Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
118565158
label
[Polling Information - 1982] (4)
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
118565158
contentType
document
title
[Polling Information - 1982] (4)
identifierLocal
137
collections
Records of the White House Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (Reagan Administration)
Michael Deaver's Political Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
118565158
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1985-12-31
year
1985
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1981-01-01
year
1981
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
6782c81a3d36fa8c
ocrText
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Deaver, Michael: Files Folder Title: [Polling Information-1982] (4 of 6) Box: 65 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ Decision/Making/Information 19 THE ECONOMY AND THE REAGAN ECONOMIC PROGRAM Decision/Making/Informati 20 Assessment of Economic Variables "Compared to a year ago, do you think has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same?" National Interest Economy Unemployment Inflation Rates Gotten better 12 4 26 19 Gotten worse 51 83 42 37 Stayed about the same 33 12 31 42 No Opinion 4 1 1 2 "Thinking about a year from now, do you expect will be better, or worse, or about the same as now?" National Interest Economy Unemployment Inflation Rates Be better 43 43 45 45 Be worse 20 30 21 18 Be about the same 34 25 31 34 No opinion 3 2 3 3 ASSESSMENT OF ECONOMY PERCENT 100 OPTIMISTS 90 REBOUNDERS 80 70 PESSIMISTS 60 21 50 40 32 30 27 22 20 10 0 MARCH 6 MARCH 29 APRIL 18 MAY 3 MAY 26 JUNE 22 ASSESSMENT OF UNEMPLOYMENT PERCENT 100 OPTIMISTS 90 REBOUNDERS 80 70 PESSIMISTS 60 22 50 40 39 31 30 23 20 10 0 MARCH 6 MARCH 29 APRIL 18 MAY 3 MAY 26 JUNE 22 ASSESSMENT OF INFLATION PERCENT 100 OPTIMISTS 90 REBOUNDERS 80 70 PESSIMISTS 23 60 50 40 30 30 28 27 20 10 0 MARCH 6 MARCH 29 APRIL 18 MAY 3 MAY 26 JUNE 22 ASSESSMENT OF INTEREST RATES PERCENT 100 OPTIMISTS 90 REBOUNDERS 80 70 PESSIMISTS 24 60 50 40 31 30 26 20 21 10 0 MARCH 6 MARCH 29 APRIL 18 MAY 3 MAY 26 JUNE 22 REAGAN ECONOMIC PROGRAM HELP OR HURT THE ECONOMY? PERCENT 100 HELP 90 HURT 80 70 NO OPINION 60 25 50 51 40 41 30 20 10 8 0 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 1 3 3 4 5 5 6 1981 1982 REAGAN ECONOMIC PROGRAM HELPFUL TO PEOPLE LIKE YOU? PERCENT 100 HELPFUL 90 NOT HELPFUL 80 70 NO OPINION 26 60 56 50 40 40 30 20 10 4 0 2 5 8 10 10 11 12 12 12 1 3 3 4 4 5 5 1981 1982 REAGAN ECONOMIC PROGRAM FAIR OR UNFAIR? PERCENT 100 FAIR 90 UNFAIR 80 70 NO OPINION 27 60 50 43 45 40 30 20 10 7 0 2 5 10 10 11 12 12 12 1 3 3 4 4 5 6 1981 1982 28 Why Fair or Unfair? "Any why do you feel that Reagan's proposed economic program is (fair/unfair)? And what else? What else? And any other reasons you feel that Reagan's proposed economic program is (fair/unfair)?" Percent Tax cuts - Positive 2 Reduce government spending - Positive 7 Reduce government bureaucracy - Positive 2 Help people - Positive 9 Reagan doing a good job 10 Reduce unemployment - Positive 3 Economy - Positive 3 Inflation - Positive 2 Interest rate - Positive 1 Reduce welfare - Positive 5 Reagan - Honest 1 Short term problems 4 Problems already exist 1 Fair - General positive 10 Tax cuts - Negative 3 Too much government spending 1 Too much defense 1 Budget cutback - Negative 6 Hurts people - General 19 Hurts the elderly 6 Hurts minorities 1 Favors rich 14 Reagan not doing a good job 4 Unemployment - Negative 7 Favor big business - Negative 2 Economy - Negative 1 Inflation - Negative 1 Interest rates - Negative 2 Hurts education 1 Unfair - General negative 5 No opinion 10 REAGAN ECONOMIC PROGRAM WILL IT REDUCE INFLATION? PERCENT 100 WILL REDUCE 90 WILL NOT REDUCE 80 70 NO OPINION 60 29 52 50 42 40 30 20 10 6 0 2 5 9 10 10 11 12 12 12 1 3 3 4 5 6 1981 1982 REAGAN ECONOMIC PROGRAM WILL IT INCREASE EMPLOYMENT? PERCENT 100 WILL INCREASE 90 WILL NOT INCREASE 80 70 NO OPINION 30 60 52 50 43 40 30 20 10 5 0 2 9 12 12 12 1 3 3 4 4 5 6 1981 1982 REAGAN ECONOMIC PROGRAM WILL IT BALANCE THE BUDGET? PERCENT 100 WILL BALANCE 90 WILL NOT BALANCE 80 70 NO OPINION 63 60 31 50 40 31 30 20 10 6 0 MARCH 6 MARCH 29 APRIL 2 APRIL 18 MAY 26 JUNE 22 STUDY REAGAN ECONOMIC PROGRAM WILL IT REDUCE INTEREST RATES? WILL REDUCE 42% 32 NO OPINION 9% WILL NOT REDUCE 49% CUTTING TAXES As YOU MAY KNOW, THE FEDERAL BUDGET CAN YOU RECALL A TIME IN THE FOR NEXT YEAR WILL HAVE A DEFICIT PAST WHEN THE FEDERAL TAX OF AT LEAST 100 BILLION DOLLARS, RATES WERE REDUCED? (IF YES) WITH THIS SIZE OF A DEFICIT, DO AND WHEN WAS THAT ? YOU THINK TAXES SHOULD BE CUT IN HOPES OF STIMULATING THE ECONOMY OR RAISED TO LOWER THE DEEICIT ? SHOULD WE CUT THEM? HAVE WE CUT THEM? CUT TAXES 55% YES/OTHER 15% 33 YES/EARLY 60'S 5% YES/1981 8% NEITHER/NO OPIN 24% RAISE TAXES 21% NO 72% 34 No ONE LIKE TO HAVE THEIR TAXES INCREASED; HOWEVER, WITH THE PROSPECT OF A $100 BILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT NEXT YEAR, AND PERHAPS LARGER DEFICITS IN THE FUTURE, TAXES MAY HAVE TO BE INCREASED IN ORDER TO RAISE MORE REVENUE. I'M GOING TO READ YOU A LIST OF TAX OPTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN PROPOSED, AND I'D LIKE YOU TO RATE EACH ONE ON A SCALE WHERE A MINUS 5 MEANS YOU STRONGLY OPPOSE THAT PLAN, WHILE A PLUS 5 MEANS YOU STRONGLY FAVOR THE PLAN. A ZERO THEREFORE MEANS THAT YOU NEITHER FAVOR NOR OPPOSE THE PLAN, BUT ARE NEUTRAL ABOUT IT. OF COURSE, YOU MAY USE ANY NUMBER BETWEEN MINUS 5 AND PLUS 5 TO INDICATE HOW MUCH YOU PERSONALLY FAVOR OR OPPOSE EACH PROPOSED TAX INCREASE. THE FIRST ONE IS How WOULD YOU RATE THAT ON A MINUS 5, PLUS 5 SCALE ? IMPOSING A NATIONAL SALES TAX OF 1% ON ALL ITEMS PURCHASED IN THE UNITED STATES ELIMINATING THE 10% FEDERAL INCOME TAX CUT THAT IS SCHEDULED TO TAKE EFFECT ON JULY 1, 1983 RAISING THE TAX ON A PACK OF CIGARETTES BY 8 CENTS IMPOSING A TAX ON OIL THAT WOULD RAISE THE PRICE OF GASOLINE BY 5 CENTS A GALLON AT THE PUMP REPEALING THE PRESENT LAW THAT LETS ONE COMPANY SELL TAX BENEFITS IT CANNOT USE TO ANOTHER COMPANY WHO CAN TAKE THESE BENEFITS TO REDUCE ITS TAXES DOUBLING THE PRESENT TAX ON ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IMPOSING A WINDFALL PROFITS TAX ON DEREGULATED NATURAL GAS THAT WOULD RAISE THE COST OF NATURAL GAS TO THE CONSUMER BY 10% REPEALING THE DEDUCTIONS GIVEN ON FEDERAL INCOME TAXES FOR PAYMENT OF STATE SALES TAXES REQUIRING ALL CORPORATIONS THAT MAKE A PROFIT TO PAY A MINIMUM CORPORATE TAX LIMITING THE TAX DEDUCTIONS COMPANIES GET WHEN THEY PAY FOR EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE IMPOSING A TAX ON OIL THAT WOULD RAISE THE PRICE OF GASOLINE BY ABOUT 8 CENTS A GALLON INCREASING THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE PRESENT TAX LAWS BY HIRING MORE IRS AGENTS TO SEE THAT TAXES OWED TO THE GOVERNMENT ARE ACTUALLY PAID TAX OPTIONS PERCENT 100 39 22 POSITIVES 43 32 27 14 90 13 ZERO 80 13 70 8 71 22 35 NEGATIVES 65 60 64 14 20 50 46 44 40 35 30 20 10 0 NO TAX CUT IRS AGENTS INSUR DEDUCT 8¢ CIGS ALCOHOL MIN CORP OPTION TAX OPTIONS PERCENT 100 76 74 45 POSITIVES 73 41 47 90 ZERO 80 70 36 NEGATIVES 60 34 15 50 21 40 40 30 29 9 20 14 22 11 17 10 12 9 ø 8¢ GAS NAT GAS 5¢ GAS SALES DEDUCT HARBOR SALES TAX OPTION 37 Federal Budgeting Process "The entire federal budget process is the most irresponsible, Mickey Mouse arrangement that any governmental body has ever practiced." Agree strongly 30% Agree somewhat 24 Disagree somewhat 26 Disagree strongly 14 No opinion 6 38 Budget Options "As you may know, the federal government will take in approximately 670 billion dollars in taxes and other revenue next year. It then has to budget that money among the various federal agencies and programs. I'd like to read to you two possible budgets for the United States. Please tell me which of them you would prefer if you had to choose. Budget A would spend, among other things, 1 billion dollars more for education, training, employment and social programs; 3 billion dollars more for social security, retirement benefits and other income security programs; and 1 billion dollars more for energy than Budget B would spend. But, Budget A would run a deficit of 16 billion dollars greater than Budget B and therefore, some people believe Budget A would be more inflationary. Which do you prefer, Budget A or Budget B?" Budget A 44% Budget B 47 Neither 2 Don't know 7 39 Decision/Making/Information FOREIGN POLICY AND ISSUES IMPRESSION: EUROPEAN TRIP GENERALLY SPEAKING, DO YOU THINK RONALD REAGAN MADE A FAVORABLE OR UNFAVORABLE IMPRESSION ON OUR ALLIES IN EUROPE ? : WOULD YOU SAY IT WAS VERY (FAVORABLE/UNFAVORABLE) OR JUST SOMEWHAT (FAVORABLE/ UNFAVORABLE) ? OF TOTAL POPULATION OF THOSE HEARD/READ 40 SMVHT FAVORABLE 33% VERY FAVORABLE 26% VERY FAVORABLE 16% SMVHT UNFAVRBLE 7% SMWT FAVRBLE 51% NO OPINION 7% VERY UNFAVORBLE 3% VERY UNFAVORBLE 5% SMWHT UNFAVRBLE 11% NO OPINION 41% 41 Gaining Allied Respect "How successful do you think Ronald Reagan has been in getting our allies abroad to again respect the U.S. more? Would you say he has been very successful, somewhat successful or not successful at all?" Very successful 15% Somewhat successful 62 Not successful at all 19 No opinion 4 REAGAN ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS FROM WHAT YOU'VE HEARD AND READ, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING TWO POSITIONS BEST DESCRIBES THE WAY RONALD REAGAN FEELS ABOUT PERCENT NUCLEAR WEAPONS ?: 100 POSITION A POSITION A: RONALD REAGAN BELIEVES THAT WE MUST BUILD AS MANY NUCLEAR WEAPONS AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN SO THAT WE WON'T BE PUSHED 90 AROUND BY THE RUSSIANS ANY MORE. POSITION B: RONALD REAGAN BELIEVES THAT ONCE THE SOVIETS AND THE UNITED STATES HAVE ABOUT THE SAME STRENGTH IN NUCLEAR WEAPONS POSITION B 80 THEN NUCLEAR WEAPONS MUST BE REDUCED DRAMATICALLY TO ASSURE LASTING PEACE AND SECURITY. 70 69 65 NEITHER/ DON'T KNOW 60 42 55 50 40 35 32 30 25 20 10 10 3 6 ø APRIL 1-2, 1982 MAY 20-26, 1982 JUNE 16-22, 1982 STUDY 43 Thermometer Ratings Now I'd like to get your feelings toward some people, organizations and countries. I'm going to read you some names and I'd like you to rate each one on a scale from 0 to 100, where the worst possible person, group, or country -- in your judgment -- would get a rating of 0, while the best possible person, group or country would get a rating of 100. Most things, of course, would be rated somewhere in between those extremes. Remember, we just want to know your opinion of these people, institutions, and countries -- with 0 being the worst possible rating and 100 being the best. If I name someone who you don't know too much about, just tell me and we'll go on to the next one. The first one is -- how do you feel about (him/her/it)? Rating Percent Responding Italy 52 74% Germany 56 82 Israel 51 84 England 65 89 Japan 55 86 Palestine Liberation Organization 17 81 Menachem Begin 49 79 ISRAELI ACTION JUSTIFIED? IN YOUR OPINION, IS ISRAEL JUSTIFIED IN SENDING TROOPS INTO LEBANON ? OF TOTAL POPULATION OF THOSE HEARD/READ YES 44% YES 31% 44 NO 28% NO OPINION 16% NO 40% NO OPINION 41% U.S. RESPONSE TO ISRAELI ACTION Do YOU THINK THE UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO ISRAEL'S ACTIONS IS TOO TOUGH OR NOT TOUGH ENOUGH ? OF TOTAL POPULATION OF THOSE HEARD/READ NT TOUGH ENOUGH 37% 45 TOO TOUGH 17% NOT TOUGH ENGH 51% TOO TOUGH 12% ABOUT RIGHT 12% NO OPINION 16% NO OPINION 39% ABOUT RIGHT 16% MIDEAST SYMPATHIES IN THE MIDEAST IN GENERAL, DO YOUR SYMPATHIES LIE MORE WITH THE ISRAELIS, LEBANESE, SYRIANS, OR PALESTINIANS ? OF TOTAL POPULATION OF THOSE HEARD/READ ISRAELIS 44% ISRAELIS 32% 46 LEBANESE 10% SYRIANS 1% PALESTINIANS 4% LEBANESE 13% NONE 10% SYRIANS 2% NO OPINION/ALL 21% PALESTINIANS 6% NO OPINION/ALL 43% NONE 14% 47 Israeli Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy "When it comes to the Mideast, Israel now has far too much influence on the United States Congress and the State Department in developing and implementing our foreign policy in this key area." Agree strongly 30% Agree somewhat 27 Disagree somewhat 19 Disagree strongly 11 No opinion 13 Decision/Making/Informati 48 OTHER ISSUES GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE CUTBACKS MORE SPECIFICALLY, DO YOU THINK IF WE HAVE TO CUT THE NUMBER OF RONALD REAGAN HAS CUT THE NUMBER EMPLOYEES IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES THOSE WHO KEEP THEIR JOBS SHOULD BE ... ENOUGH, MORE THAN ENOUGH OR NOT THE PEOPLE WHO DO THE BEST JOB, ENOUGH DURING HIS FIRST YEAR AS NOT NECESSARILY THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN PRESIDENT ? THERE THE LONGEST. MORE THN ENOUGH 17% STRONGLY AGREE 69% 49 ENOUGH 27% NO OPINION 2% NO OPINION 10% STRNG DISAGREE 7% SOMWHT DISAGREE 6% NOT ENOUGH 46% SOMEWHAT AGREE 16% EXTEND UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS? As YOU MAY KNOW, UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE CAN PRESENTLY RECEIVE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE BENEFITS FOR A MAXIMUM OF 39 WEEKS. SOME PEOPLE FEEL THAT DURING THIS TIME OF RECESSION, THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD EXTEND THIS TIME PERIOD TO 52 WEEKS, EVEN IF IT COSTS ONE BILLION DOLLARS, OTHERS SAY THE TIME PERIOD SHOULD NOT BE EXTENDED BECAUSE IT WILL COST TOO MUCH. How ABOUT YOU ? Do YOU THINK CONGRESS SHOULD EXTEND THE PERIOD OF TIME INDIVIDUALS CAN RECEIVE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE BENEFITS, OR SHOULD THEY LEAVE IT AS IT IS NOW ? AND DO YOU THINK UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS TAXABLE INCOME, OR NOT ? EXTENSION TAXATION EXTEND 40% TAX 24% 50 SHORTEN 1% NO OPINION 3% NO OPINION 4% DON'T TAX 73% DON'T EXTEND 55% Thermometer Ratings Over Time Study Aug Sep Sep Oct Oct Nov Nov 30- Dec Dec Jan Feb 25 Mar April Jun 12-16 9-15 18-28 5-14 17-26 9-18 Dec 9 13-16 18-22 11-19 Mar 6 20-29 12-18 16- X XI TRI TRII TRIII TRIV TRV TRVI VII RNC1 RNC4 RNC5 RNC7 RNC (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (% Walter Mondale 56 54 55 57 54 55 53 52 52 52 50 52 52 50 Ted Kennedy 47 * 50 51 48 53 41 49 51 49 49 54 53 51 Caspar Weinberger * * * * * * * 53 * * 50 * * * Drew Lewis 55 * * * * * * * * * 44 * * * Alexander Haig * * * * * * 54 * 47 * 49 * * * Ray Donovan * * * * * * * * * * 42 * * 33 Ronald Reagan 72 70 64 69 67 66 64 61 61 63 56 51 58 58 James Watt * * 39 * * * * * * * * * * 40 Richard Richards * * * * * * * * * * * * * 42 Charles Mannatt * * * * * * * * * * * * * 43 Tip O'Neill * * 53 * * * * * * * * * * 50 Menachem Begin * * 50 * * * * * * * * * * 49 Republicans 61 60 55 58 58 * 57 56 55 55 53 52 * 54 Democrats 55 55 57 58 56 * 58 57 57 5º 57 60 * 60 NATIONAL PARTY TV ADS WITHIN THE LAST FEW WEEKS, HAVE YOU SEEN ANY TELEVISION ADVERTISING DONE BY THE NATIONAL POLITICAL PARTIES? THAT IS, COMMERCIALS DONE FOR THE NATIONAL PARTIES IN GENERAL, NOT FOR SPECIFIC CANDIDATES ? (IF YES) WHICH PARTY ? (IF GOP, DEMOCRAT, OR OTHER) WERE YOU FAVORABLY OR UNFAVORABLY IMPRESSED WITH THE COMMERCIALS ? RNC 9: MAY 26, 1982 RNC 10: JUNE 23, 1982 YES/BOTH 2% YES/BOTH 2% YES/OTHER 3% YES/OTHER 2% 52 YES/GOP 8% YES/GOP 9% NO/NONE 87% NO/NONE 87% Decision/Making/Information 53 National Television Ads == "Within the last few weeks, have you seen any television advertising done by the national political parties? That is, commercials done for the national parties in general, not for specific candidates?" "Which party?" "Were you favorably or unfavorably impressed with the commercial (s) ?" RNC 9 RNC10 May 20-26 June 15-22 1982 1982 Yes/GOP/favorably 2% 3% Yes/GOP/unfavorably 4 5 Yes/GOP/no opinion 2 1 Yes/Democrats/favorably 1 1 Yes/Deomcrats/unfavorably 1 1 Yes/Democrats/no opinion 1 0 Yes/Other/favorably 0 0 Yes/Other/unfavorably 0 0 Yes/Other/no opinion 0 0 Yes/Both (Deomcrat and GOP) 7 2 No/Haven't seen any 87 87 1982 CONGRESSIONAL VOTE W/PUSH THINKING ABOUT THE 1982 ELECTIONS FOR A MOMENT, IF THE 1982 ELECTIONS FOR U.S. CONGRESS WERE BEING HELD TODAY, WOULD YOU BE VOTING FOR THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE OR THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN YOUR DISTRICT ? WHICH WAY DO YOU LEAN AS OF TODAY -- TOWARD THE REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE ? PERCENT 100 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 90 DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 80 70 UNDECIDED 60 54 50 50 40 37 30 20 10 10 0 MARCH 6, 1982 MARCH 29 APRIL 18 MAY 26 JUNE 22 STUDY