Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 4
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
S.
2 e
US
At the Moason moeting of the on all four powers had agroed on
the noceasity for somo upward revision of the March, 1946, Plan.
In the tripartite talks in London, however, the Fronch were unable
to concur in the Revised Plan for the Bisonal Area; and the throe
delegations agreed "that the (Revised Plan) doss not projudy
quadripartite decisions of the Counoil of Foreign Ministers in respect
to the lovel of industry for Germany as a whole or such industrial
limitations as may be imposed by the peade settlement". The Soviets,
while denounoing the Revised Plan as a unilateral act, have not
formulated their objections to it in any. concrete fashion.
In ganeral, the level of industry met by the Revised Plan is
considered to represent the minimm required for German self-support
at a reasonable standard of living, and for a significant German
contribution to European recovery. Any sustantial dommard adjustment
would give rise to serious political reactions in Germany and the U.S.
Substantial upward adjustments would give rise to the charges
that the security concepts underly the Berlin Protcoel had been
completely abandoned; and that German recovery was to ba given an
absolute over that of other European countries. They would
further redupo the amount of reparation removals. Without a aharp
reduction in the standard of living eventually to be permitted to
Germany under t he Revised Plan, however, a s substantial upward adjustment
of that Plan would be required if a large program of current reparation
were
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 78b965f6368b103f
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 183567981
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "183567981",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567981",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, Annex 4 to Council of Foreign Ministers Report 3, Level of Industry",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567981",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-09-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-09-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-09-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 4,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "183567981",
"label": "Report, Annex 4 to Council of Foreign Ministers Report 3, Level of Industry",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567981"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "183567981",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567981",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, Annex 4 to Council of Foreign Ministers Report 3, Level of Industry",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567981",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-09-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-09-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-09-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 4,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567981",
"naId": 183567981,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"dateQualifier": "ca.",
"logicalDate": "1947-11-01",
"month": 11,
"year": 1947
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-09-02.jpg",
"mediaId": "78b965f6368b103f",
"ocrText": "S.\n2 e\nUS\nAt the Moason moeting of the on all four powers had agroed on\nthe noceasity for somo upward revision of the March, 1946, Plan.\nIn the tripartite talks in London, however, the Fronch were unable\nto concur in the Revised Plan for the Bisonal Area; and the throe\ndelegations agreed \"that the (Revised Plan) doss not projudy\nquadripartite decisions of the Counoil of Foreign Ministers in respect\nto the lovel of industry for Germany as a whole or such industrial\nlimitations as may be imposed by the peade settlement\". The Soviets,\nwhile denounoing the Revised Plan as a unilateral act, have not\nformulated their objections to it in any. concrete fashion.\nIn ganeral, the level of industry met by the Revised Plan is\nconsidered to represent the minimm required for German self-support\nat a reasonable standard of living, and for a significant German\ncontribution to European recovery. Any sustantial dommard adjustment\nwould give rise to serious political reactions in Germany and the U.S.\nSubstantial upward adjustments would give rise to the charges\nthat the security concepts underly the Berlin Protcoel had been\ncompletely abandoned; and that German recovery was to ba given an\nabsolute over that of other European countries. They would\nfurther redupo the amount of reparation removals. Without a aharp\nreduction in the standard of living eventually to be permitted to\nGermany under t he Revised Plan, however, a s substantial upward adjustment\nof that Plan would be required if a large program of current reparation\nwere"
}