Ask the Scholar
Page 39 of 50
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
POLITICAL APPENDIX
CONCLUSIONS
Political considerations do not favor a Soviet decision to overrun Western Europe
and the Near East prior to 1 January 1950.
This conclusion is based principally on the following considerations:
1.
Occupation of Western Europe and the Near East would vastly increase Soviet
security and administrative problems, and would create serious political instability
throughout the Soviet orbit in the event of war.
2.
The traditional Communist methods of subversion and infiltration, which are less
costly and involve less risk than military action, still offer substantial possibilities for
continued achievement of Soviet objectives.
egremo
,moltlaoggo
DISCUSSION
1. OUTLINE OF POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS INFLUENCING A SOVIET DECISION TO OVERRUN
WESTERN EUROPE AND THE NEAR EAST BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1950.
a.
Within the USSR.
Advantages.
(1) If it were possible to perpetuate the myth that the USSR was about to
be attacked, the war might have the effect of unifying the Soviet people behind their
government.
(2) The arrival of consumers' goods from Western Europe would serve to
placate to some extent dissatisfaction among the Soviet people with the war.
(3) Easy initial victories of Soviet troops would enhance national pride and
thus raise morale of the Soviet people.
Disadvantages.
(1) The resultant global conflict would place the entire Soviet system at
stake in a war to the finish at a time when the USSR is inferior to the West in potential
military power.
(2) Preparation for such an attack would serve to increase discontent among
the Soviet people since Soviet industrial production would have to be increasingly
diverted to military rather than consumer's purposes.
(3) The war would risk creating popular discontent within the USSR and
would strain an already war-weary people.
(4) The war would make the task of internal security control within the
USSR more difficult since the demand for trained security forces elsewhere in Europe
would be so great.
(5) The war would risk mass desertions from the Soviet Army and might
pave the way for anti-Soviet guerrilla action by Ukrainians and other Soviet peoples.
39
Page data
- Page
- 39
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 1a185d926aee836e
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 225249258
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "225249258",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/225249258",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Central Intelligence Agency, Office of Reports and Estimates Report, Appendices to ORE 58-48, The Strategic Value to the USSR of the Conquest of Western Europe and the Near East (To Cairo) Prior to 1950",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/225249258",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Intelligence Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875478/875478-05-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875478/875478-05-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875478/875478-05-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 50,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "225249258",
"label": "Central Intelligence Agency, Office of Reports and Estimates Report, Appendices to ORE 58-48, The Strategic Value to the USSR of the Conquest of Western Europe and the Near East (To Cairo) Prior to 1950",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/225249258"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "225249258",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/225249258",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Central Intelligence Agency, Office of Reports and Estimates Report, Appendices to ORE 58-48, The Strategic Value to the USSR of the Conquest of Western Europe and the Near East (To Cairo) Prior to 1950",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/225249258",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Intelligence Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875478/875478-05-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875478/875478-05-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875478/875478-05-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 50,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/225249258",
"naId": 225249258,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 27,
"logicalDate": "1948-10-27",
"month": 10,
"year": 1948
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 39,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875478/875478-05-39.jpg",
"mediaId": "1a185d926aee836e",
"ocrText": "POLITICAL APPENDIX\nCONCLUSIONS\nPolitical considerations do not favor a Soviet decision to overrun Western Europe\nand the Near East prior to 1 January 1950.\nThis conclusion is based principally on the following considerations:\n1.\nOccupation of Western Europe and the Near East would vastly increase Soviet\nsecurity and administrative problems, and would create serious political instability\nthroughout the Soviet orbit in the event of war.\n2.\nThe traditional Communist methods of subversion and infiltration, which are less\ncostly and involve less risk than military action, still offer substantial possibilities for\ncontinued achievement of Soviet objectives.\negremo\n,moltlaoggo\nDISCUSSION\n1. OUTLINE OF POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS INFLUENCING A SOVIET DECISION TO OVERRUN\nWESTERN EUROPE AND THE NEAR EAST BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1950.\na.\nWithin the USSR.\nAdvantages.\n(1) If it were possible to perpetuate the myth that the USSR was about to\nbe attacked, the war might have the effect of unifying the Soviet people behind their\ngovernment.\n(2) The arrival of consumers' goods from Western Europe would serve to\nplacate to some extent dissatisfaction among the Soviet people with the war.\n(3) Easy initial victories of Soviet troops would enhance national pride and\nthus raise morale of the Soviet people.\nDisadvantages.\n(1) The resultant global conflict would place the entire Soviet system at\nstake in a war to the finish at a time when the USSR is inferior to the West in potential\nmilitary power.\n(2) Preparation for such an attack would serve to increase discontent among\nthe Soviet people since Soviet industrial production would have to be increasingly\ndiverted to military rather than consumer's purposes.\n(3) The war would risk creating popular discontent within the USSR and\nwould strain an already war-weary people.\n(4) The war would make the task of internal security control within the\nUSSR more difficult since the demand for trained security forces elsewhere in Europe\nwould be so great.\n(5) The war would risk mass desertions from the Soviet Army and might\npave the way for anti-Soviet guerrilla action by Ukrainians and other Soviet peoples.\n39"
}