Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 11
Filed by MR. DAWSON 252-R MAY 31 1952 ECEIVED m THE WHITE HOUSE JUN 18 1949 WASHINGTON DONALD S, DAWSON June 17, 1949 MEMORANDUM FOR MR. DAWSON: Subject: Proposal for Appointment of Advisory Committee to Examine Federal Loyalty Program and Recommend any Needed Changes to the President. With your memorandum to me of June 15, you enclosed an unaddressed memorandum of May 24, 1949, on this subject, entitled "Suggestions for Further Improvement of the Loyalty Order". I agree with the principal thesis of the May 24 memorandum. It would be desirable to set up an advisory committee or commission of dis- tinguished private citizens to examine the Federal loyalty program and re- commend to the President any changes which they deem desirable. to Did In a memorandum to Mr. Clifford, of May 5, 1949, I expressed my views on this matter in connection with a letter concerning the loyalty program dated April 28, 1949, which Morris Ernst sent to Mr. Connelly and which was referred to me by Mr. Clifford for comment. + In my May 5 memorandum to Mr. Clifford I said: In view of the virtual completion of the incumbent phase of the program, it seems to be an appropriate time to take a searching look at the loyalty program and determine what its future shape should be, insofar as new employees are concerned, (or old ones with respect to whom new charges may be made.) "I definitely favor the appointment by the President of a committee of distinguished citizens, whose views on the subject might be expected to command respect, to examine the whole program both under the Executive Order and in the sensitive agencies, and make recommendations to the President as to what, if any, changes should be made. "I have perhaps some slight bias in favor of the leyalty program because I was an alternate on the President's Temporary Commission on Employee Loyalty two years ago, and a member of the Working Committee of that Commission whose recommendations resulted in the creation of the program. It has seemed to me a middle-of-the-road solution of a most difficult problem on which there were widely divergent views - a reasonably judicious compromise in the never-ending struggle between freedom and security.