The larger European nations had substantial Productivity program staffs and complex
organizations of sector, regional, and local Productivity groups. The U.K. was alone in dispersing its
operations (with the exception of the numerous Productivity Teams) through the delegation of projects and
funds among a wide range of private and public research, educational, and engineering institutes. It relied on
its strong industry associations and labor unions to carry the burden of inter-plant exchanges and training.
France was unique in the scale, originality of organization and comprehensive range of centralized, sector, and
regional programs. France evidenced the largest commitment of a program to reach into every corner of the
nation.
2.14
For Western Europe, what was unprecedented was the span of the National Productivity
Drives, the national commitments, the scope in terms of utilizing every media of study and training, the extent
of research, and the priority and publicity spread through much of the communication media. The swift gains
in productivity which took place for most nations over the first few years mark an achievement unique in the
era of industrialization.
TRUMAN
HARRY
NARA
LIBRARY
Page data
- Page
- 262
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 91519deaf12e4f81
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 6235211
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "6235211",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6235211",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "\"History of the Technical Assistance Programs of the Marshall Plan and Successor Agencies, 1948-1961\"",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6235211",
"collections": [
"James M. Silberman Papers",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-jms/6039382/6235211/6235211-001.tif",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-jms/6039382/6235211/6235211-001.tif",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-jms/6039382/6235211/6235211-001.tif",
"imageCount": 363,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "6235211",
"label": "\"History of the Technical Assistance Programs of the Marshall Plan and Successor Agencies, 1948-1961\"",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6235211"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "6235211",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6235211",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "\"History of the Technical Assistance Programs of the Marshall Plan and Successor Agencies, 1948-1961\"",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6235211",
"collections": [
"James M. Silberman Papers",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-jms/6039382/6235211/6235211-001.tif",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-jms/6039382/6235211/6235211-001.tif",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-jms/6039382/6235211/6235211-001.tif",
"imageCount": 363,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6235211",
"naId": 6235211,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 262,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-jms/6039382/6235211/6235211-262.tif",
"mediaId": "91519deaf12e4f81",
"ocrText": "9\nBox 3 (continued)\nAdministration of Nationwide Productivity Drives\nNational\nRegional\nGoverning\nIndustry, Labor,\nCountry\nMinisterial\nCenter\nCenters\nBoard\nUniversities, etc.\n13. Turkey\nTwo ministries\nOECEI\nAll regions\nInter-Ministerial\nManagement, labor,\nmarketing, person-\nnel\n14. United\nTwo ministries,\nBPC\n100+ local centers;\nBoard of Trade; Mo-\nAll sectors\nKingdom\nBoard of Trade\nBritish Institute of\nnopolies Commission;\nManagement, BPC,\nNational Research De-\nNIFES, British Stan-\nvelopment Corp.; Dept.\ndards, academic bodies\nof Scientific and Indus-\ntrial Research\n15. Spain\n6 industrial regions\nBoard of Directors;\nFederations of Em-\n20-30 liaison council\nployers and Eco-\nnomic Organiza-\ntions; Japan Man-\nagement Associates\n16. Japan\nSeveral govern-\nJPC\nAll regions\nBoard of Directors 15;\nAll national groups\nment ministries\ngovernment\n17. Taiwan\nSeveral govern-\nCDC\n3\nLabor, management\nAll industry and\nment ministries\nsocieties, universities\ndistribution sectors\n2.12\nIn smaller or less industrialized nations such as Austria, Norway, Sweden and Iceland,\nProductivity programs and regional activities took place without the benefit of formal centralized Productivity\nCenters. These countries concentrated on Productivity Team visits, on the use and dissemination of the\nvarious U.S. Technical Assistance aids, and on seminars and training programs. Some countries, like Belgium\nand Denmark, organized inclusive across-the-board programs aimed at all sectors, to cover management,\nengineering, marketing, material handling, packaging and other areas important in productivity restructuring.\nGermany followed the same course channeling its Productivity restructuring activities through its long\nestablished RKW organization for the rationalization of industry. The German program was later enlarged\nto operate through ten District groups.\n2.13\nThe larger European nations had substantial Productivity program staffs and complex\norganizations of sector, regional, and local Productivity groups. The U.K. was alone in dispersing its\noperations (with the exception of the numerous Productivity Teams) through the delegation of projects and\nfunds among a wide range of private and public research, educational, and engineering institutes. It relied on\nits strong industry associations and labor unions to carry the burden of inter-plant exchanges and training.\nFrance was unique in the scale, originality of organization and comprehensive range of centralized, sector, and\nregional programs. France evidenced the largest commitment of a program to reach into every corner of the\nnation.\n2.14\nFor Western Europe, what was unprecedented was the span of the National Productivity\nDrives, the national commitments, the scope in terms of utilizing every media of study and training, the extent\nof research, and the priority and publicity spread through much of the communication media. The swift gains\nin productivity which took place for most nations over the first few years mark an achievement unique in the\nera of industrialization.\nTRUMAN\nHARRY\nNARA\nLIBRARY"
}