Memorandum from James Webb to President Harry S. Truman with Attachment
Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
310799864
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
BUREAU OF THE BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C.
JAN 7 1949
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
SUBJECT: Change in loyalty investigation procedure
At present Executive Order 9835, providing for the employee
loyalty program, requires the Civil Service Commission to make
specific name and record checks of nine sources of possible in-
formation regarding applicants for positions.
Data was secured from the Commission regarding the extent to
which each of such sources yielded information indicating neces-
sity for full-field investigations by the Federal Bureau of Inves-
tigation. It was found that approximately 85 percent of all the
loyalty cases referred to the FBI arose from information secured
from four sources and only 15 percent arose from the five remain-
ing sources. That 15 percent of cases involved approximately 45
percent of the total cost of record checks. Accordingly, it
appears that the mandatory checking by the Civil Service Commission
should be limited to four major sources and that the checking of
the remaining five sources should hereafter be discretionary with
the Commission. The funds for this function in the Commission's
1950 budget request were reduced on that basis. Concomitantly,
additional funds were included in the budget of the Civil Service
Commission for the purpose of reimbursing the Federal Bureau of
Investigation for investigating applicants for the so-called sensi-
tive positions in the Government; the Commission has no funds for
such investigations in the current fiscal year.
There is attached a draft of Presidential letter to the Presi-
dent of the Civil Service Commission which would limit the mandatory
name and record check investigations to the four most productive
sources and make the remaining five checks optional. The letter
draft was prepared by the Attorney General. While the Commission
is somewhat lukewarm to the change in investigation procedure, the
budgetary decision referred to above requires a modification of the
present elaborate procedure and the Commission agrees that a letter
such as the attached would accomplish such modification.
Attachment
I recommend transmittal of Jan the attached proposed letter.
E.Webe
Director
x79
GOVERNMENT
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to