Ask the Scholar

Page 6 of 159
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 6

OCR

There he is; Oswald, the loner! The, insignificant being shown perferential treatment from the very highest places prior to the assassination. There he is, Oswald, the loner who defected with an F.B.I. informant number and a firuge for a salary of $200.00 from that same agency. (V H 242) On January 22, 1964, Rankin was informed by Waggoner Carr, the Attorney General of Texas, that Oswald had been a paid F.B.I. informer. (V P 242) The Warren Commission undertook no independent investigation, no meaningful action to determine the veracity of this report. Is there no action, because they knew it was true? If Oswald was just a lonely nobody, why is it there are fifty-one documents classified to secret in the National Archives relating to Oswald and Ruby if both of these men are so unimportant? Why should there be action on the part of our government to suppress infromation about nobodies- unless they are really somebodies? Why is it George De Morhenschildt should have any reaction at all to Oswald? If all things were normal, as they are supposed to have been on the surface, there would be no two people less liley to have any kind of relationship than De Mohrenschildt and Oswald. Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Commission Counsel, describes De Mohrenschildt for us as follows: you are a man of very superior education and extremly wide :experience and acquaintance here and in Europe, South America, West Indies- you have lived an extremely colorful life De Mohrenschildt simply replies: "Yes. (IX H 236) On the next page of the testimony De Mohrenschildt describes Oswald: II never would believe that any `government would be stupid: enough' to trust Lee with anything important. Jenner asked: "Give me the basis of your opinion. De Mohrenschildb

Page data

Page
6
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
e7701c3632833ed4
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
7564795
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "7564795",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Conspiracy to Kill JFK-- Its Meaning",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "collections": [
        "John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection",
        "Papers of Jim Garrison"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "imageCount": 159,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "7564795",
    "label": "Conspiracy to Kill JFK-- Its Meaning",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "7564795",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Conspiracy to Kill JFK-- Its Meaning",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "collections": [
        "John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection",
        "Papers of Jim Garrison"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "imageCount": 159,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "naId": 7564795,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 6,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0042.jpg",
    "mediaId": "e7701c3632833ed4",
    "ocrText": "There he is; Oswald, the loner! The, insignificant being\nshown perferential treatment from the very highest places prior\nto the assassination. There he is, Oswald, the loner who defected\nwith an F.B.I. informant number and a firuge for a salary of\n$200.00 from that same agency. (V H 242) On January 22, 1964, Rankin\nwas informed by Waggoner Carr, the Attorney General of Texas, that\nOswald had been a paid F.B.I. informer. (V P 242) The Warren\nCommission undertook no independent investigation, no meaningful\naction to determine the veracity of this report. Is there no action,\nbecause they knew it was true? If Oswald was just a lonely nobody,\nwhy is it there are fifty-one documents classified to secret in\nthe National Archives relating to Oswald and Ruby if both of these\nmen are so unimportant? Why should there be action on the\npart\nof our government to suppress infromation about nobodies- unless\nthey are really somebodies?\nWhy is it George De Morhenschildt should have any reaction\nat all to Oswald? If all things were normal, as they are supposed\nto have been on the surface, there would be no two people less\nliley to have any kind of relationship than De Mohrenschildt\nand Oswald. Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Commission Counsel, describes\nDe Mohrenschildt for us as follows:\nyou are a man of very superior education\nand extremly wide :experience and acquaintance\nhere and in Europe, South America, West Indies-\nyou have lived an extremely colorful life\nDe Mohrenschildt simply replies:\n\"Yes. (IX H 236)\nOn the next page of the testimony De Mohrenschildt describes\nOswald:\nII never would believe that any `government\nwould be stupid: enough' to trust Lee with\nanything important.\nJenner asked:\n\"Give me the basis of your opinion.\nDe Mohrenschildb"
}