Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
37209463
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3Please return
MEETING THE LABOR SITUATION
Cabinet meeting meeting Lata
Cabinet Meeting - November 30, 1945
CR
: AND
At this juncture it is clear that the Labor Management Conference
will fail to agree on mechanisms and procedures for preventing industrial
strife and that responsibility for action will rest on the government.
It is also clear that in its present frame of mind the Congress, if left
to act on its own initiative, will probably enact legislation which may
well be resented by both management and labor and, on balance, probably be
adverse to the interest of labor. In this setting it is proposed that
the Administration be prepared to adopt a labor policy, as necessary, in
the following stages:
1. As a first step, the Administration should support the McMahon
bill (S. 1419). This bill contains provisions for fact finding
boards of inquiry, strengthened mediation and conciliation
services, and a Federal board of arbitration for voluntary use.
It in no way infringes the right of labor to strike or the
right of management to shut down.
2. As a first step beyond the McMahon bill, it is proposed that
the Administration support a measure requiring compulsory
arbitration, in industries affecting public health or safety,
including public utilities, if management and labor do not
voluntarily agree upon arbitration procedures.
These two steps would undoubtedly be fully condoned by public opinion and
would on the whole probably not meet with too intense antagonism on the
part of either management or labor. These steps, however, would still fall
short of providing a solution to the strikes such as the General Motors
strike or the imminent steel strike. To meet these types of situations
the Administration should be prepared to support:
3. Legislation which would compel, under penalties, the use of
arbitration procedure in industries in which S trikes or shut-
downs would interfere with the free flow of interstate commerce
if disputants have not voluntarily agreed to arbitration
procedure, for avoiding the industrial strife based on dis-
agreements under existing contracts.
These steps, although they would limit labor's freedom to strike
or management's freedom to shut down, would not completely abrogate these
rights. Strikes and shutdowns would still be possible prior to the
negotiation of a contract or subsequent to its termination. It is felt
that the Administration should not contemplate compulsory arbitration
in such situations at this time, although it should make every effort
to assist labor and management to arrive at peaceful agreements through
collective bargaining, fact finding, mediation, and conciliation.
Terms
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to