Ask the Scholar
Page 8 of 56
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Prof. Doty/Kissinger
- 2-
9:50 a. m.
9/12/70
D: When I ask them for a move of insincerity, they have only the MIRV
deployment and SS-9
.
K: They have been ? ? ? ? ? of 30
.
D: He means the Aug. 3 blows.
K: There was none. It was weather we didn't fly. We picked them up in
June but it must have started in March. If they have only said it was halted (?)
we would have fallen all over ourselves. What should we have done?
D: I would have said hold up MIRV in June.
K: If they said stop SS-9 if you stop MIRV, they would have had a case.
D: It's too much after the fact.
K: They refuse to discuss MIRV. In any context.
D: The most we can do is get these two simple things across.
K: The thing you have to get across XXX to them is they had a unique opportunity
but they are on the verge of blowing it. We were willing to go very, very far.
D: They have one new fellow whasex who is very much involved on nuclear
things.
K: Your impression is that they are very tough.
D: At Pugwash, it is better than I expected. And we will have axward full
day in Cambridge where we can talk mar e.
K: SALT is not a big problem. They made private approaches to us that
were more restrictive than what you should thought was restrictive. Why
couldn't Dobrynin come to me and say it was too restrictive?
D: They wanted technology and it took precedence. Was the
text a month ago interesting?
K: I will look into it immediately.
D: You are going to be very busy next Wed. Mon. or Tues. we should talk
about Millionshchikov.
K: I will try to have a good talk with him,. . It's a big lunch. Since I trust
him more than some of my own colleagues, it's not where I will talk.
Page data
- Page
- 8
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- c4371adfe701aae7
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 498693795
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "498693795",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693795",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "September 12-17, 1970 [1 of 2]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693795",
"collections": [
"National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
"Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 56,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "498693795",
"label": "September 12-17, 1970 [1 of 2]",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693795"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "498693795",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693795",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "September 12-17, 1970 [1 of 2]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693795",
"collections": [
"National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
"Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 56,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693795",
"naId": 498693795,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 8,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-06-09-008.jpg",
"mediaId": "c4371adfe701aae7",
"ocrText": "Prof. Doty/Kissinger\n- 2-\n9:50 a. m.\n9/12/70\nD: When I ask them for a move of insincerity, they have only the MIRV\ndeployment and SS-9\n.\nK: They have been ? ? ? ? ? of 30\n.\nD: He means the Aug. 3 blows.\nK: There was none. It was weather we didn't fly. We picked them up in\nJune but it must have started in March. If they have only said it was halted (?)\nwe would have fallen all over ourselves. What should we have done?\nD: I would have said hold up MIRV in June.\nK: If they said stop SS-9 if you stop MIRV, they would have had a case.\nD: It's too much after the fact.\nK: They refuse to discuss MIRV. In any context.\nD: The most we can do is get these two simple things across.\nK: The thing you have to get across XXX to them is they had a unique opportunity\nbut they are on the verge of blowing it. We were willing to go very, very far.\nD: They have one new fellow whasex who is very much involved on nuclear\nthings.\nK: Your impression is that they are very tough.\nD: At Pugwash, it is better than I expected. And we will have axward full\nday in Cambridge where we can talk mar e.\nK: SALT is not a big problem. They made private approaches to us that\nwere more restrictive than what you should thought was restrictive. Why\ncouldn't Dobrynin come to me and say it was too restrictive?\nD: They wanted technology and it took precedence. Was the\ntext a month ago interesting?\nK: I will look into it immediately.\nD: You are going to be very busy next Wed. Mon. or Tues. we should talk\nabout Millionshchikov.\nK: I will try to have a good talk with him,. . It's a big lunch. Since I trust\nhim more than some of my own colleagues, it's not where I will talk."
}