Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
290085264
label
NEPAL Vol. I [March 1969-July 1974] [1 of 2]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
290085264
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
075c9bd3dbab0880
ocrText
DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD [NIXON PROJECT] DOCUMENT DOCUMENT NUMBER TYPE SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION 2a report Biography N/D A DECLASSIFIED PER RAC REVIEW 9/5/2008 4 memo Laise to the President 8/28/72 a 8 memo Kissinger to the President 1/24/20 B 17a report Biography N/D A DECLASSIFIED por RAC REVIEW 9/24/2008 18a report Biography NID B FOR RAC REVIOW SANITIZED 9/24/2008 19 telegram Kathmandu to Secstate 8/1/74 B POR RAC REVIEW SANITIZED 8/28/2008 21 telegram Kathmandu to secotate Por PAC REVIOW 7/6/24 w SANITIZED 8/28/2008 22 telegram Kathmandu to Secslate 7/3/74 B SANITIZED Paz RAC REVIEW 8/28/2008 28 telegram Kathmandu to Secstate 11/2/73 3 SANITIZED pon RAC REVIEW 8/28/2008 30 telegram Kathmandu to Securate 7/31/73 B pon BAC REVIEW SANITIZED 1/27/2009 31 telegram Kathmandu to Sastate 7/31/73 B 33 telegram Kathmandu to Secstate 7/5/72 B FILE GROUP TITLE BOX NUMBER NSC 623 FOLDER TITLE 1 RESTRICTION CODES A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual's F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMDNSTRSSIFUED pursuant to NA 14021 (4-85) DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD [NIXON PROJECT] DOCUMENT DOCUMENT NUMBER TYPE SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION 51 telegram Secstate to Kathmandu 8/15/73 B SANITIZED PER RAC REVIEW 8/28/2008 69 report Intelligence Information Report 11/22/71 B FILE GROUP TITLE BOX NUMBER NSC 623 FOLDER TITLE \ RESTRICTION CODES A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual's F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADNDECSARSIFIED pursuant to review 3-35200024 NA 14021 (4-85) 6837 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 28, 1972 Dear Carol: Just a word to thank you for your letter following our talk in Honolulu about your post-Nepal prefer- ences. I fully appreciate your instincts and trust that something mutually satisfying to both you and Ellsworth can be worked out. In the interim, we will have your thoughts in mind. It was, as always, a pleasure to see both of you again, Warm regards, Henry A. Kissinger The Honorable Carol C. Laise American Ambassador Kathmandu Dispatched 10/28/72 BTM by STATE Poneti DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 fg MEMORANDUM NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL Holder CONFIDENTIAL October 12, 1972 MEMORANDUM FOR: DR.KISSINGER THROUGH: JEANNE DAVIS FROM: HAROLDH. SAUNDERS Hal SUBJECT: Letter from Ambassador Carol Laise I understand that you have noted the attached letter from Carol Laise (Tab B) following your chat with her in Honolulu about her career preferences after Nepal. You will recall that, among other things suggested for the still vacant ambassadorial posts in Pakistan and India was the possibility of moving Carol Laise from Kathmandu to Delhi. I don't know your thoughts on this or whether you raised the prospect in Hono- lulu, but several thoughts emerge in this letter that would seem to rule this out. Carol says she has ruled out a line job, would like a Washington assignment, and, in any event, seems to contemplate some time in Washington before any new assignment. On the other hand, I have no idea whether she and Ambassador Bunker have ever thought of a post in New Delhi together in the near future, or whether you, Laise and Bunker have discussed other possibilities. Other than registering her preferences with you, this letter would seem to require no immediate action re assignment prospects. However, you may wish to thank her for the letter and she indicates she may be in fur- ther correspondence with you on this subject. Recommendations: 1. That you sign the letter to Ambassador Laise at Tab A. 2. That Jeanne Davis send a copy of the Laise letter and reply to Mr. Flanigan . CONFIDENTIAL Mahe sure that Mr. Bunker postion Director peribin is given Serior Summir DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL September 18 TO HAL SAUNDERS At least HA K is taking an interest! I suppose this doesn't really need a reply, but [ think a brief acknowledgeme: nt would be nice. If you agree, could we have a draft, please. JeaRAM Davis DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 6831 Kathmandu, Nepal September 5, 1972 PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL Dear Henry: This is just to say thank you for your kindness and con- sideration in endorsing my trip to Honolulu with Ellsworth and giving me some of your time while I was there. The solitude of the Himalayas is good for the soul no doubt, but it leaves something to be desired in matters of the mind and heart. I appreciate your concern and interest about "After Nepal, What? " but I wonder, in retrospect, whether I was able to make myself entirely clear. To avoid any confusion, per- haps, I should jot down what I had in mind, if you can bear with some repetition. My desire is to have a life together with Ellsworth and if possible to continue to serve in the Foreign Service wherever it is felt I can be useful. Past experience suggests that I can- not do justice to either Ellsworth or the Service in the kind of line job which would interest me. Therefore, a staff position where one isn't under the gun of crises and deadlines seems indicated. One such position which interested me and which was offered to me earlier this year is Coordinator of the Senior Seminar. When I had to pass this up, circumstances conspired to bring one our ablest Career Ministers into the job - Sam Berger. The appointment is normally for a minimum of two years. Thus, until Sam completes the term or moves on to something bigger, the job is not open for consideration as far The Honorable Henry A. Kissinger The White House Washington, D. C. PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL 2 I am concerned. If an important assignment for Sam creates a vacancy, I should be happy to be considered again; other- wise I would want to explore other openings of interest, though at the moment I cannot be specific as to my preferences. With your interest and the Department's assurances that they will do their best to accommodate my wishes, I think things are in good hands and do not worry, but I will, if I may, continue to be in touch. In any case there seems to be plenty of time as Ellsworth and I will want to have a good leave and a chance to establish our- selves in Washington before taking on a new assignment. In the meantime, I'll be hoping - in the sailors' vernacular - that the wind will be at your back and the sailing smooth in the months ahead. Gratefully yours, Came Carol C. Laise Ambassador PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 DOC RECD LOG NBR MO DA MO DA HR NSC CORRESPONDENCE PROFILE 9 9 6837 LOG IN/OUT ONLY INITIAL YOUD ACTION OFF TO: PRES FROM: ELIOT U KISSINGER X NO FORN NODIS ROGERS, W LOU BUO EXDIS DOC SOURCE/CLASS/DESCRIPTION HAIG LAIRD, M 6 X EYES ONLY LIMDIS LAISE, Carol 'S CODE WORD RES DATA Thoughts Aban & Future assignment Hussibelitin SUBJECT: Thanks for Considertisis AT TS Hanrin SENSITIVE and Confirms REFERENCE: S/S OTHER NOT XEROXED APP'TS: PRES HAK TALKER MEMCON DATE REQ. INTERNAL ROUTING AND DISTRIBUTION ACTION REQUIRED ACTION INFO REC MEMO FOR HAK ( ) CY ADVANCE CYS TO HAK/HAIG FOR MEMO FOR PRES. ( ) STAFF SECRETARY REPLY FOR SIGNATURE ( ) FAR EAST FOR DISTRIBUTION/DISPATCH ( ) SECRETARIAT DISTRIBUTION/ACTION SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA MEMO TO ( ) NR EAST/NORTH AFRICA RECOMMENDATIONS ( ) EUROPE/CANADA JOINT MEMO ( ) LATIN AMERICA REFER TO STATE ( ) UNITED NATIONS ANY ACTION NECESSARY ( ) ECONOMIC CONCURRENCE DUE DATE: LR PLANNING COMMENTS: (Including Special 9/28 Instructions) ( ) SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM ANALYSIS NSC PLANNING nated b NCHP + CONGRESSIONAL DATE FROM TO S Daude 10/12/72 Saunders HAK X the ACTION the REQUIRED to Lase Deason (10/17) CY TO INTERNAL/INTERIM ROUTING 10/28 th to Larei 10/28 DAVIS S Further Action Are HAR Rote 10/31 Sanda 9/10/73 mo bsels C Haudled orally with Latr file MICROFILM DATA CROSS REF WITH NOTIFY DATE SEE LOG DISPATCH: LETTER MEMO Done Bym 10/28/72 DO you INIT DISPOSITION JOINED BY LOG COPIES: (AS MARKED ABOVE) SEP 21973 DATE SPECIAL FILE RQMT: SA, HP, HM ORIG) NSC SPECIAL DISPOSITION COMMENTS: by STATE ponct TO ) PAF WHC SUSPENSE CY ATTACHED: YES NO SUBF * GPO: 1972-455-927 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 133 133 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON January 16, 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE The President concurs with your opinion and has requested that you inform the Government of Nepal that the appointment of Yadu Nath Khanal as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Government of Nepal would be agreeable to the Government of the United States. to A. Henry A. Kissinger DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 MEMORANDUM NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL ACTION 133 CONFIDENTIAL (GDS) January 12, 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR: MRS. JEANNE W. DAVIS FROM: HAROLD H. SAUNDERS Hal SUBJECT: New Nepalese Ambassador I see no reason for not going ahead with the attached Agrement. Carol Laise has known this gentleman very well and commends him highly. Although he is not one of the younger group around the new young King, he is an elder statesman of such repute that Carol thinks he will have the respect of the governing group in Katmandu. Having spent a year in Harvard, he knows the US reasonably well and should be an effective interpreter of US policy to his government. CONFIDENTIAL(GDS) DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 133 7300275 THE SECRETARY OF STATE WASHINGTON January 8, 1973 CONFIDENTIAL Dear Mr. President: The Government of Nepal has inquired whether our Government agrees to the appointment of Yadu Nath Khanal as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Nepal to the United States. A biography of Ambassador Khanal is enclosed. A thorough review of United States Government records reveals no grounds for objection. I believe this appointment would be satisfactory. If you concur, I shall be pleased to inform the Government of Nepal. Respectfully, William P. Rogers Enclosure: Biography. The President, The White House. GDS--DECLAS Dec. 31, 1979 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL BIOGRAPHY - Yadu Nath Khanal Nepal Yadu Nath Khanal, a well respected professor and most able civil servant, has been selected by King Birendra as Nepal's new Ambassador to the United States. Khanal, a Hindu of the Brahmin caste, was born in Western Nepal on August 13, 1913. He completed his basic education in Nepal and then went to Calcutta University where he received an M.A. in English literature in 1941. He also studied in London (1950) and at the University of Oregon under a U.S. AID grant (1954). In 1971, Professor Khanal was an international fellow at the Harvard Center for International Affairs. Ambassador Khanal began his political career as principal private secretary to Prime Minister T. P. Acharya in 1955 and later served as a member of the National Planning Council. His most significant contribution to Nepal, however, is in his capacity as the foremost interpreter of Nepalese foreign policy. As Foreign Secretary in 1961-63 and 1967-70 and as Ambassador to India and Pakistan from 1963-67, Khanal helped implement a policy designed to balance Nepal between its two large neighbors while increasing the world's interest in the preservation of Nepalese sovereignty. Ambassador Khanal has traveled widely: in 1955 he was secretary to the Nepalese delegation to the Bandung Conference; in 1958, 1960 and 1967 he served as a member of the Nepalese delegation to the UN General Assembly; he attended the Non- aligned Conferences in Belgrade (1961) and Cairo (1964); he accompanied the late King on official visits to Yugoslavia (1961), Pakistan (1961), China (1961), India (1963; 1965), the United Arab Republic (1964), the United States (1967) and Japan (1970). Khana1 has written several articles on foreign policy. His other interests include reading, badminton, and contract bridge. He is married and has two daughters and a son. He speaks English flawlessly. A thorough search of United States Government sources reveals no grounds for objection. DECLASSIFIED E.O. 13526, Section 3.5 CONFIDENTIAL PER (CAC REVIEW 9/15/2008 By 415 NARA, Date 4/26/2012 [p. of DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 DOC RECD LOG NBR 12 INITIAL ACTION OFF MO DA MO DA HR NSC CORRESPONDENCE PROPILE 108 1099 733 LOG IN/OUT Holding ONLY TO: PRES X FROM: ELIOT U NO FORN NODIS KISSINGER ROGERS, W x LOU BUO EXDIS DOC SOURCE/CLASS/DESCRIPTION HAIG LAIRD, M C X EYES ONLY LIMDIS S CODE WORD RES DATA TS SENSITIVE SUBJECT: agrement of nepal's yadu nath Khanal as amble to US REFERENCE: S/S 7300275 OTHER NOT XEROXED APP'TS: PRES HAK TALKER MEMCON DATE REQ. INTERNAL ROUTING AND DISTRIBUTION ACTION REQUIRED ACTION INFO REC MEMO FOR HAK ( ) CY ADVANCE CYS TO HAK/HAIG FOR MEMO FOR PRES. ( ) STAFF SECRETARY REPLY FOR SIGNATURE ( ) FAR EAST FOR DISTRIBUTION/DISPATCH ( ) SECRETARIAT DISTRIBUTION/ACTION SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA MEMO TO ( ) NR EAST/NORTH AFRICA RECOMMENDATIONS ( ) EUROPE/CANADA JOINT MEMO ( ) LATIN AMERICA REFER TO STATE A ( , UNITED NATIONS NECESSARY ( ) ECONOMIC DUE DATE: LR PLANNING COMMENTS: (Including Special 01/15 Instructions) CONCURRENCE ( ) SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM ANALYSIS NSC PLANNING A Follow agrimen procedures CONGRESSIONAL DATE FROM TO S ACTION REQUIRED CY TO 1/9 Johns NSC/S send to Saunder for action INTERNAL/INTERIM ROUTING 1/9 Arunden S Tresfand from JHH 1/15 1/12/ Saunders Davis $ 1/16 C MAK to Ragins MICROFILM DATA CROSS REF WITH NOTIFY DATE SEE LOG Done Scott 1/16 DO DISPATCH: LETTER/MEMO DISPOSITION JOINED BY LOG COPIES: (AS MARKED ABOVE) SPECIAL FILE RQMT: SA, HP, HM JAN/18/1973 TO ) PAF SPECIAL DISPOSITION COMMENTS: WHC SUSPENSE CY ATTACHED: YES NO SUBF GPO: 1972-455-927 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 NSC/S NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20506 VIA LDX NSC -8766 CONFIDENTIAL January 16, 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Theodore L. Eliot, Jr. Executive Secretary Department of State SUBJECT: Presidential Appointment for Former Japanese Prime Minister Sato (S/S 7220049) - (S/S 7300638) To confirm our telephone notification, the President will see former Prime Minister Sato on Thursday, January 25 at 11:30 AM for ap- proximately 60 minutes. Would you please confirm acceptance. We have no objection to Mrs. Ushiba accompanying Mrs. Sato to her tea with Mrs. Nixon on January 24 at 3 PM. Would you please provide a brief memorandum of talking points and bios. Jeanne W. Davis Staff 0m Secretary MICROFILM DATA DOX INIT JAN 1 8 DATE 1973 ORIG) NSC ) PAF TO WHC SUBF DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 7300638 8766 department OF STATE Washington, D.C. 20520 January 13, 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR MR. HENRY A. KISSINGER THE WHITE HOUSE Subject: Meeting with Mrs. Nixon for Mrs. Sato The Japanese Embassy has informed us of Mrs. Sato's acceptance of Mrs. Nixon's invitation for tea in the Oval Room on Wednesday, January 24, at 3:00 p.m., for herself, Mrs. Kimura and Mrs. Yamanaka. The Japanese Embassy also noted that in accord with Japanese protocol, it would be customary for the wife of Ambassador Ushiba to accompany Mrs. Sato's party to tea with Mrs. Nixon, and asked that we obtain White House concurrence in this arrangement. mJH Theodore L. Eliot, Jr. Executive Secretary DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS PROJECT DOCUMENT CONTROL RECORD ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS FILE FOLDER A RESTRICTED DOCUMENT OR CASE FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS FILE FOLDER. FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THE ITEM REMOVED AND THE REASON FOR ITS REMOVAL, CONSULT DOCUMENT ENTRY NUMBER 4 ON EITHER THE DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD (GSA FORM 7279 OR NA FORM 1421) OR NARA WITHDRAWAL SHEET (GSA FORM 7122) LOCATED IN THE FRONT OF THIS FILE FOLDER. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION NLN Form 101 (revised 6-85) DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 2474 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON March 29, 1972 Dear Carol: It was a pleasure to hear from you again. I am sorry that we did not have the opportunity to meet during your fast trip here, but I am pleased to know of your satisfaction at the way things have worked out. You may be interested to know that in a recent letter to the President thanking him for the annual foreign policy report, King Birendra indicated his high esteem for you. We all appreciate the fine job you are doing in Nepal at this critical point in South Asia. I trust all continues to go well with you. Warm regards, Henry A. Kissinger The Honorable Carol C. Laise American Ambassador Kathmandu Dispatched via State Pouch 3/30/72 (rb) DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 2474 MEMORANDUM CONFIDENTIAL NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL ACTION MEMORANDUM FOR DR. KISSINGER FROM: HAROLD H. SAUNDERS SUBJECT: Letter from Ambassador Laise in Nepal You have a very warm letter at Tab B from Ambassador Carol Laise thank- ing you for the support you gave last month in a critical period -- aftermath of the Indo-Soviet treaty, South Asian war and the King's death -- to the main- tenance of a steady US presence in Nepal. She feels your assistance resulted in a timely response from the bureaucracy. I assume Ambassador Laise is referring to the fact that she was able to return with instructions to inform the King that the US is prepared to con- tinue a significant aid program in Nepal involving a greater use of dollar loans as well as multilateral organizations. Particularly, what this means is that the US is prepared to pick up the tab for economic assistance in the event we do not reach a satisfactory agreeme nt with India to continue finan- cing our aid to Nepal via excess rupees in India. Given the vagaries of the South Asian situation over the last year and recently the state of US-Indo relations, the Nepalese were concerned about the US commitment. Ambas- sador Laise was able to return with reassurances and particularly the fact that Nepal would not suffer as a result of US-Indian fallout over the rupees problem. Ambassador Laise also notes the President's China trip was enthusiastically received in Nepal. You may wish to know that the new King, Birendra, wrote the President a thank-you note (copy at Tab C) for receiving the foreign policy message in the course of which he praised Ambassador Laise. You may wish to send a warm letter to reply to Ambassador Laise since you did not see her while here last month. Recommendation: That you sign the letter to Ambassador Laise at Tab A. CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 NSC 2474 LIMITED OFFICIAL USE Kathmandu, Nepal March 15, 1972 Dear Henry: Since there was no chance to see you on my recent flying visit to Washington, I write to tell you how grateful I am for the support you gave at a critical point last month to the maintenance of a steady U. S. presence in Nepal. The effect of three successive events on Nepal - the Indo- Soviet agreement, the war, and the death of King Mahendra - has been traumatic. The steadfastness of the U. S. at such a time is important to help the Nepalese maintain a balanced approach in external relations and foster healthy develop- ment internally. While the desirability of such a position seems self-evident, particularly when the U. S. access and influence in Nepal rates so high in comparison to our op- portunities elsewhere in the subcontinent, it is not easy to get a timely response from the bureaucracy without an assist such as yours. I trust that with the modest but dependable support of the U. S. and King Birendra's limited but useful exposure to Harvard, U. S. - -Nepal relations will continue to evolve as a plus for our interests in the area. The President's visit to China has been enthusiastically received here. The Nepalese see it as a positive contribution The Honorable Henry A. Kissinger The White House Washington, D. C. LIMITED OFFICIAL USE DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 LIMITED OFFICIAL USE -2- to a less precarious future, though they know from experience that the process which has begun will require much patience and perserverance to produce the beneficial results we all hope for. Still they are greatly heartened by the start that has been made, particularly as the local Chinese Mission is apparently registering considerable euphoria. With thanks and warm regards, Sincerely, Carol Carol C. Laise LIMITED OFFICIAL USE DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 Royal Palace Rathmandu Depal March 9, 1972 Dear Mr. President, A copy of the third annual review of American foreign policy sent by you with your letter of February 16, 1972 has reached me and I am writing to thank you for your consideration in sending it. Since you have been so kind as to share your personal thoughts on international affairs, I am NM taking the liberty of expressing to you some of my own views. As you are aware, the Kingdom of Nepal is a landlocked country and consequently faces some problems of transit, trade and other matters which are peculiar to it. I assume that we will always have friendly and sympathetic consideration from you personally as well as from your Administration. In this context, I may mention that my government and I are of the opinion that continued interest on the part of the United States in line with the Nixon Doctrine in the affairs of this part of the world will be beneficial to the stability and progress of the whole region. The relations between our two countries are characterized by friendship and co-operation. The American Ambassador at our Court, Her Excellency Carol C. Laise, has done much to augment the existing friendly relations, which 1 am sure will become stronger in the years to come. With best wishes, Sincerely, Buindry Birendra, R. His Excellency Mr. Richard M. Nixon President of the United States of America The White House Washington D.C. GPO: 1972-455-927 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 DOC RECD G NBR INITIAL ACTION OFF MO DA MO DA HR NSC CORRESPONDENCE PROFILE 315 3219 02474 LOG IN/OUT ONLY TO: PRES FROM: ELIOT U NO FORN NODIS KISSINGER L ROGERS, W LOU l BUO EXDIS DOC SOURCE/CLASS/DESCRIPTION HAIG LAIRD, M C EYES ONLY LIMDIS LAise, CArol S CODE WORD RES DATA TS SENSITIVE Thanks HAK for US support to Nepal During a Crucial Month SUBJECT: REFERENCE: S/S OTHER NOT XEROXED APP'TS: PRES HAK TALKER MEMCON DATE REQ. INTERNAL ROUTING AND DISTRIBUTION ACTION REQUIRED ACTION INFO REC MEMO FOR HAK ( ) CY ADVANCE CYS TO HAK/HAIG FOR MEMO FOR PRES. ( ) STAFF SECRETARY REPLY FOR HAN SIGNATURE ( x ) FAR EAST FOR DISTRIBUTION/DISPATCH ( ) SECRETARIAT DISTRIBUTION/ACTION SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA X MEMO TO ( ) NR EAST/NORTH AFRICA x RECOMMENDATIONS ( ) EUROPE/CANADA JOINT MEMO ( ) LATIN AMERICA REFER TO STATE ( ) UNITED NATIONS ANY ACTION NECESSARY ( ) ECONOMIC CONCURRENCE ( ) SCIENTIFIC DUE DATE: LR PLANNING COMMENTS: (Including Special 3/27 Instructions) PROGRAM ANALYSIS NSC PLANNING CONGRESSIONAL DATE FROM TO S 3/28/72 Saunders HAK X Sgn ACTION REQUIRED Lhto amb. Lase (1/2) CY INTERNAL/INTERIM ROUTING 3/29 HAM signed lh to Lase CROSS REF WITH NOTIFY DA done MICROFILM DATA to DO DISPATCH: LETTER/MEMO from SEE LOG INIT DISPOSITION JOINED BY LOG COPIES: (AS MARKED ABOVE) MAR3, DATE SPECIAL FILE RQMT: SA, HP, HM ORIG) 1972 NSC TO ) PAF SPECIAL DISPOSITION COMMENTS: WHC SUSPENSE CY ATTACHED: YES NO SUBF GPO: 1972-455-927 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 7201858 NSC 1140 department OF state Washington, D.C. 20520 CONFIDENTIAL February 1, 1972 MEMORANDUM FOR MR. HENRY A. KISSINGER THE WHITE HOUSE Subject: Birendra: New King of Nepal The immediate succession to King Mahendra of Nepal, who succumbed to a heart attack in the early hours of January 31, has apparently taken place smoothly. Within a few hours the King's Council had announced that Crown Prince Birendra, Mahendra's eldest son and heir apparent, had ascended the throne. Although the 26-year old Birendra had been given some administrative duties by his autocratic father, he is considered largely untested and inexperienced in terms of the two crucial requirements for a Nepalese monarch. Internationally, it is essential that Nepal maintain a balance in its relations with India and China, offending neither and meeting the minimal requirements of both. This will be particularly difficult as a result of the increased strength of India and increased influence of the Soviet Union in the subcontinent following the recent Indo-Pakistani war and the emergence of Bangladesh. Domestically, the king must bridge the many divisive tendencies in Nepal - including ethnic, linguistic and regional loyalties - which tend to promote political instability and economic stagnation. Mahendra was a virtuoso at both these political games. Birendra is very different from his father. Educated out of Nepal (in Darjeeling, Eton, Harvard and Tokyo University) and widely-travelled, Birendra is clearly more aware of the outside world, of the requirements of modern diplomacy, of the problems of economic development than was his father when he CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 2 ascended the throne in 1955. Birendra in the past has shown himself to be interested in more efficient administration and dedicated to the elimination of corruption and nepotism which is commonplace in Nepal. He has shown some impatience and bull-headedness in the pursuit of these goals and some observers have questioned whether he might not be overly Westernized in the sense that he may not appreciate the conservative dynamics of the feudal social organization of Nepal. In his relations with Americans, both official and unofficial, he is friendly and engaging. He has been particularly interested in the Peace Corps and has had warm relations with several volunteers. Particularly because of Nepal's concerns result- ing from the Indo/Soviet increase in influence in South Asia, Birendra's most immediate international problems will relate to his relations with the Indians and Chinese. The role of third countries such as the U.S. will be important in steadying his hand while he deals with his two neighbors. He will highly value a reassuring and supportive American policy toward Nepal. Thus for the immediate future, problems in U.S.-Nepal relations which had already been looming take on an added dimension. One of these relates to how we can meet the longstanding Nepali desire that we maintain significant aid programs in Nepal despite problems related to availability of Indian rupees and decreasing dollar funds. Janes L. Eliot, Jr Executive Secretary CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 DOC RECD LOG NBR INITIAL ACTION OFF MO DA Mo DA HR NSC CORRESPONDENCE PROFILE 02 01 02 01 12 01140 LOG IN/OUT ONLY TO: PRES FROM: ELIOT X U NO FORN NODIS X KISSINGER ROGERS, W LOU BUO EXDIS DOC SOURCE/CLASS/DESCRIPTION HAIG LAIRD, M C X EYES ONLY LIMDIS S CODE WORD RES DATA TS SENSITIVE SUBJECT: Bureb Birendra, new King of Nepal re: International Implications #7201858 REFERENCE: S/S OTHER NOT XEROXED APP'TS: PRES HAK TALKER MEMCON DATE REQ. INTERNAL ROUTING AND DISTRIBUTION ACTION REQUIRED ACTION INFO REC ??? MEMO FOR HAK ( X ) CY ADVANCE CYS TO HAK/HAIG FOR MEMO FOR PRES. ( ) STAFF SECRETARY REPLY FOR SIGNATURE ( ) FAR EAST FOR DISTRIBUTION/DISPATCH ( ) SECRETARIAT DISTRIBUTION/ACTION SUBSAHARAN AFRICA MEMO TO ( ) NR EAST/NORTH AFRICA X RECOMMENDATIONS ( ) EUROPE/CANADA JOINT MEMO ( ) LATIN AMERICA REFER TO STATE ( ) UNITED NATIONS ANY ACTION NECESSARY ( ) ECONOMIC CONCURRENCE ( ) SCIENTIFIC DUE DATE: 02/05 LR PLANNING COMMENTS: (Including Special Instructions) PROGRAM ANALYSIS NSC PLANNING CONGRESSIONAL DATE FROM TO S ACTION REQUIRED CY TO 2/3/72 Sunders NSC/S Covered in President daily brief 2/4. HHS INTERNAL/INTERIM ROUTING 2/3/72 C No Action Req per Launders MICROFILM DATA CROSS REF WITH NOTIFY DATE SEE LOG DISPATCH: LETTER/MEMO DISPOSITION JOINED BY LOG COPIES: (AS MARKED ABOVE) SA, PER 0 7 1972 INIT DATE SPECIAL FILE RQMT: HP, HM NSC SPECIAL DISPOSITION COMMENTS: TO ) PAF WHC SUSPENSE CY ATTACHED: YES NO SUBF # GPO: 1971-412-412 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 7119477 35386 department OF STATE Washington, D.C. 20520 December 3, 1971 THAN CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR MR. HENRY A. KISSINGER THE WHITE HOUSE Subject: Message from the President to King Mahendra of Nepal On September 13 the President sent a letter to King Mahendra in response to the King's letter of July 31. The King's letter voiced his support for the President's decision to visit the People's Republic of China and invited the President and Mrs. Nixon to visit Nepal either enroute to or returning from China. The President's September 13 letter thanked the King for the invitation and stated that he regretted not being able to give the King "a definite response at this time, since our planning is only in its early stages." Now that a public announcement has been made about the schedule for the Presidential trip to China, it would be appropriate to send the King a more definitive response to his invitation. Attached is a suggested message to be sent from the President to King Mahendra. Rohillh for Theodore L. Eliot, Jr. Executive Secretary Attachments: 1. Letter to President from King Mahendra 2. September 13 Letter from President to King 3. Suggested Message CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 Royal Palace Nepal July 31, 1971 Your Excellency, I have been heartened by the wise decision you have taken in announcing your forthcoming visit to China. We have always held that a country of the size and the population of China cannot be simply ignored. We welcome Your Excellency's decision and we hope 20 2 result of Your Excellency' = decisive and bold step the area of peace would be augmented many times and further hope the small nations of the world would also gain by this. On this occasion my wife and I would like to renew our long standing invitation to Your Excellency and Mrs. Nixon to pay us a visit either on your way to or on your return from China at Your Excellency's convenience. Please accept, Your Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration. Yours sincerely, ! MAHENDRA, R.) His Excellency Mr. Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States of America, White House, WASHINGTON, D.C. DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 For Nailine Mr. Me Tigon Burleigh THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON September 13, 1971 Your Majesty: I was very pleased to receive your gracious letter of July 31 expressing your approval of my decision to accept an invitation to visit the People's Republic of China. In opening the door for more normal relations between the United States and the People's Republic of China, I am hopeful that all nations will gain from the reduction of tensions which should result. Your country and mine share the goal of build- ing a lasting peace in the world. I look upon this journey as an important step toward achiev- ing that goal. May I also express my deepest appreciation for Your Majesty's kind suggestion that Mrs. Nixon and I visit your kingdom before or after our visit to China. I regret that I cannot give you a definite response at this time, since our planning is only in its early stages. But again, let me convey our sincere gratitude for your most thoughtful invitation. You have my warmest thanks for your generous expression of support and encouragement. Sincerely, Richard nifon His Majesty Mahendra Bir Bikram Shah Deva King of Nepal Kathmandu DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL SUGGESTED MESSAGE Your Majesty: As you are aware, I have recently announced some of the detailed plans for our visit to the People's Republic of China. As I indicated in my letter to you of September 13, I greatly appreciate your suggestion that Mrs. Nixon and I visit your kingdom before or after our visit to China. I have given thorough consideration to your kind suggestion and much as both Mrs. Nixon and I would very much enjoy meeting Her Majesty and you again and spending a few days in your peaceful and lovely country, I find that such a visit at this time is not possible. May I once again thank you for the kind invitation and also for your support and encouragement of my decision to make this trip which we continue to view as an important step toward building a lasting world peace. Sincerely, Richard Nixon His Majesty Mahendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev, King of Nepal, Kathmandu. Department of State DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 DEPARTMENT to STATE CONFIDENTIAL DEPAI Classification UNITED the Department of State INDICATE: STATES of TELEGRAM COLLECT CHARGE TO DISTRIBUTION ACTION: Amembassy KATHMANDU STATE Please deliver the following message from President Nixon to His Majesty. QUOTE As you are aware, I have recently announced some of the detailed plans for our visit to the People's Republic of China. As I indicated in my letter to you of September 13, I greatly appreciate your suggestion that Mrs. Nixon and I visit your kingdom before or after our visit to China. I have given thorough con- sideration to your kind suggestion and much as both Mrs. Nixon and I would very much enjoy meeting Her Majesty and you again and spending a few days in your peaceful and lovely country, I find that such a visit at this time is not possible. May I once again thank you for the kind invitation and also for your support and encouragement of my decision to make this trip which we continue to view as an important step toward building a lasting world peade. Sincerely, Richard Nixon. END QUOTE DRAFTED BY: DRAFTING DATE TEL. EXT. APHROVED ADD NEA Christopher Van Hollen NEA/INC:APBurleigh:nm 12/1/71 20653 MXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CLEARANCES: NEA/INC - Mr. Schneider S/S - 7119477 EA/ACA - Mr. Brown White House - S/CPR - Mr. Smoak CONFIDENTIAL FORM Classification DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 DOC RECD LO^ NBR INITIAL ACTION OFF MO DA MO DA HR NSC CORRESPONDENCE PROFILE 123 1249 35386 LOG IN/OUT ONLY Holdridge TO: PRES FROM: ELIOT 1 U NO FORN NODIS KISSINGER x ROGERS, W LOU BUO EXDIS DOC SOURCE/CLASS/DESCRIPTION HAIG LAIRD, M C x EYES ONLY LIMDIS S CODE WORD RES DATA SUBJECT: Augs Folla by the to Keng TS Thaherdray SENSITIVE Repal from the Pres on the hpcosing PRC trip REFERENCE: S/S 7119477 OTHER NOT XEROXED APP'TS: PRES HAK TALKER MEMCON DATE REQ. INTERNAL ROUTING AND DISTRIBUTION ACTION REQUIRED ACTION INFO REC MEMO FOR HAK ( ) CY ADVANCE CYS TO HAK/HAIG FOR MEMO for PRES. ( ) STAFF SECRETARY REPLY FOR SIGNATURE ( ) FAR EAST X FOR DISTRIBUTION/DISPATCH ( ) SECRETARIAT DISTRIBUTION/ACTION SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA MEMO TO X ( ) NR EAST/NORTH AFRICA RECOMMENDATIONS ( ) EUROPE/CANADA JOINT MEMO ( ) LATIN AMERICA REFER TO STATE ( ) UNITED NATIONS ANY ACTION NECESSARY ( ) ECONOMIC CONCURRENCE ( & ) SCIENTIFIC DUE DATE: LR PLANNING PROGRAM ANALYSIS COMMENTS: (Including Special 12/10 Instructions) NSC PLANNING CONGRESSIONAL DATE FROM TO S ACTION REQUIRED CY TO 12/17 take NSC/S Response 85 King Chahendra incaporated INTERNAL/INTERIM ROUTING in onl message (steemon Pus' luneon 12/20 l Peling times Obecomed by O/SE per 55397 MICROFILM DATA CROSS REF WITH NOTIFY DATE Non SEE LOG DISPATCH: LETTER/MEMO DISPOSITION JOINED BY LOG COPIES: (AS MARKED ABOVE) 02.21.1971 DATE SPECIAL FILE RQMT: SA, HP, HM ORIG) NSC TO 1 PAF Y SPECIAL DISPOSITION COMMENTS: WHC f SUSPENSE CY ATTACHED: YES NO SUBF # GPO: 1971-412-412 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS PROJECT DOCUMENT CONTROL RECORD ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS FILE FOLDER A RESTRICTED DOCUMENT OR CASE FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS FILE FOLDER. FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THE ITEM REMOVED AND THE REASON FOR ITS REMOVAL, CONSULT DOCUMENT ENTRY NUMBER 8 ON EITHER THE DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD (GSA FORM 7279 OR NA FORM 1421) OR NARA WITHDRAWAL SHEET (GSA FORM 7122) LOCATED IN THE FRONT OF THIS FILE FOLDER. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION NLN Form 101 (revised 6-85) DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 ACTION 5362 DEC 22 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT HR FROM: Henry A. Missinges) Signs SUBJECT: Wedding Invitation from King of Nepal King Aiabendra of Nepal has invited you to the wedding of Me son, Crown Prince Birendra (Tab A). I assume that you do not wish to attend personally, and there is no reason why you should. I think, however, that It would be in our interest for you to demonstrate your personal interest in this small, friendly and strategically ocated country by selecting a delegation to represent you. The leaders of the other major powers with a stake in Napal's fulure--particularly the Soviets, and the Communist Chinese-will probably do this and some of the Asian leaders will either be attending or will also be sending personal representatives. The Nepalese, who are very sensitive to the net 6 for our support to remain an independent buffer between India and China, might regard it as a serious slight If you were to simply send your regrets. This would also undercut the effect of the Vice President's visit next month. Under Secretary Richardson thinks that you would be most effectively represented by members of your own family, especially since Nepalese place such A high value on family relations (Tab B). He auggents that you consider sending Julie and David Elsenhower. If they are name to attend, I would suggest your daughter Tricia, who in any event night also enjoy going. This could be a rewarding and most enjoyable trip for them. The projram of colorful and picturesque events will take place from February 27 through March 3 and should attract considerable International press coverage. Nepal, as you know, is the unspolled Switzerland of Asia and a most enjoyable country to visit under any circumstances. Their activities would be strictly social in nature. fater DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 You may also want to consider sending some political figure as an official representative of the Americ in people. Under Secretary Richardson notes that Secretary Romney is well acqualited with the area (he represented you as the Indian President's funeral last spring) and that Secretary Stans has visited Nepal in a private capacity. He also suggests a State Governor as a possibility. I would only add that this would be a plum for anyone you selected and that there would be no reason for limiting yourself to one person. 1 am attaching at Tab C our embassy's des cription of what to expect is case you would like to show It to your daughters. Recommendation: That you express your regrets to King Mahendra, and send an official delegation, including members of your family and of political personality to represent you and the American people. When you have selected your delegation, I will send an appropriate response to King Mahendra before the end of the month. Approve Disappriove If you approve, whom would you like to serd? SMH:HHSaunders:tmt 12/19/69 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 Narayanhity Royal Palace, Kathmandu, Nepal. November 11, 1969 Your Excellency, It gives Us great bleasure to inform Your Excellen cy of the wedding of Our son Crown Prince Birendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev with Princess Aishwarya Rajyalaxmi Devi, daughter of Lieutenant-General Kendra Shum Shere Jung Bahadur Rana, to be held on February 27, 1970 and to invite you most cordial- ly to the wedding ceremony at Narayanhity Royal Palace. We earnestly hope that you will find it convenient to grace the occasion with our august presence. Sincerely, Mahendra R. His Excellency Mr. Richard M. Nixon President of the United States of America White House Washington D.C. DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 5362 DEPARTMENT OF STATE WASHINGTON December 8, 1969 18906 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT -Subject: Invitation to the Royal Wedding of the Crown Prince, Son of the King of Nepal King Mahendra of Nepal has sent you the enclosed invitation to attend the wedding of his son, the Crown Prince, on February 27, 1970. This will be a most important event in Nepal and the ce:remony itself will be colorful and picturesqué. The complete program of events will take place from February 27 through March 3, 1970. I believe this invitation provides an opportunity for you to demonstrate further your personal concern for the independence and progress of the small, non- alígned Asian nations. As his schedule now stands, the Vice President will have recently visited Kathmandu. However, in Nepal where family relations are so sig- nificant, I believe you could be represented most effectively by members of your personal family if that were convenient. I suggest that you consider sending Mr. and Mrs. David Eisenhower as your personal rep- resentatives. This could be a rewarding and enjoyable experience for them. In addition, you may wish to consider sending as an official representative of the American people a Cabinet officer, such as Secretary Stans or Secretary Romney. Secretary Romney is well acquainted with the DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 -2- area and Secretary Stans has visited Nepal in a private capacity. Another possibility would be a State Governor. A suggested reply to the King is enclosed. 522 Acting Secretary Enclosures: Suggested Reply to King Mahendra Invitation DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 DEPARTMENT OF STATE SUGGESTED REPLY Your Majesty: I have received your most kind invitation to be present on the happy occasion of the marriage of your son, Crown Prince Birendra, on February 27, 1970. I greatly regret that official duties will prevent my attending. I would, however, like to send as my representatives Please convey my warm congratulations to your son and my wish for much happiness in the future. Sincerely, Richard M. Nixon His Majesty, King Mahendra, Royal Palace, Kathmandu, Nepal. DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 PROGRAMME February 27, 1970 1500 hrs. Departure of the Wedding Procession February 28, 1970 1700 hrs. Coming in of the Bride { 1800-2000 hrs. March Reception 2, 1970 2015-2115 hrs. Cultural Programme at Rashtriya Nachghar 1830-2030 hrs. Military Tatoo March 3, 1970 at Shahi Sainik Manch 2100 hrs. Buffet Dinner DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 IMPORTANT REQUEST 1. The following arrangements are envisaged for guests. A delegation led by the Head of State A suite and three other rooms A delegation led by the Prime Minister A suite and two other rooms A delegation led by a Minister or a Special Representative Two Rooms 2. The above will be the guests of His Majesty's Governn ent from February 26 to March 3, 1970 and arrangements are made accordingly n 3. Dress:- Formal with Decorations. Note: The delegations are requested to make their own arrangement for members exceeding the above number of rooms and beyond the days mentioned above. The Protocol Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, will, however, assist them if specific requirements are notified in time. A reply within December will be highly appreciated as it will facilitate the arrangement. Protocol Division, Minis ry of Foreign Affairs DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON ACTION 5362 MEMORANDUM FOR DR. KISSINGER December 19, 1969 FROM: Harold H. Saunders 7tal SUBJECT: Wedding Invitation from the King of Nepal King Mahendra of Nepal has invited the President to the wedding of Crown Prince Birendra on February 27. I assume that the President will not attend. The alternative- which most other invitees will probably fall back on--is to send a delegation personally representing the President. Under Secretary Richardson suggests that the President send a member of his family as his personal representative and some political personality as a representative of the American people. It would be very much in our interest to do this and an enjoyable experience for whoever might go. Recommendation: That you send the memo at Tab A to the President. As soon as he makes his decision, I will draft an appropriate response to King Mahendra. DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 Files ACTION 5362 MEMORANDUM FOR DR. KISSINGER December 19, 1969 FROM: Harold H. Saunders SUBJECT: Wedding Invitation from the King of Nepal King Mahendra of Nepal has invited the President to the wedding of Crown Prince Birendra on February 27. I assume that the President will not attend. The alternative--which most other invitees will probably fall back on--is to send a delegation personally representing the President. Under Secretary Richardson suggests that the President send a member of his family as his personal representative and some political personality as a representative of the American people. It would be very much in our interest to do this and an enjoyable experience for whoever might go. Recommendation: That you send the memo at Tab A to the President. As soon as he makes his decision, I will draft an appropriate response to King Mahendra. SMH:HHSaunders:tmt 12/19/69 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 ACTION 5362 DEC 22 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: Henry A. Kissinger (Signed) His SUBJECT: Wedding Invitation from King of Nepal King Mahendra of Nepal has invited you to the wedding of his son, Crown Prince Birendra (Tab A). I assume that you do not wish to attend personally, and there is no reason why you should. 1 think, however, that it would be in our interest for you to demonstrate your personal interest in this small, friendly and strategically located country by selecting a delegation to represent you. The leaders of the other major powers with a stake in Nepal's future--particularly the Soviets, and the Communist Chinese--will probably do this and some of the Asian leaders will either be attending or will also be sending personal representatives. The Nepalese, who are very sensitive to the need for our support to remain an independent buffer between India and China, might regard it as a serious slight if you were to simply send your regrets. This would also undercut the effect of the Vice President's visit next month. Under Secretary Richardson thinks that you would be most effectively represented by members of your own family, especially since the Nepalese place such a high value on family relations (Tab B). He suggests that you consider sending Julie and David Eisenhower. If they are unable to attend, I would suggest your daughter Tricia, who in any event might also enjoy going. This could be a rewarding and most enjoyable trip for them. The program of colorful and picturesque events will take place from February 27 through March 3 and should attract considerable international press coverage. Nepal, as you know, is the unspoiled Switzerland of Asia and a most enjoyable country to visit under any circumstances. Their activities would be strictly social in nature. DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 - 2 - You may also want to consider sending some political figure as an official representative of the American people. Under Secretary Richardson notes that Secretary Romney is well acquainted with the area (he represented you at the Indian President's funeral last spring) and that Secretary Stans has visited Nepal in a private capacity. He also suggests a State Governor as a possibility. I would only add that this would be a plum for anyone you selected and that there would be no reason for limiting yourself to one person. 1 am attaching at Tab C our embassy's description of what to expect in case you would like to show it to your daughters. Recommendation: That you express your regrets to King Mahendra, and send an official delegation, including members of your family and a political personality to represent you and the American people. When you have selected your delegation, I will send an appropriate response to King Mahendra before the end of the month. Approve Disapprove If you approve, whom would you like to send? SMH:HHSaunders:tmt 12/19/69 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 Narayanhity Royal Palace, Kathmandu, Nepal. November 11, 1969 Your Excellency, It gives Us great pleasure to inform Your Excellency of the wedding of Our son Crown Prince Birendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev with Princess Aishwarya Rajyalaxmi Devi, daughter of Lieutenant-General Kendra Shum Shere Jung Bahadur Rana, to be held on February 27, 1970 and to invite you most cordial- ly to the wedding ceremony at Narayanhity Royal Palace. We earnestly hope that you will find it convenient to grace the occasion with your august presence. Sincerely, Mahendra R. His Excellency Mr. Richard M. Nixon President of the United States of America White House Washington D.C. DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 5362 DEPARTMENT OF STATE WASHINGTON 18906 December 8, 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT Subject: Invitation to the Royal Wedding of the Crown Prince, Son of the King of Nepal King Mahendra of Nepal has sent you the enclosed invitation to attend the wedding of his son, the Crown Prince, on February 27, 1970. This will be a most important event in Nepal and the ceremony itself will be colorful and picturesque. The complete program of events will take place from February 27 through March 3, 1970. I believe this invitation provides an opportunity for you to demonstrate further your personal concern for the independence and progress of the small, non- aligned Asian nations. As his schedule now stands, the Vice President will have recently visited Kathmandu. However, in Nepal where family relations are so sig- nificant, II believe you could be represented most effectively by members of your personal family if that were convenient. I suggest that you consider sending Mr. and Mrs. David Eisenhower as your personal rep- resentatives. This could be a rewarding and enjoyable experience for them. In addition, you may wish to consider sending as an official representative of the American people a Cabinet officer, such as Secretary Stans or Secretary Romney. Secretary Romney is well acquainted with the DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 -2- area and Secretary Stans has visited Nepal in a private capacity. Another possibility would be a State Governor. A suggested reply to the King is enclosed. our Acting Secretary Enclosures: Suggested Reply to King Mahendra Invitation DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 DEPARTMENT OF STATE SUGGESTED REPLY Your Majesty: I have received your most kind invitation to be present on the happy occasion of the marriage of your son, Crown Prince Birendra, on February 27, 1970. I greatly regret that official duties will prevent my attending. I would, however, like to send as my representatives Please convey my warm congratulations to your son and my wish for much happiness in the future. Sincerely, Richard M. Nixon His Majesty, King Mahendra, Royal Palace, Kathmandu, Nepal. DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 PROGRAMME February 27, 1970 1500 hrs. Departure of the Wedding Procession February 28, 1970 1700 hrs. Coming in of the Bride March 1800-2000 hrs. Reception 2, 1970 2015-2115 hrs. Cultural Programme at Rashtriya Nachghar 1830-2030 hrs. Military Tatoo March 3, 1970 at Shahi Sainik Manch 2100 hrs. Buffet Dinner DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 IMPORTANT REQUEST 1. The following arrangements are envisaged for guests. A delegation led by the Head of State A suite and three other rooms A delegation led by the Prime Minister A suite and two other rooms A delegation led by a Minister or a Special Representative Two Rooms 2. The above will be the guests of His Majesty's Government from February 26 to March 3, 1970 and arrangements are made accordingly. 3. Dress:- Formal with Decorations. Note: The delegations are requested to make their own arrangement for members exceeding the above number of rooms and beyond the days mentioned above. The Protocol Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, will, however, assist them if specific requirements are notified in time. A reply within December will be highly appreciated as it will facilitate the arrangement. Protocol Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 1528 NSCIG/NEA 69-28 August 8, 1969 NSC INTERDEPARTMENTAL GROUP FOR NEAR EAST AND SOUTH ASIA COUNTRY POLICY STATEMENT NEPAL GROUP 3 Downgraded at 12-year intervals; not automatically declassified. CONFIDENTIAL 13526 CONFIDENTIAL DEPARTMENT OF STATE Washington, D.C 20520 NSCIG/NEA 69-28 August 8, 1969 NSC INTERDEPARTMENTAL GROUP FOR NEAR EAST AND SOUTH ASIA The attached Country Policy Statement on Nepal has been approved by the NSC Interdepartmental Group for Near East and South Asia. It is issued for the guidance of all concerned with United States policy and programs in Nepal. Joseph J Sins Joseph J. Sisco Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs David T. Schneider Country Director for Nepal Sidney Sohn Sidney Sober Staff Director, NSCIG/NEA CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONF IDENTIAL COUNTRY POLICY STATEMENT - - NEPAL Contents Page Background 1 United States Objectives 3 United States Strategy 4 A. Options 4 B. Policy Guidelines 6 Political 6 Economic 7 Psychological 7 Security 8 CONF IDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL NEPAL COUNTRY POLICY STATEMENT BACKGROUND Kept in isolation by its feudal rulers until the revolution in 1951, Nepal is still one of the most primitive countries in terms of political, social and economic conditions. The single most important fact of life in Nepal's foreign affairs continues to be the small kingdom's geographic situation landlocked between India and Tibet. Its territory is a buffer where the rival interests of China and India impinge and impact. Nepal is resentful of India's attempts at political influence and its almost total dependence on India in economic affairs. About 90 percent of Nepal's foreign trade is with her southern neighbor and India has the largest aid program in the country. Nepal has encouraged friendly relations with China as one means of offsetting the heavy Indian influence. Relations between Nepal and India continue to be very much like those between an adolescent and his parent -- basically compatible, but subject to the occasional emotional out- bursts that accompany the struggle to achieve true independence. By comparison, the Nepalese Government evinces considerably more caution in its relations with China, a studied friend- liness not unmixed with fear. At the same time Nepal has sought other countries' interest and involvement to reinforce its image as an independent state. Nepal's paramount interest is in defending its independence, in its eyes threatened more by Indian economic domination than by any Chinese military move or political activities. Notable highlights in the campaign to build up recognition around the world are Nepal's successful bid for a 1969-71 UN Security Council term and its active participation in meetings on problems of landlocked countries. Recent trade GROUP 3 Downgraded at 12-year intervals; not automatically declassified. CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 2. talks with India offer some hope for improved conditions for Nepalese transit trade. Relations with Communist China, slightly strained at the height of the Cultural Revolution in 1967, have returned to their normal cordial state. Chinese aid has increased to about $7 million annually. Some control has been exerted over the extensive Chinese propaganda activities, and the government is beginning a program for development of the northern border areas in an effort to counter Chinese influence. Aware of the pressures on her from both north and south, Nepal has sought contact with both the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. to offset the influence of her neighbors. The King's visit to the United States in the fall of 1967 and exchanges on aid matters related to this visit have underscored the position of the United States as a friendly but distant and disinterested power helping Nepal maintain its balance and deal with develop- ment problems in which it does not want its neighbors to have a predominant influence. The USSR, the other major power physically represented there, maintains a small aid and a sizeable propaganda presence, primarily as an extension of its Indian policy. Internally, Nepal is entering a new period of political develop- ment. Having firmly established a partyless system of govern- ment based on village councils, in 1968 the King released the former Nepali Congress Party Prime Minister B.P. Koirala after eight years imprisonment. Koirala's release was the key to better relations with the democratic pro-Indian opposition elements. King Mahendra has guided the political scene to a point where accommodation may be possible between his role as absolute monarch and the development of popular, democratic institutions, without political parties as such. At the present time, and particularly while moves to accommodate the democratic elements within the Panchayat system continue, CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 3. the small illegal communist parties of Nepal (right -wing, left-wing and left extremists) pose the only organized threat to the country's internal political stability; fortunately, these parties are partially crippled by their own internal and personality squabbles. Nepal as an economic unit has a few advantages but basically it faces most of the problems of underdeveloped countries around the world, and then some. Nepal's population is overwhelmingly dependent on traditional agriculture for its livelihood, the manufacturing and service industries are in only rudimentary stages, and transport and communications in this mountainous kingdom are grossly inadequate. In addition, Nepal is a land- locked nation dependent on India for transit facilities (as well as for most of its trade), with all the trade expansion problems such a situation engenders. Having started the modern- izing process as late as it did and from such a low base, Nepal is especially handicapped in the essential underpinnings of modernity, such as educated and trained manpower. Although the average Nepalese is among the poorest of Asians, with per capita income standing at roughly $75 per year, some progress has been made during the last fifteen ars or so of Nepal's exposure to the outside world. Aware that substantially increased assistance from any aid donor would upset the careful political balance, Nepal endeavors to keep assistance coming from as many sources as possible. India now is the largest donor with a $14 million program, the US program is about $10 million (largely in surplus PL-480 Indian rupees), China's $7 million and the USSR $500,000. A noteworthy arrangement is the military assistance from Israel for paratroop training. UNITED STATES OBJECTIVES Our interest in Nepal stems almost entirely from our larger interest in contributing to the security of the Indian Sub- continent. Our policy aims in India are intended to be the chief beneficiary of our relationship with Nepal in that we seek, as appropriate, to share with India the task of helping Nepal to remain an area of relative calm and order and to prevent its subversion by Communist China. CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 4. Our basic objectives are: 1. The establishment of a politically effective, modernizing Nepalese nation, hopefully increasingly democratic, which is capable of holding its own in the present-day world and contributing its mite to the maintenance of world order. Such a Nepal would work in close cooperation with India on a wide range of practical problems affecting the ultimate security of the Subcontinent. 2. A major corollary to this essentially political aim is the maintenance of a satisfactory rate of economic and social progress which will permit a peaceful and orderly transition of Nepal to a modern state. UNITED STATES STRATEGY Our activities in Nepal are guided by our desire to encourage good Indo-Nepalese relations. We maintain an American presence at a moderate level, on a par with other major powers, and contri- bute to Nepalese development in an unobtrusive manner. A. Options In terms of overall strategy the options open to the United States in Nepal are identifiable primarily in relation to the total size and impact of US programs and presence. Those choices readily available to the United States can be stated generally as: (1) continuation of roughly the present degree of our involvement in Nepal; (2) a phased, judicious reduction in our presence; and (3) revisions of program emphasis by agency in combination with either of the foregoing options. The current United States presence in Nepal encompasses a dozen-officer Embassy; a 60-man, $10 million annual aid program; 200-plus Peace Corps Volunteers; and a three-officer USIS establishment. A careful overall decrease CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 5. of this US presence, if dictated by budgetary or other compelling factors, would not jeopardize the United States' minimal bilateral interest in Nepal, nor, most probably, our more important area interests concerning the future of India. Timing would be important, however, and it would be absolutely essential that care be taken to avoid the appearance of repudiating our past relationships with Nepal and India as they have evolved over recent years. A fundamental point in this formulation is the fact, pre- viously noted, that Nepal is not an area of priority US policy concerns. India must assume first responsibility for Nepal with respect to the security of the Subcontinent, tempered by Nepal's desire that no neighbor becomes over- involved in its affairs. US aims in this regard are furthered by a responsible presence and demonstrable assistance per se; the precise size and agency combination of involvement, within reasonable bounds, is less important. The extremes of a significantly expanded US presence or abandonment of this presence (or reduction to a very low level) appear unrealistic. The former is not necessary to accomplish our basically political objective in Nepal, and indeed might prove counter-productive. The latter could possibly increase the potentiality for instability in the area. It would be well to avoid the possible political dislocations and policy disorientation in the area that would be attendant upon a perceived significant change in US attitudes toward Nepal. The current US presence, while substantial, is not overwhelming. The size of the Embassy is on a par with other important powers such as India, China and the USSR; the USIS staff is minimal; the large Peace Corps program has been generally successful and well received. (However, the Peace Corps may already be near the limit of Nepalese political and organization absorptive capacity.) USAID/Nepal's staff and program funds, while believed to be in an appro- priate range, are expected in any event to decline in the near term as a result of cutbacks in worldwide aid availabilities. CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 6. If extrinsic factors dictate a substantially reduced US program and presence in Nepal, such a reduction could be shared to some extent by all agencies represented there, but the burden of such cuts could be accepted with least damage to our interests by the AID and Peace Corps programs. B. Policy Guidelines Political 1. We should work with the Monarchy and the present governmental structure, while encourageing the more liberal influences in the Government and the society. We should continue contacts with the various political factions in order to keep informed of their views and activities. 2. We should indicate through our presence US interest in Nepalese efforts to modernize and develop con- tacts with other nations, and we should encourage through the same presence close Indo-Nepalese collaboration on matters of mutual security. a. A visit by a high-ranking US official to Nepal, following-up King Mahendra's 1967 State Visit, would be in keeping with our political posture. No one of Cabinet rank or higher has visited Nepal officially. b. We should continue our support for the East-West Highway as an important factor in demonstrating our interest in Indo-Nepalese collaboration on security-related projects. 3. We should demonstrate to India that our involvement in Nepal is based on our common subcontinental interests and CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 7. that we support an increasingly responsible role for India in its relations with Nepal. 4. We should encourage Nepal in its present belief that its vital national interests are well served by identifica- tion with forces which support international law and order, and by playing a constructive role in the United Nations and the various specialized agencies. Economic 1. We should continue to support Nepal's developmental efforts at approximately the present level, largely through the provision of rupee capital resources and the assistance of Peace Corps Volunteers. a. We should continue to use Indian rupees accumulated under PL-480 programs in India to finance the local currency costs of our aid and information programs in Nepal. This source of funds, used with the consent of the Government of India, permits us to offer significant economic assistance at moderate cost. b. Should a reduction in AID operations become necessary, the participant training program and on-going projects in agricultural production and education should be accorded the highest priority for funds. 2. We should encourage Indo-Nepalese economic cooperation and foster increased contact between Nepal and the various international organizations in attacking Nepal's long-range developmental problems, especially in terms of needed technical assistance and the training of skilled man- power, but also in terms of financial assistance. Psychological 1. We should utilize the cultural, exchange and information programs to support, as appropriate, our political, CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 8. economic, and security objectives, emphasizing in particular the compatibility of American-Nepalese interests and the benefits to be derived from economic development within a democratic framework. Security 1. We should encourage Indo-Nepalese military coopera- tion and be prepared, in accordance with the 1964 tripartite arrangement, to consider instituting a program through which Nepal could obtain military equipment which in our judgement is required by Nepal and India is unable to provide. 2. While leaving to India the principal military role, we should continue the limited training in US military schools of qualified Nepalese Army officers. CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20506 July 31, 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR Mr. Sidney Sober Department of State, NEA/RA FROM: Morton H. Halperin mA SUBJECT: Proposed Country Policy Statements on Afghanistan and Nepal We have reviewed the proposed Country Policy Statements on Afghanistan and Nepal and have no objection to their being issued. DECLASSIFIED 7/31/69 pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 10284 CONFIDENTIAL NSCIG/NEA 69-18 84 June 30, 1969 NSC INTERDEPARTMENTAL GROUP FOR NEAR EAST AND SOUTH ASIA TO: Mr. Henry A. Kissinger Chairman, NSC Review Group Mr. Eliot L. Richardson Chairman, Under Secretaries Committee FROM: NSCIG/NEA - Joseph J. Sisco, Chairman GD SUBJECT: Country Policy Statement on Nepal The NSC Interdepartmental Group for the Near East and South Asia has approved the attached Country Policy Statement on Nepal. This paper is one in a series intended to provide a fresh look at our interests and objectives in various NEA countries and to review the adequacy of our policies. Subject to any comment you may have, we propose to issue the attached paper for the guidance of all concerned with United States policy and programs in Nepal. In preparing the attached paper, we have had the benefit of detailed suggestions from our Embassy in Kathmandu. Representatives of the following agencies participated in NSCIG/NEA consideration and approval of the paper: State, Agriculture, AID, CIA, Commerce, Defense, Labor, NSC, Office of Joint Chiefs of Staff, Peace Corps, Treasury, and USIA. Attachment: Country Policy Statement, Nepal GROUP 3 Downgraded at 12-year intervals; not automatically declassified. CONFIDENTIAL NSCIG/NEA: SSober :wab. DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL COUNTRY POLICY STATEMENT - NEPAL Contents Page Background 1 United States Objectives 3 United States Strategy 4 A. Options 4 B. Policy Guidelines 6 Political 6 Economic 7 Psychological 7 Security 8 CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 10284 NEPAL COUNTRY POLICY STATEMENT BACKGROUND Kept in isolation by its feudal rulers until the revolution in 1951, Nepal is still one of the most primitive countries in terms of political, social and economic conditions. The single most important fact of life in Nepal's foreign affairs continues to be the small kingdom's geographic situation landlocked between India and Tibet. Its territory is a buffer where the rival interests of China and India impinge and impact. Nepal is resentful of India's attempts at political influence and its almost total dependence on India in economic affairs. About 90 percent of Nepal's foreign trade is with her southern neighbor and India has the largest aid program in the country. Nepal has encouraged friendly relations with China as one means of offsetting the heavy Indian influence. Relations between Nepal and India continue to be very much like those between an adolescent and his parent -- basically compatible, but subject to the occasional emotional out- bursts that accompany the struggle to achieve true independence. By comparison, the Nepalese Government evinces considerably more caution in its relations with China, a studied friend- liness not unmixed with fear. At the same time Nepal has sought other countries' interest and involvement to reinforce its image as an independent state. Nepal's paramount interest is in defending its independence, in its eyes threatened more by Indian economic domination than by any Chinese military move or political activities. Notable highlights in the campaign to build up recognition around the world are Nepal's successful bid for a 1969-71 UN Security Council term and its active participation in meetings on problems of landlocked countries. Recent trade GROUP 3 Downgraded at 12-year intervals; not automatically declassified. CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 2. talks with India offer some hope for improved conditions for Nepalese transit trade. Relations with Communist China, slightly strained at the height of the Cultural Revolution in 1967, have returned to their normal cordial state. Chinese aid has increased to about $7 million annually. Some control has been exerted over the extensive Chinese propaganda activities, and the government is beginning a program for development of the northern border areas in an effort to counter Chinese influence. Aware of the pressures on her from both north and south, Nepal has sought contact with both the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. to offset the influence of her neighbors. The King's visit to the United States in the fall of 1967 and exchanges on aid matters related to this visit have underscored the position of the United States as a friendly but distant and disinterested power helping Nepal maintain its balance and deal with develop- ment problems in which it does not want its neighbors to have a predominant influence. The USSR, the other major power physically represented there, maintains a small aid and a sizeable propaganda presence, primarily as an extension of its Indian policy. Internally, Nepal is entering a new period of political develop- ment. Having firmly established a partyless system of govern- ment based on village councils, in 1968 the King released the former Nepali Congress Party Prime Minister B.P. Koirala after eight years imprisonment. Koirala's release was the key to better relations with the democratic pro-Indian opposition elements. King Mahendra has guided the political scene to a point where accommodation may be possible between his role as absolute monarch and the development of popular, democratic institutions, without political parties as such. At the present time, and particularly while moves to accommodate the democratic elements within the Panchayat system continue, CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 3. the small illegal communist parties of Nepal (right -wing, left-wing and left extremists) pose the only organized threat to the country's internal political stability; fortunately, these parties are partially crippled by their own internal and personality squabbles. Nepal as an economic unit has a few advantages but basically it faces most of the problems of underdeveloped countries around the world, and then some. Nepal's population is overwhelmingly dependent on traditional agriculture for its livelihood, the manufacturing and service industries are in only rudimentary stages, and transport and communications in this mountainous kingdom are grossly inadequate. In addition, Nepal is a land- locked nation dependent on India for transit facilities (as well as for most of its trade), with all the trade expansion problems such a situation engenders. Having started the modern- izing process as late as it did and from such a low base, Nepal is especially handicapped in the essential underpinnings of modernity, such as educated and trained manpower. Although the average Nepalese is among the poorest of Asians, with per capita income standing at roughly $75 per year, some progress has been made during the last fifteen years or so of Nepal's exposure to the outside world. Aware that substantially increased assistance from any aid donor would upset the careful political balance, Nepal endeavors to keep assistance coming from as many sources as possible. India now is the largest donor with a $14 million program, the US program is about $10 million (largely in surplus PL-480 Indian rupees), China's $7 million and the USSR $500,000. A noteworthy arrangement is the military assistance from Israel for paratroop training. UNITED STATES OBJECTIVES Our interest in Nepal stems almost entirely from our larger interest in contributing to the security of the Indian Sub- continent. Our policy aims in India are intended to be the chief beneficiary of our relationship with Nepal in that we seek, as appropriate, to share with India the task of helping Nepal to remain an area of relative calm and order and to prevent its subversion by Communist China. CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 4. Our basic objectives are: 1. The establishment of a politically effective, modernizing Nepalese nation, hopefully increasingly democratic, which is capable of holding its own in the present-day world and contributing its mite to the maintenance of world order. Such a Nepal would work in close cooperation with India on a wide range of practical problems affecting the ultimate security of the Subcontinent. 2. A major corollary to this essentially political aim is the maintenance of a satisfactory rate of economic and social progress which will permit a peaceful and orderly transition of Nepal to a modern state. UNITED STATES STRATEGY Our activities in Nepal are guided by our desire to encourage good Indo-Nepalese relations. We maintain an American presence at a moderate level, on a par with other major powers, and contri- bute to Nepalese development in an unobtrusive manner. A. Options In terms of overall strategy the options open to the United States in Nepal are identifiable primarily in relation to the total size and impact of US programs and presence. Those choices readily available to the United States can be stated generally as: (1) continuation of roughly the present degree of our involvement in Nepal; (2) a phased, judicious reduction in our presence; and (3) revisions of program emphasis by agency in combination with either of the foregoing options. The current United States presence in Nepal encompasses a dozen-officer Embassy; a 60-man, $10 million annual aid program; 200-plus Peace Corps Volunteers; and a three-officer USIS establishment. A careful overall decrease CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 5. of this US presence, if dictated by budgetary or other compelling factors, would not jeopardize the United States' minimal bilateral interest in Nepal, nor, most probably, our more important area interests concerning the future of India. Timing would be important, however, and it would be absolutely essential that care be taken to avoid the appearance of repudiating our past relationships with Nepal. and India as they have evolved over recent years. A fundamental point in this formulation is the fact, pre- viously noted, that Nepal is not an area of priority US policy concerns. India must assume first responsibility for Nepal with respect to the security of the Subcontinent, tempered by Nepal's desire that no neighbor becomes over- involved in its affairs. US aims in this regard are furthered by a responsible presence and demonstrable assistance per se; the precise size and agency combination of involvement, within reasonable bounds, is less important. The extremes of a significantly expanded US presence or abandonment of this presence (or reduction to a very low level) appear unrealistic. The former is not necessary to accomplish our basically political objective in Nepal, and indeed might prove counter-productive. The latter could possibly increase the potentiality for instability in the area. It would be well to avoid the possible political dislocations and policy disorientation in the area that would be attendant upon a perceived significant change in US attitudes toward Nepal. The current US presence, while substantial, is not overwhelming. The size of the Embassy is on a par with other important powers such as India, China and the USSR; the USIS staff is minimal; the large Peace Corps program has been generally successful and well received. (However, the Peace Corps may already be near the limit of Nepalese political and organization absorptive capacity.) USAID/Nepal's staff and program funds, while believed to be in an appro- priate range, are expected in any event to decline in the near term as a result of cutbacks in worldwide aid availabilities. CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 of If extrinsio factors dictate 3 reduced US program and presence in Nepal, such $ reduction could be shared to some excent by all agreeses represented there, but the burden of such CUES 00010 be accepted with least damage to our interests by the AND and Peace Corps programs. B. Policy Guidelines Political 1. We should NAME with the Nonarchy and the present governmental structure, while ondourageing the more liberal Influments to the Dovernment part the society. We should continue contacts vich the various political factions in order to keep informed of their views and activities. 2. We should indicate strough our presence US interest the Napalese efforts to modernize and develop con- tacls with other nacions, and VISA should encourage through the same presence close Indo-Mepolese del aboration on matters of mutual security. B. A visit by a high-ranking US official CO Nepal, fullowing-up Kins Hahandra's 1967 State Fisit, would be in keeplay with OUI political posture. No one of Cabinec cank or higher has visited Nepal officially. in we should continue our support for the in toghway 08 MIL factor in our in collabo. Lan generals of projects. 3. We should del. as walls chat our involvement in Nepal is based on our common Interests and CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL 7. that we support an increasingly responsible role for India in its relations with Nepal. 4. We should encourage Nepal in its present belief that its vital national interests are well served by identifica- tion with forces which support international law and order, and by playing a constructive role in the United Nations and the various specialized agencies. Economic 1. We should continue to support Nepal's developmental efforts at approximately the present level, largely through the provision of rupee capital resources and the assistance of Peace Corps Volunteers. a. We should continue to use Indian rupees accumulated under PL-480 programs in India to finance the local currency costs of our aid and information programs in Nepal. This source of funds, used with the consent of the Government of India, permits us to offer significant economic assistance at moderate cost. b. Should a reduction in AID operations become necessary, the participant training program and on-going projects in agricultural production and education should be accorded the highest priority for funds. 2. We should encourage Indo-Nepalese economic cooperation and foster increased contact between Nepal and the various international organizations in attacking Nepal's long-range developmental problems, especially in terms of needed technical assistance and the training of skilled man- power, but also in terms of financial assistance. Psychological 1. We should utilize the cultural, exchange and information programs to support, as appropriate, our political, CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 623/01/12 CONF 'IDENTIAL 8 economic, and security objectives, emphasizing in particular the compatibility of American-Nepalese interests and the benefits to be derived from economic development within a democratic framework. Security 1. We should encourage Indo-Nepalese military coopera- tion and be prepared, in accordance with the 1964 tripartite arrangement, to consider instituting a program through which Nepal could obtain military equipment which in our judgement is required by Nepal and India is unable to provide. 2. While leaving to India the principal military role, we should continue the limited training in US military schools of qualified Nepalese Army officers. CONF IDENT IAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 1072 nepal May 24, 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR S/S - JOHN WALSH FROM: Jeanne W. Davis SUBJECT: Invitation from King Mahendra to the President to Visit Nepal (S/S 7855) In regard to the invitation from King Mahendra for the President to visit Nepal, the President has authorized Joe Sisco or his deputy to call the Ambassador and reply along the following lines: "The President is grateful for the King's kind invitation. He very much hopes that it may be possible to visit Nepal at some point in his Administration. He has no present plans for travel to South Asia but he will keep the King's invitation very much in mind should such a trip materialize." DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 1012 MEMORANDUM of THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON ACTION CONFIDENTIAL May 22, 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR DR. KISSINGER FROM: Harold H. Saunders Hal SUBJECT: Invitation for the President to Visit Nepal The Nepalese Ambassador has issued an oral invitation for the President to pay a State visit to Nepal. (Tab B) Recommendation: That you send the attached memorandum for the President recommending a gracious oral acknowledgment without commitment. (The President probably should be aware of this but you may feel that you can sign off on the attached yourself.) (Tab A) HAK: You should do this. No wed to send to RN. Mr H approval for RR CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 23, 1969 CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: Henry A. Kissinger SUBJECT: Invitation to Visit Nepal The Ambassador of Nepal has delivered to the State Department a verbal invitation from King Mahendra for you to make a State visit to Nepal. The Ambassador said that a formal invitation would follow if you were able to accept. No timing was suggested. The King has made two State visits to the U.S. in 1960 and 1967, but no senior American official has ever visited Nepal. Obviously there is no way to give this more than a polite response at this point, but a prompt and gracious acknowledgment would be in order. Recommendation: That you authorize Joe Sisco or his deputy to call the Ambassador and reply along the following lines: The President is grateful for the King's kind invitation. He very much hopes that it may be possible to visit Nepal at some point in his administration. He has no present plans for travel to South Asia but he will keep the King's invitation very much in mind should such a trip materialize. Approve HK for Disapprove CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 1072 department OF state Washington, D.C. 20520 7855 May 19, 1969 CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR MR. HENRY A. KISSINGER THE WHITE HOUSE Subject: Invitation to the President from King Mahendra of Nepal Ambassador Sharma of Nepal called on Deputy Assistant Secretary Van Hollen today to deliver a verbal invitation from King Mahendra to President Nixon to make a State Visit to Nepal. The Ambassador said that a formal invitation would follow if the President would be willing to accept. No timing for the visit was indicated. In extending the invitation on behalf of King Mahendra, Ambassador Sharma noted that the King had made two State Visits to the United States, in 1960 and 1967, but no American President or Vice President had ever visited Nepal. The Ambassador referred to the good relations that had always existed between the United States and Nepal and hoped that the President would be able to accept. As far as the Department is aware, the highest ranking member of the Executive Branch ever to visit Nepal was at the Deputy Assistant Secretary level, although a number of Senators and Representatives and one Supreme Court Justice have been there. John P.Walsh John P. Walsh Acting Executive Secretary CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 Billowded 608 5-22-69 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: Henry A. Kissinger SUBJECT: Presidential Message for USIA Pamphlet in Nepal Ambassador Laise in Nepal has requested permission to print the following message from you in a new USIA pamphlet to be published on our aid program in Nepal: "American assistance to Nepal began in 1952, the year Dwight D. Eisenhower was elected President of the United States. I have watched with great satisfaction the part my country has played since then as a friend and partner of Nepal in its development efforts. "I take this opportunity to congratulate His Majesty King Mahendra, His Majesty's Government and the people of Nepal on the advances already made. My fellow Americans and I share Nepal's hopes for progress and prosperity for all its people. From talking with Carol when she was here, we know that she is working hard to make sure that our interest in the small countries does not get lost behind our larger efforts. This is a small gesture but an appropriate one. Recommendation: That you approve the above message. Approve HAK for Rim n n Disapprove HHSaunders :tmt 5/19/69 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 Retiru to Moose THE WHITE house washington April 16, 1969 MEMORANDUM CONFIDENTIAL FOR MR. MOOSE The President will have a full briefing package from Ambassador Mosbacher for this presentation of credentials tomorrow. I have done the attached only in case you still want something from us. As far as I can tell this afternoon, no one is asking us for anything but I don't want to leave you in the lurch. Ital Harold H. Saunders CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON INFORMATION CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: Henry A. Kissinger SUBJECT: Presentation of Credentials by New Nepalese Ambassador--1145 a. m., April 17 Ambassador Kul Shekhar Sharma (cool shake-ar Shar-ma) from Nepal visited the US as a leader grantee in 1953, but you have probably not met him. Point to stress: US interest in Nepal. Point to avoid: Recent US press criticism of King Mahendra. Sharma probably will not raise this. [Los Angeles papers have criticized him for not paying bills during his last visit to the US. Talking points: 1. Your appreciation for the messages he will probably give you from the King and the Prime Minister. You have pleasant memories of your meeting with the King in 1960 and wish him and his new Prime Minister (Bista) success. (It is possible that the greetings will be from Bista's predecessor Thapa.) 2. You look forward to a continuation of warm relations between Nepal and the US. You know that Ambassador Sharma and our Ambassador in Nepal--Carol Laise (Mrs. Ellsworth Bunker) will make a valuable contribution to our relations. You had the pleasure of talking with Ambassador Laise while she was here a couple of weeks ago. 3. We remain interested in Nepal and its economic development. Ambassador Sharma's wide experience in development will be an asset for both countries. CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL - 2 - There are no important outstanding bilateral issues, and Sharma's visit is primarily a formality, so it is unlikely that he will feel it necessary to raise anything substantive. Ambassador Mosbacher will be providing biographical and other material related to this meeting. CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 122 MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON ACTION SECRET April 16, 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR DR. KISSINGER FROM: Richard L. Sneider ther SUBJECT: Presentation of Credentials by Philippine Ambassador Lagdameo - Thursday, April 17 The Department of State has sent you a copy of the substantive briefing memo which it did for the presentation of credentials by Ambassador Lagdameo (Tab B). That memo will be in the briefing package transmitted to the President by Protocol. The suggested talking points are somewhat controversial for a brief presentation of credentials by three Ambassadors together. They also do not take account of some very recent progress in the negotiation of bilateral issues. I attach (Tab A) alternate talking points. RECOMMENDATION: That you sign the memorandum to the President at Tab A. Attachments DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 SECRET 1438 & Saunders 2.Ret. department OF state Washington, D.C. 20520 5199 April 7, 1969 CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR MR. HENRY A. KISSINGER THE WHITE HOUSE Subject: Substantive Briefing Material for Presentation of Credentials to the President by Ambassador Kul Shekhar Sharma of Nepal Enclosed are the substantive briefing materials which will be included in the Chief of Protocol's memorandum to the White House for Ambassador Kul Shekhar Sharma's pre- sentation of credentials to the President. No date has been set for the appointment. Panen John P. Walsh Walker Acting Executive Secretary Enclosures: Tab A - Briefing Memorandum Tab B - Biographic Data Tab C - Country Data Sheet and Background Notes Tab D - Nepalese Foreign Policy Tab E - Ambassador Sharma's Remarks to the President Tab F - The President's Reply DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON INFORMATION SECRET MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: Henry A. Kissinger SUBJECT: Presentation of Credentials by Philippine Ambassador Lagdameo - Thursday, April 17 You may wish to raise the following points: -- You enjoyed your conversation with President Marcos, and look forward to a bilateral relationship of mutual respect and support. -- You repose full confidence in our Charge d'Affaires in Manila, James M. Wilson, Jr. You recognize the importance of the Manila post, however, and are giving careful consideration to the selection of a new Ambassador. Ambassador Lagdameo may possibly take the opportunity to raise certain current economic issues particularly those raised by current Philippine efforts to curb imports to shore up the peso and the Laurel-Langley Agreement. A. Dollar Remittance Program -- Because of its balance of payments problem, the Philippines is making an all-out effort to gain our cooperation in implementing (1) measures which will keep dollars spent by the U.S. Government and by the U.S. military personnel in the Philippines out of the black market and in legal banking channels and (2) procedures which will require Filipino employees of the U.S. Government and its contractors outside the Philippines to repatriate their dollars to legal Philippine banking channels. Suggested Reply -- You understand that progress is being made in negotiations to aid the Philippine Government to keep dollars out of black market channels, and that you understand Philippine concern but hope that the Philippines will keep in mind the importance of working closely together on specific actions affecting both our interests. DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 SECRET - 2 - B. Trade Negotiations (Laurel-Langley Agreement) -- - Until recently, the Filipinos were pressing hard for an early renegotiation of our current trade agreement, which expires in 1974. During the recent visit of President Marcos to Washington, however, Marcos told Secretary Rogers that he hoped this issue could be carried over to 1970. Publicity regarding U.S. reluctance to extend and broaden tariff preferences for Philippine articles could be harmful to Marcos during this Philippine Presidential election year. Secretary Rogers agreed that the United States would not initiate action on this matter during 1969. Suggested Reply -- Should Ambassador Lagdameo raise it, you might confirm that the U.S. Government, for its part, is giving the matter full consideration and is prepared to hold the Laurel-Langley problem in abeyance until 1970 if desired by the Philippine Government. Attachments SECRET DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON OBE time now all Way heche you Caus 10 know sauthy more an this - 1 so, let me Know I handle 43/1/69 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 Alice (Pat inform State not possible due to funeral and Presidents absence from city - Dick Moose I think we have to 90 back to S/S and - say this is not possible because of (a) The funeral and (1) the President's plan to be ant 1 town The rest of This week. In fact, and Bunker may bring Carol in on his own. Hal Sundus DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 1235 Sneided department OF state 2. Ret. Washington, D.C. 20520 4489 March 27, 1969 CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR MR. HENRY A. KISSINGER THE WHITE HOUSE Subject: Request for an Appointment with the President for Carol C. Laise, Ambassador to Nepal Ambassador Laise has requested an appointment with the President during her consultation. King Mahendra asked her to convey his personal greetings to the President, whom he met during a State Visit in 1960. Ambassador Laise would also like to discuss Nepal's relations with the United States and its membership on the UN Security Council this year. Except for Wednesday and Thursday, April 2 and 3, when she will accompany Ambassador Bunker to New York, Ambassador Laise will be in Washington until April 5. A biographic sketch of Ambassador Laise and back- ground information on Nepal are enclosed. cld. 1/2/69 5/5, 4:30 andrea John P.Walsh John P. Walsh Acting Executive Secretary Enclosures: above 1. Biographic Sketch of Ambassador Laise 2. Nepalese Foreign Policy 3. Country Data Sheet and Background Notes on Nepal CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 AMBASSADOR CAROL C. LAISE Carol C. Laise was born in Virginia in 1917 but grew up in West Virginia. After graduating from American Uni- versity with an A.B. degree in political science in 1938, she attended graduate school there for two years and then entered Federal service in 1940. During World War II she worked in positions of increasing responsibility for the Civil Service Commission, and after the war worked with UNRRA in London. She joined the Department in 1948 in the Bureau of United Nations Affairs and became a Foreign Service officer in 1955. She served in New Delhi from 1956 to 1961 as First Secretary (Political) and returned to the United States to take the Senior Seminar in Foreign Policy (1961- 1962). Miss Laise served as Deputy Director for South Asian Affairs from 1962 until 1965 when she became Director. In the re- organization of the Department in 1966 she became Country Director for India, Ceylon, Nepal, and the Maldive Islands. She was appointed Ambassador to Nepal in October 1966 and promoted to Career Minister in 1968. Miss Laise married U.S. Ambassador Ellsworth Bunker in Kathmandu on January 3, 1967. Her brother, Frederic S. Laise, is Vice-President of the American Red Cross. She is a winner of the Federal Woman's Award (1965) and of the Department's Commendable Service Award (1960). DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL NEPALESE FOREIGN POLICY The single most important fact of life in Nepal's foreign affairs continues to be the small kingdom's geographic situation landlocked between India and Tibet, making its territory a place where the rival interests of China and India compete. Accordingly, its chief role in regional affairs continues to be that of a buffer, 500 miles long, between the Tibetan Plateau and the Gangetic Plain - a role which apparently is still acceptable to both China and India. Geography dictates Nepalese economic dependence on India, a dependence the Nepalese assiduously seek to lessen through the pre- sence and help of other nations. China is the principal counter- weight but a dangerous out, so the Nepalese also look to the United Nations, the United States, the USSR and the United Kingdom, as well as to smaller countries such as Israel and Switzerland. As a result, Nepal has followed a consistent policy of non-alignment. Nepal's basic orientation is toward India and the West, rather than the Sino-Soviet bloc, although Nepal has accepted economic assistance from both the USSR and China. Nepal looks to India, Israel and the West for military assistance. A member of the United Nations since 1955, Nepal has voted rather consistently with the Afro-Asian group. Although generally abstaining on East-West issues, Nepal has consistently opposed the U.S. position on the Tibetan issue and on the question of represen- tation of Communist China. As a Security Council member for the 1969-1971 term, Nepal moves into the international limelight and may have to take positions which could offend powers on which it depends for both a flow of aid and support of its neutralist foreign policy. By its strong stand in defense of Czech freedom in August 1968, however, Nepal showed that it is prepared to run some political risk in defense of a principle vital to itself as a small country. On the Middle East, Nepal believes that a lasting peace is possible only through negotiations which recognize the need for respect of the sovereignty of all the nations in the region, re- habilitation of the displaced indigenous population and ending of the state of belligerency. Nepal fully supports the Security Council resolution of November 22, 1967. On Viet-Nam, Nepal supports a peaceful settlement based on the 1954 Geneva Agreements. Privately, Nepalese leaders have expressed understanding of the U.S. role in Viet-Nam, but their powerful neighbors have considerable influence on public Nepalese foreign policy pronouncements. CONFIDENTIAL NEA/INC - March 6, 1969 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 NEPAL Capital: Kathmandu Population: 10,600,000 (1968 est.) RULER: King Mahendra Bir Bikram Shah Deva Ascended throne in 1955. PRIME MINISTER: Surya Bahadur Thapa FOREIGN MINISTER: Gehendra Bahadur Rajbhandari GOVERNMENT: Nepal is a near-absolute monarchy with an appointed Council of Ministers and an indirectly-elected legislature. PARTIES: All political parties are banned. ECONOMY: Gross National Product: $770,000,000 (1968 est.) GNP per capita: $72 About 90% of the population is engaged in agricultural pursuits, and the country is technically 100% self- sufficient in food on the basis of a very minimum diet. What few industries there are, are quite small scale and consist largely of jute products, sugar refining, rice and oilseed milling, and textiles. Tourism is a large foreign exchange earner as is the service of Nepalese nationals in the British and Indian armies. Nepal exports food grains, jute, timber, herbs, and hides. U.S. REPRESENTATION: Kathmandu (E) Ambassador Carol C. Laise (Mrs. Ellsworth Bunker) CONFIDENTIAL DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 1235 K of Background Notes STATE UNITED NEPAL / STATES of Population: 10 million country from a number of mountain states. The Capital: Kathmandu country was frequently called the Gurkha Kingdom, and when recruitment of Nepalese soldiers for the The Kingdom of Nepal, lying along the southern British Indian Army began in the early 1800's, the slopes of the Himalayas, has the shape of a rec- British called them "Gurkhas." The name remained tangle roughly 500 miles long and 100 miles wide. and became world famous due to the bravery of Nepal is landlocked and has two neighbors-India Nepalese fighters in the First and Second World to the south and Communist Chinese-controlled Wars. Today Nepal permits both India and Britain Tibet to the north. to recruit Nepalese nationals for their armies. The mountainous country has three distinctly After 1800 the heirs of Prithvi Narayan Shah different physical regions, each running laterally proved unable to maintain firm political control the length of the kingdom. In the south, a flat, over Nepal, and a period of internal turmoil ensued. fertile strip of territory called the Terai is part Stability was restored in the 1840's when the Rana of the Ganges Plain and shares the extreme heat family gained power, entrenched itself through of India. About a third of Nepal's 10 million in- hereditary Prime Ministers, and reduced the mon- habitants live in the Terai. Central Nepal, known arch to a figurehead. as the hill country, is crisscrossed by the lower A tightly centralized autocracy, the Rana ad- ranges of the Himalayas and by swift-flowing moun- ministration pursued a conscious policy of isolating tain rivers. The majority of Nepal's population Nepal from external influences. This policy helped lives in this temperate region, which also contains Nepal maintain its national independence during the Kathmandu Valley, focal point of the nation's the colonial era, but at the same time left it in political life. The Himalayas, the world's highest an economic backwater. mountains, run the length of northern Nepal. This Democratic currents set in motion by the inde- high mountain area has few people and frigid, pendence movement in neighboring India had their arctic winters. impact on Nepal, and opposition to Rana rule grew The unique, double-peaked shape of Nepal's flag in the 1930's and 1940's. In 1950-51, shortly after symbolizes the country's mountains. The red India became independent, a popular revolution triangles are edged with blue and carry white toppled the Ranas, restored King Tribhuvan to emblems representing the moon and the sun. power, and paved the way for a non-Rana to become Prime Minister. The decade of the 1950's saw a THE PEOPLE period of quasi-constitutional rule during which the monarch, assisted by leaders of the fledgling political The Nepalese are descendants of three major parties, governed the country. At times Prime Min- migrations from India, Tibet, and Central Asia. isters from these parties were in office and repre- The people are divided into many tribes (called sented a wide spectrum of views. During other "castes" in Nepal) such as the Gurungs and Magars periods the throne ruled directly. King Tribhuvan in the west; Tamangs and Newars in the center; was succeeded after his death in 1955 by his son, Bhotias in the north; Rais, Limbus, and Sherpas in King Mahendra, who is the present ruler. the east; and Tharus in the south. Ethnically and Throughout the decade efforts were made to culturally, the Nepalese in the Terai and central frame a constitution for the country that would hills have close links with India, and the majority establish a representative form of government, of the people are Hindus. There is a fair-sized presumably patterned on a modified British model. Buddhist minority (the Buddha was born in what is In early 1959 such a constitution was issued by the now Nepal). The inhabitants of northern Nepal King, and shortly afterward the first democratic bordering Tibet are mostly Buddhist. elections were held for a national assembly. The isolation of the country has made the The Nepali Congress Party, a moderate social- progress of education extremely slow, and only ist group, gained a substantial victory and its about 5 percent of the people can read and write. leader, B. P. Koirala, was called upon to form a The official language is Nepali, which is derived government and serve as Prime Minister. from Sanskrit, but more than 30 languages are In December 1960 King Mahendra dismissed the used in Nepal. Koirala government, suspended the constitution, and resumed direct rule. The King charged the Nepali Net HISTORY Congress government with corruption, misuse of Nepal was founded in the latter half of the 18th power, and an inability to maintain law and order century when Prithvi Narayan Shah, the ruler of throughout the country. King Mahendra declared the small principality of Gurkha, forged a unified that Nepal was not yet ready for Western DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 80 Taklakhar 82 84 86 88 30 Simikot 30 IIPM CHIN A Tradum Baitadi Bajang Raga Tsangpo Silgarhi-Doti Kaman Jumla Tanakpur Matsang Lhatse of Dzong Mustang Jongkha Dzong Dailekh Dhangarhi Jãjarkot Kailãli Kingri Bherry Dzong Girang Dzong Sallyana INDTA Baglung Pokhara Rasua Piuthãn Garhi Nepalganj Nuwãkot Nyalam Dzong 28 Riri Bazar 28g Shahjahänpur Kodãri of Käli Gurkha Nawakot Chautara Tansing o Dolakha Taulihawa KATMANDU Arun NEPAL o Bhimphedi Okhaldhunga Nautanwa Taplejung Railroad Amlekhganj Bhikhna Thori Road or track Bhojpur Siswa Dhankuta Bäzär O.Birganj Ilam 0 25 50 75 Raxaul 100 Miles Malangwa Sun o 25 50 75 100 Kilometers CODIA Gandak Kosi "Janakpur Gorakhpur INDIA / Biratnagar Jaynagar 80 84 86 Jogbani 88 53626 3-67 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 parliamentary institutions and needed a democratic about $70, it has made noteworthy progress in the political system closer to Nepalese traditions. To past decade. meet this need the King initiated a partyless system A countrywide education program is under way. of "panchayat," or village council democracy. A university has been established. Malaria has been brought under control in a large and previously uninhabitable area. The capital city of Kathmandu GOVERNMENT now is linked to India and Tibet by road and to other towns in Nepal by radio. Several hydro- The King exercises broad powers over Nepal's electric projects have been completed. Some small "panchayat" system of government. The panchayat industries are being developed to process agri- system draws its theoretical inspiration from the cultural products and manufacture items for local traditional local government institution found in consumption such as cotton textiles, matches, cig- parts of Nepal-the village panchayat. arettes, and shoes. A system of internal finance and Under the 1962 Constitution four tiers of govern- public administration has been established. A start ment were established: village or town panchayats; has been made toward a rational exploitation of district (county) panchayats; zonal (provincial) pan- Nepal's three major economic resources-forests, chayats; and, at the apex, a national panchayat hydroelectric potential, and tourism. which is the national legislature. Members of the Agriculture remains Nepal's principal economic village or town panchayats are elected by universal activity, providing more than two-thirds of the suffrage. The district, zonal, and national pan- country's income. Rice is the main food crop. In chayat members are elected indirectly by the pan- recent years jute has been cultivated as a com- chayats immediately beneath them in the hierarchical mercial crop. order. Nepal's foreign trade, almost entirely with India, The Council of Ministers is the executive arm has grown in recent years as the pace of development of the Government and gives policy advice to the has accelerated. Nepal's exports are primarily King. The Ministers are appointed by the King agricultural products and timber; its imports are from the membership of the National Panchayat. largely manufactured goods, with textiles the largest Elections were held in 1963 and the new na- single item. tional legislature (the National Panchayat) held its Nepal is seeking to lay the basis for a modern opening session in April 1963. One-half of the economy-a task made difficult because of the seats in the National Panchayat became vacant in country's rugged terrain and its recent emergence 1967 under the provision for staggered 6-year from a traditional feudal society. Maintenance of terms of office for Panchayat members. Elections a sufficient rate of economic progress to keep pace were held in April 1967 to fill these seats. with the rising aspirations of the population is now, In the past few years the Government has in- and is likely to continue to be, a primary task for itiated a number of significant social reforms, Nepal. including a program of land reform and a modern- ization of the legal code removing legal sanction for caste discrimination. However, Nepal still FOREIGN RELATIONS faces challenging political and social tasks in order to develop stable governmental institutions that can As a small landlocked country wedged between meet the needs of a modern society. The Govern- two larger and far stronger powers, Nepal's pri- ment also faces the problem of reforming social mary foreign policy problems concern Communist institutions and customs SO that the society itself China and India. Nepal has sought to develop and can keep abreast of political and economic changes maintain a policy of close and officially friendly under way. relations with both. During the Sino-Indian border crisis in 1962 Nepal adopted an official posture of neutrality toward the border dispute, and limited A ECONOMY its public statements to expressions of hope that the two countries could settle their differences When the modern era began in 1951, Nepal had peacefully. On international issues, Nepal has fol- virtually no schools, no hospitals, no roads, no lowed a nonalined and neutralist policy. Nepal telecommunications, no electric power, no industry, generally votes with the Afro-Asian group at the and no civil service. Nepal had a subsistence United Nations. agrarian economy. Nepal formally established relations with Com- Owing to efforts by the Government of Nepal munist China in 1956, when the two countries signed and substantial amounts of external assistance, a treaty of friendship. At that time Nepal relin- principally from India and the United States, a quished certain extraterritorial rights it had gained start has been made toward laying the foundations in Tibet as a result of mid-19th century wars. The for economic growth. Nepal completed a 3-year status of the undemarcated 650-mile-long Sino- plan (1962-65) which stressed fundamental economic Nepalese border was settled by a 1960 treaty. needs. The current 5-year plan (1966-1970) calls The Chinese Communists have promised Nepal Net for the expenditure of $329 million. While Nepal large amounts of economic aid. However, a motor- remains one of the least developed countries in able road from Kathmandu to the Tibetan border is Asia, with an estimated per capita income of the principal major project that has materialized. 3 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 Because of strong cultural, linguistic, religious, has several programs in Nepal which assist develop- and economic ties, Nepal's associations with India ment in education, agriculture, forestry, and pan- are much closer than those with China. Geographi- chayats. cally Nepal occupies a key position in the Himalayan The United States has given limited military defense perimeter of the Indo-Pakistan subcon- assistance to the Royal Nepalese Army. The United tinent. India has recognized Nepal's strategic im- Kingdom and India are also providing military aid portance and has made clear that it will not coun- to Nepal. tenance any encroachments on Nepalese territorial integrity. U.S. policy toward Nepal has these objectives: Despite these close links, the Indo-Nepalese re- 1. Support for the maintenance of Nepalese lationship has not been entirely smooth. After King independence and territorial integrity and the de- Mahendra resumed power in 1960, friction developed over Indian criticism of his action and over raids velopment of democratic political institutions. against Nepal by exiles whom the Nepalese charged 2. Support for Nepal's effort to develop her were using India as a safe haven. Since the Chinese human and social resources through selected pro- attack on India in late 1962, both India and Nepal have grams of economic aid and technical assistance. worked toward overcoming previous difficulties. India has provided Nepal with substantial eco- 3. Support for the broadening of political rela- nomic assistance, which currently totals more than tions between Nepal and other free-world countries $14 million annually. Indian projects cover a wide and encouragement to other free-world countries spectrum of activities, including roadbuilding, to increase their participation in programs of health, hydroelectric dams, and industrial projects. economic assistance to Nepal. Nepal and the United Kingdom have maintained various forms of representation for over 150 years, and their relations today are friendly. Nepalese PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS nationals continue to serve in Gurkha units of the British Army, and Britain maintains a Gurkha re- King cruiting station in eastern Nepal. King Mahendra paid a state visit to Britain in 1960, and Queen Mahendra Bir Bikram Shah Deva Elizabeth visited Nepal in 1961. The Soviet Union has had a resident Embassy in Nepal since 1959 and has provided Nepal with Council of Ministers some economic assistance, largely in the indus- trial sector. The Soviets have agreed to build Surya Bahadur Thapa-Prime Minister; Finance; a 75-mile-long road in southern Nepal. King Palace Affairs; General Administration Mahendra paid a state visit to the U.S.S.R. in 1958, Kirti Nidhi Bista-Deputy Prime Minister; Foreign and President Voroshilov visited Nepal in 1960. Affairs; Economic Planning Giri Prasad Burhathoki-Defense Rajeshwar Devkota-Food and Agriculture; Land U.S. POLICY Reform Surendra Bahadur Basnyat-Law; Justice; Education Gehendra B. Rajbhandari-Home and Panchayat; In- Since their formal establishment in 1947, U.S.- formation and Broadcasting Nepal relations have been friendly. A resident U.S. Embassy was opened in 1959, and King Mahendra paid a state visit to the United States in 1960. Our Ministers of State policy of assisting less-developed countries has corresponded with Nepal's own desires to build its Daya Nidhi Sharma-Forests national economy and develop its political and Gyanendra Bahadur Karki-Power and Irrigation social institutions. Gunjeshwari Prasad Singh-Industry and Commerce Bishnu Kumar Tumbahamphe-Health The United States has provided approximately Rudra Prasad Giri-Transport and Communication $110 million worth of economic assistance since the aid program commenced in Nepal in 1951. About half of the aid has been in dollars and half Other Officials in Indian rupees which have come from food sales to India under Public Law 480. Nagendra Prasad Rijal-Chairman of the National U.S. aid, which now runs about $10 million Panchayat annually, helps to provide for basic economic and Gen. Surendra B. Shah-Commander in Chief of social needs such as rural development, education, the Army health, communications, forest development, small Bhagbati Prasad Singh-Chief Justice industry, and the development of local self-govern- Maj. Gen. P. B. Khatri-Ambassador to the United ment institutions. In addition, the Peace Corps States 4 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 The Kingdom of Nepal maintains an Embassy Hagen, Toni, Nepal, the Kingdom in the Himalayas, in the United States at 2131 Leroy Place, Washington, Bern, Kummerley and Frey, Calcutta, and New D.C. 20008. Delhi, Oxford Book and Stationery Co., 1960. Jain, Girilal, India Meets China in Nepal, Bombay, PRINCIPAL U.S. OFFICIALS Asia Publishing House, 1959. Joshi, Bhuwanhal, and Rose, Leo E., Democratic Innovations in Nepal, Berkeley, University of Ambassador-Carol C. Laise California Press, 1966. Deputy Chief of Mission-Harry G. Barnes, Jr. Karan and Jenkins, The Himalayan Kingdoms: Bhu- Director, USAID Mission-John Benz tan, Sikkim, and Nepal, Princeton, D. van Nostrand Public Affairs Officer, USIS-George E. Miller Co., Inc., 1963. Peace Corps Director-George Zeidenstein Karan and Jenkins, Nepal-A Physical and Cultural Defense Attache-Lt. Col. Kenneth F. Jackson Geography, Lexington, University of Kentucky Administrative Officer-Robert J. Jackson Press, 1960. Economic-Commercial Officer-Henry E. Mattox Landon, Perceval, Nepal, 2 vols., London, Con- Consular Officer-Joseph Pauley stable and Co., 1928. Levi, Sylvain, Le Nepal: Etude Historique d'un Royaume Hindou, Paris, Ernest Leroux, 1905-08. The United States maintains an Embassy in Northey, W. Brook, and Morris, C. J., The Gurkhas, Nepal at Kathmandu. Their Manners, Customs and Country, London, John Lane, 1928. Regmi, Mahesh C., Land Tenure and Taxation in BIBLIOGRAPHY Nepal, Berkeley, Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1963-65. Constitution of Nepal, Report of the Decentral- Shaha, Rishikesh, Heroes and Builders of Nepal, ization Commission, Kathmandu, Department of London, Oxford University Press, 1965. Publicity, His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Shrestha, Amrit Man, Problems of Nepalese Econ- 1965. omy, published by author, c/o American Embassy, Gupta, Anirudha, Politics in Nepal, Bombay, Allied Kathmandu, 1964. Publishers, and London, George Allen and Unwin, Tuker, Sir Francis, Gorkha, the Story of the Gurkhas Ltd., 1964. of Nepal, London, Constable and Co., 1957. PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OTHER OFFICIALS King Lalit Chand-Chairman of the National Mahendra Bir Bikram Shah Deva Panchayat COUNCIL OF MINISTERS Bhagvati Prasad Singh-Chief Justice General Surendra Bahadur Shah- Prime Minister Surya Bahadur Thapa: Commander in Chief of the Army Palace Affairs; General Administration; Kul Shekhar Sharma-Ambassador- Home-Panchayat designate to the United States Giri Prasad Burhathoki: Defense Maj. General Padma Bahadur Khatri- Surendra Bahadur Basnyat: Finance: Ambassador to the U.S. and Permanent Industry and Commerce Representative to the UN Gehendra Bahadur Rajbhandari: Foreign Affairs; Education Rudra Prasad Giri: Land Reform; Food and Agriculture Ministers of State PRINCIPAL U.S. OFFICIALS Nav Raj Subedi-Home Panchayat Ambassador-Carol C. Laise (Mrs. Ellsworth Bishnu Kumar Tumbahamphe-Water Resources Bunker) and Power Deputy Chief of Mission-Davis Eugene Basudev Dhungana-Law and Justice Boster Bishwa Nath Agrawal-Information and Director, USAID Mission-Carter C. Ide Broadcasting Public Affairs Officer, USIS-Fentress Gardne: Lok Pratap Singh Bisht-Forests Peace Corps Director-Bruce Morgan Netra Bikram Thapa-Health Defense Attache-Lt. Col. William Stites Rabindra Nath Sharma-General Administration Administrative Officer-Edwin H. Mott Nain Bahadur Swanr Land Reform Economic-Commercial Officer-Henry E. Mattox Singha Dhoj Khadga-Public Works, Communication Consular Officer-David Harr and Transport DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 susp id MEMORANDUM ret'd Corignot as THE WHITE HOUSE of 4/16) WASHINGTON LIMITED OFFICIAL USE Thursday, March 13, 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT THROUGH: Dwight L. Chapin FROM: Henry A. Kissinger SUBJECT: Farewell Call by Nepalese Ambassador The Nepalese Ambassador here is moving to New York to devote full time to his job as Nepal's Permanent Representative to the UN. Since December 1964, he has held both posts concurrently, but Nepal has just begun a two-year term as a member of the UN Security Council so the New York job will be more demanding. State recommends that you receive the Ambassador for a farewell call. The normal rule of thumb has been to arrange such calls only for those ambassadors who have served here five years or longer. Although Ambassador Khatri has been here for only a little over four years, State believes a little special attention to a new member of the potentially hostile Security Council would be useful preventive medicine. Were it not for this UN angle, State would not suggest you see him. Your decision depends on a general judgment about how much of your time you wish to devote to this sort of tactical purpose. There is no question that this would be marginally useful and might even help Charlie Yost sway a Security Council vote one day. But this sort of demand on your time could mushroom, and it is always hard to cut back. Recommendation: That you agree to see him for ten minutes unless you sense that this kind of pressure on your time threatens to get out of hand. I'll see him Prefer not to LIMITED OFFICIAL USE DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF PROTOCOL March 3, 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR MR. DWIGHT L. CHAPIN THE WHITE HOUSE Subject: Request for appointment with the President to reœive departing Ambassador Khatri of Nepal for a courtesy farewell call. Ambassador Khatri presented credentials as the Nepalese Ambassador on December 3, 1964. Therefore, he has served in Washington for over four years. Although requests generally are limited to five years or more service for the purpose of farewell calls, the reasons set forth in Assistant Secretary Sisco's memorandum would seem to justify one in this instance (Sisco memorandum and biography on Ambassador Khatri attached). If the President agrees to receive Ambassador Khatri, please inform me of the scheduled time and date. I, in turn, will advise the Ambassador and a Protocol Officer will be present to accompany him to the President. Emil Mosbacher, Jr. Attachments: 1. Memorandum from Assistant Secretary sisco, NEA 2. Biographic information on Ambassador Khatri DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 department OF state Washington, D.C. 20520 LIMITED OFFICIAL USE FEB 24 1969 TO : S/CPR - Ambassador Mosbacher FROM : NEA - Joseph J. Sisco JP SUBJECT: Farewell Call on the President by the Nepalese Ambassador Nepalese Ambassador Major General Padma Bahadur Khatri has requested an appointment for a farewell call on the President. Ambassador Khatri has served concurrently as Nepalese Ambassador to the United States and Permanent Representative to the United Nations since December 1964. He leaves his Washington assignment this month to handle their UN office exclusively. Nepal became a member of the Security Council January 1 for a two-year term. Under the rotation schedule Ambassador Khatri will be President of the Security Council in April. We believe it would be desirable for the President to have an opportunity for a brief meeting with Ambassador Khatri. We recommend that specific substantive matters not be discussed. We see the benefits of a farewell call as an opportunity to remind the Nepalese we are interested in their actions on the Council, and to give the Ambassador a chance for personal contact with the President. Enclosure: Biographic note Clearances: NEA - Mr. Handley NEA/INC - Mr. Van IO/UNP - Mr. Long LIMITED OFFICIAL USE E703 NEA/INC:EFO Brien:cab 2/18/69 X 2625 DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 LIMITED OFFICIAL USE 2 Ambassador Khatri's successor, Ambassador-designate Kul Shekhar Sharma, is expected to arrive in Washington about March 1st. It would be helpful if an appointment with the President for Ambassador Khatri could be scheduled soon after the President's return from Europe, so that an appointment for Ambassador Sharma to present his credentials could be scheduled without too much delay after his arrival. A recent biographic note on Ambassador Khatri is enclosed. LIMITED OFFICIAL USE DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 CONFIDENTIAL KHATRI, Padma Bahadur NEPAL Ambassador to the United States Major General Padma Bahadur Khatri is considered a highly competent and loyal civil servant of Nepal. He entered Nepalese civilian service after a long military career in which he attained the rank of Major General. His service included combat with the Allied forces in Assam and Burma in World War II. He is proud of his military career and the fact that he advanced through his own efforts rather than through family and political connections. Before becoming Ambassador to the United States in December 1964, Ambassador Khatri served as Defense Secretary and Foreign Secretary in the Nepalese Government. He is also Nepal's Permanent Representative to the United Nations and Ambassador to Chile, Argentina and Canada. On June 11, 1968 King Mahendra honored him with the Supradipta Manyavara Nepal-Tara (First Class), one of the highest Nepalese decorations. Before coming to the United States, Ambassador Khatri reportedly had no well-formulated ideology, although he often said he would hate to live in a Communist country. Since coming here he has developed a sympathy for, and understanding of, the United States and some of its problems. In particular, without agreeing with United States policy towards Viet-Nam, he has expressed understanding of our difficulties and of the value to Nepal of our effort there. In addition to comprehension of the threat from China, the Ambassador shares the usual fear of India. Ambassador Khatri was born in Kathmandu in 1915 and belongs to the influential Chhetri caste. He has a B.S. degree from Patna University in India, and in 1946 attended the British military staff college at Quetta (now in Pakistan). DECLASSIFIED E.O. 13526, Section 3.5 PER RAC REVIEW 9/24/2005 CONFIDENTIAL By UHS NARA, Date 4/26/2012 GROUP 3 Downgraded at 12 year intervals; not automatically declassified. [pp. 1 of 3] DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 KHATRI CONFIDENTIAL 2. General Khatri joined the Royal Nepalese Army in 1935 and is the seventh generation of his family to make the army a career. Following World War II he served from 1947 to 1949 as military attache in London and during the UN General Assemblies in 1948 and 1949 was an observer for Nepal. He served in Malaya from 1950 to 1951 as Nepalese liaison officer with the British Brigade of Gurkhas. In 1959 he became director of military operations at RNA headquarters and in 1960 was promoted to Major General and made Quartermaster General of the Army. From 1960 to 1963, as chairman of the Sino-Nepalese Boundary Commission, he was a tough bargainer with the Chinese and became well acquainted with them. In addition to that duty, in April 1961 he was named Defense Secretary and in December 1962 became concurrently Foreign Secretary. The military background is apparent in Khatri's personality. A parade ground voice, a degree of efficiency greater than that of many Nepalese, and an understanding of loyalty and obligation are some of his more notable charac- teristics. As a military man, he is scornful of politics which he calls "a dirty business" and feels that most politicians are only out for personal gain. While the Ambassador can be reserved and uncommunicative with new acquaintances, when he warms up, he can be a good conversationalist. He is sensitive, however, that he be paid the respect his office deserves. He speaks excellent English, has a good memory, well-ordered mind, a quick wit and a well-developed sense of humor. Quick to anger, he is equally quick to appreciate a personal kindness shown to him. A moderately orthodox Hindu who abstains only from eating beef, Ambassador Khatri enjoys his Scotch, likes to play bridge. A keen observer of world affairs, he is well read, particularly in military history. Personal hobbies include horseback riding and hunting. Ambassador Khatri is married and has three sons and a daughter. The oldest son attended CONFIDENTIAL [pp. 1 of 3] DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 KHATRI CONFIDENTIAL 3. American University until recently and another son is studying aeronautical engineering in Florida. His youngest and perhaps favorite son (age 14) he hopes will follow a military career. The Khatris' daughter is an attractive girl who has taken very much to American dress and ways. CONFIDENTIAL Cpp. 3 of 3] DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526 DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF PROTOCOL March 3, 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR MR. DWIGHT L. CHAPIN THE WHITE HOUSE Subject: Request for appointment with the President to receive departing Ambassador Khatri of Nepal for a courtesy farewell call. Ambassador Khatri presented credentials as the Nepalese Ambassador on December 3, 1964. Therefore, he has served in Washington for over four years. Although requests generally are limited to five years or more service for the purpose of farewell calls, the reasons set forth in Assistant Secretary Sisco's memorandum would seem to justify one in this instance (Sisco memorandum and biography on Ambassador Khatri attached). If the President agrees to receive Ambassador Khatri, please inform me of the scheduled time and date. I, in turn, will advise the Ambassador and a Protocol Officer will be present to accompany him to the President. Emil Mosbacher, Jr. Attachments: 1. Memorandum from Assistant Secretary SISCO, NEA 2. Biographic information on Ambassador Khatri DECLASSIFIED pursuant to review under E.O. 13526