Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
197026178
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3OFFICE OF
DECLASSIFIED
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
WASHINGTON
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
March 5, 1952
By DEB NLT, Date SECRE 9-9-85 SECURITY INFORMATION
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
IRAN
We have informed Embassy Tehran we seriously question the
wisdom of the intention of the International Bank representative in
Iran, Mr. Prudhomme, to predicate further oil discussions upon Iranian
agreement to permit the Bank to employ British technicians. We believe this
is not the best means of obtaining Iranian agreement to this point and that if
the Iranians fail to agree, this would be politically the best point for Mosadeq
to break negotiations on. We have discussed this with Bank Jice-President
Garner who said it was not his intention to break negotiations on this point.
Rather, Garner thought if no progress can be made, Prudhomme¹s eventual
position would be that the Bank was presently unable to see a way of operating
effectively unless it has full managerial authority, but that the Bank would
continue to study the matter and hoped the Iranians would do likewise. Our
position will be influenced by Embassy reports on the progress of negotia- -
tions. However, we believe that more is to be gained by not closing the door
and by continuing the talks. We explored with Garner the possibility of
American companies making technicians available to assure that oil opera- -
tions could be conducted on a basis which would not reflect on the Bank's
standing. Our idea is that this might facilitate the gradual introduction of
limited numbers of British personnel. Mr. Garner expressed interest in
this idea.
UNITED KINGDOM
Embassy London reports that yesterday's vote within
the Parliamentary Labor Party on the Bevanite
motion deploring the scale of present rearmament because of its effect on the
economy, aid to underdeveloped areas and reduction in social services, was
important in the struggle between Bevan and Labor Party moderates. This is
the first time since Parliament reassembled that an issue with Bevan has
been forced to a vote and he lost by a three to one margin. As a result, the
self-confidence of the labor party leadership has been restored and they now
feel that they have regained the initiative and control of policy. The Embassy
points out, however, that Bevan left himself an "out" in that he did not sign
the left-wing motion and did not speak at the meeting. Since a vote for the
motion was tantamount to vote against Atlee, the Bevanites may feel therefore,
that their defeat was not too severe since, even in these circumstances, they
mustered the support of one in every four members of Parliament.
SEGRET SECURITY INFORMATION