Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 41
THE PRESIDENT HAS SEEN DIGEST OF RECENT COMMENT December 4, 1973 ENERGY Describing Love as "in a funk, 11 Cahill of NY News says he's "terribly disappointed' over being shunted aside Aides said Love and DiBona were distraught" over RN's decision re: superagency. Story is also p. 1 in Inquirer Cahill further reports that RN offered Love Interior if Morton resigns, tho that "was 1st indication Morton had any plans' to do so. Monitor's Ellis in lead story quotes high WH official, applauding Simon's choice, as saying "logic has prevailed, 11 and writer notes Simon is "widely regarded" on Hill and w/in Admin. "as best man for the post. He's drawn praise from influential men who stand on both sides of rationing." Noting Love's critics say "there was too little coordination and too little evidence of firmness" under him, while friends say Shultz and Simon are "more interested in quieting Wall St. than in solving energy crisis, Trib. says "these arguments do more to confuse issue than clarify it. 11 It notes "there's been no visible coordination of policies" and needed cooperation and sacrifice won't be achieved "as long as govt. itself is indecisive. While steps taken thus far are sensible enough, much more is going to have to be done. 11 But, it adds, "firmness of govt. policy shouldn't be measured solelyby extensiveness of govt. action. If govt. had spent less time in past acting to hold down prices, regulate oil/gas industry, discourage investment in new production and delay development of alternative sources of power there might not be a fuel shortage. 11 Trib. says "firmest conceivable course of action" would be rationing, but "it'd also be most ill-advised. " Emergency action "will be futile unless accompanied by steps to encourage production" and "surest way to do this is to "get out" of controls. 'Return to free market would mean higher prices, of course, and this would be hard on some. But it'd be easier and infinitely wiser to cope w/ needy cases as they arise than to perpetuate crisis by policy which, in effect, has stifled production. If any company should prove more interested in hoarding profits than investing in expansion, that, too, can be dealt