Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
200356600
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2X
101
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
State
? 1979
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
By NLL
WASHINGTON
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
April 5, 1948
State Dept. Guideline, June 12, 1979
By NLT- NC
NARS, Date 11-13-10
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
SOVIET UNION
A study just completed by the joint intelligence
committee of Embassy Moscow concludes that the USSR
will not resort to military action in the immediate future but will
continue to attempt to secure its objectives by other means. A
decision for military action would be made only if the Kremlin con-
cludes that an immediate war offers the best chance for achieving
ultimate Soviet objectives, and this decision is more likely to arise
one to two years from now than during the coming year.
GERMANY
We have informed Ambassador Douglas in London that we
are not so concerned about the possibility of a Soviet
announcement of the establishment of a German government, since this
would clearly shift responsibility to the USSR for splitting Germany
and in view of the present character of the German People's Congress
would be recognized as a patent fraud. The impact of any such Soviet
move would probably enable us to get early agreement on a similar
announcement by the western powers.
SPAIN
Embassy Madrid has been instructed to point out to
the Spanish Foreign Minister and other government
leaders the fact that our final decision on including Spain in ERP
clearly illustrates the necessity of their taking steps along lines
previously indicated by us if Spanish relations with the US and west-
ern Europe are to become fully normal.
ITALY
We are suggesting to the Greek Government that it con-
sider the possibility of announcing at an early date
its desire to take the lead in proposing the general renunciation of
reparations from Italy. We feel that this proposal would do much to
influence favorably the coming Italian elections, would strengthen the
position of Greece in the Mediterranean and in the US, and would under-
cut a possible Soviet proposal along similar lines.
IRAN
Ambassador Smith believes that the latest Soviet note
to Iran has ominous implications, since it suggests
that the Kremlin is laying the basis for a renewal of active interven-
tion in Iran. He considers it possible that Iran may be selected
deliberately, because of its remoteness from the US and the limited