Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
197026183
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
Dept. 12065, Sec. March 3-402
E.O. Guidelines, 9-9-55 6, 1982
WASHINGTON
State By DEB NLT,
March 12, 1952
SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
USSR
Mr. Eden telephoned Ambassador Gifford yesterday to urge that
the US and Great Britain should consult before making any public
comments in regard to the Russian note on the German peace treaty. Gifford
has commented to the Department that there will probably be a strong public
reaction in the UK in favor of a positive response to the Soviet note, par-
ticularly in the left-wing of the Labor Party. Gifford also warns that there
is a widespread belief in Britain that the US tends to reject out of hand any
Soviet overtures, and feels that this makes it all the more important to
coordinate fully with the British and French the general lines of our reaction
to the Soviet note.
The Foreign Office has told our Embassy that it believes the over-
riding consideration in our reply to the Soviets should be to prevent any
delay in the contractual agreement with the Germans and the European Defense
Community negotiations. It believes, moreover, that the worst possible
development could be our involvement at this time in another face-to-face
conference with the Russians which they could string out indefinitely. It
would hope therefore to devise a reply roughly analogous to Adenauer's 14-
point reply to the East German unification proposal last September, laying
great emphasis on the necessary pre-conditions for unification.
Mr. McCloy reports from Bonn that the High Commissioners dis- -
cussed the Soviet note with Chancellor Adenauer yesterday. The French
High Commissioner, M. Francois-Poncet, interpreted the note as another
delaying tactic designed to tie up discussion in the same manner as the
Austrian treaty, the Korean truce negotiations, etc. He felt that in replying
the Allies should, on the assumption that the Soviet note pre-supposed general
elections, reply that they have always been prepared to see general elections
held in Germany when they could be certain that such elections would be free;
the UN Commission, however, had not been allowed in the Soviet Zone.
Until the Soviets manifested their good faith by establishing conditions for free
elections their proposals could not be considered to be sincere.
Chancellor Adenauer stated that the Federal cabinet had discussed
the Soviet note that morning and that German policy would in no way be changed
by the note. Adenauer said, however, that the Government's press officer
had been instructed to develop a press campaign designed to clarify the picture,
because he believed that the note was "seductive". Adenauer expressed the
hope that no four-power conference would be held as a result of the note.
SECRET SECURITY INF ORMATION