Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Source Description
This file contains:
LKF notes on meeting at Holmes Tuttle residence. 8pgs. [Report], 7/8/1971
John Price to The President re: Congressional race against Lester Woliff. 2 pgs. [Letter], 4/13/1972
RN to Langhorne Washburn re: Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. 1 pg [Memo], 7/20/1972
Colson to The President re: Democrats for Nixon. 3 pgs. [Memo], 7/12/1972
Herge to MacGregor through Magruder re: Governor Bartlett's Invitation to Governor Reagan. 4 pgs with attachments. [Memo], 8/4/1972
Dean to The President re: Pennsylvania Certification Requirement. 4 pgs with attachments. [Memo], 9/20/1972
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
26128307
label
WHSF: Returned, 72-2
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26128307
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Returned, 72-2
description
This file contains:
LKF notes on meeting at Holmes Tuttle residence. 8pgs. [Report], 7/8/1971
John Price to The President re: Congressional race against Lester Woliff. 2 pgs. [Letter], 4/13/1972
RN to Langhorne Washburn re: Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. 1 pg [Memo], 7/20/1972
Colson to The President re: Democrats for Nixon. 3 pgs. [Memo], 7/12/1972
Herge to MacGregor through Magruder re: Governor Bartlett's Invitation to Governor Reagan. 4 pgs with attachments. [Memo], 8/4/1972
Dean to The President re: Pennsylvania Certification Requirement. 4 pgs with attachments. [Memo], 9/20/1972
citationUrl
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Returned White House Special Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26128307
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
20168a6a689a7e69
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library
White House Special Files Collection
Folder List
Box Number Folder Number Document Date
Document Type
Document Description
72
2
07/08/1971
Report
LKF notes on meeting at Holmes Tuttle
residence. 8pgs.
72
2
04/13/1972
Letter
John Price to The President re:
Congressional race against Lester Woliff. 2
pgs.
72
2
07/20/1972
Memo
RN to Langhorne Washburn re: Federal
Election Campaign Act of 1971. 1 pg
72
2
07/12/1972
Memo
Colson to The President re: Democrats for
Nixon. 3 pgs.
72
2
08/04/1972
Memo
Herge to MacGregor through Magruder re:
Governor Bartlett's Invitation to Governor
Reagan. 4 pgs with attachments.
72
2
09/20/1972
Memo
Dean to The President re: Pennsylvania
Certification Requirement. 4 pgs with
attachments.
Tuesday, September 04, 2007
Page 1 of 1
LKF Notes on Meeting
9:00 AM - Thursday, July 8, 1971
Holmes Tuttle residence, Los Angeles
attended by
Leonard Firestone
Holmes Tuttle
Tom Reed
Wm. French Smith
After some small talk and pleasant chatter, Tom Reed produced the
attached memorandum, which we all went over, discussing various
points.
At the outset, Reed informed the group that the program outlined in
the memorandum has been discussed with and was approved by the
Attorney General in Washington, D.C. on June 29, 1971, as noted
at the end of the memorandum.
Reed indicated they wanted a broad-based delegation, representing
all elements of the Party, and that, in order to keep the heat off
the Governor, they were going to have a small organizing committee
that would be responsible for picking the delegation.
LKF asked him if it was the intention to broaden the Organizing
Committee into a selection committee, including legislators and
other interested groups. Reed responded that he felt it would not
be wise to do so, and that the selection committee should be the
five names on the Organizing Committee.
LKF suggested that it would be very necessary for the campaign group
to be able to select and invite delegates, based on such factors as
contributions to the campaign, desire and ability to work in the
campaign, and other considerations that would benefit the campaign
committee.
Reed agreed this was necessary, but thought that the Organizing
Committee could bear these factors in mind as they were making their
selections.
Holmes Tuttle said, "That's the reason you (LKF) were asked to join
the Committee, since you are close to the President and the
Administration.
LKF made it clear that he had accepted on the basis of the Governor
asking him, and that he had received no request or instruction from
anyone else to serve on the Committee.
It was announced that Bill Smith will act as Counsel to the Organizing
Committee and the Delegation, and will be in charge of operations of
the Delegation, under Reed. However, since he is Chairman of the
Board of Regents of the University of California, the Governor did
not want to have Smith's name made public in this connection.
notes on meeting
July 8, 1971
page 2
Bill Smith suggested that August was a little early to announce
the Organizing Committee, but Reed insisted it should be done at
that time, in order to stop speculation around the State, and
in Sacramento in particular.
There was some discussion as to the possibility of a competing dele-
gation, but, generally, we all felt that McCloskey would wash out
and would probably not be a threat.
With regard to the schedule item in the memorandum that, late in
March 1972, the delegation list would be submitted to the Governor
for approval, LKF asked if, since it would be essentially a delegation
for President Nixon, it was not the intention that the President
would also approve the list?
Reed said we would assume the Governor would take it up with the
President.
Finally, Holmes Tuttle said to Reed, "Well, do you want to bring up
that other matter?"
Reed sort of mumbled, "What other matter?"
Tuttle said, "Well, you know, about the campaign. II
Reed: "Oh, yes. I talked to the Attorney General about it, and he
agreed that there would be nothing done on the campaign until the
whole thing could be structured at one time and the Attorney General
had had a chance to talk about it on the spot here in California."
LKF: "In that connection, I think I should tell you -- you probably
are aware of the fact that there was an announcement about three weeks
ago that was, to say the least, premature. I don't understand how it
got out, but the way I have been explaining it is that, because of my
association with the Nixon Foundation, the Californians for Revenue Sh
program, and the Citizens for Nixon organization in Washington, D.C.,
someone might have gotten mixed up and come to the conclusion that I
was heading up something else out here. However, the article was
simply confused. I talked personally with the Attorney General after
that article came out, and simply told him I would be willing to do
anything he asked me to do."
LKF also told the group about the call he received from the Governor
while in Pebble Beach on Sunday, June 27th.
Bill Smith said the Governor hadn't meant to say that he didn't want
LKF, or that LKF would be disruptive. The Governor was only trying
to indicate that he didn't think any one name should be put up at
this time. Instead, should wait until the full leadership group for
the campaign could be structured.
THE
notes on meeting
July 8, 1971
page 3
Bill Smith again said the Governor was only implying about waiting
to fill out the whole structure.
LKF: "I'm the one who talked to the Governor and I'm telling you
what he said."
Bill Smith: "I don't think he meant that. He doesn't consider you
disruptive."
LKF concluded by saying he didn't think he was disruptive or divisive
and repeated the strong support he has given to Governor Reagan in
two campaigns, and also to Senator Murphy last year. He added that
he thought he would be able to do the job to the satisfaction of the
Party and all concerned, and that, if asked, he would do it.
During the discussion, Reed spoke up and said he thought the Governo
meant only that he didn't want one name put up there in front, to be
shot at.
next meeting of Organizing Committee scheduled for September 14, 1971
MEMORANDUM for The File
Telephone Conversation, LKF and RR
Sunday, June 27, 1971
RR telephoned LKF, approx. 10:30 AM, Sunday, June 27th, at Pebble
Beach. (LKF had come down to Pebble Beach about midnight, Saturday,
June 26th, from San Mateo, after attending Margaret Heatley's weddin
and had learned that Holmes Tuttle was staying with the Darts for
the week-end at Pebble Beach, but LKF did not have occasion to talk
with either of them)
LKF feels sure that RR could have known of LKF's travel plans only
through Mr. Dart or Mr. Tuttle, and he is inclined to believe that
it was Mr. Tuttle who "programmed" the telephone call.
At the outset, the telephone conversation was about the wedding,
golf, and things of a general nature, all in a pleasant exchange.
RR then said: "I was talking to the Attorney General a few days
ago about the delegation. In the course of the conversation, the
article that was in last Sunday's Los Angeles Times came up."
At that point, LKF said: "Yes, Ron, that was sort of premature.
Fortunately, I had to leave for Akron, and did not have to comment
on it to the press. However, when I got back to San Francisco,
several of my friends asked me about it, and I simply told them
that, since I am head of the President's Foundation, and have also
been head of the California Revenue-sharing support program, I could
only assume someone had jumped to the conclusion I might be heading
up a Citizens for Nixon campaign, and in the speculation this kind
of an article got published."
Telephone Conversation, LKF and RR
Sunday, June 27, 1971
page 2
That response seemed to slow him down a little. However, he said:
"The reason I called you is to tell you that, since we are good
friends, I didn't want you to feel I was talking behind your back,
and I told the Attorney General I didn't think it would be a good
idea for you to serve as Chairman. "
He went on to say that the Party had been badly fractured in the
past, that the cracks had been painted over with a thin layer, and
we just couldn't disrupt things again.
He said: "Of course, we couldn't have Salvatori in the job, from
one side of the spectrum, or you (meaning LKF) in the job from the
other side of the spectrum. "
When he was through, LKF said: "Ron, you have every right to your
opinion, and I respect your thoughts, but I simply can't accept
the concept that I am devisive in the Party, or would be disruptive.
You will recall that I have supported you very liberally on two
occasions, and that I probably gave as much or more to George Murphy
campaign than anyone, and I have always supported the Party."
He responded: "Oh, you should be in the campaign, but it probably
should be run by means of a co-chairmen or committee arrangement, in
some manner we could all agree on. "
LKF resisted the temptation of asking RR who he had in mind, as he
didn't want to bring that up. LKF simply replied that he was dedica
to the re-election of the President, and that he had told the Attorn
General he would serve in any capacity the President or the Attor
Telephone Conversation, LKF and RR
Sunday, June 27, 1971
page 3
General wanted him to serve, adding "I want you to know that if
either of them ask me to serve as Campaign Chairman, that is what
I am going to do."
LKF further told RR that "if I am asked to do it, I have already
told the Attorney General the first thing I would do would be to
come to see you and discuss the possibility of you being Honorary
Chairman, and to go over the general campaign plans and strategy
with you. "
RR said he was also going to work hard for the re-election of the
President.
LKF said one thing he could suggest for RR to do was to get hold
of Reinecke, Younger and Flournoy, and anybody else in the Republican
Party who was working now for 1974 and tell them that they are to
keep their eyes on 1972 until the President is re-elected. LKF
pointed out the fund-raising dinners that Reinecke and Younger are
planning.
RR knew about this, but said the trouble was the Democrats are all
running now for 1974, to the point where you can't find anyone in
Sacramento.
LKF ended up the conversation by commenting we would just have to
wait and see how things develop, and said he hoped to see RR soon.
POLICY FOR SELECTION OF THE CALIFORNIA DELEGATION
TO THE 1972 REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION
MAKEUP:
96 delegates: 2 from each congressional district, 10 at large (no more
than 4 from each congressional district), and 96 alternates.
LEADERSHIP:
Governor Reagan, Chairman of delegation. T. C. Reed, Vice-Chairman.
Delegation firmly pledged to the renomination of President Nixon.
ORGANIZING COMMITTEE:
T. C. Reed, Chairman; Eleanor Ring; Governor Reagan (to be represented
by one staff member); Holmes Tuttle; Leonard Firestone.
Counsel (not for public announcement): W. F. Smith.
Staff: To be selected by Chairman (Reed) with approval of the Committee.
Initially, Helen Healey will act as Secretary of the Committee.
Records and Files: Office of the National Committeeman.
SCHEDULE:
August 1971 - Public announcement of organizing committee.
September-December 1971 - Informal "hearings. Luncheon meetings
with key leadership. Somewhat formal "hearings" by Reed and
Ring at RSCCC State Convention, October 1-3.
January 1972 - Committee commences deliberations as a group,
including others as appropriate.
Late March 1972 - (After New Hampshire, Wisconson, primaries)
Submit list to Governor for approval. List to include suggested
officers of delegation. No "draft" lists to be released prior
to this date.
March 8, 1972 - Earliest date to file for primary.
April 7, 1972 - Latest date to file for primary.
PRIMARY CAMPAIGN MANAGEMENT:
To be determined by the President and the Governor in the spring of
1972 in light of apparent challenges.
PROCEDURES:
Every effort will be made to involve the rank and file of the Republican
Party in California in the nominating process; to avoid problems under
rule 14 adopted at the 1968 convention; to assure that as many
communities and constituencies as possible are represented; and to
build political strength for the President and the Governor consistent
with the above. Computer time-sharing and file maintenance will be
used to assure the retention and analysis of all nominations.
POLLING:
The Organizing Committee will undertake regular surveys to analyze
the probability and nature of a primary challenge to this delegation,
and to ascertain the opinions of all Republicans.
ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CALIFORNIA DELEGATION AT THE CONVENTION:
To be the responsibility of the National Committeeman and Committee-
woman (Reed and Ring). Financial arrangements to be started by the
Organizing Committee.
The above discussed with and approved by RR, 7/5/71, Sacramento.
The above policy, but not specific memo, discussed with and approved by
John Mitchell, 6/29/71, Washington, D.C.
DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC.
140 BROADWAY
MEMBER NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
NEW YORK, N. Y.
10005
WHITEHALL 3-0300
April 13, 1972
CABLE: PINESTOCK
The President
The White House
Washington D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. President,
I do not know whether you have been told that I will not,
after all, be making the Congressional race against Lester Wolff this
year. In reapportionment, there were simply not enough Republican
voters both to give a Republicán a good chance at Wolff and
simultaneously, to create a safe seat for Seymour Halpern. So the
best parts of Halpern's district are being put together with a part of
Wolff's old district and the two of them will square off.
It has been quite a roller-coaster. I was getting along
extremely well with the Queen's County leader, a gruff diamond in the
rough named Sidney Hein. He had me designated for a State Senate
seat, only for us to bump up against a residency requirement. On top
of that, just as he and I were reaching the stage of camaraderie where
he said he wanted me on the Statewide ticket in 1974, he died - last
week.
I am now at Dan Lufkin's former investment banking firm,
concentrating on new town financing, housing and the financial services
industry, a very sensible thing to do since I have no capital of my
own. Sometimes the fates while seeming to conspire against you, may
be conspiring for you.
This fall I will be coordinating your campaign in Queen's County,
a very interesting place politically, and one quite critical to your
carrying New York. I attach an article you may have missed from this
week's New York Times.
Queens is a bellwether county, having gone for the winning
candidate for nearly every Statewide office the last ten or twelve years -
thus, Rockefeller, Javits, Buckley, Humphrey, Lyndon et al, have
carried it, as surprizing as that combination seems. It casts more votes
than any other county in New York.
I hope to be of help there to you. If I can be of help in any
other way, please count on me, and call me.
Best wishes to you
Sincerely,
John
John R. Price, Jr.
CC H.R. Haldeman
John D. Ehrlichman
John Mitchell
JRP:1t
THE WHITE HOI SE
WASHINGTON
July 20, 1972
MEMORANDUM FOR:
C. LANGHORNE WASHBURN
FINANCE COMMITTEE TO
RE-ELECT THE PRESIDENT
Sections 104(b) and (c) of the Federal Election Campaign
Act of 1971 require that a candidate for the office of
President, or a person specifically authorized in writing
by such candidate, certify to any person making a charge
for use of any newspaper, magazine, outdoor advertising
facility or broadcasting station on behalf of his candidacy
that payment of such charge will not violate the expenditure
limitations imposed by Title I of the Act.
In accordance with this requirement and the regulations
and guidclines found in 11 CFR 4. 12(c) and the answer to
Question 1, Part VII of the March 16, 1972 Federal
Communications Commission Public Notice entitled "Use
of Broadcast and Cablecast Facilities: Candidates for
Public Office", I hereby authorize you to make such certi-
fications on my behalf for my campaign for nomination and
election to the office of President. In that these regulations
and guidelines also require a statement of any restrictions
or limitations on your authority to act in this regard, by
this memorandum I notify ou that none are imposed.
THE WHITE HOUSE
EYES ONLY
WASHINGTON
July 12, 1972
MEMORANDUM FOR:
THE PRESIDENT
FROM:
CHARLES COLSON
SUBJECT:
Democrats for Nixon
During your meeting with John Connally, you might wish to get into
the question of Democrats for Nixon and Connally's role. Needless
to say, he is a virtually unanimous choice to head the organization if
he will do SO. Clark McGregor and I opened this question yesterday.
We didn't conclude anything but we discussed the question thoroughly
(separate detailed memo is attached).
We have been moving ahead, as you know, with efforts to recruit a
number of prominent Democ rats. We have done so because in the
immediate aftermath of the Convention the anti-McGovern feelings
will be the strongest and we can build momentum during this period,
creating the public impression of a wholesale defection from McGovern.
We have proceeded in the knowledge, however, that John Connally likes
to do things his way and that he might resent some of the efforts we
have made since he in effect was not running the show. We have, there-
fore, been walking a tightrope.
What we would like to come out of your meeting with Connally is his
ratification of what we have done to date and his willingness to in effect
take over what we have gotten started. Alternatively, we need a green
light to go ahead with our next best choices to head at least for now the
Democrats' effort.
All of the endorsements that we have sought thus far have been of indiv-
iduals. Jeno Paulucci went a little further than we had asked and formed
a Committee of Concerned Democrats and Independents with 7 other mem-
bers. We want to fold it into Democrats for Nixon on the assumption that
Connally approves; if Connally does object, we can, of course, keep it
independent but this will give us some problems with Paulucci, who is
sensitive to being in a subordinate position.
EYES ONLY
-2-
Paulucci, like Dwayne Andreas, expects Connally to run a national
operation; if, in fact, we ask Paulucci, Andreas and their friends to
be part of something other than the National Democrats for Nixon effort.
I fear they may feel we are downgrading their importance. Andreas
has a list of prominent former Humphrey supporters that he wants to
recruit immediately but once again he feels the need to find the mechan-
ism to bring them in. Max Fisher has at least a dozen prominent Jewish
Democrats that want to be folded into our organization. Once again, we
need a place for them to come.
We have also picked up the endorsement and/or commitment to endorse
of several labor leaders. In addition to the Teamsters, we have Calhoon,
Gleason, Ken Lyons, Mike May, Brennan, quite likely Rademacher and
a series of lesser lights, principally state level leaders.
Rizzo will be announcing soon as will Lausche. Smathers and Jack March
are working through the lists of former Members of Congress. We have
a bloc of former Jackson supporters headed by John Kenney who will
announce, but who would like to talk to Connally first. Balzano has a
group of reasonably prominent ethnics who can either be folded into
Democrats for Nixon or become part of the ethnic apparatus.
We have done nothing in terms of organization structure because once
again, knowing Connally's personality, we have not wanted to jump the
gun on him. We would like to get the organization established, set up
a national office, have Connally announce its existence and, of course,
his chairmanship as soon as possible. This will be the invitation to
disaffected Democrats whom we have not sought but who are looking
for a place to come.
It is the recommendation of McGregor, Mitchell and I that Connally move
as soon as possible so that he can become the catalyst we need. A series
of individual endorsements over the next two weeks is fine but none of
them will have the national impact of an announcement of a national
organization opening followed by a daily announcement of new recruits.
On the organization side, we have hired two young men, temporarily
running the effort out of an improvised office. One is a young Washington
PR man, former aide to Sargent Shriver by the name of Mickey Gardner.
I am very impressed with what I have seen of him so far and would hope
he would meet with Connally's approval. He has given up his PR job and is
available to us through the campaign. We also have John O'Neill, a first
year law student from Texas, for the next two months. (He made something
of a national name debating John Kerry.) To run the operation here, it is
-3-
EYES ONLY
my strong recommendation that we bring in Mike Monroney, Jr. as
the principal chief, day to day operative. Gardner and O'Neill would
work for him. I have known Monroney for many years. Connally knows
his father. Monroney is 45, ran for Congress in Maryland and lost,
is a life-long Democrat, but conservative and a Jackson supporter.
He is prepared to fold up his own business to spend full time, but
needless to say, is unwilling to make that move without knowing he
has Connally's blessing. Mike also would like for personal reasons
to have Connally talk to his father, Former Senator Monroney. Mon-
roney's feeling is that a call from Connally would make his father more
understanding of Mike's desire to join the campaign and, more import-
antly, it will also result in his father joining Democrats for Nixon as
well. Monroney, Sr. was very highly regarded by his colleagues and
this would be a very significant defection.
I have not attempted in the foregoing to enumerate all of the potential
Democratic defections that we believe we have. We believe prominent
sitting Democrats in Congress will work for us even if quietly or perhaps
will permit their associates to, be involved in our effort (as is the case
with Rooney and Delaney). We also believe parts of the Daley operation
will support us publicly. We have enormous possibilities on Wall Street.
We have some Democratic political leaders like Esposito. We have
former Democratic office holders like Governor Gary of Oklahoma
and Governor McNair of South Carolina.
The problem in a nutshell is that we cannot move out and really do the
aggressive job we need to until we staff an operation and give people a
committee to join. We cannot set up the committee and staff the oper-
ation until we know where we stand with Connally; hence, we are really
very much in limbo at the very time when we should be actively and
publicly bringing Democrats into the fold.
strachung
Committee for the Re-election of the President
MEMORANDUM
August 4, 1972
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HONORABLE CLARK MAC GREGOR
THROUGH:
JEB S. MAGRUDER
FROM:
J. CURTIS HERGE
SUBJECT:
Governor Bartlett's Invitation
to Governor Reagan
On May 31, 1972, Governor Bartlett wrote Mr. Mitchell, outlining
his need for appearances by the President, the Vice President,
Sec. Connally, Sec. Butz and Gov. Reagan in support of his
Senatorial campaign. A copy of that letter is attached.
On June 19, 1972, Governor Bartlett wrote Governor Reagan,
requesting that he appear in Oklahoma in early September.
A copy of that letter is also attached.
With respect to Gov. Reagan's proposed appearance, you will
recall that the Governor has agreed to make approximately
ten out-of-state appearances for us on behalf of the President.
Because of the President's apparent strength in Oklahoma, I
suggested to Clayton Yeutter that we advise Governor Reagan
that an acceptance of Governor Bartlett's invitation would
be his personal decision and that it should not be considered
to count against his commitment to us. A copy of Clayton's
reply to my suggestion is attached. We relayed that advice
to Governor Reagan's office.
For your information, we have scheduled an appearance by Sec.
Butz in Oklahoma on August 15, 1972. The Secretary will deliver
the keynote address at a fund-raising dinner for Governor
Bartlett on that date.
Attachments
cc: Herbert L. Porter
JSM chron
JSM subject
JSM working
JCHerge
nolog
56/15
6/22
May 31, 1972
The Honorable John Mitchell
Committee to Re-elect the President
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20006
Dear John:
I enjoyed very much talking to you today. At your suggestion, I
will put down the highlights of my request:
It would be most valuable to our campaign to have the
President, who is very popular in Oklahoma, to be in Okla-
homa and to support me for the Senate. He would be most
welcome any time and, of course, at the end of the campaign
in the last week before the election would be most helpful
to our campaign, peaking on election day.
Having the vice-presidential nominee would also be a tremendous
help, preferably near the end of the campaign.
John Connally, because of his being a Democrat, a neighbor
and so highly regarded in Oklahoma, would be invaluable to
our success in the Senate race. His support could very well
make the difference. He told me that he would consider
supporting me. Having him in Oklanoma during the week of
October 30, if the President is unavailable, would be tremendous.
I would like to nave Secretary Butz in Oklahoma twice: once
anytime during the summer months and one time in the Fall,
preferably during the week of October 23, if John Connally
comes the last week.
In addition, I talked with Ronald Reagan about appearing at
a kick-off for me on September 20, 21 or 22 and he agreed
subject to approval from you. His appearance would launch us
in good shape.
Sincerely,
Dewey F. Bartlett
P.S.: Be sure and follow up with John Connally. I will not
contact John further until I hear from you.
4/28
6/30
COMMITTEE FOR THE RE-ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT
7/20
Dead File
To Curt Herge
aug 3
I concur with your suggestion.
Bartlett needs all the help he can get,
and Reagan can probably help him more than
anyone other than the President. We'll get
some spinoff benefit from a Reagan visit to
Oklahoma, but nothing major unless we use
him for appearances other than the Bartlett
Cap event - and-Dewey might not appreciate that.
6/23 asked Patsy To relay to Pat
6/29 Sen Domman disoursed with MLC
and he well call Reagan
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 20, 1972
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
FROM:
JOHN DEAN D
SUBJECT:
Pennsylvania Certification Requirement
Pennsylvania state law requires that a candidate for the office of
President shall, within 30 days of his nomination, certify a list
of persons to be candidates for the office of presidential elector.
Forwarded for your signature is a letter of certification which
complies with this requirement.
Recommendation
That you sign the letter attached at Tab A
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 20, 1972
Dear Secretary Tucker:
In accordance with the requirements of Pennsylvania
state law, I hereby certify my nomination of the
twenty-seven individuals named on the attached list
to be candidates of the Republican Party for the
office of presidential elector in the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania.
Sincerely,
Honorable C. Delores Tucker
Secretary of the Commonwealth
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120
REPUBLICAN ELECTORS
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 1972
Herbert Barness
Mrs. Marian W. Bell
1352 Easton Road
B-311 Woodland Manor Apts.
Warrington, Pa.
5903 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pa.
Samuel A. Breene
W. W. Keen Butcher
113 Maple Avenue
8811 Towanda
Oil City, Pa.
Philadelphia, Pa.
Philip L. Corson
Mrs. Jean Devlin
Plymouth Meeting, Pa.
1008 Crestwood Drive
Philadelphia, Pa.
Theodore D. Deforest
Mrs. Otilie English
780 Elder Street
2050 South Shore Drive
Harrisburg, Pa.
Erie, Pa.
Charles P. Leach
Thomas MacBride
533 Penn Street
Waynesboro
New Bethlehem, Pa.
Pennsylvania
W. James MacIntosh
Mrs. Eugenia Madeira
641 Black Rock Road
3424 Grubbs Mill Road
Bryn Mawr, Pa.
Berwyn, Pa.
Nicholas Marsilio
Frank Morrow
201 N. Laurel Street
Gateway Entrance
Hazelton, Pa.
Beaver Falls, Pa.
Robert M. Mumma
Malcolm Petrikin
Pennsboro Manor
16 Lakewood Drive
Wormleysburg, Pa.
Media, Pa.
Lachlan Pitcairn
Richard M. Scaife
Bryn Athyn
5201 Westminster Place
Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh, Pa.
-2-
Charles D. Snelling
Mrs. Jane P. Swiss
2949 Greenleaf Street
3495 School Road
Allentown, Pa.
Murrysville, Pa.
Mrs. Shirley Watkins Steinman
Frank Toman
Rawlinsville
518 W. Emaus Avenue
Pennsylvania
Allentown, Pa.
Paul Utnehmer
Mrs. Gail Witkin
1615 Second Street
220 West Rittenhouse Square
Beaver, Pa.
Philadelphia, Pa.
Charles W. Wolf
Richard Wright
112 Baltimore Street
20 Churchill Road
Gettysburg, Pa.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
Jacques Zinman
224 N. Bowman Avenue
Merion Station P.O.
Merion, Pa.