Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
202444159
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3NLTCMaval Aide)139
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
By
DEB NLT, Date 6-18-85
December 15, 1950
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
UNITED NATIONS
Following a discussion with the Chinese Com-
munist representatives, UN Secretary General
Lie informed Ambassador Gross that in his personal judgment there is
now no hope whatever that a cease-fire could be arranged with the Chinese
Communists and that the sooner the matter was disposed of, a vote taken
on the six-power resolution, and the General Assembly adjourned, the
better. Lie based this judgment on Chinese Communist representatives¹
reaction to his questions on the cease-fire resolution and on their blunt
refusal to permit representatives of the International Refugee Organization
to inspect prisoners-of-war - camps. With respect to the cease-fire resolu-
tion, Chinese Communist representative Wu told Lie that the Chinese
would not participate in negotiations regarding a cease-fire under any
conditions "other than those mentioned in Mr. Malik's speech yesterday. 11
Wu then summarized these conditions as involving: 1) withdrawal of "all
US and UN troops out of Korea, leaving Korea for the Koreans"; 2) settle-
ment of the Formosa question in connection with any cease-fire discussions;
and 3) any negotiations on these matters must be ''on equal terms, 11 which
Lie interpreted as a reference to the seating of Communist China in the UN.
Lie commented that Wu's replies appeared to be calculated and expressed
his personal opinion that it was now clear that the Chinese Communist
delegation was "under the thumb of Moscow. " With respect to Lie's desire
for early adjournment of the Assembly, Ambassador Gross expressed the
opinion that GA President Entezam will undoubtedly discuss with other
members of his cease-fire committee the problem of the duration of the
Assembly and his confidence that the committee will insist that the
Assembly be in a stand-by position until the committee has reached some
conclusion, whether affirmative or negative, on the possibilities of a cease-
fire.
Previously, Indian delegate Rau had informed
our delegation that communications from Peiping received by India indicated
that there was a good chance of a cease-fire being accepted by the Peiping
regime if certain preliminary points could be solved. These points were:
1) the withdrawal of foreign troops from Korea, which Rau felt would
TOPSECRET