Ask the Scholar

Page 86 of 159
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 86

OCR

The main witness against Oswald, Brennan, was unable to identify him in a line up, and Oswald did not confess to having committed any crimes. Rather, he said he was framed. That doesn't mean he was, but it was a charge nonetheless that could well have been considered. The government was obligated to consider the hypothesis of a frame, because the Secret Service had been given a tape by the Intelligence Division of the Miami Police Department several days after November 9, 1963 which tape described an actual plot uncovered in Miami to kill President Kennedy. The informant described how a patsy would be provided to throw the public off the real trail of the conspirators. But, the 1 authorities ignored this Miami revelation in interpreting Oswald's possible role in the assassination. They ignored it although the bullet designated Commission Exhibit 399 tipped itself off as a plant flying into the case as it did without benefit of blood, tissue, weight loss or deformation. Again we see the pattern. There was prejudicial action taken against Oswald after the assassination. This official action wasn't justified by the very data authorities were them- selves presenting as evidence. Before the assassination, when there was a justification for action against Oswald, none was taken. This pattern is only consistent with a frame-up, and -44- 1. Jones, Jr., Penn, Loc. Cit. , p. 47. 44

Page data

Page
86
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
2c33f1847f7eb0e8
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
7564795
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "7564795",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Conspiracy to Kill JFK-- Its Meaning",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "collections": [
        "John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection",
        "Papers of Jim Garrison"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "imageCount": 159,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "7564795",
    "label": "Conspiracy to Kill JFK-- Its Meaning",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "7564795",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Conspiracy to Kill JFK-- Its Meaning",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "collections": [
        "John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection",
        "Papers of Jim Garrison"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "imageCount": 159,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "naId": 7564795,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 86,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0045.jpg",
    "mediaId": "2c33f1847f7eb0e8",
    "ocrText": "The main witness against Oswald, Brennan, was unable to identify\nhim in a line up, and Oswald did not confess to having committed\nany crimes. Rather, he said he was framed. That doesn't mean\nhe was, but it was a charge nonetheless that could well have\nbeen considered. The government was obligated to consider the\nhypothesis of a frame, because the Secret Service had been given\na tape by the Intelligence Division of the Miami Police Department\nseveral days after November 9, 1963 which tape described an\nactual plot uncovered in Miami to kill President Kennedy. The\ninformant described how a patsy would be provided to throw the\npublic off the real trail of the conspirators. But, the\n1\nauthorities ignored this Miami revelation in interpreting\nOswald's possible role in the assassination. They ignored\nit although the bullet designated Commission Exhibit 399\ntipped itself off as a plant flying into the case as it did\nwithout benefit of blood, tissue, weight loss or deformation.\nAgain we see the pattern. There was prejudicial action\ntaken against Oswald after the assassination. This official\naction wasn't justified by the very data authorities were them-\nselves presenting as evidence. Before the assassination, when\nthere was a justification for action against Oswald, none was\ntaken. This pattern is only consistent with a frame-up, and\n-44-\n1. Jones, Jr., Penn, Loc. Cit. , p. 47.\n44"
}