Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Source Description

This file contains: From Charles Colson to Haldeman. RE: The RNC Communications Position and the blocking of Evans. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 3/10/1972 From Charles Colson to Larry Higby. RE: The response to the December 14 memo concerning the replacement of Nofziger. 1 pg. [Subject: Domestic Policy] [Memo], 1/5/1972

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
26145756
label
WHSF: Contested, 17-13
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26145756
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Contested, 17-13
description
This file contains: From Charles Colson to Haldeman. RE: The RNC Communications Position and the blocking of Evans. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 3/10/1972 From Charles Colson to Larry Higby. RE: The response to the December 14 memo concerning the replacement of Nofziger. 1 pg. [Subject: Domestic Policy] [Memo], 1/5/1972
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Contested Materials Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26145756
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
c4db09f899aa5b9d
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 17 13 3/10/1972 Campaign Memo From Charles Colson to Haldeman. RE: The RNC Communications Position and the blocking of Evans. 1 pg. 17 13 1/5/1972 Domestic Policy Memo From Charles Colson to Larry Higby. RE: The response to the December 14 memo concerning the replacement of Nofziger. 1 pg. Monday, March 21, 2011 Page 1 of 1 DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD [NIXON PROJECT) DOCUMENT DOCUMENT NUMBER TYPE SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION Calson 40 Holdinan (1p) NI new 3/10/72 C [DOC+26] RE: RNC N2 new Colora to Higby (1p.) [Doctar] RE: your new of DEC. of 1/5/72 C FILE GROUP TITLE L. Highy- Misc. Alpha Phone Joge BOX NUMBER HAV Denian 281 FOLDER TITLE Highy ACTION Memos 1971-72 RESTRICTION CODES A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial D B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual's F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for lav rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION NA FORM 1421 (4-85 Presidential Materials Review Board Review on Contested Documents Collection: H. R. Haldeman Box Number: 281 Folder: Higby Action Memos 1971-72 Document Disposition 26 Return Private/Political 27 Return Private/Political THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON March 10, 1972 MEMORANDUM FOR: H.R. HALDEMAN FROM: CHARLES COLSON SUBJECT: RNC Communications Position Per our conversation regarding the RNC communications slot, my report from Malek is that Evans is blocking the appointment of anyone. He is arguing that he doesn't have funds to fill the job, that he doesn't have funds to run the Committee and he has to see Mitchell and that Mitchell has to assure him of money. (Personally I suspect his real reason is to keep Bob Tuttle who is totally incompetent -- evidence today's fiasco because Evans doesn't want Dole getting publicity and this is a good way to insure that he won't.) Mitchell won't see Evans, according to Malek. I suspect he will eventually but to me that whole issue is irrelevent. Evans should be ordered forthwith to put in a top flight professional whom we approve. Malek has two excellent candidates, one perhaps a little stronger than the other and we are ready to go today. If we are trying to win an election, it's just unforgivable to have amateurs handling terribly important press questions. In addition to which it is an enormous waste of Koch's time to be doing the stuff himself and today have a direct instruction countermanded unilaterally and stupidly. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON January 5, 1972 MEMORANDUM FOR: LARRY HIGBY FROM: CHARLES COLSON SUBJECT: Your Memo of December 14 In response to your memo of December 14, copy attached, Lofton apparently had the final say on the cover of Monday of December 13. Thus far I have been spectacularly unsuccessful in getting Nofziger or any of his crew to budge at all. We do not now have control over what goes into Monday and we won't get it until somebody up there understands the rules of the game. I have tried but we are effectively ignored. If you think you can get anywhere with Nofziger, please try. I have the very uncomfortable feeling that that operation is not being controlled by anyone and what's worse, no one really seems concerned about it. The key is obviously who we put in. I talked to Freeman and he is definitely not interested in anything. As he puts it, if he would do anything he would go to the White House; that's his first choice. He would have no interest in the Committee. I think it's a very high priority that we find a man to replace Nofziger and that he be our man. Perhaps Malek could be asked to look for someone quickly. As you remember, I raised this with Bob who said he wanted to take it up with the Attorney General. Obviously that's great, but let's get it rolling if we can. Yesterday was a classic example. I sent Karalekas to the Committee after getting Dole's approval on Muskie's statement. He personally supervised the printing and distribution and then had messengers deliver it. It was on the wires within an hour and a half and 3 hours before its release time it was out. The Committee has never done this on their own, hard as that may be to believe. ene