Document
Telegram from Ambassador Stanley Woodward to Secretary of State Dean Acheson
- Part of Korean War Files (Truman Administration), Department of State Files
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 230
INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
4
PLAIN
A
Action
Control: 13982
Rec'd: April 28, 1951
EUR
FROM: Ottawa
4:42 doul.
SEEN
Info
TO: Secretary of State
SS
G
NO:
265, April 27.
P
SAM
FE
On April 26 External Affairs Min Pearson said in reply CCF
UNA
question in House of Commons regarding "announcement" enemy
USUN
air bases in Manchuria will be attacked if Chinese Commies use
OLI
heavy air power against UN troops:
CIA
ARMY
"I would say that so far as the govt is aware, no announcement
AIR
on the subject has been made. The Hon Member is presumably
NAVY
referring to a report in this morning's newspapers which is
IE
attributed to a spokesman for the US delegation at Lake Success.
PA
However, I am very glad to have this opportunity of making a
DCR
brief statement of the govt's position in regard to this matter.
"Some 5 months ago the govt informed the US Govt, in response
to an inquiry from that govt -- they brought the matter up --
that, though a strong case cld be made under international law
that the UN Commander in Chief had the right to. retaliate against
any air attacks launched from Manchuria, we considered it important
as indeed did other govts, that no military operations take place
outside Korean borders without specific authority from the UN.
Since that time various aspects of the Korean operations have
been the subject of discussions in Washington, as indeed I
have indicated previously in the House, among representatives
of the countries having forces in Korea.
"So far, however, the Canadian Govt has received no request for
concurrence in any proposal to authorize UN retaliation upon
enemy air bases outside Korea, probably for the very good reason
that there have been no massive enemy air bombing from Manchuria.
If there is such air intervention, for the consequences of which
the Chinese Commies would have to bear full responsibility, it
is our view that thosecountries with forces in Korea, and
participating in military operations there, should be consulted
in regard to the implications of that action - that is, air
bombing - and in regard to any retaliatory action which may be
required to meet it.
"However, it is of course possible to visualize a situation where
immediate retaliatory action, without consultation, might be
unavoidable in pursuing enemy bombers back to the Manchurian
air base from which they came. The decision on the spot to take
such immediate retaliatory action would presumably be based on
overriding considerations of military security.
"In any
PLAIN
REPRODUCTION OF THIS
MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to