Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 2
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

RESTRICTED INTRODUCTION: Little that is new has been added either to Soviet or to non-Soviet comment on the atomic bomb. The post-announcement themes have now been worked into the fabric of Soviet propaganda, however, so that they appear in any of the other contexts in which peace is discussed. "BLACKMAIL": Perhaps the commonest type of Soviet reference to the bomb continues to be the assertion that the West can no longer hope to "blackmail" the democratic countries by "intimidating" them with the bomb. For example, in a description of the celebration of International Peace Day in the USSR, the Soviet poet Leonidze is quoted as saying: "We are being intimidated by the atom bomb, but we have had it for a long time." RETALIATION: The retaliation theme, dramatically introduced on 2 October by Ehrenburg, also reappears. The Georgian scientist Muskhelishvili is said to have declared: "We do not intend to use atomic energy for military purposes, but woe to those who will be the first to try to do this.' BAN THE BOMB: In the U.N. context there is still no specific dis- cussion of the concrete points at issue, but only a stereotyped repetition of the plea to prohibit the bomb, with a continued insistence that it is the USSR that wants "strict international control." For instance, Marinin says: "The second Soviet proposal calls upon the General Assembly to declare the use of the atomic weapon and other means of mass destruction to be in direct contradiction to the conscience and honor of nations, and incompatible with membership in the U.N. organization. It is common knowledge that the Soviet Union has long been in possession of the atomic weapon, but ever since 1946 it has been consistently striving to have the atomic weapon banned and to establish strict international control to enforce this ban. (in English to the United Kingdom, 3 October) RESTRICTED DECLASSIFIED Authority E.O. 1050

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
6b765ff49b03b99d
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
470155306
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "470155306",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155306",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to the President's Statement About an Atomic Explosion in the USSR",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155306",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Intelligence Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875442/875442-04-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875442/875442-04-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875442/875442-04-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 2,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "470155306",
    "label": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to the President's Statement About an Atomic Explosion in the USSR",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155306"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "470155306",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155306",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to the President's Statement About an Atomic Explosion in the USSR",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155306",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Intelligence Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875442/875442-04-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875442/875442-04-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875442/875442-04-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 2,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155306",
    "naId": 470155306,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 4,
            "logicalDate": "1949-10-04",
            "month": 10,
            "year": 1949
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875442/875442-04-002.tif",
    "mediaId": "6b765ff49b03b99d",
    "ocrText": "RESTRICTED\nINTRODUCTION: Little that is new has been added either to Soviet or to\nnon-Soviet comment on the atomic bomb. The post-announcement themes have\nnow been worked into the fabric of Soviet propaganda, however, so that\nthey appear in any of the other contexts in which peace is discussed.\n\"BLACKMAIL\": Perhaps the commonest type of Soviet reference to the\nbomb continues to be the assertion that the West can no longer hope to\n\"blackmail\" the democratic countries by \"intimidating\" them with the\nbomb. For example, in a description of the celebration of International\nPeace Day in the USSR, the Soviet poet Leonidze is quoted as saying: \"We\nare being intimidated by the atom bomb, but we have had it for a long\ntime.\"\nRETALIATION: The retaliation theme, dramatically introduced on\n2 October by Ehrenburg, also reappears. The Georgian scientist\nMuskhelishvili is said to have declared: \"We do not intend to use\natomic energy for military purposes, but woe to those who will be the\nfirst to try to do this.'\nBAN THE BOMB: In the U.N. context there is still no specific dis-\ncussion of the concrete points at issue, but only a stereotyped repetition\nof the plea to prohibit the bomb, with a continued insistence that it is\nthe USSR that wants \"strict international control.\" For instance,\nMarinin says:\n\"The second Soviet proposal calls upon the General Assembly to\ndeclare the use of the atomic weapon and other means of mass\ndestruction to be in direct contradiction to the conscience and\nhonor of nations, and incompatible with membership in the U.N.\norganization. It is common knowledge that the Soviet Union has\nlong been in possession of the atomic weapon, but ever since\n1946 it has been consistently striving to have the atomic weapon\nbanned and to establish strict international control to enforce\nthis ban. (in English to the United Kingdom, 3 October)\nRESTRICTED\nDECLASSIFIED\nAuthority E.O. 1050"
}