Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
201696383
label
Memorandum, State Department Summary of Telegrams
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
201696383
contentType
document
title
Memorandum, State Department Summary of Telegrams
collections
Records of the Naval Aide to the President (Truman Administration)
State Department Briefs Files
subjects
Vyshinsky, Andrey Yanuaryevich, 1883-1954
Nehru, Jawaharlal, 1889-1964
Murphy, Robert D. (Robert Daniel), 1894-1978
Kirk, Alan Goodrich, 1888-1963
Gross, Ernest A. (Ernest Arnold), 1906-1999
Gromyko, Andrei Andreevich, 1909-
Bajpai, Girija Shankar, 1891-1954
Acheson, Dean, 1893-1971
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
201696383
levelOfDescription
item
productionDates
day
17
logicalDate
1950-01-17
month
1
year
1950
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
photo
mediaId
93ff3c201e17da94
ocrText
DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON DECLASSIFIED, January 17, 1950 E.O. Guidelines, March 5-10-85 6, 1982 12065, Sec. 3-402 S ICALI State By PEB Dept. NLT, Date SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS KASHMIR Replying to Secretary Acheson's message urging an amicable settlement of the Kashmir dispute, Indian Prime Minister Nehru --- acting through Secretary General for External Affairs Bajpai, now in New York -- has indicated that he considers Secretary Acheson's message "unfriendly in tone" and "seeking to bring pressure under threat of consequences" on the Indian government. Nehru's reply, read by Bajpai to Ambassador Gross in New York, states that: 1) the present approach could lead to "further deterioration" of the Kashmir dispute; 2) India does not consider that further negotiations at Lake Success could make significant progress; and 3) it is a matter of great "personal regret" to Nehru that the Secretary should send him such a message. After Gross expounded the US views, Bajpai informed him in reply to a question that, while Bajpai has no explicit instructions on the point, he agrees with Gross that India has "flatly rejected" further mediation efforts on the part of Canadian UN representative McNaughton. Bajpai added his personal view that there would be some advantages to the US taking up the matter through Embassy New Delhi. Gross believes, however, that the transfer to New Delhi of these negotiations would neutralize the influence of the Security Council, and he recommends that we continue to work through the SC. BELGIUM At a recent luncheon given in response to the US demonstrations of generosity toward Europe, Ambassador Murphy in Brussels was impressed by the free criticism of the manner in which our generosity is being applied. Murphy reports that the Belgian OEEC representative was lukewarm to our proposal that Spaak be appointed to a position of importance in the OEEC; that complaints were registered at the inability of ECA to give Belgium technical assistance; and that chagrin was expressed at the Eximbank's refusal of Belgium's application for a $50 million loan. AUSTRIA Ambassador Kirk in Moscow has been informed that Vyshinski cannot receive the three western ambassadors- -- who wish to state the western objections to Soviet delaying tactics on the Austrian treaty -- but that Deputy Foreign Minister Gromyko would receive them. Kirk does not plan to accept the appointment to see Gromyko, which he believes might lead to further stalling, and he has indicted to the Soviet government that he will wait for an appoint- ment with Vyshinski.