Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
205716089
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2HUGH DE LACY
MEMBER:
FIRST DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
COMMITTEE ON NAVAL AFFAIRS
136 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
HOME ADDRESS:
Congress of
WHITE HOULD
315
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
H. RICHARD SELLER
SECRETARY
of
DEC31 10 58 AM
Washington, D. C.
ACCENCO
December 28, 1945
President Harry S. Truman
The White House
Washington, D. C.
ARCHIVES AND
Dear Mr. President:
:
I write with a disturbed mind, Mr. President, over
an Associated Press dispatch from Shanghai, indicating that
General Weydemeyer, if he is correctly quoted, is trying to
do to your own clearly stated policy the same violence
Hurleyldid to Roosevelt's.
"Plans," he is reported to have said, "plans are under
consideration to move additional [Chinese] Armies to Man-
churia. and more American Army troops would be needed to
accompany them, supervise debarkation, handle supply
problems and give other aid.
"This, he told a news conference, is in line with America's
ne wly broadened policy of aid to the national government of
Generalissimo Chiáng Kai -shek it would mean bringing
an additional 3,000 to 4,000 [American troops] from America
or from other military theaters. 11
The same story quotes him as saying that we would
have to transport more Chinese Nationalist Troops north and
says, "He [the General] already has informed his troops that
in view of what he termed the bro-Chiang policy of the
United States, they will not be go ing home as soon as they
had expected. He has cancelled two troopship sailings.
As I read your own statement and the objectives set
forth in the MOSCOW Declaration, which have both heartened
supporters of a united and democratic and forward moving
China, America's policy is not pro-Chiang or pro-Communist
or pro - -Democratic League. It strongly urges a representative
government of all Chine so groups. It even conditions
future loans and assistance upon the attainment of such
a representative government.
I can only believe that General Wedemeyer's stat ement
is meant to prejudice Marshall's work and keep your own
statement of policy from properly illuminating the path
Relations
belongs_to