Ask the Scholar

Page 3 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 3

OCR

RESTRICTED Beyond a brief, stereotyped Berlin reference to Soviet peace-mindedness, there is no Communist comment on Jacob Malik's 23 June proposal for termi- nation of the Korean War. The address is widely reported by the Soviet radio and press and is noted by Peiping in a Korean-language broadcast of 25 June but as yet there is no discussion of the offer or its implications. Western sources, on the other hand, react promptly and volubly. They are markedly skeptical of the motives behind the offer but generally agree that the "peace bomb" must be given serious consideration. The exceptions to this generalization are spokesmen of Nationalist China and the Republic of Korea and the Manila radio who characterize the offer as a cynical attempt to gain time for the Communist forces. CLOSING OF THE GAP BETWEEN EAST AND WEST: Newspapers in London, Paris and Rome are quoted as receiving the Malik proposal with hope colored with open skepticism; they note that Delegate Malik has come closer than ever before to accepting the terms offered by Secretary Acheson and insist that the offer must be taken seriously even though it should turn out to be nothing more than a propaganda device intended to obstruct Western unity and rearmament. There are frequent calls for real proof of peaceful intentions from Moscow and Peiping and warnings against any final solution that abandons the principles for which the United Nations under- took action in Korea. Manila, Madrid, Taipei, and Tokyo are critical of Delegate Malik's proposal, suggesting that it was an attempt to divert attention from the collapse of the Paris negotiations and a device to secure time for Communist forces. Madrid is particularly concerned with Malik's failure to name the United Nations as one of the negotiators and Manila points out that an armistice should take place without any retreat by the victors. RESTRICTED

Page data

Page
3
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
2dc9245bd788bd22
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
470155639
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "470155639",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155639",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to Jacob Malik's 23 June Radio Address",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155639",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Intelligence Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875450/875450-01-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875450/875450-01-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875450/875450-01-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "470155639",
    "label": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to Jacob Malik's 23 June Radio Address",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155639"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "470155639",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155639",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to Jacob Malik's 23 June Radio Address",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155639",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Intelligence Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875450/875450-01-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875450/875450-01-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875450/875450-01-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155639",
    "naId": 470155639,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 25,
            "logicalDate": "1951-06-25",
            "month": 6,
            "year": 1951
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 3,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875450/875450-01-003.tif",
    "mediaId": "2dc9245bd788bd22",
    "ocrText": "RESTRICTED\nBeyond a brief, stereotyped Berlin reference to Soviet peace-mindedness,\nthere is no Communist comment on Jacob Malik's 23 June proposal for termi-\nnation of the Korean War. The address is widely reported by the Soviet\nradio and press and is noted by Peiping in a Korean-language broadcast of\n25 June but as yet there is no discussion of the offer or its implications.\nWestern sources, on the other hand, react promptly and volubly. They are\nmarkedly skeptical of the motives behind the offer but generally agree\nthat the \"peace bomb\" must be given serious consideration. The exceptions\nto this generalization are spokesmen of Nationalist China and the Republic\nof Korea and the Manila radio who characterize the offer as a cynical\nattempt to gain time for the Communist forces.\nCLOSING OF THE GAP BETWEEN EAST AND WEST: Newspapers in London,\nParis and Rome are quoted as receiving the Malik proposal with hope colored\nwith open skepticism; they note that Delegate Malik has come closer than\never before to accepting the terms offered by Secretary Acheson and\ninsist that the offer must be taken seriously even though it should turn\nout to be nothing more than a propaganda device intended to obstruct\nWestern unity and rearmament. There are frequent calls for real proof of\npeaceful intentions from Moscow and Peiping and warnings against any final\nsolution that abandons the principles for which the United Nations under-\ntook action in Korea.\nManila, Madrid, Taipei, and Tokyo are critical of Delegate Malik's\nproposal, suggesting that it was an attempt to divert attention from the\ncollapse of the Paris negotiations and a device to secure time for\nCommunist forces. Madrid is particularly concerned with Malik's failure\nto name the United Nations as one of the negotiators and Manila points out\nthat an armistice should take place without any retreat by the victors.\nRESTRICTED"
}