Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 45
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
2
"The nomination is still elusive, " said John. "McGovern
hasn't got it locked up. 11 Commenting on lively scene at HHH
Hdqtrs, Chancellor said: "It looks like the nite the Lusitania
didn't sink. 11
Utley reported from McGovern Hdqtrs that McGovern aides
now see a closer race with McGovern winning by 5-10%, and they
feel that polls may have caused overconfidence.
NBC estimated RN would get 90% of vote. (Smith on ABC said
RN has nomination wrapped up -- he's safe, for those who were
worried, said HKS.) Chancellor said 10% for Ashbrook indicates
there could be a problem for RN in Nov. with disaffected con-
servatives. Reagan, on tape, represented RN at victory party
and he warned against GOP overconfidence and said GOP must
increase its registration figures.
Chancellor, on NBC, said "It does begin to look like McGovern's
day. 11 He indicated that McGovern would probably win, but by less
than early margin of 15%. Brinkley said he didn't see why Calif.
election officials were upset by nets projections; it's nothing new,
he said, as newspapers have put out early election editions for a
century. (Thruout evening, nets' frustration -- especially NET
and NBC -- was evident over slowdown.)
McGovern, on NBC, said: "We're on the way to the nomination."
He cited support in industrial state of N.J. and diverse state of
Calif. as proof of his appeal, and he said he'd probably win on 1st
ballot. He said blacks were voting for him in greater numbers
because they were beginning to recognize him and what he stood
for. And he said that after N.Y. primary, he'd begin to go after
uncommitted delegates.
HHH, on NBC, pointed out that he'd won several primaries,
and he said the nominee will be named at convention, not in Calif.
He'll go on to Miami, no matter the result in Calif. He said he'd
spent $11, 000 in N.J. while McGovern had spent $250,000. He said
Wallace had done well in primaries, including New Mex., and he
"may be the balance of power¹¹ at convention. Finally, he pointed
out that Texas, Missouri, and some border states haven't been
heard from yet.
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 4bff63b839452cf2
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 574780245
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "574780245",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574780245",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "News Summaries - June 1972 [3 of 6]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574780245",
"collections": [
"White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
"President's Office Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/050/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/050/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/050/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 45,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "574780245",
"label": "News Summaries - June 1972 [3 of 6]",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574780245"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "574780245",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574780245",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "News Summaries - June 1972 [3 of 6]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574780245",
"collections": [
"White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
"President's Office Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/050/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/050/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/050/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 45,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574780245",
"naId": 574780245,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/050/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-050-03-002.jpg",
"mediaId": "4bff63b839452cf2",
"ocrText": "2\n\"The nomination is still elusive, \" said John. \"McGovern\nhasn't got it locked up. 11 Commenting on lively scene at HHH\nHdqtrs, Chancellor said: \"It looks like the nite the Lusitania\ndidn't sink. 11\nUtley reported from McGovern Hdqtrs that McGovern aides\nnow see a closer race with McGovern winning by 5-10%, and they\nfeel that polls may have caused overconfidence.\nNBC estimated RN would get 90% of vote. (Smith on ABC said\nRN has nomination wrapped up -- he's safe, for those who were\nworried, said HKS.) Chancellor said 10% for Ashbrook indicates\nthere could be a problem for RN in Nov. with disaffected con-\nservatives. Reagan, on tape, represented RN at victory party\nand he warned against GOP overconfidence and said GOP must\nincrease its registration figures.\nChancellor, on NBC, said \"It does begin to look like McGovern's\nday. 11 He indicated that McGovern would probably win, but by less\nthan early margin of 15%. Brinkley said he didn't see why Calif.\nelection officials were upset by nets projections; it's nothing new,\nhe said, as newspapers have put out early election editions for a\ncentury. (Thruout evening, nets' frustration -- especially NET\nand NBC -- was evident over slowdown.)\nMcGovern, on NBC, said: \"We're on the way to the nomination.\"\nHe cited support in industrial state of N.J. and diverse state of\nCalif. as proof of his appeal, and he said he'd probably win on 1st\nballot. He said blacks were voting for him in greater numbers\nbecause they were beginning to recognize him and what he stood\nfor. And he said that after N.Y. primary, he'd begin to go after\nuncommitted delegates.\nHHH, on NBC, pointed out that he'd won several primaries,\nand he said the nominee will be named at convention, not in Calif.\nHe'll go on to Miami, no matter the result in Calif. He said he'd\nspent $11, 000 in N.J. while McGovern had spent $250,000. He said\nWallace had done well in primaries, including New Mex., and he\n\"may be the balance of power¹¹ at convention. Finally, he pointed\nout that Texas, Missouri, and some border states haven't been\nheard from yet."
}