Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 61
Politics and People L. OTTEN 'Twas Ever Thus The "Congress is blocking my program" The House Ways and Means Committee WASHINGTON-Presiden Nixon, in a 20- argument carries a connotation of Presiden- has reported a trade bill that goes far beyond tial infallibility that most voters reject. Con- page message, calls on Congress to step up its original White House recommendations in legislative pace and productivity. gress may be wrong on some matters, they protecting domestic industries. The Presi- reason, but the President is probably wrong dent's message last week merely reiterated Vice President Agnew criss-crosses the on others. his original proposals; it was masterfully am- country blasting away at "goldbricking" This reaction is almost inevitable when the biguous in suggesting a course of action for Democratic lawmakers who do too little on the President's program, and "radical liber- President-Mr. Nixon or any other President members faced with the very specific choice -is so often attacking the Congress not just of voting for or against the Ways and Means als" who would go too far. An endless cara- for doing too little, nor just for doing too Committee bill. But if some bill doesn't fi- van of Administration officials and other GOP much, but attacking it for simultaneously nally pass, the President's straddle will cer- campaigners echo the Nixon-Agnew line. doing too much in some areas and not enough tainly not stop Administration stump-speak- It's hardly novel, of course, for the party in others. This line tends to blur the com- ers from reminding oil and textile areas of in the White House to run against the record plaint, to say the least. how the Democratic Congress refused to help of a Congress controlled by the other party. them. The tactic has proved a slippery, treacherous As did previous Presidents, for instance, one in the past, however, and it will be inter- Mr. Nixon asks Congress to stick precisely to Finally, any President is forced to gloss his proposed budget on almost every major over the extent to which Congressmen of his esting to see what success the Nixonites have item-he has vetoed several spending bills be- own party are responsible for the sabotage of with it this fall. cause they exceeded his budget plans for hos- his program. Mr. Nixon right now is leaning Harry Truman's campaign against a GOP pitals and urban programs, but has simulta- on the Senate to pass his family assistance "do-nothing" Republican Congress won not neously fought fiercely to prevent Congress program, and Congressional failure to act only his own reelection in 1948 but also would certainly be part of the GOP attack from cutting his plans for military spending, brought notable Democratic gains in both supersonic transport development, easing this fall. Yet it's undoubtedly true, as Demo- Senate and House. In contrast, the Republi- cratic leaders keep saying, that the major op- school integration. Each Administration posi- cans got nowhere in 1956 with an attack on tion, to spend or not to spend, may be emi- position has been coming from conservative the Democratic-controlled Congress. In both Republicans. Ways and Means Chairman those cases, the President himself was on the nently sound, but the overall effect can't help Mills is adamantly blocking the President's but confuse the average voter who hears Con- ballot; the device has proven even less relia- revenue-sharing scheme; it might barely be gress berated one week as wildly extravagant ble in off-year elections. The Republicans tested it again in 1958, and suffered dismal re- and the next week as foolishly penny-pinch- possible to circumvent him if John Byrnes, the committee's ranking Republican, weren't verses. John Kennedy had a Democratic Con- ing. just as stoutly opposed to the plan and stand- gress in 1962 but accused many individual Mr. Nixon's legislative message last week ing shoulder-to-shoulder with Mr. Mills. GOP lawmakers of blocking his program; criticized Congress for stalling his anti-pollu- All this, though, is the logic of the situa- even with the help of his performance in the tion program; yet the White House has thus tion, and political campaigns aren't always Cuban missile crisis, he came off with just far been notably silent as to whether it favors run and won on logic. Presidential attacks on about a draw. or opposes a proposed Senate bill that would opposition Congresses rank with box suppers * require the auto industry to start installing by as traditional campaign devices, and there's 1976 engines that are practically pollution- no reason why Mr. Nixon and his supporters Several factors make the attack on Con- free. The President chided Congress for inac- shouldn't see if they can get any better re- gress or Congressmen a very tricky tool for tion on his bills for job safety, better enforce- sults than did most of their predecessors. the President and his lieutenants. Voters ment of the equal employment opportunity rarely perceive a "Congress" as a collective laws and consumer protection, but his spokes- entity; they see only their own individual Sen- men still oppose as too far-reaching bills now ators and Representatives, and usually al- making their way through Congress in these ready have their own opinions on the merits areas. The Administration men may be cor- or demerits of these men. Often, the lawmak- rect, but again, it sure can confuse the public. ers the President singles out as balking his program are pretty accurately reflecting their own constituencies, and the Presidential attack merely makes them greater heroes at home. Presidential purges can succeed only against lawmakers out of step with their con- stituencies, and this year's GOP campaign will naturally try to find and focus on such cases. Many people, though, rather like the idea Street JOURMAl of Congressional delay on Presidential pro- grams. Pollsters consistently turn up sizable blocs not merely unconcerned about the dan- gers of divided Government-President or 9/16/70 Governor of one party, legislature of another -but actively seeking such a split because "that way, each party checks the other." Large numbers of Americans go even further and tend to believe that the less legislation the better: Fewer newfangled ideas tried out, fewer restrictions on business and individu- als, less taxpayer money down the drain.