Ask the Scholar

Page 521 of 709
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 521

OCR

SECRET A.A. G-76 27-0 DOCUMENT AA (Continued) would be to move to rescind or repeal the resolution of September 11, but he did not make that motion. If such /a motion were made even now, it would be for the Council tq act on the motion, and the records show what occurred. All that I am saying is that the protocol ought to show just what occurred, and if it did, there could be no reason for objection by anybody, because everybody knows the position taken by the Soviet representative now. I thought he would move to cancel or reneal it or in some way have the records show it, other than by a mere statement. MOLOTOV That is what I want to say--that an error has been made and should be corrected, and the decision revoked. Otherwise, we shall not sign any protocol, Or else the incorrect item should be ex- cluded, and no spécial decision would be required. Or else the decision adopted on September 11 should be deleted, and in this case no spécial decision revoking it would be required. I will not suggest that we exclude anything from the protocol, but unless the mistake has been but right, the Soviet Delegation will sign no protocol. No one can compel the Soviet Delegation to sign what the Soviet Delega- tion does not agree to, and says BO openly. That ought to be clear. Todasto: BYRNES: Mr. Chairman, when a council adopts a resolution, acts upon it for sixteen meetings, it can- not be excluded from the record, but that does not preclude the records showing exactly what occurred da and the record should show, at some place, that on September 22 the Soviet representative informed the Council that he had made a mist?ke in agreeing to the resolution of September 11, and that the assent of the Soviet Delegtation to that decision was withdrawn. If he wants a statement of that kind, that is the fact. MOLOTOV: This is exactly what the Soviet Delega- tion stated on September 22, and the Soviet Delegation has never renounced that statement and continues to hold--to maintain that view. That is why, this is the reason for which we shall not sign any protocol unless the decision has been revoked. BEVIN: Mr. Chairman, would: it not be better to say that in the protocol, and make it quite clear, SECRET

Page data

Page
521
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
12921fa587b8655e
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
750274
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "750274",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750274",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: Far Eastern Conference Discussions:  November, 1949",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750274",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750274/750274-01-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750274/750274-01-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750274/750274-01-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 709,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "750274",
    "label": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: Far Eastern Conference Discussions:  November, 1949",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750274"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "750274",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750274",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: Far Eastern Conference Discussions:  November, 1949",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750274",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750274/750274-01-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750274/750274-01-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750274/750274-01-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 709,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750274",
    "naId": 750274,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 521,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750274/750274-01-521.jpg",
    "mediaId": "12921fa587b8655e",
    "ocrText": "SECRET\nA.A.\nG-76\n27-0\nDOCUMENT AA\n(Continued)\nwould be to move to rescind or repeal the resolution\nof September 11, but he did not make that motion.\nIf such /a motion were made even now, it would be for\nthe Council tq act on the motion, and the records\nshow what occurred. All that I am saying is that\nthe protocol ought to show just what occurred, and\nif it did, there could be no reason for objection by\nanybody, because everybody knows the position taken\nby the Soviet representative now. I thought he would\nmove to cancel or reneal it or in some way have the\nrecords show it, other than by a mere statement.\nMOLOTOV That is what I want to say--that an\nerror has been made and should be corrected, and the\ndecision revoked. Otherwise, we shall not sign any\nprotocol, Or else the incorrect item should be ex-\ncluded, and no spécial decision would be required.\nOr else the decision adopted on September 11 should\nbe deleted, and in this case no spécial decision\nrevoking it would be required. I will not suggest\nthat we exclude anything from the protocol, but\nunless the mistake has been but right, the Soviet\nDelegation will sign no protocol. No one can compel\nthe Soviet Delegation to sign what the Soviet Delega-\ntion does not agree to, and says BO openly. That\nought to be clear.\nTodasto:\nBYRNES: Mr. Chairman, when a council adopts a\nresolution, acts upon it for sixteen meetings, it can-\nnot be excluded from the record, but that does not\npreclude the records showing exactly what occurred\nda\nand the record should show, at some place, that on\nSeptember 22 the Soviet representative informed the\nCouncil that he had made a mist?ke in agreeing to the\nresolution of September 11, and that the assent of\nthe Soviet Delegtation to that decision was withdrawn.\nIf he wants a statement of that kind, that is the fact.\nMOLOTOV: This is exactly what the Soviet Delega-\ntion stated on September 22, and the Soviet Delegation\nhas never renounced that statement and continues to\nhold--to maintain that view. That is why, this is the\nreason for which we shall not sign any protocol unless\nthe decision has been revoked.\nBEVIN: Mr. Chairman, would: it not be better to\nsay that in the protocol, and make it quite clear,\nSECRET"
}