Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 7
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
-2- #291, April 13, 1 p.m., from Jerusalem
was that Commission should strive to achieve plan
acceptable to partites concerned, namely Israel,
Trenajordan, (or other ad ljacent state) and UN. If
Committee were to proceed without reference to states
immediately concerned, product of its work would
probably be unacceptable and would not contribute to
solution of problem. He considered it possible to
achieve plan which would be acceptable to all concerned.
He was convinced that UN would accept plan containing
more limited form of internationalization than might
have been contemplated when resolution was adopted
lest December, provided plan were acceptable to parties
concerned. Ben-Gurion, basis of his own extensive
experience with UN here is convinced that GA would not
only accept such plan, but would be extremely pleased
to achieve settlement of problem.
Comay advised "month of masterly inactivity" while
Transjordan and Israel try to work out through special
committee agreement on Jerusalem. He thought there
would be no difficulty about Jewish-Arab lines in
Jerusalem since Israel would be willing to compensate
for Arab expropriated property inside city. What
Israel had proposed to Transjordan, in informal talks
that seem to be going on nows is division of city into
three zones: Jewish, Arab and international (old City).
Deyan told me later that Transjordan had shown reluctance
to discuss any matters other than these strictly within
armistice terms although Trans jordan had previously
evidenced willingness to effect opening of Bethlehem
and Scopus roads and to deal with other technical
matters preliminary to any peace settlement.
COMMENT: Ben-Gurion's strong reaction in which he
virtually announced that Jerusalem would be capital
of Israel did in fact create strong reaction in
Commission. As reported previously, French and Turkish
delegates refused to allow their members of Jerusalem
Committee to meet formally with Comay for further
explanations of Israeli position. For USDEL I said
that whether other members met or not I would instruct
Halderman
DECLASSIFIED
E. O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and 5(D) or (E)
Dept. of State letter, 13.55
By NLT- HC , NARS Date 527.75
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 3bc3fb191b499dcf
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 269702291
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "269702291",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702291",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Telegram from William C. Burdett, Jr. to Secretary of State Dean Acheson",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702291",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750310/750310-18-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750310/750310-18-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750310/750310-18-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 7,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "269702291",
"label": "Telegram from William C. Burdett, Jr. to Secretary of State Dean Acheson",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702291"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "269702291",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702291",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Telegram from William C. Burdett, Jr. to Secretary of State Dean Acheson",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702291",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750310/750310-18-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750310/750310-18-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750310/750310-18-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 7,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702291",
"naId": 269702291,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 13,
"logicalDate": "1949-04-13",
"month": 4,
"year": 1949
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750310/750310-18-002.jpg",
"mediaId": "3bc3fb191b499dcf",
"ocrText": "-2- #291, April 13, 1 p.m., from Jerusalem\nwas that Commission should strive to achieve plan\nacceptable to partites concerned, namely Israel,\nTrenajordan, (or other ad ljacent state) and UN. If\nCommittee were to proceed without reference to states\nimmediately concerned, product of its work would\nprobably be unacceptable and would not contribute to\nsolution of problem. He considered it possible to\nachieve plan which would be acceptable to all concerned.\nHe was convinced that UN would accept plan containing\nmore limited form of internationalization than might\nhave been contemplated when resolution was adopted\nlest December, provided plan were acceptable to parties\nconcerned. Ben-Gurion, basis of his own extensive\nexperience with UN here is convinced that GA would not\nonly accept such plan, but would be extremely pleased\nto achieve settlement of problem.\nComay advised \"month of masterly inactivity\" while\nTransjordan and Israel try to work out through special\ncommittee agreement on Jerusalem. He thought there\nwould be no difficulty about Jewish-Arab lines in\nJerusalem since Israel would be willing to compensate\nfor Arab expropriated property inside city. What\nIsrael had proposed to Transjordan, in informal talks\nthat seem to be going on nows is division of city into\nthree zones: Jewish, Arab and international (old City).\nDeyan told me later that Transjordan had shown reluctance\nto discuss any matters other than these strictly within\narmistice terms although Trans jordan had previously\nevidenced willingness to effect opening of Bethlehem\nand Scopus roads and to deal with other technical\nmatters preliminary to any peace settlement.\nCOMMENT: Ben-Gurion's strong reaction in which he\nvirtually announced that Jerusalem would be capital\nof Israel did in fact create strong reaction in\nCommission. As reported previously, French and Turkish\ndelegates refused to allow their members of Jerusalem\nCommittee to meet formally with Comay for further\nexplanations of Israeli position. For USDEL I said\nthat whether other members met or not I would instruct\nHalderman\nDECLASSIFIED\nE. O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and 5(D) or (E)\nDept. of State letter, 13.55\nBy NLT- HC , NARS Date 527.75"
}