Document
Telegram from Warren Austin to Secretary of State Dean Acheson
- Part of Korean War Files (Truman Administration), Department of State Files
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State
BE
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
26
room
Action
Control: 10309
Rec'd:
Ju-y 19, 1951
UNA
FROM: New York
8:53 p.m.
Info
SS
TO: Secretary of State
G
DECLASSIFIED
L
NO: 115, July 19, 7:07 p.m.
STATE LTR. 4-25-79
EUR
MT7A-13
FE
By
NLTH
NARS, Date 7-24-79
P
PRIORITY.
DCR
Re post Korean armistice action by UN.
In course of conversation with Jebb and Lacoste this afternoon
on another subject being separately reported, Jebb raised
question post Korean armistice action by UN. Said he had
reported to FONOFF his strong view (USUN's 59, July 10) that
report on armistice should be made to SC. Said reply from
FONOFF supported his view and UK Embassy Washington had been
instructed take matter up with Dept which it had done (apparently
with Rusk)
Jebb said FO NOFF believed report on armistice should be made
through SC for "ratification" and that this purpose could be
achieved by an "anodyne" res which would be very difficult
for Russians to veto and which they might even find it possible
to support. Jebb then gave us following text of res he had
drafted and sent back to London but on which he had not yet
received comment:
"The SC
"Having received the report from the UC of such and such a
date, notes with approval the conclusion of an armistice in
Korea and expresses its profound satisfaction that hostilities
have been brought to an end on terms acceptable to the UN,
requests the GA to consider the measures which should now be
taken to bring about a final settlement in Korea in accordance
with the principles and objectives of the UN. 11
Gross gave our callers Dept's thinking on this question as
set forth in DEPTEL 30, June 14. Jebb indicated preference
for alternative along lines of (c), although he would probably
have doubt concerning substance of type of res Dept has in
mind.
Lacoste indicated he had recommended strongly to FONOFF his
view that report should be made to SC and had received reply
indicating French FONOFF already held this view.
In conversation with Rau at lunch yesterday he said to Gross
and Ross
REPRODUCTION OF THIS
ESSAGE IS PROHIBITED
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to