Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
66328513
label
JWCicconi Memos to Mr. Baker, January 1984-June 1984 (3)
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
66328513
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
JWCicconi Memos to Mr. Baker, January 1984-June 1984 (3)
citationUrl
collections
Records of the Office of the Chief of Staff (Reagan Administration)
James Cicconi's Memorandums
thumbnailUrl
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
66328513
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1985-12-31
year
1985
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1981-01-01
year
1981
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
3613d6b476fff689
ocrText
WITHDRAWAL SHEET
Ronald Reagan Library
Collection: Cicconi, James W.: Files
Archivist: dlb/bcb
File Folder: JW Cicconi Memos to Mr.Baker, Jan-Jun 1984[3of 3]
Date: 2/17/98
OA
10792
Box
4
DOCUMENT
SUBJECT/TITLE
DATE
RESTRICTION
NO. AND TYPE
1. memo
J. Cicconi to James A. Baker III re President's
5/8/84
P5
Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, 1p.
2. memo
Cicconi to Baker re Cop-Killer Bullets, 2p.
5/17/84
D5
3. memo
Cicconi to Baker re Raising the Drinking Age, 2p.
6/12/84
PS
4. memo
Frank J.Donatelli to J.Baker re Balanced Budget
6/8/84
P5
Ammendment, 3p.
5. memo
Lee L. Verstandig to J.Baker re Balanced Budget
6/13/84
.PS
Ammendment in Michigan, 1p.
6. memo
Merrie Spaeth to Michael A.McManus Jr. re
6/25/84
PS
Questions for Upcoming Satellite Interviews, (p.1),
1p.
113/0/18/00
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P-1 National security classified information [(a)(1) of the PRA].
F-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA].
P-2 Relating to appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA].
F-2 Release could disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the
P-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA].
FOIA].
P-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information
F.3 Release would violate a Federal statue [(b)(3) of the FOIA].
[(a)(4) of the PRA].
F-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information
P-5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors, or
[(b)(4) of the FOIA].
between such advisors [(a)(5) of the PRA).
F-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy ((b)(6) of the
P-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(a)(6) of
FOIA].
the PRA].
F-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of
the FOIA].
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift.
F-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions
[(b)(8) of the FOIA].
F-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of
the FOIA].
WITHDRAWAL SHEET
Ronald Reagan Library
Collection: Cicconi, James W.: Files
Archivist: dlb/bcb
File Folder: JW Cicconi Memos to Mr Baker, Jan-Jun 1984[3of3]
Date: 2/17/98
OA 10792
DOCUMENT
SUBJECT/TITLE
DATE
RESTRICTION
NO. AND TYPE
1. memo
J.W. Cicconi to James A. Baker III re President's
5/8/84
P5
Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, 1p.
2. memo
Cicconi to Baker re Cop-Killer Bullets, 2p.
5/17/84
P5
3. memo
Cicconi to Baker re Raising the Drinking Age, 2p.
6/12/84
P5
4. memo
Frank J.Donatelli to J.Baker re Balanced Budget
6/8/84
P5
Ammendment, 3p.
5. memo
Lee L. Verstandig to J.Baker re Balanced Budget
6/13/84
P5
Ammendment in Michigan, 1p.
6. memo
Merrie Spaeth to Michael A.McManus Jr. re
6/25/84
P5
Questions for Upcoming Satellite Interviews, (p.1),
1p.
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P.1 National security classified information [(a)(1) of the PRA].
F-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA].
P-2 Relating to appointment to Federal office ((a)(2) of the PRA].
F-2 Release could disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the
P-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA].
FOIA].
P-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information
F-3 Release would violate a Federal statue [(b)(3) of the FOIA].
[(a)(4) of the PRA].
F-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information
P-5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors, or
[(b)(4) of the FOIA].
between such advisors [(a)(5) of the PRA].
F-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the
P-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(a)(6) of
FOIA].
the PRA].
F-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes ((b)(7) of
the FOIA].
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift.
F-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions
[(b)(8) of the FOIA].
F-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of
the FOIA].
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 8, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
SUBJECT:
President's Foreign Intelligence
Advisory Board
Anne Armstrong called and wanted you to be aware of several
points regarding PFIAB:
1. Anne argued that the membership of PFIAB, now at 21, is
already unwieldy, and she feels it would be unwise to expand
it further. She is especially concerned about the potential
Administration turnover when we (hopefully) begin a new term,
and the tendency of senior people to seek a PFIAB appointment
as they leave full-time jobs.
2. Anne said that, if new appointments to PFIAB are made
despite the above, she would urge we increase the number of
Democrats on PFIAB. The party balance on the Board has
apparently been upset as a result of expansion.
3. Anne is concerned that some PFIAB members may be working
on the campaign in an official capacity without taking the
leaves of absence that had been privately agreed on. This
is apparently not a legal issue so much as an appearance
problem, and is perhaps one we might ask the Counsel's
Office to monitor.
4. PFIAB's next meeting is July 11-12, and Anne wanted to
invite you to attend their lunch, or to drop-by at any point
during their meeting.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 15, 1984
A much larger article was
in saturiay's when. De x:
TO: JAB III
The attached is from Sunday's
San Antonio paper. I am told
that Abrams' comments got wide
circulation in other Texas papers,
also.
As you know, Mondale and Hart have
already used Abrams' words against
us while campaigning among Hispanics
in California, and we can expect
they will be cited in the Fall.
no
hi ber
To the best of my knowledge, however,
Abrams has yet to issue any sort
milling wid
of apology for the implications
contained in his remark. Shouldn't
someone talk to him about this?
(I'll be happy to follow-up thru
Fuller if you concur.)
Thanks.
5/15 Jc
JC
I've asked Fuller
his (ahams) musber in explanation
7 what he mid Abm
nurns, said Cot. Carlos Reynsido Lopez Nulla,
when
national airport, 30 miles south of the capital,
director of the National Police.
tely dis-
quality
Atlanta
Several
HUD official says Hispanics
were to
investi-
'don't mind' crowded living
isolated
cts to be
WASHINGTON (UPI) - A top federal
they prefer, some prefer, doubling up.
is in the
housing official said many Hispanic families
"That is, as I found out, a characteristic of
live in crowded conditions because of "cultur-
Hispanic communities, Irrelevant to their so-
the cya-
al preference," the Washington Post reported
cial (and) economic conditions. It's a cultural
rea store
yesterday.
preference, I'm told."
tampered
Undersecretary Philip Abrams, the No. 2
official at the Department of Housing and
Abrams could not be reached for comment.
as found
Urban Development, was quoted as saying he
Rep. Robert Garcia, D-N.Y., chairman of
highway
does not believe Hispanics might be living in
the congressional Hispanic Caucus, said, "That
Michigan
crowded homes because of poverty.
is really a racist remark. These people have no
"I don't think so," Abrams said in a Post
concept of what is going on is America.
Interview. "I'm told that they don't mind and
really live in another world."
1 GOP?
BOY'S
Graduation
Suits
ES
MOAMMAR KHADAFY
mmit?
No. 1 terrorist
PierreCardin
PARIS NEW YORK
cials still are optimistic.
Hafez el-Assad reportedly is
Penner's hap
dying from heart disease and
been serving
other ailments. His illness may
graduates over 10
have a positive effect, this official
years with exper-
said, "while he reevaluates his
ienred ronsul.'
image in the eyes of his maker."
tants to help in
Syria, which is Iran's sole sup-
choosing quality
porter in the Arab world, was
tailored suits.
said to be reassessing its ties to
Iran, fearful that if Iran has to sue
for peace, Syria will be isolated.
Libya. The fondest hope of all,
of course, is for the demise of
Khadafy, the man Reagan de-
nounced as the world's No.1
agitator of "state-sponsored ter-
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 15, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
SUBJECT:
Steel Industry Import Relief Request
For your information:
As you know, the U.S. steel industry is bringing a good deal of
pressure to bear in pursuit of their goal of limiting foreign
steel imports. I thought you should be aware of the timing of
different aspects of that effort.
The industry is taking a two-track approach, with the first
involving an ITC petition by the United Steelworkers and Bethlehem
Steel. Filed on January 24, it seeks five years of import quotas
on most categories of steel. If the ITC finds substantial injury,
a recommendation for relief will be forwarded to the President by
July 24; his decision on a remedy, if any, must then be made by
September 24. (I have heard from good sources that Bethlehem
calculated its petition filing date for maximum political pressure
on the President at the time he will have to make a decision.)
The other track is congressional: the industry is pushing legis-
lation that would limit steel imports to 15% of the U.S. market
for five years. The House Ways and Means Committee began hearings
last month, and on May 2, Baldrige, Brock, and McGrath all testified
against the bill. We can probably expect an attempt at floor action
before November.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 16, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
SUBJECT:
Domestic Volunteer Service Act
For your information:
It has been recommended that the President sign the recently
passed reauthorization of the Domestic Volunteer Service Act,
under which ACTION's volunteer programs operate (these in-
clude VISTA, Foster Grandparents, etc.).
The appropriation levels in this bill are higher than our
request in most areas, and Congress ignored our recommenda-
tion to terminate VISTA. However, the bill passed 369-25
in the House and by voice vote in the Senate, making a veto
impossible to sustain. OMB and ACTION have thus recommended
approval.
The President must sign the bill by next Tuesday, May 22.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 17, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI this
SUBJECT:
Cop-Killer Bullets
Background
As you know, Treasury and Justice have been meeting under the
auspices of OMB in an attempt to agree on legislation that
would ban cop-killer bullets. Such a ban is being earnestly
sought by DOJ and the law enforcement community, and has many
supporters on the Hill.
At this point, the only legislation being considered is the
Biaggi bill, which we feel is overly broad and which is
opposed vigorously by the N.R.A. The Senate Judiciary Com-
mittee, has refused to support Biaggi, but has nevertheless
expressed interest in whether a more limited ban can be
drafted. This point was made clear in a recent hearing when
Senator Thurmond agreed with a request by Senator Biden that
the Administration work out a proposal that would be more
acceptable than Biaggi. (I received a follow-up call from
Thurmond's aide to underline that request.)
Analysis
From a policy standpoint, there is little reason for not
supporting a limited ban on cop-killer (i.e. armor-piercing)
bullets. Treasury has already secured some industry coopera-
tion in a voluntary ban on such bullets, and it is a small
step to write that same narrow ban into law. Such a ban
would affect only one kind of ammunition: bullets designed
to penetrate protective vests or armor. The purpose of such
ammunition, obviously, is to kill police or others wearing
vests; in fact, some bullets are even advertised on the basis
of their ability to penetrate protective vests.
Another factor is the political situation: we have already
seen charges in print that the President is "kowtowing" to
the NRA by refusing to support a ban on cop-killer bullets.
This would, of course, be a tailor-made rebuttal for Mondale
to use against charges that he is too tied to special inter-
ests. The issue might also be used to undermine our strong
law enforcement stance. Thus, I would argue that it should be
neutralized.
Status
Treasury and Justice have now agreed on a proposal for a limited
ban on armor-piercing bullets. It will shortly be forwarded to
Dick Darman for circulation. The proposal is limited to the
most blatantly threatening bullets, and contains an exemption
for any ammunition with a legitimate sporting purpose. While
the NRA will probably oppose any ban, both Treasury and Justice
feel this proposal is limited, and thus defensible. We expect
it would have the support of law enforcement groups, and we
would hope that legislators like Thurmond would also be able to
back it. This proposal would insulate the President on an
issue where he has already been attacked, and on which he would
otherwise be vulnerable in the Fall.
I might add one other point: if we decide to support the pro-
posal, we can do so in a variety of ways. For example, we need
not introduce legislation, but could instead convey our proposal
in letter form or deliver it as testimony. The objective is not
necessarily to pass "our" bill SO much as to be able to state
accurately that the President supports a ban on cop-killer
bullets. The rest can be left to the Congress' deliberations.
I can go over specific details of the proposal with you at the
point when a senior level White House decision is required.
Thanks.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 18, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
SUBJECT:
Meeting with Charles Walker
Per your request, I met with Charles Walker, who had Buck
Chapoton's job under President Ford. He had some thoughts
regarding our tax reform/tax simplification study. Letters
we received from him are attached.
In short, Walker is concerned about the process we are
using. He feels that any report Treasury comes up with
will be picked apart quickly by Congress and the various
special interests. He argues that the report should be an
initial step which sets forth a framework, and should not
go into excessive detail. Walker suggests that a bipar-
tisan commission then be appointed to put Treasury's study
into the form of a specific legislative proposal. Only in
that way, Walker says, can we have a chance of success.
Walker struck me as being sincere in his desire to help,
and asked that I pass on his thoughts to you.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
5/14
MDT:
CHARLES WALKER (not the lobbyist
as you & I discussed last week)
called again today. He really
wants to see JAB. I have told
him NO twice !! He wants 15
minutes to discuss tax policy.
I can easily say no again, but
is this something that Jim
Cicconi could/would do? If
not important at all to JAB,
then I'll say flat out NO.
Please advise.
KC
VHB HEREES Cicconi SEELF CAN SEE
rim JAB REALY
is
MEMORANDUM
OF CALL
Previous editions usable
TO:
YOU WERE CALLED Kathy BY-
OU WERE VISITED BY-
Charles Walker
OF (Organization)
212/888- m 2421
PLEASE PHONE
FTS
AUTOVON
5-11 -3:55 pm
WILL CALL AGAIN
IS WAITING TO SEE YOU
RETURNED YOUR CALL
WISHES AN APPOINTMENT
MESSAGE
Got your message
re Tussday of Wad.
Walker will rearrange
his schadule if JAB
RECEIVED
could BY sea him DATE either TIME
63-110
Thursday or NSN 7540-00-634-4018 STANDARD Friday FORM 63 (Rev. 8-81)
Prescribed by GSA
# GPO : 1983 0 - 381-529 (205) FPMR (41 CFR) 101-116
LAW OFFICES OF
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER
or COUNSEL
LEE G. PAUL
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE
ROBERT P. HASTINGS
SIXTH FLOOR
CHARLES M. WALKER
FIFTH FLOOR
1050 THOMAS JEFFERSON STREET, N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20007
LOS ANGELES OFFICE
1299 OCEAN AVENUE
TELEPHONE (202) 333-8500
TWENTY-SECOND FLOOR
555 SOUTH FLOWER STREET
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401
ATLANTA OFFICE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071
ELEVENTH FLOOR
TELEPHONE (213) 489-4000
TELEPHONE (213) 451-2438
230 PEACHTREE STREET, N.W.
CABLE ADDRESS: PAULHAST
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE
TELEPHONE (404) 588-9900
SEVENTEENTH FLOOR
TWX: 910-321-4065
695 TOWN CENTER DRIVE
CONNECTICUT OFFICE
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626
SECOND FLOOR
TELEPHONE (714) 641-1100
March 14, 1984
THREE LANDMARK SOUARE
STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT 06901
TELEPHONE (203) 357-0100
James A. Baker, III
OUR FILE NO:
Chief of Staff and Assistant
to the President
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Jim:
So as to refresh your memory and not to test it, let
me say that during the last year and a half or so of the Ford
administration while you were Assistant Secretary of Commerce
and I was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy,
we both attended numerous meetings of the Economic Policy Board.
Incidentally, based upon my acquaintance with you at the time,
I was delighted to have learned of your work on behalf of
President Ford's campaign for re-election. Then, of course,
during recent years, I have been admiring your role in the
White House.
Although after the Ford administration you remained
active in politics, I returned to my profession of practicing
tax law. I am now retired (am of Counsel to my firm) and am
able to devote time to one of my highest priorities--doing what
I can to achieve a basic restructuring of our faltering tax
system.
Although it is politically naive to do so, I have
been impelled to address a memorandum to the Executive Branch,
Tax Policymakers with a suggestion I hope they will find appeal-
ing and useful. A copy is enclosed. I do, not presume to know
who and how many policymakers there may be who would have an
interest in these suggestions. I am, therefore, sending the
memorandum only to you, to Mike Deaver and to Richard Darman.
C
James A. Baker, III
March 14, 1984
Page Two
I am in Washington frequently and would very much
like to visit with you about this subject. May I call you?
Sincerely,
Charlie
Charles M. Walker
CMW:pd
encl.
CC: Richard G. Darman
Michael K. Deaver
:
PAUL. HASTINGS. JANOFSKY & WALKER
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
MEMORANDUM
TO:
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
DATE: March 14, 1984
TAX POLICYMAKERS
FILE NO:
FROM:
Charles M. Walker, Esq.
COPIES TO:
SUBJECT:
Tax Policy for 1984-1985
The suggestion set forth below comes from my perspec-
tive gained as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy
under President Ford (1975-77), a tax lawyer of some 45 years'
experience and a former Chairman (and other officeholder, council
member, committee officer) of the Section of Taxation of the
American Bar Association.
In his recent State of the Union Message, President
Reagan asked Treasury for a plan of action by next December "to
simplify the entire tax code, so all taxpayers, big and small,
are treated more fairly
Such a plan would result in that
'underground economy' being brought into the sunlight of honest
tax compliance, and it could make the tax base broader so per-
sonal tax rates could come down, not go up."
Under date of January 17, 1977, the Treasury Department
published Blueprints for Basic Tax Reform--a study and publication
that received many hours of my own effort while Assistant Secre-
tary. The forthcoming Treasury report doubtless will take Blue-
prints into account. I know that Assistant Treasury Secretary
John Chapoton is well aware of it.
Blueprints did not produce any discernable explicit
legislative response to simplification, let alone to basic restruc-
turing of the tax system. If the new report is to have better
results, something more is needed than thoughtful recommendations.
A politically realistic approach to Congress must be devised.
Here is the suggestion:
Have the President, at some appropriate time (either
during his 1984 campaign or after his re-election):
1.
Urge upon Congress the critical need of a
basic restructuring of the tax system. The case for this can
be convincingly made but is beyond the scope of this memorandum.
555 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071 695 Town Center Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626
1299 Ocean Avenue, Santa Monica, CA 90401 230 Peachtree Street, Atlanta. GA 30303
1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20007
Four Landmark Square, Stamford, CT 06901
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
TAX POLICYMAKERS
March 14, 1984
Page Two
2. Acknowledge that decisions on the
restructuring:
a. must await the December, 1984 Treasury
Report;
b. must be made in a suitable delibera-
tive atmosphere;
C. Must afford opportunity to comment by
affected taxpayers (individual and corporate) and others (such
as charities);
3. Recommend that during the deliberative pro-
cess (likely to require two or three years) Congress refrain
from enacting any tax legislation except as needed:
a. to increase revenue, and to do that
merely by raising rates across the board;
(i) This would avoid the addition
of further complexities of the law which, like the current legis-
lation being reported out by the House Ways & Means Committee,
will bring the system ever nearer to collapse through non-compliance,
unadministerability and inefficiency.
b. to address major deficiencies in the
present law, for example, to revise the principles of taxation
of life insurance companies, and to prevent glaring abuses in the
tax shelter area, such as use of tax straddles by offshore com-
modity funds.
4. State to Congress that during the delibera-
tive period he will veto any tax measure not in harmony with
paragraph 3.
5. Appoint a commission to convene early in
1985 to develop and recommend explicit legislation to accomplish
the basic restructuring. To assure that the commission's report
and recommendations will receive congressional action, its
membership should include key members of Congress, as did the
Greenspan Commission on Social Security.
Charas h. Macher
Charles M. Walker
LAW OFFICES OF
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER
OF COUNSEL
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE
LEE G. PAUL
ROBERT P. HASTINGS
SIXTH FLOOR
CHARLES M. WALKER
FIFTH FLOOR
1050 THOMAS JEFFERSON STREET, N.W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20007
1299 OCEAN AVENUE
TELEPHONE (202) 333-8500
LOS ANGELES OFFICE
TWENTY-SECOND FLOOR
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401
555 SOUTH FLOWER STREET
ATLANTA OFFICE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071
ELEVENTH FLOOR
TELEPHONE (213) 451-2438
TELEPHONE (213) 489-4000
230 PEACHTREE STREET, N.W.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
CABLE ADDRESS: PAULHAST
TELEPHONE (404) 588-9900
ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE
SEVENTEENTH FLOOR
TWX: 910-321-4065
695 TOWN CENTER DRIVE
CONNECTICUT OFFICE
SECOND FLOOR
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626
THREE LANDMARK SQUARE
TELEPHONE (714) 641-1100
March 14, 1984
STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT 06901
TELEPHONE (203) 357-0100
OUR FILE NO:
Richard G. Darman
Assistant to the President and
Deputy to the Chief of Staff
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Darman:
While you and I have not met, I would like to intro-
duce myself initially at least by enclosing a copy of a letter
of today's date I have written to Jim Baker. That will give
you some brief background information concerning me.
Based upon what I read in the press, you are "involved,"
shall we say, with at least that part of the President's recent
State of the Union Message dealing with restructuring of the tax
system. It is on the strength of that perceived involvement that
I am writing to you to enclose a copy of a memorandum I have
written on the subject.
As you can gather from my memorandum, I feel strongly
about the need to bring about a basic restructuring of the tax
system. I have already devoted substantial effort to that end
and am willing and able to continue the effort.
I am in Washington frequently and would welcome the
opportunity to visit with you.
Very truly yours,
Charces In macher
Charles M. Walker
CMW:pd
encl.
CC: James A. Baker, III
Michael K. Deaver
LAW OFFICES OF
PAUL. HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER
or COUNSEL
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE
LEE G. PAUL
ROBERT P. HASTINGS
SIXTH FLOOR
CHARLES M. WALKER
FIFTH FLOOR
1050 THOMAS JEFFERSON STREET, N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20007
1299 OCEAN AVENUE
TELEPHONE (202) 333-8500
LOS ANGELES OFFICE
TWENTY-SECOND FLOOR
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401
555 SOUTH FLOWER STREET
ATLANTA OFFICE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071
ELEVENTH FLOOR
TELEPHONE (213) 451-2438
TELEPHONE (213) 489-4000
230 PEACHTREE STREET, N.W.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
CABLE ADDRESS: PAULHAST
TELEPHONE (404) 588-9900
ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE
SEVENTEENTH FLOOR
TWX: 910-321-4065 910
CONNECTICUT OFFICE
695 TOWN CENTER DRIVE
SECONO FLOOR
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626
THREE LANDMARK SOUARE
TELEPHONE (714) 641-1100
March 14, 1984
STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT 06901
TELEPHONE (203) 357-0100
OUR FILE NO:
Michael K. Deaver
Assistant to the President and
Deputy Chief of Staff
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Deaver:
When you were in Los Angeles February 17, I was
scheduled to attend the dinner for you at the Century Plaza
Hotel as a guest of John Henry Dudley. Due to an emergency
that arose, I was unfortunately unable to attend.
During the reception period, Mr. Dudley spoke to you
of my interest in finding a way to basically restructure our
tax system. I understand from him that you were receptive to
the idea of hearing from me on the subject.
It occurred to me that the most succinct way of pre-
senting my thoughts was to prepare a memorandum on the subject.
I have done this. A copy is enclosed. Also enclosed is a
copy of letters I am writing to Jim Baker and to Richard Darman.
As mentioned in my letter to Jim I am in Washington frequently
and would welcome a visit with you on this subject.
Sincerely,
Chams In. Walker
Charles M. Walker
CMW:pd
encl.
CC: Richard G. Darman
James A. Baker, III
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 18, 1984
V
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
J.
SUBJECT:
Unitary Tax
For your information:
As I understand it, the Unitary Tax group formed by Treasury
will issue its report by May 31. They will probably recom-
mend that:
a) The federal government, including the IRS,
will assist states in making sure that corpora-
tions are not cheating;
b) the states, in turn, will work to stop the
international application of the unitary tax
(i.e. it should not be applied beyond the
"water's edge") ; and
c) there would be no federal law to require
states to abandon use of the unitary tax.
Though its terms could change, the above represents a compro-
mise which we hope will be accepted, especially by the 12 states
now applying a worldwide unitary tax.
CC: Richard G. Darman
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 21, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONL
SUBJECT:
Advertisement Paid for by Donn Hopkins
Per your request, I checked into the background of Mr. Donn Hopkins
and the problem with USDA he cites in his full page ad in the
Fairbanks paper (attached).
According to Senator Stevens' office, Donn Hopkins is something of
a gadfly in the Fairbanks area. He is a part-time developer and
has run for a number of local offices. Several years ago, Hopkins
began an effort to develop a resort in the Tongas National Forest;
hence the advertisement designed to get the President's attention.
Doug Riggs, who is from Alaska, points out that it is not uncommon
for the state's many "ultra-individualists," like Hopkins, to ex-
press themselves through paid advertisements in the Alaska news-
papers.
Senator Stevens' office assisted Hopkins for over two years in his
efforts to secure USDA/Forest Service approval for his resort plan.
The proposal, however, was repeatedly turned down by the Forest
Service. Among their reasons were opposition by the local com-
munity, a potentially detrimental impact on local fishing, and con-
cern that Hopkins did not have the financial resources to do the
job properly.
The Forest Service's determination was appealed up through the
agency, and eventually reached the Secretary. On September 7, 1983,
Secretary Block wrote Hopkins a letter (copy attached) in which he
declined to review the Forest Service's decision, thus ending the
matter from USDA's standpoint. Senator Stevens' office has told us
that they are convinced Mr. Hopkins was dealt with fairly throughout
the department's consideration of his request.
Please let me know if you need any further information on this.
Itember 7 1983
ir. bohn hopkins
F... Sex 89663
College, Alaska 99708
Dear Mr. Hopkins:
This is in response to your May 31, 1983, correspondence regarding letters
to you from Assistant Secretary John B. Crowell, Jr. dated December 6, 1982.
and May U. 1983. The letters are, respectively, in response to your purported
Antice of Appeal letter dated September 20, 1982, and your request for a stay
of the January 20, 1983, decision by the Chief of the Forest Service, signed
by Deputy Chief R. M. Housley. denying your application to build a resort
at Bailey Bay Hot Springs on the Tongass National Forest in Alaska.
You contend the Assistant Secretary exceeded his authority by rendering
these decisions not in accordance with the appeal regulation 36 CFR 211.19.
7 CFR 2.19 (d) (18) delegates from the Secretary to the Assistant Secretary
for Natural Resources and the authority to review decisions of
the Chief or the Forest Service pursuant to 36 CFR 211.19 (1) (1) (1v) and
211.19 (1)(2). Therefore, in responding to your letters, the Assistant
Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment acted within his authority
as stated in the Code of Federal Regulations.
The January 20, 1983, Decision Notice denying your application for a lease
was an initial decision by the Chief. The Secretary, or his delegate,
has discretion under 36 CFR 211.19(j)(1)(1v) to review an initial decision
by the Chief. I have decided not to review the Chief's decision of
January 20, 1983. The January 20, 1983, decision 1s therefore the final
administrative determination by the Department of Agriculture.
Sincerely,
AUG 1988
J. Acting Hilmon, Deputy Chief
John
Secretar
PHB
Sec. Cont. 02F93327
CC: LA, Sec. Rec., R-6
Asst. Sec Crowell
Feuhter
Robertson/Peterson
Hilmon/Housley
exitialed
Haug
Svensen
Draft
FS:Rn:FFrieder:ob:6/15/83:447-7754
File Designation: 2720
Odessa Disk #4
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 21, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI Jun
SUBJECT:
Executive Order on Pay Adjustment
For your information:
An executive order has been forwarded to the President that
would implement the 4% federal pay raise provided for in
the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act signed on April 18.
As you know, the President signed an order for a 3.5% pay
raise last December. The reconciliation bill provided,
instead, for a 4% raise retroactive to January.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 22, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI in
SUBJECT:
African Development Foundation
For your information:
The board of the African Development Foundation today voted
to remove Dr. Connie Hilliard as president of this semi-
autonomous agency, effective immediately. Hilliard is a
black woman and former Tower staffer who was recommended for
the job by the White House.
As mentioned to you yesterday, Senator Tower had weighed in
to urge that we prevent Connie's removal. White House
Personnel and AID were already aware of the problem, and did
their best to apprise the board of the Administration's
feelings. However, the board chose to ignore our suggestion
that any grievances be resolved quietly, and without recourse
to an abrupt termination.
I have informed Tower's office of the above, and assured
them that we would try to take care of Connie. (I was told
the Senator may call you on this.)
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 22, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
SUBJECT:
Conversation with Anne Armstrong
For your information:
Anne Armstrong called and wanted to convey that PFIAB has
chosen Gary Schmitt as its new executive director. The
current executive director, Fred Demech, is leaving in
August.
Schmitt is described as a solid conservative who is com-
pletely in tune with the President's foreign policy. He
formerly served on Moynihan's congressional staff. Anne
said she had gotten very positive feedback on Schmitt
from, among others, Goldwater, Wallop, the CIA, and the
military. She intends to inform Herrington of the Board's
choice shortly.
By the way, Anne is still anxious to either talk with you,
or have an appointment to see you.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 23, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
SUBJECT:
Edith Jones
Per your request, Tex Lezar contacted Edith Jones to explore
with her the possibility of a judicial appointment other
than the 5th Circuit.
Edith emphasized that her real desire is for the 5th Circuit
appointment in Houston. She is not interested in a District
Court or Claims Court judgeship outside the Houston area,
though Tex had the impression she might be interested in a
Houston district judgeship, or perhaps something major like
the D.C. Circuit.
Tex told Edith that she would be placed on the Justice
Department's list with a very high priority recommendation
in case a Houston district judgeship opens up. He promised
she would also be considered if a new vacancy occurs on the
5th Circuit (we can argue that there is still a "Houston
vacancy" on the 5th Circuit since Robert Hill is from Dallas).
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 25, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
SUBJECT:
Cabinet Meeting
For your information:
At today's Cabinet meeting, the President was briefed on
follow-up to the Grace Commission's report. In short, he
was told that approximately one-fourth of the recommenda-
tions have been either implemented, or proposed in our
FY85 budget. Of the remainder, most will require legis-
lation and/or involve controversial policy changes. Ex-
amples of the "controversial" category include proposals
to repeal wage protection laws ($8.0 B over 3 years),
reform federal retirement ($30.0 B), and sell all federal
power marketing administrations ($19.8 B).
Please let me know if you would like more details on this
subject.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 25, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
Am
SUBJECT:
Right-of-Way Cost Exemption for Rural
Electric and Telephone Cooperatives (H.R. 2211)
A bill is now before the President which would exempt REA-financed
electric and telephone cooperatives from paying for the use of
rights-of-way across Federal lands. Such entities would only be
charged administrative costs. Under current law they are required
to pay fair market value rental for such rights-of-way, with
rental costs averaging below $1,000 per year.
The legislation is sponsored by such people as Seiberling,
Marlenee, Lujan, and Oberstar in the House; Senate sponsors in-
clude Laxalt, Hecht, Andrews, Pressler, Burdick, and Baucus. The
bill was opposed by the Administration, but nevertheless passed
both the House and Senate on voice votes.
USDA has recommended a veto, arguing that a special exemption is
unfair to other right-of-way holders, and that rental costs to
cooperatives are negligible. Interior and OMB still object to the
bill, but recommend approval on the basis that:
a) revenue loss from the exemption would amount to
only $4 million over four years;
b) administrative costs can still be levied (thanks
to an amendment); and
c) the bill has overwhelming congressional support,
making it difficult to sustain a veto.
Last day for action on this bill is Monday, May 28.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 11, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
I tim
SUBJECT:
Update on Federal Employee Reduction
According to current figures, non-defense federal government employ-
ment had been reduced by 72,300. Ralph Bledsoe of CCMA told me that,
if traditional agency hiring patterns are followed, we may end up
5,000 short of the President's promised reduction of 75,000 in FY84.
Joe Wright and Don Devine are monitoring the situation, and will be
working to see that agency goals are met. However, OPM is already
broaching the idea of a hiring freeze--a move traditionally opposed
by OMB on the basis that agencies generally "over-hire" before any
freeze can take effect.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 12, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
SUBJECT:
Raising the Drinking Age
Realizing that a decision may have already been made, I would
nevertheless like to offer a few thoughts on proposed legis-
lation that would, in effect, compel states to raise their
drinking age to 21. For the following reasons, I feel it would
be unwise to support this measure, or, at very least, would not
have the President "out front" on the issue:
1. The measure involves using federal funds to coerce
the states into specific behavior. This is a blatant
example of federal intrusion into yet another area
traditionally left to the states. The Republican Party
and this President are both on record as opposing such
coercive use of federal funds; our position on the 55
mph speed limit is only one in a series of examples.
Further, a citation of previous measures imposed on the
states over our objection is no argument for accepting
this bill.
2. This measure revokes a right now enjoyed by the 18
to 21 year old age group. While it is arguable whether
the drinking age should have been lowered in the first
place, it is very difficult to revoke such a right once
it is conferred. By doing so, we as a party risk alien-
ating a large segment of the young adult population.
3. The argument for raising the drinking age is tenuous.
Even if we accept that drunk-driving accidents might be
reduced, there is no rationale other than tradition for
drawing the line at 21 - - why not raise it to 22, 23 or
higher? (And if tradition itself is an argument, state
decision-making in this area is an even longer-standing
tradition.)
4. This measure circumvents a widespread state reassess-
ment of drinking ages. A number of states, for example,
have viewed high school drinking by 18 year olds to be
the main problem, and have raised their drinking age to
19. A federal measure using highway funds as leverage
will end this "laboratory of democracy" process which is
typical of our federal system.
5. When the earlier report on this issue was released,
the Administration declined to support a federally-imposed
drinking age increase on the basis that such decisions
should be left to the states. This measure amounts to
the same thing, and our support at this stage would be
viewed as a purely political action (and perhaps as a
reversal).
On the whole, I feel Congressional support for this bill is typical
of election year desires to sign on with the "cause of the moment. "
It is ill-considered, and its method is inconsistent with our
philosophy of the federal government's proper role. If we cannot
oppose it, I would prefer to see us acquiesce in the overwhelming
will of the Congress rather than try to lead this parade.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 13, 1984
TO: JAB III
Attached is a memo from Frank
Donatelli re the balanced budget
amendment. I sent a copy to Lee
Verstandig for his comments, which
are also attached.
JC
(A "final word" note from
Donatelli is at back of This.)
NOTE
Told FJD & LV that nothing
was to be done on This till
our budget package has cleared
the Hill.
we
0/18
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 8, 1984
ACTION MEMORANDUM FOR: JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
Frank J. Donatelli
SUBJECT:
Balanced Budget Amendment
This is to recommend the direct involvement of the President in
support of the Balanced Budget Amendment by making a phone call
to Michigan State Representatives who are now considering a
Resolution for a Constitutional Convention.
I. SCENARIO
As you know thirty-three states have already called for a
Constitutional Convention for a Balanced Budget Amendment; two
more are required. The Republican-controlled Michigan Senate has
already passed a resolution calling for a Constitutional
Convention and it is currently in the Michigan House, in
Committee.
Sometime this week, the Committee should pass the Resolution and
it will move to the full House for consideration. Here are two
possible scenarios for a POTUS phone call:
a) contact the Committee on a speaker phone just before or
after passage of the resolution;
b) phone a meeting of the State House Democratic and GOP
leadership
Of course, there are other scenarios which could be used. The
actual call will depend upon the President's schedule, the
timetable of the Michigan House and thoughts Lee Verstandig and
other relevant officers might have. This memo is simply to get
the concept approved so we can aim towards a phone call later in
the week.
II. ARGUMENTS FOR
1. The President Is For It
This is an issue the President has repeatedly stated he is
in favor of.
2. It's A Winner
Simply put, the issue is a "winner" with the American
people. A May poll by Market Opinion Research showed an
astounding 83% of the American people favor a balanced budget
amendment.
2
3. It Protects Us Where We Are Weak
The Democrats have been fairly successful in placing the
blame for the deficits on the Administration. This has a number
of serious implications for us this year. It is the one aspect
of the economic record where we are on the defensive. It makes
us appear hypocritical when we talk about federal spending. The
President's direct involvement in the issue shows our concern
about the deficit is not just talk and when push comes to shove,
the Democrats will defend the deficits.
4. Strategic Importance of Thirty-Fourth State
The political battle in Michigan is not just one in a series
of battles for the balanced budget amendment. Because it would
be the 34th State, it assumes strategic importance. Although 35
States are required for a Constitutional Convention, the 34th
approval makes a balanced budget a fait accompli. Three States
have balanced budget initiatives on the ballot this fall and it
is all but certain one of them will pass. Thus, if Michigan
passes the resolution now, it will be assumed the Constitutional
Convention will be called come November. There will be pressure
on Congress to act before November to head off the Convention.
The balanced budget amendment will receive major media attention
and the Democrats will be put on the defensive.
III. CONCERNS
1. Bad Precedent
Some have expressed concerns about the President's direct
involvement in an issue in a State legislature, citing state
sovereignty and "opening the floodgates" of requests for issue
involvement.
To the State sovereignty/federalism argument, I would respond
this does not hold in the instance of a call to a Constitutional
Convention. Rather than dealing with a State-specific issue a
Constitutional Convention is indeed a federal issue. The
President's interest is certainly legitimate in this instance.
Secondly, the involvement would not be a heavy-handed
arm-twisting (a la cutting off state highway construction funds
should the states fail to pass the ERA), but would be the
President expressing his views and soliciting support for them.
To the "floodgates" arguments, I point out this could be the
President's only direct involvement in an issue before a state
legislature during this Administration. Thus, the only precedent
we will establish is one phone call per term, hardly an
unmanageable goal.
3
2. Local Political Concern
We must be certain we do not needlessly give credibility to
the local Democratic State Representatives, nor that we do not
needlessly leave the local Republican leadership out in the cold.
To make sure that does not happen, we should be certain that
Intergovernmental Affairs is involved with this project as soon
as possible to work on the final scenario.
3. Other States More Important
Montana, Washington, and California are the three states
likely to have initiatives on the ballot this November and the
odds on the initiative passing in at least one of these States
is, as said before, all but certain. Thus, the argument goes, we
could come up with an event in one of the other States -- why
Michigan?
My response would be Michigan is the best target precisely
because the vote will take place before the November elections.
Thus, as we go into the election, the likelihood of a
Constitutional Convention will be very high, and the President's
balanced budget work will be of strategic importance. If we
wait until November for thirty-four states, it will not be until
after November that the issue would assume strategic importance.
4. What If We Lose
What if the President makes his phone call and the resolution
is defeated, doesn't that make the President look bad?
No. The beauty of the situation is that a victory would bring us
to thirty-four states and be viewed as significant, but a defeat
would just be another of the many defeats the balanced budget
amendment has suffered.
More importantly, the President wins by losing, for he shows it
is the Democrats who are the obstructionists and opposed to doing
anything about the deficits.
IV. RECOMMENDATION
That I work with Intergovernmental Affairs to present you
with a specific phone call to be made by the President this week.
Approve
Disapprove
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 13, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
LEE L. VERSTANDIG he
SUBJECT:
Balanced Budget Amendment in Michigan
Frank Donatelli and I have discussed the possibility of
Presidential involvement in the campaign for ratification of the
Balanced Budget Amendment in Michigan. I agree with Frank that
Presidential involvement in this effort may well be desirable.
The key elements of that involvement: timing and and the nature
of the involvement need to be determined.
Timing
I have met with Mike Busch, the House Minority Leader in Michigan
to discuss his strategy for moving the Balanced Budget Amendment
in Michigan. His strategy involves holding hearings on the
subject and trying to move the Balanced Budget Amendment out of
committee when the Michigan House reconvenes in September. The
votes are very close in committee but if the votes are not there
to pass the Balanced Budget Amendment out of Committee, Busch
plans to move with a discharge petition to bring the issue before
the full House. This action will not occur until September. I
think it would be prudent for us to hold the President's
involvement until later in the Summer when it can have a more
immediate impact on the House's action.
Form of the President's Involvement
I think a Presidential appearance in Michigan in September could
well be tied into the Balanced Budget debate. It would be very
advantageous to the Balanced Budget Amendment effort in Michigan
for the President to personally appear. If that is not possible,
then other types of involvement, possibly including telephone
calls could be considered at the appropriate time in September.
Frank has made the point that Michigan is the best target for
Presidential involvement because its action will occur before the
November elections. I agree with that and think that of the
States considering the Balanced Budget Amendment at this time
(Montana, Washington, California and Michigan), Michigan is the
one needing the most attention. I plan to work with Frank on how
fast to accomplish our strategy.
CC: Frank Donatelli
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 14, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A BAKER, III
FROM:
Frank J. Donatelli
SUBJECT:
Balanced Budget Amendment in Michigan
I concur with Lee Verstandig's analysis as outlined in
his June 13 memorandum to you. Let's aim toward a major
on-site September event, such as an address to a joint
session of the Michigan House.
CC: Verstandig
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 14, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
SUBJECT:
Today's CCEA Meeting
At this morning's CCEA meeting, two subjects were discussed:
1. GNP "Flash" Estimates: The Council had asked for a working
group study on whether the release of GNP "flash" estimates
should be discontinued due to their unreliability. In today's
discussion, CCEA agreed that we should continue to release this
data. All of the participants recognized problems with the
figure. However, they felt it was useful data, and argued that
since it is compiled anyway, the figure would inevitably leak
even if it is not released. Further, with the recovery slowing,
discontinuing the "flash" estimates would appear to be a politi-
cally motivated action.
2. REA Bailout Legislation: This bill, which involves forgive-
ness of around $8 B in REA loans, continues to move on the Hill.
It has already passed the House, and just recently passed the
Senate Agriculture Committee by an overwhelming margin. At this
point, our only hope is to keep the bill from reaching the
Senate floor. Garn and Proxmire have requested concurrent juris-
diction for the Banking Committee, where we might be able to
delay the bill indefinitely, but their request is stalled due to
Huddleston's objections (as ranking Democrat on Agriculture, his
concurrence is needed; Helms has already agreed). However, it
should be pointed out that the measure could still be attached
to another bill as a floor amendment. Secretary Regan wanted to
be certain you were aware of the immediacy of this issue, and the
difficulties it poses.
CC: Richard G. Darman
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 15, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
Jim
SUBJECT:
Cop-Killer Bullet Legislation
Our legislation to ban cop-killer bullets, which was finally signed-
off on last week, has been formally transmitted to the Hill by Justice
and Treasury. Thurmond has agreed to be the prime Senate sponsor,
with Biden, D'Amato, and Moynihan as key co-sponsors. In the House,
Jack Brooks, Ham Fish, Dingell, and Conte are key sponsors. The
National Rifle Association has indicated it will not oppose the legis-
lation, and we have secured strong support from police and law enforce-
ment organizations.
In short, it looks like we have achieved something very close to a con-
sensus bill. Thurmond held a press briefing at noon today to explain
the legislation, and the press turnout was reportedly heavy. Even more
encouraging, as of this afternoon, 75 senators have signed on as co-
sponsors.
Senator Thurmond feels he has a good chance of securing swift passage
of our bill, and has set a hearing for next Thursday. On Wednesday,
the President will travel to Connecticut to speak to the Sheriffs'
Association, and we plan to include mention of the bill in his remarks.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 19, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
are
SUBJECT:
Meeting with Teddy Gleason
Teddy Gleason, President of the International Longshoremen's
Association, has requested a meeting with you in order to dis-
cuss several subjects of interest to his union. Doug Riggs
strongly recommends that such a meeting be scheduled, and I
concur.
Gleason will be in Washington June 27-29 when, among other
things, he will be addressing the Republican Platform Commit-
tee. If you agree, we will set up a meeting for that period
next week.
Thanks.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
JUne 26, 1984
TO: JAB III
Thought you should be aware that
MKD is apparently thinking of
cancelling the satellite inter-
view that Houston TV stations
were planning with the President.
The reason, of course, is that
we will not be going to Houston
after all.
However, I think we'd be losing a
great opportunity for uncontested
media coverage in a critical state,
and would urge that we go ahead.
Outside of the politics of saturation
coverage in Houston, it should be
remembered that the Houston TV
stations will probably cover the
President's visit to San Antonio
as they did last year.
This local TV interview idea is an
idea with great potential for the
fall, and the Texas visit gives us
a chance to test it in a major urban
media market-- Houston.
JC
6/22 ec.
Sulsa bad prickent
do y nor ging to the gAbas city
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 26, 1984
MEMORANDUM TO
MICHAEL A. MCMANUS JR.
FROM
MERRIE SPAETH
SUBJECT
WHETHER TO CANCEL HOUSTON SATELLITE
INTERVIEWS FOR THURSDAY
Approximately $1500 in planning costs and telephone rental costs
have been incurred so far (plus satellite time which would
probably have to be paid for). We could force the Houston
stations to eat that or pay for it ourselves.
Both stations urgently plead with you to go ahead with the
interviews and will agree to the following conditions in order to
make the interviews worthwhile to us.
1) no questions about space
2) special packaging as a special feature interview with
promotion. (Rationalizing that Texas is supposed to be one of
the most important states to us: KHOU offered to use the
interview when their brand new news format premieres in 10 days.
They have 2 new anchors and Dan Rather will originate the evening
news from KHOU that night. It's his old station. They estimate
that because of the new format, which will be heavily promoted
that night, and because of Dan Rather, they will double their
nightly share.
KTRK was doing some hasty thinking to offer an equivalent.
(Recall that this was supposed to be a practice session so that
we could see what you and Mr. Deaver thought of the whole idea.
Given the technical complexities, that is still a critical
element preceeding Monday's interviews.)
I promise that if we proceed with these as one of the
communications elements, that we will add the additional
condition that if a city is removed from the travel plan, it
loses its satellite interview claim.
Please advise.
Proceed
Cancel
THE WHITE HOUSE
MREFINGTON
June 25, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOF
MICHAEL A. MCMANUS JR.
FROM
MERRIE SPAETH
SUBJECT
QUESTIONS FOF UPCOMING SATELLITE INTERVIEWS
FOR HOUSTON
Attached are the questions for the upooming interviews by
satellite with the President C: Thursday. KTRE and KHOU cover (as
you see' the Houston television market. Both plan IC promote the
interview heavily.
Following, several cbservations from FY OVI days in local
television.
1) The anchors, doing the interviews, want to be thought of as
serious fournalists rather than actors chaired to desks. It is
critical to ther :0 be SEE: asking serious questions. The
President's answer may be as short as a sentence or phrase
reassuring the viewers that he is concerned and aware.
2) These interviews vill be played and re-played because each
news show has E different producer. The news directors have
reported that the producers are already fighting over who gets
the furst play.
3 The Prerident could use the opportunity IC 1E. erthasize E
topic which be feels surongly about 1000 example, nobs -- Texas
is booming) cr (b) be homey and personal with the interviewers. 7.
comment or compliment to ther c: tackling these important
questions would send then swooning. Chese are solid journalists,
but they are excited about interviewing the Fresident.
HOUSTON questions and information about satellite interviews
KTRK (ABC affiliate) - 713-663-4553 Jim Topping, News Director
interviewer: Sylvan Rodriguez ( 1 rated personality in am news)
news at: 7:00 am, 6 pm, 7 pm, 10 pm
170,000 households (595,000 people) at 6 pr.
275,000 households (962,000 people) at 10 pm
1) During the Texas primary, Democrats in Texas implied that
during c 2nd term, you would be more hard-line in foreign policy
because he would be free from the constraint of facing
reelection; what will your attitude towards foreign policy be in
your second term ?
2) Immigration is a hot issue in Texas. Will you sign the
Simpson-Mazzoli bill if it reaches your desk ? Would anything
cause you to veto it ? (Are you happy with it ?)
3) Mexican-American relations is important down here. You have
encouraged support of the Mexican economy. Will you continue to
urge positive, overt actions to help then through their economic
troubles or will you wait for further developments ?
4) Continuing the focus on latin American affairs, a recent
Supreme Court Decision hold that our government can send back
illegal aliens unless they car show a clear and specific danger
(such as threats against their own family). The Court said that
just "I'm worried" wasn't sufficient justification for asylum in
this country. We have a lot of illegals from El Salvador and
Honcuras because of the fighting there. Will you continue tc
take E liberal view of what constitutes danger tc these people
back home, or will you try to have them escorted back ?
5) Is this Hispanic vote coing to be important in the coming
Presidertial election ?
6) As an oil rich area, WE follow what's happening in the
Straits of Hormuz. If there is an interruption in the flow of
oil, what would our response be ?
7) Houston is "space center'. What are your OWL personal feelings
I OV about the space platform : Will funding continue for the
space programs :
KHOU (CBS affiliate) Ton Kuelbs, News Director 713-521-4383
interviewers: Chip Moody
Felicia Seeter
(Felicia will ask the 1st question. Then it will
alternate back and forth.)
:) How important is Texas IC the Presidential carpaign ? (WE
understand that former Vice President Mondale is considering
Senator Fentsen.)
2) Immigration is = hot issue here. The New York Times estimates
there are 400, 000 illegal alcens in Houston. Part cí the
Sinpson-Mazoll: Bill vould authorize hiring EOC more inspectors
for INF. Is that enough ? Can WE really regain control c ≤ our
borders I.OV :-
Hov will the huge task of identifying those qualify for amnesty
actually work ?
3, Hurrican Alacia hit US in August 1983. Although some
businesses have received disaster funds, the city has not. What's
the hold HE and when car WE expect to receive funds ?
4) Houster 'will be IC space what Detroit was tc automobiles".
Are you ES corritted as ever to the space programs -- the space
station. the Iuner Garding station ?
E i We have E IS year cló drinking age. Your proposal for E 21
year old age is controversial here. Please explain why you
decided or that.
KHOU has news at : E pr. (650,000 viewers)
30 F. : million viewers)
DOC: (360,000 viewers)
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 28, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
SUBJECT:
Federal Employee Reduction
At today's Cabinet meeting, the President heard a report on the
status of efforts to reduce federal non-defense employment by
his stated goal of 75,000.
Ed Meese noted that what was a major effort in the early years
is now "falling apart," and said that we could finish the year
short of our goal by 3,000 to 5,000.
In order to meet the goal, each agency will be required to sub-
mit monthly reports on their progress between now and October.
Though some Cabinet members noted their difficulties, Don Devine
pointed out that the government will hire 100,000 people between
now and the end of the year; he stressed that if they just con-
trol that hiring, our goal will be met. The Cabinet will re-
visit the issue in one month.
During the discussion, the Vice President questioned whether we
might file suit to challenge the constitutionality of employ-
ment "floors" enacted by Congress. Such provisions prevent re-
ductions even though we might conclude that fewer people are
needed to perform certain functions. His suggestion was not
specifically addressed, but the implication was that such a
suit might be helpful in other, similar areas and would also be
well-received by the public.
CC: Richard G. Darman
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 28, 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES A. BAKER, III
FROM:
JAMES W. CICCONI
J
In
SUBJECT:
Cuban-American Reaction to Jackson Trip
Per the request made this morning, Cathi Villalpando checked
with several leaders of the Cuban-American community in
south Florida for reaction to Jesse Jackson's trip. Jorge
Mas Canosa, head of the Cuban-American Foundation, said that
their community appreciated Jackson's success in securing
the release of the 26 prisoners; however, there is also a
widespread realization that Castro was using Jackson for his
own purposes.
The Cuban-American Foundation is paying travel expenses so
that the relatives of the released Cuban prisoners can meet
them on their arrival. Mas Canosa expressed confidence that
families would praise the Administration for its previous
efforts, and for allowing the prisoners to enter the U.S.;
he said the family members would probably not praise Jesse
Jackson.
With regard to the 26 Cuban prisoners, Mas Canosa emphasized
that they are a good group--genuine patriots who have been
jailed for their criticism of Castro. He also mentioned
that one of the prisoners has reportedly refused to fly to
the U.S. on the same plane with Jackson. The Cuban-American
Foundation has indicated willingness to pay flight expenses
and provide employment assistance to any political prisoners
released by Castro, including this group if necessary.